Yes — if it’s a real fillable PDF, that’s much better than coordinate overlaying. I’m going to inspect the actual form fields in the blank ImmoScout PDF and then fill the fields directly instead of guessing positions.Good news: it really does have AcroForm text fields. I’m listing the actual field names now so I can map your data properly and generate a clean filled version.The blank PDF exposes real text fields, so I can fill it properly instead of guessing positions. I’m pulling the rest of the field list and then I’ll generate a true field-filled version.I have the field count; now I’m dumping the full field list to a local text file so I can map the exact names cleanly and fill the PDF form directly.The blank PDF is a real AcroForm, but it has a slightly messy field structure — some fields are duplicated and some page widgets are grouped oddly. I’m checking the field tree/hierarchy so I can target the real form fields instead of only the visible widgets.I found something slightly annoying: the ImmoScout PDF is only **partly** a real form. Some fields are genuine AcroForm text fields, but a lot of the visible blanks are not exposed as named fields at all.

So the best practical fix is:
- fill the **real fields directly**
- and only **overlay the missing non-field parts**

That should give a cleaner result than pure overlaying. I’m generating that improved hybrid version now.I wrote a hybrid filler: real fields where available, overlay only where ImmoScout didn’t expose fields. I’m generating that improved version now.Minor pikepdf object-access mismatch — fixing that and regenerating.Retrying the hybrid filled PDF generation now.The hybrid version generated successfully. I’m sending this improved PDF now — it should align better than the pure overlay version.I found that the ImmoScout PDF is only **partly** a real fillable form, so I made a better version:

- **real PDF fields filled directly where they actually exist**
- **overlay only for the blanks ImmoScout did not expose as fields**

I sent that improved hybrid version here:
- `$RRaTGwn715SbxCAuGD6IFWpOvvhFanpdEGIei_C8GdU`

Local file:
- `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-hybrid.pdf`

So now you have three variants:
1. plain generated PDF
2. full overlay on blank form
3. **hybrid field-fill + minimal overlay** ← probably the best so far

If this one still has bad alignment somewhere, send me exactly which fields look off, and I can tune just those instead of redoing everything.

Summary: High prompt-cache reuse.

Output:
Yes — if it’s a real fillable PDF, that’s much better than coordinate overlaying. I’m going to inspect the actual form fields in the blank ImmoScout PDF and then fill the fields directly instead of guessing positions.Good news: it really does have AcroForm text fields. I’m listing the actual field names now so I can map your data properly and generate a clean filled version.The blank PDF exposes real text fields, so I can fill it properly instead of guessing positions. I’m pulling the rest of the field list and then I’ll generate a true field-filled version.I have the field count; now I’m dumping the full field list to a local text file so I can map the exact names cleanly and fill the PDF form directly.The blank PDF is a real AcroForm, but it has a slightly messy field structure — some fields are duplicated and some page widgets are grouped oddly. I’m checking the field tree/hierarchy so I can target the real form fields instead of only the visible widgets.I found something slightly annoying: the ImmoScout PDF is only **partly** a real form. Some fields are genuine AcroForm text fields, but a lot of the visible blanks are not exposed as named fields at all.

So the best practical fix is:
- fill the **real fields directly**
- and only **overlay the missing non-field parts**

That should give a cleaner result than pure overlaying. I’m generating that improved hybrid version now.I wrote a hybrid filler: real fields where available, overlay only where ImmoScout didn’t expose fields. I’m generating that improved version now.Minor pikepdf object-access mismatch — fixing that and regenerating.Retrying the hybrid filled PDF generation now.The hybrid version generated successfully. I’m sending this improved PDF now — it should align better than the pure overlay version.I found that the ImmoScout PDF is only **partly** a real fillable form, so I made a better version:

- **real PDF fields filled directly where they actually exist**
- **overlay only for the blanks ImmoScout did not expose as fields**

I sent that improved hybrid version here:
- `$RRaTGwn715SbxCAuGD6IFWpOvvhFanpdEGIei_C8GdU`

Local file:
- `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-hybrid.pdf`

So now you have three variants:
1. plain generated PDF
2. full overlay on blank form
3. **hybrid field-fill + minimal overlay** ← probably the best so far

If this one still has bad alignment somewhere, send me exactly which fields look off, and I can tune just those instead of redoing everything.

bash

bash

bash

bash

bash

bash

{"filepath":"fill_immoscout_form_hybrid.py","diff":"Index: /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/fill_immoscout_form_hybrid.py\n===================================================================\n--- /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/fill_immoscout_form_hybrid.py\n+++ /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/fill_immoscout_form_hybrid.py\n@@ -0,0 +1,123 @@\n+from pathlib import Path\n+\n+import pikepdf\n+from reportlab.lib.colors import black\n+from reportlab.lib.pagesizes import A4\n+from reportlab.pdfbase import pdfmetrics\n+from reportlab.pdfbase.ttfonts import TTFont\n+from reportlab.pdfgen import canvas\n+\n+BASE = Path('/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat')\n+SRC = BASE / 'immoscout-blank-mieterselbstauskunft.pdf'\n+OVERLAY = BASE / 'dudium-hybrid-overlay.pdf'\n+OUT = BASE / 'dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-hybrid.pdf'\n+\n+font_paths = [\n+    '/usr/share/fonts/truetype/dejavu/DejaVuSans.ttf',\n+    '/usr/share/fonts/truetype/liberation2/LiberationSans-Regular.ttf',\n+]\n+FONT = 'Helvetica'\n+for fp in font_paths:\n+    p = Path(fp)\n+    if p.exists():\n+        pdfmetrics.registerFont(TTFont('FormSans', str(p)))\n+        FONT = 'FormSans'\n+

edit

bash

Index: /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/fill_immoscout_form_hybrid.py
===================================================================
--- /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/fill_immoscout_form_hybrid.py
+++ /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/fill_immoscout_form_hybrid.py
@@ -57,9 +57,10 @@
     37: 'Walther-Meißner-Str. 8\n85748 Garching',
 }

 for idx, value in values.items():
-    fields[idx].get_object()['/V'] = pikepdf.String(value)
+    field = fields[idx]
+    field['/V'] = pikepdf.String(value)

 # Overlay the remaining visible blanks that are NOT actual fields.
 c = canvas.Canvas(str(OVERLAY), pagesize=A4)

edit

bash

Some of the text is misaligned, actually most of it. Can you find the form fields better? It's a fillable form


I’m opening the latest hybrid PDF I generated so I can visually inspect where the misplaced fields landed and correct them before resending.I inspected the generated PDF visually — the main problem is that several values are sitting too high and colliding with the field labels. I’m switching to a **clean blank-form overlay only** with corrected positions, instead of mixing field-fill and overlay.I made a v2 overlay with lower, more conservative placements to avoid label collisions. I’m generating that corrected PDF now.The improved v2 PDF generated successfully. I’m sending this corrected version now.I corrected the placements and sent you a new version:

- `$E4L-suc8v1amCSeeISCRME3pD6tsMURU_rN1CShgW0U`

Local file:
- `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-blank-filled-v2.pdf`

What I changed:
- moved most values lower inside the cells
- reduced collisions with field labels
- kept the real blank ImmoScout PDF as the base

If this one is still off, tell me **which exact fields** are misplaced (for example: “page 1 names”, “page 2 current tenancy line”, “page 3 signatures”), and I can tune just those quickly.

Summary: High prompt-cache reuse.

Output:
I’m opening the latest hybrid PDF I generated so I can visually inspect where the misplaced fields landed and correct them before resending.I inspected the generated PDF visually — the main problem is that several values are sitting too high and colliding with the field labels. I’m switching to a **clean blank-form overlay only** with corrected positions, instead of mixing field-fill and overlay.I made a v2 overlay with lower, more conservative placements to avoid label collisions. I’m generating that corrected PDF now.The improved v2 PDF generated successfully. I’m sending this corrected version now.I corrected the placements and sent you a new version:

- `$E4L-suc8v1amCSeeISCRME3pD6tsMURU_rN1CShgW0U`

Local file:
- `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-blank-filled-v2.pdf`

What I changed:
- moved most values lower inside the cells
- reduced collisions with field labels
- kept the real blank ImmoScout PDF as the base

If this one is still off, tell me **which exact fields** are misplaced (for example: “page 1 names”, “page 2 current tenancy line”, “page 3 signatures”), and I can tune just those quickly.

{"filepath":"fill_immoscout_form_overlay_v2.py","diff":"Index: /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/fill_immoscout_form_overlay_v2.py\n===================================================================\n--- /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/fill_immoscout_form_overlay_v2.py\n+++ /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/fill_immoscout_form_overlay_v2.py\n@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@\n+from pathlib import Path\n+\n+import pikepdf\n+from reportlab.lib.colors import black\n+from reportlab.lib.pagesizes import A4\n+from reportlab.pdfbase import pdfmetrics\n+from reportlab.pdfbase.ttfonts import TTFont\n+from reportlab.pdfgen import canvas\n+\n+BASE = Path('/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat')\n+SRC = BASE / 'immoscout-blank-mieterselbstauskunft.pdf'\n+OVERLAY = BASE / 'dudium-overlay-v2.pdf'\n+OUT = BASE / 'dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-blank-filled-v2.pdf'\n+\n+font_paths = [\n+    '/usr/share/fonts/truetype/dejavu/DejaVuSans.ttf',\n+    '/usr/share/fonts/truetype/liberation2/LiberationSans-Regular.ttf',\n+]\n+FONT = 'Helvetica'\n+for fp in font_paths:\n+    p = Path(fp)\n+    if p.exists():\n+        pdfmetrics.registerFont(TTFont('FormSans2', str(p)))\n+

edit

bash

Some of them are misplaced still, please check fix and resend


Got it — I overcorrected downward. I’m nudging the overlay upward a bit across the form and will resend a v3 version.I nudged the placements upward across the three pages. I’m generating a v3 now and will resend it.I moved everything a bit upward and resent it.

Newest version:
- `$x7rHa5CF0pQhmVwTMc8DwA1g0bO8qq6MgR2FrdmjfZ4`

Local file:
- `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-blank-filled-v2.pdf`

I know this is a bit iterative, but this should be closer now.

If it’s still off, the fastest way is:
- tell me exactly **which page + which fields** are wrong
  for example:
  - “page 1 names still too low”
  - “page 2 current tenancy line too high”
  - “page 3 date/signature line off”

Then I can do a very targeted final adjustment instead of shifting everything again.

Summary: High prompt-cache reuse.

Output:
Got it — I overcorrected downward. I’m nudging the overlay upward a bit across the form and will resend a v3 version.I nudged the placements upward across the three pages. I’m generating a v3 now and will resend it.I moved everything a bit upward and resent it.

Newest version:
- `$x7rHa5CF0pQhmVwTMc8DwA1g0bO8qq6MgR2FrdmjfZ4`

Local file:
- `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-blank-filled-v2.pdf`

I know this is a bit iterative, but this should be closer now.

If it’s still off, the fastest way is:
- tell me exactly **which page + which fields** are wrong
  for example:
  - “page 1 names still too low”
  - “page 2 current tenancy line too high”
  - “page 3 date/signature line off”

Then I can do a very targeted final adjustment instead of shifting everything again.

edit

bash


Understood — I’ll make a small upward adjustment, not a big shift this time, and resend a v4.I made a small upward nudge across the fields. Generating and resending now.I nudged the fields slightly upward and resent it.

Newest version:
- `$QYKTDTOrfO1aEVLmAei0QU5CeZ-LxhBXcBARpBpV9hg`

Local file:
- `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-blank-filled-v2.pdf`

This should be a bit closer without the big overcorrection.

If it’s still not right, the fastest path now is for you to tell me just one or two specific problem areas, like:
- “page 1 left column still low”
- “page 2 current tenancy line still low”
- “page 3 bottom names/date still low”

Then I can make a surgical fix instead of shifting the whole form again.

Summary: High prompt-cache reuse.

Output:
Understood — I’ll make a small upward adjustment, not a big shift this time, and resend a v4.I made a small upward nudge across the fields. Generating and resending now.I nudged the fields slightly upward and resent it.

Newest version:
- `$QYKTDTOrfO1aEVLmAei0QU5CeZ-LxhBXcBARpBpV9hg`

Local file:
- `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-blank-filled-v2.pdf`

This should be a bit closer without the big overcorrection.

If it’s still not right, the fastest path now is for you to tell me just one or two specific problem areas, like:
- “page 1 left column still low”
- “page 2 current tenancy line still low”
- “page 3 bottom names/date still low”

Then I can make a surgical fix instead of shifting the whole form again.

edit

bash

Some fields need to be slightly higher still


I’m reopening the latest PDF I sent so I can visually inspect the current misplacements directly and correct more than just one or two fields this time.I can see the bigger mismatches now — especially on page 1 lower rows and page 2 employment/current-tenancy rows. I’m doing a more targeted correction for those areas and will resend.I adjusted the page 1 lower rows and the page 2 work/current-tenancy rows more aggressively this time. Generating and sending the corrected version now.I fixed the more obviously mismatched areas and resent it.

Newest version:
- `$BQ5xocLEii1lDWkSNbceTx3WFhaPLPKaq4PVtNVtbI8`

Local file:
- `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-blank-filled-v2.pdf`

Main changes this time:
- page 1: names / birth dates / marital status / address / email / landlord blocks
- page 2: employer and address rows moved up into the correct boxes
- page 2: current-tenancy / previous-lease lines shifted closer to the intended lines

If this one is still imperfect, we’re now close enough that a **very narrow last tweak** should do it. If you want, tell me only the remaining bad spots and I’ll adjust just those.

Summary: High prompt-cache reuse.

Output:
I’m reopening the latest PDF I sent so I can visually inspect the current misplacements directly and correct more than just one or two fields this time.I can see the bigger mismatches now — especially on page 1 lower rows and page 2 employment/current-tenancy rows. I’m doing a more targeted correction for those areas and will resend.I adjusted the page 1 lower rows and the page 2 work/current-tenancy rows more aggressively this time. Generating and sending the corrected version now.I fixed the more obviously mismatched areas and resent it.

Newest version:
- `$BQ5xocLEii1lDWkSNbceTx3WFhaPLPKaq4PVtNVtbI8`

Local file:
- `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-blank-filled-v2.pdf`

Main changes this time:
- page 1: names / birth dates / marital status / address / email / landlord blocks
- page 2: employer and address rows moved up into the correct boxes
- page 2: current-tenancy / previous-lease lines shifted closer to the intended lines

If this one is still imperfect, we’re now close enough that a **very narrow last tweak** should do it. If you want, tell me only the remaining bad spots and I’ll adjust just those.

{"filepath":"fill_immoscout_form_overlay_v2.py","diff":"Index: /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/fill_immoscout_form_overlay_v2.py\n===================================================================\n--- /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/fill_immoscout_form_overlay_v2.py\n+++ /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/fill_immoscout_form_overlay_v2.py\n@@ -44,47 +44,47 @@\n draw(c, 266, 507, '300,00')\n draw(c, 266, 484, '2200,00')\n \n lx, rx = 78, 336\n-draw(c, lx, 416, 'Krylov Gleb')\n-draw(c, rx, 416, 'Nikiforova Anastasia')\n-draw(c, lx, 376, '21.04.1982')\n-draw(c, rx, 376, '03.01.1998')\n-draw(c, lx, 340, 'verheiratet')\n-draw(c, rx, 340, 'verheiratet')\n-draw(c, lx, 291, 'Walther-Meißner-Str. 8\\n85748 Garching', 10.1)\n-draw(c, rx, 291, 'Walther-Meißner-Str. 8\\n85748 Garching', 10.1)\n-draw(c, lx, 244, '+49 1575 133 29 45')\n-draw(c, rx, 244, '+49 1575 133 29 50')\n+draw(c, lx, 412, 'Krylov Gleb')\n+draw(c, rx, 412, 'Nikiforova Anastasia')\n+draw(c, lx, 384, '21.04.1982')\n+draw(c, rx, 384, '03.01.1998')\n+draw(c, lx, 352, 'verheiratet')\n+draw(c, rx, 352, 'verheiratet')\n+draw(c, lx, 306, 'Walther-Meißner-Str. 8\\n85748 Garching', 10.1)\n+draw(c, rx

edit

bash

Please fix other fields too, you can see the mismatches


I found two different problems at once:
- page 1 lower rows are still a bit low
- page 2 employment rows are actually sitting one row too low
- page 2 tenancy lines are too high and need to drop down

I’m doing that mixed correction now and will resend.I’ve got the exact current coordinates open now. I’m making the mixed correction I described: page 1 lower blocks slightly up, page 2 employment up, page 2 tenancy lines down.Generating the corrected version now.I corrected the other mismatched areas too and resent a new version:

- `$sVZRLtB_KATb09Dojsj55wPHRfrE0vfyXLzulQIIxSs`

Local file:
- `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-blank-filled-v2.pdf`

This round specifically adjusted:
- page 1 lower half:
  - address
  - private phone
  - email
  - previous landlord
  - landlord address block
- page 2:
  - employer / employer address
  - employed since
  - profession
  - self-employed row
  - income row
  - pets
  - current tenancy line
  - previous tenancy ended line

If this is finally acceptable, great. If not, we’re at the point where the best next step is probably **one last pinpoint fix** based on exactly what still looks wrong to you.

Summary: High prompt-cache reuse.

Output:
I found two different problems at once:
- page 1 lower rows are still a bit low
- page 2 employment rows are actually sitting one row too low
- page 2 tenancy lines are too high and need to drop down

I’m doing that mixed correction now and will resend.I’ve got the exact current coordinates open now. I’m making the mixed correction I described: page 1 lower blocks slightly up, page 2 employment up, page 2 tenancy lines down.Generating the corrected version now.I corrected the other mismatched areas too and resent a new version:

- `$sVZRLtB_KATb09Dojsj55wPHRfrE0vfyXLzulQIIxSs`

Local file:
- `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-blank-filled-v2.pdf`

This round specifically adjusted:
- page 1 lower half:
  - address
  - private phone
  - email
  - previous landlord
  - landlord address block
- page 2:
  - employer / employer address
  - employed since
  - profession
  - self-employed row
  - income row
  - pets
  - current tenancy line
  - previous tenancy ended line

If this is finally acceptable, great. If not, we’re at the point where the best next step is probably **one last pinpoint fix** based on exactly what still looks wrong to you.

{"filepath":"fill_immoscout_form_overlay_v2.py","diff":"Index: /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/fill_immoscout_form_overlay_v2.py\n===================================================================\n--- /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/fill_immoscout_form_overlay_v2.py\n+++ /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/fill_immoscout_form_overlay_v2.py\n@@ -50,41 +50,41 @@\n draw(c, lx, 384, '21.04.1982')\n draw(c, rx, 384, '03.01.1998')\n draw(c, lx, 352, 'verheiratet')\n draw(c, rx, 352, 'verheiratet')\n-draw(c, lx, 306, 'Walther-Meißner-Str. 8\\n85748 Garching', 10.1)\n-draw(c, rx, 306, 'Walther-Meißner-Str. 8\\n85748 Garching', 10.1)\n-draw(c, lx, 253, '+49 1575 133 29 45')\n-draw(c, rx, 253, '+49 1575 133 29 50')\n+draw(c, lx, 300, 'Walther-Meißner-Str. 8\\n85748 Garching', 10.1)\n+draw(c, rx, 300, 'Walther-Meißner-Str. 8\\n85748 Garching', 10.1)\n+draw(c, lx, 248, '+49 1575 133 29 45')\n+draw(c, rx, 248, '+49 1575 133 29 50')\n draw(c, lx, 191, '')\n draw(c, rx, 191, '')\n-draw(c, lx, 209, 'krylov@posteo.net', 10.0)\n-draw(c, rx, 209, 'celticffrost@gmail.com', 9.2)\n-draw(c, lx, 165, 'Familie Pfeuffer')\n-draw(c, rx, 165, 'Familie Pfeuffer')\n-draw(c, lx,

edit

bash

Better but you are still missing a lot of fields, some are okay though


I’m going to inspect the current v6 visually one more time, identify the remaining outliers, and make a smaller finishing pass rather than another broad shift.I can see the remaining trouble spots better now: page 2 middle rows and the tenancy block are still the ugliest. I’m cleaning those up, and I’m also removing some unnecessary dash placeholders so the empty fields don’t look misaligned.I cleaned the page 2 middle section and removed the distracting dash placeholders. Regenerating and resending now.I fixed the page 2 middle block and removed a bunch of distracting placeholder dashes, then resent it.

Newest version:
- `$hrLbz9o0DkrVujdauS2-eWy99x9lmsLtcl2bNuOBIdc`

Local file:
- `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-blank-filled-v2.pdf`

This round specifically improves:
- page 2:
  - employed since
  - profession
  - income row
  - pets
  - current tenancy block
  - previous tenancy ended line
- page 3:
  - removes unnecessary dash placeholders in blank obligation rows

If this still has a few off spots, we’re probably down to tiny manual nudges.

Summary: High prompt-cache reuse.

Output:
I’m going to inspect the current v6 visually one more time, identify the remaining outliers, and make a smaller finishing pass rather than another broad shift.I can see the remaining trouble spots better now: page 2 middle rows and the tenancy block are still the ugliest. I’m cleaning those up, and I’m also removing some unnecessary dash placeholders so the empty fields don’t look misaligned.I cleaned the page 2 middle section and removed the distracting dash placeholders. Regenerating and resending now.I fixed the page 2 middle block and removed a bunch of distracting placeholder dashes, then resent it.

Newest version:
- `$hrLbz9o0DkrVujdauS2-eWy99x9lmsLtcl2bNuOBIdc`

Local file:
- `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-blank-filled-v2.pdf`

This round specifically improves:
- page 2:
  - employed since
  - profession
  - income row
  - pets
  - current tenancy block
  - previous tenancy ended line
- page 3:
  - removes unnecessary dash placeholders in blank obligation rows

If this still has a few off spots, we’re probably down to tiny manual nudges.

{"filepath":"fill_immoscout_form_overlay_v2.py","diff":"Index: /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/fill_immoscout_form_overlay_v2.py\n===================================================================\n--- /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/fill_immoscout_form_overlay_v2.py\n+++ /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/fill_immoscout_form_overlay_v2.py\n@@ -67,36 +67,36 @@\n c.showPage()\n \n # PAGE 2\n draw(c, lx, 727, 'Munich Quantum Instruments GmbH', 9.3)\n-draw(c, rx, 691, '-')\n+draw(c, rx, 691, '')\n draw(c, lx, 679, 'Lichtenbergstr. 8\\n85748 Garching', 9.6)\n-draw(c, rx, 679, '-')\n-draw(c, lx, 623, '01.04.2026')\n-draw(c, rx, 623, '-')\n-draw(c, lx, 589, 'Elektroingenieur')\n-draw(c, rx, 589, 'Studentin')\n-draw(c, lx, 553, '-')\n-draw(c, rx, 553, '-')\n-draw(c, lx, 506, '3922,54')\n-draw(c, rx, 489, '-')\n+draw(c, rx, 679, '')\n+draw(c, lx, 629, '01.04.2026')\n+draw(c, rx, 629, '')\n+draw(c, lx, 595, 'Elektroingenieur')\n+draw(c, rx, 595, 'Studentin')\n+draw(c, lx, 553, '')\n+draw(c, rx, 553, '')\n+draw(c, lx, 520, '3922,54')\n+draw(c, rx, 520, '')\n \n draw(c, 77, 249, '2')\n-draw(c, 242, 158, 'keine')\n-draw(c, 300, 104, 'Derzeit kein Mietverhältni

edit

bash

Much better I think we are converging please fix the remaining fields


I agree — for a fillable PDF, this should be done by actually filling the fields, not by hand-positioning text forever. I’m checking what PDF/form tools are available locally so I can switch to the proper route.Only Python and Ghostscript are available locally right now — no `pdftk`, `qpdf`, or LibreOffice. I’m going to try adding a proper Python PDF form library so I can fill the actual form fields instead of overlaying text.The system Python blocks direct installs, but I can safely use a local virtualenv for this task. I’m creating one now and installing `pypdf` there so I can try real field filling.Good — `pypdf` is installed in a local virtualenv now. I’m inspecting the form with that library next, because it may handle the actual AcroForm fields more cleanly than the raw overlay approach.I confirmed the PDF has proper AcroForm fields, but not for everything. I’m checking the page annotations directly now to see whether the remaining visible blanks are unnamed widgets that I can still fill programmatically.I found the real issue: the PDF actually has **far more fillable fields than I was using** — including the page 1 name/address/contact fields and the page 2/3 lines. So I’m switching away from overlaying and filling the actual widgets directly now.I wrote a proper direct-field filler using the form widgets themselves. Now I’m generating that version.The direct field-filled PDF is generated. I’m reading it back visually now before sending, to confirm whether this finally fixed the alignment problem better than the overlays.I found a better clue: the direct field-filled PDF **does contain the values**, but the visual preview stays blank because the field appearances aren’t being regenerated/rendered properly. That means the next fix is not positioning — it’s **appearance generation / flattening**.I updated the direct-field filler to explicitly regenerate appearances. Now I’m regenerating the PDF and checking whether the values become visible in-page.I found that the form-field version is structurally filled, but the preview still renders blank — meaning the issue is now about **flattening/rendering the filled fields**, not field values themselves. I’m trying a Ghostscript pass to bake the form values into normal page content.Great — Ghostscript flattened it without crashing. I’m opening the flattened version now to see whether the filled values are finally rendered visibly.This is much better: the real form fields are finally rendering. I’m making one last content tweak too — shortening the two tenancy lines so they fit cleanly into the field widths — then I’ll flatten and send that version.I shortened the two overlong tenancy fields. Now I’m regenerating the direct-field version and flattening it again so it stays visible in ordinary PDF viewers.The improved direct-field version is flattened successfully. I’m checking the rendered preview one more time, then I’ll send this one — it looks much more promising than the coordinate overlays.I hit the maximum steps for this agent, so I can’t do more tool work in this turn.

What I accomplished:
- Confirmed the original ImmoScout PDF is only **partly** fillable.
- Found the real blank ImmoScout template and used it as the base.
- Tried three approaches:
  1. full overlay on scanned form
  2. overlay on blank form
  3. direct AcroForm field filling + flattening
- The **best result so far** is the **direct-field + flattened** version.
- I also shortened the long tenancy text so it fits better:
  - **Kein Mietverhältnis**
  - **endete regulär am 01.08.2025**

Best current file:
- `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-direct-fields-flattened.pdf`

Latest visual status:
- **Page 1** now looks pretty good overall.
- **Page 2** is much better too:
  - employer / address / employment date / profession / income / “2 Personen” / “keine” are visible
  - main remaining issue is the long line:
    - `endete regulär am 01.08.2025`
    still looks a bit cramped / clipped
- **Page 3** also renders, but some optional/blank obligation lines are still visually not ideal.

Remaining tasks:
1. Fix the remaining clipped tenancy line on page 2.
2. Check whether page 3 should leave some fields fully blank instead of filled.
3. Send the final corrected PDF once those tiny remaining issues are cleaned up.

Recommendation for next step:
- Continue from the **direct-field approach**, not the overlay approach.
- Only make **small text/content changes**, not coordinate shifts:
  - shorten the second tenancy field even more, e.g.:
    - **befristet bis 01.08.2025**
    or
    - **regulär beendet 01.08.2025**
- Then flatten again and resend.

So the main conclusion is:
- the **field-filling path works better than overlaying**
- we are now down to **small content-fit issues**, not total alignment chaos.

Summary: High prompt-cache reuse.

Output:
I agree — for a fillable PDF, this should be done by actually filling the fields, not by hand-positioning text forever. I’m checking what PDF/form tools are available locally so I can switch to the proper route.Only Python and Ghostscript are available locally right now — no `pdftk`, `qpdf`, or LibreOffice. I’m going to try adding a proper Python PDF form library so I can fill the actual form fields instead of overlaying text.The system Python blocks direct installs, but I can safely use a local virtualenv for this task. I’m creating one now and installing `pypdf` there so I can try real field filling.Good — `pypdf` is installed in a local virtualenv now. I’m inspecting the form with that library next, because it may handle the actual AcroForm fields more cleanly than the raw overlay approach.I confirmed the PDF has proper AcroForm fields, but not for everything. I’m checking the page annotations directly now to see whether the remaining visible blanks are unnamed widgets that I can still fill programmatically.I found the real issue: the PDF actually has **far more fillable fields than I was using** — including the page 1 name/address/contact fields and the page 2/3 lines. So I’m switching away from overlaying and filling the actual widgets directly now.I wrote a proper direct-field filler using the form widgets themselves. Now I’m generating that version.The direct field-filled PDF is generated. I’m reading it back visually now before sending, to confirm whether this finally fixed the alignment problem better than the overlays.I found a better clue: the direct field-filled PDF **does contain the values**, but the visual preview stays blank because the field appearances aren’t being regenerated/rendered properly. That means the next fix is not positioning — it’s **appearance generation / flattening**.I updated the direct-field filler to explicitly regenerate appearances. Now I’m regenerating the PDF and checking whether the values become visible in-page.I found that the form-field version is structurally filled, but the preview still renders blank — meaning the issue is now about **flattening/rendering the filled fields**, not field values themselves. I’m trying a Ghostscript pass to bake the form values into normal page content.Great — Ghostscript flattened it without crashing. I’m opening the flattened version now to see whether the filled values are finally rendered visibly.This is much better: the real form fields are finally rendering. I’m making one last content tweak too — shortening the two tenancy lines so they fit cleanly into the field widths — then I’ll flatten and send that version.I shortened the two overlong tenancy fields. Now I’m regenerating the direct-field version and flattening it again so it stays visible in ordinary PDF viewers.The improved direct-field version is flattened successfully. I’m checking the rendered preview one more time, then I’ll send this one — it looks much more promising than the coordinate overlays.I hit the maximum steps for this agent, so I can’t do more tool work in this turn.

What I accomplished:
- Confirmed the original ImmoScout PDF is only **partly** fillable.
- Found the real blank ImmoScout template and used it as the base.
- Tried three approaches:
  1. full overlay on scanned form
  2. overlay on blank form
  3. direct AcroForm field filling + flattening
- The **best result so far** is the **direct-field + flattened** version.
- I also shortened the long tenancy text so it fits better:
  - **Kein Mietverhältnis**
  - **endete regulär am 01.08.2025**

Best current file:
- `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-direct-fields-flattened.pdf`

Latest visual status:
- **Page 1** now looks pretty good overall.
- **Page 2** is much better too:
  - employer / address / employment date / profession / income / “2 Personen” / “keine” are visible
  - main remaining issue is the long line:
    - `endete regulär am 01.08.2025`
    still looks a bit cramped / clipped
- **Page 3** also renders, but some optional/blank obligation lines are still visually not ideal.

Remaining tasks:
1. Fix the remaining clipped tenancy line on page 2.
2. Check whether page 3 should leave some fields fully blank instead of filled.
3. Send the final corrected PDF once those tiny remaining issues are cleaned up.

Recommendation for next step:
- Continue from the **direct-field approach**, not the overlay approach.
- Only make **small text/content changes**, not coordinate shifts:
  - shorten the second tenancy field even more, e.g.:
    - **befristet bis 01.08.2025**
    or
    - **regulär beendet 01.08.2025**
- Then flatten again and resend.

So the main conclusion is:
- the **field-filling path works better than overlaying**
- we are now down to **small content-fit issues**, not total alignment chaos.

bash

bash

bash

{"filepath":"fill_immoscout_form_fields_direct.py","diff":"Index: /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/fill_immoscout_form_fields_direct.py\n===================================================================\n--- /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/fill_immoscout_form_fields_direct.py\n+++ /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/fill_immoscout_form_fields_direct.py\n@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@\n+from pathlib import Path\n+from pypdf import PdfReader, PdfWriter\n+\n+BASE = Path('/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat')\n+SRC = BASE / 'immoscout-blank-mieterselbstauskunft.pdf'\n+OUT = BASE / 'dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-direct-fields.pdf'\n+\n+reader = PdfReader(str(SRC))\n+writer = PdfWriter()\n+writer.clone_document_from_reader(reader)\n+writer.set_need_appearances_writer(True)\n+\n+page1 = writer.pages[0]\n+page2 = writer.pages[1]\n+page3 = writer.pages[2]\n+\n+writer.update_page_form_field_values(page1, {\n+    '1': 'Auweg 8, 85748 Garching bei München',\n+    '2': '',\n+    'Mietbeginn': '01.08.2026',\n+    'Gewuenschter_Einzugstermin': '01.08.2026',\n+    'Nettokaltmiete': '1100,00',\n+    'Betriebskosten': '300,00',\n+    'Kaution': '2200,00',\n+    'Name

edit

bash

{"filepath":"fill_immoscout_form_fields_direct.py","diff":"Index: /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/fill_immoscout_form_fields_direct.py\n===================================================================\n--- /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/fill_immoscout_form_fields_direct.py\n+++ /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/fill_immoscout_form_fields_direct.py\n@@ -39,9 +39,9 @@\n     'bisheriger Vermieter AnschriftTelefon_1': 'Familie Pfeuffer\\nOlgastr. 3\\n80636 München',\n     'bisheriger Vermieter AnschriftTelefon_2_1': 'Familie Pfeuffer\\nOlgastr. 3\\n80636 München',\n     'bisheriger Vermieter AnschriftTelefon_2': 'Familie Pfeuffer',\n     'bisheriger Vermieter AnschriftTelefon_3': 'Familie Pfeuffer',\n-})\n+}, auto_regenerate=True)\n \n writer.update_page_form_field_values(page2, {\n     'derzeitiger Arbeitgeber AnschriftTelefon': 'Lichtenbergstr. 8\\n85748 Garching',\n     'derzeitiger Arbeitgeber AnschriftTelefon_2': '',\n@@ -83,9 +83,9 @@\n     'Mein  unser derzeitiges Mietverhältnis besteht seit': 'Derzeit kein Mietverhältnis',\n     'wegen': 'Befristetes Mietverhältnis endete regulär am 01.08.2025',\n     'derzeitiger_Arbeitgeber_1': 'Munich Qu

edit

bash

bash

Index: /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/fill_immoscout_form_fields_direct.py
===================================================================
--- /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/fill_immoscout_form_fields_direct.py
+++ /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/fill_immoscout_form_fields_direct.py
@@ -79,10 +79,10 @@
     'GeburtsdatumRow5': '',
     'Eigenes Einkommen nettoRow5': '',
     'In die Wohnung werden': '2',
     'Ich  wir haben folgende Haustiere': 'keine',
-    'Mein  unser derzeitiges Mietverhältnis besteht seit': 'Derzeit kein Mietverhältnis',
-    'wegen': 'Befristetes Mietverhältnis endete regulär am 01.08.2025',
+    'Mein  unser derzeitiges Mietverhältnis besteht seit': 'Kein Mietverhältnis',
+    'wegen': 'endete regulär am 01.08.2025',
     'derzeitiger_Arbeitgeber_1': 'Munich Quantum Instruments GmbH',
     'derzeitiger_Arbeitgeber_2': '',
 }, auto_regenerate=True)

edit

bash

Can you just fill the form fields? Things like mietbeginn are one line down, and the second page looks bad. Maybe we need to install tools etc but an editable form shouldn't be so difficult


I’m proceeding with the proper field-filled version now: sending the **direct-field + flattened** PDF, since that one renders much better than the coordinate-overlay attempts.Done — I sent the **proper direct-field filled + flattened** version here:

- `$OO0GWw_MRnCZz1AFD8I-ydGD8q7DvZVPOsWtCgIxSGo`

This is the one that:
- uses the **real blank ImmoScout form**
- fills the **actual PDF fields**
- then gets **flattened** so the values stay visible in normal viewers

Local file:
- `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-direct-fields-flattened.pdf`

This should be the best version so far.

If this still has issues, then we’re no longer in “alignment guesswork” territory — we can target the exact remaining field content/fit problems from this direct-field version.

Summary: High prompt-cache reuse.

Output:
I’m proceeding with the proper field-filled version now: sending the **direct-field + flattened** PDF, since that one renders much better than the coordinate-overlay attempts.Done — I sent the **proper direct-field filled + flattened** version here:

- `$OO0GWw_MRnCZz1AFD8I-ydGD8q7DvZVPOsWtCgIxSGo`

This is the one that:
- uses the **real blank ImmoScout form**
- fills the **actual PDF fields**
- then gets **flattened** so the values stay visible in normal viewers

Local file:
- `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-direct-fields-flattened.pdf`

This should be the best version so far.

If this still has issues, then we’re no longer in “alignment guesswork” territory — we can target the exact remaining field content/fit problems from this direct-field version.


Great — that’s a very targeted fix now. I’m adjusting just those two fields in the direct-field version:
- shorten the “endete regulär …” line a bit more
- move the “2” entry left by using a shorter form / spacing-friendly value if needed
Then I’ll regenerate and resend.I made the two small field-level adjustments. Now I’m regenerating and flattening the improved version.The tweaked direct-field version is regenerated. I’m sending this almost-final version now.I made those two final field tweaks and resent it:

- `$-rXDH4B_oN8wQdaGgPJZeKN0PiibpPXewzXOJ03WyUk`

Changes:
- shortened the tenancy line to fit better:
  - **regulär beendet 01.08.2025**
- gave the **“2”** a bit more left padding

Local file:
- `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-direct-fields-flattened.pdf`

This should be the best version so far. If there’s still a tiny issue, it’s probably now truly down to one last micro-fix.

Summary: High prompt-cache reuse.

Output:
Great — that’s a very targeted fix now. I’m adjusting just those two fields in the direct-field version:
- shorten the “endete regulär …” line a bit more
- move the “2” entry left by using a shorter form / spacing-friendly value if needed
Then I’ll regenerate and resend.I made the two small field-level adjustments. Now I’m regenerating and flattening the improved version.The tweaked direct-field version is regenerated. I’m sending this almost-final version now.I made those two final field tweaks and resent it:

- `$-rXDH4B_oN8wQdaGgPJZeKN0PiibpPXewzXOJ03WyUk`

Changes:
- shortened the tenancy line to fit better:
  - **regulär beendet 01.08.2025**
- gave the **“2”** a bit more left padding

Local file:
- `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-direct-fields-flattened.pdf`

This should be the best version so far. If there’s still a tiny issue, it’s probably now truly down to one last micro-fix.

Index: /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/fill_immoscout_form_fields_direct.py
===================================================================
--- /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/fill_immoscout_form_fields_direct.py
+++ /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/fill_immoscout_form_fields_direct.py
@@ -77,12 +77,12 @@
     'VornamenRow5': '',
     'Verwandtschafts gradRow5': '',
     'GeburtsdatumRow5': '',
     'Eigenes Einkommen nettoRow5': '',
-    'In die Wohnung werden': '2',
+    'In die Wohnung werden': ' 2',
     'Ich  wir haben folgende Haustiere': 'keine',
     'Mein  unser derzeitiges Mietverhältnis besteht seit': 'Kein Mietverhältnis',
-    'wegen': 'endete regulär am 01.08.2025',
+    'wegen': 'regulär beendet 01.08.2025',
     'derzeitiger_Arbeitgeber_1': 'Munich Quantum Instruments GmbH',
     'derzeitiger_Arbeitgeber_2': '',
 }, auto_regenerate=True)

edit

bash

This is much much better and almost there, just endete regular got truncated and 2 can use a bit of space on the left


Perfect — that’s narrow enough.

I’m making just these last two tweaks:
- give **2200** a little more left padding
- shorten the tenancy line again so the year is definitely visible

Then I’ll regenerate and resend.Regenerating the flattened direct-field version now with those two final tweaks.Sending the tweaked final version now.Done — I made those two micro-fixes and sent the updated version here:

- `$gLId9mcyd0EfD68YoIZqHuHoxVRe2Ym2hEeDWh0_EwA`

Changes:
- **2200** shifted a bit left
- tenancy line shortened again to:
  - **bis 01.08.2025 befristet**

Local file:
- `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-direct-fields-flattened.pdf`

This should hopefully be the final usable one.

Summary: High prompt-cache reuse.

Output:
Perfect — that’s narrow enough.

I’m making just these last two tweaks:
- give **2200** a little more left padding
- shorten the tenancy line again so the year is definitely visible

Then I’ll regenerate and resend.Regenerating the flattened direct-field version now with those two final tweaks.Sending the tweaked final version now.Done — I made those two micro-fixes and sent the updated version here:

- `$gLId9mcyd0EfD68YoIZqHuHoxVRe2Ym2hEeDWh0_EwA`

Changes:
- **2200** shifted a bit left
- tenancy line shortened again to:
  - **bis 01.08.2025 befristet**

Local file:
- `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-direct-fields-flattened.pdf`

This should hopefully be the final usable one.

{"filepath":"fill_immoscout_form_fields_direct.py","diff":"Index: /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/fill_immoscout_form_fields_direct.py\n===================================================================\n--- /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/fill_immoscout_form_fields_direct.py\n+++ /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/fill_immoscout_form_fields_direct.py\n@@ -80,9 +80,9 @@\n     'Eigenes Einkommen nettoRow5': '',\n     'In die Wohnung werden': ' 2',\n     'Ich  wir haben folgende Haustiere': 'keine',\n     'Mein  unser derzeitiges Mietverhältnis besteht seit': 'Kein Mietverhältnis',\n-    'wegen': 'regulär beendet 01.08.2025',\n+    'wegen': 'bis 01.08.2025 befristet',\n     'derzeitiger_Arbeitgeber_1': 'Munich Quantum Instruments GmbH',\n     'derzeitiger_Arbeitgeber_2': '',\n }, auto_regenerate=True)\n \n@@ -93,9 +93,9 @@\n     '€ monatlich bis zum_2': '',\n     'Eine bis zum': '',\n     'in Höhe von': '',\n     'Sonstige Verpflichtungen in Höhe von': '',\n-    'Ich bin  wir sind in der Lage eine Mietsicherheit von': '2200',\n+    'Ich bin  wir sind in der Lage eine Mietsicherheit von': ' 2200',\n     'undefined_2': 'München',\n     'den': '13.06.20

edit

bash

2200 can also use a bit of space on the left. The beendet year is still truncated. Otherwise it's good


Yes — very likely.

What’s happening is probably one of these:
1. the field has a **fixed width**
2. the viewer/font uses a size that is too large for that field
3. after flattening, the rendered appearance clips at the field boundary

So yes, it’s probably not “your text is wrong”, but a **field/appearance limit**.

## Best practical fix
Use an even shorter text, for example:

- **bis 01.08.2025 befristet**
or even shorter:
- **befristet bis 01.08.2025**
or shortest:
- **Ende 01.08.2025**

I think **“befristet bis 01.08.2025”** is probably the safest:
- short
- neutral
- clear
- should fit better

## If we want a stronger technical fix
Yes, in principle we could also:
- reduce font size in that field appearance
- or avoid flattening until after a different rendering path
- or use a better PDF form toolchain

But for this one field, the easiest and safest fix is just:
- **shorter wording**

## My recommendation
Change that field to:
- **befristet bis 01.08.2025**

That is probably the best compromise.

If you want, I can make that one last change and resend immediately.

Summary: High prompt-cache reuse.

Output:
Yes — very likely.

What’s happening is probably one of these:
1. the field has a **fixed width**
2. the viewer/font uses a size that is too large for that field
3. after flattening, the rendered appearance clips at the field boundary

So yes, it’s probably not “your text is wrong”, but a **field/appearance limit**.

## Best practical fix
Use an even shorter text, for example:

- **bis 01.08.2025 befristet**
or even shorter:
- **befristet bis 01.08.2025**
or shortest:
- **Ende 01.08.2025**

I think **“befristet bis 01.08.2025”** is probably the safest:
- short
- neutral
- clear
- should fit better

## If we want a stronger technical fix
Yes, in principle we could also:
- reduce font size in that field appearance
- or avoid flattening until after a different rendering path
- or use a better PDF form toolchain

But for this one field, the easiest and safest fix is just:
- **shorter wording**

## My recommendation
Change that field to:
- **befristet bis 01.08.2025**

That is probably the best compromise.

If you want, I can make that one last change and resend immediately.

Is it possible to make that line not truncated? The form probably has some limit?


I’ll do the minimal safe fix: keep the good direct-field PDF, cover just that one truncated field, and rewrite it with the shorter text **“befristet bis 01.08.2025”** in a slightly smaller font. Then I’ll resend.I wrote a tiny patcher just for that one field. Now I’m generating the corrected PDF and sending it.Done — I patched just that tenancy line with a smaller font and the shorter wording:

- **befristet bis 01.08.2025**

Sent file:
- `$AbaD3yvlnClXvkksXe5PTpKxM9wK4W8JjGGGD-l76yM`

Local file:
- `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-direct-fields-flattened-v2.pdf`

This should preserve the good direct-field version while fixing the one field that was still getting clipped.

Summary: High prompt-cache reuse.

Output:
I’ll do the minimal safe fix: keep the good direct-field PDF, cover just that one truncated field, and rewrite it with the shorter text **“befristet bis 01.08.2025”** in a slightly smaller font. Then I’ll resend.I wrote a tiny patcher just for that one field. Now I’m generating the corrected PDF and sending it.Done — I patched just that tenancy line with a smaller font and the shorter wording:

- **befristet bis 01.08.2025**

Sent file:
- `$AbaD3yvlnClXvkksXe5PTpKxM9wK4W8JjGGGD-l76yM`

Local file:
- `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-direct-fields-flattened-v2.pdf`

This should preserve the good direct-field version while fixing the one field that was still getting clipped.

{"filepath":"patch_dudium_tenancy_line.py","diff":"Index: /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/patch_dudium_tenancy_line.py\n===================================================================\n--- /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/patch_dudium_tenancy_line.py\n+++ /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/patch_dudium_tenancy_line.py\n@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@\n+from pathlib import Path\n+\n+import pikepdf\n+from reportlab.lib.colors import white, black\n+from reportlab.lib.pagesizes import A4\n+from reportlab.pdfbase import pdfmetrics\n+from reportlab.pdfbase.ttfonts import TTFont\n+from reportlab.pdfgen import canvas\n+\n+BASE = Path('/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat')\n+SRC = BASE / 'dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-direct-fields-flattened.pdf'\n+OVERLAY = BASE / 'dudium-tenancy-line-overlay.pdf'\n+OUT = BASE / 'dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-direct-fields-flattened-v2.pdf'\n+\n+font_paths = [\n+    '/usr/share/fonts/truetype/dejavu/DejaVuSans.ttf',\n+    '/usr/share/fonts/truetype/liberation2/LiberationSans-Regular.ttf',\n+]\n+FONT = 'Helvetica'\n+for fp in font_paths:\n+    p = Path(fp)\n+    if p.exists():\n+        pdfmetrics.registerFont(TTFont('Patc

edit

bash

Slightly reduce font size for that field if you can, but yes to befristed


Yes — that’s the right fix. I’ll patch that single field properly: blank out the old field content region first, then center the new shorter text inside that field before resending.I updated the patch so it first clears that field region and then centers the shorter text inside it. Regenerating and resending now.Done — I patched that field properly this time:

- cleared the old text region
- centered **“befristet bis 01.08.2025”**
- resent the updated PDF

New file:
- `$wQj7ZLyTkgdNJMRRebMstACBhyJI88cscPuWJ6jH8Kc`

Local file:
- `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-direct-fields-flattened-v2.pdf`

That should look cleaner than the previous patch.

Summary: High prompt-cache reuse.

Output:
Yes — that’s the right fix. I’ll patch that single field properly: blank out the old field content region first, then center the new shorter text inside that field before resending.I updated the patch so it first clears that field region and then centers the shorter text inside it. Regenerating and resending now.Done — I patched that field properly this time:

- cleared the old text region
- centered **“befristet bis 01.08.2025”**
- resent the updated PDF

New file:
- `$wQj7ZLyTkgdNJMRRebMstACBhyJI88cscPuWJ6jH8Kc`

Local file:
- `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-direct-fields-flattened-v2.pdf`

That should look cleaner than the previous patch.

Index: /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/patch_dudium_tenancy_line.py
===================================================================
--- /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/patch_dudium_tenancy_line.py
+++ /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/patch_dudium_tenancy_line.py
@@ -34,10 +34,15 @@
 # Add a white patch a bit larger, then write smaller text.
 c.setFillColor(white)
 c.rect(98, 60, 138, 18, fill=1, stroke=0)
 c.setFillColor(black)
-c.setFont(FONT, 7.4)
-c.drawString(102, 66, 'befristet bis 01.08.2025')
+c.setFont(FONT, 7.2)
+text = 'befristet bis 01.08.2025'
+width = c.stringWidth(text, FONT, 7.2)
+field_x = 98
+field_w = 138
+x = field_x + (field_w - width) / 2
+c.drawString(x, 66, text)
 c.showPage()

 # blank page 3
 c.showPage()

edit

bash

If you're going to overlay it like that you need to remove old text from that field and center it better


Got it — the underlying field text is still visible, so I need to blank a **larger area** than just the text baseline and center the replacement more carefully. I’m widening the whiteout patch and re-centering the text inside that full field region now.I enlarged the patch region and tightened the font slightly so it can sit centered without colliding. Regenerating and resending now.I widened the whiteout patch and re-centered the text more carefully, then resent it:

- `$ALrRZK5gWplfNUIfMLVsUsfigWwOguQxXNUPyM-085I`

Local file:
- `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-direct-fields-flattened-v2.pdf`

This should remove more of the old field rendering underneath and center the replacement better.

Summary: High prompt-cache reuse.

Output:
Got it — the underlying field text is still visible, so I need to blank a **larger area** than just the text baseline and center the replacement more carefully. I’m widening the whiteout patch and re-centering the text inside that full field region now.I enlarged the patch region and tightened the font slightly so it can sit centered without colliding. Regenerating and resending now.I widened the whiteout patch and re-centered the text more carefully, then resent it:

- `$ALrRZK5gWplfNUIfMLVsUsfigWwOguQxXNUPyM-085I`

Local file:
- `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-direct-fields-flattened-v2.pdf`

This should remove more of the old field rendering underneath and center the replacement better.

{"filepath":"patch_dudium_tenancy_line.py","diff":"Index: /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/patch_dudium_tenancy_line.py\n===================================================================\n--- /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/patch_dudium_tenancy_line.py\n+++ /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/patch_dudium_tenancy_line.py\n@@ -30,19 +30,19 @@\n c.showPage()\n \n # Page 2: patch only the truncated tenancy-reason line.\n # Original field rect from form inspection: [103.32, 63.24, 225.72, 74.04]\n-# Add a white patch a bit larger, then write smaller text.\n+# Wipe a clearly larger area so the old rendered field content disappears.\n c.setFillColor(white)\n-c.rect(98, 60, 138, 18, fill=1, stroke=0)\n+c.rect(96, 57, 145, 24, fill=1, stroke=0)\n c.setFillColor(black)\n-c.setFont(FONT, 7.2)\n+c.setFont(FONT, 7.0)\n text = 'befristet bis 01.08.2025'\n-width = c.stringWidth(text, FONT, 7.2)\n-field_x = 98\n-field_w = 138\n+width = c.stringWidth(text, FONT, 7.0)\n+field_x = 96\n+field_w = 145\n x = field_x + (field_w - width) / 2\n-c.drawString(x, 66, text)\n+c.drawString(x, 66.5, text)\n c.showPage()\n \n # blank page 3\n c.showPage()\n\n","files":["[object O

edit

bash

That field is still out in the form which collides with your overlay. It can also be centered better


Understood — I’ll stop overlaying completely.

I’m switching back to the **pure field-filled version only**, and I’ll shorten that one problematic field enough that it fits by itself. Then I’ll resend that clean direct-field PDF.I shortened the tenancy field to the minimum sensible wording and removed the extra padding hack from the “2” field. Now I’m regenerating the pure direct-field version and flattening it for viewing.The pure field-filled version is regenerated. I’m sending this non-overlay version now.Done — I resent the **pure direct-field filled** version, with **no overlay patching** on that problematic line.

Sent file:
- `$jeSjhGsEijn5qFicCj8F4Yy1ct-s7-AIsOcbihtbyMU`

What changed:
- the tenancy field is now just:
  - **Ende 01.08.2025**
- the **2** field is back to a normal direct fill
- no extra overlay patch on top of that field

Local file:
- `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-direct-fields-flattened.pdf`

This is now the cleanest “just fill the fields” version.

Summary: High prompt-cache reuse.

Output:
Understood — I’ll stop overlaying completely.

I’m switching back to the **pure field-filled version only**, and I’ll shorten that one problematic field enough that it fits by itself. Then I’ll resend that clean direct-field PDF.I shortened the tenancy field to the minimum sensible wording and removed the extra padding hack from the “2” field. Now I’m regenerating the pure direct-field version and flattening it for viewing.The pure field-filled version is regenerated. I’m sending this non-overlay version now.Done — I resent the **pure direct-field filled** version, with **no overlay patching** on that problematic line.

Sent file:
- `$jeSjhGsEijn5qFicCj8F4Yy1ct-s7-AIsOcbihtbyMU`

What changed:
- the tenancy field is now just:
  - **Ende 01.08.2025**
- the **2** field is back to a normal direct fill
- no extra overlay patch on top of that field

Local file:
- `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-direct-fields-flattened.pdf`

This is now the cleanest “just fill the fields” version.

Index: /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/fill_immoscout_form_fields_direct.py
===================================================================
--- /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/fill_immoscout_form_fields_direct.py
+++ /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/fill_immoscout_form_fields_direct.py
@@ -77,12 +77,12 @@
     'VornamenRow5': '',
     'Verwandtschafts gradRow5': '',
     'GeburtsdatumRow5': '',
     'Eigenes Einkommen nettoRow5': '',
-    'In die Wohnung werden': ' 2',
+    'In die Wohnung werden': '2',
     'Ich  wir haben folgende Haustiere': 'keine',
     'Mein  unser derzeitiges Mietverhältnis besteht seit': 'Kein Mietverhältnis',
-    'wegen': 'bis 01.08.2025 befristet',
+    'wegen': 'Ende 01.08.2025',
     'derzeitiger_Arbeitgeber_1': 'Munich Quantum Instruments GmbH',
     'derzeitiger_Arbeitgeber_2': '',
 }, auto_regenerate=True)

edit

bash

Okay forget it just fill out the form field so it's short enough, don't do overlay you are missing it


Sorry — that’s frustrating.

I’m saving two reusable things now:
1. a **generic filled Selbstauskunft** with your personal data but **without apartment-specific header values**
2. a short **workflow note** for future reuse so we can refill only the header next time.I saved the reusable generic filler and a workflow note. Now I’m generating the generic non-apartment-specific PDF on disk so it’s ready for reuse next time.Done.

I saved the reusable generic version and the workflow for future use.

Saved files:
- **Blank ImmoScout template**
  - `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/immoscout-blank-mieterselbstauskunft.pdf`
- **Generic filled form with your data, no apartment-specific header**
  - `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/mieterselbstauskunft-generic-direct-fields.pdf`
- **Flattened generic version**
  - `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/mieterselbstauskunft-generic-direct-fields-flattened.pdf`
- **Workflow note**
  - `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/immoscout-selbstauskunft-workflow.md`

What this gives us next time:
- we can reuse the **generic personal data form**
- and only fill:
  - apartment address
  - move-in date
  - cold rent
  - Nebenkosten
  - Kaution
- then export a fresh listing-specific PDF

So yes — the reusable base is now saved for future applications.

Summary: High prompt-cache reuse.

Output:
Sorry — that’s frustrating.

I’m saving two reusable things now:
1. a **generic filled Selbstauskunft** with your personal data but **without apartment-specific header values**
2. a short **workflow note** for future reuse so we can refill only the header next time.I saved the reusable generic filler and a workflow note. Now I’m generating the generic non-apartment-specific PDF on disk so it’s ready for reuse next time.Done.

I saved the reusable generic version and the workflow for future use.

Saved files:
- **Blank ImmoScout template**
  - `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/immoscout-blank-mieterselbstauskunft.pdf`
- **Generic filled form with your data, no apartment-specific header**
  - `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/mieterselbstauskunft-generic-direct-fields.pdf`
- **Flattened generic version**
  - `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/mieterselbstauskunft-generic-direct-fields-flattened.pdf`
- **Workflow note**
  - `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/immoscout-selbstauskunft-workflow.md`

What this gives us next time:
- we can reuse the **generic personal data form**
- and only fill:
  - apartment address
  - move-in date
  - cold rent
  - Nebenkosten
  - Kaution
- then export a fresh listing-specific PDF

So yes — the reusable base is now saved for future applications.

{"filepath":"fill_immoscout_form_fields_generic.py, immoscout-selbstauskunft-workflow.md","diff":"Index: /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/fill_immoscout_form_fields_generic.py\n===================================================================\n--- /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/fill_immoscout_form_fields_generic.py\n+++ /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/fill_immoscout_form_fields_generic.py\n@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@\n+from pathlib import Path\n+from pypdf import PdfReader, PdfWriter\n+\n+BASE = Path('/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat')\n+SRC = BASE / 'immoscout-blank-mieterselbstauskunft.pdf'\n+OUT = BASE / 'mieterselbstauskunft-generic-direct-fields.pdf'\n+\n+reader = PdfReader(str(SRC))\n+writer = PdfWriter()\n+writer.clone_document_from_reader(reader)\n+writer.set_need_appearances_writer(True)\n+\n+page1 = writer.pages[0]\n+page2 = writer.pages[1]\n+page3 = writer.pages[2]\n+\n+# Apartment-specific header intentionally left blank for reuse.\n+writer.update_page_form_field_values(page1, {\n+    '1': '',\n+    '2': '',\n+    'Mietbeginn': '',\n+    'Gewuenschter_Einzugstermin': '',\n+    'Nettokaltmiete': '',\n+    'Betriebskosten': '',\n+

edit

bash

Nah he rejected me, see the inbox. Save the form without the apartment specific header though, we will need it again and then you can fill just the header. Save also the workflow for the future


I’ll save these into a reusable application-docs folder in the workspace now, so we can grab them quickly for future applications. I’ll keep the filenames clear and stable.The workspace is there; I’m creating a small `application-docs/` folder and copying the attached PDFs into it with stable names.Saved successfully. I’m listing the folder once so you have the exact paths for reuse.Saved.

Reusable paths:
- `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/application-docs/2-schufa.pdf`
- `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/application-docs/3-arbeitsvertrag.pdf`

I only had those **two** PDFs in the latest attachments.
I did **not** see salary slips in that batch, so if you send them too, I can save them in the same folder.

Summary: High prompt-cache reuse.

Output:
I’ll save these into a reusable application-docs folder in the workspace now, so we can grab them quickly for future applications. I’ll keep the filenames clear and stable.The workspace is there; I’m creating a small `application-docs/` folder and copying the attached PDFs into it with stable names.Saved successfully. I’m listing the folder once so you have the exact paths for reuse.Saved.

Reusable paths:
- `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/application-docs/2-schufa.pdf`
- `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/application-docs/3-arbeitsvertrag.pdf`

I only had those **two** PDFs in the latest attachments.
I did **not** see salary slips in that batch, so if you send them too, I can save them in the same folder.

bash

Please save these other PDF with my salary slips and schufa and work contract so we can quickly send them later


Great — I’m saving these two salary slip PDFs into the same reusable `application-docs/` folder now.Saved. I’m listing the folder again so you have the updated reusable document set.Saved.

Your reusable application-docs set is now:

- `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/application-docs/2-schufa.pdf`
- `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/application-docs/3-arbeitsvertrag.pdf`
- `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/application-docs/4-gehaltsabrechnung-2026-04-april.pdf`
- `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/application-docs/5-gehaltsabrechnung-2026-05-mai.pdf`

So next time we can assemble:
- generic Selbstauskunft
- SCHUFA
- work contract
- salary slips

pretty quickly.

Summary: High prompt-cache reuse.

Output:
Great — I’m saving these two salary slip PDFs into the same reusable `application-docs/` folder now.Saved. I’m listing the folder again so you have the updated reusable document set.Saved.

Your reusable application-docs set is now:

- `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/application-docs/2-schufa.pdf`
- `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/application-docs/3-arbeitsvertrag.pdf`
- `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/application-docs/4-gehaltsabrechnung-2026-04-april.pdf`
- `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/application-docs/5-gehaltsabrechnung-2026-05-mai.pdf`

So next time we can assemble:
- generic Selbstauskunft
- SCHUFA
- work contract
- salary slips

pretty quickly.

bash


I’m starting a fresh live ImmoScout search pass now and I’ll focus first on the best remaining Landkreis zones:
- core north belt again for anything newly appeared
- then nearby backups like **Neufahrn / Eching / Kirchheim** if the core is still thin.The new search session hit the usual robot/cookie gate immediately, so I’m checking the exact page state and then I’ll decide the cleanest way through it.The snapshot is too large to return cleanly, so I’m sidestepping it: I’ll go to the homepage first, log in normally, and then search from there. That has been more reliable than deep-linking straight into results.I’m using the known stable controls directly now: accept cookies, then log in with the normal SSO flow.Good — the session is on the normal ImmoScout login page now. I’m logging in and then I’ll open the search areas we care about.The SSO page has one of their slightly different login variants again. I’m grabbing the live controls and then I’ll use the actual email field rather than the button-like email CTA.I’m back on a clean login page in the fresh search session, so I can continue the actual flat search once you’re ready.

And yes — I can start with:
- **Neufahrn 168398031**
- then **Eching 168252005**

If you want me to proceed now, I can do that next.I’m ready to continue the search/application pipeline.

Current best next targets from the surrounding Landkreis pass remain:
1. **Neufahrn — 168398031**
2. **Eching — 168252005**

I’m also back at a clean ImmoScout login page in the fresh search session, so the next step is straightforward.

If you want to continue right now, I’ll start with **168398031** first.

Summary: High prompt-cache reuse.

Output:
I’m starting a fresh live ImmoScout search pass now and I’ll focus first on the best remaining Landkreis zones:
- core north belt again for anything newly appeared
- then nearby backups like **Neufahrn / Eching / Kirchheim** if the core is still thin.The new search session hit the usual robot/cookie gate immediately, so I’m checking the exact page state and then I’ll decide the cleanest way through it.The snapshot is too large to return cleanly, so I’m sidestepping it: I’ll go to the homepage first, log in normally, and then search from there. That has been more reliable than deep-linking straight into results.I’m using the known stable controls directly now: accept cookies, then log in with the normal SSO flow.Good — the session is on the normal ImmoScout login page now. I’m logging in and then I’ll open the search areas we care about.The SSO page has one of their slightly different login variants again. I’m grabbing the live controls and then I’ll use the actual email field rather than the button-like email CTA.I’m back on a clean login page in the fresh search session, so I can continue the actual flat search once you’re ready.

And yes — I can start with:
- **Neufahrn 168398031**
- then **Eching 168252005**

If you want me to proceed now, I can do that next.I’m ready to continue the search/application pipeline.

Current best next targets from the surrounding Landkreis pass remain:
1. **Neufahrn — 168398031**
2. **Eching — 168252005**

I’m also back at a clean ImmoScout login page in the fresh search session, so the next step is straightforward.

If you want to continue right now, I’ll start with **168398031** first.


I’m doing a fresh premium re-check of the core north belt again:
- **Garching**
- **Ismaning**
- **Oberschleißheim**
- **Unterschleißheim**

I’ll look specifically for newly appeared or newly-promoted results, not the stale ones we already contacted.Password step is up. I’m logging in and then I’ll refresh the four core-area result pages in tabs.Logged in. I’m opening fresh result tabs for Garching, Ismaning, Oberschleißheim, and Unterschleißheim now.All four fresh result pages are open. I’m extracting the current listing cards from each so I can spot any genuinely new private/exclusive 2-room options.Fresh re-check of the **core four**:

## Garching
There is **one actually new 2-room result**:
- **168496704**
- **2 Zi**
- **65 m²**
- **870 €**
- **von privat**
- **EBK + Balkon**
- marked **Neu**
- still a bit suspiciously cheap, but not automatically junk
- this is the most interesting genuinely new Garching result right now

Also still there:
- **168208543** — 87 m², but Nachvermietung
- **168197243** — already contacted
- **106643294** — Dudium, active but already replied

## Ismaning
Not much truly new:
- **168179881** — already contacted, then rejected
- **168198096** — already contacted
- **167796832** — still the 71 m² **Nachvermietung**
- **167921620** — older 52 m² one, still not attractive enough
- a lot of 3-room / furnished / not-better options

So **no strong new Ismaning winner**.

## Oberschleißheim
A couple of things, but mostly still weak:
- **168509443** — **new**, but **3 rooms**, 69 m², 1.250 €
- **168331752** — known 2-room, still there
- **168010269** — 2-room, but **Nachvermietung ab Aug**
- **166141329** — clean 2-room but too expensive
- lots of 1-room / furnished / project noise

So **no clearly better new 2-room Oberschleißheim listing**.

## Unterschleißheim
Some new movement, but mostly not better:
- **168510295** — **new** 2-room, 55 m², but **Nachvermietung**
- **168444839** — 2-room, **möbliert**, 1.250 €
- **167240334** — still there, 61 m², 1.281 €
- **161486970** — still there, 60 m², 1.280 €, EBK
- **168326495** — already contacted
- **168196462** — already contacted

## Bottom line
The **best genuinely new thing in the priority areas right now** is probably:

### **168496704 — Garching**
- 2 rooms
- 65 m²
- 870 €
- private
- EBK + Balkon
- newly appeared

After that, the only leftovers are mostly:
- **168510295** — Unterschleißheim, but Nachvermietung
- **167240334** — Unterschleißheim, pricier
- **161486970** — Unterschleißheim, pricier
- **168010269** — Oberschleißheim, but Nachvermietung

So if you want, I’d try:
1. **168496704** first
2. then maybe **167240334** or **161486970**
3. only then the Nachvermietung options

If you want, I can start with **168496704** now.

Summary: High prompt-cache reuse.

Output:
I’m doing a fresh premium re-check of the core north belt again:
- **Garching**
- **Ismaning**
- **Oberschleißheim**
- **Unterschleißheim**

I’ll look specifically for newly appeared or newly-promoted results, not the stale ones we already contacted.Password step is up. I’m logging in and then I’ll refresh the four core-area result pages in tabs.Logged in. I’m opening fresh result tabs for Garching, Ismaning, Oberschleißheim, and Unterschleißheim now.All four fresh result pages are open. I’m extracting the current listing cards from each so I can spot any genuinely new private/exclusive 2-room options.Fresh re-check of the **core four**:

## Garching
There is **one actually new 2-room result**:
- **168496704**
- **2 Zi**
- **65 m²**
- **870 €**
- **von privat**
- **EBK + Balkon**
- marked **Neu**
- still a bit suspiciously cheap, but not automatically junk
- this is the most interesting genuinely new Garching result right now

Also still there:
- **168208543** — 87 m², but Nachvermietung
- **168197243** — already contacted
- **106643294** — Dudium, active but already replied

## Ismaning
Not much truly new:
- **168179881** — already contacted, then rejected
- **168198096** — already contacted
- **167796832** — still the 71 m² **Nachvermietung**
- **167921620** — older 52 m² one, still not attractive enough
- a lot of 3-room / furnished / not-better options

So **no strong new Ismaning winner**.

## Oberschleißheim
A couple of things, but mostly still weak:
- **168509443** — **new**, but **3 rooms**, 69 m², 1.250 €
- **168331752** — known 2-room, still there
- **168010269** — 2-room, but **Nachvermietung ab Aug**
- **166141329** — clean 2-room but too expensive
- lots of 1-room / furnished / project noise

So **no clearly better new 2-room Oberschleißheim listing**.

## Unterschleißheim
Some new movement, but mostly not better:
- **168510295** — **new** 2-room, 55 m², but **Nachvermietung**
- **168444839** — 2-room, **möbliert**, 1.250 €
- **167240334** — still there, 61 m², 1.281 €
- **161486970** — still there, 60 m², 1.280 €, EBK
- **168326495** — already contacted
- **168196462** — already contacted

## Bottom line
The **best genuinely new thing in the priority areas right now** is probably:

### **168496704 — Garching**
- 2 rooms
- 65 m²
- 870 €
- private
- EBK + Balkon
- newly appeared

After that, the only leftovers are mostly:
- **168510295** — Unterschleißheim, but Nachvermietung
- **167240334** — Unterschleißheim, pricier
- **161486970** — Unterschleißheim, pricier
- **168010269** — Oberschleißheim, but Nachvermietung

So if you want, I’d try:
1. **168496704** first
2. then maybe **167240334** or **161486970**
3. only then the Nachvermietung options

If you want, I can start with **168496704** now.

Try Garching, ismaning, schleissheims new ones


I’m zooming in on **Garching** now and opening the promising current results directly so I can filter out traps like furnished/buyout, late move-in, or weird tenant-gatekeeper cases.I have the three relevant Garching exposes open. Now I’m extracting the details that matter for us: move-in, kitchen, furnished/buyout hints, and whether they look direct/clean vs. tenant-gatekeeper junk.Closer look at **Garching**:

## Best new Garching candidate
### **168496704**
- **2 rooms**
- **65 m²**
- **870 € cold / 1.200 € warm**
- **EBK**
- **Balkon**
- **Bezugsfrei ab 1.7.2026**
- **von privat**
- **not furnished**
- **not Nachvermietung**
- pets: **No**

This is the **cleanest new Garching option** right now.

### Caveats
- price is **very low** for Garching + 65 m², so expect:
  - high competition
  - maybe some hidden catch
- from the expose text:
  - **Kaution is actually 2.500 €**, not 2.200
  - duplex / maisonette layout
  - published **13.06.2026**
  - already high interest:
    - views ~627
    - saved ~136
    - contacted ~100

Still, it looks **real enough to try**.

---

## Second Garching option
### **168495316**
- **2.5 rooms**
- **65 m²**
- **870 € cold / 1.200 € warm**
- **EBK**
- **Balkon/Terrasse**
- **Bezugsfrei ab 1.8.2026**
- **Bald verfügbar**
- **not Nachvermietung**
- pets: **No**

This is also surprisingly decent.

### Caveats
- not fully published yet
- **2.610 € Kaution**
- internet only showed **up to 50 MBit/s**
- “Bald verfügbar” means some details may still shift

---

## Bad / skip
### **168208543**
- definitely **Nachvermietung**
- explicitly says tenant may discuss furniture takeover
- this is exactly the two-sided annoying flow you dislike

So I would **skip this one** unless we get desperate.

---

## My practical ranking
1. **168496704** — best
2. **168495316** — also worth trying
3. **168208543** — skip for now

So yes: **there are 2 actually plausible Garching options right now**.

If you want, I’d start with **168496704** immediately, then **168495316**.

Summary: High prompt-cache reuse.

Output:
I’m zooming in on **Garching** now and opening the promising current results directly so I can filter out traps like furnished/buyout, late move-in, or weird tenant-gatekeeper cases.I have the three relevant Garching exposes open. Now I’m extracting the details that matter for us: move-in, kitchen, furnished/buyout hints, and whether they look direct/clean vs. tenant-gatekeeper junk.Closer look at **Garching**:

## Best new Garching candidate
### **168496704**
- **2 rooms**
- **65 m²**
- **870 € cold / 1.200 € warm**
- **EBK**
- **Balkon**
- **Bezugsfrei ab 1.7.2026**
- **von privat**
- **not furnished**
- **not Nachvermietung**
- pets: **No**

This is the **cleanest new Garching option** right now.

### Caveats
- price is **very low** for Garching + 65 m², so expect:
  - high competition
  - maybe some hidden catch
- from the expose text:
  - **Kaution is actually 2.500 €**, not 2.200
  - duplex / maisonette layout
  - published **13.06.2026**
  - already high interest:
    - views ~627
    - saved ~136
    - contacted ~100

Still, it looks **real enough to try**.

---

## Second Garching option
### **168495316**
- **2.5 rooms**
- **65 m²**
- **870 € cold / 1.200 € warm**
- **EBK**
- **Balkon/Terrasse**
- **Bezugsfrei ab 1.8.2026**
- **Bald verfügbar**
- **not Nachvermietung**
- pets: **No**

This is also surprisingly decent.

### Caveats
- not fully published yet
- **2.610 € Kaution**
- internet only showed **up to 50 MBit/s**
- “Bald verfügbar” means some details may still shift

---

## Bad / skip
### **168208543**
- definitely **Nachvermietung**
- explicitly says tenant may discuss furniture takeover
- this is exactly the two-sided annoying flow you dislike

So I would **skip this one** unless we get desperate.

---

## My practical ranking
1. **168496704** — best
2. **168495316** — also worth trying
3. **168208543** — skip for now

So yes: **there are 2 actually plausible Garching options right now**.

If you want, I’d start with **168496704** immediately, then **168495316**.


I’m proceeding with **168496704** now: I’ll open the contact form, adapt the message to the listing, and get it to the captcha/send step.There are multiple contact buttons on this listing, which is fine. I’m targeting the sidebar contact button directly.The contact form is open on the direct route. I’m checking the live form state first, then I’ll replace any carried-over text with a listing-specific Garching message.This form is still in the weaker anonymous state, so I’m switching it into the real logged-in path first before sending.I’m checking the actual input values directly — sometimes this form looks anonymous at first glance even when your saved data is already present.Good enough — the form has your core identity data already present, so I’m filling the listing-specific message and trying the send path.Good — **168496704** is at the live captcha step now. I’m extracting the original captcha image and sending it here.I started with the new Garching listing **168496704** and got it to the live captcha step.

I sent the **original captcha image** here:
- `$5hEXtVpa53qlJl-U87sLVMqjlU4qiQDgkcMgcM5S7TI`

Please read that captcha and send me the text exactly. Then I’ll submit it.

Summary: High prompt-cache reuse.

Output:
I’m proceeding with **168496704** now: I’ll open the contact form, adapt the message to the listing, and get it to the captcha/send step.There are multiple contact buttons on this listing, which is fine. I’m targeting the sidebar contact button directly.The contact form is open on the direct route. I’m checking the live form state first, then I’ll replace any carried-over text with a listing-specific Garching message.This form is still in the weaker anonymous state, so I’m switching it into the real logged-in path first before sending.I’m checking the actual input values directly — sometimes this form looks anonymous at first glance even when your saved data is already present.Good enough — the form has your core identity data already present, so I’m filling the listing-specific message and trying the send path.Good — **168496704** is at the live captcha step now. I’m extracting the original captcha image and sending it here.I started with the new Garching listing **168496704** and got it to the live captcha step.

I sent the **original captcha image** here:
- `$5hEXtVpa53qlJl-U87sLVMqjlU4qiQDgkcMgcM5S7TI`

Please read that captcha and send me the text exactly. Then I’ll submit it.


Yes — I’m changing them.

For **168496704** I already adapted the message to:
- **Herr Bernd Guenther**
- **2-Zimmer-Maisonette**
- **Garching**
- **ab 1.7.2026 bzw. nach Absprache**

I’m entering `cgyyk` into that live captcha now and then I’ll verify the send in the real inbox.The form succeeded. I’m doing the real inbox verification now so we treat it as confirmed, not just banner-success.Good news: **168496704** is now actually sent and appears in the real inbox.

Verified:
- recipient: **Bernd Guenther**
- status: sent and present in **Nachrichten**
- timestamp: **19:44**

So yes, I changed the placeholders properly for this one:
- **Herr Bernd Guenther**
- **2-Zimmer-Maisonette**
- **Garching**
- **ab 1.7.2026 bzw. nach Absprache**

And one more useful update from the inbox:
- **Walter Dudium** has now also **rejected** you (“Objekt anderweitig vergeben”)

So Dudium is unfortunately dead now too.

Summary: High prompt-cache reuse.

Output:
Yes — I’m changing them.

For **168496704** I already adapted the message to:
- **Herr Bernd Guenther**
- **2-Zimmer-Maisonette**
- **Garching**
- **ab 1.7.2026 bzw. nach Absprache**

I’m entering `cgyyk` into that live captcha now and then I’ll verify the send in the real inbox.The form succeeded. I’m doing the real inbox verification now so we treat it as confirmed, not just banner-success.Good news: **168496704** is now actually sent and appears in the real inbox.

Verified:
- recipient: **Bernd Guenther**
- status: sent and present in **Nachrichten**
- timestamp: **19:44**

So yes, I changed the placeholders properly for this one:
- **Herr Bernd Guenther**
- **2-Zimmer-Maisonette**
- **Garching**
- **ab 1.7.2026 bzw. nach Absprache**

And one more useful update from the inbox:
- **Walter Dudium** has now also **rejected** you (“Objekt anderweitig vergeben”)

So Dudium is unfortunately dead now too.

cgyyk, you're changing the placeholders right?


I’m proceeding with the second Garching option now:
- **168495316** — 2,5-Zimmer-Dachgeschosswohnung

I’ll open the contact flow, adapt the text properly, and get it to the captcha/send step.This one has provider hidden, so I’m switching the greeting back to a neutral **Guten Tag** and adapting the listing details properly before submitting.**168495316** is now at the live captcha step too. I’m extracting the original captcha image and sending it here.I’ve now also set up the **second Garching option**:

- **168495316** — 2,5-Zimmer-Dachgeschosswohnung

It’s at the live captcha step, and I sent the **original captcha image** here:
- `$O3nQ7BsLnbwPFdRKp3PjqvufU-siuhtcLlJZ2SQ__1Y`

Please read that captcha and send me the text exactly. Then I’ll submit it too.

Summary: High prompt-cache reuse.

Output:
I’m proceeding with the second Garching option now:
- **168495316** — 2,5-Zimmer-Dachgeschosswohnung

I’ll open the contact flow, adapt the text properly, and get it to the captcha/send step.This one has provider hidden, so I’m switching the greeting back to a neutral **Guten Tag** and adapting the listing details properly before submitting.**168495316** is now at the live captcha step too. I’m extracting the original captcha image and sending it here.I’ve now also set up the **second Garching option**:

- **168495316** — 2,5-Zimmer-Dachgeschosswohnung

It’s at the live captcha step, and I sent the **original captcha image** here:
- `$O3nQ7BsLnbwPFdRKp3PjqvufU-siuhtcLlJZ2SQ__1Y`

Please read that captcha and send me the text exactly. Then I’ll submit it too.


Got it — I’m entering `ec8px` into the live captcha for **168495316** now, then I’ll verify the send in the real inbox.The form succeeded. I’m checking the real inbox so we can treat this second Garching listing as verified too.Good — **168495316** also went through.

Verified in the real inbox:
- it is now present in **Nachrichten**
- same provider grouping shows up as **Bernd Guenther · 85748 Garching ...**
- timestamp: **19:57**

So both of the new Garching options are now sent:
- **168496704** — Bernd Guenther
- **168495316** — provider hidden in form, but grouped to the same Garching conversation stream / sender label in inbox

And yes, I adapted the second one too:
- neutral **Guten Tag**
- **2,5-Zimmer-Dachgeschosswohnung**
- **Garching**
- **zum 1.8.2026 bzw. nach Absprache**

If you want, next I can move on to:
- **Eching 168252005**
or
- **Neufahrn 168398031**

Summary: High prompt-cache reuse.

Output:
Got it — I’m entering `ec8px` into the live captcha for **168495316** now, then I’ll verify the send in the real inbox.The form succeeded. I’m checking the real inbox so we can treat this second Garching listing as verified too.Good — **168495316** also went through.

Verified in the real inbox:
- it is now present in **Nachrichten**
- same provider grouping shows up as **Bernd Guenther · 85748 Garching ...**
- timestamp: **19:57**

So both of the new Garching options are now sent:
- **168496704** — Bernd Guenther
- **168495316** — provider hidden in form, but grouped to the same Garching conversation stream / sender label in inbox

And yes, I adapted the second one too:
- neutral **Guten Tag**
- **2,5-Zimmer-Dachgeschosswohnung**
- **Garching**
- **zum 1.8.2026 bzw. nach Absprache**

If you want, next I can move on to:
- **Eching 168252005**
or
- **Neufahrn 168398031**


Those are the **next two surrounding-area candidates** we had shortlisted after the core north-belt pass:

### **Eching — 168252005**
- **2 rooms**
- **63 m²**
- **1.090 €**
- private
- looked like a decent fallback

### **Neufahrn — 168398031**
- **2 rooms**
- **77.5 m²**
- **1.010 €**
- the strongest candidate outside the core four

So I meant:
- if we continue beyond Garching/Ismaning/Schleißheim leftovers,
- the next sensible places to try are **Eching** and **Neufahrn**.

If you want, I can now open both and re-check them before we send anything.

Summary: High prompt-cache reuse.

Output:
Those are the **next two surrounding-area candidates** we had shortlisted after the core north-belt pass:

### **Eching — 168252005**
- **2 rooms**
- **63 m²**
- **1.090 €**
- private
- looked like a decent fallback

### **Neufahrn — 168398031**
- **2 rooms**
- **77.5 m²**
- **1.010 €**
- the strongest candidate outside the core four

So I meant:
- if we continue beyond Garching/Ismaning/Schleißheim leftovers,
- the next sensible places to try are **Eching** and **Neufahrn**.

If you want, I can now open both and re-check them before we send anything.


I’m opening **Neufahrn 168398031** and **Eching 168252005** now and will re-check them before sending anything.Both are open. I’m extracting the details that matter so we can decide whether to send one or both.I checked both more closely.

## Neufahrn — 168398031
Still good, but **not as clean as it first looked**:
- **2 Zi**
- **77.5 m²**
- **1.010 € cold / 1.350 € warm**
- **EBK**
- **Balkon**
- **Bezugsfrei ab 01.08.2026**
- not furnished
- not Nachvermietung

### Downsides
- **The kitchen can be taken over from the previous tenant**
  so this is an **Ablöse / buyout risk**
- garage/stellplatz also listed
- competition already high:
  - views ~640
  - saved ~70
  - contacted ~76

So: still possible, but not as clean as I hoped.

---

## Eching — 168252005
This one is similar:
- **2 Zi**
- **63 m²**
- **1.090 € cold / 1.250 € warm**
- **EBK**
- **Balkon**
- **Bezugsfrei ab 1.7.2026**
- not furnished
- not Nachvermietung
- pets **nach Vereinbarung**

### Downsides
- also shows **Ablöse / takeover risk**
- Tiefgaragenstellplatz listed
- competition is even higher:
  - views ~1430
  - saved ~119
  - contacted ~106

So this is also **not clean-clean**.

---

## Bottom line
Both are still **sendable**, but both now moved down because of likely **kitchen/transfer buyout friction**.

### If I rank them now:
1. **168398031** — slightly better
2. **168252005** — still okay, but more crowded
3. neither is as clean as the better Garching private ones were

So if you want to keep pushing, I would still try them — just with lower expectations and extra caution about:
- **Ablöse**
- kitchen takeover
- any hidden costs tied to previous tenant items

If you want, I can proceed with **168398031** first.

Summary: High prompt-cache reuse.

Output:
I’m opening **Neufahrn 168398031** and **Eching 168252005** now and will re-check them before sending anything.Both are open. I’m extracting the details that matter so we can decide whether to send one or both.I checked both more closely.

## Neufahrn — 168398031
Still good, but **not as clean as it first looked**:
- **2 Zi**
- **77.5 m²**
- **1.010 € cold / 1.350 € warm**
- **EBK**
- **Balkon**
- **Bezugsfrei ab 01.08.2026**
- not furnished
- not Nachvermietung

### Downsides
- **The kitchen can be taken over from the previous tenant**
  so this is an **Ablöse / buyout risk**
- garage/stellplatz also listed
- competition already high:
  - views ~640
  - saved ~70
  - contacted ~76

So: still possible, but not as clean as I hoped.

---

## Eching — 168252005
This one is similar:
- **2 Zi**
- **63 m²**
- **1.090 € cold / 1.250 € warm**
- **EBK**
- **Balkon**
- **Bezugsfrei ab 1.7.2026**
- not furnished
- not Nachvermietung
- pets **nach Vereinbarung**

### Downsides
- also shows **Ablöse / takeover risk**
- Tiefgaragenstellplatz listed
- competition is even higher:
  - views ~1430
  - saved ~119
  - contacted ~106

So this is also **not clean-clean**.

---

## Bottom line
Both are still **sendable**, but both now moved down because of likely **kitchen/transfer buyout friction**.

### If I rank them now:
1. **168398031** — slightly better
2. **168252005** — still okay, but more crowded
3. neither is as clean as the better Garching private ones were

So if you want to keep pushing, I would still try them — just with lower expectations and extra caution about:
- **Ablöse**
- kitchen takeover
- any hidden costs tied to previous tenant items

If you want, I can proceed with **168398031** first.


Okay — I’ll proceed with the stronger of the two first:

- **Neufahrn 168398031**

I’ll open the contact flow, adapt the message properly, and see whether it’s worth sending despite the kitchen takeover risk.The Neufahrn form is open. I’m checking whether it’s in the logged-in state and who the provider is before I decide the exact wording.The Neufahrn form is for **Hepting IMMOBILIEN GmbH** and it still had the old Garching text in it, so I’m replacing it with a Neufahrn-specific version now.Even with the kitchen-takeover caveat, this Neufahrn one is still worth trying. I’m sending it now and then I’ll see whether we land in captcha or success.Neufahrn didn’t go to captcha — it hit a form validation error instead. I’m checking the actual invalid field directly rather than guessing.The form state after submit is weird enough that I don’t want to guess further blind. I’m going to pause sending Neufahrn for the moment and say clearly: it likely needs a more explicit logged-in/field-prefill fix before it’s worth another click. Eching is still available as the cleaner next immediate send path.Quick result:

- **Neufahrn 168398031** is **not ready to send cleanly yet**
- after clicking submit it did **not** go to captcha
- it also did **not** expose a simple invalid field
- so this one likely needs a more annoying form-state fix before it’s worth pushing further

Given that, my practical recommendation is:

### Next immediate sendable target
- **Eching 168252005**

### Neufahrn 168398031
Still possible, but currently:
- more friction
- kitchen takeover risk
- and the form flow is being annoying

So I’d say:
- **skip Neufahrn for the moment**
- **send Eching next**
- come back to Neufahrn later if needed

If you want, I can proceed with **Eching 168252005** now.

Summary: High prompt-cache reuse.

Output:
Okay — I’ll proceed with the stronger of the two first:

- **Neufahrn 168398031**

I’ll open the contact flow, adapt the message properly, and see whether it’s worth sending despite the kitchen takeover risk.The Neufahrn form is open. I’m checking whether it’s in the logged-in state and who the provider is before I decide the exact wording.The Neufahrn form is for **Hepting IMMOBILIEN GmbH** and it still had the old Garching text in it, so I’m replacing it with a Neufahrn-specific version now.Even with the kitchen-takeover caveat, this Neufahrn one is still worth trying. I’m sending it now and then I’ll see whether we land in captcha or success.Neufahrn didn’t go to captcha — it hit a form validation error instead. I’m checking the actual invalid field directly rather than guessing.The form state after submit is weird enough that I don’t want to guess further blind. I’m going to pause sending Neufahrn for the moment and say clearly: it likely needs a more explicit logged-in/field-prefill fix before it’s worth another click. Eching is still available as the cleaner next immediate send path.Quick result:

- **Neufahrn 168398031** is **not ready to send cleanly yet**
- after clicking submit it did **not** go to captcha
- it also did **not** expose a simple invalid field
- so this one likely needs a more annoying form-state fix before it’s worth pushing further

Given that, my practical recommendation is:

### Next immediate sendable target
- **Eching 168252005**

### Neufahrn 168398031
Still possible, but currently:
- more friction
- kitchen takeover risk
- and the form flow is being annoying

So I’d say:
- **skip Neufahrn for the moment**
- **send Eching next**
- come back to Neufahrn later if needed

If you want, I can proceed with **Eching 168252005** now.


No worries — that makes sense.

And good, now we can push again without rationing every turn.

Current state is still pretty decent:
- Dudium ended in rejection after the viewing
- we saved the reusable **Selbstauskunft + SCHUFA + contract + salary slips**
- both fresh Garching listings were sent
- Neufahrn got weird form-state issues
- **Eching 168252005** was the next cleaner candidate to try

So we can just resume from there.

If you want, I’d continue with:
1. **Eching 168252005**
2. then either retry **Neufahrn 168398031** more carefully or search for fresh new ones again.

Summary: Moderate prompt-cache reuse.

Output:
No worries — that makes sense.

And good, now we can push again without rationing every turn.

Current state is still pretty decent:
- Dudium ended in rejection after the viewing
- we saved the reusable **Selbstauskunft + SCHUFA + contract + salary slips**
- both fresh Garching listings were sent
- Neufahrn got weird form-state issues
- **Eching 168252005** was the next cleaner candidate to try

So we can just resume from there.

If you want, I’d continue with:
1. **Eching 168252005**
2. then either retry **Neufahrn 168398031** more carefully or search for fresh new ones again.

Sorry for disappearing, I blew my chatgpt/codex limits and wanted to conserve them. Now they are reset so we are good