* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 6.6s
Time: model 5.0s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.7ktok/10.9kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 209.7k; active 203.0k; cache 6.7k/3%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 20.0%; usable 20.4%; observed turns 25; actual turns 54


📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Waiting for first model/tool update…


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP prompt started (4.6s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 209.7k; active 203.0k; cache 6.7k/3%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 20.0%; usable 20.4%; observed turns 25; actual turns 54
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first session update (4.3s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 209.7k; active 203.0k; cache 6.7k/3%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 20.0%; usable 20.4%; observed turns 25; actual turns 54
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first visible text (4.3s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 209.7k; active 203.0k; cache 6.7k/3%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 20.0%; usable 20.4%; observed turns 25; actual turns 54
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 209.7k; active 203.0k; cache 6.7k/3%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 20.0%; usable 20.4%; observed turns 25; actual turns 54
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Yeah


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 12.2s
Time: model 10.7s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.7ktok/10.9kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 209.7k; active 203.0k; cache 6.7k/3%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 20.0%; usable 20.4%; observed turns 25; actual turns 54


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Yeah, which is pretty ironic and supports your point.

That suggests the system is overreacting to normal-looking incomplete endings badly enough that even a basically understandable draft can get chopped and then reclassified as failure.


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 16.0s
Time: model 14.4s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 212.1k o 46 est $0.5310; p≈2.7ktok/10.9kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 209.7k; active 203.0k; cache 6.7k/3%; p≈2.4ktok; ctx 20.0%; usable 20.4%; observed turns 25; actual turns 54


Yeah, which is pretty ironic and supports your point.

That suggests the system is overreacting to normal-looking incomplete endings badly enough that even a basically understandable draft can get chopped and then reclassified as failure.


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 16.6s
Time: model 14.4s, overhead 2.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 212.1k o 46 est $0.5310; p≈2.7ktok/10.9kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 212.2k; active 212.2k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 20.0%; usable 20.4%; observed turns 25; actual turns 54


But you see, your last message was actually truncated both in draft and in final, and the status panel still shows it as 'done' so it's not really the same issue


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 212.2k; active 212.2k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 20.2%; usable 20.6%; observed turns 26; actual turns 54


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 212.2k; active 212.2k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 20.2%; usable 20.6%; observed turns 26; actual turns 54


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.7s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 212.2k; active 212.2k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 20.2%; usable 20.6%; observed turns 26; actual turns 54


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.1s
Time: overhead 1.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 212.2k; active 212.2k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 20.2%; usable 20.6%; observed turns 26; actual turns 54


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP load session start (1.3s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 212.2k; active 212.2k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 20.2%; usable 20.6%; observed turns 26; actual turns 54
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP replay drain done (4.6s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 212.2k; active 212.2k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 20.2%; usable 20.6%; observed turns 26; actual turns 55
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 6.6s
Time: model 5.0s, overhead 1.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 212.2k; active 212.2k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 20.2%; usable 20.6%; observed turns 26; actual turns 55


📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Waiting for first model/tool update…


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP prompt started (4.6s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 212.2k; active 212.2k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 20.2%; usable 20.6%; observed turns 26; actual turns 55
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 12.3s
Time: model 10.7s, overhead 1.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 212.2k; active 212.2k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 20.2%; usable 20.6%; observed turns 26; actual turns 55


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first session update (8.4s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 212.2k; active 212.2k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 20.2%; usable 20.6%; observed turns 26; actual turns 55
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first visible text (10.0s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 212.2k; active 212.2k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 20.2%; usable 20.6%; observed turns 26; actual turns 55
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 212.2k; active 212.2k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 20.2%; usable 20.6%; observed turns 26; actual turns 55
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Yeah


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 17.7s
Time: model 16.1s, overhead 1.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 212.2k; active 212.2k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 20.2%; usable 20.6%; observed turns 26; actual turns 55


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Yeah, good catch — that’s a different failure mode.

What you’re describing is:

- the draft was already truncated
- the final was also truncated
- but the panel still marked the turn as **done**

So in that case the system did **not** reject the answer as suspicious. It


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 23.6s
Time: model 22.0s, overhead 1.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 212.2k; active 212.2k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 20.2%; usable 20.6%; observed turns 26; actual turns 55


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Yeah, good catch — that’s a different failure mode.

What you’re describing is:

- the draft was already truncated
- the final was also truncated
- but the panel still marked the turn as **done**

So in that case the system did **not** reject the answer as suspicious. It believed the turn completed successfully, and the truncation happened **inside a supposedly successful path**.

So we likely have at least two separate bugs:

1. **Heuristic false failure**
   - output exists
   - daemon says “no final answer” / suspicious trunc


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Yeah, good catch — that’s a different failure mode.

What you’re describing is:

- the draft was already truncated
- the final was also truncated
- but the panel still marked the turn as **done**

So in that case the system did **not** reject the answer as suspicious. It believed the turn completed successfully, and the truncation happened **inside a supposedly successful path**.

So we likely have at least two separate bugs:

1. **Heuristic false failure**
   - output exists
   - daemon says “no final answer” / suspicious truncation

2. **Silent successful truncation**
   - output is actually cut off
   - but the system still marks the turn as done

The second one is worse in a way, because it means:
- completion accounting says success
- but the delivered content is still incomplete

So yes, you’re right: not


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 29.6s
Time: model 28.1s, overhead 1.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 212.2k; active 212.2k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 20.2%; usable 20.6%; observed turns 26; actual turns 55


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Yeah, good catch — that’s a different failure mode.

What you’re describing is:

- the draft was already truncated
- the final was also truncated
- but the panel still marked the turn as **done**

So in that case the system did **not** reject the answer as suspicious. It believed the turn completed successfully, and the truncation happened **inside a supposedly successful path**.

So we likely have at least two separate bugs:

1. **Heuristic false failure**
   - output exists
   - daemon says “no final answer” / suspicious truncation

2. **Silent successful truncation**
   - output is actually cut off
   - but the system still marks the turn as done

The second one is worse in a way, because it means:
- completion accounting says success
- but the delivered content is still incomplete

So yes, you’re right: not the same issue.


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 30.5s
Time: model 28.9s, overhead 1.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 214.4k o 191 t 120 est $0.5408; p≈2.5ktok/10.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 212.2k; active 212.2k; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 20.2%; usable 20.6%; observed turns 26; actual turns 55


Yeah, good catch — that’s a different failure mode.

What you’re describing is:

- the draft was already truncated
- the final was also truncated
- but the panel still marked the turn as **done**

So in that case the system did **not** reject the answer as suspicious. It believed the turn completed successfully, and the truncation happened **inside a supposedly successful path**.

So we likely have at least two separate bugs:

1. **Heuristic false failure**
   - output exists
   - daemon says “no final answer” / suspicious truncation

2. **Silent successful truncation**
   - output is actually cut off
   - but the system still marks the turn as done

The second one is worse in a way, because it means:
- completion accounting says success
- but the delivered content is still incomplete

So yes, you’re right: not the same issue.


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 30.9s
Time: model 28.9s, overhead 2.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 214.4k o 191 t 120 est $0.5408; p≈2.5ktok/10.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 214.7k; active 214.7k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 20.2%; usable 20.6%; observed turns 26; actual turns 55


Can we fix it from here?


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 214.7k; active 214.7k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 20.2%; usable 20.6%; observed turns 26; actual turns 55


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 214.7k; active 214.7k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 20.2%; usable 20.6%; observed turns 26; actual turns 55


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.6s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 214.7k; active 214.7k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 20.2%; usable 20.6%; observed turns 26; actual turns 55


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.1s
Time: overhead 1.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.3kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 214.7k; active 214.7k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 20.2%; usable 20.6%; observed turns 26; actual turns 55


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP load session start (1.3s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 214.7k; active 214.7k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 20.2%; usable 20.6%; observed turns 26; actual turns 55
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP replay drain done (4.4s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 214.7k; active 214.7k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 20.2%; usable 20.6%; observed turns 26; actual turns 56
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Waiting for first model/tool update…


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP prompt started (4.4s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 214.7k; active 214.7k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 20.2%; usable 20.6%; observed turns 26; actual turns 56
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 6.4s
Time: model 5.0s, overhead 1.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.3kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 214.7k; active 214.7k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 20.2%; usable 20.6%; observed turns 26; actual turns 56


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 12.1s
Time: model 10.7s, overhead 1.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.3kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 214.7k; active 214.7k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 20.2%; usable 20.6%; observed turns 26; actual turns 56


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first session update (8.2s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 214.7k; active 214.7k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 20.2%; usable 20.6%; observed turns 26; actual turns 56
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first visible text (9.5s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 214.7k; active 214.7k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 20.2%; usable 20.6%; observed turns 26; actual turns 56
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 214.7k; active 214.7k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 20.2%; usable 20.6%; observed turns 26; actual turns 56
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Yes


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 17.6s
Time: model 16.1s, overhead 1.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.3kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 214.7k; active 214.7k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 20.2%; usable 20.6%; observed turns 26; actual turns 56


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Yes, probably.

The **heuristic false-failure** part we can almost certainly fix from here in the repo:
- relax the truncation heuristic
- separate “partial output” from “no final answer”
- change the user-facing message

The **silent successful truncation** part is also fixable from here


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 23.3s
Time: model 21.9s, overhead 1.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.3kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 214.7k; active 214.7k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 20.2%; usable 20.6%; observed turns 26; actual turns 56


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Yes, probably.

The **heuristic false-failure** part we can almost certainly fix from here in the repo:
- relax the truncation heuristic
- separate “partial output” from “no final answer”
- change the user-facing message

The **silent successful truncation** part is also fixable from here if it’s in the daemon/bridge path, but it may need a bit more investigation because that one could be:
- stream assembly
- final extraction
- status panel marking success too early
- or provider/client output getting cut before the daemon notices

So:
- **yes


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Yes, probably.

The **heuristic false-failure** part we can almost certainly fix from here in the repo:
- relax the truncation heuristic
- separate “partial output” from “no final answer”
- change the user-facing message

The **silent successful truncation** part is also fixable from here if it’s in the daemon/bridge path, but it may need a bit more investigation because that one could be:
- stream assembly
- final extraction
- status panel marking success too early
- or provider/client output getting cut before the daemon notices

So:
- **yes, we can work on it from here**
- **the first bug is straightforward**
- **the second bug is likely fixable too, but less certain until we inspect the path more closely**

If you want, I can start with the safe fix first:
1. stop treating suspicious truncation as “no final answer”
2.


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 29.4s
Time: model 27.9s, overhead 1.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.3kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 214.7k; active 214.7k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 20.2%; usable 20.6%; observed turns 26; actual turns 56


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
ly.

The **heuristic false-failure** part we can almost certainly fix from here in the repo:
- relax the truncation heuristic
- separate “partial output” from “no final answer”
- change the user-facing message

The **silent successful truncation** part is also fixable from here if it’s in the daemon/bridge path, but it may need a bit more investigation because that one could be:
- stream assembly
- final extraction
- status panel marking success too early
- or provider/client output getting cut before the daemon notices

So:
- **yes, we can work on it from here**
- **the first bug is straightforward**
- **the second bug is likely fixable too, but less certain until we inspect the path more closely**

If you want, I can start with the safe fix first:
1. stop treating suspicious truncation as “no final answer”
2. always show available output
3. add clearer labels for partial/suspect output


* 🟠 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 30.2s
Time: model 28.7s, overhead 1.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 216.9k o 210 t 77 est $0.5466; p≈2.6ktok/10.3kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 214.7k; active 214.7k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 20.2%; usable 20.6%; observed turns 26; actual turns 56


* 🔴 Failed
Stage: model/tool run failed
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 30.7s
Time: model 28.7s
Cause: direct ACP client produced a suspiciously truncated final message: possible_mid_sentence_cutoff
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 214.7k; active 214.7k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 20.2%; usable 20.6%; observed turns 26; actual turns 56


* 🔴 Failed
Stage: no final answer
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 31.2s
Time: model 28.7s
Cause: direct ACP client produced a suspiciously truncated final message: possible_mid_sentence_cutoff
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 214.7k; active 214.7k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 20.2%; usable 20.6%; observed turns 26; actual turns 56


⚠ Matrix-lite did not receive a final answer for this request. The direct ACP model/tool run failed or was interrupted before it produced a final response. If this was blocked by permissions, I can request same-room native ACP approval or use the privileged broker for root-required commands; please retry the request.


* 🔴 Failed
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 31.7s
Time: model 28.7s, overhead 2.9s
Cause: direct ACP client produced a suspiciously truncated final message: possible_mid_sentence_cutoff
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 216.9k o 210 t 77 est $0.5466; p≈2.6ktok/10.3kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 217.2k; active 217.2k; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 20.2%; usable 20.6%; observed turns 26; actual turns 56


It will be challenging as now I get an error message instead of your text. I see the draft but only the tail of it. Maybe we should print out the entire draft it turns into normal message anyway if all goes well


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 217.2k; active 217.2k; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 20.7%; usable 21.1%; observed turns 28; actual turns 56


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 217.2k; active 217.2k; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 20.7%; usable 21.1%; observed turns 28; actual turns 56


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.6s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 217.2k; active 217.2k; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 20.7%; usable 21.1%; observed turns 28; actual turns 56


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.0s
Time: overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 217.2k; active 217.2k; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 20.7%; usable 21.1%; observed turns 28; actual turns 56


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP load session start (1.3s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 217.2k; active 217.2k; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 20.7%; usable 21.1%; observed turns 28; actual turns 56
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP replay drain done (4.4s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 217.2k; active 217.2k; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 20.7%; usable 21.1%; observed turns 28; actual turns 57
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Waiting for first model/tool update…


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 6.5s
Time: model 5.1s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 217.2k; active 217.2k; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 20.7%; usable 21.1%; observed turns 28; actual turns 57


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP prompt started (4.4s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 217.2k; active 217.2k; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 20.7%; usable 21.1%; observed turns 28; actual turns 57
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 12.3s
Time: model 10.9s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 217.2k; active 217.2k; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 20.7%; usable 21.1%; observed turns 28; actual turns 57


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first session update (7.5s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 217.2k; active 217.2k; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 20.7%; usable 21.1%; observed turns 28; actual turns 57
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first visible text (7.5s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 217.2k; active 217.2k; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 20.7%; usable 21.1%; observed turns 28; actual turns 57
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 217.2k; active 217.2k; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 20.7%; usable 21.1%; observed turns 28; actual turns 57
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Yeah


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 17.8s
Time: model 16.3s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 217.2k; active 217.2k; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 20.7%; usable 21.1%; observed turns 28; actual turns 57


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Yeah, that might actually be the pragmatic move.

If the draft already exists and is user-visible, then the safest behavior may be:

- keep accumulating the **full draft buffer**
- if the turn succeeds, send the normal final reply as usual
- if the turn fails, emit the **full buffered


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Yeah, that might actually be the pragmatic move.

If the draft already exists and is user-visible, then the safest behavior may be:

- keep accumulating the **full draft buffer**
- if the turn succeeds, send the normal final reply as usual
- if the turn fails, emit the **full buffered draft** as the fallback message, clearly labeled as partial/unverified

That would be much better than:
- showing only the tail
- then replacing it with a generic error

So fallback could become something like:

- **status:** turn failed / finalization failed
- **draft seen so far


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 23.7s
Time: model 22.3s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 217.2k; active 217.2k; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 20.7%; usable 21.1%; observed turns 28; actual turns 57


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Yeah, that might actually be the pragmatic move.

If the draft already exists and is user-visible, then the safest behavior may be:

- keep accumulating the **full draft buffer**
- if the turn succeeds, send the normal final reply as usual
- if the turn fails, emit the **full buffered draft** as the fallback message, clearly labeled as partial/unverified

That would be much better than:
- showing only the tail
- then replacing it with a generic error

So fallback could become something like:

- **status:** turn failed / finalization failed
- **draft seen so far:** full buffered text
- **note:** may be incomplete

That would at least preserve maximum usable content.

It’s a bit ugly, but given the current failure mode, ugly and informative is much better than clean and lossy.


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 26.5s
Time: model 25.1s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 219.3k o 174 t 22 est $0.5513; p≈2.5ktok/10.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 217.2k; active 217.2k; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 20.7%; usable 21.1%; observed turns 28; actual turns 57


Yeah, that might actually be the pragmatic move.

If the draft already exists and is user-visible, then the safest behavior may be:

- keep accumulating the **full draft buffer**
- if the turn succeeds, send the normal final reply as usual
- if the turn fails, emit the **full buffered draft** as the fallback message, clearly labeled as partial/unverified

That would be much better than:
- showing only the tail
- then replacing it with a generic error

So fallback could become something like:

- **status:** turn failed / finalization failed
- **draft seen so far:** full buffered text
- **note:** may be incomplete

That would at least preserve maximum usable content.

It’s a bit ugly, but given the current failure mode, ugly and informative is much better than clean and lossy.


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 27.0s
Time: model 25.1s, overhead 1.9s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 219.3k o 174 t 22 est $0.5513; p≈2.5ktok/10.1kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 219.5k; active 219.5k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 20.7%; usable 21.1%; observed turns 28; actual turns 57


It's not replacing the draft with an error message, it's separate. Please check how this works currently


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 219.5k; active 219.5k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 20.7%; usable 21.1%; observed turns 28; actual turns 57


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 219.5k; active 219.5k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 20.7%; usable 21.1%; observed turns 28; actual turns 57


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.6s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 219.5k; active 219.5k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 20.7%; usable 21.1%; observed turns 28; actual turns 57


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.0s
Time: overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 219.5k; active 219.5k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 20.7%; usable 21.1%; observed turns 28; actual turns 57


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP load session start (1.3s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 219.5k; active 219.5k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 20.7%; usable 21.1%; observed turns 28; actual turns 57
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP replay drain done (4.3s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 219.5k; active 219.5k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 20.7%; usable 21.1%; observed turns 28; actual turns 58
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Waiting for first model/tool update…


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP prompt started (4.3s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 219.5k; active 219.5k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 20.7%; usable 21.1%; observed turns 28; actual turns 58
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 6.5s
Time: model 5.0s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 219.5k; active 219.5k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 20.7%; usable 21.1%; observed turns 28; actual turns 58


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first session update (5.8s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 219.5k; active 219.5k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 20.7%; usable 21.1%; observed turns 28; actual turns 58
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 12.2s
Time: model 10.7s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 219.5k; active 219.5k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 20.7%; usable 21.1%; observed turns 28; actual turns 58


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first tool update (7.6s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 219.5k; active 219.5k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 20.7%; usable 21.1%; observed turns 28; actual turns 58
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 219.5k; active 219.5k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 20.7%; usable 21.1%; observed turns 28; actual turns 58
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (1):
- todowrite / pending / call_kpfuTIj2oW11kDUvwEsQ7S1


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 17.5s
Time: model 16.1s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 219.5k; active 219.5k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 20.7%; usable 21.1%; observed turns 28; actual turns 58


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (4):
- todowrite / pending / call_kpfuTIj2oW11kDUvwEsQ7S1
- todowrite / in_progress / call_kpfuTIj2oW11kDUvwEsQ7S1
- 3 todos / completed / call_kpfuTIj2oW11kDUvwEsQ7S1
- grep / pending / call_BkJ5unqHJirKcPVOJBtCqsD


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 22.9s
Time: model 21.5s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 219.5k; active 219.5k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 20.7%; usable 21.1%; observed turns 28; actual turns 58


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (10):
- todowrite / pending / call_kpfuTIj2oW11kDUvwEsQ7S1
- todowrite / in_progress / call_kpfuTIj2oW11kDUvwEsQ7S1
- 3 todos / completed / call_kpfuTIj2oW11kDUvwEsQ7S1
- grep / pending / call_BkJ5unqHJirKcPVOJBtCqsD
- grep / in_progress / call_BkJ5unqHJirKcPVOJBtCqsD
- read / pending / call_ZVP4DdBzR0U64oxQHO0GonY
- update_direct_acp_progress_panel|direct_acp_progress_panel_text|direct_acp_strea / completed / call_BkJ5unqHJirKcPVOJBtCqsD
- read / in_progress / call_ZVP4DdBzR0U64oxQHO0GonY
- read / pending / call_b44fe06DWdBpH9N2qn96w3d
- ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / call_ZVP4DdBzR0U64oxQHO0GonY


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (13):
- todowrite / pending / call_kpfuTIj2oW11kDUvwEsQ7S1
- todowrite / in_progress / call_kpfuTIj2oW11kDUvwEsQ7S1
- 3 todos / completed / call_kpfuTIj2oW11kDUvwEsQ7S1
- grep / pending / call_BkJ5unqHJirKcPVOJBtCqsD
- grep / in_progress / call_BkJ5unqHJirKcPVOJBtCqsD
- read / pending / call_ZVP4DdBzR0U64oxQHO0GonY
- update_direct_acp_progress_panel|direct_acp_progress_panel_text|direct_acp_strea / completed / call_BkJ5unqHJirKcPVOJBtCqsD
- read / in_progress / call_ZVP4DdBzR0U64oxQHO0GonY
- read / pending / call_b44fe06DWdBpH9N2qn96w3d
- ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / call_ZVP4DdBzR0U64oxQHO0GonY
- read / in_progress / call_b44fe06DWdBpH9N2qn96w3d
- ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / call_b44fe06DWdBpH9N2qn96w3d
- read / pending / call_HCJCGLmioYz4P6eUWtN4voM


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 28.4s
Time: model 27.0s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 219.5k; active 219.5k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 20.7%; usable 21.1%; observed turns 28; actual turns 58


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (19):
- todowrite / pending / call_kpfuTIj2oW11kDUvwEsQ7S1
- todowrite / in_progress / call_kpfuTIj2oW11kDUvwEsQ7S1
- 3 todos / completed / call_kpfuTIj2oW11kDUvwEsQ7S1
- grep / pending / call_BkJ5unqHJirKcPVOJBtCqsD
- grep / in_progress / call_BkJ5unqHJirKcPVOJBtCqsD
- read / pending / call_ZVP4DdBzR0U64oxQHO0GonY
- update_direct_acp_progress_panel|direct_acp_progress_panel_text|direct_acp_strea / completed / call_BkJ5unqHJirKcPVOJBtCqsD
- read / in_progress / call_ZVP4DdBzR0U64oxQHO0GonY
- read / pending / call_b44fe06DWdBpH9N2qn96w3d
- ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / call_ZVP4DdBzR0U64oxQHO0GonY
- read / in_progress / call_b44fe06DWdBpH9N2qn96w3d
- ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / call_b44fe06DWdBpH9N2qn96w3d
- read / pending / call_HCJCGLmioYz4P6eUWtN4voM
- read / in_progress / call_HCJCGLmioYz4P6eUWtN4voM
- ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / call_HCJCGLmioYz4P6eUWtN4voM
- read / pending / call_4Ctx4EqMrQKH1LprtODJ9Gw
- read / in_progress / call_4Ctx4EqMrQKH1LprtODJ9Gw
- ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / call_4Ctx4EqMrQKH1LprtODJ9Gw
- todowrite / pending / call_5w4QqD61v5kAog9C8jqNl7y


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 34.1s
Time: model 32.7s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 219.5k; active 219.5k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 20.7%; usable 21.1%; observed turns 28; actual turns 58


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (20):
- todowrite / pending / call_kpfuTIj2oW11kDUvwEsQ7S1
- todowrite / in_progress / call_kpfuTIj2oW11kDUvwEsQ7S1
- 3 todos / completed / call_kpfuTIj2oW11kDUvwEsQ7S1
- grep / pending / call_BkJ5unqHJirKcPVOJBtCqsD
- grep / in_progress / call_BkJ5unqHJirKcPVOJBtCqsD
- read / pending / call_ZVP4DdBzR0U64oxQHO0GonY
- update_direct_acp_progress_panel|direct_acp_progress_panel_text|direct_acp_strea / completed / call_BkJ5unqHJirKcPVOJBtCqsD
- read / in_progress / call_ZVP4DdBzR0U64oxQHO0GonY
- read / pending / call_b44fe06DWdBpH9N2qn96w3d
- ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / call_ZVP4DdBzR0U64oxQHO0GonY
- read / in_progress / call_b44fe06DWdBpH9N2qn96w3d
- ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / call_b44fe06DWdBpH9N2qn96w3d
- read / pending / call_HCJCGLmioYz4P6eUWtN4voM
- read / in_progress / call_HCJCGLmioYz4P6eUWtN4voM
- ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / call_HCJCGLmioYz4P6eUWtN4voM
- read / pending / call_4Ctx4EqMrQKH1LprtODJ9Gw
- read / in_progress / call_4Ctx4EqMrQKH1LprtODJ9Gw
- ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / call_4Ctx4EqMrQKH1LprtODJ9Gw
- todowrite / pending / call_5w4QqD61v5kAog9C8jqNl7y
- todowrite / in_progress / call_5w4QqD61v5kAog9C8jqNl7y


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first visible text (31.9s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 219.5k; active 219.5k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 20.7%; usable 21.1%; observed turns 28; actual turns 58
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (21):
- todowrite / pending / call_kpfuTIj2oW11kDUvwEsQ7S1
- todowrite / in_progress / call_kpfuTIj2oW11kDUvwEsQ7S1
- 3 todos / completed / call_kpfuTIj2oW11kDUvwEsQ7S1
- grep / pending / call_BkJ5unqHJirKcPVOJBtCqsD
- grep / in_progress / call_BkJ5unqHJirKcPVOJBtCqsD
- read / pending / call_ZVP4DdBzR0U64oxQHO0GonY
- update_direct_acp_progress_panel|direct_acp_progress_panel_text|direct_acp_strea / completed / call_BkJ5unqHJirKcPVOJBtCqsD
- read / in_progress / call_ZVP4DdBzR0U64oxQHO0GonY
- read / pending / call_b44fe06DWdBpH9N2qn96w3d
- ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / call_ZVP4DdBzR0U64oxQHO0GonY
- read / in_progress / call_b44fe06DWdBpH9N2qn96w3d
- ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / call_b44fe06DWdBpH9N2qn96w3d
- read / pending / call_HCJCGLmioYz4P6eUWtN4voM
- read / in_progress / call_HCJCGLmioYz4P6eUWtN4voM
- ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / call_HCJCGLmioYz4P6eUWtN4voM
- read / pending / call_4Ctx4EqMrQKH1LprtODJ9Gw
- read / in_progress / call_4Ctx4EqMrQKH1LprtODJ9Gw
- ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / call_4Ctx4EqMrQKH1LprtODJ9Gw
- todowrite / pending / call_5w4QqD61v5kAog9C8jqNl7y
- todowrite / in_progress / call_5w4QqD61v5kAog9C8jqNl7y
- 0 todos / completed / call_5w4QqD61v5kAog9C8jqNl7y

Draft:
Yes


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 39.6s
Time: model 38.2s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 219.5k; active 219.5k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 20.7%; usable 21.1%; observed turns 28; actual turns 58


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (21):
- todowrite / pending / call_kpfuTIj2oW11kDUvwEsQ7S1
- todowrite / in_progress / call_kpfuTIj2oW11kDUvwEsQ7S1
- 3 todos / completed / call_kpfuTIj2oW11kDUvwEsQ7S1
- grep / pending / call_BkJ5unqHJirKcPVOJBtCqsD
- grep / in_progress / call_BkJ5unqHJirKcPVOJBtCqsD
- read / pending / call_ZVP4DdBzR0U64oxQHO0GonY
- update_direct_acp_progress_panel|direct_acp_progress_panel_text|direct_acp_strea / completed / call_BkJ5unqHJirKcPVOJBtCqsD
- read / in_progress / call_ZVP4DdBzR0U64oxQHO0GonY
- read / pending / call_b44fe06DWdBpH9N2qn96w3d
- ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / call_ZVP4DdBzR0U64oxQHO0GonY
- read / in_progress / call_b44fe06DWdBpH9N2qn96w3d
- ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / call_b44fe06DWdBpH9N2qn96w3d
- read / pending / call_HCJCGLmioYz4P6eUWtN4voM
- read / in_progress / call_HCJCGLmioYz4P6eUWtN4voM
- ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / call_HCJCGLmioYz4P6eUWtN4voM
- read / pending / call_4Ctx4EqMrQKH1LprtODJ9Gw
- read / in_progress / call_4Ctx4EqMrQKH1LprtODJ9Gw
- ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / call_4Ctx4EqMrQKH1LprtODJ9Gw
- todowrite / pending / call_5w4QqD61v5kAog9C8jqNl7y
- todowrite / in_progress / call_5w4QqD61v5kAog9C8jqNl7y
- 0 todos / completed / call_5w4QqD61v5kAog9C8jqNl7y

Draft:
Yes — I checked, and you’re right.

Current behavior is **separate**, not replacement:

- The draft/progress comes from the **direct ACP progress panel**
  - `update_direct_acp_progress_panel()` in `matrix_lite/daemon.py:6020`


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 45.6s
Time: model 44.2s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 219.5k; active 219.5k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 20.7%; usable 21.1%; observed turns 28; actual turns 58


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (21):
- todowrite / pending / call_kpfuTIj2oW11kDUvwEsQ7S1
- todowrite / in_progress / call_kpfuTIj2oW11kDUvwEsQ7S1
- 3 todos / completed / call_kpfuTIj2oW11kDUvwEsQ7S1
- grep / pending / call_BkJ5unqHJirKcPVOJBtCqsD
- grep / in_progress / call_BkJ5unqHJirKcPVOJBtCqsD
- read / pending / call_ZVP4DdBzR0U64oxQHO0GonY
- update_direct_acp_progress_panel|direct_acp_progress_panel_text|direct_acp_strea / completed / call_BkJ5unqHJirKcPVOJBtCqsD
- read / in_progress / call_ZVP4DdBzR0U64oxQHO0GonY
- read / pending / call_b44fe06DWdBpH9N2qn96w3d
- ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / call_ZVP4DdBzR0U64oxQHO0GonY
- read / in_progress / call_b44fe06DWdBpH9N2qn96w3d
- ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / call_b44fe06DWdBpH9N2qn96w3d
- read / pending / call_HCJCGLmioYz4P6eUWtN4voM
- read / in_progress / call_HCJCGLmioYz4P6eUWtN4voM
- ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / call_HCJCGLmioYz4P6eUWtN4voM
- read / pending / call_4Ctx4EqMrQKH1LprtODJ9Gw
- read / in_progress / call_4Ctx4EqMrQKH1LprtODJ9Gw
- ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / call_4Ctx4EqMrQKH1LprtODJ9Gw
- todowrite / pending / call_5w4QqD61v5kAog9C8jqNl7y
- todowrite / in_progress / call_5w4QqD61v5kAog9C8jqNl7y
- 0 todos / completed / call_5w4QqD61v5kAog9C8jqNl7y

Draft:
Yes — I checked, and you’re right.

Current behavior is **separate**, not replacement:

- The draft/progress comes from the **direct ACP progress panel**
  - `update_direct_acp_progress_panel()` in `matrix_lite/daemon.py:6020`
  - it sends/edits a **notice message** with:
    - “📝 Live progress”
    - streamed draft/tool progress
  - this is tracked via `direct_acp_progress_panel_event_id`

- The error message is a **separate normal reply**
  - in


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 219.5k; active 219.5k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 20.7%; usable 21.1%; observed turns 28; actual turns 58
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (21):
- todowrite / pending / call_kpfuTIj2oW11kDUvwEsQ7S1
- todowrite / in_progress / call_kpfuTIj2oW11kDUvwEsQ7S1
- 3 todos / completed / call_kpfuTIj2oW11kDUvwEsQ7S1
- grep / pending / call_BkJ5unqHJirKcPVOJBtCqsD
- grep / in_progress / call_BkJ5unqHJirKcPVOJBtCqsD
- read / pending / call_ZVP4DdBzR0U64oxQHO0GonY
- update_direct_acp_progress_panel|direct_acp_progress_panel_text|direct_acp_strea / completed / call_BkJ5unqHJirKcPVOJBtCqsD
- read / in_progress / call_ZVP4DdBzR0U64oxQHO0GonY
- read / pending / call_b44fe06DWdBpH9N2qn96w3d
- ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / call_ZVP4DdBzR0U64oxQHO0GonY
- read / in_progress / call_b44fe06DWdBpH9N2qn96w3d
- ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / call_b44fe06DWdBpH9N2qn96w3d
- read / pending / call_HCJCGLmioYz4P6eUWtN4voM
- read / in_progress / call_HCJCGLmioYz4P6eUWtN4voM
- ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / call_HCJCGLmioYz4P6eUWtN4voM
- read / pending / call_4Ctx4EqMrQKH1LprtODJ9Gw
- read / in_progress / call_4Ctx4EqMrQKH1LprtODJ9Gw
- ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / call_4Ctx4EqMrQKH1LprtODJ9Gw
- todowrite / pending / call_5w4QqD61v5kAog9C8jqNl7y
- todowrite / in_progress / call_5w4QqD61v5kAog9C8jqNl7y
- 0 todos / completed / call_5w4QqD61v5kAog9C8jqNl7y

Draft:
Yes — I checked, and you’re right.

Current behavior is **separate**, not replacement:

- The draft/progress comes from the **direct ACP progress panel**
  - `update_direct_acp_progress_panel()` in `matrix_lite/daemon.py:6020`
  - it sends/edits a **notice message** with:
    - “📝 Live progress”
    - streamed draft/tool progress
  - this is tracked via `direct_acp_progress_panel_event_id`

- The error message is a **separate normal reply**
  - in `run_phase3_text_turn()` at `matrix_lite/daemon.py:8148-8154`
  - if direct ACP is classified as failed, it sets `reply_text` to the generic
    “did not receive a final answer...” message
  - then later at `8184-8194


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 51.6s
Time: model 50.2s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 219.5k; active 219.5k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 20.7%; usable 21.1%; observed turns 28; actual turns 58


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (21):
- todowrite / pending / call_kpfuTIj2oW11kDUvwEsQ7S1
- todowrite / in_progress / call_kpfuTIj2oW11kDUvwEsQ7S1
- 3 todos / completed / call_kpfuTIj2oW11kDUvwEsQ7S1
- grep / pending / call_BkJ5unqHJirKcPVOJBtCqsD
- grep / in_progress / call_BkJ5unqHJirKcPVOJBtCqsD
- read / pending / call_ZVP4DdBzR0U64oxQHO0GonY
- update_direct_acp_progress_panel|direct_acp_progress_panel_text|direct_acp_strea / completed / call_BkJ5unqHJirKcPVOJBtCqsD
- read / in_progress / call_ZVP4DdBzR0U64oxQHO0GonY
- read / pending / call_b44fe06DWdBpH9N2qn96w3d
- ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / call_ZVP4DdBzR0U64oxQHO0GonY
- read / in_progress / call_b44fe06DWdBpH9N2qn96w3d
- ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / call_b44fe06DWdBpH9N2qn96w3d
- read / pending / call_HCJCGLmioYz4P6eUWtN4voM
- read / in_progress / call_HCJCGLmioYz4P6eUWtN4voM
- ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / call_HCJCGLmioYz4P6eUWtN4voM
- read / pending / call_4Ctx4EqMrQKH1LprtODJ9Gw
- read / in_progress / call_4Ctx4EqMrQKH1LprtODJ9Gw
- ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / call_4Ctx4EqMrQKH1LprtODJ9Gw
- todowrite / pending / call_5w4QqD61v5kAog9C8jqNl7y
- todowrite / in_progress / call_5w4QqD61v5kAog9C8jqNl7y
- 0 todos / completed / call_5w4QqD61v5kAog9C8jqNl7y

Draft:
and you’re right.

Current behavior is **separate**, not replacement:

- The draft/progress comes from the **direct ACP progress panel**
  - `update_direct_acp_progress_panel()` in `matrix_lite/daemon.py:6020`
  - it sends/edits a **notice message** with:
    - “📝 Live progress”
    - streamed draft/tool progress
  - this is tracked via `direct_acp_progress_panel_event_id`

- The error message is a **separate normal reply**
  - in `run_phase3_text_turn()` at `matrix_lite/daemon.py:8148-8154`
  - if direct ACP is classified as failed, it sets `reply_text` to the generic
    “did not receive a final answer...” message
  - then later at `8184-8194` it sends that as a normal Matrix reply with `send_matrix_text(...)`

So what you’re seeing is:
1. a progress/draft notice message
2. then a separate error reply message

Not:
- draft replaced by error

And the status panel is yet another separate


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 57.7s
Time: model 56.2s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 219.5k; active 219.5k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 20.7%; usable 21.1%; observed turns 28; actual turns 58


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (21):
- todowrite / pending / call_kpfuTIj2oW11kDUvwEsQ7S1
- todowrite / in_progress / call_kpfuTIj2oW11kDUvwEsQ7S1
- 3 todos / completed / call_kpfuTIj2oW11kDUvwEsQ7S1
- grep / pending / call_BkJ5unqHJirKcPVOJBtCqsD
- grep / in_progress / call_BkJ5unqHJirKcPVOJBtCqsD
- read / pending / call_ZVP4DdBzR0U64oxQHO0GonY
- update_direct_acp_progress_panel|direct_acp_progress_panel_text|direct_acp_strea / completed / call_BkJ5unqHJirKcPVOJBtCqsD
- read / in_progress / call_ZVP4DdBzR0U64oxQHO0GonY
- read / pending / call_b44fe06DWdBpH9N2qn96w3d
- ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / call_ZVP4DdBzR0U64oxQHO0GonY
- read / in_progress / call_b44fe06DWdBpH9N2qn96w3d
- ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / call_b44fe06DWdBpH9N2qn96w3d
- read / pending / call_HCJCGLmioYz4P6eUWtN4voM
- read / in_progress / call_HCJCGLmioYz4P6eUWtN4voM
- ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / call_HCJCGLmioYz4P6eUWtN4voM
- read / pending / call_4Ctx4EqMrQKH1LprtODJ9Gw
- read / in_progress / call_4Ctx4EqMrQKH1LprtODJ9Gw
- ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / call_4Ctx4EqMrQKH1LprtODJ9Gw
- todowrite / pending / call_5w4QqD61v5kAog9C8jqNl7y
- todowrite / in_progress / call_5w4QqD61v5kAog9C8jqNl7y
- 0 todos / completed / call_5w4QqD61v5kAog9C8jqNl7y

Draft:
ce message** with:
    - “📝 Live progress”
    - streamed draft/tool progress
  - this is tracked via `direct_acp_progress_panel_event_id`

- The error message is a **separate normal reply**
  - in `run_phase3_text_turn()` at `matrix_lite/daemon.py:8148-8154`
  - if direct ACP is classified as failed, it sets `reply_text` to the generic
    “did not receive a final answer...” message
  - then later at `8184-8194` it sends that as a normal Matrix reply with `send_matrix_text(...)`

So what you’re seeing is:
1. a progress/draft notice message
2. then a separate error reply message

Not:
- draft replaced by error

And the status panel is yet another separate thing:
- updated at `8199-8226`

So the current architecture is basically **three channels**:
- progress panel / draft notice
- final normal reply
- status panel

That actually helps explain the confusion: the daemon can show a readable


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (21):
- todowrite / pending / call_kpfuTIj2oW11kDUvwEsQ7S1
- todowrite / in_progress / call_kpfuTIj2oW11kDUvwEsQ7S1
- 3 todos / completed / call_kpfuTIj2oW11kDUvwEsQ7S1
- grep / pending / call_BkJ5unqHJirKcPVOJBtCqsD
- grep / in_progress / call_BkJ5unqHJirKcPVOJBtCqsD
- read / pending / call_ZVP4DdBzR0U64oxQHO0GonY
- update_direct_acp_progress_panel|direct_acp_progress_panel_text|direct_acp_strea / completed / call_BkJ5unqHJirKcPVOJBtCqsD
- read / in_progress / call_ZVP4DdBzR0U64oxQHO0GonY
- read / pending / call_b44fe06DWdBpH9N2qn96w3d
- ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / call_ZVP4DdBzR0U64oxQHO0GonY
- read / in_progress / call_b44fe06DWdBpH9N2qn96w3d
- ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / call_b44fe06DWdBpH9N2qn96w3d
- read / pending / call_HCJCGLmioYz4P6eUWtN4voM
- read / in_progress / call_HCJCGLmioYz4P6eUWtN4voM
- ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / call_HCJCGLmioYz4P6eUWtN4voM
- read / pending / call_4Ctx4EqMrQKH1LprtODJ9Gw
- read / in_progress / call_4Ctx4EqMrQKH1LprtODJ9Gw
- ../../app/matrix_lite/daemon.py / completed / call_4Ctx4EqMrQKH1LprtODJ9Gw
- todowrite / pending / call_5w4QqD61v5kAog9C8jqNl7y
- todowrite / in_progress / call_5w4QqD61v5kAog9C8jqNl7y
- 0 todos / completed / call_5w4QqD61v5kAog9C8jqNl7y

Draft:
gress_panel_event_id`

- The error message is a **separate normal reply**
  - in `run_phase3_text_turn()` at `matrix_lite/daemon.py:8148-8154`
  - if direct ACP is classified as failed, it sets `reply_text` to the generic
    “did not receive a final answer...” message
  - then later at `8184-8194` it sends that as a normal Matrix reply with `send_matrix_text(...)`

So what you’re seeing is:
1. a progress/draft notice message
2. then a separate error reply message

Not:
- draft replaced by error

And the status panel is yet another separate thing:
- updated at `8199-8226`

So the current architecture is basically **three channels**:
- progress panel / draft notice
- final normal reply
- status panel

That actually helps explain the confusion: the daemon can show a readable draft in one message stream, then still emit a generic failure in another, because they’re not the same object/path.


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 60.9s
Time: model 59.4s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 792 o 316 cache 226.8k/100% est $0.0067; p≈2.6ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 219.5k; active 219.5k; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 20.7%; usable 21.1%; observed turns 28; actual turns 58


Yes — I checked, and you’re right.

Current behavior is **separate**, not replacement:

- The draft/progress comes from the **direct ACP progress panel**
  - `update_direct_acp_progress_panel()` in `matrix_lite/daemon.py:6020`
  - it sends/edits a **notice message** with:
    - “📝 Live progress”
    - streamed draft/tool progress
  - this is tracked via `direct_acp_progress_panel_event_id`

- The error message is a **separate normal reply**
  - in `run_phase3_text_turn()` at `matrix_lite/daemon.py:8148-8154`
  - if direct ACP is classified as failed, it sets `reply_text` to the generic
    “did not receive a final answer...” message
  - then later at `8184-8194` it sends that as a normal Matrix reply with `send_matrix_text(...)`

So what you’re seeing is:
1. a progress/draft notice message
2. then a separate error reply message

Not:
- draft replaced by error

And the status panel is yet another separate thing:
- updated at `8199-8226`

So the current architecture is basically **three channels**:
- progress panel / draft notice
- final normal reply
- status panel

That actually helps explain the confusion: the daemon can show a readable draft in one message stream, then still emit a generic failure in another, because they’re not the same object/path.


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 61.4s
Time: model 59.4s, overhead 2.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 792 o 316 cache 226.8k/100% est $0.0067; p≈2.6ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 227.9k; active 1.1k; cache 226.8k/100%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 20.7%; usable 21.1%; observed turns 28; actual turns 58


But why were the messages truncated?


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 227.9k; active 1.1k; cache 226.8k/100%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 21.7%; usable 22.1%; observed turns 30; actual turns 58


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 227.9k; active 1.1k; cache 226.8k/100%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 21.7%; usable 22.1%; observed turns 30; actual turns 58


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.6s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 227.9k; active 1.1k; cache 226.8k/100%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 21.7%; usable 22.1%; observed turns 30; actual turns 58


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.1s
Time: overhead 1.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.7ktok/10.8kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 227.9k; active 1.1k; cache 226.8k/100%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 21.7%; usable 22.1%; observed turns 30; actual turns 58


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP load session start (1.3s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 227.9k; active 1.1k; cache 226.8k/100%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 21.7%; usable 22.1%; observed turns 30; actual turns 58
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP replay drain done (4.8s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 227.9k; active 1.1k; cache 226.8k/100%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 21.7%; usable 22.1%; observed turns 30; actual turns 59
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 6.5s
Time: model 5.0s, overhead 1.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.7ktok/10.8kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 227.9k; active 1.1k; cache 226.8k/100%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 21.7%; usable 22.1%; observed turns 30; actual turns 59


📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Waiting for first model/tool update…


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP prompt started (4.8s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 227.9k; active 1.1k; cache 226.8k/100%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 21.7%; usable 22.1%; observed turns 30; actual turns 59
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 12.2s
Time: model 10.7s, overhead 1.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.7ktok/10.8kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 227.9k; active 1.1k; cache 226.8k/100%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 21.7%; usable 22.1%; observed turns 30; actual turns 59


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first session update (5.9s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 227.9k; active 1.1k; cache 226.8k/100%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 21.7%; usable 22.1%; observed turns 30; actual turns 59
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first visible text (5.9s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 227.9k; active 1.1k; cache 226.8k/100%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 21.7%; usable 22.1%; observed turns 30; actual turns 59
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 227.9k; active 1.1k; cache 226.8k/100%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 21.7%; usable 22.1%; observed turns 30; actual turns 59
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Most


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Most likely because the **draft/progress path itself only keeps a shortened slice**, not the full text.

From what I checked:
- the progress panel stores only a suffix/summary of the streamed text
- it trims what it keeps
- so even before the final reply logic runs, the visible draft channel is already los


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 18.0s
Time: model 16.5s, overhead 1.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.7ktok/10.8kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 227.9k; active 1.1k; cache 226.8k/100%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 21.7%; usable 22.1%; observed turns 30; actual turns 59


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Most likely because the **draft/progress path itself only keeps a shortened slice**, not the full text.

From what I checked:
- the progress panel stores only a suffix/summary of the streamed text
- it trims what it keeps
- so even before the final reply logic runs, the visible draft channel is already lossy

So there are really two truncation points:

1. **Progress-panel truncation**
   - the live draft notice is intentionally shortened
   - that’s why you may only see the tail

2. **Final-reply truncation or misclassification**
   - separately, the


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 24.2s
Time: model 22.7s, overhead 1.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.7ktok/10.8kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 227.9k; active 1.1k; cache 226.8k/100%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 21.7%; usable 22.1%; observed turns 30; actual turns 59


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Most likely because the **draft/progress path itself only keeps a shortened slice**, not the full text.

From what I checked:
- the progress panel stores only a suffix/summary of the streamed text
- it trims what it keeps
- so even before the final reply logic runs, the visible draft channel is already lossy

So there are really two truncation points:

1. **Progress-panel truncation**
   - the live draft notice is intentionally shortened
   - that’s why you may only see the tail

2. **Final-reply truncation or misclassification**
   - separately, the final path can mark output as suspicious / failed
   - or a “successful” final can still end up incomplete

So when you saw truncated draft + truncated final, the draft truncation was probably not mysterious at all — it’s built into how the progress panel currently works


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Most likely because the **draft/progress path itself only keeps a shortened slice**, not the full text.

From what I checked:
- the progress panel stores only a suffix/summary of the streamed text
- it trims what it keeps
- so even before the final reply logic runs, the visible draft channel is already lossy

So there are really two truncation points:

1. **Progress-panel truncation**
   - the live draft notice is intentionally shortened
   - that’s why you may only see the tail

2. **Final-reply truncation or misclassification**
   - separately, the final path can mark output as suspicious / failed
   - or a “successful” final can still end up incomplete

So when you saw truncated draft + truncated final, the draft truncation was probably not mysterious at all — it’s built into how the progress panel currently works. The final truncation is the more serious bug.


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 27.1s
Time: model 25.6s, overhead 1.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 223.6k o 193 cache 6.7k/3% est $0.5618; p≈2.7ktok/10.8kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 227.9k; active 1.1k; cache 226.8k/100%; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 21.7%; usable 22.1%; observed turns 30; actual turns 59


Most likely because the **draft/progress path itself only keeps a shortened slice**, not the full text.

From what I checked:
- the progress panel stores only a suffix/summary of the streamed text
- it trims what it keeps
- so even before the final reply logic runs, the visible draft channel is already lossy

So there are really two truncation points:

1. **Progress-panel truncation**
   - the live draft notice is intentionally shortened
   - that’s why you may only see the tail

2. **Final-reply truncation or misclassification**
   - separately, the final path can mark output as suspicious / failed
   - or a “successful” final can still end up incomplete

So when you saw truncated draft + truncated final, the draft truncation was probably not mysterious at all — it’s built into how the progress panel currently works. The final truncation is the more serious bug.


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 27.7s
Time: model 25.6s, overhead 2.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 223.6k o 193 cache 6.7k/3% est $0.5618; p≈2.7ktok/10.8kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 230.4k; active 223.8k; cache 6.7k/3%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 21.7%; usable 22.1%; observed turns 30; actual turns 59


How do we fix this?


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 230.4k; active 223.8k; cache 6.7k/3%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 21.9%; usable 22.4%; observed turns 31; actual turns 59


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 230.4k; active 223.8k; cache 6.7k/3%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 21.9%; usable 22.4%; observed turns 31; actual turns 59


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.6s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 230.4k; active 223.8k; cache 6.7k/3%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 21.9%; usable 22.4%; observed turns 31; actual turns 59


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.0s
Time: overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.4kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 230.4k; active 223.8k; cache 6.7k/3%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 21.9%; usable 22.4%; observed turns 31; actual turns 59


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP load session start (1.2s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 230.4k; active 223.8k; cache 6.7k/3%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 21.9%; usable 22.4%; observed turns 31; actual turns 59
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP replay drain done (4.2s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 230.4k; active 223.8k; cache 6.7k/3%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 21.9%; usable 22.4%; observed turns 31; actual turns 60
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Waiting for first model/tool update…


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP prompt started (4.2s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 230.4k; active 223.8k; cache 6.7k/3%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 21.9%; usable 22.4%; observed turns 31; actual turns 60
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 6.4s
Time: model 5.0s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.4kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 230.4k; active 223.8k; cache 6.7k/3%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 21.9%; usable 22.4%; observed turns 31; actual turns 60


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 11.8s
Time: model 10.4s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.4kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 230.4k; active 223.8k; cache 6.7k/3%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 21.9%; usable 22.4%; observed turns 31; actual turns 60


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 17.3s
Time: model 15.9s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.4kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 230.4k; active 223.8k; cache 6.7k/3%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 21.9%; usable 22.4%; observed turns 31; actual turns 60


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first session update (13.3s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 230.4k; active 223.8k; cache 6.7k/3%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 21.9%; usable 22.4%; observed turns 31; actual turns 60
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first visible text (14.2s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 230.4k; active 223.8k; cache 6.7k/3%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 21.9%; usable 22.4%; observed turns 31; actual turns 60
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 230.4k; active 223.8k; cache 6.7k/3%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 21.9%; usable 22.4%; observed turns 31; actual turns 60
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Two


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 22.7s
Time: model 21.3s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.4kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 230.4k; active 223.8k; cache 6.7k/3%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 21.9%; usable 22.4%; observed turns 31; actual turns 60


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Two fixes, one simple and one deeper.

**1. Fix the progress panel**
- stop storing only a short tail
- keep a larger rolling buffer, or the full draft for the current turn
- if needed, trim only for display, not for internal state

So:
- **buffer full draft**
-


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 28.7s
Time: model 27.3s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.4kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 230.4k; active 223.8k; cache 6.7k/3%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 21.9%; usable 22.4%; observed turns 31; actual turns 60


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Two fixes, one simple and one deeper.

**1. Fix the progress panel**
- stop storing only a short tail
- keep a larger rolling buffer, or the full draft for the current turn
- if needed, trim only for display, not for internal state

So:
- **buffer full draft**
- **display shortened view**
- **fallback can use full buffered draft**

**2. Fix the final reply path**
- don’t treat suspicious truncation as “no answer”
- if final text exists, send it
- attach a warning if it looks incomplete
- only use the generic failure message when there is truly no


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Two fixes, one simple and one deeper.

**1. Fix the progress panel**
- stop storing only a short tail
- keep a larger rolling buffer, or the full draft for the current turn
- if needed, trim only for display, not for internal state

So:
- **buffer full draft**
- **display shortened view**
- **fallback can use full buffered draft**

**2. Fix the final reply path**
- don’t treat suspicious truncation as “no answer”
- if final text exists, send it
- attach a warning if it looks incomplete
- only use the generic failure message when there is truly no usable text

So the new logic should be:

- **draft channel**
  - keep full buffer
  - show compact preview

- **final channel**
  - if final text exists:
    - send it
    - maybe label it “possibly truncated”
  - if no final


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 34.2s
Time: model 32.8s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.4kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 230.4k; active 223.8k; cache 6.7k/3%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 21.9%; usable 22.4%; observed turns 31; actual turns 60


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
 turn
- if needed, trim only for display, not for internal state

So:
- **buffer full draft**
- **display shortened view**
- **fallback can use full buffered draft**

**2. Fix the final reply path**
- don’t treat suspicious truncation as “no answer”
- if final text exists, send it
- attach a warning if it looks incomplete
- only use the generic failure message when there is truly no usable text

So the new logic should be:

- **draft channel**
  - keep full buffer
  - show compact preview

- **final channel**
  - if final text exists:
    - send it
    - maybe label it “possibly truncated”
  - if no final text exists:
    - send failure message
    - optionally include buffered draft

- **status panel**
  - distinguish:
    - done
    - done but suspiciously truncated
    - failed before final answer

That would fix both problems:
- no more tail-only draft
- no more readable output being


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 39.9s
Time: model 38.4s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.4kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 230.4k; active 223.8k; cache 6.7k/3%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 21.9%; usable 22.4%; observed turns 31; actual turns 60


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
inal text exists, send it
- attach a warning if it looks incomplete
- only use the generic failure message when there is truly no usable text

So the new logic should be:

- **draft channel**
  - keep full buffer
  - show compact preview

- **final channel**
  - if final text exists:
    - send it
    - maybe label it “possibly truncated”
  - if no final text exists:
    - send failure message
    - optionally include buffered draft

- **status panel**
  - distinguish:
    - done
    - done but suspiciously truncated
    - failed before final answer

That would fix both problems:
- no more tail-only draft
- no more readable output being thrown away as “no final answer”

So the concrete implementation order I’d use is:
1. keep full draft buffer in daemon state
2. show final text even when truncation heuristic fires
3. downgrade `possible_mid_sentence_cutoff` from hard failure to warning
4


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
ic failure message when there is truly no usable text

So the new logic should be:

- **draft channel**
  - keep full buffer
  - show compact preview

- **final channel**
  - if final text exists:
    - send it
    - maybe label it “possibly truncated”
  - if no final text exists:
    - send failure message
    - optionally include buffered draft

- **status panel**
  - distinguish:
    - done
    - done but suspiciously truncated
    - failed before final answer

That would fix both problems:
- no more tail-only draft
- no more readable output being thrown away as “no final answer”

So the concrete implementation order I’d use is:
1. keep full draft buffer in daemon state
2. show final text even when truncation heuristic fires
3. downgrade `possible_mid_sentence_cutoff` from hard failure to warning
4. add a separate status like **done (partial?)** instead of plain **done** or **failed**


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 42.9s
Time: model 41.5s, overhead 1.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 232.7k o 335 t 31 est $0.5873; p≈2.6ktok/10.4kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 230.4k; active 223.8k; cache 6.7k/3%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 21.9%; usable 22.4%; observed turns 31; actual turns 60


Two fixes, one simple and one deeper.

**1. Fix the progress panel**
- stop storing only a short tail
- keep a larger rolling buffer, or the full draft for the current turn
- if needed, trim only for display, not for internal state

So:
- **buffer full draft**
- **display shortened view**
- **fallback can use full buffered draft**

**2. Fix the final reply path**
- don’t treat suspicious truncation as “no answer”
- if final text exists, send it
- attach a warning if it looks incomplete
- only use the generic failure message when there is truly no usable text

So the new logic should be:

- **draft channel**
  - keep full buffer
  - show compact preview

- **final channel**
  - if final text exists:
    - send it
    - maybe label it “possibly truncated”
  - if no final text exists:
    - send failure message
    - optionally include buffered draft

- **status panel**
  - distinguish:
    - done
    - done but suspiciously truncated
    - failed before final answer

That would fix both problems:
- no more tail-only draft
- no more readable output being thrown away as “no final answer”

So the concrete implementation order I’d use is:
1. keep full draft buffer in daemon state
2. show final text even when truncation heuristic fires
3. downgrade `possible_mid_sentence_cutoff` from hard failure to warning
4. add a separate status like **done (partial?)** instead of plain **done** or **failed**


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 43.4s
Time: model 41.5s, overhead 1.9s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 232.7k o 335 t 31 est $0.5873; p≈2.6ktok/10.4kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 233.1k; active 233.1k; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 21.9%; usable 22.4%; observed turns 31; actual turns 60


Can you do it from here?


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 233.1k; active 233.1k; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 21.9%; usable 22.4%; observed turns 31; actual turns 60


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 233.1k; active 233.1k; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 21.9%; usable 22.4%; observed turns 31; actual turns 60


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.7s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 233.1k; active 233.1k; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 21.9%; usable 22.4%; observed turns 31; actual turns 60


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.1s
Time: overhead 1.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.8ktok/11.3kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 233.1k; active 233.1k; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 21.9%; usable 22.4%; observed turns 31; actual turns 60


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP load session start (1.2s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 233.1k; active 233.1k; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 21.9%; usable 22.4%; observed turns 31; actual turns 60
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP replay drain done (4.2s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 233.1k; active 233.1k; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 21.9%; usable 22.4%; observed turns 31; actual turns 61
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Waiting for first model/tool update…


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP prompt started (4.2s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 233.1k; active 233.1k; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 21.9%; usable 22.4%; observed turns 31; actual turns 61
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 6.5s
Time: model 5.0s, overhead 1.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.8ktok/11.3kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 233.1k; active 233.1k; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 21.9%; usable 22.4%; observed turns 31; actual turns 61


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first session update (5.5s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 233.1k; active 233.1k; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 21.9%; usable 22.4%; observed turns 31; actual turns 61
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 12.1s
Time: model 10.5s, overhead 1.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.8ktok/11.3kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 233.1k; active 233.1k; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 21.9%; usable 22.4%; observed turns 31; actual turns 61


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first visible text (6.6s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 233.1k; active 233.1k; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 21.9%; usable 22.4%; observed turns 31; actual turns 61
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 233.1k; active 233.1k; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 21.9%; usable 22.4%; observed turns 31; actual turns 61
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Yes


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Yes, probably.

At least the daemon-side parts:
- keep a fuller draft buffer
- stop using tail-only progress state
- separate “partial output” from “no final answer”
- improve status labeling

Those should be fixable from here in the repo.

The only part that might turn out less local is if some truncation happens


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 17.7s
Time: model 16.2s, overhead 1.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.8ktok/11.3kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 233.1k; active 233.1k; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 21.9%; usable 22.4%; observed turns 31; actual turns 61


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Yes, probably.

At least the daemon-side parts:
- keep a fuller draft buffer
- stop using tail-only progress state
- separate “partial output” from “no final answer”
- improve status labeling

Those should be fixable from here in the repo.

The only part that might turn out less local is if some truncation happens upstream in the provider/client before the daemon ever sees the full text. But the current behavior is bad enough on the daemon side that there’s still plenty we can improve here.

If you want, I can start patching the safer parts first.


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 20.9s
Time: model 19.3s, overhead 1.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 228.9k o 124 t 52 cache 6.7k/3% est $0.5749; p≈2.8ktok/11.3kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 233.1k; active 233.1k; p≈2.6ktok; ctx 21.9%; usable 22.4%; observed turns 31; actual turns 61


Yes, probably.

At least the daemon-side parts:
- keep a fuller draft buffer
- stop using tail-only progress state
- separate “partial output” from “no final answer”
- improve status labeling

Those should be fixable from here in the repo.

The only part that might turn out less local is if some truncation happens upstream in the provider/client before the daemon ever sees the full text. But the current behavior is bad enough on the daemon side that there’s still plenty we can improve here.

If you want, I can start patching the safer parts first.


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 21.3s
Time: model 19.3s, overhead 2.0s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 228.9k o 124 t 52 cache 6.7k/3% est $0.5749; p≈2.8ktok/11.3kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 235.8k; active 229.1k; cache 6.7k/3%; p≈2.8ktok; ctx 21.9%; usable 22.4%; observed turns 31; actual turns 61


Not yet, we are doing a review of the whole dirty diff and some things might change


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 235.8k; active 229.1k; cache 6.7k/3%; p≈2.8ktok; ctx 22.5%; usable 22.9%; observed turns 33; actual turns 61


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 235.8k; active 229.1k; cache 6.7k/3%; p≈2.8ktok; ctx 22.5%; usable 22.9%; observed turns 33; actual turns 61


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.6s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 235.8k; active 229.1k; cache 6.7k/3%; p≈2.8ktok; ctx 22.5%; usable 22.9%; observed turns 33; actual turns 61


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.2s
Time: overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.1ktok/12.3kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 235.8k; active 229.1k; cache 6.7k/3%; p≈2.8ktok; ctx 22.5%; usable 22.9%; observed turns 33; actual turns 61


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP load session start (1.2s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 235.8k; active 229.1k; cache 6.7k/3%; p≈2.8ktok; ctx 22.5%; usable 22.9%; observed turns 33; actual turns 61
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP replay drain done (4.2s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 235.8k; active 229.1k; cache 6.7k/3%; p≈2.8ktok; ctx 22.5%; usable 22.9%; observed turns 33; actual turns 62
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Waiting for first model/tool update…


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP prompt started (4.2s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 235.8k; active 229.1k; cache 6.7k/3%; p≈2.8ktok; ctx 22.5%; usable 22.9%; observed turns 33; actual turns 62
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 6.6s
Time: model 5.0s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.1ktok/12.3kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 235.8k; active 229.1k; cache 6.7k/3%; p≈2.8ktok; ctx 22.5%; usable 22.9%; observed turns 33; actual turns 62


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first session update (6.1s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 235.8k; active 229.1k; cache 6.7k/3%; p≈2.8ktok; ctx 22.5%; usable 22.9%; observed turns 33; actual turns 62
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 12.1s
Time: model 10.5s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈3.1ktok/12.3kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 235.8k; active 229.1k; cache 6.7k/3%; p≈2.8ktok; ctx 22.5%; usable 22.9%; observed turns 33; actual turns 62


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first visible text (6.1s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 235.8k; active 229.1k; cache 6.7k/3%; p≈2.8ktok; ctx 22.5%; usable 22.9%; observed turns 33; actual turns 62
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 235.8k; active 229.1k; cache 6.7k/3%; p≈2.8ktok; ctx 22.5%; usable 22.9%; observed turns 33; actual turns 62
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Makes


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Makes sense — better to review the whole dirty state first than patch on top of shifting ground.


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 15.1s
Time: model 13.6s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 238.4k o 23 est $0.5965; p≈3.1ktok/12.3kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 235.8k; active 229.1k; cache 6.7k/3%; p≈2.8ktok; ctx 22.5%; usable 22.9%; observed turns 33; actual turns 62


Makes sense — better to review the whole dirty state first than patch on top of shifting ground.


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 15.7s
Time: model 13.6s, overhead 2.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 238.4k o 23 est $0.5965; p≈3.1ktok/12.3kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 238.5k; active 238.5k; p≈3.1ktok; ctx 22.5%; usable 22.9%; observed turns 33; actual turns 62


Do you still have access to playwright and search mcps?


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 238.5k; active 238.5k; p≈3.1ktok; ctx 22.7%; usable 25.9%; observed turns 34; actual turns 62


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 238.5k; active 238.5k; p≈3.1ktok; ctx 22.7%; usable 25.9%; observed turns 34; actual turns 62


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.7s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 238.5k; active 238.5k; p≈3.1ktok; ctx 22.7%; usable 25.9%; observed turns 34; actual turns 62


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.2s
Time: overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.7ktok/10.9kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 238.5k; active 238.5k; p≈3.1ktok; ctx 22.7%; usable 25.9%; observed turns 34; actual turns 62


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP load session start (1.3s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 238.5k; active 238.5k; p≈3.1ktok; ctx 22.7%; usable 25.9%; observed turns 34; actual turns 62
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP replay drain done (4.5s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 238.5k; active 238.5k; p≈3.1ktok; ctx 22.7%; usable 25.9%; observed turns 34; actual turns 63
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Waiting for first model/tool update…


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 6.6s
Time: model 5.0s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.7ktok/10.9kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 238.5k; active 238.5k; p≈3.1ktok; ctx 22.7%; usable 25.9%; observed turns 34; actual turns 63


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP prompt started (4.5s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 238.5k; active 238.5k; p≈3.1ktok; ctx 22.7%; usable 25.9%; observed turns 34; actual turns 63
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 12.5s
Time: model 10.9s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.7ktok/10.9kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 238.5k; active 238.5k; p≈3.1ktok; ctx 22.7%; usable 25.9%; observed turns 34; actual turns 63


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first session update (7.4s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 238.5k; active 238.5k; p≈3.1ktok; ctx 22.7%; usable 25.9%; observed turns 34; actual turns 63
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first tool update (11.0s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 238.5k; active 238.5k; p≈3.1ktok; ctx 22.7%; usable 25.9%; observed turns 34; actual turns 63
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 238.5k; active 238.5k; p≈3.1ktok; ctx 22.7%; usable 25.9%; observed turns 34; actual turns 63
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (1):
- grep / pending / call_llOdhIxFiCmPmEFuiYGG1O5


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 18.0s
Time: model 16.4s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.7ktok/10.9kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 238.5k; active 238.5k; p≈3.1ktok; ctx 22.7%; usable 25.9%; observed turns 34; actual turns 63


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (7):
- grep / pending / call_llOdhIxFiCmPmEFuiYGG1O5
- grep / in_progress / call_llOdhIxFiCmPmEFuiYGG1O5
- read / pending / call_LhShGmmw1wVL5INMZPllEeN
- playwright|duckduckgo|searxng|brave-search|exa / completed / call_llOdhIxFiCmPmEFuiYGG1O5
- read / in_progress / call_LhShGmmw1wVL5INMZPllEeN
- matrix_lite_status_capability_report / pending / call_1fdrkSD2yrSRrdIaAYb2rB4
- ../../xdg/persistent-chat/opencode/opencode.json / completed / call_LhShGmmw1wVL5INMZPllEeN


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first visible text (16.4s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 238.5k; active 238.5k; p≈3.1ktok; ctx 22.7%; usable 25.9%; observed turns 34; actual turns 63
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (9):
- grep / pending / call_llOdhIxFiCmPmEFuiYGG1O5
- grep / in_progress / call_llOdhIxFiCmPmEFuiYGG1O5
- read / pending / call_LhShGmmw1wVL5INMZPllEeN
- playwright|duckduckgo|searxng|brave-search|exa / completed / call_llOdhIxFiCmPmEFuiYGG1O5
- read / in_progress / call_LhShGmmw1wVL5INMZPllEeN
- matrix_lite_status_capability_report / pending / call_1fdrkSD2yrSRrdIaAYb2rB4
- ../../xdg/persistent-chat/opencode/opencode.json / completed / call_LhShGmmw1wVL5INMZPllEeN
- matrix_lite_status_capability_report / in_progress / call_1fdrkSD2yrSRrdIaAYb2rB4
- tool / completed / call_1fdrkSD2yrSRrdIaAYb2rB4

Draft:
Not


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 23.7s
Time: model 22.1s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.7ktok/10.9kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 238.5k; active 238.5k; p≈3.1ktok; ctx 22.7%; usable 25.9%; observed turns 34; actual turns 63


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (9):
- grep / pending / call_llOdhIxFiCmPmEFuiYGG1O5
- grep / in_progress / call_llOdhIxFiCmPmEFuiYGG1O5
- read / pending / call_LhShGmmw1wVL5INMZPllEeN
- playwright|duckduckgo|searxng|brave-search|exa / completed / call_llOdhIxFiCmPmEFuiYGG1O5
- read / in_progress / call_LhShGmmw1wVL5INMZPllEeN
- matrix_lite_status_capability_report / pending / call_1fdrkSD2yrSRrdIaAYb2rB4
- ../../xdg/persistent-chat/opencode/opencode.json / completed / call_LhShGmmw1wVL5INMZPllEeN
- matrix_lite_status_capability_report / in_progress / call_1fdrkSD2yrSRrdIaAYb2rB4
- tool / completed / call_1fdrkSD2yrSRrdIaAYb2rB4

Draft:
Not currently in this session’s OpenCode MCP config.

I checked `/home/matrix-lite/xdg/persistent-chat/opencode/opencode.json` and:
- `playwright`: `enabled: false`
- `duckduckgo`: `enabled: false`
- `se


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 30.1s
Time: model 28.5s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.7ktok/10.9kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 238.5k; active 238.5k; p≈3.1ktok; ctx 22.7%; usable 25.9%; observed turns 34; actual turns 63


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (9):
- grep / pending / call_llOdhIxFiCmPmEFuiYGG1O5
- grep / in_progress / call_llOdhIxFiCmPmEFuiYGG1O5
- read / pending / call_LhShGmmw1wVL5INMZPllEeN
- playwright|duckduckgo|searxng|brave-search|exa / completed / call_llOdhIxFiCmPmEFuiYGG1O5
- read / in_progress / call_LhShGmmw1wVL5INMZPllEeN
- matrix_lite_status_capability_report / pending / call_1fdrkSD2yrSRrdIaAYb2rB4
- ../../xdg/persistent-chat/opencode/opencode.json / completed / call_LhShGmmw1wVL5INMZPllEeN
- matrix_lite_status_capability_report / in_progress / call_1fdrkSD2yrSRrdIaAYb2rB4
- tool / completed / call_1fdrkSD2yrSRrdIaAYb2rB4

Draft:
Not currently in this session’s OpenCode MCP config.

I checked `/home/matrix-lite/xdg/persistent-chat/opencode/opencode.json` and:
- `playwright`: `enabled: false`
- `duckduckgo`: `enabled: false`
- `searxng`: `enabled: false`
- `brave-search`: `enabled: false`

So:
- **Playwright MCP:** disabled
- **search MCPs:** disabled

I still have other search tools available here in chat, but the specific **persistent-chat


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (9):
- grep / pending / call_llOdhIxFiCmPmEFuiYGG1O5
- grep / in_progress / call_llOdhIxFiCmPmEFuiYGG1O5
- read / pending / call_LhShGmmw1wVL5INMZPllEeN
- playwright|duckduckgo|searxng|brave-search|exa / completed / call_llOdhIxFiCmPmEFuiYGG1O5
- read / in_progress / call_LhShGmmw1wVL5INMZPllEeN
- matrix_lite_status_capability_report / pending / call_1fdrkSD2yrSRrdIaAYb2rB4
- ../../xdg/persistent-chat/opencode/opencode.json / completed / call_LhShGmmw1wVL5INMZPllEeN
- matrix_lite_status_capability_report / in_progress / call_1fdrkSD2yrSRrdIaAYb2rB4
- tool / completed / call_1fdrkSD2yrSRrdIaAYb2rB4

Draft:
Not currently in this session’s OpenCode MCP config.

I checked `/home/matrix-lite/xdg/persistent-chat/opencode/opencode.json` and:
- `playwright`: `enabled: false`
- `duckduckgo`: `enabled: false`
- `searxng`: `enabled: false`
- `brave-search`: `enabled: false`

So:
- **Playwright MCP:** disabled
- **search MCPs:** disabled

I still have other search tools available here in chat, but the specific **persistent-chat MCP entries** for Playwright/search are off right now.


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 32.9s
Time: model 31.3s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 5.6k o 129 t 43 cache 240.6k/98% est $0.0166; p≈2.7ktok/10.9kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 238.5k; active 238.5k; p≈3.1ktok; ctx 22.7%; usable 25.9%; observed turns 34; actual turns 63


Not currently in this session’s OpenCode MCP config.

I checked `/home/matrix-lite/xdg/persistent-chat/opencode/opencode.json` and:
- `playwright`: `enabled: false`
- `duckduckgo`: `enabled: false`
- `searxng`: `enabled: false`
- `brave-search`: `enabled: false`

So:
- **Playwright MCP:** disabled
- **search MCPs:** disabled

I still have other search tools available here in chat, but the specific **persistent-chat MCP entries** for Playwright/search are off right now.


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 33.5s
Time: model 31.3s, overhead 2.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: i 5.6k o 129 t 43 cache 240.6k/98% est $0.0166; p≈2.7ktok/10.9kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 246.4k; active 5.8k; cache 240.6k/98%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 22.7%; usable 25.9%; observed turns 34; actual turns 63


But you have mcp proxy


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 246.4k; active 5.8k; cache 240.6k/98%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 22.7%; usable 25.9%; observed turns 34; actual turns 63


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.1s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 246.4k; active 5.8k; cache 240.6k/98%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 22.7%; usable 25.9%; observed turns 34; actual turns 63


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.8s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Ctx: direct ACP session 246.4k; active 5.8k; cache 240.6k/98%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 22.7%; usable 25.9%; observed turns 34; actual turns 63


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.2s
Time: overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 246.4k; active 5.8k; cache 240.6k/98%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 22.7%; usable 25.9%; observed turns 34; actual turns 63


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP load session start (1.3s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 246.4k; active 5.8k; cache 240.6k/98%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 22.7%; usable 25.9%; observed turns 34; actual turns 63
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP replay drain done (4.7s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 246.4k; active 5.8k; cache 240.6k/98%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 22.7%; usable 25.9%; observed turns 34; actual turns 64
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 6.7s
Time: model 5.0s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 246.4k; active 5.8k; cache 240.6k/98%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 22.7%; usable 25.9%; observed turns 34; actual turns 64


📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Waiting for first model/tool update…


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP prompt started (4.7s)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 246.4k; active 5.8k; cache 240.6k/98%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 22.7%; usable 25.9%; observed turns 34; actual turns 64
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 12.6s
Time: model 10.9s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 246.4k; active 5.8k; cache 240.6k/98%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 22.7%; usable 25.9%; observed turns 34; actual turns 64


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first session update (10.8s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 246.4k; active 5.8k; cache 240.6k/98%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 22.7%; usable 25.9%; observed turns 34; actual turns 64
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 18.0s
Time: model 16.3s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 246.4k; active 5.8k; cache 240.6k/98%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 22.7%; usable 25.9%; observed turns 34; actual turns 64


* 🟡 Working
Stage: direct ACP first visible text (12.0s after prompt)
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 246.4k; active 5.8k; cache 240.6k/98%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 22.7%; usable 25.9%; observed turns 34; actual turns 64
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 🟡 Working
Stage: streaming direct ACP progress
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Ctx: direct ACP session 246.4k; active 5.8k; cache 240.6k/98%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 22.7%; usable 25.9%; observed turns 34; actual turns 64
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Yeah


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Yeah — fair.

I do have tool access from this chat side, including web/search-style tools, but that’s different from the **persistent-chat OpenCode MCP config**.

So the distinction is:

- **chat/tool bridge:** yes, I can still use tools like web search from


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 23.4s
Time: model 21.7s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 246.4k; active 5.8k; cache 240.6k/98%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 22.7%; usable 25.9%; observed turns 34; actual turns 64


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Yeah — fair.

I do have tool access from this chat side, including web/search-style tools, but that’s different from the **persistent-chat OpenCode MCP config**.

So the distinction is:

- **chat/tool bridge:** yes, I can still use tools like web search from here
- **persistent-chat MCP entries inside OpenCode:** those specific `playwright` / `duckduckgo` / `searxng` / `brave-search` MCPs are disabled in the current `opencode.json


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 29.9s
Time: model 28.2s, overhead 1.2s
Backend: ses_1a4838151ffe2RE9g5hXeQ8xwX
Turn: p≈2.6ktok/10.6kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 246.4k; active 5.8k; cache 240.6k/98%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 22.7%; usable 25.9%; observed turns 34; actual turns 64