* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (15):
- todowrite / pending / call_niMjcC04mIARw9MUEYtb6mZ
- todowrite / in_progress / call_niMjcC04mIARw9MUEYtb6mZ
- 3 todos / completed / call_niMjcC04mIARw9MUEYtb6mZ
- apply_patch / pending / call_rowogc6CqLLlkqgAjhSWQMH
- apply_patch / in_progress / call_rowogc6CqLLlkqgAjhSWQMH
- Success. Updated the following files:
M ../../state/persistent-chat/character.js / completed / call_rowogc6CqLLlkqgAjhSWQMH
- read / pending / call_meytifh4j01yXJ5cqqiHnIG
- read / in_progress / call_meytifh4j01yXJ5cqqiHnIG
- read / pending / call_Xsef3drczxiR57y7Dh1LbdV
- ../../state/persistent-chat/character.json / completed / call_meytifh4j01yXJ5cqqiHnIG
- read / in_progress / call_Xsef3drczxiR57y7Dh1LbdV
- ../../app/prompts/persistent-chat/bootstrap.md / completed / call_Xsef3drczxiR57y7Dh1LbdV
- todowrite / pending / call_yXtfqNhpHtQFPm0wwdrkmnn
- todowrite / in_progress / call_yXtfqNhpHtQFPm0wwdrkmnn
- 1 todos / completed / call_yXtfqNhpHtQFPm0wwdrkmnn

Draft:
Done


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 84.7s
Time: model 83.0s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.4ktok/9.5kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 374.9k; active 374.9k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 102


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 374.9k; active 374.9k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 102
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (15):
- todowrite / pending / call_niMjcC04mIARw9MUEYtb6mZ
- todowrite / in_progress / call_niMjcC04mIARw9MUEYtb6mZ
- 3 todos / completed / call_niMjcC04mIARw9MUEYtb6mZ
- apply_patch / pending / call_rowogc6CqLLlkqgAjhSWQMH
- apply_patch / in_progress / call_rowogc6CqLLlkqgAjhSWQMH
- Success. Updated the following files:
M ../../state/persistent-chat/character.js / completed / call_rowogc6CqLLlkqgAjhSWQMH
- read / pending / call_meytifh4j01yXJ5cqqiHnIG
- read / in_progress / call_meytifh4j01yXJ5cqqiHnIG
- read / pending / call_Xsef3drczxiR57y7Dh1LbdV
- ../../state/persistent-chat/character.json / completed / call_meytifh4j01yXJ5cqqiHnIG
- read / in_progress / call_Xsef3drczxiR57y7Dh1LbdV
- ../../app/prompts/persistent-chat/bootstrap.md / completed / call_Xsef3drczxiR57y7Dh1LbdV
- todowrite / pending / call_yXtfqNhpHtQFPm0wwdrkmnn
- todowrite / in_progress / call_yXtfqNhpHtQFPm0wwdrkmnn
- 1 todos / completed / call_yXtfqNhpHtQFPm0wwdrkmnn

Draft:
Done.

What was allowed/result:
- edit permission worked
- the prompt-layer change succeeded
- I verified both files afterward

What changed:

### `/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/character.json`
Added a durable diagnosis rule:
- distinguish **resolved


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 90.7s
Time: model 89.0s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.4ktok/9.5kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 374.9k; active 374.9k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 102


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (15):
- todowrite / pending / call_niMjcC04mIARw9MUEYtb6mZ
- todowrite / in_progress / call_niMjcC04mIARw9MUEYtb6mZ
- 3 todos / completed / call_niMjcC04mIARw9MUEYtb6mZ
- apply_patch / pending / call_rowogc6CqLLlkqgAjhSWQMH
- apply_patch / in_progress / call_rowogc6CqLLlkqgAjhSWQMH
- Success. Updated the following files:
M ../../state/persistent-chat/character.js / completed / call_rowogc6CqLLlkqgAjhSWQMH
- read / pending / call_meytifh4j01yXJ5cqqiHnIG
- read / in_progress / call_meytifh4j01yXJ5cqqiHnIG
- read / pending / call_Xsef3drczxiR57y7Dh1LbdV
- ../../state/persistent-chat/character.json / completed / call_meytifh4j01yXJ5cqqiHnIG
- read / in_progress / call_Xsef3drczxiR57y7Dh1LbdV
- ../../app/prompts/persistent-chat/bootstrap.md / completed / call_Xsef3drczxiR57y7Dh1LbdV
- todowrite / pending / call_yXtfqNhpHtQFPm0wwdrkmnn
- todowrite / in_progress / call_yXtfqNhpHtQFPm0wwdrkmnn
- 1 todos / completed / call_yXtfqNhpHtQFPm0wwdrkmnn

Draft:
Done.

What was allowed/result:
- edit permission worked
- the prompt-layer change succeeded
- I verified both files afterward

What changed:

### `/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/character.json`
Added a durable diagnosis rule:
- distinguish **resolved causes**, **active issues**, and **plausible but unconfirmed hypotheses**
- once a cause is sufficiently explained, stop foregrounding it unless new evidence reopens it

Also strengthened style/goals:
- focus attention on unresolved issues


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (15):
- todowrite / pending / call_niMjcC04mIARw9MUEYtb6mZ
- todowrite / in_progress / call_niMjcC04mIARw9MUEYtb6mZ
- 3 todos / completed / call_niMjcC04mIARw9MUEYtb6mZ
- apply_patch / pending / call_rowogc6CqLLlkqgAjhSWQMH
- apply_patch / in_progress / call_rowogc6CqLLlkqgAjhSWQMH
- Success. Updated the following files:
M ../../state/persistent-chat/character.js / completed / call_rowogc6CqLLlkqgAjhSWQMH
- read / pending / call_meytifh4j01yXJ5cqqiHnIG
- read / in_progress / call_meytifh4j01yXJ5cqqiHnIG
- read / pending / call_Xsef3drczxiR57y7Dh1LbdV
- ../../state/persistent-chat/character.json / completed / call_meytifh4j01yXJ5cqqiHnIG
- read / in_progress / call_Xsef3drczxiR57y7Dh1LbdV
- ../../app/prompts/persistent-chat/bootstrap.md / completed / call_Xsef3drczxiR57y7Dh1LbdV
- todowrite / pending / call_yXtfqNhpHtQFPm0wwdrkmnn
- todowrite / in_progress / call_yXtfqNhpHtQFPm0wwdrkmnn
- 1 todos / completed / call_yXtfqNhpHtQFPm0wwdrkmnn

Draft:
Done.

What was allowed/result:
- edit permission worked
- the prompt-layer change succeeded
- I verified both files afterward

What changed:

### `/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/character.json`
Added a durable diagnosis rule:
- distinguish **resolved causes**, **active issues**, and **plausible but unconfirmed hypotheses**
- once a cause is sufficiently explained, stop foregrounding it unless new evidence reopens it

Also strengthened style/goals:
- focus attention on unresolved issues
- keep diagnosis stateful
- explicitly retire explained causes and track what would reopen them

### `/home/matrix-lite/app/prompts/persistent-chat/bootstrap.md`
Added an operating rule:
- in diagnosis threads, distinguish resolved causes, active


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 96.7s
Time: model 95.0s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.4ktok/9.5kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 374.9k; active 374.9k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 102


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (15):
- todowrite / pending / call_niMjcC04mIARw9MUEYtb6mZ
- todowrite / in_progress / call_niMjcC04mIARw9MUEYtb6mZ
- 3 todos / completed / call_niMjcC04mIARw9MUEYtb6mZ
- apply_patch / pending / call_rowogc6CqLLlkqgAjhSWQMH
- apply_patch / in_progress / call_rowogc6CqLLlkqgAjhSWQMH
- Success. Updated the following files:
M ../../state/persistent-chat/character.js / completed / call_rowogc6CqLLlkqgAjhSWQMH
- read / pending / call_meytifh4j01yXJ5cqqiHnIG
- read / in_progress / call_meytifh4j01yXJ5cqqiHnIG
- read / pending / call_Xsef3drczxiR57y7Dh1LbdV
- ../../state/persistent-chat/character.json / completed / call_meytifh4j01yXJ5cqqiHnIG
- read / in_progress / call_Xsef3drczxiR57y7Dh1LbdV
- ../../app/prompts/persistent-chat/bootstrap.md / completed / call_Xsef3drczxiR57y7Dh1LbdV
- todowrite / pending / call_yXtfqNhpHtQFPm0wwdrkmnn
- todowrite / in_progress / call_yXtfqNhpHtQFPm0wwdrkmnn
- 1 todos / completed / call_yXtfqNhpHtQFPm0wwdrkmnn

Draft:
Done.

What was allowed/result:
- edit permission worked
- the prompt-layer change succeeded
- I verified both files afterward

What changed:

### `/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/character.json`
Added a durable diagnosis rule:
- distinguish **resolved causes**, **active issues**, and **plausible but unconfirmed hypotheses**
- once a cause is sufficiently explained, stop foregrounding it unless new evidence reopens it

Also strengthened style/goals:
- focus attention on unresolved issues
- keep diagnosis stateful
- explicitly retire explained causes and track what would reopen them

### `/home/matrix-lite/app/prompts/persistent-chat/bootstrap.md`
Added an operating rule:
- in diagnosis threads, distinguish resolved causes, active issues, and plausible but unconfirmed hypotheses
- once a cause is sufficiently explained, stop foregrounding it unless new evidence reopens it

So this is now in the actual prompt path, not just in chat.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (15):
- todowrite / pending / call_niMjcC04mIARw9MUEYtb6mZ
- todowrite / in_progress / call_niMjcC04mIARw9MUEYtb6mZ
- 3 todos / completed / call_niMjcC04mIARw9MUEYtb6mZ
- apply_patch / pending / call_rowogc6CqLLlkqgAjhSWQMH
- apply_patch / in_progress / call_rowogc6CqLLlkqgAjhSWQMH
- Success. Updated the following files:
M ../../state/persistent-chat/character.js / completed / call_rowogc6CqLLlkqgAjhSWQMH
- read / pending / call_meytifh4j01yXJ5cqqiHnIG
- read / in_progress / call_meytifh4j01yXJ5cqqiHnIG
- read / pending / call_Xsef3drczxiR57y7Dh1LbdV
- ../../state/persistent-chat/character.json / completed / call_meytifh4j01yXJ5cqqiHnIG
- read / in_progress / call_Xsef3drczxiR57y7Dh1LbdV
- ../../app/prompts/persistent-chat/bootstrap.md / completed / call_Xsef3drczxiR57y7Dh1LbdV
- todowrite / pending / call_yXtfqNhpHtQFPm0wwdrkmnn
- todowrite / in_progress / call_yXtfqNhpHtQFPm0wwdrkmnn
- 1 todos / completed / call_yXtfqNhpHtQFPm0wwdrkmnn

Draft:
Done.

What was allowed/result:
- edit permission worked
- the prompt-layer change succeeded
- I verified both files afterward

What changed:

### `/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/character.json`
Added a durable diagnosis rule:
- distinguish **resolved causes**, **active issues**, and **plausible but unconfirmed hypotheses**
- once a cause is sufficiently explained, stop foregrounding it unless new evidence reopens it

Also strengthened style/goals:
- focus attention on unresolved issues
- keep diagnosis stateful
- explicitly retire explained causes and track what would reopen them

### `/home/matrix-lite/app/prompts/persistent-chat/bootstrap.md`
Added an operating rule:
- in diagnosis threads, distinguish resolved causes, active issues, and plausible but unconfirmed hypotheses
- once a cause is sufficiently explained, stop foregrounding it unless new evidence reopens it

So this is now in the actual prompt path, not just in chat.
Next, if you want, I can go back to the pages/DiffyViewer integration.


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 101.9s
Time: model 100.1s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 666 o 215 cache 378.9k/100% est $0.0049; p≈2.4ktok/9.5kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 374.9k; active 374.9k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 102


Done.

What was allowed/result:
- edit permission worked
- the prompt-layer change succeeded
- I verified both files afterward

What changed:

### `/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/character.json`
Added a durable diagnosis rule:
- distinguish **resolved causes**, **active issues**, and **plausible but unconfirmed hypotheses**
- once a cause is sufficiently explained, stop foregrounding it unless new evidence reopens it

Also strengthened style/goals:
- focus attention on unresolved issues
- keep diagnosis stateful
- explicitly retire explained causes and track what would reopen them

### `/home/matrix-lite/app/prompts/persistent-chat/bootstrap.md`
Added an operating rule:
- in diagnosis threads, distinguish resolved causes, active issues, and plausible but unconfirmed hypotheses
- once a cause is sufficiently explained, stop foregrounding it unless new evidence reopens it

So this is now in the actual prompt path, not just in chat.
Next, if you want, I can go back to the pages/DiffyViewer integration.


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 102.5s
Time: model 100.1s, overhead 2.4s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 666 o 215 cache 378.9k/100% est $0.0049; p≈2.4ktok/9.5kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 102


This is amazing thank you. Let's do the diff viewer too


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 102


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 102


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.9s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 102


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.3s
Time: overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 102


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP load session start (1.4s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 102
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP replay drain done (4.8s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 103
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 6.9s
Time: model 5.0s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 103


📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Waiting for first model/tool update…


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP prompt started (4.8s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 103
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 12.8s
Time: model 10.9s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 103


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 18.2s
Time: model 16.4s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 103


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first session update (13.2s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 103
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first tool update (14.5s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 103
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 103
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (1):
- todowrite / pending / call_OGPpWoIVUzxk5Yhrn2ckFEg


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 23.7s
Time: model 21.8s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 103


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 29.0s
Time: model 27.1s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 103


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 34.5s
Time: model 32.6s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 103


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (4):
- todowrite / pending / call_OGPpWoIVUzxk5Yhrn2ckFEg
- todowrite / in_progress / call_OGPpWoIVUzxk5Yhrn2ckFEg
- 3 todos / completed / call_OGPpWoIVUzxk5Yhrn2ckFEg
- apply_patch / pending / call_j7rhsmHbFcGF4p0WQTEKtha


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 40.1s
Time: model 38.2s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 103


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 45.5s
Time: model 43.7s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 103


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 51.1s
Time: model 49.3s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 103


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 56.7s
Time: model 54.8s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 103


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 62.2s
Time: model 60.4s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 103


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 67.7s
Time: model 65.9s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 103


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 73.3s
Time: model 71.4s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 103


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 78.8s
Time: model 76.9s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 103


* 🟠 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 83.0s
Time: model 81.1s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: est $0.0000; p≈2.6ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 103


* 🔴 Failed
Stage: model/tool run failed
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 83.4s
Time: model 81.1s
Cause: direct ACP pending tool start timeout after 45s/45000ms: apply_patch / pending / call_j7rhsmHbFcGF4p0WQTEKtha
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 103


* 🔴 Failed
Stage: no final answer
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 83.9s
Time: model 81.1s
Cause: direct ACP pending tool start timeout after 45s/45000ms: apply_patch / pending / call_j7rhsmHbFcGF4p0WQTEKtha
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 103


⚠ Matrix-lite did not receive a final answer for this request. The direct ACP model/tool run failed or was interrupted before it produced a final response. If this was blocked by permissions, I can request same-room native ACP approval or use the privileged broker for root-required commands; please retry the request.


* 🔴 Failed
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 84.4s
Time: model 81.1s, overhead 3.2s
Cause: direct ACP pending tool start timeout after 45s/45000ms: apply_patch / pending / call_j7rhsmHbFcGF4p0WQTEKtha
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: est $0.0000; p≈2.6ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP p≈2.6ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 103


hmm, what happened now?


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 103


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 103


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.6s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 103


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.1s
Time: overhead 1.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.3ktok/9.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 103


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP load session start (1.4s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 103
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP replay drain done (4.7s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 104
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 6.9s
Time: model 5.1s, overhead 1.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.3ktok/9.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 104


📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Waiting for first model/tool update…


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP prompt started (4.7s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 104
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 12.5s
Time: model 10.8s, overhead 1.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.3ktok/9.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 104


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 18.1s
Time: model 16.3s, overhead 1.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.3ktok/9.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 104


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first session update (12.1s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 104
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first visible text (13.2s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 104
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 104
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
This


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 23.6s
Time: model 21.8s, overhead 1.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.3ktok/9.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 104


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
This time it’s different again: `apply_patch` never really got going.

The failure reason says:
- **pending tool start timeout after 45s**
- tool: `apply_patch`

So unlike the earlier long approval wait:
- it didn’t reach a


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
This time it’s different again: `apply_patch` never really got going.

The failure reason says:
- **pending tool start timeout after 45s**
- tool: `apply_patch`

So unlike the earlier long approval wait:
- it didn’t reach a human approval wait
- it didn’t finish and then fail
- it got stuck at **tool startup/init**

So the current failure was:
- **tool start path stalled for `apply_patch`**
- then the 45s start timeout killed the turn


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 29.8s
Time: model 28.1s, overhead 1.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.3ktok/9.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 104


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
This time it’s different again: `apply_patch` never really got going.

The failure reason says:
- **pending tool start timeout after 45s**
- tool: `apply_patch`

So unlike the earlier long approval wait:
- it didn’t reach a human approval wait
- it didn’t finish and then fail
- it got stuck at **tool startup/init**

So the current failure was:
- **tool start path stalled for `apply_patch`**
- then the 45s start timeout killed the turn

That’s narrower than “everything is broken,” but still annoying.


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 30.6s
Time: model 28.9s, overhead 1.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 384.3k o 125 t 39 est $0.9633; p≈2.3ktok/9.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 379.8k; active 881; cache 378.9k/100%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 104


This time it’s different again: `apply_patch` never really got going.

The failure reason says:
- **pending tool start timeout after 45s**
- tool: `apply_patch`

So unlike the earlier long approval wait:
- it didn’t reach a human approval wait
- it didn’t finish and then fail
- it got stuck at **tool startup/init**

So the current failure was:
- **tool start path stalled for `apply_patch`**
- then the 45s start timeout killed the turn

That’s narrower than “everything is broken,” but still annoying.


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 31.4s
Time: model 28.9s, overhead 2.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 384.3k o 125 t 39 est $0.9633; p≈2.3ktok/9.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 384.5k; active 384.5k; p≈2.3ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 104


what is the reason though?


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 384.5k; active 384.5k; p≈2.3ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 104


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 384.5k; active 384.5k; p≈2.3ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 104


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.6s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 384.5k; active 384.5k; p≈2.3ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 104


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.0s
Time: overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.7ktok/10.8kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 384.5k; active 384.5k; p≈2.3ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 104


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP load session start (1.4s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 384.5k; active 384.5k; p≈2.3ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 104
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP replay drain done (4.7s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 384.5k; active 384.5k; p≈2.3ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 105
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 6.8s
Time: model 5.1s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.7ktok/10.8kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 384.5k; active 384.5k; p≈2.3ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 105


📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Waiting for first model/tool update…


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP prompt started (4.7s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 384.5k; active 384.5k; p≈2.3ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 105
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 12.4s
Time: model 10.7s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.7ktok/10.8kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 384.5k; active 384.5k; p≈2.3ktok; ctx 35.7%; usable 40.7%; observed turns 73; actual turns 105


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 17.7s
Time: model 16.0s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.7ktok/10.8kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 384.5k; active 384.5k; p≈2.3ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 105


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first session update (15.8s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 384.5k; active 384.5k; p≈2.3ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 105
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first visible text (15.8s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 384.5k; active 384.5k; p≈2.3ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 105
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 23.1s
Time: model 21.3s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.7ktok/10.8kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 384.5k; active 384.5k; p≈2.3ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 105


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 384.5k; active 384.5k; p≈2.3ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 105
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
The


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
The exact recorded reason is:

- **`apply_patch` stayed in `pending`**
- and the daemon killed it after **45s**
- with: **`pending tool start timeout after 45s`**

So more concretely:
-


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 28.9s
Time: model 27.1s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.7ktok/10.8kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 384.5k; active 384.5k; p≈2.3ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 105


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
The exact recorded reason is:

- **`apply_patch` stayed in `pending`**
- and the daemon killed it after **45s**
- with: **`pending tool start timeout after 45s`**

So more concretely:
- the model decided to call `apply_patch`
- but the tool never transitioned from **pending** to **running**
- meaning it likely got stuck **before actual execution**, not during the patch itself

So the


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 35.1s
Time: model 33.4s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.7ktok/10.8kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 384.5k; active 384.5k; p≈2.3ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 105


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
The exact recorded reason is:

- **`apply_patch` stayed in `pending`**
- and the daemon killed it after **45s**
- with: **`pending tool start timeout after 45s`**

So more concretely:
- the model decided to call `apply_patch`
- but the tool never transitioned from **pending** to **running**
- meaning it likely got stuck **before actual execution**, not during the patch itself

So the reason is **not**:
- bad patch content
- slow approval
- model confusion

It’s more like:
- **tool-start handshake/init stalled**
- and the watchdog fired

What I **don’t** know yet is


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
The exact recorded reason is:

- **`apply_patch` stayed in `pending`**
- and the daemon killed it after **45s**
- with: **`pending tool start timeout after 45s`**

So more concretely:
- the model decided to call `apply_patch`
- but the tool never transitioned from **pending** to **running**
- meaning it likely got stuck **before actual execution**, not during the patch itself

So the reason is **not**:
- bad patch content
- slow approval
- model confusion

It’s more like:
- **tool-start handshake/init stalled**
- and the watchdog fired

What I **don’t** know yet is why that handshake stalled:
- tool bridge hiccup
- apply_patch startup issue
- permission preflight interaction
- direct ACP wrapper bug

So:
- **recorded reason:** pending tool start timeout
- **deeper cause:** still underdetermined


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 41.1s
Time: model 39.4s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.7ktok/10.8kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 384.5k; active 384.5k; p≈2.3ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 105


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
The exact recorded reason is:

- **`apply_patch` stayed in `pending`**
- and the daemon killed it after **45s**
- with: **`pending tool start timeout after 45s`**

So more concretely:
- the model decided to call `apply_patch`
- but the tool never transitioned from **pending** to **running**
- meaning it likely got stuck **before actual execution**, not during the patch itself

So the reason is **not**:
- bad patch content
- slow approval
- model confusion

It’s more like:
- **tool-start handshake/init stalled**
- and the watchdog fired

What I **don’t** know yet is why that handshake stalled:
- tool bridge hiccup
- apply_patch startup issue
- permission preflight interaction
- direct ACP wrapper bug

So:
- **recorded reason:** pending tool start timeout
- **deeper cause:** still underdetermined between wrapper/tool-start path components


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 41.9s
Time: model 40.2s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 386.8k o 203 t 102 est $0.9717; p≈2.7ktok/10.8kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 384.5k; active 384.5k; p≈2.3ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 105


The exact recorded reason is:

- **`apply_patch` stayed in `pending`**
- and the daemon killed it after **45s**
- with: **`pending tool start timeout after 45s`**

So more concretely:
- the model decided to call `apply_patch`
- but the tool never transitioned from **pending** to **running**
- meaning it likely got stuck **before actual execution**, not during the patch itself

So the reason is **not**:
- bad patch content
- slow approval
- model confusion

It’s more like:
- **tool-start handshake/init stalled**
- and the watchdog fired

What I **don’t** know yet is why that handshake stalled:
- tool bridge hiccup
- apply_patch startup issue
- permission preflight interaction
- direct ACP wrapper bug

So:
- **recorded reason:** pending tool start timeout
- **deeper cause:** still underdetermined between wrapper/tool-start path components


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 42.4s
Time: model 40.2s, overhead 2.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 386.8k o 203 t 102 est $0.9717; p≈2.7ktok/10.8kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 387.1k; active 387.1k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 105


can you determine this?


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 387.1k; active 387.1k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 105


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 387.1k; active 387.1k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 105


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 387.1k; active 387.1k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 105


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.0s
Time: overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 387.1k; active 387.1k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 105


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP load session start (1.4s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 387.1k; active 387.1k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 105
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 6.5s
Time: model 5.0s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 387.1k; active 387.1k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 106


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP replay drain done (5.0s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 387.1k; active 387.1k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 106
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Waiting for first model/tool update…


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP prompt started (5.0s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 387.1k; active 387.1k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 106
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 12.6s
Time: model 11.0s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 387.1k; active 387.1k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 106


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first session update (9.7s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 387.1k; active 387.1k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 106
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first tool update (10.5s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 387.1k; active 387.1k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 106
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 387.1k; active 387.1k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 106
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (1):
- todowrite / pending / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 23.9s
Time: model 22.4s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 387.1k; active 387.1k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 106


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 29.4s
Time: model 27.9s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 387.1k; active 387.1k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 106


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (4):
- todowrite / pending / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- todowrite / in_progress / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- 3 todos / completed / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- matrix_lite_status_list_session_log_files / pending / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 34.9s
Time: model 33.4s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 387.1k; active 387.1k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 106


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (10):
- todowrite / pending / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- todowrite / in_progress / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- 3 todos / completed / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- matrix_lite_status_list_session_log_files / pending / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_list_session_log_files / in_progress / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_search_session_logs / pending / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- tool / completed / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_search_session_logs / in_progress / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- matrix_lite_status_runtime_debug_report / pending / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- matrix_lite_status_runtime_debug_report / in_progress / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (11):
- todowrite / pending / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- todowrite / in_progress / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- 3 todos / completed / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- matrix_lite_status_list_session_log_files / pending / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_list_session_log_files / in_progress / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_search_session_logs / pending / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- tool / completed / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_search_session_logs / in_progress / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- matrix_lite_status_runtime_debug_report / pending / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- matrix_lite_status_runtime_debug_report / in_progress / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- tool / completed / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 40.8s
Time: model 39.3s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 387.1k; active 387.1k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 106


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 46.1s
Time: model 44.6s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 387.1k; active 387.1k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 106


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 51.8s
Time: model 50.3s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 387.1k; active 387.1k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 106


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (13):
- todowrite / pending / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- todowrite / in_progress / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- 3 todos / completed / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- matrix_lite_status_list_session_log_files / pending / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_list_session_log_files / in_progress / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_search_session_logs / pending / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- tool / completed / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_search_session_logs / in_progress / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- matrix_lite_status_runtime_debug_report / pending / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- matrix_lite_status_runtime_debug_report / in_progress / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- tool / completed / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- tool / completed / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / pending / call_2dQEcViodG2XIM1iEWra9Cf


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (19):
- todowrite / pending / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- todowrite / in_progress / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- 3 todos / completed / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- matrix_lite_status_list_session_log_files / pending / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_list_session_log_files / in_progress / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_search_session_logs / pending / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- tool / completed / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_search_session_logs / in_progress / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- matrix_lite_status_runtime_debug_report / pending / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- matrix_lite_status_runtime_debug_report / in_progress / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- tool / completed / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- tool / completed / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / pending / call_2dQEcViodG2XIM1iEWra9Cf
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / in_progress / call_2dQEcViodG2XIM1iEWra9Cf
- tool / completed / call_2dQEcViodG2XIM1iEWra9Cf
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / pending / call_ZKLB1qM7WnNt9XuoKzXoTX8
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / in_progress / call_ZKLB1qM7WnNt9XuoKzXoTX8
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / pending / call_TAxzYoNFv7WN3222QYJk6Rm
- tool / completed / call_ZKLB1qM7WnNt9XuoKzXoTX8


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 57.3s
Time: model 55.8s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 387.1k; active 387.1k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 106


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 62.7s
Time: model 61.1s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 387.1k; active 387.1k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 106


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 68.2s
Time: model 66.7s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 387.1k; active 387.1k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 106


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 73.8s
Time: model 72.3s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 387.1k; active 387.1k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 106


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first visible text (67.5s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 387.1k; active 387.1k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 106
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 387.1k; active 387.1k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 106
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (21):
- todowrite / pending / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- todowrite / in_progress / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- 3 todos / completed / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- matrix_lite_status_list_session_log_files / pending / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_list_session_log_files / in_progress / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_search_session_logs / pending / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- tool / completed / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_search_session_logs / in_progress / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- matrix_lite_status_runtime_debug_report / pending / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- matrix_lite_status_runtime_debug_report / in_progress / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- tool / completed / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- tool / completed / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / pending / call_2dQEcViodG2XIM1iEWra9Cf
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / in_progress / call_2dQEcViodG2XIM1iEWra9Cf
- tool / completed / call_2dQEcViodG2XIM1iEWra9Cf
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / pending / call_ZKLB1qM7WnNt9XuoKzXoTX8
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / in_progress / call_ZKLB1qM7WnNt9XuoKzXoTX8
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / pending / call_TAxzYoNFv7WN3222QYJk6Rm
- tool / completed / call_ZKLB1qM7WnNt9XuoKzXoTX8
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / in_progress / call_TAxzYoNFv7WN3222QYJk6Rm
- tool / completed / call_TAxzYoNFv7WN3222QYJk6Rm

Draft:
Yes


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (21):
- todowrite / pending / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- todowrite / in_progress / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- 3 todos / completed / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- matrix_lite_status_list_session_log_files / pending / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_list_session_log_files / in_progress / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_search_session_logs / pending / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- tool / completed / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_search_session_logs / in_progress / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- matrix_lite_status_runtime_debug_report / pending / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- matrix_lite_status_runtime_debug_report / in_progress / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- tool / completed / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- tool / completed / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / pending / call_2dQEcViodG2XIM1iEWra9Cf
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / in_progress / call_2dQEcViodG2XIM1iEWra9Cf
- tool / completed / call_2dQEcViodG2XIM1iEWra9Cf
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / pending / call_ZKLB1qM7WnNt9XuoKzXoTX8
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / in_progress / call_ZKLB1qM7WnNt9XuoKzXoTX8
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / pending / call_TAxzYoNFv7WN3222QYJk6Rm
- tool / completed / call_ZKLB1qM7WnNt9XuoKzXoTX8
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / in_progress / call_TAxzYoNFv7WN3222QYJk6Rm
- tool / completed / call_TAxzYoNFv7WN3222QYJk6Rm

Draft:
Yes — at least to a useful level.

My best current determination is:

### What happened
For the **15:54 DiffyViewer/pages** failure, `apply_patch` timed out **before it even entered `running`**.

That means:
- the model


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 79.7s
Time: model 78.2s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 387.1k; active 387.1k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 106


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (21):
- todowrite / pending / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- todowrite / in_progress / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- 3 todos / completed / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- matrix_lite_status_list_session_log_files / pending / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_list_session_log_files / in_progress / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_search_session_logs / pending / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- tool / completed / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_search_session_logs / in_progress / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- matrix_lite_status_runtime_debug_report / pending / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- matrix_lite_status_runtime_debug_report / in_progress / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- tool / completed / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- tool / completed / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / pending / call_2dQEcViodG2XIM1iEWra9Cf
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / in_progress / call_2dQEcViodG2XIM1iEWra9Cf
- tool / completed / call_2dQEcViodG2XIM1iEWra9Cf
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / pending / call_ZKLB1qM7WnNt9XuoKzXoTX8
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / in_progress / call_ZKLB1qM7WnNt9XuoKzXoTX8
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / pending / call_TAxzYoNFv7WN3222QYJk6Rm
- tool / completed / call_ZKLB1qM7WnNt9XuoKzXoTX8
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / in_progress / call_TAxzYoNFv7WN3222QYJk6Rm
- tool / completed / call_TAxzYoNFv7WN3222QYJk6Rm

Draft:
Yes — at least to a useful level.

My best current determination is:

### What happened
For the **15:54 DiffyViewer/pages** failure, `apply_patch` timed out **before it even entered `running`**.

That means:
- the model chose `apply_patch`
- but the tool never reached the normal execution stage
- and the watchdog killed it after **45s pending-start timeout**

### What that rules out
This was **


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 86.1s
Time: model 84.6s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 387.1k; active 387.1k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 106


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (21):
- todowrite / pending / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- todowrite / in_progress / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- 3 todos / completed / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- matrix_lite_status_list_session_log_files / pending / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_list_session_log_files / in_progress / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_search_session_logs / pending / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- tool / completed / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_search_session_logs / in_progress / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- matrix_lite_status_runtime_debug_report / pending / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- matrix_lite_status_runtime_debug_report / in_progress / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- tool / completed / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- tool / completed / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / pending / call_2dQEcViodG2XIM1iEWra9Cf
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / in_progress / call_2dQEcViodG2XIM1iEWra9Cf
- tool / completed / call_2dQEcViodG2XIM1iEWra9Cf
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / pending / call_ZKLB1qM7WnNt9XuoKzXoTX8
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / in_progress / call_ZKLB1qM7WnNt9XuoKzXoTX8
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / pending / call_TAxzYoNFv7WN3222QYJk6Rm
- tool / completed / call_ZKLB1qM7WnNt9XuoKzXoTX8
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / in_progress / call_TAxzYoNFv7WN3222QYJk6Rm
- tool / completed / call_TAxzYoNFv7WN3222QYJk6Rm

Draft:
Yes — at least to a useful level.

My best current determination is:

### What happened
For the **15:54 DiffyViewer/pages** failure, `apply_patch` timed out **before it even entered `running`**.

That means:
- the model chose `apply_patch`
- but the tool never reached the normal execution stage
- and the watchdog killed it after **45s pending-start timeout**

### What that rules out
This was **not**:
- a human approval delay
- a bad patch being rejected mid-run
- a permission denial killing the turn

Why I say that:
- in the earlier approval-timeout case, the logs clearly showed a permission


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (21):
- todowrite / pending / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- todowrite / in_progress / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- 3 todos / completed / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- matrix_lite_status_list_session_log_files / pending / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_list_session_log_files / in_progress / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_search_session_logs / pending / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- tool / completed / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_search_session_logs / in_progress / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- matrix_lite_status_runtime_debug_report / pending / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- matrix_lite_status_runtime_debug_report / in_progress / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- tool / completed / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- tool / completed / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / pending / call_2dQEcViodG2XIM1iEWra9Cf
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / in_progress / call_2dQEcViodG2XIM1iEWra9Cf
- tool / completed / call_2dQEcViodG2XIM1iEWra9Cf
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / pending / call_ZKLB1qM7WnNt9XuoKzXoTX8
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / in_progress / call_ZKLB1qM7WnNt9XuoKzXoTX8
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / pending / call_TAxzYoNFv7WN3222QYJk6Rm
- tool / completed / call_ZKLB1qM7WnNt9XuoKzXoTX8
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / in_progress / call_TAxzYoNFv7WN3222QYJk6Rm
- tool / completed / call_TAxzYoNFv7WN3222QYJk6Rm

Draft:
Yes — at least to a useful level.

My best current determination is:

### What happened
For the **15:54 DiffyViewer/pages** failure, `apply_patch` timed out **before it even entered `running`**.

That means:
- the model chose `apply_patch`
- but the tool never reached the normal execution stage
- and the watchdog killed it after **45s pending-start timeout**

### What that rules out
This was **not**:
- a human approval delay
- a bad patch being rejected mid-run
- a permission denial killing the turn

Why I say that:
- in the earlier approval-timeout case, the logs clearly showed a permission request being asked
- here, the failure was specifically **pending tool start timeout**
- and I do **not** see the analogous permission-ask / running-tool pattern before the failure

### Most likely cause
The failure is probably in the **tool-start path


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 92.4s
Time: model 90.9s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 387.1k; active 387.1k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 106


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (21):
- todowrite / pending / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- todowrite / in_progress / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- 3 todos / completed / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- matrix_lite_status_list_session_log_files / pending / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_list_session_log_files / in_progress / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_search_session_logs / pending / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- tool / completed / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_search_session_logs / in_progress / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- matrix_lite_status_runtime_debug_report / pending / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- matrix_lite_status_runtime_debug_report / in_progress / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- tool / completed / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- tool / completed / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / pending / call_2dQEcViodG2XIM1iEWra9Cf
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / in_progress / call_2dQEcViodG2XIM1iEWra9Cf
- tool / completed / call_2dQEcViodG2XIM1iEWra9Cf
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / pending / call_ZKLB1qM7WnNt9XuoKzXoTX8
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / in_progress / call_ZKLB1qM7WnNt9XuoKzXoTX8
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / pending / call_TAxzYoNFv7WN3222QYJk6Rm
- tool / completed / call_ZKLB1qM7WnNt9XuoKzXoTX8
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / in_progress / call_TAxzYoNFv7WN3222QYJk6Rm
- tool / completed / call_TAxzYoNFv7WN3222QYJk6Rm

Draft:
Yes — at least to a useful level.

My best current determination is:

### What happened
For the **15:54 DiffyViewer/pages** failure, `apply_patch` timed out **before it even entered `running`**.

That means:
- the model chose `apply_patch`
- but the tool never reached the normal execution stage
- and the watchdog killed it after **45s pending-start timeout**

### What that rules out
This was **not**:
- a human approval delay
- a bad patch being rejected mid-run
- a permission denial killing the turn

Why I say that:
- in the earlier approval-timeout case, the logs clearly showed a permission request being asked
- here, the failure was specifically **pending tool start timeout**
- and I do **not** see the analogous permission-ask / running-tool pattern before the failure

### Most likely cause
The failure is probably in the **tool-start path for `apply_patch` itself**, before normal permission/execution flow.

Most plausible explanations, in order:

1. **`apply_patch` startup/handshake stalled**
   - the bridge/tool runtime never fully launched the


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 98.5s
Time: model 97.0s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 387.1k; active 387.1k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 106


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (21):
- todowrite / pending / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- todowrite / in_progress / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- 3 todos / completed / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- matrix_lite_status_list_session_log_files / pending / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_list_session_log_files / in_progress / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_search_session_logs / pending / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- tool / completed / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_search_session_logs / in_progress / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- matrix_lite_status_runtime_debug_report / pending / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- matrix_lite_status_runtime_debug_report / in_progress / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- tool / completed / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- tool / completed / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / pending / call_2dQEcViodG2XIM1iEWra9Cf
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / in_progress / call_2dQEcViodG2XIM1iEWra9Cf
- tool / completed / call_2dQEcViodG2XIM1iEWra9Cf
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / pending / call_ZKLB1qM7WnNt9XuoKzXoTX8
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / in_progress / call_ZKLB1qM7WnNt9XuoKzXoTX8
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / pending / call_TAxzYoNFv7WN3222QYJk6Rm
- tool / completed / call_ZKLB1qM7WnNt9XuoKzXoTX8
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / in_progress / call_TAxzYoNFv7WN3222QYJk6Rm
- tool / completed / call_TAxzYoNFv7WN3222QYJk6Rm

Draft:
Yes — at least to a useful level.

My best current determination is:

### What happened
For the **15:54 DiffyViewer/pages** failure, `apply_patch` timed out **before it even entered `running`**.

That means:
- the model chose `apply_patch`
- but the tool never reached the normal execution stage
- and the watchdog killed it after **45s pending-start timeout**

### What that rules out
This was **not**:
- a human approval delay
- a bad patch being rejected mid-run
- a permission denial killing the turn

Why I say that:
- in the earlier approval-timeout case, the logs clearly showed a permission request being asked
- here, the failure was specifically **pending tool start timeout**
- and I do **not** see the analogous permission-ask / running-tool pattern before the failure

### Most likely cause
The failure is probably in the **tool-start path for `apply_patch` itself**, before normal permission/execution flow.

Most plausible explanations, in order:

1. **`apply_patch` startup/handshake stalled**
   - the bridge/tool runtime never fully launched the tool call

2. **Large patch payload made tool-start fragile**
   - this attempt involved a fairly large multi-file patch with long HTML content
   - that’s exactly the kind of call that can stress a brittle tool-start


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (21):
- todowrite / pending / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- todowrite / in_progress / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- 3 todos / completed / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- matrix_lite_status_list_session_log_files / pending / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_list_session_log_files / in_progress / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_search_session_logs / pending / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- tool / completed / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_search_session_logs / in_progress / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- matrix_lite_status_runtime_debug_report / pending / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- matrix_lite_status_runtime_debug_report / in_progress / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- tool / completed / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- tool / completed / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / pending / call_2dQEcViodG2XIM1iEWra9Cf
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / in_progress / call_2dQEcViodG2XIM1iEWra9Cf
- tool / completed / call_2dQEcViodG2XIM1iEWra9Cf
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / pending / call_ZKLB1qM7WnNt9XuoKzXoTX8
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / in_progress / call_ZKLB1qM7WnNt9XuoKzXoTX8
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / pending / call_TAxzYoNFv7WN3222QYJk6Rm
- tool / completed / call_ZKLB1qM7WnNt9XuoKzXoTX8
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / in_progress / call_TAxzYoNFv7WN3222QYJk6Rm
- tool / completed / call_TAxzYoNFv7WN3222QYJk6Rm

Draft:
Yes — at least to a useful level.

My best current determination is:

### What happened
For the **15:54 DiffyViewer/pages** failure, `apply_patch` timed out **before it even entered `running`**.

That means:
- the model chose `apply_patch`
- but the tool never reached the normal execution stage
- and the watchdog killed it after **45s pending-start timeout**

### What that rules out
This was **not**:
- a human approval delay
- a bad patch being rejected mid-run
- a permission denial killing the turn

Why I say that:
- in the earlier approval-timeout case, the logs clearly showed a permission request being asked
- here, the failure was specifically **pending tool start timeout**
- and I do **not** see the analogous permission-ask / running-tool pattern before the failure

### Most likely cause
The failure is probably in the **tool-start path for `apply_patch` itself**, before normal permission/execution flow.

Most plausible explanations, in order:

1. **`apply_patch` startup/handshake stalled**
   - the bridge/tool runtime never fully launched the tool call

2. **Large patch payload made tool-start fragile**
   - this attempt involved a fairly large multi-file patch with long HTML content
   - that’s exactly the kind of call that can stress a brittle tool-start path

3. **Direct ACP wrapper bug around tool initialization**
   - especially if `apply_patch` is treated differently from smaller tools like `todowrite`/`read`

### What I’m less convinced of
I’m **not


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 104.6s
Time: model 103.1s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 387.1k; active 387.1k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 106


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (21):
- todowrite / pending / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- todowrite / in_progress / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- 3 todos / completed / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- matrix_lite_status_list_session_log_files / pending / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_list_session_log_files / in_progress / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_search_session_logs / pending / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- tool / completed / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_search_session_logs / in_progress / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- matrix_lite_status_runtime_debug_report / pending / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- matrix_lite_status_runtime_debug_report / in_progress / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- tool / completed / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- tool / completed / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / pending / call_2dQEcViodG2XIM1iEWra9Cf
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / in_progress / call_2dQEcViodG2XIM1iEWra9Cf
- tool / completed / call_2dQEcViodG2XIM1iEWra9Cf
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / pending / call_ZKLB1qM7WnNt9XuoKzXoTX8
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / in_progress / call_ZKLB1qM7WnNt9XuoKzXoTX8
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / pending / call_TAxzYoNFv7WN3222QYJk6Rm
- tool / completed / call_ZKLB1qM7WnNt9XuoKzXoTX8
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / in_progress / call_TAxzYoNFv7WN3222QYJk6Rm
- tool / completed / call_TAxzYoNFv7WN3222QYJk6Rm

Draft:
Yes — at least to a useful level.

My best current determination is:

### What happened
For the **15:54 DiffyViewer/pages** failure, `apply_patch` timed out **before it even entered `running`**.

That means:
- the model chose `apply_patch`
- but the tool never reached the normal execution stage
- and the watchdog killed it after **45s pending-start timeout**

### What that rules out
This was **not**:
- a human approval delay
- a bad patch being rejected mid-run
- a permission denial killing the turn

Why I say that:
- in the earlier approval-timeout case, the logs clearly showed a permission request being asked
- here, the failure was specifically **pending tool start timeout**
- and I do **not** see the analogous permission-ask / running-tool pattern before the failure

### Most likely cause
The failure is probably in the **tool-start path for `apply_patch` itself**, before normal permission/execution flow.

Most plausible explanations, in order:

1. **`apply_patch` startup/handshake stalled**
   - the bridge/tool runtime never fully launched the tool call

2. **Large patch payload made tool-start fragile**
   - this attempt involved a fairly large multi-file patch with long HTML content
   - that’s exactly the kind of call that can stress a brittle tool-start path

3. **Direct ACP wrapper bug around tool initialization**
   - especially if `apply_patch` is treated differently from smaller tools like `todowrite`/`read`

### What I’m less convinced of
I’m **not** yet convinced this was:
- permission preflight specifically
- filesystem/path validation specifically
- model instability

### So the practical diagnosis is
**The tool-start phase for large `apply


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 111.0s
Time: model 109.5s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 387.1k; active 387.1k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 106


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (21):
- todowrite / pending / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- todowrite / in_progress / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- 3 todos / completed / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- matrix_lite_status_list_session_log_files / pending / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_list_session_log_files / in_progress / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_search_session_logs / pending / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- tool / completed / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_search_session_logs / in_progress / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- matrix_lite_status_runtime_debug_report / pending / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- matrix_lite_status_runtime_debug_report / in_progress / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- tool / completed / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- tool / completed / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / pending / call_2dQEcViodG2XIM1iEWra9Cf
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / in_progress / call_2dQEcViodG2XIM1iEWra9Cf
- tool / completed / call_2dQEcViodG2XIM1iEWra9Cf
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / pending / call_ZKLB1qM7WnNt9XuoKzXoTX8
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / in_progress / call_ZKLB1qM7WnNt9XuoKzXoTX8
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / pending / call_TAxzYoNFv7WN3222QYJk6Rm
- tool / completed / call_ZKLB1qM7WnNt9XuoKzXoTX8
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / in_progress / call_TAxzYoNFv7WN3222QYJk6Rm
- tool / completed / call_TAxzYoNFv7WN3222QYJk6Rm

Draft:
Yes — at least to a useful level.

My best current determination is:

### What happened
For the **15:54 DiffyViewer/pages** failure, `apply_patch` timed out **before it even entered `running`**.

That means:
- the model chose `apply_patch`
- but the tool never reached the normal execution stage
- and the watchdog killed it after **45s pending-start timeout**

### What that rules out
This was **not**:
- a human approval delay
- a bad patch being rejected mid-run
- a permission denial killing the turn

Why I say that:
- in the earlier approval-timeout case, the logs clearly showed a permission request being asked
- here, the failure was specifically **pending tool start timeout**
- and I do **not** see the analogous permission-ask / running-tool pattern before the failure

### Most likely cause
The failure is probably in the **tool-start path for `apply_patch` itself**, before normal permission/execution flow.

Most plausible explanations, in order:

1. **`apply_patch` startup/handshake stalled**
   - the bridge/tool runtime never fully launched the tool call

2. **Large patch payload made tool-start fragile**
   - this attempt involved a fairly large multi-file patch with long HTML content
   - that’s exactly the kind of call that can stress a brittle tool-start path

3. **Direct ACP wrapper bug around tool initialization**
   - especially if `apply_patch` is treated differently from smaller tools like `todowrite`/`read`

### What I’m less convinced of
I’m **not** yet convinced this was:
- permission preflight specifically
- filesystem/path validation specifically
- model instability

### So the practical diagnosis is
**The tool-start phase for large `apply_patch` calls is fragile.**
Not “tools in general,” and not “approval flow” in this particular case.

### What I’d do differently
If we retry before fixing code, I


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 387.1k; active 387.1k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 106
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (21):
- todowrite / pending / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- todowrite / in_progress / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- 3 todos / completed / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- matrix_lite_status_list_session_log_files / pending / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_list_session_log_files / in_progress / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_search_session_logs / pending / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- tool / completed / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_search_session_logs / in_progress / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- matrix_lite_status_runtime_debug_report / pending / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- matrix_lite_status_runtime_debug_report / in_progress / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- tool / completed / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- tool / completed / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / pending / call_2dQEcViodG2XIM1iEWra9Cf
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / in_progress / call_2dQEcViodG2XIM1iEWra9Cf
- tool / completed / call_2dQEcViodG2XIM1iEWra9Cf
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / pending / call_ZKLB1qM7WnNt9XuoKzXoTX8
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / in_progress / call_ZKLB1qM7WnNt9XuoKzXoTX8
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / pending / call_TAxzYoNFv7WN3222QYJk6Rm
- tool / completed / call_ZKLB1qM7WnNt9XuoKzXoTX8
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / in_progress / call_TAxzYoNFv7WN3222QYJk6Rm
- tool / completed / call_TAxzYoNFv7WN3222QYJk6Rm

Draft:
Yes — at least to a useful level.

My best current determination is:

### What happened
For the **15:54 DiffyViewer/pages** failure, `apply_patch` timed out **before it even entered `running`**.

That means:
- the model chose `apply_patch`
- but the tool never reached the normal execution stage
- and the watchdog killed it after **45s pending-start timeout**

### What that rules out
This was **not**:
- a human approval delay
- a bad patch being rejected mid-run
- a permission denial killing the turn

Why I say that:
- in the earlier approval-timeout case, the logs clearly showed a permission request being asked
- here, the failure was specifically **pending tool start timeout**
- and I do **not** see the analogous permission-ask / running-tool pattern before the failure

### Most likely cause
The failure is probably in the **tool-start path for `apply_patch` itself**, before normal permission/execution flow.

Most plausible explanations, in order:

1. **`apply_patch` startup/handshake stalled**
   - the bridge/tool runtime never fully launched the tool call

2. **Large patch payload made tool-start fragile**
   - this attempt involved a fairly large multi-file patch with long HTML content
   - that’s exactly the kind of call that can stress a brittle tool-start path

3. **Direct ACP wrapper bug around tool initialization**
   - especially if `apply_patch` is treated differently from smaller tools like `todowrite`/`read`

### What I’m less convinced of
I’m **not** yet convinced this was:
- permission preflight specifically
- filesystem/path validation specifically
- model instability

### So the practical diagnosis is
**The tool-start phase for large `apply_patch` calls is fragile.**
Not “tools in general,” and not “approval flow” in this particular case.

### What I’d do differently
If we retry before fixing code, I’d reduce stress on that path:
- smaller patch
- one file at a time
- avoid giant embedded HTML in one `apply_patch`
- maybe create the patch artifact first, then the HTML page second

So yes: I can’t give you a single


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 117.1s
Time: model 115.6s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 387.1k; active 387.1k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 106


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (21):
- todowrite / pending / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- todowrite / in_progress / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- 3 todos / completed / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- matrix_lite_status_list_session_log_files / pending / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_list_session_log_files / in_progress / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_search_session_logs / pending / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- tool / completed / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_search_session_logs / in_progress / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- matrix_lite_status_runtime_debug_report / pending / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- matrix_lite_status_runtime_debug_report / in_progress / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- tool / completed / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- tool / completed / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / pending / call_2dQEcViodG2XIM1iEWra9Cf
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / in_progress / call_2dQEcViodG2XIM1iEWra9Cf
- tool / completed / call_2dQEcViodG2XIM1iEWra9Cf
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / pending / call_ZKLB1qM7WnNt9XuoKzXoTX8
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / in_progress / call_ZKLB1qM7WnNt9XuoKzXoTX8
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / pending / call_TAxzYoNFv7WN3222QYJk6Rm
- tool / completed / call_ZKLB1qM7WnNt9XuoKzXoTX8
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / in_progress / call_TAxzYoNFv7WN3222QYJk6Rm
- tool / completed / call_TAxzYoNFv7WN3222QYJk6Rm

Draft:
Yes — at least to a useful level.

My best current determination is:

### What happened
For the **15:54 DiffyViewer/pages** failure, `apply_patch` timed out **before it even entered `running`**.

That means:
- the model chose `apply_patch`
- but the tool never reached the normal execution stage
- and the watchdog killed it after **45s pending-start timeout**

### What that rules out
This was **not**:
- a human approval delay
- a bad patch being rejected mid-run
- a permission denial killing the turn

Why I say that:
- in the earlier approval-timeout case, the logs clearly showed a permission request being asked
- here, the failure was specifically **pending tool start timeout**
- and I do **not** see the analogous permission-ask / running-tool pattern before the failure

### Most likely cause
The failure is probably in the **tool-start path for `apply_patch` itself**, before normal permission/execution flow.

Most plausible explanations, in order:

1. **`apply_patch` startup/handshake stalled**
   - the bridge/tool runtime never fully launched the tool call

2. **Large patch payload made tool-start fragile**
   - this attempt involved a fairly large multi-file patch with long HTML content
   - that’s exactly the kind of call that can stress a brittle tool-start path

3. **Direct ACP wrapper bug around tool initialization**
   - especially if `apply_patch` is treated differently from smaller tools like `todowrite`/`read`

### What I’m less convinced of
I’m **not** yet convinced this was:
- permission preflight specifically
- filesystem/path validation specifically
- model instability

### So the practical diagnosis is
**The tool-start phase for large `apply_patch` calls is fragile.**
Not “tools in general,” and not “approval flow” in this particular case.

### What I’d do differently
If we retry before fixing code, I’d reduce stress on that path:
- smaller patch
- one file at a time
- avoid giant embedded HTML in one `apply_patch`
- maybe create the patch artifact first, then the HTML page second

So yes: I can’t give you a single line like “bug X in function Y,” but I can narrow it to:

> **`apply_patch` pending-start failure, likely triggered in the tool initialization path, probably made worse by a large multi-file


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (21):
- todowrite / pending / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- todowrite / in_progress / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- 3 todos / completed / call_hzWn3F9FZ3RKdG8KeryzdrO
- matrix_lite_status_list_session_log_files / pending / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_list_session_log_files / in_progress / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_search_session_logs / pending / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- tool / completed / call_ILxHWotTodoPo4emZ8BeaZB
- matrix_lite_status_search_session_logs / in_progress / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- matrix_lite_status_runtime_debug_report / pending / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- matrix_lite_status_runtime_debug_report / in_progress / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- tool / completed / call_CMnHVsrBCt4aZw4SAy3cj4A
- tool / completed / call_HmueGlMzc0QLOeCtqBxVe0w
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / pending / call_2dQEcViodG2XIM1iEWra9Cf
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / in_progress / call_2dQEcViodG2XIM1iEWra9Cf
- tool / completed / call_2dQEcViodG2XIM1iEWra9Cf
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / pending / call_ZKLB1qM7WnNt9XuoKzXoTX8
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / in_progress / call_ZKLB1qM7WnNt9XuoKzXoTX8
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / pending / call_TAxzYoNFv7WN3222QYJk6Rm
- tool / completed / call_ZKLB1qM7WnNt9XuoKzXoTX8
- matrix_lite_status_load_session_log_file / in_progress / call_TAxzYoNFv7WN3222QYJk6Rm
- tool / completed / call_TAxzYoNFv7WN3222QYJk6Rm

Draft:
Yes — at least to a useful level.

My best current determination is:

### What happened
For the **15:54 DiffyViewer/pages** failure, `apply_patch` timed out **before it even entered `running`**.

That means:
- the model chose `apply_patch`
- but the tool never reached the normal execution stage
- and the watchdog killed it after **45s pending-start timeout**

### What that rules out
This was **not**:
- a human approval delay
- a bad patch being rejected mid-run
- a permission denial killing the turn

Why I say that:
- in the earlier approval-timeout case, the logs clearly showed a permission request being asked
- here, the failure was specifically **pending tool start timeout**
- and I do **not** see the analogous permission-ask / running-tool pattern before the failure

### Most likely cause
The failure is probably in the **tool-start path for `apply_patch` itself**, before normal permission/execution flow.

Most plausible explanations, in order:

1. **`apply_patch` startup/handshake stalled**
   - the bridge/tool runtime never fully launched the tool call

2. **Large patch payload made tool-start fragile**
   - this attempt involved a fairly large multi-file patch with long HTML content
   - that’s exactly the kind of call that can stress a brittle tool-start path

3. **Direct ACP wrapper bug around tool initialization**
   - especially if `apply_patch` is treated differently from smaller tools like `todowrite`/`read`

### What I’m less convinced of
I’m **not** yet convinced this was:
- permission preflight specifically
- filesystem/path validation specifically
- model instability

### So the practical diagnosis is
**The tool-start phase for large `apply_patch` calls is fragile.**
Not “tools in general,” and not “approval flow” in this particular case.

### What I’d do differently
If we retry before fixing code, I’d reduce stress on that path:
- smaller patch
- one file at a time
- avoid giant embedded HTML in one `apply_patch`
- maybe create the patch artifact first, then the HTML page second

So yes: I can’t give you a single line like “bug X in function Y,” but I can narrow it to:

> **`apply_patch` pending-start failure, likely triggered in the tool initialization path, probably made worse by a large multi-file patch payload.**


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 121.7s
Time: model 120.2s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 29.0k o 514 t 197 cache 393.2k/93% est $0.0831; p≈2.5ktok/10.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 387.1k; active 387.1k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 106


Yes — at least to a useful level.

My best current determination is:

### What happened
For the **15:54 DiffyViewer/pages** failure, `apply_patch` timed out **before it even entered `running`**.

That means:
- the model chose `apply_patch`
- but the tool never reached the normal execution stage
- and the watchdog killed it after **45s pending-start timeout**

### What that rules out
This was **not**:
- a human approval delay
- a bad patch being rejected mid-run
- a permission denial killing the turn

Why I say that:
- in the earlier approval-timeout case, the logs clearly showed a permission request being asked
- here, the failure was specifically **pending tool start timeout**
- and I do **not** see the analogous permission-ask / running-tool pattern before the failure

### Most likely cause
The failure is probably in the **tool-start path for `apply_patch` itself**, before normal permission/execution flow.

Most plausible explanations, in order:

1. **`apply_patch` startup/handshake stalled**
   - the bridge/tool runtime never fully launched the tool call

2. **Large patch payload made tool-start fragile**
   - this attempt involved a fairly large multi-file patch with long HTML content
   - that’s exactly the kind of call that can stress a brittle tool-start path

3. **Direct ACP wrapper bug around tool initialization**
   - especially if `apply_patch` is treated differently from smaller tools like `todowrite`/`read`

### What I’m less convinced of
I’m **not** yet convinced this was:
- permission preflight specifically
- filesystem/path validation specifically
- model instability

### So the practical diagnosis is
**The tool-start phase for large `apply_patch` calls is fragile.**
Not “tools in general,” and not “approval flow” in this particular case.

### What I’d do differently
If we retry before fixing code, I’d reduce stress on that path:
- smaller patch
- one file at a time
- avoid giant embedded HTML in one `apply_patch`
- maybe create the patch artifact first, then the HTML page second

So yes: I can’t give you a single line like “bug X in function Y,” but I can narrow it to:

> **`apply_patch` pending-start failure, likely triggered in the tool initialization path, probably made worse by a large multi-file patch payload.**


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 122.3s
Time: model 120.2s, overhead 2.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 29.0k o 514 t 197 cache 393.2k/93% est $0.0831; p≈2.5ktok/10.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 422.9k; active 29.7k; cache 393.2k/93%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 106


multi-file patches is exactly the bug that was fixed, please check the repo


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 422.9k; active 29.7k; cache 393.2k/93%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 106


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 422.9k; active 29.7k; cache 393.2k/93%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 106


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.6s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 422.9k; active 29.7k; cache 393.2k/93%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 106


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.3s
Time: overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.2ktok/12.7kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 422.9k; active 29.7k; cache 393.2k/93%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 106


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP load session start (1.6s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 422.9k; active 29.7k; cache 393.2k/93%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 106
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 7.0s
Time: model 5.0s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.2ktok/12.7kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 422.9k; active 29.7k; cache 393.2k/93%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 106


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP replay drain done (5.5s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 422.9k; active 29.7k; cache 393.2k/93%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 107
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Waiting for first model/tool update…


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP prompt started (5.5s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 422.9k; active 29.7k; cache 393.2k/93%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 107
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 12.6s
Time: model 10.6s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.2ktok/12.7kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 422.9k; active 29.7k; cache 393.2k/93%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 107


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 18.0s
Time: model 16.0s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.2ktok/12.7kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 422.9k; active 29.7k; cache 393.2k/93%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 107


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 23.6s
Time: model 21.6s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.2ktok/12.7kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 422.9k; active 29.7k; cache 393.2k/93%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 107


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first session update (21.1s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 422.9k; active 29.7k; cache 393.2k/93%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 107
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 29.1s
Time: model 27.1s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.2ktok/12.7kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 422.9k; active 29.7k; cache 393.2k/93%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 107


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first tool update (21.1s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 422.9k; active 29.7k; cache 393.2k/93%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 107
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 422.9k; active 29.7k; cache 393.2k/93%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 107
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (1):
- bash / pending / call_bvg3RVJq8phv5KJ9IJOA7uC


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (7):
- bash / pending / call_bvg3RVJq8phv5KJ9IJOA7uC
- bash / in_progress / call_bvg3RVJq8phv5KJ9IJOA7uC
- bash / pending / call_IxijPjFZDZve8VR6lGGEu2s
- bash / in_progress / call_bvg3RVJq8phv5KJ9IJOA7uC
- Shows recent repo commits / completed / call_bvg3RVJq8phv5KJ9IJOA7uC
- bash / in_progress / call_IxijPjFZDZve8VR6lGGEu2s
- grep / pending / call_X0hdp3A4Ycu7sPRkqkSdeCf


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 34.9s
Time: model 32.9s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.2ktok/12.7kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 422.9k; active 29.7k; cache 393.2k/93%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 107


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first visible text (30.0s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 422.9k; active 29.7k; cache 393.2k/93%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 107
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (11):
- bash / pending / call_bvg3RVJq8phv5KJ9IJOA7uC
- bash / in_progress / call_bvg3RVJq8phv5KJ9IJOA7uC
- bash / pending / call_IxijPjFZDZve8VR6lGGEu2s
- bash / in_progress / call_bvg3RVJq8phv5KJ9IJOA7uC
- Shows recent repo commits / completed / call_bvg3RVJq8phv5KJ9IJOA7uC
- bash / in_progress / call_IxijPjFZDZve8VR6lGGEu2s
- grep / pending / call_X0hdp3A4Ycu7sPRkqkSdeCf
- bash / in_progress / call_IxijPjFZDZve8VR6lGGEu2s
- Shows current repo diff summary / completed / call_IxijPjFZDZve8VR6lGGEu2s
- grep / in_progress / call_X0hdp3A4Ycu7sPRkqkSdeCf
- apply_patch|multi-file patches|pending tool start timeout|tool start timeout|45s / completed / call_X0hdp3A4Ycu7sPRkqkSdeCf

Draft:
You


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 40.5s
Time: model 38.5s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.2ktok/12.7kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 422.9k; active 29.7k; cache 393.2k/93%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 107


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (11):
- bash / pending / call_bvg3RVJq8phv5KJ9IJOA7uC
- bash / in_progress / call_bvg3RVJq8phv5KJ9IJOA7uC
- bash / pending / call_IxijPjFZDZve8VR6lGGEu2s
- bash / in_progress / call_bvg3RVJq8phv5KJ9IJOA7uC
- Shows recent repo commits / completed / call_bvg3RVJq8phv5KJ9IJOA7uC
- bash / in_progress / call_IxijPjFZDZve8VR6lGGEu2s
- grep / pending / call_X0hdp3A4Ycu7sPRkqkSdeCf
- bash / in_progress / call_IxijPjFZDZve8VR6lGGEu2s
- Shows current repo diff summary / completed / call_IxijPjFZDZve8VR6lGGEu2s
- grep / in_progress / call_X0hdp3A4Ycu7sPRkqkSdeCf
- apply_patch|multi-file patches|pending tool start timeout|tool start timeout|45s / completed / call_X0hdp3A4Ycu7sPRkqkSdeCf

Draft:
You’re right — and I should have checked the repo before leaning on that hypothesis.

Current repo state says:
- latest commit: **`d1dd9ba` — `fix: preserve partial direct ACP replies`**
-


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 46.1s
Time: model 44.1s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.2ktok/12.7kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 422.9k; active 29.7k; cache 393.2k/93%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 36.6%; usable 41.7%; observed turns 76; actual turns 107