* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (9):
- websearch / pending / call_SmJ7OQlKawvfbIplUNEnz1I
- websearch / in_progress / call_SmJ7OQlKawvfbIplUNEnz1I
- websearch / pending / call_FBmxLdcnnqLyvRuzNiDrJ5h
- websearch / in_progress / call_FBmxLdcnnqLyvRuzNiDrJ5h
- websearch / pending / call_vjjPkKgy4ZY4weplch66Vtt
- websearch / in_progress / call_vjjPkKgy4ZY4weplch66Vtt
- Web search: Review Board Gerrit self hosted code review diff interface open sour / completed / call_vjjPkKgy4ZY4weplch66Vtt
- Web search: Forgejo pull request diff view self-hosted open source 2026 / completed / call_FBmxLdcnnqLyvRuzNiDrJ5h
- Web search: self-hosted open source diff review web interface git patch viewer 2 / completed / call_SmJ7OQlKawvfbIplUNEnz1I

Draft:
t to your use case
   - low ceremony
   - easy to run locally/on your box
   - good for “show me the actual dirty diff in a browser right now”

### What I’d avoid unless you want process too
- **Gerrit**
- maybe even **Review Board**

Those solve more than you asked for, but they bring workflow weight.

### My rough ranking for you
- **Most practical now:** `git-webdiff`
- **Most polished local-first review UX:** `Diffity`
- **Most minimal/simple:** `git-diff`
- **Most full-featured classic review server:** `Review Board`

### Likely best choice
If the goal is:
- view large diffs comfortably
- maybe host here
- not force PR workflow
- work well with iterative agent edits

then **git-webdiff** looks especially strong.

If the goal is:
- nicer human review UX
- comments/resolution flow
- more “review workbench” feel

then **Diffity** is probably the more interesting one.

If you want, next


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 250.0k; active 671; cache 249.3k/100%; p≈2.9ktok; ctx 23.8%; usable 27.1%; observed turns 44; actual turns 73
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 87.5s
Time: model 85.4s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.4ktok/13.7kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 250.0k; active 671; cache 249.3k/100%; p≈2.9ktok; ctx 23.8%; usable 27.1%; observed turns 44; actual turns 73


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (9):
- websearch / pending / call_SmJ7OQlKawvfbIplUNEnz1I
- websearch / in_progress / call_SmJ7OQlKawvfbIplUNEnz1I
- websearch / pending / call_FBmxLdcnnqLyvRuzNiDrJ5h
- websearch / in_progress / call_FBmxLdcnnqLyvRuzNiDrJ5h
- websearch / pending / call_vjjPkKgy4ZY4weplch66Vtt
- websearch / in_progress / call_vjjPkKgy4ZY4weplch66Vtt
- Web search: Review Board Gerrit self hosted code review diff interface open sour / completed / call_vjjPkKgy4ZY4weplch66Vtt
- Web search: Forgejo pull request diff view self-hosted open source 2026 / completed / call_FBmxLdcnnqLyvRuzNiDrJ5h
- Web search: self-hosted open source diff review web interface git patch viewer 2 / completed / call_SmJ7OQlKawvfbIplUNEnz1I

Draft:
aybe even **Review Board**

Those solve more than you asked for, but they bring workflow weight.

### My rough ranking for you
- **Most practical now:** `git-webdiff`
- **Most polished local-first review UX:** `Diffity`
- **Most minimal/simple:** `git-diff`
- **Most full-featured classic review server:** `Review Board`

### Likely best choice
If the goal is:
- view large diffs comfortably
- maybe host here
- not force PR workflow
- work well with iterative agent edits

then **git-webdiff** looks especially strong.

If the goal is:
- nicer human review UX
- comments/resolution flow
- more “review workbench” feel

then **Diffity** is probably the more interesting one.

If you want, next I can do a more opinionated comparison:
- **installation complexity**
- **resource footprint**
- **works on dirty working tree**
- **best for agent-generated diffs**
- **best choice for your current setup**


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 88.8s
Time: model 86.7s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 14.3k o 589 t 113 cache 252.4k/95% est $0.0462; p≈3.4ktok/13.7kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 250.0k; active 671; cache 249.3k/100%; p≈2.9ktok; ctx 23.8%; usable 27.1%; observed turns 44; actual turns 73


Yes — there are a few good self-hostable/open-source options, and they split into two categories:

**Best fit for your exact problem: local/self-hosted diff viewers**
- **Diffity** — GitHub-style browser diff/review UI, local-first, built for agent workflows. Good if you want a polished diff viewer with comments and agent-friendly review flow.
- **git-webdiff** — persistent local web diff server, multi-file view, hot reload, watch mode. Very practical for reviewing changing diffs during iteration.
- **git-diff** — lightweight local browser UI, GitHub-style, zero/low setup, all local. Good if you want something simple and fast.
- **DiffDeck** — lighter “open this git diff in browser” tool. Useful, but more minimal.

**Heavier full code-review platforms**
- **Review Board** — mature, very capable diff viewer, self-hosted, proper review workflow. Good if you want a real review system, not just a viewer.
- **Gerrit** — powerful but heavier and more workflow-opinionated. Great if you want strict code review infrastructure; probably overkill for “show me diffs nicely.”
- **Forgejo/Gitea** — if your diffs can live as branches/PRs, this gives you a familiar web review UI. Best when you’re okay routing things through a git host workflow.

My guidance, not just a list:

### What I’d try first
1. **git-webdiff** or **Diffity**
   - closest to your use case
   - low ceremony
   - easy to run locally/on your box
   - good for “show me the actual dirty diff in a browser right now”

### What I’d avoid unless you want process too
- **Gerrit**
- maybe even **Review Board**

Those solve more than you asked for, but they bring workflow weight.

### My rough ranking for you
- **Most practical now:** `git-webdiff`
- **Most polished local-first review UX:** `Diffity`
- **Most minimal/simple:** `git-diff`
- **Most full-featured classic review server:** `Review Board`

### Likely best choice
If the goal is:
- view large diffs comfortably
- maybe host here
- not force PR workflow
- work well with iterative agent edits

then **git-webdiff** looks especially strong.

If the goal is:
- nicer human review UX
- comments/resolution flow
- more “review workbench” feel

then **Diffity** is probably the more interesting one.

If you want, next I can do a more opinionated comparison:
- **installation complexity**
- **resource footprint**
- **works on dirty working tree**
- **best for agent-generated diffs**
- **best choice for your current setup**


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 89.6s
Time: model 86.7s, overhead 2.9s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 14.3k o 589 t 113 cache 252.4k/95% est $0.0462; p≈3.4ktok/13.7kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 267.4k; active 15.0k; cache 252.4k/95%; p≈3.4ktok; ctx 23.8%; usable 27.1%; observed turns 44; actual turns 73


It's more like you just proposed some changes here and I approved, but I didn't actually see the lines because of clunky interface. Which of these tools works best so we can just embed a link in your permission request I can view quickly and approve?


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 267.4k; active 15.0k; cache 252.4k/95%; p≈3.4ktok; ctx 25.5%; usable 29.0%; observed turns 45; actual turns 73


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 267.4k; active 15.0k; cache 252.4k/95%; p≈3.4ktok; ctx 25.5%; usable 29.0%; observed turns 45; actual turns 73


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.6s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 267.4k; active 15.0k; cache 252.4k/95%; p≈3.4ktok; ctx 25.5%; usable 29.0%; observed turns 45; actual turns 73


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.2s
Time: overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.1ktok/12.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 267.4k; active 15.0k; cache 252.4k/95%; p≈3.4ktok; ctx 25.5%; usable 29.0%; observed turns 45; actual turns 73


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP load session start (1.4s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 267.4k; active 15.0k; cache 252.4k/95%; p≈3.4ktok; ctx 25.5%; usable 29.0%; observed turns 45; actual turns 73
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP replay drain done (4.7s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 267.4k; active 15.0k; cache 252.4k/95%; p≈3.4ktok; ctx 25.5%; usable 29.0%; observed turns 45; actual turns 74
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 6.9s
Time: model 5.1s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.1ktok/12.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 267.4k; active 15.0k; cache 252.4k/95%; p≈3.4ktok; ctx 25.5%; usable 29.0%; observed turns 45; actual turns 74


📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Waiting for first model/tool update…


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP prompt started (4.7s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 267.4k; active 15.0k; cache 252.4k/95%; p≈3.4ktok; ctx 25.5%; usable 29.0%; observed turns 45; actual turns 74
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 13.0s
Time: model 11.2s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.1ktok/12.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 267.4k; active 15.0k; cache 252.4k/95%; p≈3.4ktok; ctx 25.5%; usable 29.0%; observed turns 45; actual turns 74


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first session update (7.0s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 267.4k; active 15.0k; cache 252.4k/95%; p≈3.4ktok; ctx 25.5%; usable 29.0%; observed turns 45; actual turns 74
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first visible text (8.5s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 267.4k; active 15.0k; cache 252.4k/95%; p≈3.4ktok; ctx 25.5%; usable 29.0%; observed turns 45; actual turns 74
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 267.4k; active 15.0k; cache 252.4k/95%; p≈3.4ktok; ctx 25.5%; usable 29.0%; observed turns 45; actual turns 74
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
For


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 18.6s
Time: model 16.7s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.1ktok/12.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 267.4k; active 15.0k; cache 252.4k/95%; p≈3.4ktok; ctx 25.5%; usable 29.0%; observed turns 45; actual turns 74


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
For that exact workflow, **git-webdiff** looks like the best fit.

Why I’d pick it over the others:
- it’s **local/self-hosted**
- made to show a **whole git diff in one browser view


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
For that exact workflow, **git-webdiff** looks like the best fit.

Why I’d pick it over the others:
- it’s **local/self-hosted**
- made to show a **whole git diff in one browser view**
- supports **hot reload**
- good for **dirty working tree / iterative changes**
- simpler to wire into a permission flow than a full review platform
- less heavy than Review Board/Gerrit
- more practical than a PR-based Forgejo flow


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 25.1s
Time: model 23.3s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.1ktok/12.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 267.4k; active 15.0k; cache 252.4k/95%; p≈3.4ktok; ctx 25.5%; usable 29.0%; observed turns 45; actual turns 74


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
For that exact workflow, **git-webdiff** looks like the best fit.

Why I’d pick it over the others:
- it’s **local/self-hosted**
- made to show a **whole git diff in one browser view**
- supports **hot reload**
- good for **dirty working tree / iterative changes**
- simpler to wire into a permission flow than a full review platform
- less heavy than Review Board/Gerrit
- more practical than a PR-based Forgejo flow for quick “see this patch, approve it” moments

What I’d actually want in the permission request flow:
- I prepare a patch/diff
- system starts or reuses a local `git-webdiff`


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 31.4s
Time: model 29.5s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.1ktok/12.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 267.4k; active 15.0k; cache 252.4k/95%; p≈3.4ktok; ctx 25.5%; usable 29.0%; observed turns 45; actual turns 74


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
For that exact workflow, **git-webdiff** looks like the best fit.

Why I’d pick it over the others:
- it’s **local/self-hosted**
- made to show a **whole git diff in one browser view**
- supports **hot reload**
- good for **dirty working tree / iterative changes**
- simpler to wire into a permission flow than a full review platform
- less heavy than Review Board/Gerrit
- more practical than a PR-based Forgejo flow for quick “see this patch, approve it” moments

What I’d actually want in the permission request flow:
- I prepare a patch/diff
- system starts or reuses a local `git-webdiff` session
- permission panel includes a **link**
- you open it, review the diff in browser, then approve/reject in Matrix

That seems much closer to your real need than “install a whole code review product.”

### Runner


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
ed**
- made to show a **whole git diff in one browser view**
- supports **hot reload**
- good for **dirty working tree / iterative changes**
- simpler to wire into a permission flow than a full review platform
- less heavy than Review Board/Gerrit
- more practical than a PR-based Forgejo flow for quick “see this patch, approve it” moments

What I’d actually want in the permission request flow:
- I prepare a patch/diff
- system starts or reuses a local `git-webdiff` session
- permission panel includes a **link**
- you open it, review the diff in browser, then approve/reject in Matrix

That seems much closer to your real need than “install a whole code review product.”

### Runner-up
**Diffity** if you want a more polished review workbench with comments and agent-oriented workflow.

Why not my first pick:
- a bit more opinionated / larger
- may be better if you want a full recurring review


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 37.5s
Time: model 35.7s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.1ktok/12.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 267.4k; active 15.0k; cache 252.4k/95%; p≈3.4ktok; ctx 25.5%; usable 29.0%; observed turns 45; actual turns 74


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
on flow than a full review platform
- less heavy than Review Board/Gerrit
- more practical than a PR-based Forgejo flow for quick “see this patch, approve it” moments

What I’d actually want in the permission request flow:
- I prepare a patch/diff
- system starts or reuses a local `git-webdiff` session
- permission panel includes a **link**
- you open it, review the diff in browser, then approve/reject in Matrix

That seems much closer to your real need than “install a whole code review product.”

### Runner-up
**Diffity** if you want a more polished review workbench with comments and agent-oriented workflow.

Why not my first pick:
- a bit more opinionated / larger
- may be better if you want a full recurring review UI, not just “show me the proposed diff right now”

### Not my first choice here
- **Review Board / Gerrit** — too heavy for this approval-link use case
- **Forgejo/Gitea PR


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 43.7s
Time: model 41.8s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.1ktok/12.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 267.4k; active 15.0k; cache 252.4k/95%; p≈3.4ktok; ctx 25.5%; usable 29.0%; observed turns 45; actual turns 74


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
ission request flow:
- I prepare a patch/diff
- system starts or reuses a local `git-webdiff` session
- permission panel includes a **link**
- you open it, review the diff in browser, then approve/reject in Matrix

That seems much closer to your real need than “install a whole code review product.”

### Runner-up
**Diffity** if you want a more polished review workbench with comments and agent-oriented workflow.

Why not my first pick:
- a bit more opinionated / larger
- may be better if you want a full recurring review UI, not just “show me the proposed diff right now”

### Not my first choice here
- **Review Board / Gerrit** — too heavy for this approval-link use case
- **Forgejo/Gitea PRs** — good if changes naturally become PRs, not ideal for fast local approval of ad hoc edits
- **DiffDeck** — neat, but lighter and less proven for the “keep reviewing evolving local diffs” case

So my


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
 Matrix

That seems much closer to your real need than “install a whole code review product.”

### Runner-up
**Diffity** if you want a more polished review workbench with comments and agent-oriented workflow.

Why not my first pick:
- a bit more opinionated / larger
- may be better if you want a full recurring review UI, not just “show me the proposed diff right now”

### Not my first choice here
- **Review Board / Gerrit** — too heavy for this approval-link use case
- **Forgejo/Gitea PRs** — good if changes naturally become PRs, not ideal for fast local approval of ad hoc edits
- **DiffDeck** — neat, but lighter and less proven for the “keep reviewing evolving local diffs” case

So my guidance is:

- **best quick approval-link candidate:** `git-webdiff`
- **best richer local review workbench:** `Diffity`

If you want, next I can compare just those two for:
- install complexity
- whether


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 49.8s
Time: model 48.0s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.1ktok/12.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 267.4k; active 15.0k; cache 252.4k/95%; p≈3.4ktok; ctx 25.5%; usable 29.0%; observed turns 45; actual turns 74


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
ty** if you want a more polished review workbench with comments and agent-oriented workflow.

Why not my first pick:
- a bit more opinionated / larger
- may be better if you want a full recurring review UI, not just “show me the proposed diff right now”

### Not my first choice here
- **Review Board / Gerrit** — too heavy for this approval-link use case
- **Forgejo/Gitea PRs** — good if changes naturally become PRs, not ideal for fast local approval of ad hoc edits
- **DiffDeck** — neat, but lighter and less proven for the “keep reviewing evolving local diffs” case

So my guidance is:

- **best quick approval-link candidate:** `git-webdiff`
- **best richer local review workbench:** `Diffity`

If you want, next I can compare just those two for:
- install complexity
- whether they can stay running here
- how easy it would be to generate a review link automatically from a permission request


* 🟠 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 51.9s
Time: model 50.0s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 269.9k o 409 t 30 est $0.6814; p≈3.1ktok/12.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 267.4k; active 15.0k; cache 252.4k/95%; p≈3.4ktok; ctx 25.5%; usable 29.0%; observed turns 45; actual turns 74


* 🔴 Failed
Stage: model/tool run failed
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 52.5s
Time: model 50.0s
Cause: direct ACP client produced a suspiciously truncated final message: possible_mid_sentence_cutoff
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 267.4k; active 15.0k; cache 252.4k/95%; p≈3.4ktok; ctx 25.5%; usable 29.0%; observed turns 45; actual turns 74


* 🔴 Failed
Stage: no final answer
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 53.0s
Time: model 50.0s
Cause: direct ACP client produced a suspiciously truncated final message: possible_mid_sentence_cutoff
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 267.4k; active 15.0k; cache 252.4k/95%; p≈3.4ktok; ctx 25.5%; usable 29.0%; observed turns 45; actual turns 74


⚠ Matrix-lite did not receive a final answer for this request. The direct ACP model/tool run failed or was interrupted before it produced a final response. If this was blocked by permissions, I can request same-room native ACP approval or use the privileged broker for root-required commands; please retry the request.


* 🔴 Failed
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 53.7s
Time: model 50.0s, overhead 3.6s
Cause: direct ACP client produced a suspiciously truncated final message: possible_mid_sentence_cutoff
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 269.9k o 409 t 30 est $0.6814; p≈3.1ktok/12.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 270.4k; active 270.4k; p≈3.1ktok; ctx 25.5%; usable 29.0%; observed turns 45; actual turns 74


Hmm I still get that error. Can you resend the first part of your message of just summarize?


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 270.4k; active 270.4k; p≈3.1ktok; ctx 25.7%; usable 29.3%; observed turns 46; actual turns 74


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 270.4k; active 270.4k; p≈3.1ktok; ctx 25.7%; usable 29.3%; observed turns 46; actual turns 74


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.8s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 270.4k; active 270.4k; p≈3.1ktok; ctx 25.7%; usable 29.3%; observed turns 46; actual turns 74


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.3s
Time: overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.9ktok/11.7kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 270.4k; active 270.4k; p≈3.1ktok; ctx 25.7%; usable 29.3%; observed turns 46; actual turns 74


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP load session start (1.4s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 270.4k; active 270.4k; p≈3.1ktok; ctx 25.7%; usable 29.3%; observed turns 46; actual turns 74
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP replay drain done (4.4s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 270.4k; active 270.4k; p≈3.1ktok; ctx 25.7%; usable 29.3%; observed turns 46; actual turns 75
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Waiting for first model/tool update…


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 6.9s
Time: model 5.0s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.9ktok/11.7kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 270.4k; active 270.4k; p≈3.1ktok; ctx 25.7%; usable 29.3%; observed turns 46; actual turns 75


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP prompt started (4.4s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 270.4k; active 270.4k; p≈3.1ktok; ctx 25.7%; usable 29.3%; observed turns 46; actual turns 75
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first session update (5.0s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 270.4k; active 270.4k; p≈3.1ktok; ctx 25.7%; usable 29.3%; observed turns 46; actual turns 75
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first visible text (5.0s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 270.4k; active 270.4k; p≈3.1ktok; ctx 25.7%; usable 29.3%; observed turns 46; actual turns 75
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 270.4k; active 270.4k; p≈3.1ktok; ctx 25.7%; usable 29.3%; observed turns 46; actual turns 75
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Short


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 13.1s
Time: model 11.2s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.9ktok/11.7kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 270.4k; active 270.4k; p≈3.1ktok; ctx 25.7%; usable 29.3%; observed turns 46; actual turns 75


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Short version: **git-webdiff** looks like the best fit.

Why:
- local/self-hosted
- good full-diff browser view
- works well for dirty working tree diffs
- hot


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 20.0s
Time: model 18.1s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.9ktok/11.7kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 270.4k; active 270.4k; p≈3.1ktok; ctx 25.7%; usable 29.3%; observed turns 46; actual turns 75


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Short version: **git-webdiff** looks like the best fit.

Why:
- local/self-hosted
- good full-diff browser view
- works well for dirty working tree diffs
- hot reload/watch mode
- simpler to integrate into a permission-request link than a full review platform

Runner-up:
- **Diffity** if you want a richer review workbench rather than just “show me the diff nicely.”


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 21.1s
Time: model 19.2s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 272.9k o 91 est $0.6836; p≈2.9ktok/11.7kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 270.4k; active 270.4k; p≈3.1ktok; ctx 25.7%; usable 29.3%; observed turns 46; actual turns 75


Short version: **git-webdiff** looks like the best fit.

Why:
- local/self-hosted
- good full-diff browser view
- works well for dirty working tree diffs
- hot reload/watch mode
- simpler to integrate into a permission-request link than a full review platform

Runner-up:
- **Diffity** if you want a richer review workbench rather than just “show me the diff nicely.”


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 21.9s
Time: model 19.2s, overhead 2.7s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 272.9k o 91 est $0.6836; p≈2.9ktok/11.7kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 273.0k; active 273.0k; p≈2.9ktok; ctx 25.7%; usable 29.3%; observed turns 46; actual turns 75


Does it work okay on mobile?


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 273.0k; active 273.0k; p≈2.9ktok; ctx 25.7%; usable 29.3%; observed turns 46; actual turns 75


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 273.0k; active 273.0k; p≈2.9ktok; ctx 25.7%; usable 29.3%; observed turns 46; actual turns 75


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.7s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 273.0k; active 273.0k; p≈2.9ktok; ctx 25.7%; usable 29.3%; observed turns 46; actual turns 75


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.3s
Time: overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.7ktok/10.8kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 273.0k; active 273.0k; p≈2.9ktok; ctx 25.7%; usable 29.3%; observed turns 46; actual turns 75


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP load session start (1.3s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 273.0k; active 273.0k; p≈2.9ktok; ctx 25.7%; usable 29.3%; observed turns 46; actual turns 75
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP replay drain done (4.5s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 273.0k; active 273.0k; p≈2.9ktok; ctx 25.7%; usable 29.3%; observed turns 46; actual turns 76
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 6.7s
Time: model 5.0s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.7ktok/10.8kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 273.0k; active 273.0k; p≈2.9ktok; ctx 25.7%; usable 29.3%; observed turns 46; actual turns 76


📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Waiting for first model/tool update…


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP prompt started (4.5s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 273.0k; active 273.0k; p≈2.9ktok; ctx 25.7%; usable 29.3%; observed turns 46; actual turns 76
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 12.6s
Time: model 10.9s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.7ktok/10.8kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 273.0k; active 273.0k; p≈2.9ktok; ctx 25.7%; usable 29.3%; observed turns 46; actual turns 76


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first session update (10.1s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 273.0k; active 273.0k; p≈2.9ktok; ctx 25.7%; usable 29.3%; observed turns 46; actual turns 76
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 18.3s
Time: model 16.5s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.7ktok/10.8kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 273.0k; active 273.0k; p≈2.9ktok; ctx 25.7%; usable 29.3%; observed turns 46; actual turns 76


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first tool update (12.1s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 273.0k; active 273.0k; p≈2.9ktok; ctx 25.7%; usable 29.3%; observed turns 46; actual turns 76
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 273.0k; active 273.0k; p≈2.9ktok; ctx 25.7%; usable 29.3%; observed turns 46; actual turns 76
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (1):
- websearch / pending / call_szM1Zhkuc7x2S37d5ajAmxu


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 24.2s
Time: model 22.5s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.7ktok/10.8kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 273.0k; active 273.0k; p≈2.9ktok; ctx 25.7%; usable 29.3%; observed turns 46; actual turns 76


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first visible text (20.8s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 273.0k; active 273.0k; p≈2.9ktok; ctx 25.7%; usable 29.3%; observed turns 46; actual turns 76
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (6):
- websearch / pending / call_szM1Zhkuc7x2S37d5ajAmxu
- websearch / in_progress / call_szM1Zhkuc7x2S37d5ajAmxu
- websearch / pending / call_C0FILMqGHO911qxRTGhzM38
- websearch / in_progress / call_C0FILMqGHO911qxRTGhzM38
- Web search: git-webdiff mobile responsive browser UI review 2026 / completed / call_szM1Zhkuc7x2S37d5ajAmxu
- Web search: Diffity mobile responsive diff viewer 2026 / completed / call_C0FILMqGHO911qxRTGhzM38

Draft:
Probably


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 29.8s
Time: model 28.0s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.7ktok/10.8kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 273.0k; active 273.0k; p≈2.9ktok; ctx 25.7%; usable 29.3%; observed turns 46; actual turns 76


🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 273.0k; active 273.0k; p≈2.9ktok; ctx 26.0%; usable 29.6%; observed turns 47; actual turns 76
Label: persistent-chat


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (6):
- websearch / pending / call_szM1Zhkuc7x2S37d5ajAmxu
- websearch / in_progress / call_szM1Zhkuc7x2S37d5ajAmxu
- websearch / pending / call_C0FILMqGHO911qxRTGhzM38
- websearch / in_progress / call_C0FILMqGHO911qxRTGhzM38
- Web search: git-webdiff mobile responsive browser UI review 2026 / completed / call_szM1Zhkuc7x2S37d5ajAmxu
- Web search: Diffity mobile responsive diff viewer 2026 / completed / call_C0FILMqGHO911qxRTGhzM38

Draft:
Probably **usable, but not ideal**.

For **git-webdiff** specifically, I found lots about:
- multi-file scrolling
- hot reload
- command bar
- keyboard shortcuts
- desktop-style review flow

I did **not** find an explicit mobile-friendly


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 273.0k; active 273.0k; p≈2.9ktok; ctx 26.0%; usable 29.6%; observed turns 47; actual turns 76
Label: persistent-chat


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 34.9s
Time: model 33.1s, overhead 1.2s
Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈2.7ktok/10.8kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 273.0k; active 273.0k; p≈2.9ktok; ctx 26.0%; usable 29.6%; observed turns 47; actual turns 76


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (6):
- websearch / pending / call_szM1Zhkuc7x2S37d5ajAmxu
- websearch / in_progress / call_szM1Zhkuc7x2S37d5ajAmxu
- websearch / pending / call_C0FILMqGHO911qxRTGhzM38
- websearch / in_progress / call_C0FILMqGHO911qxRTGhzM38
- Web search: git-webdiff mobile responsive browser UI review 2026 / completed / call_szM1Zhkuc7x2S37d5ajAmxu
- Web search: Diffity mobile responsive diff viewer 2026 / completed / call_C0FILMqGHO911qxRTGhzM38

Draft:
Probably **usable, but not ideal**.

For **git-webdiff** specifically, I found lots about:
- multi-file scrolling
- hot reload
- command bar
- keyboard shortcuts
- desktop-style review flow

I did **not** find an explicit mobile-friendly claim. That usually means:
- okay in a phone browser for quick inspection
- not something I’d trust as a pleasant primary review UI on mobile

So my more adversarial take is:

- **git-webdiff** is still the best fit for your approval


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (6):
- websearch / pending / call_szM1Zhkuc7x2S37d5ajAmxu
- websearch / in_progress / call_szM1Zhkuc7x2S37d5ajAmxu
- websearch / pending / call_C0FILMqGHO911qxRTGhzM38
- websearch / in_progress / call_C0FILMqGHO911qxRTGhzM38
- Web search: git-webdiff mobile responsive browser UI review 2026 / completed / call_szM1Zhkuc7x2S37d5ajAmxu
- Web search: Diffity mobile responsive diff viewer 2026 / completed / call_C0FILMqGHO911qxRTGhzM38

Draft:
Probably **usable, but not ideal**.

For **git-webdiff** specifically, I found lots about:
- multi-file scrolling
- hot reload
- command bar
- keyboard shortcuts
- desktop-style review flow

I did **not** find an explicit mobile-friendly claim. That usually means:
- okay in a phone browser for quick inspection
- not something I’d trust as a pleasant primary review UI on mobile

So my more adversarial take is:

- **git-webdiff** is still the best fit for your approval-link workflow overall
- but **mobile UX is likely a weak point**

If mobile matters a lot, then:
- **Diffity** might be the better bet to test second, because it’s more polished as a review UI
- but I still didn’t find a clear “mobile-first


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 41.3s
Time: model 39.6s, overhead 1.2s
Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈2.7ktok/10.8kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 273.0k; active 273.0k; p≈2.9ktok; ctx 26.0%; usable 29.6%; observed turns 47; actual turns 76


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (6):
- websearch / pending / call_szM1Zhkuc7x2S37d5ajAmxu
- websearch / in_progress / call_szM1Zhkuc7x2S37d5ajAmxu
- websearch / pending / call_C0FILMqGHO911qxRTGhzM38
- websearch / in_progress / call_C0FILMqGHO911qxRTGhzM38
- Web search: git-webdiff mobile responsive browser UI review 2026 / completed / call_szM1Zhkuc7x2S37d5ajAmxu
- Web search: Diffity mobile responsive diff viewer 2026 / completed / call_C0FILMqGHO911qxRTGhzM38

Draft:
t not ideal**.

For **git-webdiff** specifically, I found lots about:
- multi-file scrolling
- hot reload
- command bar
- keyboard shortcuts
- desktop-style review flow

I did **not** find an explicit mobile-friendly claim. That usually means:
- okay in a phone browser for quick inspection
- not something I’d trust as a pleasant primary review UI on mobile

So my more adversarial take is:

- **git-webdiff** is still the best fit for your approval-link workflow overall
- but **mobile UX is likely a weak point**

If mobile matters a lot, then:
- **Diffity** might be the better bet to test second, because it’s more polished as a review UI
- but I still didn’t find a clear “mobile-first” promise there either

So the honest answer is:
- **desktop/laptop:** yes, good fit
- **mobile:** probably serviceable, not great

If you want true mobile friendliness, we should test before committing to it.


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 44.0s
Time: model 42.3s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 8.5k o 221 t 129 cache 274.9k/97% est $0.0265; p≈2.7ktok/10.8kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 273.0k; active 273.0k; p≈2.9ktok; ctx 26.0%; usable 29.6%; observed turns 47; actual turns 76


Probably **usable, but not ideal**.

For **git-webdiff** specifically, I found lots about:
- multi-file scrolling
- hot reload
- command bar
- keyboard shortcuts
- desktop-style review flow

I did **not** find an explicit mobile-friendly claim. That usually means:
- okay in a phone browser for quick inspection
- not something I’d trust as a pleasant primary review UI on mobile

So my more adversarial take is:

- **git-webdiff** is still the best fit for your approval-link workflow overall
- but **mobile UX is likely a weak point**

If mobile matters a lot, then:
- **Diffity** might be the better bet to test second, because it’s more polished as a review UI
- but I still didn’t find a clear “mobile-first” promise there either

So the honest answer is:
- **desktop/laptop:** yes, good fit
- **mobile:** probably serviceable, not great

If you want true mobile friendliness, we should test before committing to it.


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 44.7s
Time: model 42.3s, overhead 2.4s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 8.5k o 221 t 129 cache 274.9k/97% est $0.0265; p≈2.7ktok/10.8kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 26.0%; usable 29.6%; observed turns 47; actual turns 76


Let's just test it, can you install it? You should be able to now


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 76


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 76


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.7s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 76


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.2s
Time: overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 76


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP load session start (1.3s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 76
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP replay drain done (4.7s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 77
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 6.6s
Time: model 5.0s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 77


📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Waiting for first model/tool update…


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP prompt started (4.7s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 77
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 12.5s
Time: model 10.8s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 77


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first session update (10.0s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 77
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first tool update (10.0s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 77
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 77
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (1):
- bash / pending / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 17.9s
Time: model 16.3s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 77


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (3):
- bash / pending / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- bash / in_progress / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- Lists temp install directory / completed / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 23.2s
Time: model 21.6s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 77


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (4):
- bash / pending / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- bash / in_progress / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- Lists temp install directory / completed / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- bash / pending / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog


🟠 Approval requested
Stage: same-room native ACP permission; active turn is waiting
Approval: dap-1779745439-perm-1779745438995-1
Summary: OpenCode requests bash for execute
Tool: bash
Kind: execute
Details: OpenCode did not provide path/command details for this request.
React ✅ allow once, ❌ deny. Not sudo/root.
Options: allow_once, reject_once


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 28.6s
Time: model 27.0s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 77


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 33.9s
Time: model 32.3s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 77


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 39.4s
Time: model 37.8s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 77


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 44.9s
Time: model 43.3s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 77


* 🟡 Approval granted
Stage: resuming
Tool: bash
Approval: dap-1779745439-perm-1779745438995-1


🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 77
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (5):
- bash / pending / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- bash / in_progress / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- Lists temp install directory / completed / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- bash / pending / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog
- bash / in_progress / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 50.4s
Time: model 48.8s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 77


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (6):
- bash / pending / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- bash / in_progress / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- Lists temp install directory / completed / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- bash / pending / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog
- bash / in_progress / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog
- Installs git-webdiff in temp venv / completed / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 55.9s
Time: model 54.2s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 77


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 77
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (7):
- bash / pending / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- bash / in_progress / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- Lists temp install directory / completed / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- bash / pending / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog
- bash / in_progress / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog
- Installs git-webdiff in temp venv / completed / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog
- bash / pending / call_Nnr63Z7NHQpCeuPnFfBrhMg


🟠 Approval requested
Stage: same-room native ACP permission; active turn is waiting
Approval: dap-1779745471-perm-1779745471673-2
Summary: OpenCode requests bash for execute
Tool: bash
Kind: execute
Details: OpenCode did not provide path/command details for this request.
React ✅ allow once, ❌ deny. Not sudo/root.
Options: allow_once, reject_once


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 61.3s
Time: model 59.7s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 77


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 66.6s
Time: model 65.0s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 77


* 🟡 Approval granted
Stage: resuming
Tool: bash
Approval: dap-1779745471-perm-1779745471673-2


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 72.2s
Time: model 70.5s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 77


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (8):
- bash / pending / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- bash / in_progress / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- Lists temp install directory / completed / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- bash / pending / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog
- bash / in_progress / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog
- Installs git-webdiff in temp venv / completed / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog
- bash / pending / call_Nnr63Z7NHQpCeuPnFfBrhMg
- bash / in_progress / call_Nnr63Z7NHQpCeuPnFfBrhMg


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (9):
- bash / pending / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- bash / in_progress / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- Lists temp install directory / completed / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- bash / pending / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog
- bash / in_progress / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog
- Installs git-webdiff in temp venv / completed / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog
- bash / pending / call_Nnr63Z7NHQpCeuPnFfBrhMg
- bash / in_progress / call_Nnr63Z7NHQpCeuPnFfBrhMg
- Installs git-webdiff from GitHub / completed / call_Nnr63Z7NHQpCeuPnFfBrhMg


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 78.1s
Time: model 76.4s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 77


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (10):
- bash / pending / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- bash / in_progress / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- Lists temp install directory / completed / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- bash / pending / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog
- bash / in_progress / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog
- Installs git-webdiff in temp venv / completed / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog
- bash / pending / call_Nnr63Z7NHQpCeuPnFfBrhMg
- bash / in_progress / call_Nnr63Z7NHQpCeuPnFfBrhMg
- Installs git-webdiff from GitHub / completed / call_Nnr63Z7NHQpCeuPnFfBrhMg
- bash / pending / call_kAHh1o2DAHQUaN4yQgz4QpW


🟠 Approval requested
Stage: same-room native ACP permission; active turn is waiting
Approval: dap-1779745494-perm-1779745493959-3
Summary: OpenCode requests bash for execute
Tool: bash
Kind: execute
Details: OpenCode did not provide path/command details for this request.
React ✅ allow once, ❌ deny. Not sudo/root.
Options: allow_once, reject_once


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 83.6s
Time: model 81.9s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 77


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 89.0s
Time: model 87.3s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 77


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 94.5s
Time: model 92.8s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 77


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 100.0s
Time: model 98.3s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 77


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 105.5s
Time: model 103.8s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 77


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 111.0s
Time: model 109.3s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 77


* 🟡 Approval granted
Stage: resuming
Tool: bash
Approval: dap-1779745494-perm-1779745493959-3


🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 77
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (11):
- bash / pending / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- bash / in_progress / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- Lists temp install directory / completed / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- bash / pending / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog
- bash / in_progress / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog
- Installs git-webdiff in temp venv / completed / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog
- bash / pending / call_Nnr63Z7NHQpCeuPnFfBrhMg
- bash / in_progress / call_Nnr63Z7NHQpCeuPnFfBrhMg
- Installs git-webdiff from GitHub / completed / call_Nnr63Z7NHQpCeuPnFfBrhMg
- bash / pending / call_kAHh1o2DAHQUaN4yQgz4QpW
- bash / in_progress / call_kAHh1o2DAHQUaN4yQgz4QpW


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 77
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 116.6s
Time: model 114.9s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 77


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (13):
- bash / pending / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- bash / in_progress / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- Lists temp install directory / completed / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- bash / pending / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog
- bash / in_progress / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog
- Installs git-webdiff in temp venv / completed / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog
- bash / pending / call_Nnr63Z7NHQpCeuPnFfBrhMg
- bash / in_progress / call_Nnr63Z7NHQpCeuPnFfBrhMg
- Installs git-webdiff from GitHub / completed / call_Nnr63Z7NHQpCeuPnFfBrhMg
- bash / pending / call_kAHh1o2DAHQUaN4yQgz4QpW
- bash / in_progress / call_kAHh1o2DAHQUaN4yQgz4QpW
- Clones git-webdiff source repo / completed / call_kAHh1o2DAHQUaN4yQgz4QpW
- bash / pending / call_SDq06u7GGW9m4uwxRwQMx6r


🟠 Approval requested
Stage: same-room native ACP permission; active turn is waiting
Approval: dap-1779745532-perm-1779745532259-4
Summary: OpenCode requests bash for execute
Tool: bash
Kind: execute
Details: OpenCode did not provide path/command details for this request.
React ✅ allow once, ❌ deny. Not sudo/root.
Options: allow_once, reject_once


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 122.1s
Time: model 120.4s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 77


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 127.4s
Time: model 125.8s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 77


* 🟡 Approval granted
Stage: resuming
Tool: bash
Approval: dap-1779745532-perm-1779745532259-4


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (14):
- bash / pending / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- bash / in_progress / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- Lists temp install directory / completed / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- bash / pending / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog
- bash / in_progress / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog
- Installs git-webdiff in temp venv / completed / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog
- bash / pending / call_Nnr63Z7NHQpCeuPnFfBrhMg
- bash / in_progress / call_Nnr63Z7NHQpCeuPnFfBrhMg
- Installs git-webdiff from GitHub / completed / call_Nnr63Z7NHQpCeuPnFfBrhMg
- bash / pending / call_kAHh1o2DAHQUaN4yQgz4QpW
- bash / in_progress / call_kAHh1o2DAHQUaN4yQgz4QpW
- Clones git-webdiff source repo / completed / call_kAHh1o2DAHQUaN4yQgz4QpW
- bash / pending / call_SDq06u7GGW9m4uwxRwQMx6r
- bash / in_progress / call_SDq06u7GGW9m4uwxRwQMx6r


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 133.0s
Time: model 131.3s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 77


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (16):
- bash / pending / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- bash / in_progress / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- Lists temp install directory / completed / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- bash / pending / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog
- bash / in_progress / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog
- Installs git-webdiff in temp venv / completed / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog
- bash / pending / call_Nnr63Z7NHQpCeuPnFfBrhMg
- bash / in_progress / call_Nnr63Z7NHQpCeuPnFfBrhMg
- Installs git-webdiff from GitHub / completed / call_Nnr63Z7NHQpCeuPnFfBrhMg
- bash / pending / call_kAHh1o2DAHQUaN4yQgz4QpW
- bash / in_progress / call_kAHh1o2DAHQUaN4yQgz4QpW
- Clones git-webdiff source repo / completed / call_kAHh1o2DAHQUaN4yQgz4QpW
- bash / pending / call_SDq06u7GGW9m4uwxRwQMx6r
- bash / in_progress / call_SDq06u7GGW9m4uwxRwQMx6r
- Checks uv availability / completed / call_SDq06u7GGW9m4uwxRwQMx6r
- read / pending / call_CAFqokcpRujOrO1EM33DvHo


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 138.4s
Time: model 136.8s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 77


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 144.0s
Time: model 142.4s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 77


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first visible text (141.7s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 77
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (21):
- bash / pending / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- bash / in_progress / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- Lists temp install directory / completed / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- bash / pending / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog
- bash / in_progress / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog
- Installs git-webdiff in temp venv / completed / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog
- bash / pending / call_Nnr63Z7NHQpCeuPnFfBrhMg
- bash / in_progress / call_Nnr63Z7NHQpCeuPnFfBrhMg
- Installs git-webdiff from GitHub / completed / call_Nnr63Z7NHQpCeuPnFfBrhMg
- bash / pending / call_kAHh1o2DAHQUaN4yQgz4QpW
- bash / in_progress / call_kAHh1o2DAHQUaN4yQgz4QpW
- Clones git-webdiff source repo / completed / call_kAHh1o2DAHQUaN4yQgz4QpW
- bash / pending / call_SDq06u7GGW9m4uwxRwQMx6r
- bash / in_progress / call_SDq06u7GGW9m4uwxRwQMx6r
- Checks uv availability / completed / call_SDq06u7GGW9m4uwxRwQMx6r
- read / pending / call_CAFqokcpRujOrO1EM33DvHo
- read / in_progress / call_CAFqokcpRujOrO1EM33DvHo
- read / pending / call_rn9eOONPo2Loq3G1tREe3iq
- ../../tmp/opencode/git-webdiff-test/src/git-webdiff/pyproject.toml / completed / call_CAFqokcpRujOrO1EM33DvHo
- read / in_progress / call_rn9eOONPo2Loq3G1tREe3iq
- ../../tmp/opencode/git-webdiff-test/src/git-webdiff/README.md / completed / call_rn9eOONPo2Loq3G1tREe3iq

Draft:
For


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 149.5s
Time: model 147.9s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 77


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (21):
- bash / pending / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- bash / in_progress / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- Lists temp install directory / completed / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- bash / pending / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog
- bash / in_progress / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog
- Installs git-webdiff in temp venv / completed / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog
- bash / pending / call_Nnr63Z7NHQpCeuPnFfBrhMg
- bash / in_progress / call_Nnr63Z7NHQpCeuPnFfBrhMg
- Installs git-webdiff from GitHub / completed / call_Nnr63Z7NHQpCeuPnFfBrhMg
- bash / pending / call_kAHh1o2DAHQUaN4yQgz4QpW
- bash / in_progress / call_kAHh1o2DAHQUaN4yQgz4QpW
- Clones git-webdiff source repo / completed / call_kAHh1o2DAHQUaN4yQgz4QpW
- bash / pending / call_SDq06u7GGW9m4uwxRwQMx6r
- bash / in_progress / call_SDq06u7GGW9m4uwxRwQMx6r
- Checks uv availability / completed / call_SDq06u7GGW9m4uwxRwQMx6r
- read / pending / call_CAFqokcpRujOrO1EM33DvHo
- read / in_progress / call_CAFqokcpRujOrO1EM33DvHo
- read / pending / call_rn9eOONPo2Loq3G1tREe3iq
- ../../tmp/opencode/git-webdiff-test/src/git-webdiff/pyproject.toml / completed / call_CAFqokcpRujOrO1EM33DvHo
- read / in_progress / call_rn9eOONPo2Loq3G1tREe3iq
- ../../tmp/opencode/git-webdiff-test/src/git-webdiff/README.md / completed / call_rn9eOONPo2Loq3G1tREe3iq

Draft:
For **git-webdiff**: probably **okay enough to inspect**, but I wouldn’t call it mobile-optimized.

Why:
- its docs/readme talk about multi-file desktop review, command bar, keyboard shortcuts, watch


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 155.7s
Time: model 154.1s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 77


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 77
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (21):
- bash / pending / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- bash / in_progress / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- Lists temp install directory / completed / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- bash / pending / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog
- bash / in_progress / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog
- Installs git-webdiff in temp venv / completed / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog
- bash / pending / call_Nnr63Z7NHQpCeuPnFfBrhMg
- bash / in_progress / call_Nnr63Z7NHQpCeuPnFfBrhMg
- Installs git-webdiff from GitHub / completed / call_Nnr63Z7NHQpCeuPnFfBrhMg
- bash / pending / call_kAHh1o2DAHQUaN4yQgz4QpW
- bash / in_progress / call_kAHh1o2DAHQUaN4yQgz4QpW
- Clones git-webdiff source repo / completed / call_kAHh1o2DAHQUaN4yQgz4QpW
- bash / pending / call_SDq06u7GGW9m4uwxRwQMx6r
- bash / in_progress / call_SDq06u7GGW9m4uwxRwQMx6r
- Checks uv availability / completed / call_SDq06u7GGW9m4uwxRwQMx6r
- read / pending / call_CAFqokcpRujOrO1EM33DvHo
- read / in_progress / call_CAFqokcpRujOrO1EM33DvHo
- read / pending / call_rn9eOONPo2Loq3G1tREe3iq
- ../../tmp/opencode/git-webdiff-test/src/git-webdiff/pyproject.toml / completed / call_CAFqokcpRujOrO1EM33DvHo
- read / in_progress / call_rn9eOONPo2Loq3G1tREe3iq
- ../../tmp/opencode/git-webdiff-test/src/git-webdiff/README.md / completed / call_rn9eOONPo2Loq3G1tREe3iq

Draft:
For **git-webdiff**: probably **okay enough to inspect**, but I wouldn’t call it mobile-optimized.

Why:
- its docs/readme talk about multi-file desktop review, command bar, keyboard shortcuts, watch mode
- I didn’t find an explicit mobile/responsive claim

So my guidance is:
- **desktop/laptop:** yes
- **phone:** likely workable for quick approval, but not pleasant for heavy review


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (21):
- bash / pending / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- bash / in_progress / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- Lists temp install directory / completed / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- bash / pending / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog
- bash / in_progress / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog
- Installs git-webdiff in temp venv / completed / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog
- bash / pending / call_Nnr63Z7NHQpCeuPnFfBrhMg
- bash / in_progress / call_Nnr63Z7NHQpCeuPnFfBrhMg
- Installs git-webdiff from GitHub / completed / call_Nnr63Z7NHQpCeuPnFfBrhMg
- bash / pending / call_kAHh1o2DAHQUaN4yQgz4QpW
- bash / in_progress / call_kAHh1o2DAHQUaN4yQgz4QpW
- Clones git-webdiff source repo / completed / call_kAHh1o2DAHQUaN4yQgz4QpW
- bash / pending / call_SDq06u7GGW9m4uwxRwQMx6r
- bash / in_progress / call_SDq06u7GGW9m4uwxRwQMx6r
- Checks uv availability / completed / call_SDq06u7GGW9m4uwxRwQMx6r
- read / pending / call_CAFqokcpRujOrO1EM33DvHo
- read / in_progress / call_CAFqokcpRujOrO1EM33DvHo
- read / pending / call_rn9eOONPo2Loq3G1tREe3iq
- ../../tmp/opencode/git-webdiff-test/src/git-webdiff/pyproject.toml / completed / call_CAFqokcpRujOrO1EM33DvHo
- read / in_progress / call_rn9eOONPo2Loq3G1tREe3iq
- ../../tmp/opencode/git-webdiff-test/src/git-webdiff/README.md / completed / call_rn9eOONPo2Loq3G1tREe3iq

Draft:
For **git-webdiff**: probably **okay enough to inspect**, but I wouldn’t call it mobile-optimized.

Why:
- its docs/readme talk about multi-file desktop review, command bar, keyboard shortcuts, watch mode
- I didn’t find an explicit mobile/responsive claim

So my guidance is:
- **desktop/laptop:** yes
- **phone:** likely workable for quick approval, but not pleasant for heavy review

If mobile matters a lot, one interesting alternative is **DiffyViewer**:
- explicitly says **mobile support**
- responsive layout
- unified view default on mobile

But that one is more of a generic patch viewer, less


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 162.2s
Time: model 160.6s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 77


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (21):
- bash / pending / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- bash / in_progress / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- Lists temp install directory / completed / call_vU8SJ6sxF3HHID40PtCZAvW
- bash / pending / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog
- bash / in_progress / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog
- Installs git-webdiff in temp venv / completed / call_PEwEhrkzliYds1nlbGyfmog
- bash / pending / call_Nnr63Z7NHQpCeuPnFfBrhMg
- bash / in_progress / call_Nnr63Z7NHQpCeuPnFfBrhMg
- Installs git-webdiff from GitHub / completed / call_Nnr63Z7NHQpCeuPnFfBrhMg
- bash / pending / call_kAHh1o2DAHQUaN4yQgz4QpW
- bash / in_progress / call_kAHh1o2DAHQUaN4yQgz4QpW
- Clones git-webdiff source repo / completed / call_kAHh1o2DAHQUaN4yQgz4QpW
- bash / pending / call_SDq06u7GGW9m4uwxRwQMx6r
- bash / in_progress / call_SDq06u7GGW9m4uwxRwQMx6r
- Checks uv availability / completed / call_SDq06u7GGW9m4uwxRwQMx6r
- read / pending / call_CAFqokcpRujOrO1EM33DvHo
- read / in_progress / call_CAFqokcpRujOrO1EM33DvHo
- read / pending / call_rn9eOONPo2Loq3G1tREe3iq
- ../../tmp/opencode/git-webdiff-test/src/git-webdiff/pyproject.toml / completed / call_CAFqokcpRujOrO1EM33DvHo
- read / in_progress / call_rn9eOONPo2Loq3G1tREe3iq
- ../../tmp/opencode/git-webdiff-test/src/git-webdiff/README.md / completed / call_rn9eOONPo2Loq3G1tREe3iq

Draft:
For **git-webdiff**: probably **okay enough to inspect**, but I wouldn’t call it mobile-optimized.

Why:
- its docs/readme talk about multi-file desktop review, command bar, keyboard shortcuts, watch mode
- I didn’t find an explicit mobile/responsive claim

So my guidance is:
- **desktop/laptop:** yes
- **phone:** likely workable for quick approval, but not pleasant for heavy review

If mobile matters a lot, one interesting alternative is **DiffyViewer**:
- explicitly says **mobile support**
- responsive layout
- unified view default on mobile

But that one is more of a generic patch viewer, less purpose-built for live git approval flow than `git-webdiff`.

So:
- **best workflow fit:** `git-webdiff`
- **best explicit mobile signal:** `DiffyViewer`


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 165.3s
Time: model 163.6s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 3.1k o 179 t 91 cache 287.2k/99% est $0.0117; p≈2.5ktok/10.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 283.8k; active 8.9k; cache 274.9k/97%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 77


For **git-webdiff**: probably **okay enough to inspect**, but I wouldn’t call it mobile-optimized.

Why:
- its docs/readme talk about multi-file desktop review, command bar, keyboard shortcuts, watch mode
- I didn’t find an explicit mobile/responsive claim

So my guidance is:
- **desktop/laptop:** yes
- **phone:** likely workable for quick approval, but not pleasant for heavy review

If mobile matters a lot, one interesting alternative is **DiffyViewer**:
- explicitly says **mobile support**
- responsive layout
- unified view default on mobile

But that one is more of a generic patch viewer, less purpose-built for live git approval flow than `git-webdiff`.

So:
- **best workflow fit:** `git-webdiff`
- **best explicit mobile signal:** `DiffyViewer`


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 165.9s
Time: model 163.6s, overhead 2.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 3.1k o 179 t 91 cache 287.2k/99% est $0.0117; p≈2.5ktok/10.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 290.6k; active 3.3k; cache 287.2k/99%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 30.8%; observed turns 48; actual turns 77


So did you install it?


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 290.6k; active 3.3k; cache 287.2k/99%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 77


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 290.6k; active 3.3k; cache 287.2k/99%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 77


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.7s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 290.6k; active 3.3k; cache 287.2k/99%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 77


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.3s
Time: overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.7ktok/10.9kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 290.6k; active 3.3k; cache 287.2k/99%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 77


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP load session start (1.4s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 290.6k; active 3.3k; cache 287.2k/99%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 77
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP replay drain done (4.7s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 290.6k; active 3.3k; cache 287.2k/99%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 78
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 6.8s
Time: model 5.0s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.7ktok/10.9kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 290.6k; active 3.3k; cache 287.2k/99%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 78


📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Waiting for first model/tool update…


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP prompt started (4.7s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 290.6k; active 3.3k; cache 287.2k/99%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 78
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first session update (5.0s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 290.6k; active 3.3k; cache 287.2k/99%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 78
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first visible text (5.0s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 290.6k; active 3.3k; cache 287.2k/99%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 78
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 290.6k; active 3.3k; cache 287.2k/99%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 78
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 12.5s
Time: model 10.7s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.7ktok/10.9kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 290.6k; active 3.3k; cache 287.2k/99%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 78


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Not


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Not successfully.

What I actually found:
- `pip install git-webdiff` failed because there is **no package under that name**
- I then cloned the repo and checked it
- the project is actually packaged


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 18.6s
Time: model 16.8s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.7ktok/10.9kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 290.6k; active 3.3k; cache 287.2k/99%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 78


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Not successfully.

What I actually found:
- `pip install git-webdiff` failed because there is **no package under that name**
- I then cloned the repo and checked it
- the project is actually packaged as **`webdiff`** in `pyproject.toml`
- installing from GitHub also failed because the repo currently has a **broken Python package discovery/build setup** (`Multiple top-level packages discovered in a


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 24.4s
Time: model 22.6s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.7ktok/10.9kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 290.6k; active 3.3k; cache 287.2k/99%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 78


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Not successfully.

What I actually found:
- `pip install git-webdiff` failed because there is **no package under that name**
- I then cloned the repo and checked it
- the project is actually packaged as **`webdiff`** in `pyproject.toml`
- installing from GitHub also failed because the repo currently has a **broken Python package discovery/build setup** (`Multiple top-level packages discovered in a flat-layout: ['ts', 'webdiff']`)
- it also expects **`uv`** to be present, and `uv` is not installed here right now

So: **no, git-webdiff is not installed


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Not successfully.

What I actually found:
- `pip install git-webdiff` failed because there is **no package under that name**
- I then cloned the repo and checked it
- the project is actually packaged as **`webdiff`** in `pyproject.toml`
- installing from GitHub also failed because the repo currently has a **broken Python package discovery/build setup** (`Multiple top-level packages discovered in a flat-layout: ['ts', 'webdiff']`)
- it also expects **`uv`** to be present, and `uv` is not installed here right now

So: **no, git-webdiff is not installed yet**. The blocker is not permissions anymore; it’s that the project’s current install path is a bit broken/awkward.


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 28.4s
Time: model 26.6s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 285.6k o 163 cache 6.7k/2% est $0.7165; p≈2.7ktok/10.9kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 290.6k; active 3.3k; cache 287.2k/99%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 78


Not successfully.

What I actually found:
- `pip install git-webdiff` failed because there is **no package under that name**
- I then cloned the repo and checked it
- the project is actually packaged as **`webdiff`** in `pyproject.toml`
- installing from GitHub also failed because the repo currently has a **broken Python package discovery/build setup** (`Multiple top-level packages discovered in a flat-layout: ['ts', 'webdiff']`)
- it also expects **`uv`** to be present, and `uv` is not installed here right now

So: **no, git-webdiff is not installed yet**. The blocker is not permissions anymore; it’s that the project’s current install path is a bit broken/awkward.


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 29.3s
Time: model 26.6s, overhead 2.7s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 285.6k o 163 cache 6.7k/2% est $0.7165; p≈2.7ktok/10.9kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 292.5k; active 285.8k; cache 6.7k/2%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 78


Well if we have to deal with this we might as well write one ourselves. The point was to use something easy


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 292.5k; active 285.8k; cache 6.7k/2%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 78


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 292.5k; active 285.8k; cache 6.7k/2%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 78


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.7s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 292.5k; active 285.8k; cache 6.7k/2%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 78


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.2s
Time: overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.8ktok/11.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 292.5k; active 285.8k; cache 6.7k/2%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 78


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP load session start (1.5s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 292.5k; active 285.8k; cache 6.7k/2%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 78
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 7.0s
Time: model 5.0s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.8ktok/11.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 292.5k; active 285.8k; cache 6.7k/2%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 79


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP replay drain done (5.0s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 292.5k; active 285.8k; cache 6.7k/2%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 79
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Waiting for first model/tool update…


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP prompt started (5.0s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 292.5k; active 285.8k; cache 6.7k/2%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 79
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first session update (4.1s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 292.5k; active 285.8k; cache 6.7k/2%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 79
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first visible text (4.1s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 292.5k; active 285.8k; cache 6.7k/2%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 79
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 292.5k; active 285.8k; cache 6.7k/2%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 79
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Yeah


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 12.9s
Time: model 11.0s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.8ktok/11.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 292.5k; active 285.8k; cache 6.7k/2%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 79


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Yeah — that’s the right pushback.

If a “simple off-the-shelf tool” immediately turns into:
- weird packaging
- missing runtime deps
- repo surgery
- manual install glue


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 19.7s
Time: model 17.7s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.8ktok/11.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 292.5k; active 285.8k; cache 6.7k/2%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 79


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Yeah — that’s the right pushback.

If a “simple off-the-shelf tool” immediately turns into:
- weird packaging
- missing runtime deps
- repo surgery
- manual install glue

then it’s failing the actual selection criteria.

So in practice:
- **git-webdiff** may still be interesting technically
- but it failed the “easy to adopt right now” test

At that point


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Yeah — that’s the right pushback.

If a “simple off-the-shelf tool” immediately turns into:
- weird packaging
- missing runtime deps
- repo surgery
- manual install glue

then it’s failing the actual selection criteria.

So in practice:
- **git-webdiff** may still be interesting technically
- but it failed the “easy to adopt right now” test

At that point, writing a very small purpose-built viewer can be more rational than integrating a flaky half-packaged project.

The key question is scope:
- if all you need is **render unified git diff in browser + stable local link + mobile-readable layout**


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 25.7s
Time: model 23.7s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.8ktok/11.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 292.5k; active 285.8k; cache 6.7k/2%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 79


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Yeah — that’s the right pushback.

If a “simple off-the-shelf tool” immediately turns into:
- weird packaging
- missing runtime deps
- repo surgery
- manual install glue

then it’s failing the actual selection criteria.

So in practice:
- **git-webdiff** may still be interesting technically
- but it failed the “easy to adopt right now” test

At that point, writing a very small purpose-built viewer can be more rational than integrating a flaky half-packaged project.

The key question is scope:
- if all you need is **render unified git diff in browser + stable local link + mobile-readable layout**
- that is much smaller than “build a whole code review product”

So I’d say:
- reject `git-webdiff` as the easy option
- either test a more minimal/mobile-friendly existing viewer
- or


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Yeah — that’s the right pushback.

If a “simple off-the-shelf tool” immediately turns into:
- weird packaging
- missing runtime deps
- repo surgery
- manual install glue

then it’s failing the actual selection criteria.

So in practice:
- **git-webdiff** may still be interesting technically
- but it failed the “easy to adopt right now” test

At that point, writing a very small purpose-built viewer can be more rational than integrating a flaky half-packaged project.

The key question is scope:
- if all you need is **render unified git diff in browser + stable local link + mobile-readable layout**
- that is much smaller than “build a whole code review product”

So I’d say:
- reject `git-webdiff` as the easy option
- either test a more minimal/mobile-friendly existing viewer
- or build the tiny thing you actually need, instead of inheriting somebody else’s messy stack.


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 30.7s
Time: model 28.7s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 3.1k o 198 cache 291.8k/99% est $0.0108; p≈2.8ktok/11.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 292.5k; active 285.8k; cache 6.7k/2%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 79


Yeah — that’s the right pushback.

If a “simple off-the-shelf tool” immediately turns into:
- weird packaging
- missing runtime deps
- repo surgery
- manual install glue

then it’s failing the actual selection criteria.

So in practice:
- **git-webdiff** may still be interesting technically
- but it failed the “easy to adopt right now” test

At that point, writing a very small purpose-built viewer can be more rational than integrating a flaky half-packaged project.

The key question is scope:
- if all you need is **render unified git diff in browser + stable local link + mobile-readable layout**
- that is much smaller than “build a whole code review product”

So I’d say:
- reject `git-webdiff` as the easy option
- either test a more minimal/mobile-friendly existing viewer
- or build the tiny thing you actually need, instead of inheriting somebody else’s messy stack.


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 31.2s
Time: model 28.7s, overhead 2.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 3.1k o 198 cache 291.8k/99% est $0.0108; p≈2.8ktok/11.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 295.2k; active 3.3k; cache 291.8k/99%; p≈2.8ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 79


What other viewers can we try?


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 295.2k; active 3.3k; cache 291.8k/99%; p≈2.8ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 79


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 295.2k; active 3.3k; cache 291.8k/99%; p≈2.8ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 79


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.8s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 295.2k; active 3.3k; cache 291.8k/99%; p≈2.8ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 79


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.2s
Time: overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.9ktok/11.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 295.2k; active 3.3k; cache 291.8k/99%; p≈2.8ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 79


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP load session start (1.3s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 295.2k; active 3.3k; cache 291.8k/99%; p≈2.8ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 79
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP replay drain done (4.6s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 295.2k; active 3.3k; cache 291.8k/99%; p≈2.8ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 80
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 6.8s
Time: model 5.0s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.9ktok/11.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 295.2k; active 3.3k; cache 291.8k/99%; p≈2.8ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 80


📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Waiting for first model/tool update…


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP prompt started (4.6s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 295.2k; active 3.3k; cache 291.8k/99%; p≈2.8ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 80
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first session update (5.6s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 295.2k; active 3.3k; cache 291.8k/99%; p≈2.8ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 80
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first visible text (5.6s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 295.2k; active 3.3k; cache 291.8k/99%; p≈2.8ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 80
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 12.8s
Time: model 11.0s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.9ktok/11.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 295.2k; active 3.3k; cache 291.8k/99%; p≈2.8ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 80


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 295.2k; active 3.3k; cache 291.8k/99%; p≈2.8ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 80
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Best


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Best next things to try:

- **DiffyViewer**
  - strongest explicit mobile signal
  - browser-based patch viewer
  - likely easiest if we can just feed it unified diffs


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 18.8s
Time: model 17.0s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.9ktok/11.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 295.2k; active 3.3k; cache 291.8k/99%; p≈2.8ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 80


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Best next things to try:

- **DiffyViewer**
  - strongest explicit mobile signal
  - browser-based patch viewer
  - likely easiest if we can just feed it unified diffs

- **git-diff**
  - local browser UI
  - simpler than a full review system
  - worth testing if you want “open repo diff in browser” with less workflow weight

- **DiffDeck**


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 24.7s
Time: model 23.0s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.9ktok/11.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 295.2k; active 3.3k; cache 291.8k/99%; p≈2.8ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 80


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Best next things to try:

- **DiffyViewer**
  - strongest explicit mobile signal
  - browser-based patch viewer
  - likely easiest if we can just feed it unified diffs

- **git-diff**
  - local browser UI
  - simpler than a full review system
  - worth testing if you want “open repo diff in browser” with less workflow weight

- **DiffDeck**
  - lightweight browser diff UI
  - less mature/proven, but small enough to try quickly

- **plain webdiff** (`danvk/webdiff` / packaged as `webdiff`)
  - older/or


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Best next things to try:

- **DiffyViewer**
  - strongest explicit mobile signal
  - browser-based patch viewer
  - likely easiest if we can just feed it unified diffs

- **git-diff**
  - local browser UI
  - simpler than a full review system
  - worth testing if you want “open repo diff in browser” with less workflow weight

- **DiffDeck**
  - lightweight browser diff UI
  - less mature/proven, but small enough to try quickly

- **plain webdiff** (`danvk/webdiff` / packaged as `webdiff`)
  - older/original project
  - maybe easier to install than the `git-webdiff` fork
  - weaker workflow than the fork, but could still be enough

What I would **not** try next for this use case


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 30.7s
Time: model 29.0s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.9ktok/11.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 295.2k; active 3.3k; cache 291.8k/99%; p≈2.8ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 80


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Best next things to try:

- **DiffyViewer**
  - strongest explicit mobile signal
  - browser-based patch viewer
  - likely easiest if we can just feed it unified diffs

- **git-diff**
  - local browser UI
  - simpler than a full review system
  - worth testing if you want “open repo diff in browser” with less workflow weight

- **DiffDeck**
  - lightweight browser diff UI
  - less mature/proven, but small enough to try quickly

- **plain webdiff** (`danvk/webdiff` / packaged as `webdiff`)
  - older/original project
  - maybe easier to install than the `git-webdiff` fork
  - weaker workflow than the fork, but could still be enough

What I would **not** try next for this use case:
- **Review Board**
- **Gerrit**
- **Forgejo PR flow**

Too heavy for “show me the patch before I approve.”

So my actual recommendation order is:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 36.9s
Time: model 35.1s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.9ktok/11.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 295.2k; active 3.3k; cache 291.8k/99%; p≈2.8ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 80


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Best next things to try:

- **DiffyViewer**
  - strongest explicit mobile signal
  - browser-based patch viewer
  - likely easiest if we can just feed it unified diffs

- **git-diff**
  - local browser UI
  - simpler than a full review system
  - worth testing if you want “open repo diff in browser” with less workflow weight

- **DiffDeck**
  - lightweight browser diff UI
  - less mature/proven, but small enough to try quickly

- **plain webdiff** (`danvk/webdiff` / packaged as `webdiff`)
  - older/original project
  - maybe easier to install than the `git-webdiff` fork
  - weaker workflow than the fork, but could still be enough

What I would **not** try next for this use case:
- **Review Board**
- **Gerrit**
- **Forgejo PR flow**

Too heavy for “show me the patch before I approve.”

So my actual recommendation order is:

1. **DiffyViewer**
2. **plain webdiff**
3. **git-diff**
4. **DiffDeck**

Why this order:
- first test the most likely **easy + mobile-readable


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Best next things to try:

- **DiffyViewer**
  - strongest explicit mobile signal
  - browser-based patch viewer
  - likely easiest if we can just feed it unified diffs

- **git-diff**
  - local browser UI
  - simpler than a full review system
  - worth testing if you want “open repo diff in browser” with less workflow weight

- **DiffDeck**
  - lightweight browser diff UI
  - less mature/proven, but small enough to try quickly

- **plain webdiff** (`danvk/webdiff` / packaged as `webdiff`)
  - older/original project
  - maybe easier to install than the `git-webdiff` fork
  - weaker workflow than the fork, but could still be enough

What I would **not** try next for this use case:
- **Review Board**
- **Gerrit**
- **Forgejo PR flow**

Too heavy for “show me the patch before I approve.”

So my actual recommendation order is:

1. **DiffyViewer**
2. **plain webdiff**
3. **git-diff**
4. **DiffDeck**

Why this order:
- first test the most likely **easy + mobile-readable**
- then test the most likely **boring but usable**
- only then the more niche tools

If you want, I can next do a sharper pass and rank them by:
- install friction
- local/self-hosted simplicity


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 43.0s
Time: model 41.2s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.9ktok/11.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 295.2k; active 3.3k; cache 291.8k/99%; p≈2.8ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 80


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Best next things to try:

- **DiffyViewer**
  - strongest explicit mobile signal
  - browser-based patch viewer
  - likely easiest if we can just feed it unified diffs

- **git-diff**
  - local browser UI
  - simpler than a full review system
  - worth testing if you want “open repo diff in browser” with less workflow weight

- **DiffDeck**
  - lightweight browser diff UI
  - less mature/proven, but small enough to try quickly

- **plain webdiff** (`danvk/webdiff` / packaged as `webdiff`)
  - older/original project
  - maybe easier to install than the `git-webdiff` fork
  - weaker workflow than the fork, but could still be enough

What I would **not** try next for this use case:
- **Review Board**
- **Gerrit**
- **Forgejo PR flow**

Too heavy for “show me the patch before I approve.”

So my actual recommendation order is:

1. **DiffyViewer**
2. **plain webdiff**
3. **git-diff**
4. **DiffDeck**

Why this order:
- first test the most likely **easy + mobile-readable**
- then test the most likely **boring but usable**
- only then the more niche tools

If you want, I can next do a sharper pass and rank them by:
- install friction
- local/self-hosted simplicity
- mobile friendliness
- suitability for embedding into an approval link


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 44.0s
Time: model 42.2s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 291.1k o 317 cache 6.7k/2% est $0.7325; p≈2.9ktok/11.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 295.2k; active 3.3k; cache 291.8k/99%; p≈2.8ktok; ctx 27.7%; usable 31.5%; observed turns 49; actual turns 80