* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (12):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_Pbxda6RVEqbzBuNibiSrlU3
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_d7Q3mBSMR9ImushzdnTdUMD
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_vtzMTL6ZKDHhnK2NFVcOLro
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_vge6fM20UGWWW4pDfk46xP7
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_9zGXtbF4ow98XpkgxtMAsNi
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_HS9RDVsTl7IZb06hiWWlNWm
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_lQO3fRkWWAaT5jf5UHTiusB
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_jOftINciJ5lJ4CUakroFijN
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_Nx6J1RiotU4L9ck1IiuSGbt
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_CcJGVslquygtjiQ3Ucw9p5G
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_JWkLczp7GWMVmGTkzQzPWdq
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_LZRJFDdLEpurGx12GcC4qEZ

Draft:
I’m doing a focused re-check of just the core north belt again:
- **Garching**
- **Ismaning**
- **Oberschleißheim**
- **Unterschleißheim**

I’ll look for genuinely new or newly-worthwhile results, not just re-list the stale ones.I’ve refreshed the core four result pages. Now I’m extracting their current listing cards directly so I can tell you what’s actually new or newly worthwhile.Yes — but honestly, **not much genuinely new in the north belt**. Most of it is the same pool we already mined, plus a few weaker additions.

### Garching
Nothing really better than what we already contacted.
What’s there now:
- **106643294** — the already-contacted Walter Dudium one
- **168197243** — already contacted
- **168208543** — still that **Nachvermietung** 87 m² one
- some 1-room or 2.5-room stuff, not better than our current batch

**Verdict:** no clear fresh winner here.

### Ismaning
Still mostly the same:
- **168198096** — already contacted
- **168179881** — 49 m² / 1.225 €, still okay but pricey
- **167796832** — 71 m² / 1.130–1.250 €, but **Nachvermietung**
- **167921620** — older 1.120 € one we had already deprioritized due to late/buyout-ish issues

**Verdict:** only **167796832** is somewhat interesting, but the Nachvermietung issue still makes it second-tier.

### Oberschleißheim
A couple of things, but not super exciting:
- **168331752** — already known, furnished/befristet-ish concerns
- **168010269** — 58 m² / 864–956 €, but **Nachvermietung ab Aug**
- **166141329** — clean but too expensive for your budget
- a few 1-room or furnished things

**Verdict:** nothing clearly better than what we already did.

### Unterschleißheim
This had the most actual movement, but again most good ones are already touched or weaker:
- **168326495** — already contacted
- **168196462** — already contacted
- **168424606** — “Ludwig”, still suspicious/low-info
- **167240334** — 61 m² / 1.281 €, maybe possible but pricier
- **161486970** — 60 m² / 1.280 €, older expensive backup


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (12):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_Pbxda6RVEqbzBuNibiSrlU3
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_d7Q3mBSMR9ImushzdnTdUMD
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_vtzMTL6ZKDHhnK2NFVcOLro
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_vge6fM20UGWWW4pDfk46xP7
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_9zGXtbF4ow98XpkgxtMAsNi
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_HS9RDVsTl7IZb06hiWWlNWm
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_lQO3fRkWWAaT5jf5UHTiusB
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_jOftINciJ5lJ4CUakroFijN
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_Nx6J1RiotU4L9ck1IiuSGbt
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_CcJGVslquygtjiQ3Ucw9p5G
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_JWkLczp7GWMVmGTkzQzPWdq
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_LZRJFDdLEpurGx12GcC4qEZ

Draft:
I’m doing a focused re-check of just the core north belt again:
- **Garching**
- **Ismaning**
- **Oberschleißheim**
- **Unterschleißheim**

I’ll look for genuinely new or newly-worthwhile results, not just re-list the stale ones.I’ve refreshed the core four result pages. Now I’m extracting their current listing cards directly so I can tell you what’s actually new or newly worthwhile.Yes — but honestly, **not much genuinely new in the north belt**. Most of it is the same pool we already mined, plus a few weaker additions.

### Garching
Nothing really better than what we already contacted.
What’s there now:
- **106643294** — the already-contacted Walter Dudium one
- **168197243** — already contacted
- **168208543** — still that **Nachvermietung** 87 m² one
- some 1-room or 2.5-room stuff, not better than our current batch

**Verdict:** no clear fresh winner here.

### Ismaning
Still mostly the same:
- **168198096** — already contacted
- **168179881** — 49 m² / 1.225 €, still okay but pricey
- **167796832** — 71 m² / 1.130–1.250 €, but **Nachvermietung**
- **167921620** — older 1.120 € one we had already deprioritized due to late/buyout-ish issues

**Verdict:** only **167796832** is somewhat interesting, but the Nachvermietung issue still makes it second-tier.

### Oberschleißheim
A couple of things, but not super exciting:
- **168331752** — already known, furnished/befristet-ish concerns
- **168010269** — 58 m² / 864–956 €, but **Nachvermietung ab Aug**
- **166141329** — clean but too expensive for your budget
- a few 1-room or furnished things

**Verdict:** nothing clearly better than what we already did.

### Unterschleißheim
This had the most actual movement, but again most good ones are already touched or weaker:
- **168326495** — already contacted
- **168196462** — already contacted
- **168424606** — “Ludwig”, still suspicious/low-info
- **167240334** — 61 m² / 1.281 €, maybe possible but pricier
- **161486970** — 60 m² / 1.280 €, older expensive backup
- **167305510** — older 68 m² / 1.145 €, already known, high competition

**Verdict:** maybe **167240334** if we want another stretch candidate, but not a standout.

## Honest summary
If you mean **strictly new and strong in Garching / Ismaning / the Schleißheims**, then:
- **no major new jackpot showed up**
- the only somewhat-live leftovers are mostly:
  - **167796832** (Ismaning, but Nachvermietung)
  - **167240334** (Unterschleißheim, pricier)
  - **161486970** (Unterschleißheim, older/pricier)
  - **168010269


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (18):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_51mP9BcvIZEY5qQ2vrUwmbr
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_knnkPvW9uAV41R7RujZj5cA
- persistent_browser_navigate / completed / call_PBXyqJHbfNTtac7tmtvOlJP
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_N9TWtlfIrwD4SoFHWUML5VF
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_UNW1r1jhqIC1CyYhpfPc0bF
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_5rKeBzs9gtSdLb8ljN2sgyO
- persistent_chat_send_image / completed / /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/unterschleissheim-168326495-captcha.png
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_JCEzkZqKa7bzxpJzuUV9Ra9
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_aFNqIpZVWahslfj4nxxIFXb
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_bkwZ3Nep4pnFQanT6MRFLRB
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_KjI0jUIKvZWGLZYjuj94U2U
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_vK86ZbIROCpuWroMErvopKO
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_WCOrwsJAPK6Tar7Y9aYDU8s
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_vsUeCC844Ntrxay0QELNC3M
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_mgZUIbxOpPtd7OlfViy1X8t
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_tdWJyLgX6WzKPUDJebXIuH9
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_urvAnPce53o5CiU7Lg87WQz
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_yqVBlvLTSHtIAKq5xMy9yn1

Draft:
I’m doing a focused re-check of just the core north belt again:
- **Garching**
- **Ismaning**
- **Oberschleißheim**
- **Unterschleißheim**

I’ll look for genuinely new or newly-worthwhile results, not just re-list the stale ones.I’ve refreshed the core four result pages. Now I’m extracting their current listing cards directly so I can tell you what’s actually new or newly worthwhile.Yes — but honestly, **not much genuinely new in the north belt**. Most of it is the same pool we already mined, plus a few weaker additions.

### Garching
Nothing really better than what we already contacted.
What’s there now:
- **106643294** — the already-contacted Walter Dudium one
- **168197243** — already contacted
- **168208543** — still that **Nachvermietung** 87 m² one
- some 1-room or 2.5-room stuff, not better than our current batch

**Verdict:** no clear fresh winner here.

### Ismaning
Still mostly the same:
- **168198096** — already contacted
- **168179881** — 49 m² / 1.225 €, still okay but pricey
- **167796832** — 71 m² / 1.130–1.250 €, but **Nachvermietung**
- **167921620** — older 1.120 € one we had already deprioritized due to late/buyout-ish issues

**Verdict:** only **167796832** is somewhat interesting, but the Nachvermietung issue still makes it second-tier.

### Oberschleißheim
A couple of things, but not super exciting:
- **168331752** — already known, furnished/befristet-ish concerns
- **168010269** — 58 m² / 864–956 €, but **Nachvermietung ab Aug**
- **166141329** — clean but too expensive for your budget
- a few 1-room or furnished things

**Verdict:** nothing clearly better than what we already did.

### Unterschleißheim
This had the most actual movement, but again most good ones are already touched or weaker:
- **168326495** — already contacted
- **168196462** — already contacted
- **168424606** — “Ludwig”, still suspicious/low-info
- **167240334** — 61 m² / 1.281 €, maybe possible but pricier
- **161486970** — 60 m² / 1.280 €, older expensive backup
- **167305510** — older 68 m² / 1.145 €, already known, high competition

**Verdict:** maybe **167240334** if we want another stretch candidate, but not a standout.

## Honest summary
If you mean **strictly new and strong in Garching / Ismaning / the Schleißheims**, then:
- **no major new jackpot showed up**
- the only somewhat-live leftovers are mostly:
  - **167796832** (Ismaning, but Nachvermietung)
  - **167240334** (Unterschleißheim, pricier)
  - **161486970** (Unterschleißheim, older/pricier)


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 72.7s
Time: model 69.4s, overhead 2.0s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: i 13.3k o 724 cache 295.9k/96% est $0.0441; p≈2.4ktok/9.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 288.4k; active 1.7k; cache 286.7k/100%; p≈1.9ktok; ctx 27.5%; usable 28.0%; observed turns 324


I’m doing a focused re-check of just the core north belt again:
- **Garching**
- **Ismaning**
- **Oberschleißheim**
- **Unterschleißheim**

I’ll look for genuinely new or newly-worthwhile results, not just re-list the stale ones.I’ve refreshed the core four result pages. Now I’m extracting their current listing cards directly so I can tell you what’s actually new or newly worthwhile.Yes — but honestly, **not much genuinely new in the north belt**. Most of it is the same pool we already mined, plus a few weaker additions.

### Garching
Nothing really better than what we already contacted.
What’s there now:
- **106643294** — the already-contacted Walter Dudium one
- **168197243** — already contacted
- **168208543** — still that **Nachvermietung** 87 m² one
- some 1-room or 2.5-room stuff, not better than our current batch

**Verdict:** no clear fresh winner here.

### Ismaning
Still mostly the same:
- **168198096** — already contacted
- **168179881** — 49 m² / 1.225 €, still okay but pricey
- **167796832** — 71 m² / 1.130–1.250 €, but **Nachvermietung**
- **167921620** — older 1.120 € one we had already deprioritized due to late/buyout-ish issues

**Verdict:** only **167796832** is somewhat interesting, but the Nachvermietung issue still makes it second-tier.

### Oberschleißheim
A couple of things, but not super exciting:
- **168331752** — already known, furnished/befristet-ish concerns
- **168010269** — 58 m² / 864–956 €, but **Nachvermietung ab Aug**
- **166141329** — clean but too expensive for your budget
- a few 1-room or furnished things

**Verdict:** nothing clearly better than what we already did.

### Unterschleißheim
This had the most actual movement, but again most good ones are already touched or weaker:
- **168326495** — already contacted
- **168196462** — already contacted
- **168424606** — “Ludwig”, still suspicious/low-info
- **167240334** — 61 m² / 1.281 €, maybe possible but pricier
- **161486970** — 60 m² / 1.280 €, older expensive backup
- **167305510** — older 68 m² / 1.145 €, already known, high competition

**Verdict:** maybe **167240334** if we want another stretch candidate, but not a standout.

## Honest summary
If you mean **strictly new and strong in Garching / Ismaning / the Schleißheims**, then:
- **no major new jackpot showed up**
- the only somewhat-live leftovers are mostly:
  - **167796832** (Ismaning, but Nachvermietung)
  - **167240334** (Unterschleißheim, pricier)
  - **161486970** (Unterschleißheim, older/pricier)
  - **168010269** (Oberschleißheim, Nachvermietung)

So the **best truly remaining candidates right now are actually outside that inner north-core**, like:
- **168398031** — Neufahrn
- **168252005** — Eching

If you want, I can do either:
1. **stay strict** and try the best remaining north-belt leftovers, or
2. **be pragmatic** and move to **Neufahrn/Eching** because the core area is getting exhausted again.


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 74.3s
Time: model 69.4s, overhead 4.9s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: i 13.3k o 724 cache 295.9k/96% est $0.0441; p≈2.4ktok/9.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 310.0k; active 14.0k; cache 295.9k/96%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 29.6%; usable 30.1%; guard stale 288.4k; observed turns 324


Did anyone reply?


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Ctx: direct ACP session 310.0k; active 14.0k; cache 295.9k/96%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 29.6%; usable 30.1%; epoch turns 39; lifetime turns 325; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.1s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Ctx: direct ACP session 310.0k; active 14.0k; cache 295.9k/96%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 29.6%; usable 30.1%; epoch turns 39; lifetime turns 325; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.7s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Ctx: direct ACP session 310.0k; active 14.0k; cache 295.9k/96%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 29.6%; usable 30.1%; epoch turns 39; lifetime turns 325; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 3.2s
Time: overhead 3.2s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈2.3ktok/9.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 310.0k; active 14.0k; cache 295.9k/96%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 29.6%; usable 30.1%; epoch turns 39; lifetime turns 325; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Waiting for first model/tool update…


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
I


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (1):
- persistent_browser_navigate / completed / call_fwUzbjePA1jSQtKOA19Xp4J

Draft:
I’m checking the real ImmoScout inbox now for any new replies since the batch we sent yesterday.That


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (2):
- persistent_browser_navigate / completed / call_fwUzbjePA1jSQtKOA19Xp4J
- persistent_browser_start / completed / call_P4U3N0MHrjVToqyq8CD49zt

Draft:
I’m checking the real ImmoScout inbox now for any new replies since the batch we sent yesterday.That browser session expired, so I’m starting a fresh one and going straight to the inbox.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (2):
- persistent_browser_navigate / completed / call_fwUzbjePA1jSQtKOA19Xp4J
- persistent_browser_start / completed / call_P4U3N0MHrjVToqyq8CD49zt

Draft:
I’m checking the real ImmoScout inbox now for any new replies since the batch we sent yesterday.That browser session expired, so I’m starting a fresh one and going straight to the inbox.Fresh


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (3):
- persistent_browser_navigate / completed / call_fwUzbjePA1jSQtKOA19Xp4J
- persistent_browser_start / completed / call_P4U3N0MHrjVToqyq8CD49zt
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_TuGbWmkUjUTzg8NqqSmwWQs

Draft:
I’m checking the real ImmoScout inbox now for any new replies since the batch we sent yesterday.That browser session expired, so I’m starting a fresh one and going straight to the inbox.Fresh session is up; it landed on the normal ImmoScout login page for the inbox. I’m logging in and then I’ll inspect the latest conversations for real replies.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (3):
- persistent_browser_navigate / completed / call_fwUzbjePA1jSQtKOA19Xp4J
- persistent_browser_start / completed / call_P4U3N0MHrjVToqyq8CD49zt
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_TuGbWmkUjUTzg8NqqSmwWQs

Draft:
I’m checking the real ImmoScout inbox now for any new replies since the batch we sent yesterday.That browser session expired, so I’m starting a fresh one and going straight to the inbox.Fresh session is up; it landed on the normal ImmoScout login page for the inbox. I’m logging in and then I’ll inspect the latest conversations for real replies.The


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 66.8s
Time: model 61.7s, overhead 3.2s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈2.3ktok/9.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 310.0k; active 14.0k; cache 295.9k/96%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 29.6%; usable 30.1%; epoch turns 39; lifetime turns 325; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (4):
- persistent_browser_navigate / completed / call_fwUzbjePA1jSQtKOA19Xp4J
- persistent_browser_start / completed / call_P4U3N0MHrjVToqyq8CD49zt
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_TuGbWmkUjUTzg8NqqSmwWQs
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_f9z9dFqRkOYLyygCABGDejV

Draft:
I’m checking the real ImmoScout inbox now for any new replies since the batch we sent yesterday.That browser session expired, so I’m starting a fresh one and going straight to the inbox.Fresh session is up; it landed on the normal ImmoScout login page for the inbox. I’m logging in and then I’ll inspect the latest conversations for real replies.The login page changed shape a bit, so I’m grabbing the live page state and using the actual visible controls rather than guessing the field.Cookie


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (6):
- persistent_browser_navigate / completed / call_fwUzbjePA1jSQtKOA19Xp4J
- persistent_browser_start / completed / call_P4U3N0MHrjVToqyq8CD49zt
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_TuGbWmkUjUTzg8NqqSmwWQs
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_f9z9dFqRkOYLyygCABGDejV
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_W15D7KSGGaFRXsi0oADjts3
- persistent_browser_call / pending / call_ylKcznJSJGVMGlB09O3Cu9Q

Draft:
I’m checking the real ImmoScout inbox now for any new replies since the batch we sent yesterday.That browser session expired, so I’m starting a fresh one and going straight to the inbox.Fresh session is up; it landed on the normal ImmoScout login page for the inbox. I’m logging in and then I’ll inspect the latest conversations for real replies.The login page changed shape a bit, so I’m grabbing the live page state and using the actual visible controls rather than guessing the field.Cookie dialog is still on top in this fresh inbox session. I’m accepting it, logging in, and then I’ll check for real replies.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (7):
- persistent_browser_navigate / completed / call_fwUzbjePA1jSQtKOA19Xp4J
- persistent_browser_start / completed / call_P4U3N0MHrjVToqyq8CD49zt
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_TuGbWmkUjUTzg8NqqSmwWQs
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_f9z9dFqRkOYLyygCABGDejV
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_W15D7KSGGaFRXsi0oADjts3
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_ylKcznJSJGVMGlB09O3Cu9Q
- persistent_browser_snapshot / pending / call_P8rTCUF7mlcFTVlMuvnCa5d

Draft:
I’m checking the real ImmoScout inbox now for any new replies since the batch we sent yesterday.That browser session expired, so I’m starting a fresh one and going straight to the inbox.Fresh session is up; it landed on the normal ImmoScout login page for the inbox. I’m logging in and then I’ll inspect the latest conversations for real replies.The login page changed shape a bit, so I’m grabbing the live page state and using the actual visible controls rather than guessing the field.Cookie dialog is still on top in this fresh inbox session. I’m accepting it, logging in, and then I’ll check for real replies.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (7):
- persistent_browser_navigate / completed / call_fwUzbjePA1jSQtKOA19Xp4J
- persistent_browser_start / completed / call_P4U3N0MHrjVToqyq8CD49zt
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_TuGbWmkUjUTzg8NqqSmwWQs
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_f9z9dFqRkOYLyygCABGDejV
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_W15D7KSGGaFRXsi0oADjts3
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_ylKcznJSJGVMGlB09O3Cu9Q
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_P8rTCUF7mlcFTVlMuvnCa5d

Draft:
I’m checking the real ImmoScout inbox now for any new replies since the batch we sent yesterday.That browser session expired, so I’m starting a fresh one and going straight to the inbox.Fresh session is up; it landed on the normal ImmoScout login page for the inbox. I’m logging in and then I’ll inspect the latest conversations for real replies.The login page changed shape a bit, so I’m grabbing the live page state and using the actual visible controls rather than guessing the field.Cookie dialog is still on top in this fresh inbox session. I’m accepting it, logging in, and then I’ll check for real replies.I


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (9):
- persistent_browser_navigate / completed / call_fwUzbjePA1jSQtKOA19Xp4J
- persistent_browser_start / completed / call_P4U3N0MHrjVToqyq8CD49zt
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_TuGbWmkUjUTzg8NqqSmwWQs
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_f9z9dFqRkOYLyygCABGDejV
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_W15D7KSGGaFRXsi0oADjts3
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_ylKcznJSJGVMGlB09O3Cu9Q
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_P8rTCUF7mlcFTVlMuvnCa5d
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_d3F8QaHtB9nM4dDxoaKSuVQ
- persistent_browser_call / pending / call_IiPnsdQNQ0MbieCJKEJbh1E

Draft:
I’m checking the real ImmoScout inbox now for any new replies since the batch we sent yesterday.That browser session expired, so I’m starting a fresh one and going straight to the inbox.Fresh session is up; it landed on the normal ImmoScout login page for the inbox. I’m logging in and then I’ll inspect the latest conversations for real replies.The login page changed shape a bit, so I’m grabbing the live page state and using the actual visible controls rather than guessing the field.Cookie dialog is still on top in this fresh inbox session. I’m accepting it, logging in, and then I’ll check for real replies.I’m on the password step now. After this I can inspect the real inbox and see if anybody answered.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (9):
- persistent_browser_navigate / completed / call_fwUzbjePA1jSQtKOA19Xp4J
- persistent_browser_start / completed / call_P4U3N0MHrjVToqyq8CD49zt
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_TuGbWmkUjUTzg8NqqSmwWQs
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_f9z9dFqRkOYLyygCABGDejV
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_W15D7KSGGaFRXsi0oADjts3
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_ylKcznJSJGVMGlB09O3Cu9Q
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_P8rTCUF7mlcFTVlMuvnCa5d
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_d3F8QaHtB9nM4dDxoaKSuVQ
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_IiPnsdQNQ0MbieCJKEJbh1E

Draft:
I’m checking the real ImmoScout inbox now for any new replies since the batch we sent yesterday.That browser session expired, so I’m starting a fresh one and going straight to the inbox.Fresh session is up; it landed on the normal ImmoScout login page for the inbox. I’m logging in and then I’ll inspect the latest conversations for real replies.The login page changed shape a bit, so I’m grabbing the live page state and using the actual visible controls rather than guessing the field.Cookie dialog is still on top in this fresh inbox session. I’m accepting it, logging in, and then I’ll check for real replies.I’m on the password step now. After this I can inspect the real inbox and see if anybody answered.Logged


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (10):
- persistent_browser_navigate / completed / call_fwUzbjePA1jSQtKOA19Xp4J
- persistent_browser_start / completed / call_P4U3N0MHrjVToqyq8CD49zt
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_TuGbWmkUjUTzg8NqqSmwWQs
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_f9z9dFqRkOYLyygCABGDejV
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_W15D7KSGGaFRXsi0oADjts3
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_ylKcznJSJGVMGlB09O3Cu9Q
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_P8rTCUF7mlcFTVlMuvnCa5d
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_d3F8QaHtB9nM4dDxoaKSuVQ
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_IiPnsdQNQ0MbieCJKEJbh1E
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_44rAcaiRoWehTW4lmTHZrgb

Draft:
I’m checking the real ImmoScout inbox now for any new replies since the batch we sent yesterday.That browser session expired, so I’m starting a fresh one and going straight to the inbox.Fresh session is up; it landed on the normal ImmoScout login page for the inbox. I’m logging in and then I’ll inspect the latest conversations for real replies.The login page changed shape a bit, so I’m grabbing the live page state and using the actual visible controls rather than guessing the field.Cookie dialog is still on top in this fresh inbox session. I’m accepting it, logging in, and then I’ll check for real replies.I’m on the password step now. After this I can inspect the real inbox and see if anybody answered.Logged back in successfully. I’m now checking the latest conversation list for any inbound replies from the people we contacted yesterday/today.Yes


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 129.7s
Time: model 124.5s, overhead 3.2s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈2.3ktok/9.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 310.0k; active 14.0k; cache 295.9k/96%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 29.6%; usable 30.1%; epoch turns 39; lifetime turns 325; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (10):
- persistent_browser_navigate / completed / call_fwUzbjePA1jSQtKOA19Xp4J
- persistent_browser_start / completed / call_P4U3N0MHrjVToqyq8CD49zt
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_TuGbWmkUjUTzg8NqqSmwWQs
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_f9z9dFqRkOYLyygCABGDejV
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_W15D7KSGGaFRXsi0oADjts3
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_ylKcznJSJGVMGlB09O3Cu9Q
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_P8rTCUF7mlcFTVlMuvnCa5d
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_d3F8QaHtB9nM4dDxoaKSuVQ
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_IiPnsdQNQ0MbieCJKEJbh1E
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_44rAcaiRoWehTW4lmTHZrgb

Draft:
I’m checking the real ImmoScout inbox now for any new replies since the batch we sent yesterday.That browser session expired, so I’m starting a fresh one and going straight to the inbox.Fresh session is up; it landed on the normal ImmoScout login page for the inbox. I’m logging in and then I’ll inspect the latest conversations for real replies.The login page changed shape a bit, so I’m grabbing the live page state and using the actual visible controls rather than guessing the field.Cookie dialog is still on top in this fresh inbox session. I’m accepting it, logging in, and then I’ll check for real replies.I’m on the password step now. After this I can inspect the real inbox and see if anybody answered.Logged back in successfully. I’m now checking the latest conversation list for any inbound replies from the people we contacted yesterday/today.Yes — there are **2 real replies** in the fresh batch:

1. **Walter Dudium — Garching**
- **Invitation to viewing**
- **Sat, 13.06.26 at 10:00**
- Address: **Auweg 8, 85748 Garching**
- He asks to bring/send:
  - Mieterselbstauskunft
  - Einkommensnachweise
  - SCHUFA-Auskunft

2. **Michael Sachse — Unterschleißheim**
- **Rejection**
- “Objekt anderweitig vergeben”

Everything else from yesterday’s batch still looks like just your outgoing messages, with **no reply yet**.

So the actual status is:
- **1 positive reply / viewing invitation**
- **1 rejection**
- **rest still pending**

If you want, I can next help you prepare the reply/acceptance for the **Walter Dudium** viewing and make a compact document checklist.


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 134.2s
Time: model 129.0s, overhead 3.2s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: i 6.0k o 204 t 27 cache 282.6k/98% est $0.0186; p≈2.3ktok/9.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 310.0k; active 14.0k; cache 295.9k/96%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 29.6%; usable 30.1%; epoch turns 39; lifetime turns 325; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


I’m checking the real ImmoScout inbox now for any new replies since the batch we sent yesterday.That browser session expired, so I’m starting a fresh one and going straight to the inbox.Fresh session is up; it landed on the normal ImmoScout login page for the inbox. I’m logging in and then I’ll inspect the latest conversations for real replies.The login page changed shape a bit, so I’m grabbing the live page state and using the actual visible controls rather than guessing the field.Cookie dialog is still on top in this fresh inbox session. I’m accepting it, logging in, and then I’ll check for real replies.I’m on the password step now. After this I can inspect the real inbox and see if anybody answered.Logged back in successfully. I’m now checking the latest conversation list for any inbound replies from the people we contacted yesterday/today.Yes — there are **2 real replies** in the fresh batch:

1. **Walter Dudium — Garching**
- **Invitation to viewing**
- **Sat, 13.06.26 at 10:00**
- Address: **Auweg 8, 85748 Garching**
- He asks to bring/send:
  - Mieterselbstauskunft
  - Einkommensnachweise
  - SCHUFA-Auskunft

2. **Michael Sachse — Unterschleißheim**
- **Rejection**
- “Objekt anderweitig vergeben”

Everything else from yesterday’s batch still looks like just your outgoing messages, with **no reply yet**.

So the actual status is:
- **1 positive reply / viewing invitation**
- **1 rejection**
- **rest still pending**

If you want, I can next help you prepare the reply/acceptance for the **Walter Dudium** viewing and make a compact document checklist.


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 136.3s
Time: model 129.0s, overhead 7.2s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: i 6.0k o 204 t 27 cache 282.6k/98% est $0.0186; p≈2.3ktok/9.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 288.9k; active 6.3k; cache 282.6k/98%; p≈2.3ktok; ctx 27.6%; usable 28.1%; guard stale 310.0k; epoch turns 39; lifetime turns 325; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


Great thank you I sent the auto-reply there. It's a nice enough flat to view but he will have many applicants


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Ctx: direct ACP session 288.9k; active 6.3k; cache 282.6k/98%; p≈2.3ktok; ctx 27.6%; usable 28.1%; epoch turns 40; lifetime turns 326; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.1s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Ctx: direct ACP session 288.9k; active 6.3k; cache 282.6k/98%; p≈2.3ktok; ctx 27.6%; usable 28.1%; epoch turns 40; lifetime turns 326; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 2.6s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Ctx: direct ACP session 288.9k; active 6.3k; cache 282.6k/98%; p≈2.3ktok; ctx 27.6%; usable 28.1%; epoch turns 40; lifetime turns 326; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 4.5s
Time: overhead 4.5s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈3.6ktok/14.5kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 288.9k; active 6.3k; cache 282.6k/98%; p≈2.3ktok; ctx 27.6%; usable 28.1%; epoch turns 40; lifetime turns 326; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Waiting for first model/tool update…


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Yeah


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (1):
- persistent_browser_call / pending / call_6S5LRzPOSjIiB4FWEZDJw2s

Draft:
Yeah, likely many applicants — but a viewing is still a real opening, and that’s already better than the silent majority of these.

For now I’d treat it as:
- **worth viewing**
- **not worth emotionally overcommitting**
- just keep the pipeline moving in parallel

That’s the right mindset here:
- go to the viewing
- bring the requested docs
- stay polite and sharp
- but keep sending more applications because this one is not secure yet

Also good that you already sent the auto-reply — one less thing hanging.

When you want, I can:
1. keep searching/sending the next wave, or
2. help prepare a compact **viewing packet checklist** for Dudium.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (18):
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_tjTSw1nQLEFfTt9kAWpQL9d
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_HYeqCYi4ZBvqMHapiOdOEO8
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_Qb7UJ58eXNT3rA3bdw9GJqW
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_B7lu4L14dSJQwWsynqK9Oe6
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_1ROTyFF4UakQFkNCO43W4qF
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_paCMCzSIizpyLrz8aT0qDoG
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_AQAYjCyiquYcwGKWH5hWqMX
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_S5jQsjjoLIklY5ltDFlHD2E
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_RQbJYm3eDHOrHwCFUpArCPM
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_smMwDfXVdjPBcV8pXZnRfZM
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_vjtojFS6jh0S48Wrcg2HMUU
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_pCv0gvX0ejRapripqud5bEl
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_Tdt8i68Oh0g6QWG6ZkzInxJ
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_BIdQZ4JB4QmBnEMieHKkK4R
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_RYcly9DfwlAMeqe0BUtyzAb
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_X5m1v8Vz0B8LwhpUGkTQeWw
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_V1lm6NFWefslKvUfzn7c9gd
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_4e5Nrl6oiFKfEPuGroGTBrL

Draft:
Yeah, likely many applicants — but a viewing is still a real opening, and that’s already better than the silent majority of these.

For now I’d treat it as:
- **worth viewing**
- **not worth emotionally overcommitting**
- just keep the pipeline moving in parallel

That’s the right mindset here:
- go to the viewing
- bring the requested docs
- stay polite and sharp
- but keep sending more applications because this one is not secure yet

Also good that you already sent the auto-reply — one less thing hanging.

When you want, I can:
1. keep searching/sending the next wave, or
2. help prepare a compact **viewing packet checklist** for Dudium.


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 17.1s
Time: model 10.5s, overhead 4.5s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: i 17.5k o 152 cache 275.5k/94% est $0.0461; p≈3.6ktok/14.5kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 288.9k; active 6.3k; cache 282.6k/98%; p≈2.3ktok; ctx 27.6%; usable 28.1%; epoch turns 40; lifetime turns 326; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


Yeah, likely many applicants — but a viewing is still a real opening, and that’s already better than the silent majority of these.

For now I’d treat it as:
- **worth viewing**
- **not worth emotionally overcommitting**
- just keep the pipeline moving in parallel

That’s the right mindset here:
- go to the viewing
- bring the requested docs
- stay polite and sharp
- but keep sending more applications because this one is not secure yet

Also good that you already sent the auto-reply — one less thing hanging.

When you want, I can:
1. keep searching/sending the next wave, or
2. help prepare a compact **viewing packet checklist** for Dudium.


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 19.0s
Time: model 10.5s, overhead 8.5s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: i 17.5k o 152 cache 275.5k/94% est $0.0461; p≈3.6ktok/14.5kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 293.1k; active 17.7k; cache 275.5k/94%; p≈3.6ktok; ctx 27.6%; usable 28.1%; epoch turns 40; lifetime turns 326; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


Please search for more in our first priority areas, the new ones may appear make sure to refresh, we have premium so should see them sooner


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Ctx: direct ACP session 293.1k; active 17.7k; cache 275.5k/94%; p≈3.6ktok; ctx 27.6%; usable 28.1%; epoch turns 40; lifetime turns 326; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.3s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Ctx: direct ACP session 293.1k; active 17.7k; cache 275.5k/94%; p≈3.6ktok; ctx 27.6%; usable 28.1%; epoch turns 40; lifetime turns 326; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 2.2s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Ctx: direct ACP session 293.1k; active 17.7k; cache 275.5k/94%; p≈3.6ktok; ctx 27.6%; usable 28.1%; epoch turns 40; lifetime turns 326; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 3.7s
Time: overhead 3.7s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈2.7ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 293.1k; active 17.7k; cache 275.5k/94%; p≈3.6ktok; ctx 27.6%; usable 28.1%; epoch turns 40; lifetime turns 326; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
I


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (1):
- persistent_browser_call / pending / call_oP2728W6ccZFb8AsZmXRCrD

Draft:
I’m doing a premium-first refresh sweep of the **top priority areas only** now:
- Garching
- Ismaning
- Oberschleißheim
- Unterschleißheim

I’ll force-refresh the live result pages and look for **new private/exclusive listings** that weren’t worth contacting before.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (4):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_oP2728W6ccZFb8AsZmXRCrD
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_PArzdgegdYwhRDcadLimhgk
- persistent_browser_call / in_progress / call_u1WeoEt4LsANGjrMlKVk2HY
- persistent_browser_call / in_progress / call_2t8M3iraCaJk7R67GtBX5W1

Draft:
I’m doing a premium-first refresh sweep of the **top priority areas only** now:
- Garching
- Ismaning
- Oberschleißheim
- Unterschleißheim

I’ll force-refresh the live result pages and look for **new private/exclusive listings** that weren’t worth contacting before.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (4):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_oP2728W6ccZFb8AsZmXRCrD
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_PArzdgegdYwhRDcadLimhgk
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_u1WeoEt4LsANGjrMlKVk2HY
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_2t8M3iraCaJk7R67GtBX5W1

Draft:
I’m doing a premium-first refresh sweep of the **top priority areas only** now:
- Garching
- Ismaning
- Oberschleißheim
- Unterschleißheim

I’ll force-refresh the live result pages and look for **new private/exclusive listings** that weren’t worth contacting before.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (4):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_oP2728W6ccZFb8AsZmXRCrD
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_PArzdgegdYwhRDcadLimhgk
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_u1WeoEt4LsANGjrMlKVk2HY
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_2t8M3iraCaJk7R67GtBX5W1

Draft:
I’m doing a premium-first refresh sweep of the **top priority areas only** now:
- Garching
- Ismaning
- Oberschleißheim
- Unterschleißheim

I’ll force-refresh the live result pages and look for **new private/exclusive listings** that weren’t worth contacting before.The


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (5):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_oP2728W6ccZFb8AsZmXRCrD
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_PArzdgegdYwhRDcadLimhgk
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_u1WeoEt4LsANGjrMlKVk2HY
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_2t8M3iraCaJk7R67GtBX5W1
- persistent_browser_call / pending / call_1pGDm1rb4eDWmjhUveyi6jQ

Draft:
I’m doing a premium-first refresh sweep of the **top priority areas only** now:
- Garching
- Ismaning
- Oberschleißheim
- Unterschleißheim

I’ll force-refresh the live result pages and look for **new private/exclusive listings** that weren’t worth contacting before.The premium refresh worked; I’ve got all four live result pages reloaded. Now I’m pulling just the listing cards from each one so I can spot actual new additions quickly.


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 68.2s
Time: model 62.4s, overhead 3.7s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈2.7ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 293.1k; active 17.7k; cache 275.5k/94%; p≈3.6ktok; ctx 28.0%; usable 28.5%; epoch turns 41; lifetime turns 327; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (12):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_oP2728W6ccZFb8AsZmXRCrD
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_PArzdgegdYwhRDcadLimhgk
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_u1WeoEt4LsANGjrMlKVk2HY
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_2t8M3iraCaJk7R67GtBX5W1
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_1pGDm1rb4eDWmjhUveyi6jQ
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_7s60JeZPJzZaUouA4pSFwAB
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_qXvkOoI7FnKT1azZ1fbK35q
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_FYVHlbB1x3QvEnTRTPky2hu
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_isfO8K06XgxJg8r88TH45wa
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_UxlBAMRfjQ8gF12sUJCd2qP
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_kkZQJVJb98ybwYaiEKTvh3w
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_fAU617B1VN3pv9oRQusoGWa

Draft:
I’m doing a premium-first refresh sweep of the **top priority areas only** now:
- Garching
- Ismaning
- Oberschleißheim
- Unterschleißheim

I’ll force-refresh the live result pages and look for **new private/exclusive listings** that weren’t worth contacting before.The premium refresh worked; I’ve got all four live result pages reloaded. Now I’m pulling just the listing cards from each one so I can spot actual new additions quickly.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (12):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_oP2728W6ccZFb8AsZmXRCrD
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_PArzdgegdYwhRDcadLimhgk
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_u1WeoEt4LsANGjrMlKVk2HY
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_2t8M3iraCaJk7R67GtBX5W1
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_1pGDm1rb4eDWmjhUveyi6jQ
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_7s60JeZPJzZaUouA4pSFwAB
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_qXvkOoI7FnKT1azZ1fbK35q
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_FYVHlbB1x3QvEnTRTPky2hu
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_isfO8K06XgxJg8r88TH45wa
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_UxlBAMRfjQ8gF12sUJCd2qP
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_kkZQJVJb98ybwYaiEKTvh3w
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_fAU617B1VN3pv9oRQusoGWa

Draft:
I’m doing a premium-first refresh sweep of the **top priority areas only** now:
- Garching
- Ismaning
- Oberschleißheim
- Unterschleißheim

I’ll force-refresh the live result pages and look for **new private/exclusive listings** that weren’t worth contacting before.The premium refresh worked; I’ve got all four live result pages reloaded. Now I’m pulling just the listing cards from each one so I can spot actual new additions quickly.I refreshed all four priority areas with the premium view.

Short answer: **not much new and strong**, but there are a **few additions**.

### Actually new / potentially worth a look
**Unterschleißheim**
- **167240334** — 2 Zi, **61 m²**, **1.281 €**
  - still a stretch price-wise, but at least a real 2-room option
- **161486970** — 2 Zi, **60 m²**, **1.280 €**, **EBK**
  - older but still live; also stretch tier
- **168444839** — 2 Zi, **55 m²**, **1.250 €**, **möbliert**
  - only worth it if furnished is truly included and not scammy

**Ismaning**
- not really new-new, but still remaining:
  - **168179881** — 2 Zi, **49 m²**, **1.225 €**
  - **167796832** — 2 Zi, **71 m²**, **1.130–1.250 €**, but **Nachvermietung**

### New but mostly weak / not worth prioritizing


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (12):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_oP2728W6ccZFb8AsZmXRCrD
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_PArzdgegdYwhRDcadLimhgk
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_u1WeoEt4LsANGjrMlKVk2HY
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_2t8M3iraCaJk7R67GtBX5W1
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_1pGDm1rb4eDWmjhUveyi6jQ
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_7s60JeZPJzZaUouA4pSFwAB
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_qXvkOoI7FnKT1azZ1fbK35q
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_FYVHlbB1x3QvEnTRTPky2hu
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_isfO8K06XgxJg8r88TH45wa
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_UxlBAMRfjQ8gF12sUJCd2qP
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_kkZQJVJb98ybwYaiEKTvh3w
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_fAU617B1VN3pv9oRQusoGWa

Draft:
I’m doing a premium-first refresh sweep of the **top priority areas only** now:
- Garching
- Ismaning
- Oberschleißheim
- Unterschleißheim

I’ll force-refresh the live result pages and look for **new private/exclusive listings** that weren’t worth contacting before.The premium refresh worked; I’ve got all four live result pages reloaded. Now I’m pulling just the listing cards from each one so I can spot actual new additions quickly.I refreshed all four priority areas with the premium view.

Short answer: **not much new and strong**, but there are a **few additions**.

### Actually new / potentially worth a look
**Unterschleißheim**
- **167240334** — 2 Zi, **61 m²**, **1.281 €**
  - still a stretch price-wise, but at least a real 2-room option
- **161486970** — 2 Zi, **60 m²**, **1.280 €**, **EBK**
  - older but still live; also stretch tier
- **168444839** — 2 Zi, **55 m²**, **1.250 €**, **möbliert**
  - only worth it if furnished is truly included and not scammy

**Ismaning**
- not really new-new, but still remaining:
  - **168179881** — 2 Zi, **49 m²**, **1.225 €**
  - **167796832** — 2 Zi, **71 m²**, **1.130–1.250 €**, but **Nachvermietung**

### New but mostly weak / not worth prioritizing
**Garching**
- **168478363** — 2 Zi, **56 m²**, **731–809 €**
  - but **Nachvermietung**, so I don’t like it
- otherwise it’s the same pool we already mined

**Oberschleißheim**
- **168404817 / 167953417** — project pages, too broad / noisy
- **168253040** — 2 Zi, **52 m²**, **1.118 €**, but **möbliert**
- **168010269** still there, but **Nachvermietung ab Aug**
- **168331752** still there, but we already disliked it

## My honest verdict
In the **strict first-priority areas**, the only remaining things I’d even consider next are:

1. **167240334** — Unterschleißheim
2. **161486970** — Unterschleißheim
3. **168179881** — Ismaning
4. **168444839** — Unterschleißheim, only if furnished is included and clean
5. **167796832** —


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (12):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_oP2728W6ccZFb8AsZmXRCrD
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_PArzdgegdYwhRDcadLimhgk
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_u1WeoEt4LsANGjrMlKVk2HY
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_2t8M3iraCaJk7R67GtBX5W1
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_1pGDm1rb4eDWmjhUveyi6jQ
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_7s60JeZPJzZaUouA4pSFwAB
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_qXvkOoI7FnKT1azZ1fbK35q
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_FYVHlbB1x3QvEnTRTPky2hu
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_isfO8K06XgxJg8r88TH45wa
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_UxlBAMRfjQ8gF12sUJCd2qP
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_kkZQJVJb98ybwYaiEKTvh3w
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_fAU617B1VN3pv9oRQusoGWa

Draft:
I’m doing a premium-first refresh sweep of the **top priority areas only** now:
- Garching
- Ismaning
- Oberschleißheim
- Unterschleißheim

I’ll force-refresh the live result pages and look for **new private/exclusive listings** that weren’t worth contacting before.The premium refresh worked; I’ve got all four live result pages reloaded. Now I’m pulling just the listing cards from each one so I can spot actual new additions quickly.I refreshed all four priority areas with the premium view.

Short answer: **not much new and strong**, but there are a **few additions**.

### Actually new / potentially worth a look
**Unterschleißheim**
- **167240334** — 2 Zi, **61 m²**, **1.281 €**
  - still a stretch price-wise, but at least a real 2-room option
- **161486970** — 2 Zi, **60 m²**, **1.280 €**, **EBK**
  - older but still live; also stretch tier
- **168444839** — 2 Zi, **55 m²**, **1.250 €**, **möbliert**
  - only worth it if furnished is truly included and not scammy

**Ismaning**
- not really new-new, but still remaining:
  - **168179881** — 2 Zi, **49 m²**, **1.225 €**
  - **167796832** — 2 Zi, **71 m²**, **1.130–1.250 €**, but **Nachvermietung**

### New but mostly weak / not worth prioritizing
**Garching**
- **168478363** — 2 Zi, **56 m²**, **731–809 €**
  - but **Nachvermietung**, so I don’t like it
- otherwise it’s the same pool we already mined

**Oberschleißheim**
- **168404817 / 167953417** — project pages, too broad / noisy
- **168253040** — 2 Zi, **52 m²**, **1.118 €**, but **möbliert**
- **168010269** still there, but **Nachvermietung ab Aug**
- **168331752** still there, but we already disliked it

## My honest verdict
In the **strict first-priority areas**, the only remaining things I’d even consider next are:

1. **167240334** — Unterschleißheim
2. **161486970** — Unterschleißheim
3. **168179881** — Ismaning
4. **168444839** — Unterschleißheim, only if furnished is included and clean
5. **167796832** — Ismaning, only if we accept Nachvermietung

So yes, there are **a few leftovers**, but **no obvious fresh jackpot**.

If you want, I’d go in this order:
- **167240334**
- **161486970**
- then **168179881**


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 90.7s
Time: model 84.8s, overhead 3.7s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: i 10.5k o 551 t 99 cache 268.3k/96% est $0.0361; p≈2.7ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 293.1k; active 17.7k; cache 275.5k/94%; p≈3.6ktok; ctx 28.0%; usable 28.5%; epoch turns 41; lifetime turns 327; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


I’m doing a premium-first refresh sweep of the **top priority areas only** now:
- Garching
- Ismaning
- Oberschleißheim
- Unterschleißheim

I’ll force-refresh the live result pages and look for **new private/exclusive listings** that weren’t worth contacting before.The premium refresh worked; I’ve got all four live result pages reloaded. Now I’m pulling just the listing cards from each one so I can spot actual new additions quickly.I refreshed all four priority areas with the premium view.

Short answer: **not much new and strong**, but there are a **few additions**.

### Actually new / potentially worth a look
**Unterschleißheim**
- **167240334** — 2 Zi, **61 m²**, **1.281 €**
  - still a stretch price-wise, but at least a real 2-room option
- **161486970** — 2 Zi, **60 m²**, **1.280 €**, **EBK**
  - older but still live; also stretch tier
- **168444839** — 2 Zi, **55 m²**, **1.250 €**, **möbliert**
  - only worth it if furnished is truly included and not scammy

**Ismaning**
- not really new-new, but still remaining:
  - **168179881** — 2 Zi, **49 m²**, **1.225 €**
  - **167796832** — 2 Zi, **71 m²**, **1.130–1.250 €**, but **Nachvermietung**

### New but mostly weak / not worth prioritizing
**Garching**
- **168478363** — 2 Zi, **56 m²**, **731–809 €**
  - but **Nachvermietung**, so I don’t like it
- otherwise it’s the same pool we already mined

**Oberschleißheim**
- **168404817 / 167953417** — project pages, too broad / noisy
- **168253040** — 2 Zi, **52 m²**, **1.118 €**, but **möbliert**
- **168010269** still there, but **Nachvermietung ab Aug**
- **168331752** still there, but we already disliked it

## My honest verdict
In the **strict first-priority areas**, the only remaining things I’d even consider next are:

1. **167240334** — Unterschleißheim
2. **161486970** — Unterschleißheim
3. **168179881** — Ismaning
4. **168444839** — Unterschleißheim, only if furnished is included and clean
5. **167796832** — Ismaning, only if we accept Nachvermietung

So yes, there are **a few leftovers**, but **no obvious fresh jackpot**.

If you want, I’d go in this order:
- **167240334**
- **161486970**
- then **168179881**


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 91.9s
Time: model 84.8s, overhead 7.1s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: i 10.5k o 551 t 99 cache 268.3k/96% est $0.0361; p≈2.7ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 279.5k; active 11.2k; cache 268.3k/96%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 28.0%; usable 28.5%; epoch turns 41; lifetime turns 327; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


Anything in related surrounding landkreis areas? What is the first ismaning one? Also no2 from oberschleissheim ? Unter is a bit harder to get to than ober from Garching


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Ctx: direct ACP session 279.5k; active 11.2k; cache 268.3k/96%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 26.7%; usable 27.2%; epoch turns 42; lifetime turns 328; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.1s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Ctx: direct ACP session 279.5k; active 11.2k; cache 268.3k/96%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 26.7%; usable 27.2%; epoch turns 42; lifetime turns 328; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.7s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Ctx: direct ACP session 279.5k; active 11.2k; cache 268.3k/96%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 26.7%; usable 27.2%; epoch turns 42; lifetime turns 328; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 2.8s
Time: overhead 2.8s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈2.8ktok/11.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 279.5k; active 11.2k; cache 268.3k/96%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 26.7%; usable 27.2%; epoch turns 42; lifetime turns 328; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Waiting for first model/tool update…


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Yes


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Yes — in the **surrounding Landkreis belt**, the best remaining things are mostly:

- **Neufahrn — 168398031**
  - **2 Zi, 77.5 m², 1.010 €**
  - strongest outside the core four

- **Eching — 168252005**
  - **2 Zi, 63 m², 1.090 €**
  - private, decent fallback

- **Neufahrn — 164892463**
  - **2 Zi, 63 m², 1.190 €**
  - renovated, but pricier

- **Neufahrn — 166876180**
  - **2 Zi, 65.57 m², 1.180 €**
  - plausible backup

Feldkirchen/Aschheim mostly looked weaker:
- too expensive
- furnished
- or Nachvermietung-ish

The **first Ismaning one** I meant is:
- **168179881**
- **Erstbezug! Moderne 2-Zimmer-Wohnung in Ismaning**
- **49 m²**
- **1.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Yes — in the **surrounding Landkreis belt**, the best remaining things are mostly:

- **Neufahrn — 168398031**
  - **2 Zi, 77.5 m², 1.010 €**
  - strongest outside the core four

- **Eching — 168252005**
  - **2 Zi, 63 m², 1.090 €**
  - private, decent fallback

- **Neufahrn — 164892463**
  - **2 Zi, 63 m², 1.190 €**
  - renovated, but pricier

- **Neufahrn — 166876180**
  - **2 Zi, 65.57 m², 1.180 €**
  - plausible backup

Feldkirchen/Aschheim mostly looked weaker:
- too expensive
- furnished
- or Nachvermietung-ish

The **first Ismaning one** I meant is:
- **168179881**
- **Erstbezug! Moderne 2-Zimmer-Wohnung in Ismaning**
- **49 m²**
- **1.225 €**
- still okay, just a bit small and pricey

For **Oberschleißheim**, if you mean the interesting remaining one, that’s probably:
- **168010269**
- **2 Zi, 58 m²**
- **864–956 €**
- but **Nachvermietung ab Aug**
- so: good price, better location for you than USH, but worse process / timing

And yes, I agree with your commute intuition:
- **Oberschleißheim > Unterschleißheim** from Garching
- so if we’re choosing between similarly “meh” leftovers, **Oberschleißheim gets a bump**

My practical ranking now would be:

1. **168398031** — Neufahrn
2. **168252005** — Eching
3. **168010269** — Oberschleißheim, if you accept Nachvermietung/August
4. **168179881** — Ismaning
5. then the pricier Unterschleißheim leftovers

So yes: **there


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Yes — in the **surrounding Landkreis belt**, the best remaining things are mostly:

- **Neufahrn — 168398031**
  - **2 Zi, 77.5 m², 1.010 €**
  - strongest outside the core four

- **Eching — 168252005**
  - **2 Zi, 63 m², 1.090 €**
  - private, decent fallback

- **Neufahrn — 164892463**
  - **2 Zi, 63 m², 1.190 €**
  - renovated, but pricier

- **Neufahrn — 166876180**
  - **2 Zi, 65.57 m², 1.180 €**
  - plausible backup

Feldkirchen/Aschheim mostly looked weaker:
- too expensive
- furnished
- or Nachvermietung-ish

The **first Ismaning one** I meant is:
- **168179881**
- **Erstbezug! Moderne 2-Zimmer-Wohnung in Ismaning**
- **49 m²**
- **1.225 €**
- still okay, just a bit small and pricey

For **Oberschleißheim**, if you mean the interesting remaining one, that’s probably:
- **168010269**
- **2 Zi, 58 m²**
- **864–956 €**
- but **Nachvermietung ab Aug**
- so: good price, better location for you than USH, but worse process / timing

And yes, I agree with your commute intuition:
- **Oberschleißheim > Unterschleißheim** from Garching
- so if we’re choosing between similarly “meh” leftovers, **Oberschleißheim gets a bump**

My practical ranking now would be:

1. **168398031** — Neufahrn
2. **168252005** — Eching
3. **168010269** — Oberschleißheim, if you accept Nachvermietung/August
4. **168179881** — Ismaning
5. then the pricier Unterschleißheim leftovers

So yes: **there are better surrounding-Landkreis options than the remaining Unterschleißheim leftovers**.

If you want, I’d next do:
- **168398031**
- **168252005**
and only then reconsider **168010269** / **168179881**.


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 30.8s
Time: model 26.6s, overhead 2.8s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: i 16.1k o 524 t 516 cache 265.7k/94% est $0.0560; p≈2.8ktok/11.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 279.5k; active 11.2k; cache 268.3k/96%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 26.7%; usable 27.2%; epoch turns 42; lifetime turns 328; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


Yes — in the **surrounding Landkreis belt**, the best remaining things are mostly:

- **Neufahrn — 168398031**
  - **2 Zi, 77.5 m², 1.010 €**
  - strongest outside the core four

- **Eching — 168252005**
  - **2 Zi, 63 m², 1.090 €**
  - private, decent fallback

- **Neufahrn — 164892463**
  - **2 Zi, 63 m², 1.190 €**
  - renovated, but pricier

- **Neufahrn — 166876180**
  - **2 Zi, 65.57 m², 1.180 €**
  - plausible backup

Feldkirchen/Aschheim mostly looked weaker:
- too expensive
- furnished
- or Nachvermietung-ish

The **first Ismaning one** I meant is:
- **168179881**
- **Erstbezug! Moderne 2-Zimmer-Wohnung in Ismaning**
- **49 m²**
- **1.225 €**
- still okay, just a bit small and pricey

For **Oberschleißheim**, if you mean the interesting remaining one, that’s probably:
- **168010269**
- **2 Zi, 58 m²**
- **864–956 €**
- but **Nachvermietung ab Aug**
- so: good price, better location for you than USH, but worse process / timing

And yes, I agree with your commute intuition:
- **Oberschleißheim > Unterschleißheim** from Garching
- so if we’re choosing between similarly “meh” leftovers, **Oberschleißheim gets a bump**

My practical ranking now would be:

1. **168398031** — Neufahrn
2. **168252005** — Eching
3. **168010269** — Oberschleißheim, if you accept Nachvermietung/August
4. **168179881** — Ismaning
5. then the pricier Unterschleißheim leftovers

So yes: **there are better surrounding-Landkreis options than the remaining Unterschleißheim leftovers**.

If you want, I’d next do:
- **168398031**
- **168252005**
and only then reconsider **168010269** / **168179881**.


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 32.5s
Time: model 26.6s, overhead 5.8s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: i 16.1k o 524 t 516 cache 265.7k/94% est $0.0560; p≈2.8ktok/11.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 282.9k; active 17.2k; cache 265.7k/94%; p≈2.8ktok; ctx 26.7%; usable 27.2%; epoch turns 42; lifetime turns 328; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


Okay let's search in neufahrn and eching area and apply to ismaning one


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Ctx: direct ACP session 282.9k; active 17.2k; cache 265.7k/94%; p≈2.8ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 27.5%; epoch turns 43; lifetime turns 329; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.1s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Ctx: direct ACP session 282.9k; active 17.2k; cache 265.7k/94%; p≈2.8ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 27.5%; epoch turns 43; lifetime turns 329; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.1s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Ctx: direct ACP session 282.9k; active 17.2k; cache 265.7k/94%; p≈2.8ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 27.5%; epoch turns 43; lifetime turns 329; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 2.5s
Time: overhead 2.5s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈2.8ktok/11.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 282.9k; active 17.2k; cache 265.7k/94%; p≈2.8ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 27.5%; epoch turns 43; lifetime turns 329; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
I


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (1):
- persistent_browser_call / pending / call_uD0mZk6fAdvGgVUMsHDfBj4

Draft:
I’m doing both in parallel now:
1. refresh/search **Neufahrn + Eching** for the best still-sendable options
2. open **Ismaning 168179881** and prepare the contact flow for sending.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (3):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_uD0mZk6fAdvGgVUMsHDfBj4
- persistent_browser_call / in_progress / call_w2gAEOUcnXGMm2SHLU9Uko8
- persistent_browser_call / in_progress / call_ARqlYRZp5v0ATKktvBCtVYj

Draft:
I’m doing both in parallel now:
1. refresh/search **Neufahrn + Eching** for the best still-sendable options
2. open **Ismaning 168179881** and prepare the contact flow for sending.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (3):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_uD0mZk6fAdvGgVUMsHDfBj4
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_w2gAEOUcnXGMm2SHLU9Uko8
- persistent_browser_call / in_progress / call_ARqlYRZp5v0ATKktvBCtVYj

Draft:
I’m doing both in parallel now:
1. refresh/search **Neufahrn + Eching** for the best still-sendable options
2. open **Ismaning 168179881** and prepare the contact flow for sending.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (3):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_uD0mZk6fAdvGgVUMsHDfBj4
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_w2gAEOUcnXGMm2SHLU9Uko8
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_ARqlYRZp5v0ATKktvBCtVYj

Draft:
I’m doing both in parallel now:
1. refresh/search **Neufahrn + Eching** for the best still-sendable options
2. open **Ismaning 168179881** and prepare the contact flow for sending.I


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (4):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_uD0mZk6fAdvGgVUMsHDfBj4
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_w2gAEOUcnXGMm2SHLU9Uko8
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_ARqlYRZp5v0ATKktvBCtVYj
- persistent_browser_call / pending / call_hNmPgLnG2f7k8Z7elP1KIUF

Draft:
I’m doing both in parallel now:
1. refresh/search **Neufahrn + Eching** for the best still-sendable options
2. open **Ismaning 168179881** and prepare the contact flow for sending.I’ve got the two search areas open and the **Ismaning 168179881** contact form loaded. I’m extracting the best Neufahrn/Eching candidates and, in parallel, checking the live Ismaning form state so I can send it properly.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (9):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_uD0mZk6fAdvGgVUMsHDfBj4
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_w2gAEOUcnXGMm2SHLU9Uko8
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_ARqlYRZp5v0ATKktvBCtVYj
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_hNmPgLnG2f7k8Z7elP1KIUF
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_401g8eKDLIqM0JTVeH8Zs5d
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_KudNKRjXe7KgHsCGCS9spdY
- persistent_browser_call / in_progress / call_0d8tiUbZHOXeuuF337iN0yR
- persistent_browser_call / in_progress / call_5gIej3ZxiW0u0zFwQiOxFio
- persistent_browser_call / in_progress / call_3h8e5eMJS3e1v7vpbe6Ou37

Draft:
I’m doing both in parallel now:
1. refresh/search **Neufahrn + Eching** for the best still-sendable options
2. open **Ismaning 168179881** and prepare the contact flow for sending.I’ve got the two search areas open and the **Ismaning 168179881** contact form loaded. I’m extracting the best Neufahrn/Eching candidates and, in parallel, checking the live Ismaning form state so I can send it properly.


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 66.3s
Time: model 61.8s, overhead 2.5s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈2.8ktok/11.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 282.9k; active 17.2k; cache 265.7k/94%; p≈2.8ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 27.5%; epoch turns 43; lifetime turns 329; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (9):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_uD0mZk6fAdvGgVUMsHDfBj4
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_w2gAEOUcnXGMm2SHLU9Uko8
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_ARqlYRZp5v0ATKktvBCtVYj
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_hNmPgLnG2f7k8Z7elP1KIUF
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_401g8eKDLIqM0JTVeH8Zs5d
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_KudNKRjXe7KgHsCGCS9spdY
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_0d8tiUbZHOXeuuF337iN0yR
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_5gIej3ZxiW0u0zFwQiOxFio
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_3h8e5eMJS3e1v7vpbe6Ou37

Draft:
I’m doing both in parallel now:
1. refresh/search **Neufahrn + Eching** for the best still-sendable options
2. open **Ismaning 168179881** and prepare the contact flow for sending.I’ve got the two search areas open and the **Ismaning 168179881** contact form loaded. I’m extracting the best Neufahrn/Eching candidates and, in parallel, checking the live Ismaning form state so I can send it properly.I


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (10):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_uD0mZk6fAdvGgVUMsHDfBj4
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_w2gAEOUcnXGMm2SHLU9Uko8
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_ARqlYRZp5v0ATKktvBCtVYj
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_hNmPgLnG2f7k8Z7elP1KIUF
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_401g8eKDLIqM0JTVeH8Zs5d
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_KudNKRjXe7KgHsCGCS9spdY
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_0d8tiUbZHOXeuuF337iN0yR
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_5gIej3ZxiW0u0zFwQiOxFio
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_3h8e5eMJS3e1v7vpbe6Ou37
- persistent_browser_call / in_progress / call_1Swwv1qH2CUJ3TN13E3b7kp

Draft:
I’m doing both in parallel now:
1. refresh/search **Neufahrn + Eching** for the best still-sendable options
2. open **Ismaning 168179881** and prepare the contact flow for sending.I’ve got the two search areas open and the **Ismaning 168179881** contact form loaded. I’m extracting the best Neufahrn/Eching candidates and, in parallel, checking the live Ismaning form state so I can send it properly.I found the Ismaning listing owner: **Herr Michael Kratzer**. The form is still in the weaker anonymous state, so I’m switching it into the real logged-in path first before sending. For Neufahrn/Eching, the good ones still look like:
- **Neufahrn 168398031**
- **Eching 168252005**
- then **Neufahrn 164892463 / 166876180** as backups.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (11):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_uD0mZk6fAdvGgVUMsHDfBj4
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_w2gAEOUcnXGMm2SHLU9Uko8
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_ARqlYRZp5v0ATKktvBCtVYj
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_hNmPgLnG2f7k8Z7elP1KIUF
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_401g8eKDLIqM0JTVeH8Zs5d
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_KudNKRjXe7KgHsCGCS9spdY
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_0d8tiUbZHOXeuuF337iN0yR
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_5gIej3ZxiW0u0zFwQiOxFio
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_3h8e5eMJS3e1v7vpbe6Ou37
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_1Swwv1qH2CUJ3TN13E3b7kp
- persistent_browser_snapshot / pending / call_wha2QEbvq68u2CyWnxW5pns

Draft:
I’m doing both in parallel now:
1. refresh/search **Neufahrn + Eching** for the best still-sendable options
2. open **Ismaning 168179881** and prepare the contact flow for sending.I’ve got the two search areas open and the **Ismaning 168179881** contact form loaded. I’m extracting the best Neufahrn/Eching candidates and, in parallel, checking the live Ismaning form state so I can send it properly.I found the Ismaning listing owner: **Herr Michael Kratzer**. The form is still in the weaker anonymous state, so I’m switching it into the real logged-in path first before sending. For Neufahrn/Eching, the good ones still look like:
- **Neufahrn 168398031**
- **Eching 168252005**
- then **Neufahrn 164892463 / 166876180** as backups.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (11):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_uD0mZk6fAdvGgVUMsHDfBj4
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_w2gAEOUcnXGMm2SHLU9Uko8
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_ARqlYRZp5v0ATKktvBCtVYj
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_hNmPgLnG2f7k8Z7elP1KIUF
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_401g8eKDLIqM0JTVeH8Zs5d
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_KudNKRjXe7KgHsCGCS9spdY
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_0d8tiUbZHOXeuuF337iN0yR
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_5gIej3ZxiW0u0zFwQiOxFio
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_3h8e5eMJS3e1v7vpbe6Ou37
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_1Swwv1qH2CUJ3TN13E3b7kp
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_wha2QEbvq68u2CyWnxW5pns

Draft:
I’m doing both in parallel now:
1. refresh/search **Neufahrn + Eching** for the best still-sendable options
2. open **Ismaning 168179881** and prepare the contact flow for sending.I’ve got the two search areas open and the **Ismaning 168179881** contact form loaded. I’m extracting the best Neufahrn/Eching candidates and, in parallel, checking the live Ismaning form state so I can send it properly.I found the Ismaning listing owner: **Herr Michael Kratzer**. The form is still in the weaker anonymous state, so I’m switching it into the real logged-in path first before sending. For Neufahrn/Eching, the good ones still look like:
- **Neufahrn 168398031**
- **Eching 168252005**
- then **Neufahrn 164892463 / 166876180** as backups.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (12):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_uD0mZk6fAdvGgVUMsHDfBj4
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_w2gAEOUcnXGMm2SHLU9Uko8
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_ARqlYRZp5v0ATKktvBCtVYj
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_hNmPgLnG2f7k8Z7elP1KIUF
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_401g8eKDLIqM0JTVeH8Zs5d
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_KudNKRjXe7KgHsCGCS9spdY
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_0d8tiUbZHOXeuuF337iN0yR
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_5gIej3ZxiW0u0zFwQiOxFio
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_3h8e5eMJS3e1v7vpbe6Ou37
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_1Swwv1qH2CUJ3TN13E3b7kp
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_wha2QEbvq68u2CyWnxW5pns
- persistent_browser_call / in_progress / call_R4TiA9cud13Bns4MkO0y1xZ

Draft:
I’m doing both in parallel now:
1. refresh/search **Neufahrn + Eching** for the best still-sendable options
2. open **Ismaning 168179881** and prepare the contact flow for sending.I’ve got the two search areas open and the **Ismaning 168179881** contact form loaded. I’m extracting the best Neufahrn/Eching candidates and, in parallel, checking the live Ismaning form state so I can send it properly.I found the Ismaning listing owner: **Herr Michael Kratzer**. The form is still in the weaker anonymous state, so I’m switching it into the real logged-in path first before sending. For Neufahrn/Eching, the good ones still look like:
- **Neufahrn 168398031**
- **Eching 168252005**
- then **Neufahrn 164892463 / 166876180** as backups.The Ismaning listing is **Herr Michael Kratzer**. I’ve got the email step prefilled already, so I’m pushing through login and then I’ll send this listing too. Search-wise, the best Neufahrn/Eching leftovers still look like:
- **168398031** — Neufahrn
- **168252005** — Eching
- then **164892463 / 166876180** as backups.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (13):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_uD0mZk6fAdvGgVUMsHDfBj4
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_w2gAEOUcnXGMm2SHLU9Uko8
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_ARqlYRZp5v0ATKktvBCtVYj
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_hNmPgLnG2f7k8Z7elP1KIUF
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_401g8eKDLIqM0JTVeH8Zs5d
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_KudNKRjXe7KgHsCGCS9spdY
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_0d8tiUbZHOXeuuF337iN0yR
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_5gIej3ZxiW0u0zFwQiOxFio
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_3h8e5eMJS3e1v7vpbe6Ou37
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_1Swwv1qH2CUJ3TN13E3b7kp
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_wha2QEbvq68u2CyWnxW5pns
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_R4TiA9cud13Bns4MkO0y1xZ
- persistent_browser_snapshot / pending / call_ESXJwi4bhAc1fzoG3xfMBRy

Draft:
I’m doing both in parallel now:
1. refresh/search **Neufahrn + Eching** for the best still-sendable options
2. open **Ismaning 168179881** and prepare the contact flow for sending.I’ve got the two search areas open and the **Ismaning 168179881** contact form loaded. I’m extracting the best Neufahrn/Eching candidates and, in parallel, checking the live Ismaning form state so I can send it properly.I found the Ismaning listing owner: **Herr Michael Kratzer**. The form is still in the weaker anonymous state, so I’m switching it into the real logged-in path first before sending. For Neufahrn/Eching, the good ones still look like:
- **Neufahrn 168398031**
- **Eching 168252005**
- then **Neufahrn 164892463 / 166876180** as backups.The Ismaning listing is **Herr Michael Kratzer**. I’ve got the email step prefilled already, so I’m pushing through login and then I’ll send this listing too. Search-wise, the best Neufahrn/Eching leftovers still look like:
- **168398031** — Neufahrn
- **168252005** — Eching
- then **164892463 / 166876180** as backups.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (14):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_uD0mZk6fAdvGgVUMsHDfBj4
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_w2gAEOUcnXGMm2SHLU9Uko8
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_ARqlYRZp5v0ATKktvBCtVYj
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_hNmPgLnG2f7k8Z7elP1KIUF
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_401g8eKDLIqM0JTVeH8Zs5d
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_KudNKRjXe7KgHsCGCS9spdY
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_0d8tiUbZHOXeuuF337iN0yR
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_5gIej3ZxiW0u0zFwQiOxFio
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_3h8e5eMJS3e1v7vpbe6Ou37
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_1Swwv1qH2CUJ3TN13E3b7kp
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_wha2QEbvq68u2CyWnxW5pns
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_R4TiA9cud13Bns4MkO0y1xZ
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_ESXJwi4bhAc1fzoG3xfMBRy
- persistent_browser_call / pending / call_0tWxyxYO972okOxR5pbyBcP

Draft:
I’m doing both in parallel now:
1. refresh/search **Neufahrn + Eching** for the best still-sendable options
2. open **Ismaning 168179881** and prepare the contact flow for sending.I’ve got the two search areas open and the **Ismaning 168179881** contact form loaded. I’m extracting the best Neufahrn/Eching candidates and, in parallel, checking the live Ismaning form state so I can send it properly.I found the Ismaning listing owner: **Herr Michael Kratzer**. The form is still in the weaker anonymous state, so I’m switching it into the real logged-in path first before sending. For Neufahrn/Eching, the good ones still look like:
- **Neufahrn 168398031**
- **Eching 168252005**
- then **Neufahrn 164892463 / 166876180** as backups.The Ismaning listing is **Herr Michael Kratzer**. I’ve got the email step prefilled already, so I’m pushing through login and then I’ll send this listing too. Search-wise, the best Neufahrn/Eching leftovers still look like:
- **168398031** — Neufahrn
- **168252005** — Eching
- then **164892463 / 166876180** as backups.


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 128.8s
Time: model 124.3s, overhead 2.5s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈2.8ktok/11.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 282.9k; active 17.2k; cache 265.7k/94%; p≈2.8ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 27.5%; epoch turns 43; lifetime turns 329; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (15):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_uD0mZk6fAdvGgVUMsHDfBj4
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_w2gAEOUcnXGMm2SHLU9Uko8
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_ARqlYRZp5v0ATKktvBCtVYj
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_hNmPgLnG2f7k8Z7elP1KIUF
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_401g8eKDLIqM0JTVeH8Zs5d
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_KudNKRjXe7KgHsCGCS9spdY
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_0d8tiUbZHOXeuuF337iN0yR
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_5gIej3ZxiW0u0zFwQiOxFio
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_3h8e5eMJS3e1v7vpbe6Ou37
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_1Swwv1qH2CUJ3TN13E3b7kp
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_wha2QEbvq68u2CyWnxW5pns
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_R4TiA9cud13Bns4MkO0y1xZ
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_ESXJwi4bhAc1fzoG3xfMBRy
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_0tWxyxYO972okOxR5pbyBcP
- persistent_browser_call / pending / call_uxxKWpWM7NzSb3ISQCl7bLU

Draft:
I’m doing both in parallel now:
1. refresh/search **Neufahrn + Eching** for the best still-sendable options
2. open **Ismaning 168179881** and prepare the contact flow for sending.I’ve got the two search areas open and the **Ismaning 168179881** contact form loaded. I’m extracting the best Neufahrn/Eching candidates and, in parallel, checking the live Ismaning form state so I can send it properly.I found the Ismaning listing owner: **Herr Michael Kratzer**. The form is still in the weaker anonymous state, so I’m switching it into the real logged-in path first before sending. For Neufahrn/Eching, the good ones still look like:
- **Neufahrn 168398031**
- **Eching 168252005**
- then **Neufahrn 164892463 / 166876180** as backups.The Ismaning listing is **Herr Michael Kratzer**. I’ve got the email step prefilled already, so I’m pushing through login and then I’ll send this listing too. Search-wise, the best Neufahrn/Eching leftovers still look like:
- **168398031** — Neufahrn
- **168252005** — Eching
- then **164892463 / 166876180** as backups.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (15):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_uD0mZk6fAdvGgVUMsHDfBj4
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_w2gAEOUcnXGMm2SHLU9Uko8
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_ARqlYRZp5v0ATKktvBCtVYj
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_hNmPgLnG2f7k8Z7elP1KIUF
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_401g8eKDLIqM0JTVeH8Zs5d
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_KudNKRjXe7KgHsCGCS9spdY
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_0d8tiUbZHOXeuuF337iN0yR
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_5gIej3ZxiW0u0zFwQiOxFio
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_3h8e5eMJS3e1v7vpbe6Ou37
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_1Swwv1qH2CUJ3TN13E3b7kp
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_wha2QEbvq68u2CyWnxW5pns
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_R4TiA9cud13Bns4MkO0y1xZ
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_ESXJwi4bhAc1fzoG3xfMBRy
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_0tWxyxYO972okOxR5pbyBcP
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_uxxKWpWM7NzSb3ISQCl7bLU

Draft:
I’m doing both in parallel now:
1. refresh/search **Neufahrn + Eching** for the best still-sendable options
2. open **Ismaning 168179881** and prepare the contact flow for sending.I’ve got the two search areas open and the **Ismaning 168179881** contact form loaded. I’m extracting the best Neufahrn/Eching candidates and, in parallel, checking the live Ismaning form state so I can send it properly.I found the Ismaning listing owner: **Herr Michael Kratzer**. The form is still in the weaker anonymous state, so I’m switching it into the real logged-in path first before sending. For Neufahrn/Eching, the good ones still look like:
- **Neufahrn 168398031**
- **Eching 168252005**
- then **Neufahrn 164892463 / 166876180** as backups.The Ismaning listing is **Herr Michael Kratzer**. I’ve got the email step prefilled already, so I’m pushing through login and then I’ll send this listing too. Search-wise, the best Neufahrn/Eching leftovers still look like:
- **168398031** — Neufahrn
- **168252005** — Eching
- then **164892463 / 166876180** as backups.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (16):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_uD0mZk6fAdvGgVUMsHDfBj4
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_w2gAEOUcnXGMm2SHLU9Uko8
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_ARqlYRZp5v0ATKktvBCtVYj
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_hNmPgLnG2f7k8Z7elP1KIUF
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_401g8eKDLIqM0JTVeH8Zs5d
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_KudNKRjXe7KgHsCGCS9spdY
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_0d8tiUbZHOXeuuF337iN0yR
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_5gIej3ZxiW0u0zFwQiOxFio
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_3h8e5eMJS3e1v7vpbe6Ou37
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_1Swwv1qH2CUJ3TN13E3b7kp
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_wha2QEbvq68u2CyWnxW5pns
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_R4TiA9cud13Bns4MkO0y1xZ
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_ESXJwi4bhAc1fzoG3xfMBRy
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_0tWxyxYO972okOxR5pbyBcP
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_uxxKWpWM7NzSb3ISQCl7bLU
- persistent_browser_call / pending / call_ONJublZwEQkS2TBnKX4ef3L

Draft:
I’m doing both in parallel now:
1. refresh/search **Neufahrn + Eching** for the best still-sendable options
2. open **Ismaning 168179881** and prepare the contact flow for sending.I’ve got the two search areas open and the **Ismaning 168179881** contact form loaded. I’m extracting the best Neufahrn/Eching candidates and, in parallel, checking the live Ismaning form state so I can send it properly.I found the Ismaning listing owner: **Herr Michael Kratzer**. The form is still in the weaker anonymous state, so I’m switching it into the real logged-in path first before sending. For Neufahrn/Eching, the good ones still look like:
- **Neufahrn 168398031**
- **Eching 168252005**
- then **Neufahrn 164892463 / 166876180** as backups.The Ismaning listing is **Herr Michael Kratzer**. I’ve got the email step prefilled already, so I’m pushing through login and then I’ll send this listing too. Search-wise, the best Neufahrn/Eching leftovers still look like:
- **168398031** — Neufahrn
- **168252005** — Eching
- then **164892463 / 166876180** as backups.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (16):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_uD0mZk6fAdvGgVUMsHDfBj4
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_w2gAEOUcnXGMm2SHLU9Uko8
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_ARqlYRZp5v0ATKktvBCtVYj
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_hNmPgLnG2f7k8Z7elP1KIUF
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_401g8eKDLIqM0JTVeH8Zs5d
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_KudNKRjXe7KgHsCGCS9spdY
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_0d8tiUbZHOXeuuF337iN0yR
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_5gIej3ZxiW0u0zFwQiOxFio
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_3h8e5eMJS3e1v7vpbe6Ou37
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_1Swwv1qH2CUJ3TN13E3b7kp
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_wha2QEbvq68u2CyWnxW5pns
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_R4TiA9cud13Bns4MkO0y1xZ
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_ESXJwi4bhAc1fzoG3xfMBRy
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_0tWxyxYO972okOxR5pbyBcP
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_uxxKWpWM7NzSb3ISQCl7bLU
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_ONJublZwEQkS2TBnKX4ef3L

Draft:
I’m doing both in parallel now:
1. refresh/search **Neufahrn + Eching** for the best still-sendable options
2. open **Ismaning 168179881** and prepare the contact flow for sending.I’ve got the two search areas open and the **Ismaning 168179881** contact form loaded. I’m extracting the best Neufahrn/Eching candidates and, in parallel, checking the live Ismaning form state so I can send it properly.I found the Ismaning listing owner: **Herr Michael Kratzer**. The form is still in the weaker anonymous state, so I’m switching it into the real logged-in path first before sending. For Neufahrn/Eching, the good ones still look like:
- **Neufahrn 168398031**
- **Eching 168252005**
- then **Neufahrn 164892463 / 166876180** as backups.The Ismaning listing is **Herr Michael Kratzer**. I’ve got the email step prefilled already, so I’m pushing through login and then I’ll send this listing too. Search-wise, the best Neufahrn/Eching leftovers still look like:
- **168398031** — Neufahrn
- **168252005** — Eching
- then **164892463 / 166876180** as backups.The


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (18):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_uD0mZk6fAdvGgVUMsHDfBj4
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_w2gAEOUcnXGMm2SHLU9Uko8
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_ARqlYRZp5v0ATKktvBCtVYj
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_hNmPgLnG2f7k8Z7elP1KIUF
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_401g8eKDLIqM0JTVeH8Zs5d
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_KudNKRjXe7KgHsCGCS9spdY
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_0d8tiUbZHOXeuuF337iN0yR
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_5gIej3ZxiW0u0zFwQiOxFio
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_3h8e5eMJS3e1v7vpbe6Ou37
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_1Swwv1qH2CUJ3TN13E3b7kp
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_wha2QEbvq68u2CyWnxW5pns
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_R4TiA9cud13Bns4MkO0y1xZ
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_ESXJwi4bhAc1fzoG3xfMBRy
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_0tWxyxYO972okOxR5pbyBcP
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_uxxKWpWM7NzSb3ISQCl7bLU
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_ONJublZwEQkS2TBnKX4ef3L
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_myDxYEQaTyg7PvGrvdg9xzN
- persistent_browser_call / pending / call_vw8IDAkcz4rgpjfng3pQpi5

Draft:
I’m doing both in parallel now:
1. refresh/search **Neufahrn + Eching** for the best still-sendable options
2. open **Ismaning 168179881** and prepare the contact flow for sending.I’ve got the two search areas open and the **Ismaning 168179881** contact form loaded. I’m extracting the best Neufahrn/Eching candidates and, in parallel, checking the live Ismaning form state so I can send it properly.I found the Ismaning listing owner: **Herr Michael Kratzer**. The form is still in the weaker anonymous state, so I’m switching it into the real logged-in path first before sending. For Neufahrn/Eching, the good ones still look like:
- **Neufahrn 168398031**
- **Eching 168252005**
- then **Neufahrn 164892463 / 166876180** as backups.The Ismaning listing is **Herr Michael Kratzer**. I’ve got the email step prefilled already, so I’m pushing through login and then I’ll send this listing too. Search-wise, the best Neufahrn/Eching leftovers still look like:
- **168398031** — Neufahrn
- **168252005** — Eching
- then **164892463 / 166876180** as backups.The owner is **Herr Michael Kratzer**. I’ve restored the logged-in path, and I’m filling the adapted Ismaning message now. Then I’ll see whether it goes straight to captcha or complains about missing fields.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (18):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_uD0mZk6fAdvGgVUMsHDfBj4
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_w2gAEOUcnXGMm2SHLU9Uko8
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_ARqlYRZp5v0ATKktvBCtVYj
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_hNmPgLnG2f7k8Z7elP1KIUF
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_401g8eKDLIqM0JTVeH8Zs5d
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_KudNKRjXe7KgHsCGCS9spdY
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_0d8tiUbZHOXeuuF337iN0yR
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_5gIej3ZxiW0u0zFwQiOxFio
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_3h8e5eMJS3e1v7vpbe6Ou37
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_1Swwv1qH2CUJ3TN13E3b7kp
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_wha2QEbvq68u2CyWnxW5pns
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_R4TiA9cud13Bns4MkO0y1xZ
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_ESXJwi4bhAc1fzoG3xfMBRy
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_0tWxyxYO972okOxR5pbyBcP
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_uxxKWpWM7NzSb3ISQCl7bLU
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_ONJublZwEQkS2TBnKX4ef3L
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_myDxYEQaTyg7PvGrvdg9xzN
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_vw8IDAkcz4rgpjfng3pQpi5

Draft:
I’m doing both in parallel now:
1. refresh/search **Neufahrn + Eching** for the best still-sendable options
2. open **Ismaning 168179881** and prepare the contact flow for sending.I’ve got the two search areas open and the **Ismaning 168179881** contact form loaded. I’m extracting the best Neufahrn/Eching candidates and, in parallel, checking the live Ismaning form state so I can send it properly.I found the Ismaning listing owner: **Herr Michael Kratzer**. The form is still in the weaker anonymous state, so I’m switching it into the real logged-in path first before sending. For Neufahrn/Eching, the good ones still look like:
- **Neufahrn 168398031**
- **Eching 168252005**
- then **Neufahrn 164892463 / 166876180** as backups.The Ismaning listing is **Herr Michael Kratzer**. I’ve got the email step prefilled already, so I’m pushing through login and then I’ll send this listing too. Search-wise, the best Neufahrn/Eching leftovers still look like:
- **168398031** — Neufahrn
- **168252005** — Eching
- then **164892463 / 166876180** as backups.The owner is **Herr Michael Kratzer**. I’ve restored the logged-in path, and I’m filling the adapted Ismaning message now. Then I’ll see whether it goes straight to captcha or complains about missing fields.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (18):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_w2gAEOUcnXGMm2SHLU9Uko8
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_ARqlYRZp5v0ATKktvBCtVYj
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_hNmPgLnG2f7k8Z7elP1KIUF
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_401g8eKDLIqM0JTVeH8Zs5d
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_KudNKRjXe7KgHsCGCS9spdY
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_0d8tiUbZHOXeuuF337iN0yR
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_5gIej3ZxiW0u0zFwQiOxFio
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_3h8e5eMJS3e1v7vpbe6Ou37
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_1Swwv1qH2CUJ3TN13E3b7kp
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_wha2QEbvq68u2CyWnxW5pns
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_R4TiA9cud13Bns4MkO0y1xZ
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_ESXJwi4bhAc1fzoG3xfMBRy
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_0tWxyxYO972okOxR5pbyBcP
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_uxxKWpWM7NzSb3ISQCl7bLU
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_ONJublZwEQkS2TBnKX4ef3L
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_myDxYEQaTyg7PvGrvdg9xzN
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_vw8IDAkcz4rgpjfng3pQpi5
- persistent_browser_call / pending / call_YfiE8y4B587TY6EXO2HH2N9

Draft:
I’m doing both in parallel now:
1. refresh/search **Neufahrn + Eching** for the best still-sendable options
2. open **Ismaning 168179881** and prepare the contact flow for sending.I’ve got the two search areas open and the **Ismaning 168179881** contact form loaded. I’m extracting the best Neufahrn/Eching candidates and, in parallel, checking the live Ismaning form state so I can send it properly.I found the Ismaning listing owner: **Herr Michael Kratzer**. The form is still in the weaker anonymous state, so I’m switching it into the real logged-in path first before sending. For Neufahrn/Eching, the good ones still look like:
- **Neufahrn 168398031**
- **Eching 168252005**
- then **Neufahrn 164892463 / 166876180** as backups.The Ismaning listing is **Herr Michael Kratzer**. I’ve got the email step prefilled already, so I’m pushing through login and then I’ll send this listing too. Search-wise, the best Neufahrn/Eching leftovers still look like:
- **168398031** — Neufahrn
- **168252005** — Eching
- then **164892463 / 166876180** as backups.The owner is **Herr Michael Kratzer**. I’ve restored the logged-in path, and I’m filling the adapted Ismaning message now. Then I’ll see whether it goes straight to captcha or complains about missing fields.


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 191.4s
Time: model 186.9s, overhead 2.5s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈2.8ktok/11.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 282.9k; active 17.2k; cache 265.7k/94%; p≈2.8ktok; ctx 27.0%; usable 27.5%; epoch turns 43; lifetime turns 329; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z