* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1033.3s
Time: model 1031.3s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1038.9s
Time: model 1036.8s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1044.5s
Time: model 1042.4s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1050.2s
Time: model 1048.1s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1056.1s
Time: model 1054.0s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1061.6s
Time: model 1059.6s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1067.2s
Time: model 1065.1s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1072.8s
Time: model 1070.7s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1078.4s
Time: model 1076.3s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1084.0s
Time: model 1081.9s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1089.7s
Time: model 1087.6s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1095.2s
Time: model 1093.1s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1100.8s
Time: model 1098.7s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1106.4s
Time: model 1104.3s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1111.9s
Time: model 1109.8s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1117.7s
Time: model 1115.7s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1123.4s
Time: model 1121.3s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1128.9s
Time: model 1126.9s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1134.5s
Time: model 1132.4s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1140.1s
Time: model 1138.0s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1145.7s
Time: model 1143.6s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1151.3s
Time: model 1149.2s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1156.9s
Time: model 1154.8s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1162.5s
Time: model 1160.4s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1168.0s
Time: model 1166.0s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1173.6s
Time: model 1171.5s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1179.4s
Time: model 1177.3s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1185.0s
Time: model 1182.9s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1190.5s
Time: model 1188.5s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1196.1s
Time: model 1194.0s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1201.7s
Time: model 1199.6s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1207.5s
Time: model 1205.5s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1213.1s
Time: model 1211.0s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1218.6s
Time: model 1216.6s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1224.2s
Time: model 1222.1s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1229.8s
Time: model 1227.7s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1235.3s
Time: model 1233.3s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1241.1s
Time: model 1239.0s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1246.7s
Time: model 1244.6s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1252.3s
Time: model 1250.2s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1257.9s
Time: model 1255.8s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1263.5s
Time: model 1261.4s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1269.1s
Time: model 1267.0s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1274.7s
Time: model 1272.6s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1280.2s
Time: model 1278.1s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1285.8s
Time: model 1283.7s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1291.4s
Time: model 1289.3s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1297.0s
Time: model 1294.9s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1302.8s
Time: model 1300.7s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1308.4s
Time: model 1306.4s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1314.1s
Time: model 1312.0s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1319.9s
Time: model 1317.8s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1325.6s
Time: model 1323.5s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1331.4s
Time: model 1329.3s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Not


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Not through the **normal conversation-log cursor**, no.

What seems to be happening is:

- **yes, we had conversation yesterday and today**
- **yes, some state files changed**
  - `curator-journal.md` updated
  - `curated-memory.md` updated
- but the **semantic-memory cursor** still says:
  - `processed_model_conversation_entries: 2792`
- and `model-conversation-log.jsonl` still has only **2792** lines, ending at **2026-05-24T19:23Z**

So the distinction is:

### What is working
- manual/source-artifact updates
- some background outputs
- our direct backlog curation edits

### What still looks broken
- the **normal “read new conversation lines and advance the reviewed cursor” path**
- that still appears stuck at the old end of `model-conversation-log.jsonl`

So my answer is:

- **


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1337.4s
Time: model 1335.3s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Not through the **normal conversation-log cursor**, no.

What seems to be happening is:

- **yes, we had conversation yesterday and today**
- **yes, some state files changed**
  - `curator-journal.md` updated
  - `curated-memory.md` updated
- but the **semantic-memory cursor** still says:
  - `processed_model_conversation_entries: 2792`
- and `model-conversation-log.jsonl` still has only **2792** lines, ending at **2026-05-24T19:23Z**

So the distinction is:

### What is working
- manual/source-artifact updates
- some background outputs
- our direct backlog curation edits

### What still looks broken
- the **normal “read new conversation lines and advance the reviewed cursor” path**
- that still appears stuck at the old end of `model-conversation-log.jsonl`

So my answer is:

- **it is picking up some things indirectly / manually**
- but **it does not look like the proper conversation-log review pipeline has resumed**
- otherwise that cursor and log tail would have moved past 2026-05-24

So the fix seems **partial**, not complete.


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1339.0s
Time: model 1336.9s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 638.6k o 257 t 178 est $1.603; p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 672.8k; active 40.5k; cache 632.3k/94%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


Not through the **normal conversation-log cursor**, no.

What seems to be happening is:

- **yes, we had conversation yesterday and today**
- **yes, some state files changed**
  - `curator-journal.md` updated
  - `curated-memory.md` updated
- but the **semantic-memory cursor** still says:
  - `processed_model_conversation_entries: 2792`
- and `model-conversation-log.jsonl` still has only **2792** lines, ending at **2026-05-24T19:23Z**

So the distinction is:

### What is working
- manual/source-artifact updates
- some background outputs
- our direct backlog curation edits

### What still looks broken
- the **normal “read new conversation lines and advance the reviewed cursor” path**
- that still appears stuck at the old end of `model-conversation-log.jsonl`

So my answer is:

- **it is picking up some things indirectly / manually**
- but **it does not look like the proper conversation-log review pipeline has resumed**
- otherwise that cursor and log tail would have moved past 2026-05-24

So the fix seems **partial**, not complete.


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1340.0s
Time: model 1336.9s, overhead 3.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 638.6k o 257 t 178 est $1.603; p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 639.0k; active 639.0k; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


Can you review the lines and update your background agents so they know the conversation is not stopping?


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 639.0k; active 639.0k; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 639.0k; active 639.0k; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 639.0k; active 639.0k; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 2.0s
Time: overhead 2.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.6ktok/14.5kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 639.0k; active 639.0k; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 147


📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Waiting for first model/tool update…


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 8.1s
Time: model 5.0s, overhead 2.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.6ktok/14.5kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 639.0k; active 639.0k; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 148


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 13.8s
Time: model 10.7s, overhead 2.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.6ktok/14.5kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 639.0k; active 639.0k; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 148


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (1):
- todowrite / pending / call_ho6YZoAxykWj5K3RRXISfV7


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 19.3s
Time: model 16.2s, overhead 2.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.6ktok/14.5kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 639.0k; active 639.0k; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 148


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 25.0s
Time: model 21.9s, overhead 2.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.6ktok/14.5kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 639.0k; active 639.0k; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 148


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (2):
- 4 todos / completed / call_ho6YZoAxykWj5K3RRXISfV7
- grep / pending / call_0Dafqyet5kCi9Mqq0tzbtbk


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 30.6s
Time: model 27.5s, overhead 2.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.6ktok/14.5kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 639.0k; active 639.0k; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 148


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 36.3s
Time: model 33.2s, overhead 2.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.6ktok/14.5kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 639.0k; active 639.0k; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 148


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 42.1s
Time: model 39.0s, overhead 2.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.6ktok/14.5kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 639.0k; active 639.0k; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 148


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 47.7s
Time: model 44.6s, overhead 2.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.6ktok/14.5kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 639.0k; active 639.0k; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 148


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (4):
- 4 todos / completed / call_ho6YZoAxykWj5K3RRXISfV7
- curator-journal|model-conversation-log|processed_model_conversation_entries|No n / completed / /home/matrix-lite/app/scripts
- ../../app/scripts/persistent-chat-model-heartbeat / completed / /home/matrix-lite/app/scripts/persistent-chat-model-heartbeat
- ../../app/scripts/persistent-chat-reflection / completed / /home/matrix-lite/app/scripts/persistent-chat-reflection


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 53.5s
Time: model 50.4s, overhead 2.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.6ktok/14.5kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 639.0k; active 639.0k; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 148


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (4):
- 4 todos / completed / call_ho6YZoAxykWj5K3RRXISfV7
- curator-journal|model-conversation-log|processed_model_conversation_entries|No n / completed / /home/matrix-lite/app/scripts
- ../../app/scripts/persistent-chat-model-heartbeat / completed / /home/matrix-lite/app/scripts/persistent-chat-model-heartbeat
- ../../app/scripts/persistent-chat-reflection / completed / /home/matrix-lite/app/scripts/persistent-chat-reflection

Draft:
No — not in the way it should.

What I found is worse than just “it missed a few lines”:

- `semantic-memory.json` still says:
  - `processed_model_conversation_entries: 2792`
- `model-conversation-log.jsonl` still ends at line **2792**
- so the **normal conversation-aware cursor is still stuck**

And separately, in `perpetual-log.jsonl` / `curator-journal.md`, the background curation turns are still logging things like:
- “No new user messages since ~2026-05-25T09:54Z”

So the curation loop is still operating on a stale notion of where the real chat stopped.

More specifically:
- the background agent **is running**
- it **is appending journal entries**
- but it is **not advancing the real conversation-review cursor**

And there’s another


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 59.0s
Time: model 55.9s, overhead 2.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.6ktok/14.5kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 639.0k; active 639.0k; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 148


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (4):
- 4 todos / completed / call_ho6YZoAxykWj5K3RRXISfV7
- curator-journal|model-conversation-log|processed_model_conversation_entries|No n / completed / /home/matrix-lite/app/scripts
- ../../app/scripts/persistent-chat-model-heartbeat / completed / /home/matrix-lite/app/scripts/persistent-chat-model-heartbeat
- ../../app/scripts/persistent-chat-reflection / completed / /home/matrix-lite/app/scripts/persistent-chat-reflection

Draft:
No — not in the way it should.

What I found is worse than just “it missed a few lines”:

- `semantic-memory.json` still says:
  - `processed_model_conversation_entries: 2792`
- `model-conversation-log.jsonl` still ends at line **2792**
- so the **normal conversation-aware cursor is still stuck**

And separately, in `perpetual-log.jsonl` / `curator-journal.md`, the background curation turns are still logging things like:
- “No new user messages since ~2026-05-25T09:54Z”

So the curation loop is still operating on a stale notion of where the real chat stopped.

More specifically:
- the background agent **is running**
- it **is appending journal entries**
- but it is **not advancing the real conversation-review cursor**

And there’s another ugly detail:
- those hourly curator prompts themselves are present in the logs as `role: user` maintenance messages
- so the logs are getting maintenance traffic, but not the actual main-chat review state advanced correctly

So the answer is:

- **No, the proper “review new conversation lines” path is still not fixed**
- what’s working is mostly:
  - maintenance turns
  - journal appends
  - our manual/source edits
- what’s still broken is:
  - **the canonical reviewed-conversation cursor**

That means the background agents still need to be told explicitly that:
- the conversation did **not** stop
- their “


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (18):
- Success. Updated the following files:
M ../../state/persistent-chat/curated-memo / completed / call_lRWf89GGkO3bm646qdSxJiA
- Marks three high-value memory candidates as promoted / completed / Marks three high-value memory candidates as promoted
- slightly longer responses|know how long|don't mind waiting|messages are slightly / completed / /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/curated-memory.md
- ../../state/persistent-chat/memory-candidates.jsonl / completed / /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/memory-candidates.jsonl
- ../../state/persistent-chat/curated-memory.md / completed / /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/curated-memory.md
- slightly longer responses|don.t mind waiting|formatting and truncation|lightweig / completed / /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/curated-memory.md
- ../../state/persistent-chat/memory-candidates.jsonl / completed / /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/memory-candidates.jsonl
- ../../state/persistent-chat/memory-candidates.jsonl / completed / /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/memory-candidates.jsonl
- slightly longer responses|slightly longer|don't mind waiting|know how long|forma / completed / /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/curated-memory.md
- ../../state/persistent-chat/curated-memory.md / completed / /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/curated-memory.md
- ../../state/persistent-chat/memory-candidates.jsonl / completed / /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/memory-candidates.jsonl
- slightly longer responses|Munich landkreis|No washing machine|formatting and tru / completed / slightly longer responses|Munich landkreis|No washing machine|formatting and truncation|don't mind waiting|observability and debugging problem|search logs or semantic/lexical memory in /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/curated-memory.
- 3 todos / completed / call_MjFOKtKfcC2x1gCYdplZQui
- ../../state/persistent-chat/knowledge-base.jsonl / completed / /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/knowledge-base.jsonl
- ../../state/persistent-chat/curated-memory.md / completed / /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/curated-memory.md
- Lists remaining candidate memory items / completed / Lists remaining candidate memory items
- 3 todos / completed / call_IyzNsnsZcHNXAB4tmCODpKD
- ../../state/persistent-chat/decision-state.json / completed / /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/decision-state.json

Draft:
No — not in the way it should.

What I found is worse than just “it missed a few lines”:

- `semantic-memory.json` still says:
  - `processed_model_conversation_entries: 2792`
- `model-conversation-log.jsonl` still ends at line **2792**
- so the **normal conversation-aware cursor is still stuck**

And separately, in `perpetual-log.jsonl` / `curator-journal.md`, the background curation turns are still logging things like:
- “No new user messages since ~2026-05-25T09:54Z”

So the curation loop is still operating on a stale notion of where the real chat stopped.

More specifically:
- the background agent **is running**
- it **is appending journal entries**
- but it is **not advancing the real conversation-review cursor**

And there’s another ugly detail:
- those hourly curator prompts themselves are present in the logs as `role: user` maintenance messages
- so the logs are getting maintenance traffic, but not the actual main-chat review state advanced correctly

So the answer is:

- **No, the proper “review new conversation lines” path is still not fixed**
- what’s working is mostly:
  - maintenance turns
  - journal appends
  - our manual/source edits
- what’s still broken is:
  - **the canonical reviewed-conversation cursor**

That means the background agents still need to be told explicitly that:
- the conversation did **not** stop
- their “no new user messages” assumption is false
- they nee


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 63.5s
Time: model 60.4s, overhead 2.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 128 o 352 t 208 cache 648.7k/100% est $0.0087; p≈3.6ktok/14.5kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 639.0k; active 639.0k; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 148


No — not in the way it should.

What I found is worse than just “it missed a few lines”:

- `semantic-memory.json` still says:
  - `processed_model_conversation_entries: 2792`
- `model-conversation-log.jsonl` still ends at line **2792**
- so the **normal conversation-aware cursor is still stuck**

And separately, in `perpetual-log.jsonl` / `curator-journal.md`, the background curation turns are still logging things like:
- “No new user messages since ~2026-05-25T09:54Z”

So the curation loop is still operating on a stale notion of where the real chat stopped.

More specifically:
- the background agent **is running**
- it **is appending journal entries**
- but it is **not advancing the real conversation-review cursor**

And there’s another ugly detail:
- those hourly curator prompts themselves are present in the logs as `role: user` maintenance messages
- so the logs are getting maintenance traffic, but not the actual main-chat review state advanced correctly

So the answer is:

- **No, the proper “review new conversation lines” path is still not fixed**
- what’s working is mostly:
  - maintenance turns
  - journal appends
  - our manual/source edits
- what’s still broken is:
  - **the canonical reviewed-conversation cursor**

That means the background agents still need to be told explicitly that:
- the conversation did **not** stop
- their “no new user messages” assumption is false
- they need to rebase on a different source/cursor or manually review backlog until that path is repaired.


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 64.3s
Time: model 60.4s, overhead 3.9s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 128 o 352 t 208 cache 648.7k/100% est $0.0087; p≈3.6ktok/14.5kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 649.4k; active 688; cache 648.7k/100%; p≈3.6ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 148


Yes I understand. Can you do it from here?


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 649.4k; active 688; cache 648.7k/100%; p≈3.6ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 148


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 649.4k; active 688; cache 648.7k/100%; p≈3.6ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 148


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.8s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 649.4k; active 688; cache 648.7k/100%; p≈3.6ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 148


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.6s
Time: overhead 1.6s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.3ktok/13.3kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 649.4k; active 688; cache 648.7k/100%; p≈3.6ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 148


📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Waiting for first model/tool update…


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 7.1s
Time: model 5.0s, overhead 1.6s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.3ktok/13.3kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 649.4k; active 688; cache 648.7k/100%; p≈3.6ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 149


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 12.8s
Time: model 10.7s, overhead 1.6s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.3ktok/13.3kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 649.4k; active 688; cache 648.7k/100%; p≈3.6ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 149


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Yes


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 18.3s
Time: model 16.2s, overhead 1.6s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.3ktok/13.3kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 649.4k; active 688; cache 648.7k/100%; p≈3.6ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 149


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Yes.

From here I can at least do the **practical mitigation**, even if I don’t yet fix the underlying cursor bug itself.

Concretely, I can:
- update **source artifacts** the background agents already read
- append a **curator-journal** note saying the conversation is ongoing and the “no new user messages” assumption is false
- add a compact **operational notice/finding** so synthesis/heartbeat stop reasoning from stale silence
- if needed, update **decision-state / todo** with a temporary operational truth:
  - conversation continues past the stuck cursor
  - backlog review must not assume inactivity

What I probably **can’t** fully solve from here without more code work is:
- the actual broken cursor advancement in the normal conversation-log pipeline

So:
- **mitigation from here:** yes
- **root fix from here:** maybe, but that’s a separate code/debug task

If you want, I can do the mitigation now.


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 19.2s
Time: model 17.1s, overhead 1.6s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 34.7k o 206 t 84 cache 524.8k/94% est $0.0911; p≈3.3ktok/13.3kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 649.4k; active 688; cache 648.7k/100%; p≈3.6ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 149


Yes.

From here I can at least do the **practical mitigation**, even if I don’t yet fix the underlying cursor bug itself.

Concretely, I can:
- update **source artifacts** the background agents already read
- append a **curator-journal** note saying the conversation is ongoing and the “no new user messages” assumption is false
- add a compact **operational notice/finding** so synthesis/heartbeat stop reasoning from stale silence
- if needed, update **decision-state / todo** with a temporary operational truth:
  - conversation continues past the stuck cursor
  - backlog review must not assume inactivity

What I probably **can’t** fully solve from here without more code work is:
- the actual broken cursor advancement in the normal conversation-log pipeline

So:
- **mitigation from here:** yes
- **root fix from here:** maybe, but that’s a separate code/debug task

If you want, I can do the mitigation now.


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 19.7s
Time: model 17.1s, overhead 2.6s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 34.7k o 206 t 84 cache 524.8k/94% est $0.0911; p≈3.3ktok/13.3kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 559.8k; active 35.0k; cache 524.8k/94%; p≈3.3ktok; ctx 64.1%; usable 73.0%; observed turns 118; actual turns 149


Nah, we need to fix it. Can you tell me what exactly is the problem and why can't you fix the root cause?


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 559.8k; active 35.0k; cache 524.8k/94%; p≈3.3ktok; ctx 53.3%; usable 60.7%; observed turns 121; actual turns 149


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 559.8k; active 35.0k; cache 524.8k/94%; p≈3.3ktok; ctx 53.3%; usable 60.7%; observed turns 121; actual turns 149


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.8s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 559.8k; active 35.0k; cache 524.8k/94%; p≈3.3ktok; ctx 53.3%; usable 60.7%; observed turns 121; actual turns 149


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.3s
Time: overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 559.8k; active 35.0k; cache 524.8k/94%; p≈3.3ktok; ctx 53.3%; usable 60.7%; observed turns 121; actual turns 149


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 7.0s
Time: model 5.0s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 559.8k; active 35.0k; cache 524.8k/94%; p≈3.3ktok; ctx 53.3%; usable 60.7%; observed turns 121; actual turns 150


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 12.6s
Time: model 10.7s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 559.8k; active 35.0k; cache 524.8k/94%; p≈3.3ktok; ctx 53.3%; usable 60.7%; observed turns 121; actual turns 150


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 18.2s
Time: model 16.3s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 559.8k; active 35.0k; cache 524.8k/94%; p≈3.3ktok; ctx 53.3%; usable 60.7%; observed turns 121; actual turns 150


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Yes.

The **exact problem** is:

- the curator’s normal review pipeline depends on **`model-conversation-log.jsonl`**
- its cursor in **`semantic-memory.json`** is stuck at:
  - `processed_model_conversation_entries = 2792`
- and **`model-conversation-log.jsonl` itself also stops at 2792**
- so the curator is not merely “failing to catch up” — its **input stream is stale**
- background agents then reason from that stale input and conclude things like:
  - “no new user messages since …”

So the root issue is not really “the curator forgot.”
It’s:

**the conversation-log production/advance path feeding the curator is broken or bypassed.**

Why I **can’t yet fix the root cause** right this second:
1. I know **where the symptom appears**
   - stale cursor
   - stale conversation log
2. But I have **not yet traced the full writer path**
   - what process is supposed to append to `


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Yes.

The **exact problem** is:

- the curator’s normal review pipeline depends on **`model-conversation-log.jsonl`**
- its cursor in **`semantic-memory.json`** is stuck at:
  - `processed_model_conversation_entries = 2792`
- and **`model-conversation-log.jsonl` itself also stops at 2792**
- so the curator is not merely “failing to catch up” — its **input stream is stale**
- background agents then reason from that stale input and conclude things like:
  - “no new user messages since …”

So the root issue is not really “the curator forgot.”
It’s:

**the conversation-log production/advance path feeding the curator is broken or bypassed.**

Why I **can’t yet fix the root cause** right this second:
1. I know **where the symptom appears**
   - stale cursor
   - stale conversation log
2. But I have **not yet traced the full writer path**
   - what process is supposed to append to `model-conversation-log.jsonl`
   - when it runs
   - what conditions suppress it
   - whether direct ACP changed the path and left this writer behind
3. So if I claimed a root-cause fix now, I’d be guessing

More bluntly:
- I can diagnose the **broken interface**
- I have **not yet isolated the exact broken component**

Likely failure classes are:
- the writer that should append user/assistant turns into `model-conversation-log.jsonl` is no longer being called under direct ACP
- or it is gated on an old session/event path that no longer fires
- or it is writing elsewhere and the curator is still reading the old file

So the honest answer is:

- **Exact problem:** stale `model-conversation-log` feed,


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 23.8s
Time: model 21.8s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 559.8k; active 35.0k; cache 524.8k/94%; p≈3.3ktok; ctx 53.3%; usable 60.7%; observed turns 121; actual turns 150


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Yes.

The **exact problem** is:

- the curator’s normal review pipeline depends on **`model-conversation-log.jsonl`**
- its cursor in **`semantic-memory.json`** is stuck at:
  - `processed_model_conversation_entries = 2792`
- and **`model-conversation-log.jsonl` itself also stops at 2792**
- so the curator is not merely “failing to catch up” — its **input stream is stale**
- background agents then reason from that stale input and conclude things like:
  - “no new user messages since …”

So the root issue is not really “the curator forgot.”
It’s:

**the conversation-log production/advance path feeding the curator is broken or bypassed.**

Why I **can’t yet fix the root cause** right this second:
1. I know **where the symptom appears**
   - stale cursor
   - stale conversation log
2. But I have **not yet traced the full writer path**
   - what process is supposed to append to `model-conversation-log.jsonl`
   - when it runs
   - what conditions suppress it
   - whether direct ACP changed the path and left this writer behind
3. So if I claimed a root-cause fix now, I’d be guessing

More bluntly:
- I can diagnose the **broken interface**
- I have **not yet isolated the exact broken component**

Likely failure classes are:
- the writer that should append user/assistant turns into `model-conversation-log.jsonl` is no longer being called under direct ACP
- or it is gated on an old session/event path that no longer fires
- or it is writing elsewhere and the curator is still reading the old file

So the honest answer is:

- **Exact problem:** stale `model-conversation-log` feed, therefore stale curator input
- **Why not fixed yet:** I haven’t completed the end-to-end source trace of the writer path, so I don’t yet know which component to patch without guessing

If you want, the next correct step is:
- inspect the code path that writes `model-conversation-log.jsonl`
- verify whether direct ACP still invokes it
- then patch either the writer or the curator input source accordingly.


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 26.6s
Time: model 24.6s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 3.9k o 471 t 226 cache 559.1k/99% est $0.0202; p≈3.5ktok/14.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 559.8k; active 35.0k; cache 524.8k/94%; p≈3.3ktok; ctx 53.3%; usable 60.7%; observed turns 121; actual turns 150


Yes.

The **exact problem** is:

- the curator’s normal review pipeline depends on **`model-conversation-log.jsonl`**
- its cursor in **`semantic-memory.json`** is stuck at:
  - `processed_model_conversation_entries = 2792`
- and **`model-conversation-log.jsonl` itself also stops at 2792**
- so the curator is not merely “failing to catch up” — its **input stream is stale**
- background agents then reason from that stale input and conclude things like:
  - “no new user messages since …”

So the root issue is not really “the curator forgot.”
It’s:

**the conversation-log production/advance path feeding the curator is broken or bypassed.**

Why I **can’t yet fix the root cause** right this second:
1. I know **where the symptom appears**
   - stale cursor
   - stale conversation log
2. But I have **not yet traced the full writer path**
   - what process is supposed to append to `model-conversation-log.jsonl`
   - when it runs
   - what conditions suppress it
   - whether direct ACP changed the path and left this writer behind
3. So if I claimed a root-cause fix now, I’d be guessing

More bluntly:
- I can diagnose the **broken interface**
- I have **not yet isolated the exact broken component**

Likely failure classes are:
- the writer that should append user/assistant turns into `model-conversation-log.jsonl` is no longer being called under direct ACP
- or it is gated on an old session/event path that no longer fires
- or it is writing elsewhere and the curator is still reading the old file

So the honest answer is:

- **Exact problem:** stale `model-conversation-log` feed, therefore stale curator input
- **Why not fixed yet:** I haven’t completed the end-to-end source trace of the writer path, so I don’t yet know which component to patch without guessing

If you want, the next correct step is:
- inspect the code path that writes `model-conversation-log.jsonl`
- verify whether direct ACP still invokes it
- then patch either the writer or the curator input source accordingly.


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 27.2s
Time: model 24.6s, overhead 2.6s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 3.9k o 471 t 226 cache 559.1k/99% est $0.0202; p≈3.5ktok/14.2kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 563.7k; active 4.6k; cache 559.1k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 53.3%; usable 60.7%; observed turns 121; actual turns 150


Yes you were right when you mentioned that acp approach changed the path. This should be fixed now please check. Do we need to review the backlog now?


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 563.7k; active 4.6k; cache 559.1k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 53.7%; usable 61.1%; observed turns 122; actual turns 150


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 563.7k; active 4.6k; cache 559.1k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 53.7%; usable 61.1%; observed turns 122; actual turns 150


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.7s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 563.7k; active 4.6k; cache 559.1k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 53.7%; usable 61.1%; observed turns 122; actual turns 150


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.3s
Time: overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 563.7k; active 4.6k; cache 559.1k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 53.7%; usable 61.1%; observed turns 122; actual turns 150


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 7.0s
Time: model 5.0s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 563.7k; active 4.6k; cache 559.1k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 53.7%; usable 61.1%; observed turns 122; actual turns 150


📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Waiting for first model/tool update…


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 12.9s
Time: model 10.8s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 563.7k; active 4.6k; cache 559.1k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 53.7%; usable 61.1%; observed turns 122; actual turns 151


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (1):
- todowrite / pending / call_8qaJ9sQIjUzjAgh85vOTMiu


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 18.4s
Time: model 16.4s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 563.7k; active 4.6k; cache 559.1k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 53.7%; usable 61.1%; observed turns 122; actual turns 151


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 23.8s
Time: model 21.8s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 563.7k; active 4.6k; cache 559.1k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 53.7%; usable 61.1%; observed turns 122; actual turns 151


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 29.4s
Time: model 27.4s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 563.7k; active 4.6k; cache 559.1k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 53.7%; usable 61.1%; observed turns 122; actual turns 151


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 35.0s
Time: model 32.9s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 563.7k; active 4.6k; cache 559.1k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 53.7%; usable 61.1%; observed turns 122; actual turns 151


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (2):
- 3 todos / completed / call_8qaJ9sQIjUzjAgh85vOTMiu
- read / pending / call_iKTpm1JANvuPRb3qEfdQ3G4


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 40.5s
Time: model 38.5s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 563.7k; active 4.6k; cache 559.1k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 53.7%; usable 61.1%; observed turns 122; actual turns 151


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 46.0s
Time: model 44.0s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 563.7k; active 4.6k; cache 559.1k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 53.7%; usable 61.1%; observed turns 122; actual turns 151


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (4):
- 3 todos / completed / call_8qaJ9sQIjUzjAgh85vOTMiu
- ../../state/persistent-chat/semantic-memory.json / completed / /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/semantic-memory.json
- Counts conversation and perpetual log lines / completed / Counts conversation and perpetual log lines
- ../../state/persistent-chat/curator-journal.md / completed / /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/curator-journal.md

Draft:
Good


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 51.9s
Time: model 49.8s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 563.7k; active 4.6k; cache 559.1k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 53.7%; usable 61.1%; observed turns 122; actual turns 151


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (4):
- 3 todos / completed / call_8qaJ9sQIjUzjAgh85vOTMiu
- ../../state/persistent-chat/semantic-memory.json / completed / /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/semantic-memory.json
- Counts conversation and perpetual log lines / completed / Counts conversation and perpetual log lines
- ../../state/persistent-chat/curator-journal.md / completed / /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/curator-journal.md

Draft:
Good — that changed a lot.

It now looks like the **conversation-log writer path is fixed**:

- `semantic-memory.json` now shows:
  - `updated: 2026-05-27T10:06:18Z`
- `model-conversation-log.jsonl` now has:
  - **4770 lines**
- so the old hard stop at **2792** is gone

That means my earlier diagnosis was correct


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 57.4s
Time: model 55.3s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 563.7k; active 4.6k; cache 559.1k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 53.7%; usable 61.1%; observed turns 122; actual turns 151


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (4):
- 3 todos / completed / call_8qaJ9sQIjUzjAgh85vOTMiu
- ../../state/persistent-chat/semantic-memory.json / completed / /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/semantic-memory.json
- Counts conversation and perpetual log lines / completed / Counts conversation and perpetual log lines
- ../../state/persistent-chat/curator-journal.md / completed / /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/curator-journal.md

Draft:
Good — that changed a lot.

It now looks like the **conversation-log writer path is fixed**:

- `semantic-memory.json` now shows:
  - `updated: 2026-05-27T10:06:18Z`
- `model-conversation-log.jsonl` now has:
  - **4770 lines**
- so the old hard stop at **2792** is gone

That means my earlier diagnosis was correct:
- the ACP-direct path had broken or bypassed the writer
- and that writer path now seems to be flowing again

### But do we still need backlog review?
**Yes, probably.**

Because even though the writer resumed, the curator-journal still shows stale runs saying:
- `Log lines reviewed: 3790 (+0 since last run...)`
- `No new user messages since ~2026-05-25T09:54Z`

So the **writer** is fixed, but the **background curator’s notion of what it has reviewed** is still stale in those recent runs.

More concretely:
- `model-conversation-log.jsonl`: **4770**
- `perpetual-log.jsonl`: **3790**

That mismatch is interesting in itself:
- the conversation log is now **ahead** of perpetual log line count
- so at least one path is writing again
- but the curator-journal entries you showed were still produced from stale assumptions

### My practical conclusion
- **root writer path:** looks fixed
- **curator state / review continuity:** probably still needs a catch-up pass
- **backlog review:** yes, still needed, but now it can be treated as:
  - **catch-up / reconciliation**
  - not “the pipeline is completely dead”

So the answer is:
- **yes, we still need backlog


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (4):
- 3 todos / completed / call_8qaJ9sQIjUzjAgh85vOTMiu
- ../../state/persistent-chat/semantic-memory.json / completed / /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/semantic-memory.json
- Counts conversation and perpetual log lines / completed / Counts conversation and perpetual log lines
- ../../state/persistent-chat/curator-journal.md / completed / /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/curator-journal.md

Draft:
Good — that changed a lot.

It now looks like the **conversation-log writer path is fixed**:

- `semantic-memory.json` now shows:
  - `updated: 2026-05-27T10:06:18Z`
- `model-conversation-log.jsonl` now has:
  - **4770 lines**
- so the old hard stop at **2792** is gone

That means my earlier diagnosis was correct:
- the ACP-direct path had broken or bypassed the writer
- and that writer path now seems to be flowing again

### But do we still need backlog review?
**Yes, probably.**

Because even though the writer resumed, the curator-journal still shows stale runs saying:
- `Log lines reviewed: 3790 (+0 since last run...)`
- `No new user messages since ~2026-05-25T09:54Z`

So the **writer** is fixed, but the **background curator’s notion of what it has reviewed** is still stale in those recent runs.

More concretely:
- `model-conversation-log.jsonl`: **4770**
- `perpetual-log.jsonl`: **3790**

That mismatch is interesting in itself:
- the conversation log is now **ahead** of perpetual log line count
- so at least one path is writing again
- but the curator-journal entries you showed were still produced from stale assumptions

### My practical conclusion
- **root writer path:** looks fixed
- **curator state / review continuity:** probably still needs a catch-up pass
- **backlog review:** yes, still needed, but now it can be treated as:
  - **catch-up / reconciliation**
  - not “the pipeline is completely dead”

So the answer is:
- **yes, we still need backlog review**
- but the situation is better than before, because the main input stream appears alive again.


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 59.9s
Time: model 57.9s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 4.0k o 396 cache 566.8k/99% est $0.0160; p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 563.7k; active 4.6k; cache 559.1k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 53.7%; usable 61.1%; observed turns 122; actual turns 151


Good — that changed a lot.

It now looks like the **conversation-log writer path is fixed**:

- `semantic-memory.json` now shows:
  - `updated: 2026-05-27T10:06:18Z`
- `model-conversation-log.jsonl` now has:
  - **4770 lines**
- so the old hard stop at **2792** is gone

That means my earlier diagnosis was correct:
- the ACP-direct path had broken or bypassed the writer
- and that writer path now seems to be flowing again

### But do we still need backlog review?
**Yes, probably.**

Because even though the writer resumed, the curator-journal still shows stale runs saying:
- `Log lines reviewed: 3790 (+0 since last run...)`
- `No new user messages since ~2026-05-25T09:54Z`

So the **writer** is fixed, but the **background curator’s notion of what it has reviewed** is still stale in those recent runs.

More concretely:
- `model-conversation-log.jsonl`: **4770**
- `perpetual-log.jsonl`: **3790**

That mismatch is interesting in itself:
- the conversation log is now **ahead** of perpetual log line count
- so at least one path is writing again
- but the curator-journal entries you showed were still produced from stale assumptions

### My practical conclusion
- **root writer path:** looks fixed
- **curator state / review continuity:** probably still needs a catch-up pass
- **backlog review:** yes, still needed, but now it can be treated as:
  - **catch-up / reconciliation**
  - not “the pipeline is completely dead”

So the answer is:
- **yes, we still need backlog review**
- but the situation is better than before, because the main input stream appears alive again.


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 60.9s
Time: model 57.9s, overhead 3.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 4.0k o 396 cache 566.8k/99% est $0.0160; p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 53.7%; usable 61.1%; observed turns 122; actual turns 151


Can you review the log lines and memories backlog? It's mostly coming from this long session so you have the best context for this.


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 53.7%; usable 61.1%; observed turns 122; actual turns 151


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 53.7%; usable 61.1%; observed turns 122; actual turns 151


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 53.7%; usable 61.1%; observed turns 122; actual turns 151


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.6s
Time: overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 53.7%; usable 61.1%; observed turns 122; actual turns 151


📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Waiting for first model/tool update…


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 7.2s
Time: model 5.0s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 53.7%; usable 61.1%; observed turns 122; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 12.8s
Time: model 10.6s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 53.7%; usable 61.1%; observed turns 122; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 18.5s
Time: model 16.3s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 53.7%; usable 61.1%; observed turns 122; actual turns 152


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (1):
- todowrite / pending / call_ytY4NYV9dSbjFEhO0fW87qJ


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 24.1s
Time: model 21.9s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 53.7%; usable 61.1%; observed turns 122; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 29.5s
Time: model 27.3s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 53.7%; usable 61.1%; observed turns 122; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 35.0s
Time: model 32.8s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 53.7%; usable 61.1%; observed turns 122; actual turns 152


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (2):
- 3 todos / completed / call_ytY4NYV9dSbjFEhO0fW87qJ
- bash / pending / call_wwLvDwP6omWYwya08Wc7BtF


🟠 Approval requested
Stage: same-room native ACP permission; active turn is waiting
Approval: dap-1779876902-perm-1779876902508-1
Summary: OpenCode requests bash for execute
Tool: bash
Kind: execute
Nearest active tool: Counts conversation and backlog lines / completed / Counts conversation and backlog lines
React ✅ allow once, ❌ deny. Not sudo/root.
Options: allow_once, reject_once


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 40.6s
Time: model 38.4s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 53.7%; usable 61.1%; observed turns 122; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 46.1s
Time: model 44.0s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 53.7%; usable 61.1%; observed turns 122; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 52.0s
Time: model 49.8s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 53.7%; usable 61.1%; observed turns 122; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 57.5s
Time: model 55.4s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 53.7%; usable 61.1%; observed turns 122; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 63.1s
Time: model 60.9s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 53.7%; usable 61.1%; observed turns 122; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 68.6s
Time: model 66.4s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 53.7%; usable 61.1%; observed turns 122; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 74.1s
Time: model 72.0s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 53.7%; usable 61.1%; observed turns 122; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 79.8s
Time: model 77.7s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 53.7%; usable 61.1%; observed turns 122; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 85.4s
Time: model 83.2s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 53.7%; usable 61.1%; observed turns 122; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 90.9s
Time: model 88.7s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 53.7%; usable 61.1%; observed turns 122; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 96.5s
Time: model 94.3s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 53.7%; usable 61.1%; observed turns 122; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 102.0s
Time: model 99.9s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 107.6s
Time: model 105.4s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 113.0s
Time: model 110.8s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 118.5s
Time: model 116.3s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 124.0s
Time: model 121.8s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 129.5s
Time: model 127.3s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 135.1s
Time: model 132.9s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 140.7s
Time: model 138.6s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 146.3s
Time: model 144.2s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 151.8s
Time: model 149.7s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 157.4s
Time: model 155.2s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 163.0s
Time: model 160.8s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 168.6s
Time: model 166.4s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 174.2s
Time: model 172.0s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 179.7s
Time: model 177.5s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 185.2s
Time: model 183.0s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 190.8s
Time: model 188.6s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 196.3s
Time: model 194.2s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 202.0s
Time: model 199.8s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 207.6s
Time: model 205.4s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 213.2s
Time: model 211.0s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 218.8s
Time: model 216.6s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 224.4s
Time: model 222.2s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 230.0s
Time: model 227.8s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 235.5s
Time: model 233.4s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 241.2s
Time: model 239.0s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 246.7s
Time: model 244.6s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 252.3s
Time: model 250.1s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 257.8s
Time: model 255.6s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 263.5s
Time: model 261.3s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 269.0s
Time: model 266.9s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 274.6s
Time: model 272.5s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Approval granted
Stage: resuming
Tool: bash
Approval: dap-1779876902-perm-1779876902508-1


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (3):
- 3 todos / completed / call_ytY4NYV9dSbjFEhO0fW87qJ
- Counts conversation and backlog lines / completed / Counts conversation and backlog lines
- bash / in_progress / jq -r '.status // "(missing)"' "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/memory-candidates.jsonl" | sort | uniq -c && jq -r '.status // "(missing)"' "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/semantic-candidates.jsonl" | so / cwd=/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (5):
- 3 todos / completed / call_ytY4NYV9dSbjFEhO0fW87qJ
- Counts conversation and backlog lines / completed / Counts conversation and backlog lines
- Counts candidate status buckets / completed / Counts candidate status buckets
- ../../state/persistent-chat/memory-candidates.jsonl / completed / /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/memory-candidates.jsonl
- ../../state/persistent-chat/semantic-candidates.jsonl / completed / /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/semantic-candidates.jsonl


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 276.7s
Time: model 274.6s, overhead 1.5s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 0 o 0 est $0.0000; p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 571.2k; active 4.4k; cache 566.8k/99%; p≈3.5ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 152


Completed.


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 277.6s
Time: model 274.6s, overhead 3.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 0 o 0 est $0.0000; p≈3.5ktok/14.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP p≈3.5ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 152


Completed what?


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP p≈3.5ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 152


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP p≈3.5ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.9s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP p≈3.5ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 152


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.3s
Time: overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.9ktok/11.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP p≈3.5ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 152


📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Waiting for first model/tool update…


* 🟠 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 3.0s
Time: model 1.1s, overhead 1.3s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 0 o 0 est $0.0000; p≈2.9ktok/11.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP p≈3.5ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 153


* 🔴 Failed
Stage: model/tool run failed
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 3.5s
Time: model 1.1s
Cause: direct ACP client completed without a final assistant message
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP p≈3.5ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 153


* 🔴 Failed
Stage: no final answer
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 4.1s
Time: model 1.1s
Cause: direct ACP client completed without a final assistant message
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP p≈3.5ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 153


⚠ Matrix-lite did not receive a final answer for this request. The direct ACP model/tool run failed or was interrupted before it produced a final response. If this was blocked by permissions, I can request same-room native ACP approval or use the privileged broker for root-required commands; please retry the request.


* 🔴 Failed
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 4.6s
Time: model 1.1s, overhead 3.5s
Cause: direct ACP client completed without a final assistant message
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 0 o 0 est $0.0000; p≈2.9ktok/11.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP p≈2.9ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 153


Huh?


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP p≈2.9ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 153


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP p≈2.9ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 153


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.7s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP p≈2.9ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 153


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.2s
Time: overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.5kch
Ctx: direct ACP p≈2.9ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 153


* 🟠 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 2.8s
Time: model 1.0s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 0 o 0 est $0.0000; p≈2.6ktok/10.5kch
Ctx: direct ACP p≈2.9ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 154


* 🔴 Failed
Stage: model/tool run failed
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 3.2s
Time: model 1.0s
Cause: direct ACP client completed without a final assistant message
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP p≈2.9ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 154


* 🔴 Failed
Stage: no final answer
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 3.5s
Time: model 1.0s
Cause: direct ACP client completed without a final assistant message
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP p≈2.9ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 154


* 🔴 Failed
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 4.2s
Time: model 1.0s, overhead 3.2s
Cause: direct ACP client completed without a final assistant message
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 0 o 0 est $0.0000; p≈2.6ktok/10.5kch
Ctx: direct ACP p≈2.6ktok; ctx 54.4%; usable 62.0%; observed turns 123; actual turns 154


Test test


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP p≈2.6ktok; ctx 54.5%; usable 55.5%; observed turns 126; actual turns 158


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP p≈2.6ktok; ctx 54.5%; usable 55.5%; observed turns 126; actual turns 158


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.9s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP p≈2.6ktok; ctx 54.5%; usable 55.5%; observed turns 126; actual turns 158


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.7s
Time: overhead 1.7s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.3ktok/9.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP p≈2.6ktok; ctx 54.5%; usable 55.5%; observed turns 126; actual turns 158


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 7.1s
Time: model 5.0s, overhead 1.7s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.3ktok/9.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP p≈2.6ktok; ctx 54.5%; usable 55.5%; observed turns 126; actual turns 158


📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Waiting for first model/tool update…


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 12.8s
Time: model 10.7s, overhead 1.7s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.3ktok/9.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP p≈2.6ktok; ctx 54.5%; usable 55.5%; observed turns 126; actual turns 159


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 18.3s
Time: model 16.2s, overhead 1.7s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.3ktok/9.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP p≈2.6ktok; ctx 54.5%; usable 55.5%; observed turns 126; actual turns 159


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Test


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Test received.


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 20.5s
Time: model 18.3s, overhead 1.7s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 592.7k o 7 est $1.482; p≈2.3ktok/9.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP p≈2.6ktok; ctx 54.5%; usable 55.5%; observed turns 126; actual turns 159


Test received.


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 21.2s
Time: model 18.3s, overhead 2.9s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 592.7k o 7 est $1.482; p≈2.3ktok/9.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 592.7k; active 592.7k; p≈2.3ktok; ctx 54.5%; usable 55.5%; observed turns 126; actual turns 159


Good, do you still remember what we were doing?


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 592.7k; active 592.7k; p≈2.3ktok; ctx 54.5%; usable 55.5%; observed turns 126; actual turns 159


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 592.7k; active 592.7k; p≈2.3ktok; ctx 54.5%; usable 55.5%; observed turns 126; actual turns 159


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 592.7k; active 592.7k; p≈2.3ktok; ctx 54.5%; usable 55.5%; observed turns 126; actual turns 159


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.9s
Time: overhead 1.9s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.2ktok/8.9kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 592.7k; active 592.7k; p≈2.3ktok; ctx 54.5%; usable 55.5%; observed turns 126; actual turns 159


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 7.5s
Time: model 5.0s, overhead 1.9s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.2ktok/8.9kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 592.7k; active 592.7k; p≈2.3ktok; ctx 54.5%; usable 55.5%; observed turns 126; actual turns 160


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 13.2s
Time: model 10.7s, overhead 1.9s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.2ktok/8.9kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 592.7k; active 592.7k; p≈2.3ktok; ctx 54.5%; usable 55.5%; observed turns 126; actual turns 160


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Yes


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Yes.

Main threads we were on:

- **Background curation is partially broken**
  - conversation-log writer path had been broken, then started working again
  - but the curator’s reviewed-cursor / “no new user messages” logic was still stale
  - we distinguished writer recovery from curator catch-up

- **We started backlog cleanup**
  - first manually
  - then by extending the existing helper:
    - `persistent-chat-memory memory-candidates ...`
  - we used it to bulk-ignore obvious **turn-packet recursion noise**

- **We also started real memory promotion**
  - promoted durable preferences like:
    - slightly longer responses
    - latency is okay if observable and worth it
    - external-message draft-first when formatting risk matters
    - persistent-chat is the main agent, not a lightweight worker

- **We fixed where behavioral guidance should live**
  - removed the bad repo-wide leakage
  - moved core behavior into the **bootstrap prompt


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 19.1s
Time: model 16.6s, overhead 1.9s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.2ktok/8.9kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 592.7k; active 592.7k; p≈2.3ktok; ctx 54.5%; usable 55.5%; observed turns 126; actual turns 160


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Yes.

Main threads we were on:

- **Background curation is partially broken**
  - conversation-log writer path had been broken, then started working again
  - but the curator’s reviewed-cursor / “no new user messages” logic was still stale
  - we distinguished writer recovery from curator catch-up

- **We started backlog cleanup**
  - first manually
  - then by extending the existing helper:
    - `persistent-chat-memory memory-candidates ...`
  - we used it to bulk-ignore obvious **turn-packet recursion noise**

- **We also started real memory promotion**
  - promoted durable preferences like:
    - slightly longer responses
    - latency is okay if observable and worth it
    - external-message draft-first when formatting risk matters
    - persistent-chat is the main agent, not a lightweight worker

- **We fixed where behavioral guidance should live**
  - removed the bad repo-wide leakage
  - moved core behavior into the **bootstrap prompt**
  - especially:
    - separate runtime facts vs hypotheticals
    - track resolved / active / hypothetical causes
    - provide constructive pushback
    - don’t overstate progress

- **We also investigated the tool failures**
  - one class was normal approval-timeout
  - another was `apply_patch` pending-start timeout
  - another was first-model-event timeout
  - later you said at least some of that was an actual OpenCode bug

So the immediate thing we were doing most recently was:
- **cleaning memory backlog**
- while also understanding that
- **the curator’s proper conversation-review path still needed catch-up/fix**.


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 22.2s
Time: model 19.7s, overhead 1.9s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 594.7k o 343 t 11 est $1.492; p≈2.2ktok/8.9kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 592.7k; active 592.7k; p≈2.3ktok; ctx 54.5%; usable 55.5%; observed turns 126; actual turns 160


Yes.

Main threads we were on:

- **Background curation is partially broken**
  - conversation-log writer path had been broken, then started working again
  - but the curator’s reviewed-cursor / “no new user messages” logic was still stale
  - we distinguished writer recovery from curator catch-up

- **We started backlog cleanup**
  - first manually
  - then by extending the existing helper:
    - `persistent-chat-memory memory-candidates ...`
  - we used it to bulk-ignore obvious **turn-packet recursion noise**

- **We also started real memory promotion**
  - promoted durable preferences like:
    - slightly longer responses
    - latency is okay if observable and worth it
    - external-message draft-first when formatting risk matters
    - persistent-chat is the main agent, not a lightweight worker

- **We fixed where behavioral guidance should live**
  - removed the bad repo-wide leakage
  - moved core behavior into the **bootstrap prompt**
  - especially:
    - separate runtime facts vs hypotheticals
    - track resolved / active / hypothetical causes
    - provide constructive pushback
    - don’t overstate progress

- **We also investigated the tool failures**
  - one class was normal approval-timeout
  - another was `apply_patch` pending-start timeout
  - another was first-model-event timeout
  - later you said at least some of that was an actual OpenCode bug

So the immediate thing we were doing most recently was:
- **cleaning memory backlog**
- while also understanding that
- **the curator’s proper conversation-review path still needed catch-up/fix**.


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 22.9s
Time: model 19.7s, overhead 3.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 594.7k o 343 t 11 est $1.492; p≈2.2ktok/8.9kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 595.0k; active 595.0k; p≈2.2ktok; ctx 54.5%; usable 55.5%; observed turns 126; actual turns 160


Amazing, I know this is the same session but it's great it was preserved. You said 'completed' before - what did you mean? It was a bit cryptic


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 595.0k; active 595.0k; p≈2.2ktok; ctx 56.7%; usable 57.9%; observed turns 128; actual turns 160


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 595.0k; active 595.0k; p≈2.2ktok; ctx 56.7%; usable 57.9%; observed turns 128; actual turns 160


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.9s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 595.0k; active 595.0k; p≈2.2ktok; ctx 56.7%; usable 57.9%; observed turns 128; actual turns 160


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.4s
Time: overhead 1.4s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.3kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 595.0k; active 595.0k; p≈2.2ktok; ctx 56.7%; usable 57.9%; observed turns 128; actual turns 160


📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Waiting for first model/tool update…


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 7.2s
Time: model 5.0s, overhead 1.4s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.3kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 595.0k; active 595.0k; p≈2.2ktok; ctx 56.7%; usable 57.9%; observed turns 128; actual turns 161


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 12.9s
Time: model 10.7s, overhead 1.4s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.3kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 595.0k; active 595.0k; p≈2.2ktok; ctx 56.7%; usable 57.9%; observed turns 128; actual turns 161


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 18.4s
Time: model 16.2s, overhead 1.4s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.3kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 595.0k; active 595.0k; p≈2.2ktok; ctx 56.7%; usable 57.9%; observed turns 128; actual turns 161


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 24.0s
Time: model 21.9s, overhead 1.4s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.3kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 595.0k; active 595.0k; p≈2.2ktok; ctx 56.7%; usable 57.9%; observed turns 128; actual turns 161


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
I


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 29.7s
Time: model 27.5s, overhead 1.4s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.3kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 595.0k; active 595.0k; p≈2.2ktok; ctx 56.7%; usable 57.9%; observed turns 128; actual turns 161


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
I meant I had completed the **review/inspection pass** you asked for:

- checking the current log/memory backlog situation
- looking at the conversation-log/cursor mismatch
- and figuring out whether the backlog still needed review

But yes, just saying **“Completed.”** was bad. It sounded like:
- everything is fixed
- or the whole backlog is handled

when I only meant:
- **that specific inspection task is done**

So the cryptic part was my fault. I should have said something like:
- **“Completed the inspection pass; backlog still needs cleanup.”**


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 33.6s
Time: model 31.4s, overhead 1.4s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 597.3k o 125 est $1.495; p≈2.6ktok/10.3kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 595.0k; active 595.0k; p≈2.2ktok; ctx 56.7%; usable 57.9%; observed turns 128; actual turns 161


I meant I had completed the **review/inspection pass** you asked for:

- checking the current log/memory backlog situation
- looking at the conversation-log/cursor mismatch
- and figuring out whether the backlog still needed review

But yes, just saying **“Completed.”** was bad. It sounded like:
- everything is fixed
- or the whole backlog is handled

when I only meant:
- **that specific inspection task is done**

So the cryptic part was my fault. I should have said something like:
- **“Completed the inspection pass; backlog still needs cleanup.”**


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 34.2s
Time: model 31.4s, overhead 2.9s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 597.3k o 125 est $1.495; p≈2.6ktok/10.3kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 597.5k; active 597.5k; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 56.7%; usable 57.9%; observed turns 128; actual turns 161


What did the inspection say?


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 597.5k; active 597.5k; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 56.7%; usable 57.9%; observed turns 128; actual turns 161