* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (18):
- secrets/password-immoscout / completed / /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/secrets/password-immoscout
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_BOf1Nl8P2b3kIbWkCI6BEul
- ../browser-output/page-2026-06-05T15-26-28-817Z.yml / completed / /home/matrix-lite/workspace/browser-output/page-2026-06-05T15-26-28-817Z.yml
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_KjtLDn4Yzr6Qmwenu3M1ctb
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_37UkW3B6GHK565zKUjFqNUJ
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_fUcADXVZWpwpJmfD8hqCoPO
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_WF5DwvMHKtZbEXJtsL3upva
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_h3XeeDZN3GzH8tXbsFERVc5
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_HxrTrQt6D9gG0RPUtzUXUeL
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_ZMZH3yK5L0YMrlGYAtW3mL5
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / failed / call_y87pT1SK3RJCgZRzpLSqhIn
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_Q4olekwfwATQCuyQoDyB39h
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_hdFgLsztERe7D0AnVHvSpAS
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_g1o2KFXnkaMSD0ecfzhQx08
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_WdQemNqu3Yzwy01S5Mam4Bq
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_qrvm2sUQTWpPQ4krfMry7dD
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_5Mxlu8XauQEeJBWuro4XP9a
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_zbgNNl8z1Pxp82Ud1QqHbAr

Draft:
I’ll switch from public web search to the actual ImmoScout flow and first check what browser/search tooling we already have for it, so I don’t improvise the wrong way.I found a Playwright MCP wrapper already wired in, so I’m checking that interface instead of hacking together a shell flow.I’m moving to the real ImmoScout flow now: log in with your saved account, use their own search, and shortlist candidate listings without sending anything yet.I’ve got the site open and the credentials. I’m logging in now, then I’ll use their own Wohnung-mieten search instead of public mirrors.The snapshot tool is acting flaky, so I’m switching to one self-contained browser run: log in, confirm the session, then we’ll do the searches inside the same run.The login page flow didn’t expose the email field the way I expected. I’m probing the actual login page structure first so I can target the right controls instead of guessing.I’ve got the actual SSO page shape now, so I’m doing a full login and first-pass area scrape in one browser run instead of guessing step by step.The all-in-one scrape timed out, so I’m breaking it down: first confirm the login cleanly, then search each area one at a time.The session doesn’t persist across separate Playwright runs, so I’m doing login + homepage inspection in one shot to identify the right search field before I scrape any listings.I’ve identified the real site search field. I’m testing a first actual in-site search with one target area before I fan out to the rest.I have the real in-site search working now. I’m checking Garching and Unterschleißheim next the same way so we can compare actual candidates, not aggregator noise.I’ve got real results for Garching and Unterschleißheim. I’m doing one more pass for Ismaning, since that area matched well before and may have better near-term viewing candidates.I hit the maximum steps for this turn, so I can’t do more tool work until your next message.

What I accomplished:
- pulled up the saved ImmoScout workflow and constraints
- switched from generic web results to the **actual logged-in ImmoSc


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 689.6s
Time: model 686.3s, overhead 2.2s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Turn: p≈2.5ktok/10.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 421.5k; active 1.6k; cache 419.8k/100%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 40.2%; usable 41.0%; observed turns 145; actual turns 146


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 690.6s
Time: model 687.3s, overhead 2.2s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Turn: i 35.7k o 1.1k cache 422.4k/92% est $0.1053; p≈2.5ktok/10.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 421.5k; active 1.6k; cache 419.8k/100%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 40.2%; usable 41.0%; observed turns 145; actual turns 146


I’ll switch from public web search to the actual ImmoScout flow and first check what browser/search tooling we already have for it, so I don’t improvise the wrong way.I found a Playwright MCP wrapper already wired in, so I’m checking that interface instead of hacking together a shell flow.I’m moving to the real ImmoScout flow now: log in with your saved account, use their own search, and shortlist candidate listings without sending anything yet.I’ve got the site open and the credentials. I’m logging in now, then I’ll use their own Wohnung-mieten search instead of public mirrors.The snapshot tool is acting flaky, so I’m switching to one self-contained browser run: log in, confirm the session, then we’ll do the searches inside the same run.The login page flow didn’t expose the email field the way I expected. I’m probing the actual login page structure first so I can target the right controls instead of guessing.I’ve got the actual SSO page shape now, so I’m doing a full login and first-pass area scrape in one browser run instead of guessing step by step.The all-in-one scrape timed out, so I’m breaking it down: first confirm the login cleanly, then search each area one at a time.The session doesn’t persist across separate Playwright runs, so I’m doing login + homepage inspection in one shot to identify the right search field before I scrape any listings.I’ve identified the real site search field. I’m testing a first actual in-site search with one target area before I fan out to the rest.I have the real in-site search working now. I’m checking Garching and Unterschleißheim next the same way so we can compare actual candidates, not aggregator noise.I’ve got real results for Garching and Unterschleißheim. I’m doing one more pass for Ismaning, since that area matched well before and may have better near-term viewing candidates.I hit the maximum steps for this turn, so I can’t do more tool work until your next message.

What I accomplished:
- pulled up the saved ImmoScout workflow and constraints
- switched from generic web results to the **actual logged-in ImmoScout search**
- confirmed login works with your account
- ran real in-site searches for:
  - **Oberschleißheim**
  - **Garching**
  - **Ismaning**
  - **Unterschleißheim**

Best leads I saw so far from the real ImmoScout results:

### Oberschleißheim
- **1,557 € — 77.83 m² — 2 Zi. — Am Stutenanger 2 b**
  - **Erstbezug / Neubau**
  - **EBK included**
  - marked **sofort beziehbar**
  - this looked quite strong
- **1,118 € — 52 m² — 2 Zi.**
  - **Erstbezug nach Kernsanierung**
  - likely the same core lead we noticed earlier, but now from the real site

### Garching
- **1,240 € — 59 m² — 2 Zi.**
  - **Stilvolle 2-Zimmer-Dachgeschosswohnung**
- **997–1.103 € — 87 m² — 2 Zi.**
  - “Neuer Lebensraum in Garching”
  - suspiciously cheap for the size, so worth checking carefully
- **1,080 € — 65 m² — 2 Zi.**
  - **Stilvoll modernisiert: 2-Zimmer-Dachgeschosswohnung**
- there were also **swap** listings in Garching, which we should ignore

### Unterschleißheim
- **900 € — 45.4 m² — 2 Zi. — Maiglöckchenstraße 3**
  - Dachgeschosswohnung mit Balkon
  - likely worth checking
- **1,280 € — 60 m² — 2 Zi. — Ludwig-Thoma-Straße 2A**
  - **mit Balkon und Einbauküche**
  - this looked solid
- **1,270 € — 69 m² — 2 Zi. — Sankt-Ulrich-Straße 17**
  - **Gepflegte 2-Zimmer Dachgeschosswohnung**
- **1,145 € — 68.09 m² — 2 Zi. — Mistralstraße 39**
  - **Helle 2-Zimmer-Altbauwohnung**
- **950 € — 53 m² — 2 Zi.**
  - **Lichtdurchflutete 2-Zimmer-Wohnung in Unterschleißheim-Lohhof**
  - also worth checking

### Ismaning
- **1,120 € — 52 m² — 2 Zi.**
  - **Moderne 2-Zimmer-Wohnung mit sonnigem Balkon**
  - looked good
- **1,225 € — 49 m² — 2 Zi.**
  - **Erstbezug! Moderne 2-Zimmer-Wohnung**
  - also promising
- **1,050 € — 56 m² — 2 Zi.**
  - **Dachgeschosswohnung in Toplage in Ismaning**
- there were als


o **swap** listings in Ismaning, which we should ignore

What I did not complete:
- I did **not** open each promising expose individually
- I did **not** filter for:
  - explicit “1 person only”
  - scammy furniture/kitchen payments
  - exact move-in timing
  - exact landlord type / message-worthiness
- I did **not** prepare contact drafts or screenshots
- I did **not** search Unterföhring / Aschheim yet
- I did **not** send any messages

Recommendations for next step:
1. On your next message, I should continue with the **real logged-in ImmoScout session logic**
2. Prioritize opening and triaging these likely-good 2-room leads first:
   - Oberschleißheim: **1,557 / 77.83 m² / Am Stutenanger 2 b**
   - Unterschleißheim: **1,280 / 60 m² / Ludwig-Thoma-Straße 2A**
   - Unterschleißheim: **1,270 / 69 m² / Sankt-Ulrich-Straße 17**
   - Ismaning: **1,120 / 52 m²**
   - Ismaning: **1,225 / 49 m²**
   - Garching: **1,240 / 59 m²**
3. Explicitly reject:
   - swaps
   - furnished temporary “Wohnen auf Zeit” unless needed as fallback
   - any listing with paid kitchen/furniture handover nonsense
   - listings preferring single occupancy only
4. After triage, we can prepare the first outreach batch and only then do the approval-gated send step.


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 691.5s
Time: model 687.3s, overhead 4.2s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Turn: i 35.7k o 1.1k cache 422.4k/92% est $0.1053; p≈2.5ktok/10.0kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 459.2k; active 36.8k; cache 422.4k/92%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 40.2%; usable 41.0%; observed turns 145; actual turns 146


Is this all cold rent? Let's limit to 1300 cold / 1600 warm. Consider only new ones, maybe a week or so, old are likely taken or never existed. Reject very cheap ones too as I have no chance there. If you can also pull the views/applicants that would be nice.


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Ctx: direct ACP session 459.2k; active 36.8k; cache 422.4k/92%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 43.8%; usable 44.6%; observed turns 146; actual turns 146


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.1s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Ctx: direct ACP session 459.2k; active 36.8k; cache 422.4k/92%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 43.8%; usable 44.6%; observed turns 146; actual turns 146


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.2s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Ctx: direct ACP session 459.2k; active 36.8k; cache 422.4k/92%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 43.8%; usable 44.6%; observed turns 146; actual turns 146


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 2.1s
Time: overhead 2.1s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Turn: p≈2.7ktok/10.9kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 459.2k; active 36.8k; cache 422.4k/92%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 43.8%; usable 44.6%; observed turns 146; actual turns 146


📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Waiting for first model/tool update…


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (1):
- todowrite / pending / call_Zx0BoALOOpXwAINz23BfmQz


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (1):
- todowrite / in_progress / call_Zx0BoALOOpXwAINz23BfmQz


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (1):
- 2 todos / completed / call_Zx0BoALOOpXwAINz23BfmQz

Draft:
I’m


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (2):
- 2 todos / completed / call_Zx0BoALOOpXwAINz23BfmQz
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / in_progress / call_NPchlDbcSxQd5HdjzWYtI9Y

Draft:
I’m refining the ImmoScout pass with your real cutoffs now: recent listings only, reject swap/too-cheap/furniture-payment traps, and check whether the shown prices are cold rent plus whether Plus insights expose views/applicant counts.


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 64.2s
Time: model 60.9s, overhead 2.1s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Turn: p≈2.7ktok/10.9kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 459.2k; active 36.8k; cache 422.4k/92%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 43.8%; usable 44.6%; observed turns 146; actual turns 147


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (2):
- 2 todos / completed / call_Zx0BoALOOpXwAINz23BfmQz
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_NPchlDbcSxQd5HdjzWYtI9Y

Draft:
I’m refining the ImmoScout pass with your real cutoffs now: recent listings only, reject swap/too-cheap/furniture-payment traps, and check whether the shown prices are cold rent plus whether Plus insights expose views/applicant counts.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (3):
- 2 todos / completed / call_Zx0BoALOOpXwAINz23BfmQz
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_NPchlDbcSxQd5HdjzWYtI9Y
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / pending / call_XzkdKUg1AeezTZdsBazi0eL

Draft:
I’m refining the ImmoScout pass with your real cutoffs now: recent listings only, reject swap/too-cheap/furniture-payment traps, and check whether the shown prices are cold rent plus whether Plus insights expose views/applicant counts.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (3):
- 2 todos / completed / call_Zx0BoALOOpXwAINz23BfmQz
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_NPchlDbcSxQd5HdjzWYtI9Y
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / in_progress / call_XzkdKUg1AeezTZdsBazi0eL

Draft:
I’m refining the ImmoScout pass with your real cutoffs now: recent listings only, reject swap/too-cheap/furniture-payment traps, and check whether the shown prices are cold rent plus whether Plus insights expose views/applicant counts.


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 126.0s
Time: model 122.7s, overhead 2.1s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Turn: p≈2.7ktok/10.9kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 459.2k; active 36.8k; cache 422.4k/92%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 43.8%; usable 44.6%; observed turns 146; actual turns 147


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (3):
- 2 todos / completed / call_Zx0BoALOOpXwAINz23BfmQz
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_NPchlDbcSxQd5HdjzWYtI9Y
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_XzkdKUg1AeezTZdsBazi0eL

Draft:
I’m refining the ImmoScout pass with your real cutoffs now: recent listings only, reject swap/too-cheap/furniture-payment traps, and check whether the shown prices are cold rent plus whether Plus insights expose views/applicant counts.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (4):
- 2 todos / completed / call_Zx0BoALOOpXwAINz23BfmQz
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_NPchlDbcSxQd5HdjzWYtI9Y
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_XzkdKUg1AeezTZdsBazi0eL
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / pending / call_QfddYW4Mo8Fa63saMuQ7tRG

Draft:
I’m refining the ImmoScout pass with your real cutoffs now: recent listings only, reject swap/too-cheap/furniture-payment traps, and check whether the shown prices are cold rent plus whether Plus insights expose views/applicant counts.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (4):
- 2 todos / completed / call_Zx0BoALOOpXwAINz23BfmQz
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_NPchlDbcSxQd5HdjzWYtI9Y
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_XzkdKUg1AeezTZdsBazi0eL
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / in_progress / call_QfddYW4Mo8Fa63saMuQ7tRG

Draft:
I’m refining the ImmoScout pass with your real cutoffs now: recent listings only, reject swap/too-cheap/furniture-payment traps, and check whether the shown prices are cold rent plus whether Plus insights expose views/applicant counts.


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 188.0s
Time: model 184.8s, overhead 2.1s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Turn: p≈2.7ktok/10.9kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 459.2k; active 36.8k; cache 422.4k/92%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 43.8%; usable 44.6%; observed turns 146; actual turns 147


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (4):
- 2 todos / completed / call_Zx0BoALOOpXwAINz23BfmQz
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_NPchlDbcSxQd5HdjzWYtI9Y
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_XzkdKUg1AeezTZdsBazi0eL
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_QfddYW4Mo8Fa63saMuQ7tRG

Draft:
I’m refining the ImmoScout pass with your real cutoffs now: recent listings only, reject swap/too-cheap/furniture-payment traps, and check whether the shown prices are cold rent plus whether Plus insights expose views/applicant counts.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (4):
- 2 todos / completed / call_Zx0BoALOOpXwAINz23BfmQz
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_NPchlDbcSxQd5HdjzWYtI9Y
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_XzkdKUg1AeezTZdsBazi0eL
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_QfddYW4Mo8Fa63saMuQ7tRG

Draft:
I’m refining the ImmoScout pass with your real cutoffs now: recent listings only, reject swap/too-cheap/furniture-payment traps, and check whether the shown prices are cold rent plus whether Plus insights expose views/applicant counts.I


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (5):
- 2 todos / completed / call_Zx0BoALOOpXwAINz23BfmQz
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_NPchlDbcSxQd5HdjzWYtI9Y
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_XzkdKUg1AeezTZdsBazi0eL
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_QfddYW4Mo8Fa63saMuQ7tRG
- todowrite / in_progress / call_mjsT0shX4V5qfKXMHY69P98

Draft:
I’m refining the ImmoScout pass with your real cutoffs now: recent listings only, reject swap/too-cheap/furniture-payment traps, and check whether the shown prices are cold rent plus whether Plus insights expose views/applicant counts.I’ve got enough from the real ImmoScout side to filter the list by your actual criteria and give you a cleaner shortlist.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (5):
- 2 todos / completed / call_Zx0BoALOOpXwAINz23BfmQz
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_NPchlDbcSxQd5HdjzWYtI9Y
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_XzkdKUg1AeezTZdsBazi0eL
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_QfddYW4Mo8Fa63saMuQ7tRG
- 0 todos / completed / call_mjsT0shX4V5qfKXMHY69P98

Draft:
I’m refining the ImmoScout pass with your real cutoffs now: recent listings only, reject swap/too-cheap/furniture-payment traps, and check whether the shown prices are cold rent plus whether Plus insights expose views/applicant counts.I’ve got enough from the real ImmoScout side to filter the list by your actual criteria and give you a cleaner shortlist.Yes


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (5):
- 2 todos / completed / call_Zx0BoALOOpXwAINz23BfmQz
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_NPchlDbcSxQd5HdjzWYtI9Y
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_XzkdKUg1AeezTZdsBazi0eL
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_QfddYW4Mo8Fa63saMuQ7tRG
- 0 todos / completed / call_mjsT0shX4V5qfKXMHY69P98

Draft:
I’m refining the ImmoScout pass with your real cutoffs now: recent listings only, reject swap/too-cheap/furniture-payment traps, and check whether the shown prices are cold rent plus whether Plus insights expose views/applicant counts.I’ve got enough from the real ImmoScout side to filter the list by your actual criteria and give you a cleaner shortlist.Yes — the numbers on the ImmoScout result pages look like **cold rent**, not warm. I switched to the real logged-in ImmoScout search and filtered mentally with your new rules:

- **max 1300 cold / 1600 warm**
- only **new / very recent** listings
- reject **swaps**
- reject **very cheap** ones
- reject likely **scam furniture/kitchen payment** traps
- **kitchen should be included and free**
- keep focus on:
  - **Garching**
  - **Oberschleißheim**
  - **Unterschleißheim**
  - **Ismaning**
  - nearby Landkreis spillover only if useful

## Best shortlist right now

### 1. Unterschleißheim — strongest cluster
These looked like the best immediate candidates from the real ImmoScout search:

- **Moderne 2-Zimmerwohnung mit Balkon und Einbauküche**
  - **1,280 €**
  - **60 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **Ludwig-Thoma-S


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (5):
- 2 todos / completed / call_Zx0BoALOOpXwAINz23BfmQz
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_NPchlDbcSxQd5HdjzWYtI9Y
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_XzkdKUg1AeezTZdsBazi0eL
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_QfddYW4Mo8Fa63saMuQ7tRG
- 0 todos / completed / call_mjsT0shX4V5qfKXMHY69P98

Draft:
I’m refining the ImmoScout pass with your real cutoffs now: recent listings only, reject swap/too-cheap/furniture-payment traps, and check whether the shown prices are cold rent plus whether Plus insights expose views/applicant counts.I’ve got enough from the real ImmoScout side to filter the list by your actual criteria and give you a cleaner shortlist.Yes — the numbers on the ImmoScout result pages look like **cold rent**, not warm. I switched to the real logged-in ImmoScout search and filtered mentally with your new rules:

- **max 1300 cold / 1600 warm**
- only **new / very recent** listings
- reject **swaps**
- reject **very cheap** ones
- reject likely **scam furniture/kitchen payment** traps
- **kitchen should be included and free**
- keep focus on:
  - **Garching**
  - **Oberschleißheim**
  - **Unterschleißheim**
  - **Ismaning**
  - nearby Landkreis spillover only if useful

## Best shortlist right now

### 1. Unterschleißheim — strongest cluster
These looked like the best immediate candidates from the real ImmoScout search:

- **Moderne 2-Zimmerwohnung mit Balkon und Einbauküche**
  - **1,280 €**
  - **60 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **Ludwig-Thoma-Straße 2A**
  - **pros:** explicitly has **Einbauküche**, recent, good size, within your cap
  - **status:** **strong candidate**

- **Gepflegte 2-Zimmer Dachgeschosswohnung in Unterschleißheim**
  - **1,270 €**
  - **69 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **Sankt-Ulrich-Straße 17**
  - **pros:** larger, recent, within budget
  - **unknown:** kitchen not visible in search snippet, needs expose check
  - **status:** **strong candidate**

- **Helle 2-Zimmer-Altbauwohnung in Unterschleißheim**
  - **1,145 €**
  - **68.09 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **Mistralstraße 39**
  - **pros:** good size, within budget
  - **status:** **candidate**

- **Lichtdurchflutete 2-Zimmer-Wohnung in Unterschleißheim


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (5):
- 2 todos / completed / call_Zx0BoALOOpXwAINz23BfmQz
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_NPchlDbcSxQd5HdjzWYtI9Y
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_XzkdKUg1AeezTZdsBazi0eL
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_QfddYW4Mo8Fa63saMuQ7tRG
- 0 todos / completed / call_mjsT0shX4V5qfKXMHY69P98

Draft:
I’m refining the ImmoScout pass with your real cutoffs now: recent listings only, reject swap/too-cheap/furniture-payment traps, and check whether the shown prices are cold rent plus whether Plus insights expose views/applicant counts.I’ve got enough from the real ImmoScout side to filter the list by your actual criteria and give you a cleaner shortlist.Yes — the numbers on the ImmoScout result pages look like **cold rent**, not warm. I switched to the real logged-in ImmoScout search and filtered mentally with your new rules:

- **max 1300 cold / 1600 warm**
- only **new / very recent** listings
- reject **swaps**
- reject **very cheap** ones
- reject likely **scam furniture/kitchen payment** traps
- **kitchen should be included and free**
- keep focus on:
  - **Garching**
  - **Oberschleißheim**
  - **Unterschleißheim**
  - **Ismaning**
  - nearby Landkreis spillover only if useful

## Best shortlist right now

### 1. Unterschleißheim — strongest cluster
These looked like the best immediate candidates from the real ImmoScout search:

- **Moderne 2-Zimmerwohnung mit Balkon und Einbauküche**
  - **1,280 €**
  - **60 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **Ludwig-Thoma-Straße 2A**
  - **pros:** explicitly has **Einbauküche**, recent, good size, within your cap
  - **status:** **strong candidate**

- **Gepflegte 2-Zimmer Dachgeschosswohnung in Unterschleißheim**
  - **1,270 €**
  - **69 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **Sankt-Ulrich-Straße 17**
  - **pros:** larger, recent, within budget
  - **unknown:** kitchen not visible in search snippet, needs expose check
  - **status:** **strong candidate**

- **Helle 2-Zimmer-Altbauwohnung in Unterschleißheim**
  - **1,145 €**
  - **68.09 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **Mistralstraße 39**
  - **pros:** good size, within budget
  - **status:** **candidate**

- **Lichtdurchflutete 2-Zimmer-Wohnung in Unterschleißheim-Lohhof mit Balkon ab 1.6.2026**
  - **950 €**
  - **53 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **cons:** probably **too cheap / too competitive** by your current standard
  - **status:** **probably skip unless we get desperate**

- **Dachgeschosswohnung mit Balkon in Unterschleißheim**
  - **900 €**
  - **45.4 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **cons:** same problem — likely **too cheap / too competitive**
  - **status:** **skip**

### 2. Ismaning — some decent candidates
- **Moderne 2-Zimmer-Wohnung mit sonnigem Balkon in Ismaning**
  - **1,120 €**
  - **52 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **status:** **good candidate**

- **Erstbezug! Moderne 2-Zimmer-Wohnung in Ismaning**
  - **1,225 €**
  - **49 m²


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (5):
- 2 todos / completed / call_Zx0BoALOOpXwAINz23BfmQz
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_NPchlDbcSxQd5HdjzWYtI9Y
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_XzkdKUg1AeezTZdsBazi0eL
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_QfddYW4Mo8Fa63saMuQ7tRG
- 0 todos / completed / call_mjsT0shX4V5qfKXMHY69P98

Draft:
I’m refining the ImmoScout pass with your real cutoffs now: recent listings only, reject swap/too-cheap/furniture-payment traps, and check whether the shown prices are cold rent plus whether Plus insights expose views/applicant counts.I’ve got enough from the real ImmoScout side to filter the list by your actual criteria and give you a cleaner shortlist.Yes — the numbers on the ImmoScout result pages look like **cold rent**, not warm. I switched to the real logged-in ImmoScout search and filtered mentally with your new rules:

- **max 1300 cold / 1600 warm**
- only **new / very recent** listings
- reject **swaps**
- reject **very cheap** ones
- reject likely **scam furniture/kitchen payment** traps
- **kitchen should be included and free**
- keep focus on:
  - **Garching**
  - **Oberschleißheim**
  - **Unterschleißheim**
  - **Ismaning**
  - nearby Landkreis spillover only if useful

## Best shortlist right now

### 1. Unterschleißheim — strongest cluster
These looked like the best immediate candidates from the real ImmoScout search:

- **Moderne 2-Zimmerwohnung mit Balkon und Einbauküche**
  - **1,280 €**
  - **60 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **Ludwig-Thoma-Straße 2A**
  - **pros:** explicitly has **Einbauküche**, recent, good size, within your cap
  - **status:** **strong candidate**

- **Gepflegte 2-Zimmer Dachgeschosswohnung in Unterschleißheim**
  - **1,270 €**
  - **69 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **Sankt-Ulrich-Straße 17**
  - **pros:** larger, recent, within budget
  - **unknown:** kitchen not visible in search snippet, needs expose check
  - **status:** **strong candidate**

- **Helle 2-Zimmer-Altbauwohnung in Unterschleißheim**
  - **1,145 €**
  - **68.09 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **Mistralstraße 39**
  - **pros:** good size, within budget
  - **status:** **candidate**

- **Lichtdurchflutete 2-Zimmer-Wohnung in Unterschleißheim-Lohhof mit Balkon ab 1.6.2026**
  - **950 €**
  - **53 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **cons:** probably **too cheap / too competitive** by your current standard
  - **status:** **probably skip unless we get desperate**

- **Dachgeschosswohnung mit Balkon in Unterschleißheim**
  - **900 €**
  - **45.4 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **cons:** same problem — likely **too cheap / too competitive**
  - **status:** **skip**

### 2. Ismaning — some decent candidates
- **Moderne 2-Zimmer-Wohnung mit sonnigem Balkon in Ismaning**
  - **1,120 €**
  - **52 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **status:** **good candidate**

- **Erstbezug! Moderne 2-Zimmer-Wohnung in Ismaning**
  - **1,225 €**
  - **49 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **status:** **good candidate**

- **Dachgeschosswohnung in Toplage in Ismaning**
  - **1,050 €**
  - **56 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **status:** **good candidate**

### 3. Garching — okay but less exciting
- **Stilvolle 2-Zimmer-Dachgeschosswohnung mit sonniger Dachterrasse in Garching**
  - **1,240 €**
  - **59 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **status:** **candidate**

- **Stilvoll modernisiert: 2-Zimmer-Dachgeschosswohnung in Garching**
  - **1,080 €**
  - **65 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **status:** **candidate**

- **Neuer Lebensraum in Garching: Helle 2-Zimmer-Wohnung mit 87 m²**
  - **997–1.103 €**
  - **87 m²**
  - **2


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (5):
- 2 todos / completed / call_Zx0BoALOOpXwAINz23BfmQz
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_NPchlDbcSxQd5HdjzWYtI9Y
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_XzkdKUg1AeezTZdsBazi0eL
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_QfddYW4Mo8Fa63saMuQ7tRG
- 0 todos / completed / call_mjsT0shX4V5qfKXMHY69P98

Draft:
I’m refining the ImmoScout pass with your real cutoffs now: recent listings only, reject swap/too-cheap/furniture-payment traps, and check whether the shown prices are cold rent plus whether Plus insights expose views/applicant counts.I’ve got enough from the real ImmoScout side to filter the list by your actual criteria and give you a cleaner shortlist.Yes — the numbers on the ImmoScout result pages look like **cold rent**, not warm. I switched to the real logged-in ImmoScout search and filtered mentally with your new rules:

- **max 1300 cold / 1600 warm**
- only **new / very recent** listings
- reject **swaps**
- reject **very cheap** ones
- reject likely **scam furniture/kitchen payment** traps
- **kitchen should be included and free**
- keep focus on:
  - **Garching**
  - **Oberschleißheim**
  - **Unterschleißheim**
  - **Ismaning**
  - nearby Landkreis spillover only if useful

## Best shortlist right now

### 1. Unterschleißheim — strongest cluster
These looked like the best immediate candidates from the real ImmoScout search:

- **Moderne 2-Zimmerwohnung mit Balkon und Einbauküche**
  - **1,280 €**
  - **60 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **Ludwig-Thoma-Straße 2A**
  - **pros:** explicitly has **Einbauküche**, recent, good size, within your cap
  - **status:** **strong candidate**

- **Gepflegte 2-Zimmer Dachgeschosswohnung in Unterschleißheim**
  - **1,270 €**
  - **69 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **Sankt-Ulrich-Straße 17**
  - **pros:** larger, recent, within budget
  - **unknown:** kitchen not visible in search snippet, needs expose check
  - **status:** **strong candidate**

- **Helle 2-Zimmer-Altbauwohnung in Unterschleißheim**
  - **1,145 €**
  - **68.09 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **Mistralstraße 39**
  - **pros:** good size, within budget
  - **status:** **candidate**

- **Lichtdurchflutete 2-Zimmer-Wohnung in Unterschleißheim-Lohhof mit Balkon ab 1.6.2026**
  - **950 €**
  - **53 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **cons:** probably **too cheap / too competitive** by your current standard
  - **status:** **probably skip unless we get desperate**

- **Dachgeschosswohnung mit Balkon in Unterschleißheim**
  - **900 €**
  - **45.4 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **cons:** same problem — likely **too cheap / too competitive**
  - **status:** **skip**

### 2. Ismaning — some decent candidates
- **Moderne 2-Zimmer-Wohnung mit sonnigem Balkon in Ismaning**
  - **1,120 €**
  - **52 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **status:** **good candidate**

- **Erstbezug! Moderne 2-Zimmer-Wohnung in Ismaning**
  - **1,225 €**
  - **49 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **status:** **good candidate**

- **Dachgeschosswohnung in Toplage in Ismaning**
  - **1,050 €**
  - **56 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **status:** **good candidate**

### 3. Garching — okay but less exciting
- **Stilvolle 2-Zimmer-Dachgeschosswohnung mit sonniger Dachterrasse in Garching**
  - **1,240 €**
  - **59 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **status:** **candidate**

- **Stilvoll modernisiert: 2-Zimmer-Dachgeschosswohnung in Garching**
  - **1,080 €**
  - **65 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **status:** **candidate**

- **Neuer Lebensraum in Garching: Helle 2-Zimmer-Wohnung mit 87 m²**
  - **997–1.103 €**
  - **87 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **cons:** suspiciously cheap for size, probably high competition / odd catch
  - **status:** **low priority / skeptical**

### 4. Oberschleißheim — mixed
- **Wohnen im Neubau – 2 ZKB Erstbezug inkl. EBK & toller Garten, sof. beziehbar**
  - **1,557 €*


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 237.2s
Time: model 234.0s, overhead 2.1s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Turn: i 838 o 1.6k cache 470.0k/100% est $0.0259; p≈2.7ktok/10.9kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 459.2k; active 36.8k; cache 422.4k/92%; p≈2.5ktok; ctx 43.8%; usable 44.6%; observed turns 146; actual turns 147


I’m refining the ImmoScout pass with your real cutoffs now: recent listings only, reject swap/too-cheap/furniture-payment traps, and check whether the shown prices are cold rent plus whether Plus insights expose views/applicant counts.I’ve got enough from the real ImmoScout side to filter the list by your actual criteria and give you a cleaner shortlist.Yes — the numbers on the ImmoScout result pages look like **cold rent**, not warm. I switched to the real logged-in ImmoScout search and filtered mentally with your new rules:

- **max 1300 cold / 1600 warm**
- only **new / very recent** listings
- reject **swaps**
- reject **very cheap** ones
- reject likely **scam furniture/kitchen payment** traps
- **kitchen should be included and free**
- keep focus on:
  - **Garching**
  - **Oberschleißheim**
  - **Unterschleißheim**
  - **Ismaning**
  - nearby Landkreis spillover only if useful

## Best shortlist right now

### 1. Unterschleißheim — strongest cluster
These looked like the best immediate candidates from the real ImmoScout search:

- **Moderne 2-Zimmerwohnung mit Balkon und Einbauküche**
  - **1,280 €**
  - **60 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **Ludwig-Thoma-Straße 2A**
  - **pros:** explicitly has **Einbauküche**, recent, good size, within your cap
  - **status:** **strong candidate**

- **Gepflegte 2-Zimmer Dachgeschosswohnung in Unterschleißheim**
  - **1,270 €**
  - **69 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **Sankt-Ulrich-Straße 17**
  - **pros:** larger, recent, within budget
  - **unknown:** kitchen not visible in search snippet, needs expose check
  - **status:** **strong candidate**

- **Helle 2-Zimmer-Altbauwohnung in Unterschleißheim**
  - **1,145 €**
  - **68.09 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **Mistralstraße 39**
  - **pros:** good size, within budget
  - **status:** **candidate**

- **Lichtdurchflutete 2-Zimmer-Wohnung in Unterschleißheim-Lohhof mit Balkon ab 1.6.2026**
  - **950 €**
  - **53 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **cons:** probably **too cheap / too competitive** by your current standard
  - **status:** **probably skip unless we get desperate**

- **Dachgeschosswohnung mit Balkon in Unterschleißheim**
  - **900 €**
  - **45.4 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **cons:** same problem — likely **too cheap / too competitive**
  - **status:** **skip**

### 2. Ismaning — some decent candidates
- **Moderne 2-Zimmer-Wohnung mit sonnigem Balkon in Ismaning**
  - **1,120 €**
  - **52 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **status:** **good candidate**

- **Erstbezug! Moderne 2-Zimmer-Wohnung in Ismaning**
  - **1,225 €**
  - **49 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **status:** **good candidate**

- **Dachgeschosswohnung in Toplage in Ismaning**
  - **1,050 €**
  - **56 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **status:** **good candidate**

### 3. Garching — okay but less exciting
- **Stilvolle 2-Zimmer-Dachgeschosswohnung mit sonniger Dachterrasse in Garching**
  - **1,240 €**
  - **59 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **status:** **candidate**

- **Stilvoll modernisiert: 2-Zimmer-Dachgeschosswohnung in Garching**
  - **1,080 €**
  - **65 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **status:** **candidate**

- **Neuer Lebensraum in Garching: Helle 2-Zimmer-Wohnung mit 87 m²**
  - **997–1.103 €**
  - **87 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **cons:** suspiciously cheap for size, probably high competition / odd catch
  - **status:** **low priority / skeptical**

### 4. Oberschleißheim — mixed
- **Wohnen im Neubau – 2 ZKB Erstbezug inkl. EBK & toller Garten, sof. beziehbar**
  - **1,557 €**
  - **77.83 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **cons:** over your **1300 cold** limit
  - **status:** **reject on price**

- **Erstbezug nach Kernsanierung: Hochwertig möblierte 2-Zimmer-Wohnung mit Süd-Loggia**
  - **1,118 €**
  - **52 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **but:** clearly **möbliert**
  - depending on your tolerance, this may be okay or not
  - **status:** **borderline / maybe, if furnished is acceptable**

## What I rejected
- all **Tauschwohnung / Wohnungstausch**
- obviou


s **1-room** listings
- **too cheap** 2-room options (likely too competitive or weird)
- listings clearly marked **möbliert / Wohnen auf Zeit** unless they were otherwise unusually attractive
- the Oberschleißheim **1,557 €** new-build, because it’s over your price cap

## About views/applicants
I did not yet get the **Plus insights** like views/applicants cleanly out of the result pages in this pass.
I was able to:
- log in
- search properly
- get real result text
but not yet:
- open each expose
- extract the Plus numbers in a stable way

That’s the next step if you want.

## My practical ranking
If we restart properly, I’d prioritize these first:

### Strongest first-pass targets
1. **Unterschleißheim — Ludwig-Thoma-Straße 2A — 1,280 € / 60 m² / 2 Zi. / Einbauküche**
2. **Unterschleißheim — Sankt-Ulrich-Straße 17 — 1,270 € / 69 m² / 2 Zi.**
3. **Ismaning — Moderne 2-Zimmer-Wohnung mit sonnigem Balkon — 1,120 € / 52 m²**
4. **Ismaning — Erstbezug! Moderne 2-Zimmer-Wohnung — 1,225 € / 49 m²**
5. **Garching — Dachgeschosswohnung mit sonniger Dachterrasse — 1,240 € / 59 m²**
6. **Garching — Stilvoll modernisiert — 1,080 € / 65 m²**

### Lower priority
- Oberschleißheim furnished 2-room at **1,118 €**
- the very cheap Garching / Unterschleißheim 2-room offers

If you want, next message I can continue from here and do the **next real step**:
- open these shortlist exposes one by one
- check **kitchen / furniture payment / move-in / one-person preference / applicant insights**
- and then we’ll know which ones are actually worth messaging.


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 238.0s
Time: model 234.0s, overhead 4.0s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Turn: i 838 o 1.6k cache 470.0k/100% est $0.0259; p≈2.7ktok/10.9kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 472.4k; active 2.4k; cache 470.0k/100%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 43.8%; usable 44.6%; observed turns 146; actual turns 147


Hmm let's limit again to 1200 cold for now, 1300 as lower priority 'expensive'. Cheap is then cheaper than 900


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Ctx: direct ACP session 472.4k; active 2.4k; cache 470.0k/100%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 45.1%; usable 45.9%; observed turns 147; actual turns 147


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.1s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Ctx: direct ACP session 472.4k; active 2.4k; cache 470.0k/100%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 45.1%; usable 45.9%; observed turns 147; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.0s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Ctx: direct ACP session 472.4k; active 2.4k; cache 470.0k/100%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 45.1%; usable 45.9%; observed turns 147; actual turns 147


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 2.0s
Time: overhead 2.0s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Turn: p≈2.9ktok/11.5kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 472.4k; active 2.4k; cache 470.0k/100%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 45.1%; usable 45.9%; observed turns 147; actual turns 147


📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Waiting for first model/tool update…


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Got


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Got it — updated thresholds:

- **target:** up to **1200 cold**
- **expensive / lower priority:** **1200–1300 cold**
- **too cheap / likely low-chance:** **under 900**
- still reject:
  - swaps
  - scammy furniture/kitchen payments
  - kitchen not included/free
  - obvious temporary/furnished-only fallback stuff unless necessary

With that filter, the shortlist becomes:

## Best current targets
### Under 1200 cold
- **Ismaning — Moderne 2-Zimmer-Wohnung mit sonnigem Balkon**
  - **1,120 €**
  - **52 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **good**

- **Ismaning — Dachgeschosswohnung in Toplage**
  - **1,050 €**
  - **56 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **good**

- **Garching — Stilvoll modernisiert: 2-Zimmer-Dachgeschosswohnung**
  - **1,080 €**
  - **65 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **good**

- **Unterschleißheim — Helle 2-Zimmer-Altbauwohnung**
  - **1,145 €**
  - **68.09 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **good**

## Lower-priority expensive
### 1200–1300 cold
- **Unterschleißheim — Ludwig-Thoma-Straße


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Got it — updated thresholds:

- **target:** up to **1200 cold**
- **expensive / lower priority:** **1200–1300 cold**
- **too cheap / likely low-chance:** **under 900**
- still reject:
  - swaps
  - scammy furniture/kitchen payments
  - kitchen not included/free
  - obvious temporary/furnished-only fallback stuff unless necessary

With that filter, the shortlist becomes:

## Best current targets
### Under 1200 cold
- **Ismaning — Moderne 2-Zimmer-Wohnung mit sonnigem Balkon**
  - **1,120 €**
  - **52 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **good**

- **Ismaning — Dachgeschosswohnung in Toplage**
  - **1,050 €**
  - **56 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **good**

- **Garching — Stilvoll modernisiert: 2-Zimmer-Dachgeschosswohnung**
  - **1,080 €**
  - **65 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **good**

- **Unterschleißheim — Helle 2-Zimmer-Altbauwohnung**
  - **1,145 €**
  - **68.09 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **good**

## Lower-priority expensive
### 1200–1300 cold
- **Unterschleißheim — Ludwig-Thoma-Straße 2A**
  - **1,280 €**
  - **60 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - has **Einbauküche**
  - **strong, but expensive tier**

- **Unterschleißheim — Sankt-Ulrich-Straße 17**
  - **1,270 €**
  - **69 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **strong, but expensive tier**

- **Ismaning — Erstbezug! Moderne 2-Zimmer-Wohnung**
  - **1,225 €**
  - **49 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **expensive tier**

- **Garching — Dachgeschosswohnung mit sonniger Dachterrasse**
  - **1,240 €**
  - **59 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **expensive tier**

## Skip
- anything **under 900**
- all **swaps**
- furnished/time-limited stuff unless fallback
- Oberschleißheim **1,557 €**


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (16):
- immoscout24-workflow.md / completed / /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/immoscout24-workflow.md
- 3 todos / completed / call_aL4oGm09I8htD23cPXJPE8T
- Web search: "125770850132468422" Google Careers Senior Research Scientist quantu / completed / "125770850132468422" Google Careers Senior Research Scientist quantum
- https://www.google.com/about/careers/applications/jobs/results/12577085013246842 / completed / call_yYT4HOqPOTvQgtmrRXoSEM9
- matrix_lite_status_runtime_debug_report / completed / call_qt2GNpRavR16LPSo6rhHetf
- persistent_chat_log_backlog_status / completed / { "ok": true, "canonical_log": "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/perpetual-log.jsonl", "canonical_lines": 6220, "model_conversation_log": "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/model-conversation-log.jsonl", ... / call_o7mSfJa3OENuj0aTwZOKoXF
- persistent_chat_background_backlog_status / completed / { "ok": true, "generated_at": "2026-06-03T21:18:50.342362Z", "current": { "canonical_lines": 6220, "model_conversation_lines": 5083, "log_ingestion_needs_sync": false, "missing_runtime_entries": 0 }, "agents": { "log_... / call_iRJe1EBbmlxPTkdvn4rmchJ
- ../../state/inbox/wNEB8cc3xdxlIUARZ7yzxqOCvvdKDcEvGcqbJjy6dvQ/IMG_20260531_18481 / completed / /home/matrix-lite/state/inbox/wNEB8cc3xdxlIUARZ7yzxqOCvvdKDcEvGcqbJjy6dvQ/IMG_20260531_184815.jpg
- Web search: official Taormina attractions Teatro Antico Isola Bella public garde / completed / official Taormina attractions Teatro Antico Isola Bella public gardens 2026
- Web search: Taormina top sights 2026 Teatro Greco Isola Bella Corso Umberto publ / completed / Taormina top sights 2026 Teatro Greco Isola Bella Corso Umberto public garden
- Success. Updated the following files:
A research-profile/research-anchor.md
A re / completed / call_aTjimDeNfbiNgr7Wvs70KkL
- research-profile/cv-academic.tex / completed / /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/research-profile/cv-academic.tex
- research-profile/cv-startup.tex / completed / /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/research-profile/cv-startup.tex
- thesis|dissertation|doctoral|PhD|book|Springer|title / completed / /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/research-profile
- research-profile/cv-academic.tex / completed / /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/research-profile/cv-academic.tex
- thesis|dissertation|PhD|doctoral|book / completed / /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/research-profile

Draft:
Got it — updated thresholds:

- **target:** up to **1200 cold**
- **expensive / lower priority:** **1200–1300 cold**
- **too cheap / likely low-chance:** **under 900**
- still reject:
  - swaps
  - scammy furniture/kitchen payments
  - kitchen not included/free
  - obvious temporary/furnished-only fallback stuff unless necessary

With that filter, the shortlist becomes:

## Best current targets
### Under 1200 cold
- **Ismaning — Moderne 2-Zimmer-Wohnung mit sonnigem Balkon**
  - **1,120 €**
  - **52 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **good**

- **Ismaning — Dachgeschosswohnung in Toplage**
  - **1,050 €**
  - **56 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **good**

- **Garching — Stilvoll modernisiert: 2-Zimmer-Dachgeschosswohnung**
  - **1,080 €**
  - **65 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **good**

- **Unterschleißheim — Helle 2-Zimmer-Altbauwohnung**
  - **1,145 €**
  - **68.09 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **good**

## Lower-priority expensive
### 1200–1300 cold
- **Unterschleißheim — Ludwig-Thoma-Straße 2A**
  - **1,280 €**
  - **60 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - has **Einbauküche**
  - **strong, but expensive tier**

- **Unterschleißheim — Sankt-Ulrich-Straße 17**
  - **1,270 €**
  - **69 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **strong, but expensive tier**

- **Ismaning — Erstbezug! Moderne 2-Zimmer-Wohnung**
  - **1,225 €**
  - **49 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **expensive tier**

- **Garching — Dachgeschossw


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 23.9s
Time: model 20.7s, overhead 2.0s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Turn: i 13.8k o 663 t 17 cache 460.8k/97% est $0.0447; p≈2.9ktok/11.5kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 472.4k; active 2.4k; cache 470.0k/100%; p≈2.7ktok; ctx 45.1%; usable 45.9%; observed turns 147; actual turns 148


Got it — updated thresholds:

- **target:** up to **1200 cold**
- **expensive / lower priority:** **1200–1300 cold**
- **too cheap / likely low-chance:** **under 900**
- still reject:
  - swaps
  - scammy furniture/kitchen payments
  - kitchen not included/free
  - obvious temporary/furnished-only fallback stuff unless necessary

With that filter, the shortlist becomes:

## Best current targets
### Under 1200 cold
- **Ismaning — Moderne 2-Zimmer-Wohnung mit sonnigem Balkon**
  - **1,120 €**
  - **52 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **good**

- **Ismaning — Dachgeschosswohnung in Toplage**
  - **1,050 €**
  - **56 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **good**

- **Garching — Stilvoll modernisiert: 2-Zimmer-Dachgeschosswohnung**
  - **1,080 €**
  - **65 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **good**

- **Unterschleißheim — Helle 2-Zimmer-Altbauwohnung**
  - **1,145 €**
  - **68.09 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **good**

## Lower-priority expensive
### 1200–1300 cold
- **Unterschleißheim — Ludwig-Thoma-Straße 2A**
  - **1,280 €**
  - **60 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - has **Einbauküche**
  - **strong, but expensive tier**

- **Unterschleißheim — Sankt-Ulrich-Straße 17**
  - **1,270 €**
  - **69 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **strong, but expensive tier**

- **Ismaning — Erstbezug! Moderne 2-Zimmer-Wohnung**
  - **1,225 €**
  - **49 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **expensive tier**

- **Garching — Dachgeschosswohnung mit sonniger Dachterrasse**
  - **1,240 €**
  - **59 m²**
  - **2 Zi.**
  - **expensive tier**

## Skip
- anything **under 900**
- all **swaps**
- furnished/time-limited stuff unless fallback
- Oberschleißheim **1,557 €** etc.

So if we prioritize effort, I’d start with:

1. **Ismaning 1120 / 52 m²**
2. **Ismaning 1050 / 56 m²**
3. **Garching 1080 / 65 m²**
4. **Unterschleißheim 1145 / 68 m²**

Then only if needed move to the 1200–1300 tier.

If you want, next I can help turn this into a **first-contact batch order**:
- must contact now
- contact if time
- ignore.


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 25.1s
Time: model 20.7s, overhead 4.3s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Turn: i 13.8k o 663 t 17 cache 460.8k/97% est $0.0447; p≈2.9ktok/11.5kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 475.3k; active 14.5k; cache 460.8k/97%; p≈2.9ktok; ctx 45.1%; usable 45.9%; observed turns 147; actual turns 148


Please check the posting date and competitiveness


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Ctx: direct ACP session 475.3k; active 14.5k; cache 460.8k/97%; p≈2.9ktok; ctx 45.3%; usable 46.2%; observed turns 148; actual turns 148


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.2s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Ctx: direct ACP session 475.3k; active 14.5k; cache 460.8k/97%; p≈2.9ktok; ctx 45.3%; usable 46.2%; observed turns 148; actual turns 148


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.2s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Ctx: direct ACP session 475.3k; active 14.5k; cache 460.8k/97%; p≈2.9ktok; ctx 45.3%; usable 46.2%; observed turns 148; actual turns 148


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 2.0s
Time: overhead 2.0s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Turn: p≈3.0ktok/11.9kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 475.3k; active 14.5k; cache 460.8k/97%; p≈2.9ktok; ctx 45.3%; usable 46.2%; observed turns 148; actual turns 148


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
I


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (1):
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / in_progress / call_eLM98QmFJoKoXXEa3ZXOrh5

Draft:
I’m drilling into the shortlisted ImmoScout candidates now to pull two things you asked for specifically: **posting recency** and **competitiveness / demand signals**.


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 64.5s
Time: model 61.6s, overhead 2.0s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Turn: p≈3.0ktok/11.9kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 475.3k; active 14.5k; cache 460.8k/97%; p≈2.9ktok; ctx 45.3%; usable 46.2%; observed turns 148; actual turns 149


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (1):
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_eLM98QmFJoKoXXEa3ZXOrh5

Draft:
I’m drilling into the shortlisted ImmoScout candidates now to pull two things you asked for specifically: **posting recency** and **competitiveness / demand signals**.


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (1):
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_eLM98QmFJoKoXXEa3ZXOrh5

Draft:
I’m drilling into the shortlisted ImmoScout candidates now to pull two things you asked for specifically: **posting recency** and **competitiveness / demand signals**.Yep — I checked what I could reliably pull from the real ImmoScout pages.

## First: what I could extract well
For the shortlisted listings, the best reliable competitiveness/recency signals available right on the search results are:

- **Neu** = newly posted
- **Noch XX h exklusiv für Suchen** = very fresh / still in the early exclusive window
- **Bald verfügbar** = not necessarily brand-new, but upcoming
- **Sehr guter Preis / Guter Preis / Ausgezeichneter Preis** = ImmoScout’s own price signal

## What I could *not* reliably extract yet
I **did not manage to reliably pull the exact published date or views/applicant counts** from the expose pages in this pass, because the automatic mapping from listing card → expose page was flaky in the browser run.

So: I have **good recency proxies**, but not the full Plus-style applicant/view counts yet.

---

# Best filtered shortlist with recency + competitiveness

## Strongest under your current target cap (≤1200 cold)

### Ismaning — Moderne 2-Zimmer-Wohnung mit sonnigem Balkon
- **1,120 € cold**
- **52 m²**
- **


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (1):
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_eLM98QmFJoKoXXEa3ZXOrh5

Draft:
I’m drilling into the shortlisted ImmoScout candidates now to pull two things you asked for specifically: **posting recency** and **competitiveness / demand signals**.Yep — I checked what I could reliably pull from the real ImmoScout pages.

## First: what I could extract well
For the shortlisted listings, the best reliable competitiveness/recency signals available right on the search results are:

- **Neu** = newly posted
- **Noch XX h exklusiv für Suchen** = very fresh / still in the early exclusive window
- **Bald verfügbar** = not necessarily brand-new, but upcoming
- **Sehr guter Preis / Guter Preis / Ausgezeichneter Preis** = ImmoScout’s own price signal

## What I could *not* reliably extract yet
I **did not manage to reliably pull the exact published date or views/applicant counts** from the expose pages in this pass, because the automatic mapping from listing card → expose page was flaky in the browser run.

So: I have **good recency proxies**, but not the full Plus-style applicant/view counts yet.

---

# Best filtered shortlist with recency + competitiveness

## Strongest under your current target cap (≤1200 cold)

### Ismaning — Moderne 2-Zimmer-Wohnung mit sonnigem Balkon
- **1,120 € cold**
- **52 m²**
- **2 Zi.**
- **Recency:** **Neu**
- **Competitiveness:** **Noch 39 h exklusiv**
- **Take:** strong candidate, very fresh, not suspiciously cheap

### Ismaning — Dachgeschosswohnung in Toplage in Ismaning
- **1,050 € cold**
- **56 m²**
- **2 Zi.**
- **Recency:** showed up in the current fresh batch
- **Competitiveness:** **Nur exklusiv**
- **Take:** good candidate, still in fresh/exclusive phase

### Garching — Stilvoll modernisiert: 2-Zimmer-Dachgeschosswohnung
- **1,080 € cold**
- **65 m²**
- **2 Zi.**
- **Recency:** **Bald verfügbar**
- **Competitiveness:** **Nur exklusiv**
- **Take:** probably good, but slightly less “hot off the press” than the Ismaning one

### Unterschleißheim — Helle 2-Zimmer-Altbauwohnung
- **1,145 € cold**


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (1):
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_eLM98QmFJoKoXXEa3ZXOrh5

Draft:
I’m drilling into the shortlisted ImmoScout candidates now to pull two things you asked for specifically: **posting recency** and **competitiveness / demand signals**.Yep — I checked what I could reliably pull from the real ImmoScout pages.

## First: what I could extract well
For the shortlisted listings, the best reliable competitiveness/recency signals available right on the search results are:

- **Neu** = newly posted
- **Noch XX h exklusiv für Suchen** = very fresh / still in the early exclusive window
- **Bald verfügbar** = not necessarily brand-new, but upcoming
- **Sehr guter Preis / Guter Preis / Ausgezeichneter Preis** = ImmoScout’s own price signal

## What I could *not* reliably extract yet
I **did not manage to reliably pull the exact published date or views/applicant counts** from the expose pages in this pass, because the automatic mapping from listing card → expose page was flaky in the browser run.

So: I have **good recency proxies**, but not the full Plus-style applicant/view counts yet.

---

# Best filtered shortlist with recency + competitiveness

## Strongest under your current target cap (≤1200 cold)

### Ismaning — Moderne 2-Zimmer-Wohnung mit sonnigem Balkon
- **1,120 € cold**
- **52 m²**
- **2 Zi.**
- **Recency:** **Neu**
- **Competitiveness:** **Noch 39 h exklusiv**
- **Take:** strong candidate, very fresh, not suspiciously cheap

### Ismaning — Dachgeschosswohnung in Toplage in Ismaning
- **1,050 € cold**
- **56 m²**
- **2 Zi.**
- **Recency:** showed up in the current fresh batch
- **Competitiveness:** **Nur exklusiv**
- **Take:** good candidate, still in fresh/exclusive phase

### Garching — Stilvoll modernisiert: 2-Zimmer-Dachgeschosswohnung
- **1,080 € cold**
- **65 m²**
- **2 Zi.**
- **Recency:** **Bald verfügbar**
- **Competitiveness:** **Nur exklusiv**
- **Take:** probably good, but slightly less “hot off the press” than the Ismaning one

### Unterschleißheim — Helle 2-Zimmer-Altbauwohnung
- **1,145 € cold**
- **68.09 m²**
- **2 Zi.**
- **Recency:** visible in the current active set
- **Competitiveness:** **Sehr guter Preis**
- **Take:** decent candidate, not ultra-fresh-looking, but still good enough to inspect

---

# Lower-priority “expensive” tier (1200–1300 cold)

### Unterschleißheim — Moderne 2-Zimmerwohnung mit Balkon und Einbauküche
- **1,280 € cold**
- **60 m²**
- **2 Zi.**
- **Recency:** **Neu**
- **Competitiveness:** **Noch 69 h exklusiv**
- **Take:** honestly one of the best-looking listings overall, just pushed down by price cap

### Unterschleißheim — Gepflegte 2-Zimmer Dachgeschosswohnung
- **1,270 € cold**
- **69 m²**
- **2 Zi.**
- **Recency:** in current live set
- **Competitiveness:** **Sehr guter Preis**
- **Take:** also strong


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (1):
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_eLM98QmFJoKoXXEa3ZXOrh5

Draft:
I’m drilling into the shortlisted ImmoScout candidates now to pull two things you asked for specifically: **posting recency** and **competitiveness / demand signals**.Yep — I checked what I could reliably pull from the real ImmoScout pages.

## First: what I could extract well
For the shortlisted listings, the best reliable competitiveness/recency signals available right on the search results are:

- **Neu** = newly posted
- **Noch XX h exklusiv für Suchen** = very fresh / still in the early exclusive window
- **Bald verfügbar** = not necessarily brand-new, but upcoming
- **Sehr guter Preis / Guter Preis / Ausgezeichneter Preis** = ImmoScout’s own price signal

## What I could *not* reliably extract yet
I **did not manage to reliably pull the exact published date or views/applicant counts** from the expose pages in this pass, because the automatic mapping from listing card → expose page was flaky in the browser run.

So: I have **good recency proxies**, but not the full Plus-style applicant/view counts yet.

---

# Best filtered shortlist with recency + competitiveness

## Strongest under your current target cap (≤1200 cold)

### Ismaning — Moderne 2-Zimmer-Wohnung mit sonnigem Balkon
- **1,120 € cold**
- **52 m²**
- **2 Zi.**
- **Recency:** **Neu**
- **Competitiveness:** **Noch 39 h exklusiv**
- **Take:** strong candidate, very fresh, not suspiciously cheap

### Ismaning — Dachgeschosswohnung in Toplage in Ismaning
- **1,050 € cold**
- **56 m²**
- **2 Zi.**
- **Recency:** showed up in the current fresh batch
- **Competitiveness:** **Nur exklusiv**
- **Take:** good candidate, still in fresh/exclusive phase

### Garching — Stilvoll modernisiert: 2-Zimmer-Dachgeschosswohnung
- **1,080 € cold**
- **65 m²**
- **2 Zi.**
- **Recency:** **Bald verfügbar**
- **Competitiveness:** **Nur exklusiv**
- **Take:** probably good, but slightly less “hot off the press” than the Ismaning one

### Unterschleißheim — Helle 2-Zimmer-Altbauwohnung
- **1,145 € cold**
- **68.09 m²**
- **2 Zi.**
- **Recency:** visible in the current active set
- **Competitiveness:** **Sehr guter Preis**
- **Take:** decent candidate, not ultra-fresh-looking, but still good enough to inspect

---

# Lower-priority “expensive” tier (1200–1300 cold)

### Unterschleißheim — Moderne 2-Zimmerwohnung mit Balkon und Einbauküche
- **1,280 € cold**
- **60 m²**
- **2 Zi.**
- **Recency:** **Neu**
- **Competitiveness:** **Noch 69 h exklusiv**
- **Take:** honestly one of the best-looking listings overall, just pushed down by price cap

### Unterschleißheim — Gepflegte 2-Zimmer Dachgeschosswohnung
- **1,270 € cold**
- **69 m²**
- **2 Zi.**
- **Recency:** in current live set
- **Competitiveness:** **Sehr guter Preis**
- **Take:** also strong, but expensive tier

### Garching — Stilvolle 2-Zimmer-Dachgeschosswohnung mit sonniger Dachterrasse
- **1,240 € cold**
- **59 m²**
- **2 Zi.**
- **Recency:** active
- **Competitiveness:** no strong explicit marker beyond current listing presence
- **Take:** plausible expensive-tier candidate

### Ismaning — Erstbezug! Moderne 2-Zimmer-Wohnung
- **1,225 € cold**
- **49 m²**
- **2 Zi.**
- **Recency:** **Neu / Erstbezug**
- **Competitiveness:** **Guter Preis**
- **Take:** good but expensive tier, and a bit smaller

---

# Cheap / likely too competitive → skip
Under your new floor:
- anything **under 900 cold** → skip
- the **950 € Unterschleißheim Lohhof** one is close enough to “cheap/high-competition” that I’d also deprioritize unless the higher tier fails badly


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (1):
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_eLM98QmFJoKoXXEa3ZXOrh5

Draft:
I’m drilling into the shortlisted ImmoScout candidates now to pull two things you asked for specifically: **posting recency** and **competitiveness / demand signals**.Yep — I checked what I could reliably pull from the real ImmoScout pages.

## First: what I could extract well
For the shortlisted listings, the best reliable competitiveness/recency signals available right on the search results are:

- **Neu** = newly posted
- **Noch XX h exklusiv für Suchen** = very fresh / still in the early exclusive window
- **Bald verfügbar** = not necessarily brand-new, but upcoming
- **Sehr guter Preis / Guter Preis / Ausgezeichneter Preis** = ImmoScout’s own price signal

## What I could *not* reliably extract yet
I **did not manage to reliably pull the exact published date or views/applicant counts** from the expose pages in this pass, because the automatic mapping from listing card → expose page was flaky in the browser run.

So: I have **good recency proxies**, but not the full Plus-style applicant/view counts yet.

---

# Best filtered shortlist with recency + competitiveness

## Strongest under your current target cap (≤1200 cold)

### Ismaning — Moderne 2-Zimmer-Wohnung mit sonnigem Balkon
- **1,120 € cold**
- **52 m²**
- **2 Zi.**
- **Recency:** **Neu**
- **Competitiveness:** **Noch 39 h exklusiv**
- **Take:** strong candidate, very fresh, not suspiciously cheap

### Ismaning — Dachgeschosswohnung in Toplage in Ismaning
- **1,050 € cold**
- **56 m²**
- **2 Zi.**
- **Recency:** showed up in the current fresh batch
- **Competitiveness:** **Nur exklusiv**
- **Take:** good candidate, still in fresh/exclusive phase

### Garching — Stilvoll modernisiert: 2-Zimmer-Dachgeschosswohnung
- **1,080 € cold**
- **65 m²**
- **2 Zi.**
- **Recency:** **Bald verfügbar**
- **Competitiveness:** **Nur exklusiv**
- **Take:** probably good, but slightly less “hot off the press” than the Ismaning one

### Unterschleißheim — Helle 2-Zimmer-Altbauwohnung
- **1,145 € cold**
- **68.09 m²**
- **2 Zi.**
- **Recency:** visible in the current active set
- **Competitiveness:** **Sehr guter Preis**
- **Take:** decent candidate, not ultra-fresh-looking, but still good enough to inspect

---

# Lower-priority “expensive” tier (1200–1300 cold)

### Unterschleißheim — Moderne 2-Zimmerwohnung mit Balkon und Einbauküche
- **1,280 € cold**
- **60 m²**
- **2 Zi.**
- **Recency:** **Neu**
- **Competitiveness:** **Noch 69 h exklusiv**
- **Take:** honestly one of the best-looking listings overall, just pushed down by price cap

### Unterschleißheim — Gepflegte 2-Zimmer Dachgeschosswohnung
- **1,270 € cold**
- **69 m²**
- **2 Zi.**
- **Recency:** in current live set
- **Competitiveness:** **Sehr guter Preis**
- **Take:** also strong, but expensive tier

### Garching — Stilvolle 2-Zimmer-Dachgeschosswohnung mit sonniger Dachterrasse
- **1,240 € cold**
- **59 m²**
- **2 Zi.**
- **Recency:** active
- **Competitiveness:** no strong explicit marker beyond current listing presence
- **Take:** plausible expensive-tier candidate

### Ismaning — Erstbezug! Moderne 2-Zimmer-Wohnung
- **1,225 € cold**
- **49 m²**
- **2 Zi.**
- **Recency:** **Neu / Erstbezug**
- **Competitiveness:** **Guter Preis**
- **Take:** good but expensive tier, and a bit smaller

---

# Cheap / likely too competitive → skip
Under your new floor:
- anything **under 900 cold** → skip
- the **950 € Unterschleißheim Lohhof** one is close enough to “cheap/high-competition” that I’d also deprioritize unless the higher tier fails badly
- swaps still skip

---

# My practical recommendation
If we optimize for:
- real chance
- recency
- not too cheap
- not too expensive

Then the first-contact order should probably be:

## Contact first
1. **I


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 127.4s
Time: model 124.5s, overhead 2.0s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Turn: p≈3.0ktok/11.9kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 475.3k; active 14.5k; cache 460.8k/97%; p≈2.9ktok; ctx 45.3%; usable 46.2%; observed turns 148; actual turns 149


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 130.3s
Time: model 127.4s, overhead 2.0s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Turn: i 8.5k o 1.2k t 58 cache 443.4k/98% est $0.0408; p≈3.0ktok/11.9kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 475.3k; active 14.5k; cache 460.8k/97%; p≈2.9ktok; ctx 45.3%; usable 46.2%; observed turns 148; actual turns 149


I’m drilling into the shortlisted ImmoScout candidates now to pull two things you asked for specifically: **posting recency** and **competitiveness / demand signals**.Yep — I checked what I could reliably pull from the real ImmoScout pages.

## First: what I could extract well
For the shortlisted listings, the best reliable competitiveness/recency signals available right on the search results are:

- **Neu** = newly posted
- **Noch XX h exklusiv für Suchen** = very fresh / still in the early exclusive window
- **Bald verfügbar** = not necessarily brand-new, but upcoming
- **Sehr guter Preis / Guter Preis / Ausgezeichneter Preis** = ImmoScout’s own price signal

## What I could *not* reliably extract yet
I **did not manage to reliably pull the exact published date or views/applicant counts** from the expose pages in this pass, because the automatic mapping from listing card → expose page was flaky in the browser run.

So: I have **good recency proxies**, but not the full Plus-style applicant/view counts yet.

---

# Best filtered shortlist with recency + competitiveness

## Strongest under your current target cap (≤1200 cold)

### Ismaning — Moderne 2-Zimmer-Wohnung mit sonnigem Balkon
- **1,120 € cold**
- **52 m²**
- **2 Zi.**
- **Recency:** **Neu**
- **Competitiveness:** **Noch 39 h exklusiv**
- **Take:** strong candidate, very fresh, not suspiciously cheap

### Ismaning — Dachgeschosswohnung in Toplage in Ismaning
- **1,050 € cold**
- **56 m²**
- **2 Zi.**
- **Recency:** showed up in the current fresh batch
- **Competitiveness:** **Nur exklusiv**
- **Take:** good candidate, still in fresh/exclusive phase

### Garching — Stilvoll modernisiert: 2-Zimmer-Dachgeschosswohnung
- **1,080 € cold**
- **65 m²**
- **2 Zi.**
- **Recency:** **Bald verfügbar**
- **Competitiveness:** **Nur exklusiv**
- **Take:** probably good, but slightly less “hot off the press” than the Ismaning one

### Unterschleißheim — Helle 2-Zimmer-Altbauwohnung
- **1,145 € cold**
- **68.09 m²**
- **2 Zi.**
- **Recency:** visible in the current active set
- **Competitiveness:** **Sehr guter Preis**
- **Take:** decent candidate, not ultra-fresh-looking, but still good enough to inspect

---

# Lower-priority “expensive” tier (1200–1300 cold)

### Unterschleißheim — Moderne 2-Zimmerwohnung mit Balkon und Einbauküche
- **1,280 € cold**
- **60 m²**
- **2 Zi.**
- **Recency:** **Neu**
- **Competitiveness:** **Noch 69 h exklusiv**
- **Take:** honestly one of the best-looking listings overall, just pushed down by price cap

### Unterschleißheim — Gepflegte 2-Zimmer Dachgeschosswohnung
- **1,270 € cold**
- **69 m²**
- **2 Zi.**
- **Recency:** in current live set
- **Competitiveness:** **Sehr guter Preis**
- **Take:** also strong, but expensive tier

### Garching — Stilvolle 2-Zimmer-Dachgeschosswohnung mit sonniger Dachterrasse
- **1,240 € cold**
- **59 m²**
- **2 Zi.**
- **Recency:** active
- **Competitiveness:** no strong explicit marker beyond current listing presence
- **Take:** plausible expensive-tier candidate

### Ismaning — Erstbezug! Moderne 2-Zimmer-Wohnung
- **1,225 € cold**
- **49 m²**
- **2 Zi.**
- **Recency:** **Neu / Erstbezug**
- **Competitiveness:** **Guter Preis**
- **Take:** good but expensive tier, and a bit smaller

---

# Cheap / likely too competitive → skip
Under your new floor:
- anything **under 900 cold** → skip
- the **950 € Unterschleißheim Lohhof** one is close enough to “cheap/high-competition” that I’d also deprioritize unless the higher tier fails badly
- swaps still skip

---

# My practical recommendation
If we optimize for:
- real chance
- recency
- not too cheap
- not too expensive

Then the first-contact order should probably be:

## Contact first
1. **Ismaning — 1,120 / 52 m² / Neu / Noch 39 h exklusiv**
2. **Ismaning — 1,050 / 56 m² / Nur exklusiv**
3. **Garching — 1,080 / 65 m² / Bald verfügbar / Nur exklusiv**
4. **Unterschleißheim


— 1,145 / 68 m² / Sehr guter Preis**

## Contact if needed / second wave
5. **Unterschleißheim — Ludwig-Thoma-Straße 2A — 1,280 / 60 m² / Neu / Noch 69 h exklusiv / Einbauküche**
6. **Unterschleißheim — Sankt-Ulrich-Straße 17 — 1,270 / 69 m²**
7. **Ismaning — Erstbezug 1,225 / 49 m²**
8. **Garching Dachterrasse — 1,240 / 59 m²**

## What I’d do next
On your next message, I can continue with the **real ImmoScout flow** and:
- open the **top 4**
- verify **kitchen included/free**
- check for **1-person preference / furniture scam / swap traps**
- and if they pass, prepare the first outreach batch.


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 131.6s
Time: model 127.4s, overhead 4.2s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Turn: i 8.5k o 1.2k t 58 cache 443.4k/98% est $0.0408; p≈3.0ktok/11.9kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 453.2k; active 9.8k; cache 443.4k/98%; p≈3.0ktok; ctx 45.3%; usable 46.2%; observed turns 148; actual turns 149


Ideally we want those applicant numbers and dates, I'm paying for this so we should try to use them


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Ctx: direct ACP session 453.2k; active 9.8k; cache 443.4k/98%; p≈3.0ktok; ctx 45.3%; usable 46.2%; observed turns 148; actual turns 149


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.1s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Ctx: direct ACP session 453.2k; active 9.8k; cache 443.4k/98%; p≈3.0ktok; ctx 45.3%; usable 46.2%; observed turns 148; actual turns 149


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.6s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Ctx: direct ACP session 453.2k; active 9.8k; cache 443.4k/98%; p≈3.0ktok; ctx 45.3%; usable 46.2%; observed turns 148; actual turns 149


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 2.4s
Time: overhead 2.4s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Turn: p≈3.0ktok/11.9kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 453.2k; active 9.8k; cache 443.4k/98%; p≈3.0ktok; ctx 45.3%; usable 46.2%; observed turns 148; actual turns 149


📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Waiting for first model/tool update…


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Yes


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (1):
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / in_progress / call_Ltdjw2DqetEBXPtFIEtiuea

Draft:
Yes — agreed. If you’re paying for Plus, we should try harder to get the **posting dates** and **applicant/interest signals** from the actual exposes, not just infer from the search page. I’m doing a more targeted pass now on the best candidates.


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 64.8s
Time: model 61.3s, overhead 2.4s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Turn: p≈3.0ktok/11.9kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 453.2k; active 9.8k; cache 443.4k/98%; p≈3.0ktok; ctx 45.3%; usable 46.2%; observed turns 148; actual turns 150


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (1):
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_Ltdjw2DqetEBXPtFIEtiuea

Draft:
Yes — agreed. If you’re paying for Plus, we should try harder to get the **posting dates** and **applicant/interest signals** from the actual exposes, not just infer from the search page. I’m doing a more targeted pass now on the best candidates.


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 127.3s
Time: model 123.8s, overhead 2.4s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Turn: p≈3.0ktok/11.9kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 453.2k; active 9.8k; cache 443.4k/98%; p≈3.0ktok; ctx 43.2%; usable 44.1%; observed turns 149; actual turns 150


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (1):
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_Ltdjw2DqetEBXPtFIEtiuea

Draft:
Yes — agreed. If you’re paying for Plus, we should try harder to get the **posting dates** and **applicant/interest signals** from the actual exposes, not just infer from the search page. I’m doing a more targeted pass now on the best candidates.Yes — I pushed further and got some real **dates / demand signals** out of a few of the exposes.

The good news:
- the **Plus insights do show real numbers**
- and when I could get to the right expose, they were quite informative

The annoying part:
- the automated extraction is still a bit brittle
- so for some listings I got full numbers, and for others only the search-page freshness signals

## Most useful confirmed cases

### 1. Ismaning — Moderne 2-Zimmer-Wohnung mit sonnigem Balkon
- **Cold rent:** **1,120 €**
- **Warm rent:** **1,270 €**
- **Size:** **52 m²**
- **Rooms:** **2**
-


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (1):
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_Ltdjw2DqetEBXPtFIEtiuea

Draft:
Yes — agreed. If you’re paying for Plus, we should try harder to get the **posting dates** and **applicant/interest signals** from the actual exposes, not just infer from the search page. I’m doing a more targeted pass now on the best candidates.Yes — I pushed further and got some real **dates / demand signals** out of a few of the exposes.

The good news:
- the **Plus insights do show real numbers**
- and when I could get to the right expose, they were quite informative

The annoying part:
- the automated extraction is still a bit brittle
- so for some listings I got full numbers, and for others only the search-page freshness signals

## Most useful confirmed cases

### 1. Ismaning — Moderne 2-Zimmer-Wohnung mit sonnigem Balkon
- **Cold rent:** **1,120 €**
- **Warm rent:** **1,270 €**
- **Size:** **52 m²**
- **Rooms:** **2**
- **Available from:** **1.10.2026**
- **Published:** **04.06.2026**
- **Views:** **558**
- **Saved:** **72**
- **Contacted:** **53**
- **Competition analysis:** **90 Plus / 51 Basic**
- **Kitchen:** yes
- **Furnished:** no
- **My take:** very fresh, but already quite competitive

### 2. Unterschleißheim — Moderne 2-Zimmerwohnung mit Balkon und Einbauküche
- **Cold rent:** **1,280 €**
- **Warm rent:** **1,460 €**
- **Size:** **60 m²**
- **Rooms:** **2**
- **Available from:** **1.7.2026**
- **Published:** **05.06.2026**
- **Views:** **67**
- **Saved:** **19**
- **Contacted:** **15**
- **Competition analysis:** **7 Plus / 0 Basic**
- **Kitchen:** yes
- **Furnished:** no
- **My take:** by far the **cleanest / least crowded** strong listing I saw — but it sits in your **expensive tier**

### 3. Unterschleißheim — Helle 2-Zimmer-Altbauwohnung
- **Cold rent:** **1,145 €**
- **Warm rent:** **1,


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (1):
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_Ltdjw2DqetEBXPtFIEtiuea

Draft:
Yes — agreed. If you’re paying for Plus, we should try harder to get the **posting dates** and **applicant/interest signals** from the actual exposes, not just infer from the search page. I’m doing a more targeted pass now on the best candidates.Yes — I pushed further and got some real **dates / demand signals** out of a few of the exposes.

The good news:
- the **Plus insights do show real numbers**
- and when I could get to the right expose, they were quite informative

The annoying part:
- the automated extraction is still a bit brittle
- so for some listings I got full numbers, and for others only the search-page freshness signals

## Most useful confirmed cases

### 1. Ismaning — Moderne 2-Zimmer-Wohnung mit sonnigem Balkon
- **Cold rent:** **1,120 €**
- **Warm rent:** **1,270 €**
- **Size:** **52 m²**
- **Rooms:** **2**
- **Available from:** **1.10.2026**
- **Published:** **04.06.2026**
- **Views:** **558**
- **Saved:** **72**
- **Contacted:** **53**
- **Competition analysis:** **90 Plus / 51 Basic**
- **Kitchen:** yes
- **Furnished:** no
- **My take:** very fresh, but already quite competitive

### 2. Unterschleißheim — Moderne 2-Zimmerwohnung mit Balkon und Einbauküche
- **Cold rent:** **1,280 €**
- **Warm rent:** **1,460 €**
- **Size:** **60 m²**
- **Rooms:** **2**
- **Available from:** **1.7.2026**
- **Published:** **05.06.2026**
- **Views:** **67**
- **Saved:** **19**
- **Contacted:** **15**
- **Competition analysis:** **7 Plus / 0 Basic**
- **Kitchen:** yes
- **Furnished:** no
- **My take:** by far the **cleanest / least crowded** strong listing I saw — but it sits in your **expensive tier**

### 3. Unterschleißheim — Helle 2-Zimmer-Altbauwohnung
- **Cold rent:** **1,145 €**
- **Warm rent:** **1,385 €**
- **Size:** **68.09 m²**
- **Rooms:** **2**
- **Available:** **ab sofort**
- **Published:** **28.04.2026**
- **Views:** **1997**
- **Saved:** **177**
- **Contacted:** **155**
- **Competition analysis:** **83 Plus / 69 Basic**
- **Kitchen:** yes
- **Furnished:** no
- **My take:** price/size are good, but this one is **old and very heavily competed**

## Partial cases

### 4. Ismaning — Dachgeschosswohnung in Toplage
- **Cold rent:** **1,050 €**
- **Warm rent:** **1,225 €**
- **Size:** **56 m²**
- **Rooms:** **2**
- **Kitchen:** yes
- **Pets:** nach Vereinbarung
- **Freshness signal:** **Bald verfügbar / Nur exklusiv**
- **Applicant numbers:** I did **not** get proper Plus metrics out of this one
- **My take:** still interesting, likely fresher / quieter than the old Unterschleißheim one

### 5. Garching — Stilvoll modernisiert: 2-Zimmer-Dachgeschosswohnung
- **Cold rent:** **1,080 €**
- **Warm rent:** **1,230 €**
- **Size:** **65 m²**
- **Rooms:** **2**
- **Available from:** **1.9.2026**
- **Kitchen:** **not explicitly visible** in what I pulled
- **Freshness signal:** **Neu / Bald verfügbar / Nur exklusiv**
- **Applicant numbers:** not reliably extracted
- **My take:** still decent, but later move-in and less confirmed detail

## What


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Tools (1):
- matrix_lite_extended_tools_extended_tool_call / completed / call_Ltdjw2DqetEBXPtFIEtiuea

Draft:
Yes — agreed. If you’re paying for Plus, we should try harder to get the **posting dates** and **applicant/interest signals** from the actual exposes, not just infer from the search page. I’m doing a more targeted pass now on the best candidates.Yes — I pushed further and got some real **dates / demand signals** out of a few of the exposes.

The good news:
- the **Plus insights do show real numbers**
- and when I could get to the right expose, they were quite informative

The annoying part:
- the automated extraction is still a bit brittle
- so for some listings I got full numbers, and for others only the search-page freshness signals

## Most useful confirmed cases

### 1. Ismaning — Moderne 2-Zimmer-Wohnung mit sonnigem Balkon
- **Cold rent:** **1,120 €**
- **Warm rent:** **1,270 €**
- **Size:** **52 m²**
- **Rooms:** **2**
- **Available from:** **1.10.2026**
- **Published:** **04.06.2026**
- **Views:** **558**
- **Saved:** **72**
- **Contacted:** **53**
- **Competition analysis:** **90 Plus / 51 Basic**
- **Kitchen:** yes
- **Furnished:** no
- **My take:** very fresh, but already quite competitive

### 2. Unterschleißheim — Moderne 2-Zimmerwohnung mit Balkon und Einbauküche
- **Cold rent:** **1,280 €**
- **Warm rent:** **1,460 €**
- **Size:** **60 m²**
- **Rooms:** **2**
- **Available from:** **1.7.2026**
- **Published:** **05.06.2026**
- **Views:** **67**
- **Saved:** **19**
- **Contacted:** **15**
- **Competition analysis:** **7 Plus / 0 Basic**
- **Kitchen:** yes
- **Furnished:** no
- **My take:** by far the **cleanest / least crowded** strong listing I saw — but it sits in your **expensive tier**

### 3. Unterschleißheim — Helle 2-Zimmer-Altbauwohnung
- **Cold rent:** **1,145 €**
- **Warm rent:** **1,385 €**
- **Size:** **68.09 m²**
- **Rooms:** **2**
- **Available:** **ab sofort**
- **Published:** **28.04.2026**
- **Views:** **1997**
- **Saved:** **177**
- **Contacted:** **155**
- **Competition analysis:** **83 Plus / 69 Basic**
- **Kitchen:** yes
- **Furnished:** no
- **My take:** price/size are good, but this one is **old and very heavily competed**

## Partial cases

### 4. Ismaning — Dachgeschosswohnung in Toplage
- **Cold rent:** **1,050 €**
- **Warm rent:** **1,225 €**
- **Size:** **56 m²**
- **Rooms:** **2**
- **Kitchen:** yes
- **Pets:** nach Vereinbarung
- **Freshness signal:** **Bald verfügbar / Nur exklusiv**
- **Applicant numbers:** I did **not** get proper Plus metrics out of this one
- **My take:** still interesting, likely fresher / quieter than the old Unterschleißheim one

### 5. Garching — Stilvoll modernisiert: 2-Zimmer-Dachgeschosswohnung
- **Cold rent:** **1,080 €**
- **Warm rent:** **1,230 €**
- **Size:** **65 m²**
- **Rooms:** **2**
- **Available from:** **1.9.2026**
- **Kitchen:** **not explicitly visible** in what I pulled
- **Freshness signal:** **Neu / Bald verfügbar / Nur exklusiv**
- **Applicant numbers:** not reliably extracted
- **My take:** still decent, but later move-in and less confirmed detail

## What this means for actual priority

### Best balance of price + freshness + chance
1. **Ismaning 1,120 / 52 m²**
   - fresh
   - not too expensive
   - but already attracting attention

2. **Ismaning 1,050 / 56 m²**
   - good price
   - still in an exclusive / early state
   - fewer hard numbers, but promising

3. **Garching 1,080 / 65 m²**
   - decent price and size
   - likely still early
   - but later availability

### Best objective listing, but expensive tier
4. **Unterschleißheim Ludwig-Thoma 1,280 / 60 m²**
   - strongest low-competition signal
   - kitchen included
   - good timing
   - but above your preferred 1200 cold cap

### Looks good on paper, but likely already overrun
5. **Unterschleißheim A


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 145.7s
Time: model 142.2s, overhead 2.4s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Turn: i 11.1k o 1.2k t 516 cache 455.2k/98% est $0.0541; p≈3.0ktok/11.9kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 453.2k; active 9.8k; cache 443.4k/98%; p≈3.0ktok; ctx 43.2%; usable 44.1%; observed turns 149; actual turns 150


Yes — agreed. If you’re paying for Plus, we should try harder to get the **posting dates** and **applicant/interest signals** from the actual exposes, not just infer from the search page. I’m doing a more targeted pass now on the best candidates.Yes — I pushed further and got some real **dates / demand signals** out of a few of the exposes.

The good news:
- the **Plus insights do show real numbers**
- and when I could get to the right expose, they were quite informative

The annoying part:
- the automated extraction is still a bit brittle
- so for some listings I got full numbers, and for others only the search-page freshness signals

## Most useful confirmed cases

### 1. Ismaning — Moderne 2-Zimmer-Wohnung mit sonnigem Balkon
- **Cold rent:** **1,120 €**
- **Warm rent:** **1,270 €**
- **Size:** **52 m²**
- **Rooms:** **2**
- **Available from:** **1.10.2026**
- **Published:** **04.06.2026**
- **Views:** **558**
- **Saved:** **72**
- **Contacted:** **53**
- **Competition analysis:** **90 Plus / 51 Basic**
- **Kitchen:** yes
- **Furnished:** no
- **My take:** very fresh, but already quite competitive

### 2. Unterschleißheim — Moderne 2-Zimmerwohnung mit Balkon und Einbauküche
- **Cold rent:** **1,280 €**
- **Warm rent:** **1,460 €**
- **Size:** **60 m²**
- **Rooms:** **2**
- **Available from:** **1.7.2026**
- **Published:** **05.06.2026**
- **Views:** **67**
- **Saved:** **19**
- **Contacted:** **15**
- **Competition analysis:** **7 Plus / 0 Basic**
- **Kitchen:** yes
- **Furnished:** no
- **My take:** by far the **cleanest / least crowded** strong listing I saw — but it sits in your **expensive tier**

### 3. Unterschleißheim — Helle 2-Zimmer-Altbauwohnung
- **Cold rent:** **1,145 €**
- **Warm rent:** **1,385 €**
- **Size:** **68.09 m²**
- **Rooms:** **2**
- **Available:** **ab sofort**
- **Published:** **28.04.2026**
- **Views:** **1997**
- **Saved:** **177**
- **Contacted:** **155**
- **Competition analysis:** **83 Plus / 69 Basic**
- **Kitchen:** yes
- **Furnished:** no
- **My take:** price/size are good, but this one is **old and very heavily competed**

## Partial cases

### 4. Ismaning — Dachgeschosswohnung in Toplage
- **Cold rent:** **1,050 €**
- **Warm rent:** **1,225 €**
- **Size:** **56 m²**
- **Rooms:** **2**
- **Kitchen:** yes
- **Pets:** nach Vereinbarung
- **Freshness signal:** **Bald verfügbar / Nur exklusiv**
- **Applicant numbers:** I did **not** get proper Plus metrics out of this one
- **My take:** still interesting, likely fresher / quieter than the old Unterschleißheim one

### 5. Garching — Stilvoll modernisiert: 2-Zimmer-Dachgeschosswohnung
- **Cold rent:** **1,080 €**
- **Warm rent:** **1,230 €**
- **Size:** **65 m²**
- **Rooms:** **2**
- **Available from:** **1.9.2026**
- **Kitchen:** **not explicitly visible** in what I pulled
- **Freshness signal:** **Neu / Bald verfügbar / Nur exklusiv**
- **Applicant numbers:** not reliably extracted
- **My take:** still decent, but later move-in and less confirmed detail

## What this means for actual priority

### Best balance of price + freshness + chance
1. **Ismaning 1,120 / 52 m²**
   - fresh
   - not too expensive
   - but already attracting attention

2. **Ismaning 1,050 / 56 m²**
   - good price
   - still in an exclusive / early state
   - fewer hard numbers, but promising

3. **Garching 1,080 / 65 m²**
   - decent price and size
   - likely still early
   - but later availability

### Best objective listing, but expensive tier
4. **Unterschleißheim Ludwig-Thoma 1,280 / 60 m²**
   - strongest low-competition signal
   - kitchen included
   - good timing
   - but above your preferred 1200 cold cap

### Looks good on paper, but likely already overrun
5. **Unterschleißheim Altbau 1,145 / 68 m²**
   - price/size nice
   - but **1997 views / 155 contacts**
   - that’s brutal competition

## My honest recommendation
If your goal is **viewings soon**, I would n


ot prioritize purely by rent anymore. I’d split it like:

### Contact first
- **Ismaning 1,120**
- **Ismaning 1,050**
- **Garching 1,080**

### Contact if you’re willing to stretch to “expensive”
- **Unterschleißheim Ludwig-Thoma 1,280**
  - because the competition numbers are so much healthier

### Probably not worth first-wave effort
- **Unterschleißheim Altbau 1,145**
  - too old and too swarmed

If you want, next I can help with the practical next move:
- choose the **first 3 or 4**
- open only those
- verify kitchen / no scam handover / no 1-person restriction
- and draft the actual first-contact batch.


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 146.8s
Time: model 142.2s, overhead 4.6s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Turn: i 11.1k o 1.2k t 516 cache 455.2k/98% est $0.0541; p≈3.0ktok/11.9kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 468.0k; active 12.8k; cache 455.2k/98%; p≈3.0ktok; ctx 43.2%; usable 44.1%; observed turns 149; actual turns 150


No frau Kilic please. Also October is too late, I want it from July or earlier


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Ctx: direct ACP session 468.0k; active 12.8k; cache 455.2k/98%; p≈3.0ktok; ctx 43.2%; usable 44.1%; observed turns 149; actual turns 150


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.1s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Ctx: direct ACP session 468.0k; active 12.8k; cache 455.2k/98%; p≈3.0ktok; ctx 43.2%; usable 44.1%; observed turns 149; actual turns 150


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.1s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Ctx: direct ACP session 468.0k; active 12.8k; cache 455.2k/98%; p≈3.0ktok; ctx 43.2%; usable 44.1%; observed turns 149; actual turns 150


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 2.0s
Time: overhead 2.0s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Turn: p≈2.9ktok/11.8kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 468.0k; active 12.8k; cache 455.2k/98%; p≈3.0ktok; ctx 43.2%; usable 44.1%; observed turns 149; actual turns 150


📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Waiting for first model/tool update…


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Got


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Got it.

Updated hard filters:
- **exclude Frau Kiliç**
- **move-in must be July 2026 or earlier**
- October is out

That removes at least:
- **Ismaning — Moderne 2-Zimmer-Wohnung mit sonnigem Balkon** → **1.10.2026**, so **out**
- **Garching — Stilvoll modernisiert: 2-Zimmer-Dachgeschosswohnung** → **1.9.2026**, so **out**

From the ones we already checked, the still-viable ones are basically:

- **Unterschleißheim — Helle 2-Zimmer-Altbauwohnung**
  - **1,145 € cold**
  - **1,385 € warm**
  - **68.09 m²**
  - **ab sofort**
  - high competition, but timing fits

- **Unterschleißheim — Moderne 2-Zimmerwohnung mit Balkon und Einbauküche**
  - **1,280 € cold**
  - **1,460 € warm**
  - **60 m²**
  - **1.7.2026**
  - only if this is **not** the Frau Kiliç one and if you accept the “expensive” tier

Everything else I mentioned earlier is now either:
- too late
- too expensive
- too cheap
- swap/fallback junk
- or should be excluded by your new constraint

So yes — this narrows


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Got it.

Updated hard filters:
- **exclude Frau Kiliç**
- **move-in must be July 2026 or earlier**
- October is out

That removes at least:
- **Ismaning — Moderne 2-Zimmer-Wohnung mit sonnigem Balkon** → **1.10.2026**, so **out**
- **Garching — Stilvoll modernisiert: 2-Zimmer-Dachgeschosswohnung** → **1.9.2026**, so **out**

From the ones we already checked, the still-viable ones are basically:

- **Unterschleißheim — Helle 2-Zimmer-Altbauwohnung**
  - **1,145 € cold**
  - **1,385 € warm**
  - **68.09 m²**
  - **ab sofort**
  - high competition, but timing fits

- **Unterschleißheim — Moderne 2-Zimmerwohnung mit Balkon und Einbauküche**
  - **1,280 € cold**
  - **1,460 € warm**
  - **60 m²**
  - **1.7.2026**
  - only if this is **not** the Frau Kiliç one and if you accept the “expensive” tier

Everything else I mentioned earlier is now either:
- too late
- too expensive
- too cheap
- swap/fallback junk
- or should be excluded by your new constraint

So yes — this narrows the field a lot.

Next step when you want:
- I can continue with **only July-or-earlier** and **not Frau Kiliç**
- and try to pull a few more proper candidates from the real ImmoScout search.


* 🟡 Processing result
Stage: model returned
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 26.9s
Time: model 23.9s, overhead 2.0s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Turn: i 14.7k o 360 t 343 cache 455.2k/97% est $0.0473; p≈2.9ktok/11.8kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 468.0k; active 12.8k; cache 455.2k/98%; p≈3.0ktok; ctx 44.6%; usable 45.5%; observed turns 150; actual turns 151


Got it.

Updated hard filters:
- **exclude Frau Kiliç**
- **move-in must be July 2026 or earlier**
- October is out

That removes at least:
- **Ismaning — Moderne 2-Zimmer-Wohnung mit sonnigem Balkon** → **1.10.2026**, so **out**
- **Garching — Stilvoll modernisiert: 2-Zimmer-Dachgeschosswohnung** → **1.9.2026**, so **out**

From the ones we already checked, the still-viable ones are basically:

- **Unterschleißheim — Helle 2-Zimmer-Altbauwohnung**
  - **1,145 € cold**
  - **1,385 € warm**
  - **68.09 m²**
  - **ab sofort**
  - high competition, but timing fits

- **Unterschleißheim — Moderne 2-Zimmerwohnung mit Balkon und Einbauküche**
  - **1,280 € cold**
  - **1,460 € warm**
  - **60 m²**
  - **1.7.2026**
  - only if this is **not** the Frau Kiliç one and if you accept the “expensive” tier

Everything else I mentioned earlier is now either:
- too late
- too expensive
- too cheap
- swap/fallback junk
- or should be excluded by your new constraint

So yes — this narrows the field a lot.

Next step when you want:
- I can continue with **only July-or-earlier** and **not Frau Kiliç**
- and try to pull a few more proper candidates from the real ImmoScout search.


* 🟢 Done
Stage: final reply sent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 27.7s
Time: model 23.9s, overhead 3.8s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Turn: i 14.7k o 360 t 343 cache 455.2k/97% est $0.0473; p≈2.9ktok/11.8kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 470.6k; active 15.4k; cache 455.2k/97%; p≈2.9ktok; ctx 44.6%; usable 45.5%; observed turns 150; actual turns 151


Is this really it? I thought there will be more


⚪ Received
Stage: queued for agent
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Ctx: direct ACP session 470.6k; active 15.4k; cache 455.2k/97%; p≈2.9ktok; ctx 44.9%; usable 45.8%; observed turns 151; actual turns 151


* ⚪ Queued
Stage: waiting for conversation turn
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 0.1s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Ctx: direct ACP session 470.6k; active 15.4k; cache 455.2k/97%; p≈2.9ktok; ctx 44.9%; usable 45.8%; observed turns 151; actual turns 151


* 🟡 Working
Stage: building prompt
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 1.2s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Ctx: direct ACP session 470.6k; active 15.4k; cache 455.2k/97%; p≈2.9ktok; ctx 44.9%; usable 45.8%; observed turns 151; actual turns 151


* 🟡 Working
Stage: model running
Model: openai/gpt-5.4
Elapsed: 2.3s
Time: overhead 2.3s
Backend: ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM; Label: persistent-chat-20260529T204325Z
Turn: p≈2.9ktok/11.5kch
Ctx: direct ACP session 470.6k; active 15.4k; cache 455.2k/97%; p≈2.9ktok; ctx 44.9%; usable 45.8%; observed turns 151; actual turns 151


* 📝 Live progress
This is streamed draft/tool progress, not hidden reasoning.
Draft:
Probably