* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: tool / completed / tool_gmdw7nOfjtW9d9CiqdDjjBl | glob / pending / tool_kt6O4NQTUQwUywBaGnJkUR9 | tool / completed / tool_kt6O4NQTUQwUywBaGnJkUR9 | bash / pending / tool_5XUrGJgwWJfCWr4Vo0xZ856
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: glob / pending / tool_kt6O4NQTUQwUywBaGnJkUR9 | tool / completed / tool_kt6O4NQTUQwUywBaGnJkUR9 | bash / pending / tool_5XUrGJgwWJfCWr4Vo0xZ856 | List app scripts directory / completed / tool_5XUrGJgwWJfCWr4Vo0xZ856
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: tool / completed / tool_kt6O4NQTUQwUywBaGnJkUR9 | bash / pending / tool_5XUrGJgwWJfCWr4Vo0xZ856 | List app scripts directory / completed / tool_5XUrGJgwWJfCWr4Vo0xZ856 | read / pending / tool_SQFhICJGhL7uNZgnvqboTMJ
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Elapsed: 12.8s
Time: model 11.0s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: tool / completed / tool_kt6O4NQTUQwUywBaGnJkUR9 | bash / pending / tool_5XUrGJgwWJfCWr4Vo0xZ856 | List app scripts directory / completed / tool_5XUrGJgwWJfCWr4Vo0xZ856 | read / pending / tool_SQFhICJGhL7uNZgnvqboTMJ
Draft:
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: bash / pending / tool_5XUrGJgwWJfCWr4Vo0xZ856 | List app scripts directory / completed / tool_5XUrGJgwWJfCWr4Vo0xZ856 | read / pending / tool_SQFhICJGhL7uNZgnvqboTMJ | ../../app/scripts/matrix-lite-direct-acp-client.mjs / completed / tool_SQFhICJGhL7uNZgnvqboTMJ
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: List app scripts directory / completed / tool_5XUrGJgwWJfCWr4Vo0xZ856 | read / pending / tool_SQFhICJGhL7uNZgnvqboTMJ | ../../app/scripts/matrix-lite-direct-acp-client.mjs / completed / tool_SQFhICJGhL7uNZgnvqboTMJ | bash / pending / tool_QsHSehDeLQ73kS9z0cb7llS
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: read / pending / tool_SQFhICJGhL7uNZgnvqboTMJ | ../../app/scripts/matrix-lite-direct-acp-client.mjs / completed / tool_SQFhICJGhL7uNZgnvqboTMJ | bash / pending / tool_QsHSehDeLQ73kS9z0cb7llS | bash / failed / tool_QsHSehDeLQ73kS9z0cb7llS
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: ../../app/scripts/matrix-lite-direct-acp-client.mjs / completed / tool_SQFhICJGhL7uNZgnvqboTMJ | bash / pending / tool_QsHSehDeLQ73kS9z0cb7llS | bash / failed / tool_QsHSehDeLQ73kS9z0cb7llS | bash / pending / tool_vtoBl9Xobb7kR9Ymaq2Hijb
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: bash / pending / tool_QsHSehDeLQ73kS9z0cb7llS | bash / failed / tool_QsHSehDeLQ73kS9z0cb7llS | bash / pending / tool_vtoBl9Xobb7kR9Ymaq2Hijb | Search for direct ACP client invocations / completed / tool_vtoBl9Xobb7kR9Ymaq2Hijb
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: bash / failed / tool_QsHSehDeLQ73kS9z0cb7llS | bash / pending / tool_vtoBl9Xobb7kR9Ymaq2Hijb | Search for direct ACP client invocations / completed / tool_vtoBl9Xobb7kR9Ymaq2Hijb | bash / pending / tool_BaIdY0BY2v5GaVXc2Sc9pUe
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: bash / pending / tool_vtoBl9Xobb7kR9Ymaq2Hijb | Search for direct ACP client invocations / completed / tool_vtoBl9Xobb7kR9Ymaq2Hijb | bash / pending / tool_BaIdY0BY2v5GaVXc2Sc9pUe | bash / failed / tool_BaIdY0BY2v5GaVXc2Sc9pUe
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: Search for direct ACP client invocations / completed / tool_vtoBl9Xobb7kR9Ymaq2Hijb | bash / pending / tool_BaIdY0BY2v5GaVXc2Sc9pUe | bash / failed / tool_BaIdY0BY2v5GaVXc2Sc9pUe | matrix_lite_status_permission_preflight / pending / tool_rShmdwLxjTgazSp4jY6GfXh
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: bash / pending / tool_BaIdY0BY2v5GaVXc2Sc9pUe | bash / failed / tool_BaIdY0BY2v5GaVXc2Sc9pUe | matrix_lite_status_permission_preflight / pending / tool_rShmdwLxjTgazSp4jY6GfXh | tool / completed / tool_rShmdwLxjTgazSp4jY6GfXh
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: bash / failed / tool_BaIdY0BY2v5GaVXc2Sc9pUe | matrix_lite_status_permission_preflight / pending / tool_rShmdwLxjTgazSp4jY6GfXh | tool / completed / tool_rShmdwLxjTgazSp4jY6GfXh | matrix_lite_status_permission_preflight / pending / tool_z0c4OF0q6J3vaa4EQJKRTPj
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: matrix_lite_status_permission_preflight / pending / tool_rShmdwLxjTgazSp4jY6GfXh | tool / completed / tool_rShmdwLxjTgazSp4jY6GfXh | matrix_lite_status_permission_preflight / pending / tool_z0c4OF0q6J3vaa4EQJKRTPj | tool / completed / tool_z0c4OF0q6J3vaa4EQJKRTPj
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: tool / completed / tool_rShmdwLxjTgazSp4jY6GfXh | matrix_lite_status_permission_preflight / pending / tool_z0c4OF0q6J3vaa4EQJKRTPj | tool / completed / tool_z0c4OF0q6J3vaa4EQJKRTPj | bash / pending / tool_ZAMs0iU5XXvRUK7fAJjUo3H
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: matrix_lite_status_permission_preflight / pending / tool_z0c4OF0q6J3vaa4EQJKRTPj | tool / completed / tool_z0c4OF0q6J3vaa4EQJKRTPj | bash / pending / tool_ZAMs0iU5XXvRUK7fAJjUo3H | Search for direct ACP client references / completed / tool_ZAMs0iU5XXvRUK7fAJjUo3H
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Elapsed: 18.6s
Time: model 16.7s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: matrix_lite_status_permission_preflight / pending / tool_z0c4OF0q6J3vaa4EQJKRTPj | tool / completed / tool_z0c4OF0q6J3vaa4EQJKRTPj | bash / pending / tool_ZAMs0iU5XXvRUK7fAJjUo3H | Search for direct ACP client references / completed / tool_ZAMs0iU5XXvRUK7fAJjUo3H
Draft:
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: tool / completed / tool_z0c4OF0q6J3vaa4EQJKRTPj | bash / pending / tool_ZAMs0iU5XXvRUK7fAJjUo3H | Search for direct ACP client references / completed / tool_ZAMs0iU5XXvRUK7fAJjUo3H | bash / pending / tool_97zbUvitzpCzDEPhXpk7usb
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: bash / pending / tool_ZAMs0iU5XXvRUK7fAJjUo3H | Search for direct ACP client references / completed / tool_ZAMs0iU5XXvRUK7fAJjUo3H | bash / pending / tool_97zbUvitzpCzDEPhXpk7usb | Search for permission-mode references / completed / tool_97zbUvitzpCzDEPhXpk7usb
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: Search for direct ACP client references / completed / tool_ZAMs0iU5XXvRUK7fAJjUo3H | bash / pending / tool_97zbUvitzpCzDEPhXpk7usb | Search for permission-mode references / completed / tool_97zbUvitzpCzDEPhXpk7usb | bash / pending / tool_0I9iazS3lTdj0WXjWkDnRfy
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: bash / pending / tool_97zbUvitzpCzDEPhXpk7usb | Search for permission-mode references / completed / tool_97zbUvitzpCzDEPhXpk7usb | bash / pending / tool_0I9iazS3lTdj0WXjWkDnRfy | Search for direct ACP client references broadly / completed / tool_0I9iazS3lTdj0WXjWkDnRfy
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: Search for permission-mode references / completed / tool_97zbUvitzpCzDEPhXpk7usb | bash / pending / tool_0I9iazS3lTdj0WXjWkDnRfy | Search for direct ACP client references broadly / completed / tool_0I9iazS3lTdj0WXjWkDnRfy | read / pending / tool_EdOzBtVZEYm86oF0IV8jYyp
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: bash / pending / tool_0I9iazS3lTdj0WXjWkDnRfy | Search for direct ACP client references broadly / completed / tool_0I9iazS3lTdj0WXjWkDnRfy | read / pending / tool_EdOzBtVZEYm86oF0IV8jYyp | ../../config/matrix-lite.json / completed / tool_EdOzBtVZEYm86oF0IV8jYyp
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: Search for direct ACP client references broadly / completed / tool_0I9iazS3lTdj0WXjWkDnRfy | read / pending / tool_EdOzBtVZEYm86oF0IV8jYyp | ../../config/matrix-lite.json / completed / tool_EdOzBtVZEYm86oF0IV8jYyp | bash / pending / tool_gzOe5StRm244pyHZU9N5KT7
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: read / pending / tool_EdOzBtVZEYm86oF0IV8jYyp | ../../config/matrix-lite.json / completed / tool_EdOzBtVZEYm86oF0IV8jYyp | bash / pending / tool_gzOe5StRm244pyHZU9N5KT7 | bash / failed / tool_gzOe5StRm244pyHZU9N5KT7
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: ../../config/matrix-lite.json / completed / tool_EdOzBtVZEYm86oF0IV8jYyp | bash / pending / tool_gzOe5StRm244pyHZU9N5KT7 | bash / failed / tool_gzOe5StRm244pyHZU9N5KT7 | matrix_lite_status_permission_preflight / pending / tool_0ytVhLBoYy2vs1krDa2p3f2
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: bash / pending / tool_gzOe5StRm244pyHZU9N5KT7 | bash / failed / tool_gzOe5StRm244pyHZU9N5KT7 | matrix_lite_status_permission_preflight / pending / tool_0ytVhLBoYy2vs1krDa2p3f2 | tool / completed / tool_0ytVhLBoYy2vs1krDa2p3f2
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: bash / failed / tool_gzOe5StRm244pyHZU9N5KT7 | matrix_lite_status_permission_preflight / pending / tool_0ytVhLBoYy2vs1krDa2p3f2 | tool / completed / tool_0ytVhLBoYy2vs1krDa2p3f2 | bash / pending / tool_OXQWSNCIXFb7x2mZgoSoGbL
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: matrix_lite_status_permission_preflight / pending / tool_0ytVhLBoYy2vs1krDa2p3f2 | tool / completed / tool_0ytVhLBoYy2vs1krDa2p3f2 | bash / pending / tool_OXQWSNCIXFb7x2mZgoSoGbL | Search for matrix_permissions in daemon code / completed / tool_OXQWSNCIXFb7x2mZgoSoGbL
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Elapsed: 24.3s
Time: model 22.5s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: matrix_lite_status_permission_preflight / pending / tool_0ytVhLBoYy2vs1krDa2p3f2 | tool / completed / tool_0ytVhLBoYy2vs1krDa2p3f2 | bash / pending / tool_OXQWSNCIXFb7x2mZgoSoGbL | Search for matrix_permissions in daemon code / completed / tool_OXQWSNCIXFb7x2mZgoSoGbL
Draft:
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: tool / completed / tool_0ytVhLBoYy2vs1krDa2p3f2 | bash / pending / tool_OXQWSNCIXFb7x2mZgoSoGbL | Search for matrix_permissions in daemon code / completed / tool_OXQWSNCIXFb7x2mZgoSoGbL | bash / pending / tool_eTXPSsXnQ6IPyDOWf1TIoXn
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: bash / pending / tool_OXQWSNCIXFb7x2mZgoSoGbL | Search for matrix_permissions in daemon code / completed / tool_OXQWSNCIXFb7x2mZgoSoGbL | bash / pending / tool_eTXPSsXnQ6IPyDOWf1TIoXn | Find line number of matrix permissions function / completed / tool_eTXPSsXnQ6IPyDOWf1TIoXn
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: Search for matrix_permissions in daemon code / completed / tool_OXQWSNCIXFb7x2mZgoSoGbL | bash / pending / tool_eTXPSsXnQ6IPyDOWf1TIoXn | Find line number of matrix permissions function / completed / tool_eTXPSsXnQ6IPyDOWf1TIoXn | read / pending / tool_Fdw3TYJqDVE3MJfHaMQhKb0
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: bash / pending / tool_eTXPSsXnQ6IPyDOWf1TIoXn | Find line number of matrix permissions function / completed / tool_eTXPSsXnQ6IPyDOWf1TIoXn | read / pending / tool_Fdw3TYJqDVE3MJfHaMQhKb0 | ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / tool_Fdw3TYJqDVE3MJfHaMQhKb0
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: Find line number of matrix permissions function / completed / tool_eTXPSsXnQ6IPyDOWf1TIoXn | read / pending / tool_Fdw3TYJqDVE3MJfHaMQhKb0 | ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / tool_Fdw3TYJqDVE3MJfHaMQhKb0 | bash / pending / tool_6Nm9l6ZT5pHy6V9D0KwpkZQ
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: read / pending / tool_Fdw3TYJqDVE3MJfHaMQhKb0 | ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / tool_Fdw3TYJqDVE3MJfHaMQhKb0 | bash / pending / tool_6Nm9l6ZT5pHy6V9D0KwpkZQ | Find line number of approval creation function / completed / tool_6Nm9l6ZT5pHy6V9D0KwpkZQ
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / tool_Fdw3TYJqDVE3MJfHaMQhKb0 | bash / pending / tool_6Nm9l6ZT5pHy6V9D0KwpkZQ | Find line number of approval creation function / completed / tool_6Nm9l6ZT5pHy6V9D0KwpkZQ | read / pending / tool_aTB7Qf1Ewhz0eHiJazSfcuI
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: bash / pending / tool_6Nm9l6ZT5pHy6V9D0KwpkZQ | Find line number of approval creation function / completed / tool_6Nm9l6ZT5pHy6V9D0KwpkZQ | read / pending / tool_aTB7Qf1Ewhz0eHiJazSfcuI | ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / tool_aTB7Qf1Ewhz0eHiJazSfcuI
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: Find line number of approval creation function / completed / tool_6Nm9l6ZT5pHy6V9D0KwpkZQ | read / pending / tool_aTB7Qf1Ewhz0eHiJazSfcuI | ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / tool_aTB7Qf1Ewhz0eHiJazSfcuI | bash / pending / tool_yhaJXeRHZ4Fff3jLdAzn1di
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: read / pending / tool_aTB7Qf1Ewhz0eHiJazSfcuI | ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / tool_aTB7Qf1Ewhz0eHiJazSfcuI | bash / pending / tool_yhaJXeRHZ4Fff3jLdAzn1di | bash / failed / tool_yhaJXeRHZ4Fff3jLdAzn1di
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / tool_aTB7Qf1Ewhz0eHiJazSfcuI | bash / pending / tool_yhaJXeRHZ4Fff3jLdAzn1di | bash / failed / tool_yhaJXeRHZ4Fff3jLdAzn1di | bash / pending / tool_ZIPhpyaRGjuxz96dScmTgnT
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: bash / pending / tool_yhaJXeRHZ4Fff3jLdAzn1di | bash / failed / tool_yhaJXeRHZ4Fff3jLdAzn1di | bash / pending / tool_ZIPhpyaRGjuxz96dScmTgnT | Check recent approval entries / completed / tool_ZIPhpyaRGjuxz96dScmTgnT
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Elapsed: 30.4s
Time: model 28.6s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: bash / pending / tool_yhaJXeRHZ4Fff3jLdAzn1di | bash / failed / tool_yhaJXeRHZ4Fff3jLdAzn1di | bash / pending / tool_ZIPhpyaRGjuxz96dScmTgnT | Check recent approval entries / completed / tool_ZIPhpyaRGjuxz96dScmTgnT
Draft:
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: bash / failed / tool_yhaJXeRHZ4Fff3jLdAzn1di | bash / pending / tool_ZIPhpyaRGjuxz96dScmTgnT | Check recent approval entries / completed / tool_ZIPhpyaRGjuxz96dScmTgnT | bash / pending / tool_IxN0ot2iAD7PB8GbyuNI0hD
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: bash / pending / tool_ZIPhpyaRGjuxz96dScmTgnT | Check recent approval entries / completed / tool_ZIPhpyaRGjuxz96dScmTgnT | bash / pending / tool_IxN0ot2iAD7PB8GbyuNI0hD | List state directory contents / completed / tool_IxN0ot2iAD7PB8GbyuNI0hD
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
I'll investigate the permission system independently and figure out what options are available for more dynamic grants.

Let me start by examining the actual configuration and the direct ACP client code:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: bash / pending / tool_ZIPhpyaRGjuxz96dScmTgnT | Check recent approval entries / completed / tool_ZIPhpyaRGjuxz96dScmTgnT | bash / pending / tool_IxN0ot2iAD7PB8GbyuNI0hD | List state directory contents / completed / tool_IxN0ot2iAD7PB8GbyuNI0hD
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
eractive "approve on the fly" for regular tools** — not just sudo. When a tool call is denied by the static allowlist, the daemon:
1. Posts an approval request in the Matrix room
2. Waits for your "approve" or "deny" reaction
3. Resumes the turn with the granted permission

## What I Couldn't Verify

- Whether there are any recent approval entries in `/home/matrix-lite/state/approvals.json` (the file exists but I couldn't read it before hitting the step limit)
- Whether the approval UI/reactions are working correctly in the Matrix room
- Whether there's a bug preventing approvals from being created or consumed

## Next Steps

If interactive approvals aren't working as expected:
1. **Check the daemon logs** for approval-related errors
2. **Verify the Matrix room reactions** are being parsed correctly
3. **Test with a simple denied action** to see if an approval request appears in the room


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: Check recent approval entries / completed / tool_ZIPhpyaRGjuxz96dScmTgnT | bash / pending / tool_IxN0ot2iAD7PB8GbyuNI0hD | List state directory contents / completed / tool_IxN0ot2iAD7PB8GbyuNI0hD | read / pending / tool_njUwHnQNL3PAqi3ZX1SmA8z
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
e: "matrix"`
- When a tool is denied by the static allowlist, the daemon posts an approval request in this room
- You can approve/deny, and the turn resumes
- This is separate from the privileged broker (which handles root/sudo)

**What I couldn't verify:**
- Whether approval requests are actually appearing in the room when needed
- Whether there are any recent approval entries in the state files

Want me to:
1. **Test it** — try a deliberately-denied action and see if an approval request pops up?
2. **Check the approvals state** to see if any recent ones were created?
3. **Something else entirely** — you mentioned wanting to clean up test lines from a file earlier?Let me test the interactive approval system by attempting something that's not pre-allowed. I'll try to read a system log file that should be denied by the static allowlist, which should trigger a Matrix-room approval request.


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: bash / pending / tool_IxN0ot2iAD7PB8GbyuNI0hD | List state directory contents / completed / tool_IxN0ot2iAD7PB8GbyuNI0hD | read / pending / tool_njUwHnQNL3PAqi3ZX1SmA8z | read / failed / tool_njUwHnQNL3PAqi3ZX1SmA8z
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
e: "matrix"`
- When a tool is denied by the static allowlist, the daemon posts an approval request in this room
- You can approve/deny, and the turn resumes
- This is separate from the privileged broker (which handles root/sudo)

**What I couldn't verify:**
- Whether approval requests are actually appearing in the room when needed
- Whether there are any recent approval entries in the state files

Want me to:
1. **Test it** — try a deliberately-denied action and see if an approval request pops up?
2. **Check the approvals state** to see if any recent ones were created?
3. **Something else entirely** — you mentioned wanting to clean up test lines from a file earlier?Let me test the interactive approval system by attempting something that's not pre-allowed. I'll try to read a system log file that should be denied by the static allowlist, which should trigger a Matrix-room approval request.


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: List state directory contents / completed / tool_IxN0ot2iAD7PB8GbyuNI0hD | read / pending / tool_njUwHnQNL3PAqi3ZX1SmA8z | read / failed / tool_njUwHnQNL3PAqi3ZX1SmA8z | read / pending / tool_OQPLhPfpbK3cZK5ErzoV2oT
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
st in this room
- You can approve/deny, and the turn resumes
- This is separate from the privileged broker (which handles root/sudo)

**What I couldn't verify:**
- Whether approval requests are actually appearing in the room when needed
- Whether there are any recent approval entries in the state files

Want me to:
1. **Test it** — try a deliberately-denied action and see if an approval request pops up?
2. **Check the approvals state** to see if any recent ones were created?
3. **Something else entirely** — you mentioned wanting to clean up test lines from a file earlier?Let me test the interactive approval system by attempting something that's not pre-allowed. I'll try to read a system log file that should be denied by the static allowlist, which should trigger a Matrix-room approval request.Good — that was denied as expected. Let me check if an approval request was created in the room:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: read / pending / tool_njUwHnQNL3PAqi3ZX1SmA8z | read / failed / tool_njUwHnQNL3PAqi3ZX1SmA8z | read / pending / tool_OQPLhPfpbK3cZK5ErzoV2oT | ../../state/approvals.json / completed / tool_OQPLhPfpbK3cZK5ErzoV2oT
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
st in this room
- You can approve/deny, and the turn resumes
- This is separate from the privileged broker (which handles root/sudo)

**What I couldn't verify:**
- Whether approval requests are actually appearing in the room when needed
- Whether there are any recent approval entries in the state files

Want me to:
1. **Test it** — try a deliberately-denied action and see if an approval request pops up?
2. **Check the approvals state** to see if any recent ones were created?
3. **Something else entirely** — you mentioned wanting to clean up test lines from a file earlier?Let me test the interactive approval system by attempting something that's not pre-allowed. I'll try to read a system log file that should be denied by the static allowlist, which should trigger a Matrix-room approval request.Good — that was denied as expected. Let me check if an approval request was created in the room:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: read / failed / tool_njUwHnQNL3PAqi3ZX1SmA8z | read / pending / tool_OQPLhPfpbK3cZK5ErzoV2oT | ../../state/approvals.json / completed / tool_OQPLhPfpbK3cZK5ErzoV2oT | read / pending / tool_GRpF5aRXi7ApCzVJzk9j2s2
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
st in this room
- You can approve/deny, and the turn resumes
- This is separate from the privileged broker (which handles root/sudo)

**What I couldn't verify:**
- Whether approval requests are actually appearing in the room when needed
- Whether there are any recent approval entries in the state files

Want me to:
1. **Test it** — try a deliberately-denied action and see if an approval request pops up?
2. **Check the approvals state** to see if any recent ones were created?
3. **Something else entirely** — you mentioned wanting to clean up test lines from a file earlier?Let me test the interactive approval system by attempting something that's not pre-allowed. I'll try to read a system log file that should be denied by the static allowlist, which should trigger a Matrix-room approval request.Good — that was denied as expected. Let me check if an approval request was created in the room:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: read / pending / tool_OQPLhPfpbK3cZK5ErzoV2oT | ../../state/approvals.json / completed / tool_OQPLhPfpbK3cZK5ErzoV2oT | read / pending / tool_GRpF5aRXi7ApCzVJzk9j2s2 | ../../state/approvals.json / completed / tool_GRpF5aRXi7ApCzVJzk9j2s2
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
st in this room
- You can approve/deny, and the turn resumes
- This is separate from the privileged broker (which handles root/sudo)

**What I couldn't verify:**
- Whether approval requests are actually appearing in the room when needed
- Whether there are any recent approval entries in the state files

Want me to:
1. **Test it** — try a deliberately-denied action and see if an approval request pops up?
2. **Check the approvals state** to see if any recent ones were created?
3. **Something else entirely** — you mentioned wanting to clean up test lines from a file earlier?Let me test the interactive approval system by attempting something that's not pre-allowed. I'll try to read a system log file that should be denied by the static allowlist, which should trigger a Matrix-room approval request.Good — that was denied as expected. Let me check if an approval request was created in the room:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: ../../state/approvals.json / completed / tool_OQPLhPfpbK3cZK5ErzoV2oT | read / pending / tool_GRpF5aRXi7ApCzVJzk9j2s2 | ../../state/approvals.json / completed / tool_GRpF5aRXi7ApCzVJzk9j2s2 | bash / pending / tool_UPmntiY3jTCbcW9n4iLmheZ
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
st in this room
- You can approve/deny, and the turn resumes
- This is separate from the privileged broker (which handles root/sudo)

**What I couldn't verify:**
- Whether approval requests are actually appearing in the room when needed
- Whether there are any recent approval entries in the state files

Want me to:
1. **Test it** — try a deliberately-denied action and see if an approval request pops up?
2. **Check the approvals state** to see if any recent ones were created?
3. **Something else entirely** — you mentioned wanting to clean up test lines from a file earlier?Let me test the interactive approval system by attempting something that's not pre-allowed. I'll try to read a system log file that should be denied by the static allowlist, which should trigger a Matrix-room approval request.Good — that was denied as expected. Let me check if an approval request was created in the room:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: read / pending / tool_GRpF5aRXi7ApCzVJzk9j2s2 | ../../state/approvals.json / completed / tool_GRpF5aRXi7ApCzVJzk9j2s2 | bash / pending / tool_UPmntiY3jTCbcW9n4iLmheZ | bash / failed / tool_UPmntiY3jTCbcW9n4iLmheZ
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
st in this room
- You can approve/deny, and the turn resumes
- This is separate from the privileged broker (which handles root/sudo)

**What I couldn't verify:**
- Whether approval requests are actually appearing in the room when needed
- Whether there are any recent approval entries in the state files

Want me to:
1. **Test it** — try a deliberately-denied action and see if an approval request pops up?
2. **Check the approvals state** to see if any recent ones were created?
3. **Something else entirely** — you mentioned wanting to clean up test lines from a file earlier?Let me test the interactive approval system by attempting something that's not pre-allowed. I'll try to read a system log file that should be denied by the static allowlist, which should trigger a Matrix-room approval request.Good — that was denied as expected. Let me check if an approval request was created in the room:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: ../../state/approvals.json / completed / tool_GRpF5aRXi7ApCzVJzk9j2s2 | bash / pending / tool_UPmntiY3jTCbcW9n4iLmheZ | bash / failed / tool_UPmntiY3jTCbcW9n4iLmheZ | bash / pending / tool_r27FbmMjatSvnW7pVyeWy9M
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
st in this room
- You can approve/deny, and the turn resumes
- This is separate from the privileged broker (which handles root/sudo)

**What I couldn't verify:**
- Whether approval requests are actually appearing in the room when needed
- Whether there are any recent approval entries in the state files

Want me to:
1. **Test it** — try a deliberately-denied action and see if an approval request pops up?
2. **Check the approvals state** to see if any recent ones were created?
3. **Something else entirely** — you mentioned wanting to clean up test lines from a file earlier?Let me test the interactive approval system by attempting something that's not pre-allowed. I'll try to read a system log file that should be denied by the static allowlist, which should trigger a Matrix-room approval request.Good — that was denied as expected. Let me check if an approval request was created in the room:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Elapsed: 36.5s
Time: model 34.6s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: ../../state/approvals.json / completed / tool_GRpF5aRXi7ApCzVJzk9j2s2 | bash / pending / tool_UPmntiY3jTCbcW9n4iLmheZ | bash / failed / tool_UPmntiY3jTCbcW9n4iLmheZ | bash / pending / tool_r27FbmMjatSvnW7pVyeWy9M
Draft:
st in this room
- You can approve/deny, and the turn resumes
- This is separate from the privileged broker (which handles root/sudo)

**What I couldn't verify:**
- Whether approval requests are actually appearing in the room when needed
- Whether there are any recent approval entries in the state files

Want me to:
1. **Test it** — try a deliberately-denied action and see if an approval request pops up?
2. **Check the approvals state** to see if any recent ones were created?
3. **Something else entirely** — you mentioned wanting to clean up test lines from a file earlier?Let me test the interactive approval system by attempting something that's not pre-allowed. I'll try to read a system log file that should be denied by the static allowlist, which should trigger a Matrix-room approval request.Good — that was denied as expected. Let me check if an approval request was created in the room:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: bash / pending / tool_UPmntiY3jTCbcW9n4iLmheZ | bash / failed / tool_UPmntiY3jTCbcW9n4iLmheZ | bash / pending / tool_r27FbmMjatSvnW7pVyeWy9M | bash / failed / tool_r27FbmMjatSvnW7pVyeWy9M
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
st in this room
- You can approve/deny, and the turn resumes
- This is separate from the privileged broker (which handles root/sudo)

**What I couldn't verify:**
- Whether approval requests are actually appearing in the room when needed
- Whether there are any recent approval entries in the state files

Want me to:
1. **Test it** — try a deliberately-denied action and see if an approval request pops up?
2. **Check the approvals state** to see if any recent ones were created?
3. **Something else entirely** — you mentioned wanting to clean up test lines from a file earlier?Let me test the interactive approval system by attempting something that's not pre-allowed. I'll try to read a system log file that should be denied by the static allowlist, which should trigger a Matrix-room approval request.Good — that was denied as expected. Let me check if an approval request was created in the room:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: bash / failed / tool_UPmntiY3jTCbcW9n4iLmheZ | bash / pending / tool_r27FbmMjatSvnW7pVyeWy9M | bash / failed / tool_r27FbmMjatSvnW7pVyeWy9M | read / pending / tool_VGuy0nRElUCzQnjVHhZymmS
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
st in this room
- You can approve/deny, and the turn resumes
- This is separate from the privileged broker (which handles root/sudo)

**What I couldn't verify:**
- Whether approval requests are actually appearing in the room when needed
- Whether there are any recent approval entries in the state files

Want me to:
1. **Test it** — try a deliberately-denied action and see if an approval request pops up?
2. **Check the approvals state** to see if any recent ones were created?
3. **Something else entirely** — you mentioned wanting to clean up test lines from a file earlier?Let me test the interactive approval system by attempting something that's not pre-allowed. I'll try to read a system log file that should be denied by the static allowlist, which should trigger a Matrix-room approval request.Good — that was denied as expected. Let me check if an approval request was created in the room:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: bash / pending / tool_r27FbmMjatSvnW7pVyeWy9M | bash / failed / tool_r27FbmMjatSvnW7pVyeWy9M | read / pending / tool_VGuy0nRElUCzQnjVHhZymmS | ../../state/approvals.json / completed / tool_VGuy0nRElUCzQnjVHhZymmS
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
st in this room
- You can approve/deny, and the turn resumes
- This is separate from the privileged broker (which handles root/sudo)

**What I couldn't verify:**
- Whether approval requests are actually appearing in the room when needed
- Whether there are any recent approval entries in the state files

Want me to:
1. **Test it** — try a deliberately-denied action and see if an approval request pops up?
2. **Check the approvals state** to see if any recent ones were created?
3. **Something else entirely** — you mentioned wanting to clean up test lines from a file earlier?Let me test the interactive approval system by attempting something that's not pre-allowed. I'll try to read a system log file that should be denied by the static allowlist, which should trigger a Matrix-room approval request.Good — that was denied as expected. Let me check if an approval request was created in the room:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: bash / failed / tool_r27FbmMjatSvnW7pVyeWy9M | read / pending / tool_VGuy0nRElUCzQnjVHhZymmS | ../../state/approvals.json / completed / tool_VGuy0nRElUCzQnjVHhZymmS | read / pending / tool_KhWptGx5QPrxkFqspYf6iEG
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
st in this room
- You can approve/deny, and the turn resumes
- This is separate from the privileged broker (which handles root/sudo)

**What I couldn't verify:**
- Whether approval requests are actually appearing in the room when needed
- Whether there are any recent approval entries in the state files

Want me to:
1. **Test it** — try a deliberately-denied action and see if an approval request pops up?
2. **Check the approvals state** to see if any recent ones were created?
3. **Something else entirely** — you mentioned wanting to clean up test lines from a file earlier?Let me test the interactive approval system by attempting something that's not pre-allowed. I'll try to read a system log file that should be denied by the static allowlist, which should trigger a Matrix-room approval request.Good — that was denied as expected. Let me check if an approval request was created in the room:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: read / pending / tool_VGuy0nRElUCzQnjVHhZymmS | ../../state/approvals.json / completed / tool_VGuy0nRElUCzQnjVHhZymmS | read / pending / tool_KhWptGx5QPrxkFqspYf6iEG | ../../state/approvals.json / completed / tool_KhWptGx5QPrxkFqspYf6iEG
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
st in this room
- You can approve/deny, and the turn resumes
- This is separate from the privileged broker (which handles root/sudo)

**What I couldn't verify:**
- Whether approval requests are actually appearing in the room when needed
- Whether there are any recent approval entries in the state files

Want me to:
1. **Test it** — try a deliberately-denied action and see if an approval request pops up?
2. **Check the approvals state** to see if any recent ones were created?
3. **Something else entirely** — you mentioned wanting to clean up test lines from a file earlier?Let me test the interactive approval system by attempting something that's not pre-allowed. I'll try to read a system log file that should be denied by the static allowlist, which should trigger a Matrix-room approval request.Good — that was denied as expected. Let me check if an approval request was created in the room:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: ../../state/approvals.json / completed / tool_VGuy0nRElUCzQnjVHhZymmS | read / pending / tool_KhWptGx5QPrxkFqspYf6iEG | ../../state/approvals.json / completed / tool_KhWptGx5QPrxkFqspYf6iEG | bash / pending / tool_fTR0rfQ9gz1oBzuEDEOw3Tp
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
ry a deliberately-denied action and see if an approval request pops up?
2. **Check the approvals state** to see if any recent ones were created?
3. **Something else entirely** — you mentioned wanting to clean up test lines from a file earlier?Let me test the interactive approval system by attempting something that's not pre-allowed. I'll try to read a system log file that should be denied by the static allowlist, which should trigger a Matrix-room approval request.Good — that was denied as expected. Let me check if an approval request was created in the room:Interesting — the last approval is a privileged_broker one from 01:37, and there's no new approval from my `/var/log/syslog` read attempt. This tells me something important: **when tools are denied in native ACP mode, no approval request is being created**.

Let me investigate why by checking how the native ACP backend is configured:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: read / pending / tool_KhWptGx5QPrxkFqspYf6iEG | ../../state/approvals.json / completed / tool_KhWptGx5QPrxkFqspYf6iEG | bash / pending / tool_fTR0rfQ9gz1oBzuEDEOw3Tp | bash / failed / tool_fTR0rfQ9gz1oBzuEDEOw3Tp
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
ry a deliberately-denied action and see if an approval request pops up?
2. **Check the approvals state** to see if any recent ones were created?
3. **Something else entirely** — you mentioned wanting to clean up test lines from a file earlier?Let me test the interactive approval system by attempting something that's not pre-allowed. I'll try to read a system log file that should be denied by the static allowlist, which should trigger a Matrix-room approval request.Good — that was denied as expected. Let me check if an approval request was created in the room:Interesting — the last approval is a privileged_broker one from 01:37, and there's no new approval from my `/var/log/syslog` read attempt. This tells me something important: **when tools are denied in native ACP mode, no approval request is being created**.

Let me investigate why by checking how the native ACP backend is configured:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: ../../state/approvals.json / completed / tool_KhWptGx5QPrxkFqspYf6iEG | bash / pending / tool_fTR0rfQ9gz1oBzuEDEOw3Tp | bash / failed / tool_fTR0rfQ9gz1oBzuEDEOw3Tp | read / pending / tool_j5mIfCHJ7xjgzXm08uQpWUQ
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
ry a deliberately-denied action and see if an approval request pops up?
2. **Check the approvals state** to see if any recent ones were created?
3. **Something else entirely** — you mentioned wanting to clean up test lines from a file earlier?Let me test the interactive approval system by attempting something that's not pre-allowed. I'll try to read a system log file that should be denied by the static allowlist, which should trigger a Matrix-room approval request.Good — that was denied as expected. Let me check if an approval request was created in the room:Interesting — the last approval is a privileged_broker one from 01:37, and there's no new approval from my `/var/log/syslog` read attempt. This tells me something important: **when tools are denied in native ACP mode, no approval request is being created**.

Let me investigate why by checking how the native ACP backend is configured:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: bash / pending / tool_fTR0rfQ9gz1oBzuEDEOw3Tp | bash / failed / tool_fTR0rfQ9gz1oBzuEDEOw3Tp | read / pending / tool_j5mIfCHJ7xjgzXm08uQpWUQ | ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / tool_j5mIfCHJ7xjgzXm08uQpWUQ
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
ry a deliberately-denied action and see if an approval request pops up?
2. **Check the approvals state** to see if any recent ones were created?
3. **Something else entirely** — you mentioned wanting to clean up test lines from a file earlier?Let me test the interactive approval system by attempting something that's not pre-allowed. I'll try to read a system log file that should be denied by the static allowlist, which should trigger a Matrix-room approval request.Good — that was denied as expected. Let me check if an approval request was created in the room:Interesting — the last approval is a privileged_broker one from 01:37, and there's no new approval from my `/var/log/syslog` read attempt. This tells me something important: **when tools are denied in native ACP mode, no approval request is being created**.

Let me investigate why by checking how the native ACP backend is configured:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: bash / failed / tool_fTR0rfQ9gz1oBzuEDEOw3Tp | read / pending / tool_j5mIfCHJ7xjgzXm08uQpWUQ | ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / tool_j5mIfCHJ7xjgzXm08uQpWUQ | read / pending / tool_jN1X2DzBp74lbobDtAJTSzQ
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
ry a deliberately-denied action and see if an approval request pops up?
2. **Check the approvals state** to see if any recent ones were created?
3. **Something else entirely** — you mentioned wanting to clean up test lines from a file earlier?Let me test the interactive approval system by attempting something that's not pre-allowed. I'll try to read a system log file that should be denied by the static allowlist, which should trigger a Matrix-room approval request.Good — that was denied as expected. Let me check if an approval request was created in the room:Interesting — the last approval is a privileged_broker one from 01:37, and there's no new approval from my `/var/log/syslog` read attempt. This tells me something important: **when tools are denied in native ACP mode, no approval request is being created**.

Let me investigate why by checking how the native ACP backend is configured:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: read / pending / tool_j5mIfCHJ7xjgzXm08uQpWUQ | ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / tool_j5mIfCHJ7xjgzXm08uQpWUQ | read / pending / tool_jN1X2DzBp74lbobDtAJTSzQ | ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / tool_jN1X2DzBp74lbobDtAJTSzQ
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
ry a deliberately-denied action and see if an approval request pops up?
2. **Check the approvals state** to see if any recent ones were created?
3. **Something else entirely** — you mentioned wanting to clean up test lines from a file earlier?Let me test the interactive approval system by attempting something that's not pre-allowed. I'll try to read a system log file that should be denied by the static allowlist, which should trigger a Matrix-room approval request.Good — that was denied as expected. Let me check if an approval request was created in the room:Interesting — the last approval is a privileged_broker one from 01:37, and there's no new approval from my `/var/log/syslog` read attempt. This tells me something important: **when tools are denied in native ACP mode, no approval request is being created**.

Let me investigate why by checking how the native ACP backend is configured:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / tool_j5mIfCHJ7xjgzXm08uQpWUQ | read / pending / tool_jN1X2DzBp74lbobDtAJTSzQ | ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / tool_jN1X2DzBp74lbobDtAJTSzQ | bash / pending / tool_T1Lhz5e0y9rvKhfGue3Eyiq
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
ry a deliberately-denied action and see if an approval request pops up?
2. **Check the approvals state** to see if any recent ones were created?
3. **Something else entirely** — you mentioned wanting to clean up test lines from a file earlier?Let me test the interactive approval system by attempting something that's not pre-allowed. I'll try to read a system log file that should be denied by the static allowlist, which should trigger a Matrix-room approval request.Good — that was denied as expected. Let me check if an approval request was created in the room:Interesting — the last approval is a privileged_broker one from 01:37, and there's no new approval from my `/var/log/syslog` read attempt. This tells me something important: **when tools are denied in native ACP mode, no approval request is being created**.

Let me investigate why by checking how the native ACP backend is configured:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Elapsed: 42.5s
Time: model 40.6s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / tool_j5mIfCHJ7xjgzXm08uQpWUQ | read / pending / tool_jN1X2DzBp74lbobDtAJTSzQ | ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / tool_jN1X2DzBp74lbobDtAJTSzQ | bash / pending / tool_T1Lhz5e0y9rvKhfGue3Eyiq
Draft:
ry a deliberately-denied action and see if an approval request pops up?
2. **Check the approvals state** to see if any recent ones were created?
3. **Something else entirely** — you mentioned wanting to clean up test lines from a file earlier?Let me test the interactive approval system by attempting something that's not pre-allowed. I'll try to read a system log file that should be denied by the static allowlist, which should trigger a Matrix-room approval request.Good — that was denied as expected. Let me check if an approval request was created in the room:Interesting — the last approval is a privileged_broker one from 01:37, and there's no new approval from my `/var/log/syslog` read attempt. This tells me something important: **when tools are denied in native ACP mode, no approval request is being created**.

Let me investigate why by checking how the native ACP backend is configured:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: read / pending / tool_jN1X2DzBp74lbobDtAJTSzQ | ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / tool_jN1X2DzBp74lbobDtAJTSzQ | bash / pending / tool_T1Lhz5e0y9rvKhfGue3Eyiq | bash / failed / tool_T1Lhz5e0y9rvKhfGue3Eyiq
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
ry a deliberately-denied action and see if an approval request pops up?
2. **Check the approvals state** to see if any recent ones were created?
3. **Something else entirely** — you mentioned wanting to clean up test lines from a file earlier?Let me test the interactive approval system by attempting something that's not pre-allowed. I'll try to read a system log file that should be denied by the static allowlist, which should trigger a Matrix-room approval request.Good — that was denied as expected. Let me check if an approval request was created in the room:Interesting — the last approval is a privileged_broker one from 01:37, and there's no new approval from my `/var/log/syslog` read attempt. This tells me something important: **when tools are denied in native ACP mode, no approval request is being created**.

Let me investigate why by checking how the native ACP backend is configured:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / tool_jN1X2DzBp74lbobDtAJTSzQ | bash / pending / tool_T1Lhz5e0y9rvKhfGue3Eyiq | bash / failed / tool_T1Lhz5e0y9rvKhfGue3Eyiq | bash / pending / tool_2tE5kEKAQaErlSy67UPghQe
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
ry a deliberately-denied action and see if an approval request pops up?
2. **Check the approvals state** to see if any recent ones were created?
3. **Something else entirely** — you mentioned wanting to clean up test lines from a file earlier?Let me test the interactive approval system by attempting something that's not pre-allowed. I'll try to read a system log file that should be denied by the static allowlist, which should trigger a Matrix-room approval request.Good — that was denied as expected. Let me check if an approval request was created in the room:Interesting — the last approval is a privileged_broker one from 01:37, and there's no new approval from my `/var/log/syslog` read attempt. This tells me something important: **when tools are denied in native ACP mode, no approval request is being created**.

Let me investigate why by checking how the native ACP backend is configured:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: bash / pending / tool_T1Lhz5e0y9rvKhfGue3Eyiq | bash / failed / tool_T1Lhz5e0y9rvKhfGue3Eyiq | bash / pending / tool_2tE5kEKAQaErlSy67UPghQe | Search for acpx prompt function / completed / tool_2tE5kEKAQaErlSy67UPghQe
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
ry a deliberately-denied action and see if an approval request pops up?
2. **Check the approvals state** to see if any recent ones were created?
3. **Something else entirely** — you mentioned wanting to clean up test lines from a file earlier?Let me test the interactive approval system by attempting something that's not pre-allowed. I'll try to read a system log file that should be denied by the static allowlist, which should trigger a Matrix-room approval request.Good — that was denied as expected. Let me check if an approval request was created in the room:Interesting — the last approval is a privileged_broker one from 01:37, and there's no new approval from my `/var/log/syslog` read attempt. This tells me something important: **when tools are denied in native ACP mode, no approval request is being created**.

Let me investigate why by checking how the native ACP backend is configured:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: bash / failed / tool_T1Lhz5e0y9rvKhfGue3Eyiq | bash / pending / tool_2tE5kEKAQaErlSy67UPghQe | Search for acpx prompt function / completed / tool_2tE5kEKAQaErlSy67UPghQe | bash / pending / tool_HyYQiEAHajSiLytkr1Z1pUe
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
ry a deliberately-denied action and see if an approval request pops up?
2. **Check the approvals state** to see if any recent ones were created?
3. **Something else entirely** — you mentioned wanting to clean up test lines from a file earlier?Let me test the interactive approval system by attempting something that's not pre-allowed. I'll try to read a system log file that should be denied by the static allowlist, which should trigger a Matrix-room approval request.Good — that was denied as expected. Let me check if an approval request was created in the room:Interesting — the last approval is a privileged_broker one from 01:37, and there's no new approval from my `/var/log/syslog` read attempt. This tells me something important: **when tools are denied in native ACP mode, no approval request is being created**.

Let me investigate why by checking how the native ACP backend is configured:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: bash / pending / tool_2tE5kEKAQaErlSy67UPghQe | Search for acpx prompt function / completed / tool_2tE5kEKAQaErlSy67UPghQe | bash / pending / tool_HyYQiEAHajSiLytkr1Z1pUe | Find acpx_prompt line number / completed / tool_HyYQiEAHajSiLytkr1Z1pUe
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
ry a deliberately-denied action and see if an approval request pops up?
2. **Check the approvals state** to see if any recent ones were created?
3. **Something else entirely** — you mentioned wanting to clean up test lines from a file earlier?Let me test the interactive approval system by attempting something that's not pre-allowed. I'll try to read a system log file that should be denied by the static allowlist, which should trigger a Matrix-room approval request.Good — that was denied as expected. Let me check if an approval request was created in the room:Interesting — the last approval is a privileged_broker one from 01:37, and there's no new approval from my `/var/log/syslog` read attempt. This tells me something important: **when tools are denied in native ACP mode, no approval request is being created**.

Let me investigate why by checking how the native ACP backend is configured:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: Search for acpx prompt function / completed / tool_2tE5kEKAQaErlSy67UPghQe | bash / pending / tool_HyYQiEAHajSiLytkr1Z1pUe | Find acpx_prompt line number / completed / tool_HyYQiEAHajSiLytkr1Z1pUe | read / pending / tool_UM7i9GJPhBRgdC6dXobyxFl
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
ry a deliberately-denied action and see if an approval request pops up?
2. **Check the approvals state** to see if any recent ones were created?
3. **Something else entirely** — you mentioned wanting to clean up test lines from a file earlier?Let me test the interactive approval system by attempting something that's not pre-allowed. I'll try to read a system log file that should be denied by the static allowlist, which should trigger a Matrix-room approval request.Good — that was denied as expected. Let me check if an approval request was created in the room:Interesting — the last approval is a privileged_broker one from 01:37, and there's no new approval from my `/var/log/syslog` read attempt. This tells me something important: **when tools are denied in native ACP mode, no approval request is being created**.

Let me investigate why by checking how the native ACP backend is configured:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: bash / pending / tool_HyYQiEAHajSiLytkr1Z1pUe | Find acpx_prompt line number / completed / tool_HyYQiEAHajSiLytkr1Z1pUe | read / pending / tool_UM7i9GJPhBRgdC6dXobyxFl | ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / tool_UM7i9GJPhBRgdC6dXobyxFl
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
ry a deliberately-denied action and see if an approval request pops up?
2. **Check the approvals state** to see if any recent ones were created?
3. **Something else entirely** — you mentioned wanting to clean up test lines from a file earlier?Let me test the interactive approval system by attempting something that's not pre-allowed. I'll try to read a system log file that should be denied by the static allowlist, which should trigger a Matrix-room approval request.Good — that was denied as expected. Let me check if an approval request was created in the room:Interesting — the last approval is a privileged_broker one from 01:37, and there's no new approval from my `/var/log/syslog` read attempt. This tells me something important: **when tools are denied in native ACP mode, no approval request is being created**.

Let me investigate why by checking how the native ACP backend is configured:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: Find acpx_prompt line number / completed / tool_HyYQiEAHajSiLytkr1Z1pUe | read / pending / tool_UM7i9GJPhBRgdC6dXobyxFl | ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / tool_UM7i9GJPhBRgdC6dXobyxFl | read / pending / tool_CKMEkxGWQ9YyIfsn4098cV9
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
ry a deliberately-denied action and see if an approval request pops up?
2. **Check the approvals state** to see if any recent ones were created?
3. **Something else entirely** — you mentioned wanting to clean up test lines from a file earlier?Let me test the interactive approval system by attempting something that's not pre-allowed. I'll try to read a system log file that should be denied by the static allowlist, which should trigger a Matrix-room approval request.Good — that was denied as expected. Let me check if an approval request was created in the room:Interesting — the last approval is a privileged_broker one from 01:37, and there's no new approval from my `/var/log/syslog` read attempt. This tells me something important: **when tools are denied in native ACP mode, no approval request is being created**.

Let me investigate why by checking how the native ACP backend is configured:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: read / pending / tool_UM7i9GJPhBRgdC6dXobyxFl | ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / tool_UM7i9GJPhBRgdC6dXobyxFl | read / pending / tool_CKMEkxGWQ9YyIfsn4098cV9 | ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / tool_CKMEkxGWQ9YyIfsn4098cV9
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
ry a deliberately-denied action and see if an approval request pops up?
2. **Check the approvals state** to see if any recent ones were created?
3. **Something else entirely** — you mentioned wanting to clean up test lines from a file earlier?Let me test the interactive approval system by attempting something that's not pre-allowed. I'll try to read a system log file that should be denied by the static allowlist, which should trigger a Matrix-room approval request.Good — that was denied as expected. Let me check if an approval request was created in the room:Interesting — the last approval is a privileged_broker one from 01:37, and there's no new approval from my `/var/log/syslog` read attempt. This tells me something important: **when tools are denied in native ACP mode, no approval request is being created**.

Let me investigate why by checking how the native ACP backend is configured:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / tool_UM7i9GJPhBRgdC6dXobyxFl | read / pending / tool_CKMEkxGWQ9YyIfsn4098cV9 | ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / tool_CKMEkxGWQ9YyIfsn4098cV9 | read / pending / tool_i2uQxtv5IHqZWrIKt3hqfsX
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
ry a deliberately-denied action and see if an approval request pops up?
2. **Check the approvals state** to see if any recent ones were created?
3. **Something else entirely** — you mentioned wanting to clean up test lines from a file earlier?Let me test the interactive approval system by attempting something that's not pre-allowed. I'll try to read a system log file that should be denied by the static allowlist, which should trigger a Matrix-room approval request.Good — that was denied as expected. Let me check if an approval request was created in the room:Interesting — the last approval is a privileged_broker one from 01:37, and there's no new approval from my `/var/log/syslog` read attempt. This tells me something important: **when tools are denied in native ACP mode, no approval request is being created**.

Let me investigate why by checking how the native ACP backend is configured:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: read / pending / tool_CKMEkxGWQ9YyIfsn4098cV9 | ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / tool_CKMEkxGWQ9YyIfsn4098cV9 | read / pending / tool_i2uQxtv5IHqZWrIKt3hqfsX | ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / tool_i2uQxtv5IHqZWrIKt3hqfsX
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
ry a deliberately-denied action and see if an approval request pops up?
2. **Check the approvals state** to see if any recent ones were created?
3. **Something else entirely** — you mentioned wanting to clean up test lines from a file earlier?Let me test the interactive approval system by attempting something that's not pre-allowed. I'll try to read a system log file that should be denied by the static allowlist, which should trigger a Matrix-room approval request.Good — that was denied as expected. Let me check if an approval request was created in the room:Interesting — the last approval is a privileged_broker one from 01:37, and there's no new approval from my `/var/log/syslog` read attempt. This tells me something important: **when tools are denied in native ACP mode, no approval request is being created**.

Let me investigate why by checking how the native ACP backend is configured:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / tool_CKMEkxGWQ9YyIfsn4098cV9 | read / pending / tool_i2uQxtv5IHqZWrIKt3hqfsX | ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / tool_i2uQxtv5IHqZWrIKt3hqfsX | matrix_lite_status_context_usage_report / pending / tool_iHawlDrSK3ns59SEXkKrrig
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
approvals state** to see if any recent ones were created?
3. **Something else entirely** — you mentioned wanting to clean up test lines from a file earlier?Let me test the interactive approval system by attempting something that's not pre-allowed. I'll try to read a system log file that should be denied by the static allowlist, which should trigger a Matrix-room approval request.Good — that was denied as expected. Let me check if an approval request was created in the room:Interesting — the last approval is a privileged_broker one from 01:37, and there's no new approval from my `/var/log/syslog` read attempt. This tells me something important: **when tools are denied in native ACP mode, no approval request is being created**.

Let me investigate why by checking how the native ACP backend is configured:I found the key issue! Let me check what backend the current session is actually using:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: read / pending / tool_i2uQxtv5IHqZWrIKt3hqfsX | ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / tool_i2uQxtv5IHqZWrIKt3hqfsX | matrix_lite_status_context_usage_report / pending / tool_iHawlDrSK3ns59SEXkKrrig | tool / completed / tool_iHawlDrSK3ns59SEXkKrrig
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
approvals state** to see if any recent ones were created?
3. **Something else entirely** — you mentioned wanting to clean up test lines from a file earlier?Let me test the interactive approval system by attempting something that's not pre-allowed. I'll try to read a system log file that should be denied by the static allowlist, which should trigger a Matrix-room approval request.Good — that was denied as expected. Let me check if an approval request was created in the room:Interesting — the last approval is a privileged_broker one from 01:37, and there's no new approval from my `/var/log/syslog` read attempt. This tells me something important: **when tools are denied in native ACP mode, no approval request is being created**.

Let me investigate why by checking how the native ACP backend is configured:I found the key issue! Let me check what backend the current session is actually using:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Elapsed: 48.4s
Time: model 46.6s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: read / pending / tool_i2uQxtv5IHqZWrIKt3hqfsX | ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / tool_i2uQxtv5IHqZWrIKt3hqfsX | matrix_lite_status_context_usage_report / pending / tool_iHawlDrSK3ns59SEXkKrrig | tool / completed / tool_iHawlDrSK3ns59SEXkKrrig
Draft:
approvals state** to see if any recent ones were created?
3. **Something else entirely** — you mentioned wanting to clean up test lines from a file earlier?Let me test the interactive approval system by attempting something that's not pre-allowed. I'll try to read a system log file that should be denied by the static allowlist, which should trigger a Matrix-room approval request.Good — that was denied as expected. Let me check if an approval request was created in the room:Interesting — the last approval is a privileged_broker one from 01:37, and there's no new approval from my `/var/log/syslog` read attempt. This tells me something important: **when tools are denied in native ACP mode, no approval request is being created**.

Let me investigate why by checking how the native ACP backend is configured:I found the key issue! Let me check what backend the current session is actually using:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / tool_i2uQxtv5IHqZWrIKt3hqfsX | matrix_lite_status_context_usage_report / pending / tool_iHawlDrSK3ns59SEXkKrrig | tool / completed / tool_iHawlDrSK3ns59SEXkKrrig | bash / pending / tool_8NzigaB8EVzoJnIoZxYenRb
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
approvals state** to see if any recent ones were created?
3. **Something else entirely** — you mentioned wanting to clean up test lines from a file earlier?Let me test the interactive approval system by attempting something that's not pre-allowed. I'll try to read a system log file that should be denied by the static allowlist, which should trigger a Matrix-room approval request.Good — that was denied as expected. Let me check if an approval request was created in the room:Interesting — the last approval is a privileged_broker one from 01:37, and there's no new approval from my `/var/log/syslog` read attempt. This tells me something important: **when tools are denied in native ACP mode, no approval request is being created**.

Let me investigate why by checking how the native ACP backend is configured:I found the key issue! Let me check what backend the current session is actually using:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: matrix_lite_status_context_usage_report / pending / tool_iHawlDrSK3ns59SEXkKrrig | tool / completed / tool_iHawlDrSK3ns59SEXkKrrig | bash / pending / tool_8NzigaB8EVzoJnIoZxYenRb | List ACPX sessions directory / completed / tool_8NzigaB8EVzoJnIoZxYenRb
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
approvals state** to see if any recent ones were created?
3. **Something else entirely** — you mentioned wanting to clean up test lines from a file earlier?Let me test the interactive approval system by attempting something that's not pre-allowed. I'll try to read a system log file that should be denied by the static allowlist, which should trigger a Matrix-room approval request.Good — that was denied as expected. Let me check if an approval request was created in the room:Interesting — the last approval is a privileged_broker one from 01:37, and there's no new approval from my `/var/log/syslog` read attempt. This tells me something important: **when tools are denied in native ACP mode, no approval request is being created**.

Let me investigate why by checking how the native ACP backend is configured:I found the key issue! Let me check what backend the current session is actually using:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: tool / completed / tool_iHawlDrSK3ns59SEXkKrrig | bash / pending / tool_8NzigaB8EVzoJnIoZxYenRb | List ACPX sessions directory / completed / tool_8NzigaB8EVzoJnIoZxYenRb | bash / pending / tool_AQOmEHZnU9wuEinGYna6Dlz
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
approvals state** to see if any recent ones were created?
3. **Something else entirely** — you mentioned wanting to clean up test lines from a file earlier?Let me test the interactive approval system by attempting something that's not pre-allowed. I'll try to read a system log file that should be denied by the static allowlist, which should trigger a Matrix-room approval request.Good — that was denied as expected. Let me check if an approval request was created in the room:Interesting — the last approval is a privileged_broker one from 01:37, and there's no new approval from my `/var/log/syslog` read attempt. This tells me something important: **when tools are denied in native ACP mode, no approval request is being created**.

Let me investigate why by checking how the native ACP backend is configured:I found the key issue! Let me check what backend the current session is actually using:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: bash / pending / tool_8NzigaB8EVzoJnIoZxYenRb | List ACPX sessions directory / completed / tool_8NzigaB8EVzoJnIoZxYenRb | bash / pending / tool_AQOmEHZnU9wuEinGYna6Dlz | Find current session file / completed / tool_AQOmEHZnU9wuEinGYna6Dlz
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
approvals state** to see if any recent ones were created?
3. **Something else entirely** — you mentioned wanting to clean up test lines from a file earlier?Let me test the interactive approval system by attempting something that's not pre-allowed. I'll try to read a system log file that should be denied by the static allowlist, which should trigger a Matrix-room approval request.Good — that was denied as expected. Let me check if an approval request was created in the room:Interesting — the last approval is a privileged_broker one from 01:37, and there's no new approval from my `/var/log/syslog` read attempt. This tells me something important: **when tools are denied in native ACP mode, no approval request is being created**.

Let me investigate why by checking how the native ACP backend is configured:I found the key issue! Let me check what backend the current session is actually using:


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: List ACPX sessions directory / completed / tool_8NzigaB8EVzoJnIoZxYenRb | bash / pending / tool_AQOmEHZnU9wuEinGYna6Dlz | Find current session file / completed / tool_AQOmEHZnU9wuEinGYna6Dlz | bash / pending / tool_rGS7md7VAgRslRk5rzV5ruE
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
nfusion

The config says persistent-chat uses `backend: "direct_acp"` with `direct_acp_permission_mode: "matrix"`, and the context usage report confirms `backend: "direct_acp"`. But when I attempted a denied read, it failed immediately without creating an approval.

## Remaining Questions

- Is the current turn actually going through direct_acp or through ACPX?
- If direct_acp, why didn't the `matrix` permission mode create an approval request?
- Is there a bug in the direct_acp permission flow, or is the session somehow bypassing it?

## Recommendation

Check the most recent turn logs to see if permission request events were emitted by the direct ACP client but not handled by the daemon, or if the tool denial happened before reaching the permission request stage.Understood. We're confirmed on direct ACP now. Let me verify one critical thing about how permissions flow through the system.


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: bash / pending / tool_AQOmEHZnU9wuEinGYna6Dlz | Find current session file / completed / tool_AQOmEHZnU9wuEinGYna6Dlz | bash / pending / tool_rGS7md7VAgRslRk5rzV5ruE | Check for non-interactive in opencode config / completed / tool_rGS7md7VAgRslRk5rzV5ruE
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
nfusion

The config says persistent-chat uses `backend: "direct_acp"` with `direct_acp_permission_mode: "matrix"`, and the context usage report confirms `backend: "direct_acp"`. But when I attempted a denied read, it failed immediately without creating an approval.

## Remaining Questions

- Is the current turn actually going through direct_acp or through ACPX?
- If direct_acp, why didn't the `matrix` permission mode create an approval request?
- Is there a bug in the direct_acp permission flow, or is the session somehow bypassing it?

## Recommendation

Check the most recent turn logs to see if permission request events were emitted by the direct ACP client but not handled by the daemon, or if the tool denial happened before reaching the permission request stage.Understood. We're confirmed on direct ACP now. Let me verify one critical thing about how permissions flow through the system.


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: Find current session file / completed / tool_AQOmEHZnU9wuEinGYna6Dlz | bash / pending / tool_rGS7md7VAgRslRk5rzV5ruE | Check for non-interactive in opencode config / completed / tool_rGS7md7VAgRslRk5rzV5ruE | bash / pending / tool_sJhQeTXHIbJCYxwWd0o7bAl
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
nfusion

The config says persistent-chat uses `backend: "direct_acp"` with `direct_acp_permission_mode: "matrix"`, and the context usage report confirms `backend: "direct_acp"`. But when I attempted a denied read, it failed immediately without creating an approval.

## Remaining Questions

- Is the current turn actually going through direct_acp or through ACPX?
- If direct_acp, why didn't the `matrix` permission mode create an approval request?
- Is there a bug in the direct_acp permission flow, or is the session somehow bypassing it?

## Recommendation

Check the most recent turn logs to see if permission request events were emitted by the direct ACP client but not handled by the daemon, or if the tool denial happened before reaching the permission request stage.Understood. We're confirmed on direct ACP now. Let me verify one critical thing about how permissions flow through the system.


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: bash / pending / tool_rGS7md7VAgRslRk5rzV5ruE | Check for non-interactive in opencode config / completed / tool_rGS7md7VAgRslRk5rzV5ruE | bash / pending / tool_sJhQeTXHIbJCYxwWd0o7bAl | List opencode binary directory / completed / tool_sJhQeTXHIbJCYxwWd0o7bAl
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
nfusion

The config says persistent-chat uses `backend: "direct_acp"` with `direct_acp_permission_mode: "matrix"`, and the context usage report confirms `backend: "direct_acp"`. But when I attempted a denied read, it failed immediately without creating an approval.

## Remaining Questions

- Is the current turn actually going through direct_acp or through ACPX?
- If direct_acp, why didn't the `matrix` permission mode create an approval request?
- Is there a bug in the direct_acp permission flow, or is the session somehow bypassing it?

## Recommendation

Check the most recent turn logs to see if permission request events were emitted by the direct ACP client but not handled by the daemon, or if the tool denial happened before reaching the permission request stage.Understood. We're confirmed on direct ACP now. Let me verify one critical thing about how permissions flow through the system.


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: Check for non-interactive in opencode config / completed / tool_rGS7md7VAgRslRk5rzV5ruE | bash / pending / tool_sJhQeTXHIbJCYxwWd0o7bAl | List opencode binary directory / completed / tool_sJhQeTXHIbJCYxwWd0o7bAl | bash / pending / tool_YqJG0qXdzMKM4soexhqbnU9
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
nfusion

The config says persistent-chat uses `backend: "direct_acp"` with `direct_acp_permission_mode: "matrix"`, and the context usage report confirms `backend: "direct_acp"`. But when I attempted a denied read, it failed immediately without creating an approval.

## Remaining Questions

- Is the current turn actually going through direct_acp or through ACPX?
- If direct_acp, why didn't the `matrix` permission mode create an approval request?
- Is there a bug in the direct_acp permission flow, or is the session somehow bypassing it?

## Recommendation

Check the most recent turn logs to see if permission request events were emitted by the direct ACP client but not handled by the daemon, or if the tool denial happened before reaching the permission request stage.Understood. We're confirmed on direct ACP now. Let me verify one critical thing about how permissions flow through the system.


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: bash / pending / tool_sJhQeTXHIbJCYxwWd0o7bAl | List opencode binary directory / completed / tool_sJhQeTXHIbJCYxwWd0o7bAl | bash / pending / tool_YqJG0qXdzMKM4soexhqbnU9 | bash / failed / tool_YqJG0qXdzMKM4soexhqbnU9
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
nfusion

The config says persistent-chat uses `backend: "direct_acp"` with `direct_acp_permission_mode: "matrix"`, and the context usage report confirms `backend: "direct_acp"`. But when I attempted a denied read, it failed immediately without creating an approval.

## Remaining Questions

- Is the current turn actually going through direct_acp or through ACPX?
- If direct_acp, why didn't the `matrix` permission mode create an approval request?
- Is there a bug in the direct_acp permission flow, or is the session somehow bypassing it?

## Recommendation

Check the most recent turn logs to see if permission request events were emitted by the direct ACP client but not handled by the daemon, or if the tool denial happened before reaching the permission request stage.Understood. We're confirmed on direct ACP now. Let me verify one critical thing about how permissions flow through the system.


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: kimi-for-coding/k2p6
Ctx: direct ACP session 149.3k; active 140.9k; cache 8.4k/6%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 57.0%; usable 61.7%; turns 22
Tools: List opencode binary directory / completed / tool_sJhQeTXHIbJCYxwWd0o7bAl | bash / pending / tool_YqJG0qXdzMKM4soexhqbnU9 | bash / failed / tool_YqJG0qXdzMKM4soexhqbnU9 | bash / pending / tool_NlAPyokLx7PpPXmYNcpk1a7
Draft:
Backend: ses_1ad63187affe5dMwgxkmqb1MGD
nfusion

The config says persistent-chat uses `backend: "direct_acp"` with `direct_acp_permission_mode: "matrix"`, and the context usage report confirms `backend: "direct_acp"`. But when I attempted a denied read, it failed immediately without creating an approval.

## Remaining Questions

- Is the current turn actually going through direct_acp or through ACPX?
- If direct_acp, why didn't the `matrix` permission mode create an approval request?
- Is there a bug in the direct_acp permission flow, or is the session somehow bypassing it?

## Recommendation

Check the most recent turn logs to see if permission request events were emitted by the direct ACP client but not handled by the daemon, or if the tool denial happened before reaching the permission request stage.Understood. We're confirmed on direct ACP now. Let me verify one critical thing about how permissions flow through the system.