* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (3):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_pQPbas2CUMhoSwNsMYRciZ1
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_kU0ikzpwC53VZ2OgprCbWzP
- persistent_browser_call / pending / call_WZzRd6yLs0mNL4MXUZHSIZ5

Draft:
Got it — I’m entering `ec8px` into the live captcha for **168495316** now, then I’ll verify the send in the real inbox.


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 68.3s
Time: model 62.7s, overhead 3.8s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈2.0ktok/8.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 480.6k; active 2.9k; cache 477.7k/99%; p≈2.2ktok; ctx 45.8%; usable 46.7%; epoch turns 91; lifetime turns 377; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (3):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_pQPbas2CUMhoSwNsMYRciZ1
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_kU0ikzpwC53VZ2OgprCbWzP
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_WZzRd6yLs0mNL4MXUZHSIZ5

Draft:
Got it — I’m entering `ec8px` into the live captcha for **168495316** now, then I’ll verify the send in the real inbox.The


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (4):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_pQPbas2CUMhoSwNsMYRciZ1
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_kU0ikzpwC53VZ2OgprCbWzP
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_WZzRd6yLs0mNL4MXUZHSIZ5
- persistent_browser_navigate / in_progress / call_wklEgLWCCODl7sUgUPGgTYZ

Draft:
Got it — I’m entering `ec8px` into the live captcha for **168495316** now, then I’ll verify the send in the real inbox.The form succeeded. I’m checking the real inbox so we can treat this second Garching listing as verified too.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (5):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_pQPbas2CUMhoSwNsMYRciZ1
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_kU0ikzpwC53VZ2OgprCbWzP
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_WZzRd6yLs0mNL4MXUZHSIZ5
- persistent_browser_navigate / completed / call_wklEgLWCCODl7sUgUPGgTYZ
- persistent_browser_snapshot / pending / call_jK0Wmd44Knkr1PQPGWfXsG9

Draft:
Got it — I’m entering `ec8px` into the live captcha for **168495316** now, then I’ll verify the send in the real inbox.The form succeeded. I’m checking the real inbox so we can treat this second Garching listing as verified too.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (5):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_pQPbas2CUMhoSwNsMYRciZ1
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_kU0ikzpwC53VZ2OgprCbWzP
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_WZzRd6yLs0mNL4MXUZHSIZ5
- persistent_browser_navigate / completed / call_wklEgLWCCODl7sUgUPGgTYZ
- persistent_browser_snapshot / in_progress / call_jK0Wmd44Knkr1PQPGWfXsG9

Draft:
Got it — I’m entering `ec8px` into the live captcha for **168495316** now, then I’ll verify the send in the real inbox.The form succeeded. I’m checking the real inbox so we can treat this second Garching listing as verified too.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (5):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_pQPbas2CUMhoSwNsMYRciZ1
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_kU0ikzpwC53VZ2OgprCbWzP
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_WZzRd6yLs0mNL4MXUZHSIZ5
- persistent_browser_navigate / completed / call_wklEgLWCCODl7sUgUPGgTYZ
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_jK0Wmd44Knkr1PQPGWfXsG9

Draft:
Got it — I’m entering `ec8px` into the live captcha for **168495316** now, then I’ll verify the send in the real inbox.The form succeeded. I’m checking the real inbox so we can treat this second Garching listing as verified too.Good


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (5):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_pQPbas2CUMhoSwNsMYRciZ1
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_kU0ikzpwC53VZ2OgprCbWzP
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_WZzRd6yLs0mNL4MXUZHSIZ5
- persistent_browser_navigate / completed / call_wklEgLWCCODl7sUgUPGgTYZ
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_jK0Wmd44Knkr1PQPGWfXsG9

Draft:
Got it — I’m entering `ec8px` into the live captcha for **168495316** now, then I’ll verify the send in the real inbox.The form succeeded. I’m checking the real inbox so we can treat this second Garching listing as verified too.Good — **168495316** also went through.

Verified in the real inbox:
- it is now present in **Nachrichten**
- same provider grouping shows up as **Bernd Guenther · 85748 Garching ...**
- timestamp: **19:57**

So both of the new Garching options are now sent:
- **168496704** — Bernd Guenther
- **168495316** — provider hidden in form, but grouped to the same Garching conversation stream / sender label in inbox

And yes, I adapted the second one too:
- neutral **Guten Tag**
- **2,5-Zimmer-Dachgeschosswohnung**
- **Garching**
- **zum 1.8.2026 bzw. nach Absprache**

If you want, next I can move on to:
- **Eching 168252005**
or
- **Neufahrn 168398031**


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 123.2s
Time: model 117.6s, overhead 3.8s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: i 8.2k o 195 cache 482.8k/98% est $0.0235; p≈2.0ktok/8.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 480.6k; active 2.9k; cache 477.7k/99%; p≈2.2ktok; ctx 45.8%; usable 46.7%; epoch turns 91; lifetime turns 377; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


Got it — I’m entering `ec8px` into the live captcha for **168495316** now, then I’ll verify the send in the real inbox.The form succeeded. I’m checking the real inbox so we can treat this second Garching listing as verified too.Good — **168495316** also went through.

Verified in the real inbox:
- it is now present in **Nachrichten**
- same provider grouping shows up as **Bernd Guenther · 85748 Garching ...**
- timestamp: **19:57**

So both of the new Garching options are now sent:
- **168496704** — Bernd Guenther
- **168495316** — provider hidden in form, but grouped to the same Garching conversation stream / sender label in inbox

And yes, I adapted the second one too:
- neutral **Guten Tag**
- **2,5-Zimmer-Dachgeschosswohnung**
- **Garching**
- **zum 1.8.2026 bzw. nach Absprache**

If you want, next I can move on to:
- **Eching 168252005**
or
- **Neufahrn 168398031**


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 125.4s
Time: model 117.6s, overhead 7.8s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: i 8.2k o 195 cache 482.8k/98% est $0.0235; p≈2.0ktok/8.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 491.2k; active 8.4k; cache 482.8k/98%; p≈2.0ktok; ctx 45.8%; usable 46.7%; epoch turns 91; lifetime turns 377; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


What are those?


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Ctx: direct ACP session 491.2k; active 8.4k; cache 482.8k/98%; p≈2.0ktok; ctx 46.8%; usable 47.8%; epoch turns 92; lifetime turns 378; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.1s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Ctx: direct ACP session 491.2k; active 8.4k; cache 482.8k/98%; p≈2.0ktok; ctx 46.8%; usable 47.8%; epoch turns 92; lifetime turns 378; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 2.1s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Ctx: direct ACP session 491.2k; active 8.4k; cache 482.8k/98%; p≈2.0ktok; ctx 46.8%; usable 47.8%; epoch turns 92; lifetime turns 378; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 3.8s
Time: overhead 3.8s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈1.9ktok/7.8kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 491.2k; active 8.4k; cache 482.8k/98%; p≈2.0ktok; ctx 46.8%; usable 47.8%; epoch turns 92; lifetime turns 378; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Waiting for first model/tool update…


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Those


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Those are the **next two surrounding-area candidates** we had shortlisted after the core north-belt pass:

### **Eching — 168252005**
- **2 rooms**
- **63 m²**
- **1.090 €**
- private
- looked like a decent fallback

### **Neufahrn — 168398031**
- **2 rooms**
- **77.5 m²**
- **1.010 €**
- the strongest candidate outside the core four

So I meant:
- if we continue beyond Garching/Ismaning/Schleißheim leftovers,
- the next sensible places to try are **Eching** and **Neufahrn**.

If you want, I can now open both and re-check them before we send anything.


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 43.0s
Time: model 37.3s, overhead 3.8s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: i 4.6k o 164 cache 488.4k/99% est $0.0140; p≈1.9ktok/7.8kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 491.2k; active 8.4k; cache 482.8k/98%; p≈2.0ktok; ctx 46.8%; usable 47.8%; epoch turns 92; lifetime turns 378; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


Those are the **next two surrounding-area candidates** we had shortlisted after the core north-belt pass:

### **Eching — 168252005**
- **2 rooms**
- **63 m²**
- **1.090 €**
- private
- looked like a decent fallback

### **Neufahrn — 168398031**
- **2 rooms**
- **77.5 m²**
- **1.010 €**
- the strongest candidate outside the core four

So I meant:
- if we continue beyond Garching/Ismaning/Schleißheim leftovers,
- the next sensible places to try are **Eching** and **Neufahrn**.

If you want, I can now open both and re-check them before we send anything.


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 45.5s
Time: model 37.3s, overhead 8.2s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: i 4.6k o 164 cache 488.4k/99% est $0.0140; p≈1.9ktok/7.8kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 493.2k; active 4.8k; cache 488.4k/99%; p≈1.9ktok; ctx 46.8%; usable 47.8%; epoch turns 92; lifetime turns 378; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


Yes please


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Ctx: direct ACP session 493.2k; active 4.8k; cache 488.4k/99%; p≈1.9ktok; ctx 47.0%; usable 48.0%; epoch turns 93; lifetime turns 379; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.1s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Ctx: direct ACP session 493.2k; active 4.8k; cache 488.4k/99%; p≈1.9ktok; ctx 47.0%; usable 48.0%; epoch turns 93; lifetime turns 379; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 2.3s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Ctx: direct ACP session 493.2k; active 4.8k; cache 488.4k/99%; p≈1.9ktok; ctx 47.0%; usable 48.0%; epoch turns 93; lifetime turns 379; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 4.4s
Time: overhead 4.4s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈1.8ktok/7.4kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 493.2k; active 4.8k; cache 488.4k/99%; p≈1.9ktok; ctx 47.0%; usable 48.0%; epoch turns 93; lifetime turns 379; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
I


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (1):
- persistent_browser_call / pending / call_C1vafPHu5q8Ov2DwAPayp27

Draft:
I’m opening **Neufahrn 168398031** and **Eching 168252005** now and will re-check them before sending anything.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (2):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_C1vafPHu5q8Ov2DwAPayp27
- persistent_browser_call / in_progress / call_iIMXU3jS6EKpO4qKcMgDREA

Draft:
I’m opening **Neufahrn 168398031** and **Eching 168252005** now and will re-check them before sending anything.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (2):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_C1vafPHu5q8Ov2DwAPayp27
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_iIMXU3jS6EKpO4qKcMgDREA

Draft:
I’m opening **Neufahrn 168398031** and **Eching 168252005** now and will re-check them before sending anything.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (2):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_C1vafPHu5q8Ov2DwAPayp27
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_iIMXU3jS6EKpO4qKcMgDREA

Draft:
I’m opening **Neufahrn 168398031** and **Eching 168252005** now and will re-check them before sending anything.Both


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (3):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_C1vafPHu5q8Ov2DwAPayp27
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_iIMXU3jS6EKpO4qKcMgDREA
- persistent_browser_call / pending / call_EOxeOPWHrk0WVhDKXUwi0Es

Draft:
I’m opening **Neufahrn 168398031** and **Eching 168252005** now and will re-check them before sending anything.Both are open. I’m extracting the details that matter so we can decide whether to send one or both.


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 69.3s
Time: model 62.8s, overhead 4.4s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈1.8ktok/7.4kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 493.2k; active 4.8k; cache 488.4k/99%; p≈1.9ktok; ctx 47.0%; usable 48.0%; epoch turns 93; lifetime turns 379; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (6):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_C1vafPHu5q8Ov2DwAPayp27
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_iIMXU3jS6EKpO4qKcMgDREA
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_EOxeOPWHrk0WVhDKXUwi0Es
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_f6Lkq0JhCFvrjXUd01FfIai
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_4t8k9wzAhbGCQprhiXwt0Y8
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_x3NmMSspPZX8jhvG2yldVYx

Draft:
I’m opening **Neufahrn 168398031** and **Eching 168252005** now and will re-check them before sending anything.Both are open. I’m extracting the details that matter so we can decide whether to send one or both.I


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (6):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_C1vafPHu5q8Ov2DwAPayp27
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_iIMXU3jS6EKpO4qKcMgDREA
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_EOxeOPWHrk0WVhDKXUwi0Es
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_f6Lkq0JhCFvrjXUd01FfIai
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_4t8k9wzAhbGCQprhiXwt0Y8
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_x3NmMSspPZX8jhvG2yldVYx

Draft:
I’m opening **Neufahrn 168398031** and **Eching 168252005** now and will re-check them before sending anything.Both are open. I’m extracting the details that matter so we can decide whether to send one or both.I checked both more closely.

## Neufahrn — 168398031
Still good, but **not as clean as it first looked**:
- **2 Zi**
- **77.5 m²**
- **1.010 € cold / 1.350 € warm**
- **EBK**
- **Balkon**
- **Bezugsfrei ab 01.08.2026**
- not furnished
- not Nachvermietung

### Downsides
- **The kitchen can be taken over from the previous tenant**
  so this is an **Ablöse / buyout risk**
- garage/stellplatz also listed
- competition already high:
  - views ~640
  - saved ~70
  - contacted ~76

So: still possible, but not as clean as I hoped.

---

## Eching — 168252005
This one is similar:
- **2 Zi**
- **63 m²**
- **1.090 € cold / 1.250 € warm**
- **EBK**
- **Balkon**
- **Bezugsfrei ab


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (6):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_C1vafPHu5q8Ov2DwAPayp27
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_iIMXU3jS6EKpO4qKcMgDREA
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_EOxeOPWHrk0WVhDKXUwi0Es
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_f6Lkq0JhCFvrjXUd01FfIai
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_4t8k9wzAhbGCQprhiXwt0Y8
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_x3NmMSspPZX8jhvG2yldVYx

Draft:
I’m opening **Neufahrn 168398031** and **Eching 168252005** now and will re-check them before sending anything.Both are open. I’m extracting the details that matter so we can decide whether to send one or both.I checked both more closely.

## Neufahrn — 168398031
Still good, but **not as clean as it first looked**:
- **2 Zi**
- **77.5 m²**
- **1.010 € cold / 1.350 € warm**
- **EBK**
- **Balkon**
- **Bezugsfrei ab 01.08.2026**
- not furnished
- not Nachvermietung

### Downsides
- **The kitchen can be taken over from the previous tenant**
  so this is an **Ablöse / buyout risk**
- garage/stellplatz also listed
- competition already high:
  - views ~640
  - saved ~70
  - contacted ~76

So: still possible, but not as clean as I hoped.

---

## Eching — 168252005
This one is similar:
- **2 Zi**
- **63 m²**
- **1.090 € cold / 1.250 € warm**
- **EBK**
- **Balkon**
- **Bezugsfrei ab 1.7.2026**
- not furnished
- not Nachvermietung
- pets **nach Vereinbarung**

### Downsides
- also shows **Ablöse / takeover risk**
- Tiefgaragenstellplatz listed
- competition is even higher:
  - views ~1430
  - saved ~119
  - contacted ~106

So this is also **not clean-clean**.

---

## Bottom line
Both are still **sendable**, but both now moved down because of likely **kitchen/transfer buyout friction**.

### If I rank them now:
1. **168398031** — slightly better
2. **168252005** — still okay, but more crowded
3. neither is as clean as the better Garching private ones were

So if you want to keep pushing, I would still try them — just with lower expectations and extra caution about:
- **Ablöse**
- kitchen takeover
- any hidden costs tied to previous tenant items

If you want, I can proceed with **168398031** first.


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 87.9s
Time: model 81.4s, overhead 4.4s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: i 7.5k o 453 cache 494.6k/99% est $0.0255; p≈1.8ktok/7.4kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 493.2k; active 4.8k; cache 488.4k/99%; p≈1.9ktok; ctx 47.0%; usable 48.0%; epoch turns 93; lifetime turns 379; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


I’m opening **Neufahrn 168398031** and **Eching 168252005** now and will re-check them before sending anything.Both are open. I’m extracting the details that matter so we can decide whether to send one or both.I checked both more closely.

## Neufahrn — 168398031
Still good, but **not as clean as it first looked**:
- **2 Zi**
- **77.5 m²**
- **1.010 € cold / 1.350 € warm**
- **EBK**
- **Balkon**
- **Bezugsfrei ab 01.08.2026**
- not furnished
- not Nachvermietung

### Downsides
- **The kitchen can be taken over from the previous tenant**
  so this is an **Ablöse / buyout risk**
- garage/stellplatz also listed
- competition already high:
  - views ~640
  - saved ~70
  - contacted ~76

So: still possible, but not as clean as I hoped.

---

## Eching — 168252005
This one is similar:
- **2 Zi**
- **63 m²**
- **1.090 € cold / 1.250 € warm**
- **EBK**
- **Balkon**
- **Bezugsfrei ab 1.7.2026**
- not furnished
- not Nachvermietung
- pets **nach Vereinbarung**

### Downsides
- also shows **Ablöse / takeover risk**
- Tiefgaragenstellplatz listed
- competition is even higher:
  - views ~1430
  - saved ~119
  - contacted ~106

So this is also **not clean-clean**.

---

## Bottom line
Both are still **sendable**, but both now moved down because of likely **kitchen/transfer buyout friction**.

### If I rank them now:
1. **168398031** — slightly better
2. **168252005** — still okay, but more crowded
3. neither is as clean as the better Garching private ones were

So if you want to keep pushing, I would still try them — just with lower expectations and extra caution about:
- **Ablöse**
- kitchen takeover
- any hidden costs tied to previous tenant items

If you want, I can proceed with **168398031** first.


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 90.4s
Time: model 81.4s, overhead 9.0s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: i 7.5k o 453 cache 494.6k/99% est $0.0255; p≈1.8ktok/7.4kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 502.5k; active 7.9k; cache 494.6k/99%; p≈1.8ktok; ctx 47.0%; usable 48.0%; epoch turns 93; lifetime turns 379; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


Yes


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Ctx: direct ACP session 502.5k; active 7.9k; cache 494.6k/99%; p≈1.8ktok; ctx 47.0%; usable 48.0%; epoch turns 93; lifetime turns 379; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.2s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Ctx: direct ACP session 502.5k; active 7.9k; cache 494.6k/99%; p≈1.8ktok; ctx 47.0%; usable 48.0%; epoch turns 93; lifetime turns 379; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 2.2s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Ctx: direct ACP session 502.5k; active 7.9k; cache 494.6k/99%; p≈1.8ktok; ctx 47.0%; usable 48.0%; epoch turns 93; lifetime turns 379; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 3.8s
Time: overhead 3.8s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈1.9ktok/7.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 502.5k; active 7.9k; cache 494.6k/99%; p≈1.8ktok; ctx 47.0%; usable 48.0%; epoch turns 93; lifetime turns 379; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Waiting for first model/tool update…


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Okay


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (2):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_YP5t40fWvTQCKTYo2r93aYz
- persistent_browser_call / pending / call_i9BPDt0wI6r5ub8XKmpXjFV

Draft:
Okay — I’ll proceed with the stronger of the two first:

- **Neufahrn 168398031**

I’ll open the contact flow, adapt the message properly, and see whether it’s worth sending despite the kitchen takeover risk.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (2):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_YP5t40fWvTQCKTYo2r93aYz
- persistent_browser_call / in_progress / call_i9BPDt0wI6r5ub8XKmpXjFV

Draft:
Okay — I’ll proceed with the stronger of the two first:

- **Neufahrn 168398031**

I’ll open the contact flow, adapt the message properly, and see whether it’s worth sending despite the kitchen takeover risk.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (2):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_YP5t40fWvTQCKTYo2r93aYz
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_i9BPDt0wI6r5ub8XKmpXjFV

Draft:
Okay — I’ll proceed with the stronger of the two first:

- **Neufahrn 168398031**

I’ll open the contact flow, adapt the message properly, and see whether it’s worth sending despite the kitchen takeover risk.The


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 67.7s
Time: model 62.2s, overhead 3.8s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈1.9ktok/7.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 502.5k; active 7.9k; cache 494.6k/99%; p≈1.8ktok; ctx 47.0%; usable 48.0%; epoch turns 93; lifetime turns 379; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (3):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_YP5t40fWvTQCKTYo2r93aYz
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_i9BPDt0wI6r5ub8XKmpXjFV
- persistent_browser_call / in_progress / call_hgnpoGOavnwJIJ5xOYQz8tC

Draft:
Okay — I’ll proceed with the stronger of the two first:

- **Neufahrn 168398031**

I’ll open the contact flow, adapt the message properly, and see whether it’s worth sending despite the kitchen takeover risk.The Neufahrn form is open. I’m checking whether it’s in the logged-in state and who the provider is before I decide the exact wording.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (3):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_YP5t40fWvTQCKTYo2r93aYz
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_i9BPDt0wI6r5ub8XKmpXjFV
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_hgnpoGOavnwJIJ5xOYQz8tC

Draft:
Okay — I’ll proceed with the stronger of the two first:

- **Neufahrn 168398031**

I’ll open the contact flow, adapt the message properly, and see whether it’s worth sending despite the kitchen takeover risk.The Neufahrn form is open. I’m checking whether it’s in the logged-in state and who the provider is before I decide the exact wording.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (4):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_YP5t40fWvTQCKTYo2r93aYz
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_i9BPDt0wI6r5ub8XKmpXjFV
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_hgnpoGOavnwJIJ5xOYQz8tC
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_W4eoGqSWkeMGCJrEe5yVJfX

Draft:
Okay — I’ll proceed with the stronger of the two first:

- **Neufahrn 168398031**

I’ll open the contact flow, adapt the message properly, and see whether it’s worth sending despite the kitchen takeover risk.The Neufahrn form is open. I’m checking whether it’s in the logged-in state and who the provider is before I decide the exact wording.The Neufahrn form is for **Hepting IMMOBILIEN GmbH** and it still had the old Garching text in it, so I’m replacing it with a Neufahrn-specific version now.Even


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (5):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_YP5t40fWvTQCKTYo2r93aYz
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_i9BPDt0wI6r5ub8XKmpXjFV
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_hgnpoGOavnwJIJ5xOYQz8tC
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_W4eoGqSWkeMGCJrEe5yVJfX
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_74vVD0KHYs6XHHYMaNeuU8a

Draft:
Okay — I’ll proceed with the stronger of the two first:

- **Neufahrn 168398031**

I’ll open the contact flow, adapt the message properly, and see whether it’s worth sending despite the kitchen takeover risk.The Neufahrn form is open. I’m checking whether it’s in the logged-in state and who the provider is before I decide the exact wording.The Neufahrn form is for **Hepting IMMOBILIEN GmbH** and it still had the old Garching text in it, so I’m replacing it with a Neufahrn-specific version now.Even with the kitchen-takeover caveat, this Neufahrn one is still worth trying. I’m sending it now and then I’ll see whether we land in captcha or success.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (6):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_YP5t40fWvTQCKTYo2r93aYz
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_i9BPDt0wI6r5ub8XKmpXjFV
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_hgnpoGOavnwJIJ5xOYQz8tC
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_W4eoGqSWkeMGCJrEe5yVJfX
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_74vVD0KHYs6XHHYMaNeuU8a
- persistent_browser_call / pending / call_NgCyzFBw3ZU0a14TML2IYCy

Draft:
Okay — I’ll proceed with the stronger of the two first:

- **Neufahrn 168398031**

I’ll open the contact flow, adapt the message properly, and see whether it’s worth sending despite the kitchen takeover risk.The Neufahrn form is open. I’m checking whether it’s in the logged-in state and who the provider is before I decide the exact wording.The Neufahrn form is for **Hepting IMMOBILIEN GmbH** and it still had the old Garching text in it, so I’m replacing it with a Neufahrn-specific version now.Even with the kitchen-takeover caveat, this Neufahrn one is still worth trying. I’m sending it now and then I’ll see whether we land in captcha or success.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (6):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_YP5t40fWvTQCKTYo2r93aYz
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_i9BPDt0wI6r5ub8XKmpXjFV
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_hgnpoGOavnwJIJ5xOYQz8tC
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_W4eoGqSWkeMGCJrEe5yVJfX
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_74vVD0KHYs6XHHYMaNeuU8a
- persistent_browser_call / in_progress / call_NgCyzFBw3ZU0a14TML2IYCy

Draft:
Okay — I’ll proceed with the stronger of the two first:

- **Neufahrn 168398031**

I’ll open the contact flow, adapt the message properly, and see whether it’s worth sending despite the kitchen takeover risk.The Neufahrn form is open. I’m checking whether it’s in the logged-in state and who the provider is before I decide the exact wording.The Neufahrn form is for **Hepting IMMOBILIEN GmbH** and it still had the old Garching text in it, so I’m replacing it with a Neufahrn-specific version now.Even with the kitchen-takeover caveat, this Neufahrn one is still worth trying. I’m sending it now and then I’ll see whether we land in captcha or success.


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 131.1s
Time: model 125.6s, overhead 3.8s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈1.9ktok/7.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 502.5k; active 7.9k; cache 494.6k/99%; p≈1.8ktok; ctx 47.0%; usable 48.0%; epoch turns 93; lifetime turns 379; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (6):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_YP5t40fWvTQCKTYo2r93aYz
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_i9BPDt0wI6r5ub8XKmpXjFV
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_hgnpoGOavnwJIJ5xOYQz8tC
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_W4eoGqSWkeMGCJrEe5yVJfX
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_74vVD0KHYs6XHHYMaNeuU8a
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_NgCyzFBw3ZU0a14TML2IYCy

Draft:
Okay — I’ll proceed with the stronger of the two first:

- **Neufahrn 168398031**

I’ll open the contact flow, adapt the message properly, and see whether it’s worth sending despite the kitchen takeover risk.The Neufahrn form is open. I’m checking whether it’s in the logged-in state and who the provider is before I decide the exact wording.The Neufahrn form is for **Hepting IMMOBILIEN GmbH** and it still had the old Garching text in it, so I’m replacing it with a Neufahrn-specific version now.Even with the kitchen-takeover caveat, this Neufahrn one is still worth trying. I’m sending it now and then I’ll see whether we land in captcha or success.Ne


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (7):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_YP5t40fWvTQCKTYo2r93aYz
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_i9BPDt0wI6r5ub8XKmpXjFV
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_hgnpoGOavnwJIJ5xOYQz8tC
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_W4eoGqSWkeMGCJrEe5yVJfX
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_74vVD0KHYs6XHHYMaNeuU8a
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_NgCyzFBw3ZU0a14TML2IYCy
- persistent_browser_call / in_progress / call_aJ9hqilJCGSlIi1EuayuLBk

Draft:
Okay — I’ll proceed with the stronger of the two first:

- **Neufahrn 168398031**

I’ll open the contact flow, adapt the message properly, and see whether it’s worth sending despite the kitchen takeover risk.The Neufahrn form is open. I’m checking whether it’s in the logged-in state and who the provider is before I decide the exact wording.The Neufahrn form is for **Hepting IMMOBILIEN GmbH** and it still had the old Garching text in it, so I’m replacing it with a Neufahrn-specific version now.Even with the kitchen-takeover caveat, this Neufahrn one is still worth trying. I’m sending it now and then I’ll see whether we land in captcha or success.Neufahrn didn’t go to captcha — it hit a form validation error instead. I’m checking the actual invalid field directly rather than guessing.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (7):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_YP5t40fWvTQCKTYo2r93aYz
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_i9BPDt0wI6r5ub8XKmpXjFV
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_hgnpoGOavnwJIJ5xOYQz8tC
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_W4eoGqSWkeMGCJrEe5yVJfX
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_74vVD0KHYs6XHHYMaNeuU8a
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_NgCyzFBw3ZU0a14TML2IYCy
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_aJ9hqilJCGSlIi1EuayuLBk

Draft:
Okay — I’ll proceed with the stronger of the two first:

- **Neufahrn 168398031**

I’ll open the contact flow, adapt the message properly, and see whether it’s worth sending despite the kitchen takeover risk.The Neufahrn form is open. I’m checking whether it’s in the logged-in state and who the provider is before I decide the exact wording.The Neufahrn form is for **Hepting IMMOBILIEN GmbH** and it still had the old Garching text in it, so I’m replacing it with a Neufahrn-specific version now.Even with the kitchen-takeover caveat, this Neufahrn one is still worth trying. I’m sending it now and then I’ll see whether we land in captcha or success.Neufahrn didn’t go to captcha — it hit a form validation error instead. I’m checking the actual invalid field directly rather than guessing.The


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (7):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_YP5t40fWvTQCKTYo2r93aYz
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_i9BPDt0wI6r5ub8XKmpXjFV
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_hgnpoGOavnwJIJ5xOYQz8tC
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_W4eoGqSWkeMGCJrEe5yVJfX
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_74vVD0KHYs6XHHYMaNeuU8a
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_NgCyzFBw3ZU0a14TML2IYCy
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_aJ9hqilJCGSlIi1EuayuLBk

Draft:
Okay — I’ll proceed with the stronger of the two first:

- **Neufahrn 168398031**

I’ll open the contact flow, adapt the message properly, and see whether it’s worth sending despite the kitchen takeover risk.The Neufahrn form is open. I’m checking whether it’s in the logged-in state and who the provider is before I decide the exact wording.The Neufahrn form is for **Hepting IMMOBILIEN GmbH** and it still had the old Garching text in it, so I’m replacing it with a Neufahrn-specific version now.Even with the kitchen-takeover caveat, this Neufahrn one is still worth trying. I’m sending it now and then I’ll see whether we land in captcha or success.Neufahrn didn’t go to captcha — it hit a form validation error instead. I’m checking the actual invalid field directly rather than guessing.The form state after submit is weird enough that I don’t want to guess further blind. I’m going to pause sending Neufahrn for the moment and say clearly: it likely needs a more explicit logged-in/field-prefill fix before it’s worth another click. Eching is still available as the cleaner next immediate send path.Quick result:

- **Neufahrn 168398031** is **not ready to send cleanly yet**
- after clicking submit it did **not** go to captcha
- it also did **not** expose a simple invalid field
- so this one likely needs a more annoying form-state fix before it’s worth pushing further

Given that, my practical recommendation is:

### Next immediate sendable target
- **Eching 168252005**

### Neufahrn 168398


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (7):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_YP5t40fWvTQCKTYo2r93aYz
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_i9BPDt0wI6r5ub8XKmpXjFV
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_hgnpoGOavnwJIJ5xOYQz8tC
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_W4eoGqSWkeMGCJrEe5yVJfX
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_74vVD0KHYs6XHHYMaNeuU8a
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_NgCyzFBw3ZU0a14TML2IYCy
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_aJ9hqilJCGSlIi1EuayuLBk

Draft:
Okay — I’ll proceed with the stronger of the two first:

- **Neufahrn 168398031**

I’ll open the contact flow, adapt the message properly, and see whether it’s worth sending despite the kitchen takeover risk.The Neufahrn form is open. I’m checking whether it’s in the logged-in state and who the provider is before I decide the exact wording.The Neufahrn form is for **Hepting IMMOBILIEN GmbH** and it still had the old Garching text in it, so I’m replacing it with a Neufahrn-specific version now.Even with the kitchen-takeover caveat, this Neufahrn one is still worth trying. I’m sending it now and then I’ll see whether we land in captcha or success.Neufahrn didn’t go to captcha — it hit a form validation error instead. I’m checking the actual invalid field directly rather than guessing.The form state after submit is weird enough that I don’t want to guess further blind. I’m going to pause sending Neufahrn for the moment and say clearly: it likely needs a more explicit logged-in/field-prefill fix before it’s worth another click. Eching is still available as the cleaner next immediate send path.Quick result:

- **Neufahrn 168398031** is **not ready to send cleanly yet**
- after clicking submit it did **not** go to captcha
- it also did **not** expose a simple invalid field
- so this one likely needs a more annoying form-state fix before it’s worth pushing further

Given that, my practical recommendation is:

### Next immediate sendable target
- **Eching 168252005**

### Neufahrn 168398031
Still possible, but currently:
- more friction
- kitchen takeover risk
- and the form flow is being annoying

So I’d say:
- **skip Neufahrn for the moment**
- **send Eching next**
- come back to Neufahrn later if needed

If you want, I can proceed with **Eching 168252005** now.


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 170.8s
Time: model 165.3s, overhead 3.8s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: i 4.9k o 259 cache 507.4k/99% est $0.0161; p≈1.9ktok/7.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 502.5k; active 7.9k; cache 494.6k/99%; p≈1.8ktok; ctx 47.9%; usable 48.9%; epoch turns 94; lifetime turns 380; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


Okay — I’ll proceed with the stronger of the two first:

- **Neufahrn 168398031**

I’ll open the contact flow, adapt the message properly, and see whether it’s worth sending despite the kitchen takeover risk.The Neufahrn form is open. I’m checking whether it’s in the logged-in state and who the provider is before I decide the exact wording.The Neufahrn form is for **Hepting IMMOBILIEN GmbH** and it still had the old Garching text in it, so I’m replacing it with a Neufahrn-specific version now.Even with the kitchen-takeover caveat, this Neufahrn one is still worth trying. I’m sending it now and then I’ll see whether we land in captcha or success.Neufahrn didn’t go to captcha — it hit a form validation error instead. I’m checking the actual invalid field directly rather than guessing.The form state after submit is weird enough that I don’t want to guess further blind. I’m going to pause sending Neufahrn for the moment and say clearly: it likely needs a more explicit logged-in/field-prefill fix before it’s worth another click. Eching is still available as the cleaner next immediate send path.Quick result:

- **Neufahrn 168398031** is **not ready to send cleanly yet**
- after clicking submit it did **not** go to captcha
- it also did **not** expose a simple invalid field
- so this one likely needs a more annoying form-state fix before it’s worth pushing further

Given that, my practical recommendation is:

### Next immediate sendable target
- **Eching 168252005**

### Neufahrn 168398031
Still possible, but currently:
- more friction
- kitchen takeover risk
- and the form flow is being annoying

So I’d say:
- **skip Neufahrn for the moment**
- **send Eching next**
- come back to Neufahrn later if needed

If you want, I can proceed with **Eching 168252005** now.


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 174.4s
Time: model 165.3s, overhead 9.1s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: i 4.9k o 259 cache 507.4k/99% est $0.0161; p≈1.9ktok/7.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 512.5k; active 5.1k; cache 507.4k/99%; p≈1.9ktok; ctx 47.9%; usable 48.9%; epoch turns 94; lifetime turns 380; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


Sorry for disappearing, I blew my chatgpt/codex limits and wanted to conserve them. Now they are reset so we are good


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Ctx: direct ACP session 512.5k; active 5.1k; cache 507.4k/99%; p≈1.9ktok; ctx 48.9%; usable 49.8%; epoch turns 95; lifetime turns 381; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.0s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Ctx: direct ACP session 512.5k; active 5.1k; cache 507.4k/99%; p≈1.9ktok; ctx 48.9%; usable 49.8%; epoch turns 95; lifetime turns 381; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 2.2s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Ctx: direct ACP session 512.5k; active 5.1k; cache 507.4k/99%; p≈1.9ktok; ctx 48.9%; usable 49.8%; epoch turns 95; lifetime turns 381; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 3.3s
Time: overhead 3.3s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈2.4ktok/9.7kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 512.5k; active 5.1k; cache 507.4k/99%; p≈1.9ktok; ctx 48.9%; usable 49.8%; epoch turns 95; lifetime turns 381; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Waiting for first model/tool update…


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 66.8s
Time: model 62.1s, overhead 3.3s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈2.4ktok/9.7kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 512.5k; active 5.1k; cache 507.4k/99%; p≈1.9ktok; ctx 48.9%; usable 49.8%; epoch turns 95; lifetime turns 381; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 129.8s
Time: model 125.1s, overhead 3.3s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈2.4ktok/9.7kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 512.5k; active 5.1k; cache 507.4k/99%; p≈1.9ktok; ctx 48.9%; usable 49.8%; epoch turns 95; lifetime turns 381; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 192.5s
Time: model 187.8s, overhead 3.3s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈2.4ktok/9.7kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 512.5k; active 5.1k; cache 507.4k/99%; p≈1.9ktok; ctx 48.9%; usable 49.8%; epoch turns 95; lifetime turns 381; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 255.0s
Time: model 250.3s, overhead 3.3s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈2.4ktok/9.7kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 512.5k; active 5.1k; cache 507.4k/99%; p≈1.9ktok; ctx 48.9%; usable 49.8%; epoch turns 95; lifetime turns 381; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 317.6s
Time: model 312.9s, overhead 3.3s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈2.4ktok/9.7kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 512.5k; active 5.1k; cache 507.4k/99%; p≈1.9ktok; ctx 48.9%; usable 49.8%; epoch turns 95; lifetime turns 381; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 379.6s
Time: model 374.9s, overhead 3.3s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈2.4ktok/9.7kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 512.5k; active 5.1k; cache 507.4k/99%; p≈1.9ktok; ctx 48.9%; usable 49.8%; epoch turns 95; lifetime turns 381; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 442.0s
Time: model 437.3s, overhead 3.3s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈2.4ktok/9.7kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 512.5k; active 5.1k; cache 507.4k/99%; p≈1.9ktok; ctx 48.9%; usable 49.8%; epoch turns 95; lifetime turns 381; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 504.5s
Time: model 499.8s, overhead 3.3s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈2.4ktok/9.7kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 512.5k; active 5.1k; cache 507.4k/99%; p≈1.9ktok; ctx 48.9%; usable 49.8%; epoch turns 95; lifetime turns 381; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 566.8s
Time: model 562.1s, overhead 3.3s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈2.4ktok/9.7kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 512.5k; active 5.1k; cache 507.4k/99%; p≈1.9ktok; ctx 48.9%; usable 49.8%; epoch turns 95; lifetime turns 381; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 629.2s
Time: model 624.4s, overhead 3.3s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈2.4ktok/9.7kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 512.5k; active 5.1k; cache 507.4k/99%; p≈1.9ktok; ctx 48.9%; usable 49.8%; epoch turns 95; lifetime turns 381; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 691.7s
Time: model 686.9s, overhead 3.3s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈2.4ktok/9.7kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 512.5k; active 5.1k; cache 507.4k/99%; p≈1.9ktok; ctx 48.9%; usable 49.8%; epoch turns 95; lifetime turns 381; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 754.2s
Time: model 749.4s, overhead 3.3s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈2.4ktok/9.7kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 512.5k; active 5.1k; cache 507.4k/99%; p≈1.9ktok; ctx 48.9%; usable 49.8%; epoch turns 95; lifetime turns 381; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 816.8s
Time: model 812.0s, overhead 3.3s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈2.4ktok/9.7kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 512.5k; active 5.1k; cache 507.4k/99%; p≈1.9ktok; ctx 48.9%; usable 49.8%; epoch turns 95; lifetime turns 381; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 879.1s
Time: model 874.4s, overhead 3.3s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈2.4ktok/9.7kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 512.5k; active 5.1k; cache 507.4k/99%; p≈1.9ktok; ctx 48.9%; usable 49.8%; epoch turns 95; lifetime turns 381; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 941.8s
Time: model 937.1s, overhead 3.3s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈2.4ktok/9.7kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 512.5k; active 5.1k; cache 507.4k/99%; p≈1.9ktok; ctx 48.9%; usable 49.8%; epoch turns 95; lifetime turns 381; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1004.3s
Time: model 999.6s, overhead 3.3s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈2.4ktok/9.7kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 512.5k; active 5.1k; cache 507.4k/99%; p≈1.9ktok; ctx 48.9%; usable 49.8%; epoch turns 95; lifetime turns 381; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1066.9s
Time: model 1062.1s, overhead 3.3s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈2.4ktok/9.7kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 512.5k; active 5.1k; cache 507.4k/99%; p≈1.9ktok; ctx 48.9%; usable 49.8%; epoch turns 95; lifetime turns 381; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1129.3s
Time: model 1124.5s, overhead 3.3s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈2.4ktok/9.7kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 512.5k; active 5.1k; cache 507.4k/99%; p≈1.9ktok; ctx 48.9%; usable 49.8%; epoch turns 95; lifetime turns 381; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1191.4s
Time: model 1186.7s, overhead 3.3s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈2.4ktok/9.7kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 512.5k; active 5.1k; cache 507.4k/99%; p≈1.9ktok; ctx 48.9%; usable 49.8%; epoch turns 95; lifetime turns 381; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
No


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (1):
- persistent_browser_call / pending / call_snmdU28CxeLe948Gbpz05Bo

Draft:
No worries — that makes sense.

And good, now we can push again without rationing every turn.

Current state is still pretty decent:
- Dudium ended in rejection after the viewing
- we saved the reusable **Selbstauskunft + SCHUFA + contract + salary slips**
- both fresh Garching listings were sent
- Neufahrn got weird form-state issues
- **Eching 168252005** was the next cleaner candidate to try

So we can just resume from there.

If you want, I’d continue with:
1. **Eching 168252005**
2. then either retry **Neufahrn 168398031** more carefully or search for fresh new ones again.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (18):
- persistent_chat_send_file / completed / /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-hybrid.pdf
- Regenerates hybrid filled ImmoScout PDF / completed / Regenerates hybrid filled ImmoScout PDF
- Success. Updated the following files:
M fill_immoscout_form_hybrid.py / completed / call_YTGVUn9bRSlTVqwtXYVnR5i
- Generates hybrid filled ImmoScout PDF / completed / Generates hybrid filled ImmoScout PDF
- Success. Updated the following files:
A fill_immoscout_form_hybrid.py / completed / call_0LPlyUfJZpbgxioDJVPIf4D
- Inspects PDF field hierarchy / completed / Inspects PDF field hierarchy
- immoscout-form-fields.txt / completed / /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/immoscout-form-fields.txt
- Dumps PDF field list to file / completed / Dumps PDF field list to file
- Counts PDF form fields / completed / Counts PDF form fields
- Lists remaining PDF form fields / completed / Lists remaining PDF form fields
- Lists PDF form field names / completed / Lists PDF form field names
- Inspects PDF AcroForm presence / completed / Inspects PDF AcroForm presence
- persistent_chat_send_file / completed / /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-blank-filled.pdf
- Generates filled blank ImmoScout PDF / completed / Generates filled blank ImmoScout PDF
- Success. Updated the following files:
M fill_immoscout_form_overlay.py / completed / call_zlbtHiTgnkIVtcVqntlFJcX
- immoscout-blank-mieterselbstauskunft.pdf / completed / /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/immoscout-blank-mieterselbstauskunft.pdf
- Downloads blank ImmoScout selbstauskunft PDF / completed / Downloads blank ImmoScout selbstauskunft PDF
- immoscout24-shortlist-2026-06-05.md / completed / /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/immoscout24-shortlist-2026-06-05.md

Draft:
No worries — that makes sense.

And good, now we can push again without rationing every turn.

Current state is still pretty decent:
- Dudium ended in rejection after the viewing
- we saved the reusable **Selbstauskunft + SCHUFA + contract + salary slips**
- both fresh Garching listings were sent
- Neufahrn got weird form-state issues
- **Eching 168252005** was the next cleaner candidate to try

So we can just resume from there.

If you want, I’d continue with:
1. **Eching 168252005**
2. then either retry **Neufahrn 168398031** more carefully or search for fresh new ones again.


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1235.1s
Time: model 1230.4s, overhead 3.3s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: i 202.1k o 152 cache 312.8k/61% est $0.5076; p≈2.4ktok/9.7kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 512.5k; active 5.1k; cache 507.4k/99%; p≈1.9ktok; ctx 48.9%; usable 49.8%; epoch turns 95; lifetime turns 381; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


No worries — that makes sense.

And good, now we can push again without rationing every turn.

Current state is still pretty decent:
- Dudium ended in rejection after the viewing
- we saved the reusable **Selbstauskunft + SCHUFA + contract + salary slips**
- both fresh Garching listings were sent
- Neufahrn got weird form-state issues
- **Eching 168252005** was the next cleaner candidate to try

So we can just resume from there.

If you want, I’d continue with:
1. **Eching 168252005**
2. then either retry **Neufahrn 168398031** more carefully or search for fresh new ones again.


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1236.2s
Time: model 1230.4s, overhead 5.8s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: i 202.1k o 152 cache 312.8k/61% est $0.5076; p≈2.4ktok/9.7kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 515.1k; active 202.3k; cache 312.8k/61%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 48.9%; usable 49.8%; epoch turns 95; lifetime turns 381; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


Please check if anyone replied and redo search in priority areas - it's been a few days and there will be new apartments


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Ctx: direct ACP session 515.1k; active 202.3k; cache 312.8k/61%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 48.9%; usable 49.8%; epoch turns 95; lifetime turns 381; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.1s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Ctx: direct ACP session 515.1k; active 202.3k; cache 312.8k/61%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 48.9%; usable 49.8%; epoch turns 95; lifetime turns 381; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.5s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Ctx: direct ACP session 515.1k; active 202.3k; cache 312.8k/61%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 48.9%; usable 49.8%; epoch turns 95; lifetime turns 381; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 2.5s
Time: overhead 2.5s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈2.4ktok/9.5kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 515.1k; active 202.3k; cache 312.8k/61%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 48.9%; usable 49.8%; epoch turns 95; lifetime turns 381; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Waiting for first model/tool update…


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
I


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (1):
- persistent_browser_start / in_progress / call_bGgIHOl4YE0tDQJHGUCMVwu

Draft:
I’m doing two things now:
1. check the real ImmoScout inbox for any new replies
2. refresh the priority search areas again for new listings:
- Garching
- Ismaning
- Oberschleißheim
- Unterschleißheim


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (1):
- persistent_browser_start / completed / call_bGgIHOl4YE0tDQJHGUCMVwu

Draft:
I’m doing two things now:
1. check the real ImmoScout inbox for any new replies
2. refresh the priority search areas again for new listings:
- Garching
- Ismaning
- Oberschleißheim
- Unterschleißheim


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (1):
- persistent_browser_start / completed / call_bGgIHOl4YE0tDQJHGUCMVwu

Draft:
I’m doing two things now:
1. check the real ImmoScout inbox for any new replies
2. refresh the priority search areas again for new listings:
- Garching
- Ismaning
- Oberschleißheim
- UnterschleißheimFresh


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (3):
- persistent_browser_start / completed / call_bGgIHOl4YE0tDQJHGUCMVwu
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_buI6mjvOdQa3tL56WN9a2hA
- persistent_browser_call / pending / call_g6sL1jzKSQFNMP0sVTs4lzP

Draft:
I’m doing two things now:
1. check the real ImmoScout inbox for any new replies
2. refresh the priority search areas again for new listings:
- Garching
- Ismaning
- Oberschleißheim
- UnterschleißheimFresh session is up and on the normal ImmoScout login page. I’m logging in first, then I’ll check replies and refresh the four priority areas.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (3):
- persistent_browser_start / completed / call_bGgIHOl4YE0tDQJHGUCMVwu
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_buI6mjvOdQa3tL56WN9a2hA
- persistent_browser_call / in_progress / call_g6sL1jzKSQFNMP0sVTs4lzP

Draft:
I’m doing two things now:
1. check the real ImmoScout inbox for any new replies
2. refresh the priority search areas again for new listings:
- Garching
- Ismaning
- Oberschleißheim
- UnterschleißheimFresh session is up and on the normal ImmoScout login page. I’m logging in first, then I’ll check replies and refresh the four priority areas.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (4):
- persistent_browser_start / completed / call_bGgIHOl4YE0tDQJHGUCMVwu
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_buI6mjvOdQa3tL56WN9a2hA
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_g6sL1jzKSQFNMP0sVTs4lzP
- persistent_browser_call / pending / call_dROvUFCkmQSc8sEcUbgqVN9

Draft:
I’m doing two things now:
1. check the real ImmoScout inbox for any new replies
2. refresh the priority search areas again for new listings:
- Garching
- Ismaning
- Oberschleißheim
- UnterschleißheimFresh session is up and on the normal ImmoScout login page. I’m logging in first, then I’ll check replies and refresh the four priority areas.


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 65.3s
Time: model 61.6s, overhead 2.5s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈2.4ktok/9.5kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 515.1k; active 202.3k; cache 312.8k/61%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 48.9%; usable 49.8%; epoch turns 95; lifetime turns 381; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (4):
- persistent_browser_start / completed / call_bGgIHOl4YE0tDQJHGUCMVwu
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_buI6mjvOdQa3tL56WN9a2hA
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_g6sL1jzKSQFNMP0sVTs4lzP
- persistent_browser_call / in_progress / call_dROvUFCkmQSc8sEcUbgqVN9

Draft:
I’m doing two things now:
1. check the real ImmoScout inbox for any new replies
2. refresh the priority search areas again for new listings:
- Garching
- Ismaning
- Oberschleißheim
- UnterschleißheimFresh session is up and on the normal ImmoScout login page. I’m logging in first, then I’ll check replies and refresh the four priority areas.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (4):
- persistent_browser_start / completed / call_bGgIHOl4YE0tDQJHGUCMVwu
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_buI6mjvOdQa3tL56WN9a2hA
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_g6sL1jzKSQFNMP0sVTs4lzP
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_dROvUFCkmQSc8sEcUbgqVN9

Draft:
I’m doing two things now:
1. check the real ImmoScout inbox for any new replies
2. refresh the priority search areas again for new listings:
- Garching
- Ismaning
- Oberschleißheim
- UnterschleißheimFresh session is up and on the normal ImmoScout login page. I’m logging in first, then I’ll check replies and refresh the four priority areas.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (4):
- persistent_browser_start / completed / call_bGgIHOl4YE0tDQJHGUCMVwu
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_buI6mjvOdQa3tL56WN9a2hA
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_g6sL1jzKSQFNMP0sVTs4lzP
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_dROvUFCkmQSc8sEcUbgqVN9

Draft:
I’m doing two things now:
1. check the real ImmoScout inbox for any new replies
2. refresh the priority search areas again for new listings:
- Garching
- Ismaning
- Oberschleißheim
- UnterschleißheimFresh session is up and on the normal ImmoScout login page. I’m logging in first, then I’ll check replies and refresh the four priority areas.Cookie


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (5):
- persistent_browser_start / completed / call_bGgIHOl4YE0tDQJHGUCMVwu
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_buI6mjvOdQa3tL56WN9a2hA
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_g6sL1jzKSQFNMP0sVTs4lzP
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_dROvUFCkmQSc8sEcUbgqVN9
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_nLLkMQimnt418pmX80lWCKw

Draft:
I’m doing two things now:
1. check the real ImmoScout inbox for any new replies
2. refresh the priority search areas again for new listings:
- Garching
- Ismaning
- Oberschleißheim
- UnterschleißheimFresh session is up and on the normal ImmoScout login page. I’m logging in first, then I’ll check replies and refresh the four priority areas.Cookie layer popped back up on the password step and blocked the button. I’m clearing it and continuing the login.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (6):
- persistent_browser_start / completed / call_bGgIHOl4YE0tDQJHGUCMVwu
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_buI6mjvOdQa3tL56WN9a2hA
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_g6sL1jzKSQFNMP0sVTs4lzP
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_dROvUFCkmQSc8sEcUbgqVN9
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_nLLkMQimnt418pmX80lWCKw
- persistent_browser_call / pending / call_rZRP6ltfF3aV72kutyPueoQ

Draft:
I’m doing two things now:
1. check the real ImmoScout inbox for any new replies
2. refresh the priority search areas again for new listings:
- Garching
- Ismaning
- Oberschleißheim
- UnterschleißheimFresh session is up and on the normal ImmoScout login page. I’m logging in first, then I’ll check replies and refresh the four priority areas.Cookie layer popped back up on the password step and blocked the button. I’m clearing it and continuing the login.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (6):
- persistent_browser_start / completed / call_bGgIHOl4YE0tDQJHGUCMVwu
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_buI6mjvOdQa3tL56WN9a2hA
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_g6sL1jzKSQFNMP0sVTs4lzP
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_dROvUFCkmQSc8sEcUbgqVN9
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_nLLkMQimnt418pmX80lWCKw
- persistent_browser_call / in_progress / call_rZRP6ltfF3aV72kutyPueoQ

Draft:
I’m doing two things now:
1. check the real ImmoScout inbox for any new replies
2. refresh the priority search areas again for new listings:
- Garching
- Ismaning
- Oberschleißheim
- UnterschleißheimFresh session is up and on the normal ImmoScout login page. I’m logging in first, then I’ll check replies and refresh the four priority areas.Cookie layer popped back up on the password step and blocked the button. I’m clearing it and continuing the login.


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 127.5s
Time: model 123.8s, overhead 2.5s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈2.4ktok/9.5kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 515.1k; active 202.3k; cache 312.8k/61%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 49.1%; usable 50.1%; epoch turns 96; lifetime turns 382; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (6):
- persistent_browser_start / completed / call_bGgIHOl4YE0tDQJHGUCMVwu
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_buI6mjvOdQa3tL56WN9a2hA
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_g6sL1jzKSQFNMP0sVTs4lzP
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_dROvUFCkmQSc8sEcUbgqVN9
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_nLLkMQimnt418pmX80lWCKw
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_rZRP6ltfF3aV72kutyPueoQ

Draft:
I’m doing two things now:
1. check the real ImmoScout inbox for any new replies
2. refresh the priority search areas again for new listings:
- Garching
- Ismaning
- Oberschleißheim
- UnterschleißheimFresh session is up and on the normal ImmoScout login page. I’m logging in first, then I’ll check replies and refresh the four priority areas.Cookie layer popped back up on the password step and blocked the button. I’m clearing it and continuing the login.Logged


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (7):
- persistent_browser_start / completed / call_bGgIHOl4YE0tDQJHGUCMVwu
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_buI6mjvOdQa3tL56WN9a2hA
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_g6sL1jzKSQFNMP0sVTs4lzP
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_dROvUFCkmQSc8sEcUbgqVN9
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_nLLkMQimnt418pmX80lWCKw
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_rZRP6ltfF3aV72kutyPueoQ
- persistent_browser_snapshot / in_progress / call_cPph8e2qkHwf2zNfpl7UA7g

Draft:
I’m doing two things now:
1. check the real ImmoScout inbox for any new replies
2. refresh the priority search areas again for new listings:
- Garching
- Ismaning
- Oberschleißheim
- UnterschleißheimFresh session is up and on the normal ImmoScout login page. I’m logging in first, then I’ll check replies and refresh the four priority areas.Cookie layer popped back up on the password step and blocked the button. I’m clearing it and continuing the login.Logged in. I’m checking the inbox for new replies first, then I’ll refresh the four priority searches.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (7):
- persistent_browser_start / completed / call_bGgIHOl4YE0tDQJHGUCMVwu
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_buI6mjvOdQa3tL56WN9a2hA
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_g6sL1jzKSQFNMP0sVTs4lzP
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_dROvUFCkmQSc8sEcUbgqVN9
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_nLLkMQimnt418pmX80lWCKw
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_rZRP6ltfF3aV72kutyPueoQ
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_cPph8e2qkHwf2zNfpl7UA7g

Draft:
I’m doing two things now:
1. check the real ImmoScout inbox for any new replies
2. refresh the priority search areas again for new listings:
- Garching
- Ismaning
- Oberschleißheim
- UnterschleißheimFresh session is up and on the normal ImmoScout login page. I’m logging in first, then I’ll check replies and refresh the four priority areas.Cookie layer popped back up on the password step and blocked the button. I’m clearing it and continuing the login.Logged in. I’m checking the inbox for new replies first, then I’ll refresh the four priority searches.Reply


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (8):
- persistent_browser_start / completed / call_bGgIHOl4YE0tDQJHGUCMVwu
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_buI6mjvOdQa3tL56WN9a2hA
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_g6sL1jzKSQFNMP0sVTs4lzP
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_dROvUFCkmQSc8sEcUbgqVN9
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_nLLkMQimnt418pmX80lWCKw
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_rZRP6ltfF3aV72kutyPueoQ
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_cPph8e2qkHwf2zNfpl7UA7g
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_CknxsfhLa5ffH0KQ31L3GA3

Draft:
I’m doing two things now:
1. check the real ImmoScout inbox for any new replies
2. refresh the priority search areas again for new listings:
- Garching
- Ismaning
- Oberschleißheim
- UnterschleißheimFresh session is up and on the normal ImmoScout login page. I’m logging in first, then I’ll check replies and refresh the four priority areas.Cookie layer popped back up on the password step and blocked the button. I’m clearing it and continuing the login.Logged in. I’m checking the inbox for new replies first, then I’ll refresh the four priority searches.Reply update first:
- **rosemarie mahner** replied with a **rejection**
- **Laura Schmid / Eching** got auto-deactivated by ImmoScout, so that one is effectively dead too

Now I’m refreshing the four priority areas again in this logged-in session so I can see if any new apartments appeared since the last pass.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (9):
- persistent_browser_start / completed / call_bGgIHOl4YE0tDQJHGUCMVwu
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_buI6mjvOdQa3tL56WN9a2hA
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_g6sL1jzKSQFNMP0sVTs4lzP
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_dROvUFCkmQSc8sEcUbgqVN9
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_nLLkMQimnt418pmX80lWCKw
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_rZRP6ltfF3aV72kutyPueoQ
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_cPph8e2qkHwf2zNfpl7UA7g
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_CknxsfhLa5ffH0KQ31L3GA3
- persistent_browser_snapshot / in_progress / call_K6TtO3rVF8kSgwP7alN7891

Draft:
I’m doing two things now:
1. check the real ImmoScout inbox for any new replies
2. refresh the priority search areas again for new listings:
- Garching
- Ismaning
- Oberschleißheim
- UnterschleißheimFresh session is up and on the normal ImmoScout login page. I’m logging in first, then I’ll check replies and refresh the four priority areas.Cookie layer popped back up on the password step and blocked the button. I’m clearing it and continuing the login.Logged in. I’m checking the inbox for new replies first, then I’ll refresh the four priority searches.Reply update first:
- **rosemarie mahner** replied with a **rejection**
- **Laura Schmid / Eching** got auto-deactivated by ImmoScout, so that one is effectively dead too

Now I’m refreshing the four priority areas again in this logged-in session so I can see if any new apartments appeared since the last pass.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (9):
- persistent_browser_start / completed / call_bGgIHOl4YE0tDQJHGUCMVwu
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_buI6mjvOdQa3tL56WN9a2hA
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_g6sL1jzKSQFNMP0sVTs4lzP
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_dROvUFCkmQSc8sEcUbgqVN9
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_nLLkMQimnt418pmX80lWCKw
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_rZRP6ltfF3aV72kutyPueoQ
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_cPph8e2qkHwf2zNfpl7UA7g
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_CknxsfhLa5ffH0KQ31L3GA3
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_K6TtO3rVF8kSgwP7alN7891

Draft:
I’m doing two things now:
1. check the real ImmoScout inbox for any new replies
2. refresh the priority search areas again for new listings:
- Garching
- Ismaning
- Oberschleißheim
- UnterschleißheimFresh session is up and on the normal ImmoScout login page. I’m logging in first, then I’ll check replies and refresh the four priority areas.Cookie layer popped back up on the password step and blocked the button. I’m clearing it and continuing the login.Logged in. I’m checking the inbox for new replies first, then I’ll refresh the four priority searches.Reply update first:
- **rosemarie mahner** replied with a **rejection**
- **Laura Schmid / Eching** got auto-deactivated by ImmoScout, so that one is effectively dead too

Now I’m refreshing the four priority areas again in this logged-in session so I can see if any new apartments appeared since the last pass.The


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (10):
- persistent_browser_start / completed / call_bGgIHOl4YE0tDQJHGUCMVwu
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_buI6mjvOdQa3tL56WN9a2hA
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_g6sL1jzKSQFNMP0sVTs4lzP
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_dROvUFCkmQSc8sEcUbgqVN9
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_nLLkMQimnt418pmX80lWCKw
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_rZRP6ltfF3aV72kutyPueoQ
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_cPph8e2qkHwf2zNfpl7UA7g
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_CknxsfhLa5ffH0KQ31L3GA3
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_K6TtO3rVF8kSgwP7alN7891
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_ydBKNTyVB4pVqAVCIDsOhOq

Draft:
I’m doing two things now:
1. check the real ImmoScout inbox for any new replies
2. refresh the priority search areas again for new listings:
- Garching
- Ismaning
- Oberschleißheim
- UnterschleißheimFresh session is up and on the normal ImmoScout login page. I’m logging in first, then I’ll check replies and refresh the four priority areas.Cookie layer popped back up on the password step and blocked the button. I’m clearing it and continuing the login.Logged in. I’m checking the inbox for new replies first, then I’ll refresh the four priority searches.Reply update first:
- **rosemarie mahner** replied with a **rejection**
- **Laura Schmid / Eching** got auto-deactivated by ImmoScout, so that one is effectively dead too

Now I’m refreshing the four priority areas again in this logged-in session so I can see if any new apartments appeared since the last pass.The search deep-link triggered the robot gate again, which is annoying but consistent with ImmoScout. I’m checking whether it’s the simple hCaptcha/checkbox variant or a harder block before I decide the cleanest refresh route.


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 189.5s
Time: model 185.8s, overhead 2.5s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈2.4ktok/9.5kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 515.1k; active 202.3k; cache 312.8k/61%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 49.1%; usable 50.1%; epoch turns 96; lifetime turns 382; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (11):
- persistent_browser_start / completed / call_bGgIHOl4YE0tDQJHGUCMVwu
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_buI6mjvOdQa3tL56WN9a2hA
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_g6sL1jzKSQFNMP0sVTs4lzP
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_dROvUFCkmQSc8sEcUbgqVN9
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_nLLkMQimnt418pmX80lWCKw
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_rZRP6ltfF3aV72kutyPueoQ
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_cPph8e2qkHwf2zNfpl7UA7g
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_CknxsfhLa5ffH0KQ31L3GA3
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_K6TtO3rVF8kSgwP7alN7891
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_ydBKNTyVB4pVqAVCIDsOhOq
- persistent_browser_call / in_progress / call_lwxuxAAxxNgK5m6sHSgNOYk

Draft:
I’m doing two things now:
1. check the real ImmoScout inbox for any new replies
2. refresh the priority search areas again for new listings:
- Garching
- Ismaning
- Oberschleißheim
- UnterschleißheimFresh session is up and on the normal ImmoScout login page. I’m logging in first, then I’ll check replies and refresh the four priority areas.Cookie layer popped back up on the password step and blocked the button. I’m clearing it and continuing the login.Logged in. I’m checking the inbox for new replies first, then I’ll refresh the four priority searches.Reply update first:
- **rosemarie mahner** replied with a **rejection**
- **Laura Schmid / Eching** got auto-deactivated by ImmoScout, so that one is effectively dead too

Now I’m refreshing the four priority areas again in this logged-in session so I can see if any new apartments appeared since the last pass.The search deep-link triggered the robot gate again, which is annoying but consistent with ImmoScout. I’m checking whether it’s the simple hCaptcha/checkbox variant or a harder block before I decide the cleanest refresh route.I checked the inbox first, and there are **2 notable updates** since the last time:
- **rosemarie mahner** → rejection
- **Laura Schmid / Eching** → listing deactivated auto-message from ImmoScout

Now I’m refreshing **Ismaning / Oberschleißheim / Unterschleißheim** too, so I can give you a proper full priority-area update, not just Garching.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (12):
- persistent_browser_start / completed / call_bGgIHOl4YE0tDQJHGUCMVwu
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_buI6mjvOdQa3tL56WN9a2hA
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_g6sL1jzKSQFNMP0sVTs4lzP
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_dROvUFCkmQSc8sEcUbgqVN9
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_nLLkMQimnt418pmX80lWCKw
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_rZRP6ltfF3aV72kutyPueoQ
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_cPph8e2qkHwf2zNfpl7UA7g
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_CknxsfhLa5ffH0KQ31L3GA3
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_K6TtO3rVF8kSgwP7alN7891
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_ydBKNTyVB4pVqAVCIDsOhOq
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_lwxuxAAxxNgK5m6sHSgNOYk
- persistent_browser_call / pending / call_R2WX5neI5pRY0RgS8AMhLwR

Draft:
I’m doing two things now:
1. check the real ImmoScout inbox for any new replies
2. refresh the priority search areas again for new listings:
- Garching
- Ismaning
- Oberschleißheim
- UnterschleißheimFresh session is up and on the normal ImmoScout login page. I’m logging in first, then I’ll check replies and refresh the four priority areas.Cookie layer popped back up on the password step and blocked the button. I’m clearing it and continuing the login.Logged in. I’m checking the inbox for new replies first, then I’ll refresh the four priority searches.Reply update first:
- **rosemarie mahner** replied with a **rejection**
- **Laura Schmid / Eching** got auto-deactivated by ImmoScout, so that one is effectively dead too

Now I’m refreshing the four priority areas again in this logged-in session so I can see if any new apartments appeared since the last pass.The search deep-link triggered the robot gate again, which is annoying but consistent with ImmoScout. I’m checking whether it’s the simple hCaptcha/checkbox variant or a harder block before I decide the cleanest refresh route.I checked the inbox first, and there are **2 notable updates** since the last time:
- **rosemarie mahner** → rejection
- **Laura Schmid / Eching** → listing deactivated auto-message from ImmoScout

Now I’m refreshing **Ismaning / Oberschleißheim / Unterschleißheim** too, so I can give you a proper full priority-area update, not just Garching.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (13):
- persistent_browser_start / completed / call_bGgIHOl4YE0tDQJHGUCMVwu
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_buI6mjvOdQa3tL56WN9a2hA
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_g6sL1jzKSQFNMP0sVTs4lzP
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_dROvUFCkmQSc8sEcUbgqVN9
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_nLLkMQimnt418pmX80lWCKw
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_rZRP6ltfF3aV72kutyPueoQ
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_cPph8e2qkHwf2zNfpl7UA7g
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_CknxsfhLa5ffH0KQ31L3GA3
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_K6TtO3rVF8kSgwP7alN7891
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_ydBKNTyVB4pVqAVCIDsOhOq
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_lwxuxAAxxNgK5m6sHSgNOYk
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_R2WX5neI5pRY0RgS8AMhLwR
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_Knxl4GyWtdtpUDs5yVToFXS

Draft:
I’m doing two things now:
1. check the real ImmoScout inbox for any new replies
2. refresh the priority search areas again for new listings:
- Garching
- Ismaning
- Oberschleißheim
- UnterschleißheimFresh session is up and on the normal ImmoScout login page. I’m logging in first, then I’ll check replies and refresh the four priority areas.Cookie layer popped back up on the password step and blocked the button. I’m clearing it and continuing the login.Logged in. I’m checking the inbox for new replies first, then I’ll refresh the four priority searches.Reply update first:
- **rosemarie mahner** replied with a **rejection**
- **Laura Schmid / Eching** got auto-deactivated by ImmoScout, so that one is effectively dead too

Now I’m refreshing the four priority areas again in this logged-in session so I can see if any new apartments appeared since the last pass.The search deep-link triggered the robot gate again, which is annoying but consistent with ImmoScout. I’m checking whether it’s the simple hCaptcha/checkbox variant or a harder block before I decide the cleanest refresh route.I checked the inbox first, and there are **2 notable updates** since the last time:
- **rosemarie mahner** → rejection
- **Laura Schmid / Eching** → listing deactivated auto-message from ImmoScout

Now I’m refreshing **Ismaning / Oberschleißheim / Unterschleißheim** too, so I can give you a proper full priority-area update, not just Garching.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (13):
- persistent_browser_start / completed / call_bGgIHOl4YE0tDQJHGUCMVwu
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_buI6mjvOdQa3tL56WN9a2hA
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_g6sL1jzKSQFNMP0sVTs4lzP
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_dROvUFCkmQSc8sEcUbgqVN9
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_nLLkMQimnt418pmX80lWCKw
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_rZRP6ltfF3aV72kutyPueoQ
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_cPph8e2qkHwf2zNfpl7UA7g
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_CknxsfhLa5ffH0KQ31L3GA3
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_K6TtO3rVF8kSgwP7alN7891
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_ydBKNTyVB4pVqAVCIDsOhOq
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_lwxuxAAxxNgK5m6sHSgNOYk
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_R2WX5neI5pRY0RgS8AMhLwR
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_Knxl4GyWtdtpUDs5yVToFXS

Draft:
I’m doing two things now:
1. check the real ImmoScout inbox for any new replies
2. refresh the priority search areas again for new listings:
- Garching
- Ismaning
- Oberschleißheim
- UnterschleißheimFresh session is up and on the normal ImmoScout login page. I’m logging in first, then I’ll check replies and refresh the four priority areas.Cookie layer popped back up on the password step and blocked the button. I’m clearing it and continuing the login.Logged in. I’m checking the inbox for new replies first, then I’ll refresh the four priority searches.Reply update first:
- **rosemarie mahner** replied with a **rejection**
- **Laura Schmid / Eching** got auto-deactivated by ImmoScout, so that one is effectively dead too

Now I’m refreshing the four priority areas again in this logged-in session so I can see if any new apartments appeared since the last pass.The search deep-link triggered the robot gate again, which is annoying but consistent with ImmoScout. I’m checking whether it’s the simple hCaptcha/checkbox variant or a harder block before I decide the cleanest refresh route.I checked the inbox first, and there are **2 notable updates** since the last time:
- **rosemarie mahner** → rejection
- **Laura Schmid / Eching** → listing deactivated auto-message from ImmoScout

Now I’m refreshing **Ismaning / Oberschleißheim / Unterschleißheim** too, so I can give you a proper full priority-area update, not just Garching.All


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (14):
- persistent_browser_start / completed / call_bGgIHOl4YE0tDQJHGUCMVwu
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_buI6mjvOdQa3tL56WN9a2hA
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_g6sL1jzKSQFNMP0sVTs4lzP
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_dROvUFCkmQSc8sEcUbgqVN9
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_nLLkMQimnt418pmX80lWCKw
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_rZRP6ltfF3aV72kutyPueoQ
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_cPph8e2qkHwf2zNfpl7UA7g
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_CknxsfhLa5ffH0KQ31L3GA3
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_K6TtO3rVF8kSgwP7alN7891
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_ydBKNTyVB4pVqAVCIDsOhOq
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_lwxuxAAxxNgK5m6sHSgNOYk
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_R2WX5neI5pRY0RgS8AMhLwR
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_Knxl4GyWtdtpUDs5yVToFXS
- persistent_browser_call / pending / call_u17RXOzfO0dmGZGMdQmto3H

Draft:
I’m doing two things now:
1. check the real ImmoScout inbox for any new replies
2. refresh the priority search areas again for new listings:
- Garching
- Ismaning
- Oberschleißheim
- UnterschleißheimFresh session is up and on the normal ImmoScout login page. I’m logging in first, then I’ll check replies and refresh the four priority areas.Cookie layer popped back up on the password step and blocked the button. I’m clearing it and continuing the login.Logged in. I’m checking the inbox for new replies first, then I’ll refresh the four priority searches.Reply update first:
- **rosemarie mahner** replied with a **rejection**
- **Laura Schmid / Eching** got auto-deactivated by ImmoScout, so that one is effectively dead too

Now I’m refreshing the four priority areas again in this logged-in session so I can see if any new apartments appeared since the last pass.The search deep-link triggered the robot gate again, which is annoying but consistent with ImmoScout. I’m checking whether it’s the simple hCaptcha/checkbox variant or a harder block before I decide the cleanest refresh route.I checked the inbox first, and there are **2 notable updates** since the last time:
- **rosemarie mahner** → rejection
- **Laura Schmid / Eching** → listing deactivated auto-message from ImmoScout

Now I’m refreshing **Ismaning / Oberschleißheim / Unterschleißheim** too, so I can give you a proper full priority-area update, not just Garching.All four priority result pages are refreshed again. I’m extracting their current cards now so I can tell you if anything new showed up beyond the Garching ones we already sent.


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 252.0s
Time: model 248.3s, overhead 2.5s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat
Turn: p≈2.4ktok/9.5kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 515.1k; active 202.3k; cache 312.8k/61%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 49.1%; usable 50.1%; epoch turns 96; lifetime turns 382; provider compacted 883.1k→79.8k at 2026-06-11T12:52:51.756169Z


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (18):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_dROvUFCkmQSc8sEcUbgqVN9
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_nLLkMQimnt418pmX80lWCKw
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_rZRP6ltfF3aV72kutyPueoQ
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_cPph8e2qkHwf2zNfpl7UA7g
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_CknxsfhLa5ffH0KQ31L3GA3
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_K6TtO3rVF8kSgwP7alN7891
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_ydBKNTyVB4pVqAVCIDsOhOq
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_lwxuxAAxxNgK5m6sHSgNOYk
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_R2WX5neI5pRY0RgS8AMhLwR
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_Knxl4GyWtdtpUDs5yVToFXS
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_u17RXOzfO0dmGZGMdQmto3H
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_M2j3EEqciGV0crx7xCuyMpo
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_wIcvkQgdGlRljNPgA6sFUeg
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_UhySxux1rE66Jp1olKMG6ik
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_8mIV0SdR9lZxFPcxq3AoLte
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_jL3cmh6RJyQKSbuIgrq3qdu
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_dhkPoBFXQbcpsLqmud9F8aG
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_XlPiNrzFQ3zH1ETTMZVkIn1

Draft:
I’m doing two things now:
1. check the real ImmoScout inbox for any new replies
2. refresh the priority search areas again for new listings:
- Garching
- Ismaning
- Oberschleißheim
- UnterschleißheimFresh session is up and on the normal ImmoScout login page. I’m logging in first, then I’ll check replies and refresh the four priority areas.Cookie layer popped back up on the password step and blocked the button. I’m clearing it and continuing the login.Logged in. I’m checking the inbox for new replies first, then I’ll refresh the four priority searches.Reply update first:
- **rosemarie mahner** replied with a **rejection**
- **Laura Schmid / Eching** got auto-deactivated by ImmoScout, so that one is effectively dead too

Now I’m refreshing the four priority areas again in this logged-in session so I can see if any new apartments appeared since the last pass.The search deep-link triggered the robot gate again, which is annoying but consistent with ImmoScout. I’m checking whether it’s the simple hCaptcha/checkbox variant or a harder block before I decide the cleanest refresh route.I checked the inbox first, and there are **2 notable updates** since the last time:
- **rosemarie mahner** → rejection
- **Laura Schmid / Eching** → listing deactivated auto-message from ImmoScout

Now I’m refreshing **Ismaning / Oberschleißheim / Unterschleißheim** too, so I can give you a proper full priority-area update, not just Garching.All four priority result pages are refreshed again. I’m extracting their current cards now so I can tell you if anything new showed up beyond the Garching ones we already sent.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (18):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_dROvUFCkmQSc8sEcUbgqVN9
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_nLLkMQimnt418pmX80lWCKw
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_rZRP6ltfF3aV72kutyPueoQ
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_cPph8e2qkHwf2zNfpl7UA7g
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_CknxsfhLa5ffH0KQ31L3GA3
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_K6TtO3rVF8kSgwP7alN7891
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_ydBKNTyVB4pVqAVCIDsOhOq
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_lwxuxAAxxNgK5m6sHSgNOYk
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_R2WX5neI5pRY0RgS8AMhLwR
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_Knxl4GyWtdtpUDs5yVToFXS
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_u17RXOzfO0dmGZGMdQmto3H
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_M2j3EEqciGV0crx7xCuyMpo
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_wIcvkQgdGlRljNPgA6sFUeg
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_UhySxux1rE66Jp1olKMG6ik
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_8mIV0SdR9lZxFPcxq3AoLte
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_jL3cmh6RJyQKSbuIgrq3qdu
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_dhkPoBFXQbcpsLqmud9F8aG
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_XlPiNrzFQ3zH1ETTMZVkIn1

Draft:
I’m doing two things now:
1. check the real ImmoScout inbox for any new replies
2. refresh the priority search areas again for new listings:
- Garching
- Ismaning
- Oberschleißheim
- UnterschleißheimFresh session is up and on the normal ImmoScout login page. I’m logging in first, then I’ll check replies and refresh the four priority areas.Cookie layer popped back up on the password step and blocked the button. I’m clearing it and continuing the login.Logged in. I’m checking the inbox for new replies first, then I’ll refresh the four priority searches.Reply update first:
- **rosemarie mahner** replied with a **rejection**
- **Laura Schmid / Eching** got auto-deactivated by ImmoScout, so that one is effectively dead too

Now I’m refreshing the four priority areas again in this logged-in session so I can see if any new apartments appeared since the last pass.The search deep-link triggered the robot gate again, which is annoying but consistent with ImmoScout. I’m checking whether it’s the simple hCaptcha/checkbox variant or a harder block before I decide the cleanest refresh route.I checked the inbox first, and there are **2 notable updates** since the last time:
- **rosemarie mahner** → rejection
- **Laura Schmid / Eching** → listing deactivated auto-message from ImmoScout

Now I’m refreshing **Ismaning / Oberschleißheim / Unterschleißheim** too, so I can give you a proper full priority-area update, not just Garching.All four priority result pages are refreshed again. I’m extracting their current cards now so I can tell you if anything new showed up beyond the Garching ones we already sent.Yes


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (18):
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_dROvUFCkmQSc8sEcUbgqVN9
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_nLLkMQimnt418pmX80lWCKw
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_rZRP6ltfF3aV72kutyPueoQ
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_cPph8e2qkHwf2zNfpl7UA7g
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_CknxsfhLa5ffH0KQ31L3GA3
- persistent_browser_snapshot / completed / call_K6TtO3rVF8kSgwP7alN7891
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_ydBKNTyVB4pVqAVCIDsOhOq
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_lwxuxAAxxNgK5m6sHSgNOYk
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_R2WX5neI5pRY0RgS8AMhLwR
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_Knxl4GyWtdtpUDs5yVToFXS
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_u17RXOzfO0dmGZGMdQmto3H
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_M2j3EEqciGV0crx7xCuyMpo
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_wIcvkQgdGlRljNPgA6sFUeg
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_UhySxux1rE66Jp1olKMG6ik
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_8mIV0SdR9lZxFPcxq3AoLte
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_jL3cmh6RJyQKSbuIgrq3qdu
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_dhkPoBFXQbcpsLqmud9F8aG
- persistent_browser_call / completed / call_XlPiNrzFQ3zH1ETTMZVkIn1

Draft:
I’m doing two things now:
1. check the real ImmoScout inbox for any new replies
2. refresh the priority search areas again for new listings:
- Garching
- Ismaning
- Oberschleißheim
- UnterschleißheimFresh session is up and on the normal ImmoScout login page. I’m logging in first, then I’ll check replies and refresh the four priority areas.Cookie layer popped back up on the password step and blocked the button. I’m clearing it and continuing the login.Logged in. I’m checking the inbox for new replies first, then I’ll refresh the four priority searches.Reply update first:
- **rosemarie mahner** replied with a **rejection**
- **Laura Schmid / Eching** got auto-deactivated by ImmoScout, so that one is effectively dead too

Now I’m refreshing the four priority areas again in this logged-in session so I can see if any new apartments appeared since the last pass.The search deep-link triggered the robot gate again, which is annoying but consistent with ImmoScout. I’m checking whether it’s the simple hCaptcha/checkbox variant or a harder block before I decide the cleanest refresh route.I checked the inbox first, and there are **2 notable updates** since the last time:
- **rosemarie mahner** → rejection
- **Laura Schmid / Eching** → listing deactivated auto-message from ImmoScout

Now I’m refreshing **Ismaning / Oberschleißheim / Unterschleißheim** too, so I can give you a proper full priority-area update, not just Garching.All four priority result pages are refreshed again. I’m extracting their current cards now so I can tell you if anything new showed up beyond the Garching ones we already sent.Yes — I checked both the **inbox** and the **priority areas** again.

## New replies
Since the last check:
- **rosemarie mahner** → **rejection**
- **Laura Schmid / Eching** → **auto-deactivated listing** message from ImmoScout

So there was no new positive reply in this batch.

## Fresh priority-area scan
### Garching
No new clear jackpot beyond the two Garching listings we already just sent.

New/visible things:
- **168673928** — **2,5 Zi**, **105 m²**, **1.930 €**
  - private
  - too expensive
- **168478363** — **2 Zi**, **56 m²**
  - but **Nachvermietung**
- the two good Garching ones are already sent:
  - **168496704**
  - **168495316**

### Ismaning
One actual new 2-room option:
- **168569802**
  - **2 Zi**
  - **57 m²**
  - **1.390 €**
  - **Erstbezug**
  - private
  - but this is clearly in the expensive tier

Other than that,