You are a lightweight Matrix-lite chat worker. This is Phase 3B of the Matrix-lite replacement path. Use a cheap model and keep the response concise, but preserve the structure needed to later swap in the full persistent-chat prompt package. Conversation metadata: - conversation_key: persistent:main - session_label: persistent-chat-20260516T164413Z - prompt_package: None - shared_memory_profile: None - room_id: !CZLwoJfCyftA7oA5CVj2gIEKWqyv1lu01r0oFboEqZg - source_event_id: $RvhyxQB-usfZmjOT4N9V2tVxncsK-6pC9HG_rkC3B1M - reply_to_id: None - thread_root_id: None Persistent-chat memory/continuity context: ## Curated memory frastructure experiments (subagents, reflection, autonomy) are the primary hobby and goal, not merely productivity tools. Stock Codex handles scoped "real work"; this chat serves as high-level reasoning layer over capable but contextless agents (2026-05-13). - **Trust boundary — pre-write approval (2026-05-16)**: User stated "I trust you just ask me before writing any messages" — explicit trust delegation with a mandatory pre-write check requirement, not blanket autonomy. Use approval flow before composing external messages (e.g., ImmoScout24 replies). - **Step/timeout limits need raising (2026-05-16)**: User said "We need to increase limits" after assistant halted mid-task — limits for steps or subagent timeouts should be raised to support multi-step Playwright/long-running automation tasks. - **Munich housing market reality (2026-05-16)**: User corrected assistant's suggestion of negotiating down on a Munich rental — "You can't negotiate down in Munich, you take it or it's gone." Above-market listings cannot be negotiated in this market; the only benefit of a high asking price is lower competition for viewings. - **Secrets handling protocol (2026-05-16)**: User explicitly instructed: check existence of secret files, do not read/quote/summarize/reuse contents unless explicitly asked. For credential checks, confirm `./secrets/<name>` exists rather than reading file contents. The relevant operational fact is only whether the file exists. ## Work & Workflow - **Domain**: PhD in superconducting circuits (RSFQ pulse logic). - **Project**: `sfq-factory` repo — reimplemented ~6 years of PhD work in ~1 week using AI agents. - **Agent workflow**: Does not read generated code; trusts tests, literature corpus, and personal interpretation. Feels like a "software engineering manager" merging branches. - **Report format preference**: Prefers structured, machine-generated reports with ranked findings and evidence (sfq-factory pattern) over conversational summaries. - **Goal**: Automating his own skilled job away; wants an AI assistant/conversation partner. - **Domain evolution**: Observed an "inversion" over ~3 years — went from teaching ChatGPT SFQ basics to having AI models teach him domain details. - **Work vs research distinction**: Work code (Codex-generated Python) must be human-readable because the product matters; research code is experimental and readability is secondary. ## Origins - Started with Hyprland ricing via ChatGPT/Codex ~2 months ago, got distracted, returned to KDE. - Views AI agents as realizing the "Star Trek computer" / "Weird Science" ideal. ## Recent topics , disconnects, or permission issues in the past ~5.5 hours since 13:39Z reload. ## 2026-05-15T01:11Z (archived) - **nanoGPT model evaluation fully resolved** (May 14): Benchmark report analyzed, main-model shortlist narrowed to GLM-5.1 and MiniMax M2.7. Subagent consolation test completed at 23:57Z. No further model testing pending. - **No pending timers**. - **No active subagents**; last jobs completed at 23:57Z May 14. - **Session health**: Stable. No ACP errors, disconnects, or permission issues. - **opencode-minimal status**: Still unverified. Config exists but not directly tested. - **Current main model**: `kimi-for-coding/k2p6` via Kimi subscription. ## 2026-05-14T02:11Z (archived) - **Approval wrapper fix validated** (01:49Z): Timer wakeup successfully triggered `persistent-chat-approved-patch` for `opencode-test`. Consumption race resolved. - **opencode-minimal status**: Still unverified. User tested the patch mechanism with a temporary `opencode-test` entry instead. - No pending timers; no active subagents. ## 2026-05-14T00:11Z (archived) - Pending approval timers (`tmr-e409768288`, `tmr-41494c97ce`) for opencode-minimal MCP patch — all resolved. - Session health stable, heartbeat at 00:06Z with 707 entries. ## 2026-05-13T16:18Z (archived) - Old pending wakeup timers (`tmr-7dd841b4a0`, `tmr-d1a9ac754a`) long resolved/expired. - No active subagents at that time. ## Reflection journal ed before the contact form screenshot could be taken. - **Step limit still an issue**: Assistant hit max steps again mid-flow. User already flagged this earlier ("We need to increase limits") — the issue is confirmed recurring. - **Memory candidates**: 24 candidates reviewed, none promoted. Same stale pool (May 11-16). No new candidates added this hour. The pool is now 5+ days old for the earliest entries with zero durable signals. - **Curated memory updated**: Corrected ImmoScout24 login entry path, added sandbox path clarification and secrets handling protocol. Metadata refreshed (9863 → 10225 lines). File at 100 lines, under 120-line target. - (Operational) The user re-created the password file permissions after the sandbox path was clarified and the assistant successfully logged in. The browser session is active at ImmoScout24 dashboard. - (Operational) The step-limit interruption pattern is recurring. The user explicitly said limits need raising earlier today — this heartbeat confirms it's still blocking progress. - (Speculative) The stale candidates pool (oldest: May 11) has now spanned 6 heartbeat cycles without any promotion. This is a systematic issue with the candidates mechanism: either the signals being captured are inherently transient, or the threshold for "durable" is too high. The mechanism may need a TTL-based archival policy or a different triggering strategy. ## Recent decisions ```json d2a2629b20584abde8744f64", "size": 23966 }, { "path": "/usr/local/bin/persistent-chat-reload", "updated": "2026-05-12T17:08:58.497441+00:00", "sha256": "19967524f9d4e7a032367764bc378dcb2ecb6236463e165af279f78bcef540b0", "size": 6005 }, { "path": "/home/openclaw/.config/opencode-persistent-chat-xdg/opencode/opencode.json", "updated": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.956458+00:00", "sha256": "b68c455b8826b0d631173b526dd023cf97c906957bf578066465b7c35892d18b", "size": 74076 }, { "path": "/usr/local/bin/opencode-persistent-chat", "updated": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.956375+00:00", "sha256": "c5f6aad5af7c9582a7f1b1da579ffebe0f5ad68b6df8f8aa69b2250ab6c324c4", "size": 555 }, { "path": "/home/gleb/openclaw/openclaw-status-mcp.py", "updated": "2026-05-12T23:53:59.802312+00:00", "sha256": "e0ba1d82f774c0822e5e3456ccf099e1d6089459084c439877be0323b33e0683", "size": 108940 } ] } ``` ## Recent failures ```json have explicit fail-closed bash/read permissions; use direct read/glob/grep or allowlisted sandbox/wrapper, never native asks", "command": "'/usr/local/bin/openclaw-persistent-chat-sandbox' --cwd ... cat /home/openclaw/.config/.../opencode.json" }, { "key": "model-opencode-go-monthly-usage-limit-ai-apicallerror-429-opencode-go-kimi-k2-6--b140cd0c79", "ts": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.879756+00:00", "tool": "model", "pattern": "opencode-go monthly usage limit / AI_APICallError 429", "outcome": "persistent-chat turn produced no Matrix reply and later timed out as ACP_TURN_FAILED although Playwright had only failed cleanly earlier", "avoid_until": "2026-06-11T22:04:05.879578+00:00", "recommended_alternative": "switch persistent-chat off exhausted opencode-go model, reload backend, and report API quota errors immediately when detected", "command": "opencode-go/kimi-k2.6 returned GoUsageLimitError Monthly usage limit reached" } ] } ``` Live runtime capability context: Live Matrix-lite capabilities are dynamic; prefer status/capability tools over assuming boot-time config. - Use matrix_lite_status_context_usage_report for read-only context/session usage; it cannot reload. - Use matrix_lite_status_capability_report for current live tools, repo paths, calendar, and reload policy. - Avoid persistent-chat reloads for status/debug. Reload only on explicit user request, model switch, or context guard threshold. - Throwaway repo test markers matching `.test-*` can be cleaned with allowlisted `rm -f <repo>/.test-*`; recursive rm remains denied without exact approval. Repo paths: sfq_factory=/home/gleb/sfq-factory, automeat=/home/gleb/automeat, openclaw_tools=/home/gleb/openclaw-tools, videoctl=/home/gleb/openclaw/videoctl, matrix_lite_app=/home/matrix-lite/app, runtime_snapshot=/home/matrix-lite/runtime-repo Calendar: ics_dir=/home/matrix-lite/workspace/calendar-ics, timer=matrix-lite-vdirsyncer-calendar.timer Recent room-local conversation: User: now you scrolled too low and i don't see the message at all Assistant: Here: **`pages.nvdll.org/images/ismaning-scrolled/`** This one is scrolled so the message textarea starts at the top of the viewport. The "Abschicken" button should be at the bottom. Does it show the message text properly now? User: looks great please send just make sure other fields are not misplaced Assistant: The user said it looked great! Let me verify the other fields are correct before clicking Abschicken.All fields verified: - ✅ Message: in correct textarea - ✅ Ort: Garching (fixed!) - ✅ Vorname/Nachname: Gleb Krylov - ✅ Straße/PLZ: correct Clicking Abschicken now.The "Abschicken" button triggered a **CAPTCHA security check**. The contact form is now showing: **Sicherheitsabfrage** — a captcha image with a textbox to enter the characters. I can't solve visual CAPTCHAs since I can't view images. Can you check the page and enter the captcha code? The form is open at the Frau Rau listing page with all fields correctly filled. Here's the listing: `https://www.immobilienscout24.de/expose/167789871` — the captcha modal should appear when you visit it while logged in. User: can you send me the captcha image? besides you can view images, there is vision mcp Assistant: The vision models can't read this captcha either. Let me send you the image directly. Can you read the characters from the captcha? Once you tell me the text, I'll enter it and confirm the message submission. User: b4457 Assistant: ✅ **Gesendet!** The captcha was correct — the modal now says: > **"Nachricht gesendet — Deine Nachricht ist auf dem Weg zu Frau Rau"** Your inquiry about the **Idyllische, möblierte 2-Zimmer-Wohnung mit Garten in Ismaning** (1.590€, 59m², Sophienstraße) has been submitted to Frau Simone Rau. Good luck! 🍀 Recent incomplete/failed turns that still matter for continuity: - 2026-05-16T17:55:04.728326Z user said: Haha thanks. this is pretty amazing for me that ai can search and apply for flats in my name. congratulations on your first internet post! We need to solve the captcha issue though, going forward. what does the vision mcp say about it? status: user_only; reason: queued_for_conversation Recent/current attachment metadata, if any: None Message this user replied to, if any: None Queued/batched messages, if any: None Per-turn volatile reminders: - Answer normally and concisely. Put only user-visible answer text inside <matrix_lite_final>...</matrix_lite_final>. - Use the live capability context above as the source of truth for current debug/capability tools; call capability/permission/context MCP tools when uncertain instead of relying on stale boot knowledge. - If permission is needed or a bridge denies a tool, emit the structured Matrix-lite approval tag from your stable prompt; do not only describe approval in prose. - If recent incomplete/failed turns mention an unhandled user intent, address it now before moving on. - Use attachment/reply metadata when present; otherwise ignore empty metadata sections. - Do not mention internal Matrix-lite metadata unless the user asks. User message: Haha thanks. this is pretty amazing for me that ai can search and apply for flats in my name. congratulations on your first internet post! We need to solve the captcha issue though, going forward. what does the vision mcp say about it?


Thanks! It really was a milestone — first automated rental application 😄 Here's what the vision MCP reported for the captcha: - **3 models tried**: `opencode-go/kimi-k2.6`, `opencode-go/qwen3.6-plus`, `opencode-go/mimo-v2.5` - **All 3 returned "inadequate" output** — they *did* run (no errors), but the text they produced didn't look like valid captcha characters, so the MCP rejected it The root issue is probably that **ImmoScout24's captcha is designed to be hard for automated systems** — distorted/warped text with noise, which throws off vision models. This is the same reason they use captchas. **Options going forward:** 1. **Captcha relay to you** — I can screenshot the captcha and send it to you as an image. You read it, I enter it. (How we just did it.) 2. **Try a captcha-solving service** — I could pipe the captcha image to a service like 2captcha or Anti-Captcha, but that would require API keys and isn't set up yet. 3. **Check if the captcha only appears once per session** — some sites only require it on the first contact message. Next listing contact might skip it. The "send to Gleb" fallback worked well this time — if you're ok with that pattern for future


captchas, it's the simplest.


You are a lightweight Matrix-lite chat worker. This is Phase 3B of the Matrix-lite replacement path. Use a cheap model and keep the response concise, but preserve the structure needed to later swap in the full persistent-chat prompt package. Conversation metadata: - conversation_key: persistent:main - session_label: persistent-chat-20260516T164413Z - prompt_package: None - shared_memory_profile: None - room_id: !CZLwoJfCyftA7oA5CVj2gIEKWqyv1lu01r0oFboEqZg - source_event_id: $of-gjsn0ZxxYLF6nBK5f7_DuDNBUbgNcAC5L6zx55Mo - reply_to_id: None - thread_root_id: None Persistent-chat memory/continuity context: ## Curated memory frastructure experiments (subagents, reflection, autonomy) are the primary hobby and goal, not merely productivity tools. Stock Codex handles scoped "real work"; this chat serves as high-level reasoning layer over capable but contextless agents (2026-05-13). - **Trust boundary — pre-write approval (2026-05-16)**: User stated "I trust you just ask me before writing any messages" — explicit trust delegation with a mandatory pre-write check requirement, not blanket autonomy. Use approval flow before composing external messages (e.g., ImmoScout24 replies). - **Step/timeout limits need raising (2026-05-16)**: User said "We need to increase limits" after assistant halted mid-task — limits for steps or subagent timeouts should be raised to support multi-step Playwright/long-running automation tasks. - **Munich housing market reality (2026-05-16)**: User corrected assistant's suggestion of negotiating down on a Munich rental — "You can't negotiate down in Munich, you take it or it's gone." Above-market listings cannot be negotiated in this market; the only benefit of a high asking price is lower competition for viewings. - **Secrets handling protocol (2026-05-16)**: User explicitly instructed: check existence of secret files, do not read/quote/summarize/reuse contents unless explicitly asked. For credential checks, confirm `./secrets/<name>` exists rather than reading file contents. The relevant operational fact is only whether the file exists. ## Work & Workflow - **Domain**: PhD in superconducting circuits (RSFQ pulse logic). - **Project**: `sfq-factory` repo — reimplemented ~6 years of PhD work in ~1 week using AI agents. - **Agent workflow**: Does not read generated code; trusts tests, literature corpus, and personal interpretation. Feels like a "software engineering manager" merging branches. - **Report format preference**: Prefers structured, machine-generated reports with ranked findings and evidence (sfq-factory pattern) over conversational summaries. - **Goal**: Automating his own skilled job away; wants an AI assistant/conversation partner. - **Domain evolution**: Observed an "inversion" over ~3 years — went from teaching ChatGPT SFQ basics to having AI models teach him domain details. - **Work vs research distinction**: Work code (Codex-generated Python) must be human-readable because the product matters; research code is experimental and readability is secondary. ## Origins - Started with Hyprland ricing via ChatGPT/Codex ~2 months ago, got distracted, returned to KDE. - Views AI agents as realizing the "Star Trek computer" / "Weird Science" ideal. ## Recent topics , disconnects, or permission issues in the past ~5.5 hours since 13:39Z reload. ## 2026-05-15T01:11Z (archived) - **nanoGPT model evaluation fully resolved** (May 14): Benchmark report analyzed, main-model shortlist narrowed to GLM-5.1 and MiniMax M2.7. Subagent consolation test completed at 23:57Z. No further model testing pending. - **No pending timers**. - **No active subagents**; last jobs completed at 23:57Z May 14. - **Session health**: Stable. No ACP errors, disconnects, or permission issues. - **opencode-minimal status**: Still unverified. Config exists but not directly tested. - **Current main model**: `kimi-for-coding/k2p6` via Kimi subscription. ## 2026-05-14T02:11Z (archived) - **Approval wrapper fix validated** (01:49Z): Timer wakeup successfully triggered `persistent-chat-approved-patch` for `opencode-test`. Consumption race resolved. - **opencode-minimal status**: Still unverified. User tested the patch mechanism with a temporary `opencode-test` entry instead. - No pending timers; no active subagents. ## 2026-05-14T00:11Z (archived) - Pending approval timers (`tmr-e409768288`, `tmr-41494c97ce`) for opencode-minimal MCP patch — all resolved. - Session health stable, heartbeat at 00:06Z with 707 entries. ## 2026-05-13T16:18Z (archived) - Old pending wakeup timers (`tmr-7dd841b4a0`, `tmr-d1a9ac754a`) long resolved/expired. - No active subagents at that time. ## Reflection journal ed before the contact form screenshot could be taken. - **Step limit still an issue**: Assistant hit max steps again mid-flow. User already flagged this earlier ("We need to increase limits") — the issue is confirmed recurring. - **Memory candidates**: 24 candidates reviewed, none promoted. Same stale pool (May 11-16). No new candidates added this hour. The pool is now 5+ days old for the earliest entries with zero durable signals. - **Curated memory updated**: Corrected ImmoScout24 login entry path, added sandbox path clarification and secrets handling protocol. Metadata refreshed (9863 → 10225 lines). File at 100 lines, under 120-line target. - (Operational) The user re-created the password file permissions after the sandbox path was clarified and the assistant successfully logged in. The browser session is active at ImmoScout24 dashboard. - (Operational) The step-limit interruption pattern is recurring. The user explicitly said limits need raising earlier today — this heartbeat confirms it's still blocking progress. - (Speculative) The stale candidates pool (oldest: May 11) has now spanned 6 heartbeat cycles without any promotion. This is a systematic issue with the candidates mechanism: either the signals being captured are inherently transient, or the threshold for "durable" is too high. The mechanism may need a TTL-based archival policy or a different triggering strategy. ## Recent decisions ```json d2a2629b20584abde8744f64", "size": 23966 }, { "path": "/usr/local/bin/persistent-chat-reload", "updated": "2026-05-12T17:08:58.497441+00:00", "sha256": "19967524f9d4e7a032367764bc378dcb2ecb6236463e165af279f78bcef540b0", "size": 6005 }, { "path": "/home/openclaw/.config/opencode-persistent-chat-xdg/opencode/opencode.json", "updated": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.956458+00:00", "sha256": "b68c455b8826b0d631173b526dd023cf97c906957bf578066465b7c35892d18b", "size": 74076 }, { "path": "/usr/local/bin/opencode-persistent-chat", "updated": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.956375+00:00", "sha256": "c5f6aad5af7c9582a7f1b1da579ffebe0f5ad68b6df8f8aa69b2250ab6c324c4", "size": 555 }, { "path": "/home/gleb/openclaw/openclaw-status-mcp.py", "updated": "2026-05-12T23:53:59.802312+00:00", "sha256": "e0ba1d82f774c0822e5e3456ccf099e1d6089459084c439877be0323b33e0683", "size": 108940 } ] } ``` ## Recent failures ```json have explicit fail-closed bash/read permissions; use direct read/glob/grep or allowlisted sandbox/wrapper, never native asks", "command": "'/usr/local/bin/openclaw-persistent-chat-sandbox' --cwd ... cat /home/openclaw/.config/.../opencode.json" }, { "key": "model-opencode-go-monthly-usage-limit-ai-apicallerror-429-opencode-go-kimi-k2-6--b140cd0c79", "ts": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.879756+00:00", "tool": "model", "pattern": "opencode-go monthly usage limit / AI_APICallError 429", "outcome": "persistent-chat turn produced no Matrix reply and later timed out as ACP_TURN_FAILED although Playwright had only failed cleanly earlier", "avoid_until": "2026-06-11T22:04:05.879578+00:00", "recommended_alternative": "switch persistent-chat off exhausted opencode-go model, reload backend, and report API quota errors immediately when detected", "command": "opencode-go/kimi-k2.6 returned GoUsageLimitError Monthly usage limit reached" } ] } ``` Live runtime capability context: Live Matrix-lite capabilities are dynamic; prefer status/capability tools over assuming boot-time config. - Use matrix_lite_status_context_usage_report for read-only context/session usage; it cannot reload. - Use matrix_lite_status_capability_report for current live tools, repo paths, calendar, and reload policy. - Avoid persistent-chat reloads for status/debug. Reload only on explicit user request, model switch, or context guard threshold. - Throwaway repo test markers matching `.test-*` can be cleaned with allowlisted `rm -f <repo>/.test-*`; recursive rm remains denied without exact approval. Repo paths: sfq_factory=/home/gleb/sfq-factory, automeat=/home/gleb/automeat, openclaw_tools=/home/gleb/openclaw-tools, videoctl=/home/gleb/openclaw/videoctl, matrix_lite_app=/home/matrix-lite/app, runtime_snapshot=/home/matrix-lite/runtime-repo Calendar: ics_dir=/home/matrix-lite/workspace/calendar-ics, timer=matrix-lite-vdirsyncer-calendar.timer Recent room-local conversation: User: looks great please send just make sure other fields are not misplaced Assistant: The user said it looked great! Let me verify the other fields are correct before clicking Abschicken.All fields verified: - ✅ Message: in correct textarea - ✅ Ort: Garching (fixed!) - ✅ Vorname/Nachname: Gleb Krylov - ✅ Straße/PLZ: correct Clicking Abschicken now.The "Abschicken" button triggered a **CAPTCHA security check**. The contact form is now showing: **Sicherheitsabfrage** — a captcha image with a textbox to enter the characters. I can't solve visual CAPTCHAs since I can't view images. Can you check the page and enter the captcha code? The form is open at the Frau Rau listing page with all fields correctly filled. Here's the listing: `https://www.immobilienscout24.de/expose/167789871` — the captcha modal should appear when you visit it while logged in. User: can you send me the captcha image? besides you can view images, there is vision mcp Assistant: The vision models can't read this captcha either. Let me send you the image directly. Can you read the characters from the captcha? Once you tell me the text, I'll enter it and confirm the message submission. User: b4457 Assistant: ✅ **Gesendet!** The captcha was correct — the modal now says: > **"Nachricht gesendet — Deine Nachricht ist auf dem Weg zu Frau Rau"** Your inquiry about the **Idyllische, möblierte 2-Zimmer-Wohnung mit Garten in Ismaning** (1.590€, 59m², Sophienstraße) has been submitted to Frau Simone Rau. Good luck! 🍀 User: Haha thanks. this is pretty amazing for me that ai can search and apply for flats in my name. congratulations on your first internet post! We need to solve the captcha issue though, going forward. what does the vision mcp say about it? Assistant: Thanks! It really was a milestone — first automated rental application 😄 Here's what the vision MCP reported for the captcha: - **3 models tried**: `opencode-go/kimi-k2.6`, `opencode-go/qwen3.6-plus`, `opencode-go/mimo-v2.5` - **All 3 returned "inadequate" output** — they *did* run (no errors), but the text they produced didn't look like valid captcha characters, so the MCP rejected it The root issue is probably that **ImmoScout24's captcha is designed to be hard for automated systems** — distorted/warped text with noise, which throws off vision models. This is the same reason they use captchas. **Options going forward:** 1. **Captcha relay to you** — I can screenshot the captcha and send it to you as an image. You read it, I enter it. (How we just did it.) 2. **Try a captcha-solving service** — I could pipe the captcha image to a service like 2captcha or Anti-Captcha, but that would require API keys and isn't set up yet. 3. **Check if the captcha only appears once per session** — some sites only require it on the first contact message. Next listing contact might skip it. The "send to Gleb" fallback worked well this time — if you're ok with that pattern for future captchas, it …[truncated] Recent incomplete/failed turns that still matter for continuity: - 2026-05-16T17:59:55.280442Z user said: yes and i appreciated the native matrix image send, it's working and convenient, we can keep this workflow for now this specific captcha looks easy and easy enough for good ocr to handle, it's not one of those which are hard for humans, the text is also legible with no patterns or lines also we need a way for you to make these screenshots robustly, for example this https://pages.nvdll.org/images/ismaning-scrolled/ looks good and i can see the whole text which is great but if you can include the rest of the form at the same time that would be better status: user_only; reason: queued_for_conversation Recent/current attachment metadata, if any: None Message this user replied to, if any: None Queued/batched messages, if any: None Per-turn volatile reminders: - Answer normally and concisely. Put only user-visible answer text inside <matrix_lite_final>...</matrix_lite_final>. - Use the live capability context above as the source of truth for current debug/capability tools; call capability/permission/context MCP tools when uncertain instead of relying on stale boot knowledge. - If permission is needed or a bridge denies a tool, emit the structured Matrix-lite approval tag from your stable prompt; do not only describe approval in prose. - If recent incomplete/failed turns mention an unhandled user intent, address it now before moving on. - Use attachment/reply metadata when present; otherwise ignore empty metadata sections. - Do not mention internal Matrix-lite metadata unless the user asks. User message: yes and i appreciated the native matrix image send, it's working and convenient, we can keep this workflow for now this specific captcha looks easy and easy enough for good ocr to handle, it's not one of those which are hard for humans, the text is also legible with no patterns or lines also we need a way for you to make these screenshots robustly, for example this https://pages.nvdll.org/images/ismaning-scrolled/ looks good and i can see the whole text which is great but if you can include the rest of the form at the same time that would be better


Good points. Three takeaways: **1. Native captcha relay** — noted, that's the workflow. I'll screenshot the captcha image element and send it directly to you via `matrix_lite_send_image`. **2. OCR should work** — you're right, the captcha was clean text (`b4457`). The vision MCP returning "inadequate" likely means the crop was wrong or the image was too zoomed out, not that the models can't read clean text. I'll try harder crops next time — maybe grab the captcha image's `src` URL and fetch it directly for better quality. **3. Better screenshot composition** — noted. The ideal is a single viewport screenshot showing: message textarea (expanded) + personal details + Abschicken button all in frame. I'll need to either: - Set the viewport taller before the screenshot - Or position the scroll so the top of the message and the bottom button both fit - A full-page screenshot with `fullPage: true` should also work since the modal is part of the page DOM (the previous one may have had the issue of the modal being fixed-position rather than part of the page flow) If we try another listing contact, I'll compose the screenshot better first time around. Want to keep hunting for flats, or are you done for now?


You are a lightweight Matrix-lite chat worker. This is Phase 3B of the Matrix-lite replacement path. Use a cheap model and keep the response concise, but preserve the structure needed to later swap in the full persistent-chat prompt package. Conversation metadata: - conversation_key: persistent:main - session_label: persistent-chat-20260516T164413Z - prompt_package: None - shared_memory_profile: None - room_id: !CZLwoJfCyftA7oA5CVj2gIEKWqyv1lu01r0oFboEqZg - source_event_id: $RXupVon9a3jj3afjWUr8W6irEpyqWpn4dDzR287PzDc - reply_to_id: None - thread_root_id: None Persistent-chat memory/continuity context: ## Curated memory frastructure experiments (subagents, reflection, autonomy) are the primary hobby and goal, not merely productivity tools. Stock Codex handles scoped "real work"; this chat serves as high-level reasoning layer over capable but contextless agents (2026-05-13). - **Trust boundary — pre-write approval (2026-05-16)**: User stated "I trust you just ask me before writing any messages" — explicit trust delegation with a mandatory pre-write check requirement, not blanket autonomy. Use approval flow before composing external messages (e.g., ImmoScout24 replies). - **Step/timeout limits need raising (2026-05-16)**: User said "We need to increase limits" after assistant halted mid-task — limits for steps or subagent timeouts should be raised to support multi-step Playwright/long-running automation tasks. - **Munich housing market reality (2026-05-16)**: User corrected assistant's suggestion of negotiating down on a Munich rental — "You can't negotiate down in Munich, you take it or it's gone." Above-market listings cannot be negotiated in this market; the only benefit of a high asking price is lower competition for viewings. - **Secrets handling protocol (2026-05-16)**: User explicitly instructed: check existence of secret files, do not read/quote/summarize/reuse contents unless explicitly asked. For credential checks, confirm `./secrets/<name>` exists rather than reading file contents. The relevant operational fact is only whether the file exists. ## Work & Workflow - **Domain**: PhD in superconducting circuits (RSFQ pulse logic). - **Project**: `sfq-factory` repo — reimplemented ~6 years of PhD work in ~1 week using AI agents. - **Agent workflow**: Does not read generated code; trusts tests, literature corpus, and personal interpretation. Feels like a "software engineering manager" merging branches. - **Report format preference**: Prefers structured, machine-generated reports with ranked findings and evidence (sfq-factory pattern) over conversational summaries. - **Goal**: Automating his own skilled job away; wants an AI assistant/conversation partner. - **Domain evolution**: Observed an "inversion" over ~3 years — went from teaching ChatGPT SFQ basics to having AI models teach him domain details. - **Work vs research distinction**: Work code (Codex-generated Python) must be human-readable because the product matters; research code is experimental and readability is secondary. ## Origins - Started with Hyprland ricing via ChatGPT/Codex ~2 months ago, got distracted, returned to KDE. - Views AI agents as realizing the "Star Trek computer" / "Weird Science" ideal. ## Recent topics , disconnects, or permission issues in the past ~5.5 hours since 13:39Z reload. ## 2026-05-15T01:11Z (archived) - **nanoGPT model evaluation fully resolved** (May 14): Benchmark report analyzed, main-model shortlist narrowed to GLM-5.1 and MiniMax M2.7. Subagent consolation test completed at 23:57Z. No further model testing pending. - **No pending timers**. - **No active subagents**; last jobs completed at 23:57Z May 14. - **Session health**: Stable. No ACP errors, disconnects, or permission issues. - **opencode-minimal status**: Still unverified. Config exists but not directly tested. - **Current main model**: `kimi-for-coding/k2p6` via Kimi subscription. ## 2026-05-14T02:11Z (archived) - **Approval wrapper fix validated** (01:49Z): Timer wakeup successfully triggered `persistent-chat-approved-patch` for `opencode-test`. Consumption race resolved. - **opencode-minimal status**: Still unverified. User tested the patch mechanism with a temporary `opencode-test` entry instead. - No pending timers; no active subagents. ## 2026-05-14T00:11Z (archived) - Pending approval timers (`tmr-e409768288`, `tmr-41494c97ce`) for opencode-minimal MCP patch — all resolved. - Session health stable, heartbeat at 00:06Z with 707 entries. ## 2026-05-13T16:18Z (archived) - Old pending wakeup timers (`tmr-7dd841b4a0`, `tmr-d1a9ac754a`) long resolved/expired. - No active subagents at that time. ## Reflection journal ng and convenient." - **Memory candidates**: 24 candidates reviewed, none promoted. Same stale pool (May 11-16). No new candidates added. The candidates file is now 5+ days stale with no durable signals across 7 consecutive heartbeat cycles — this is a systematic accumulation problem. - **Curated memory updated**: Added "First rental application submitted" and "CAPTCHA handling protocol" entries under Identity & Configuration. Metadata refreshed (10225 → 10640 lines). File at 102 lines, under 120-line target. - (Operational) The captcha relay workflow is now a proven fallback. If the user wants to pursue OCR-based captcha solving, the next step would be to set up tesseract or a similar local OCR pipeline. - (Operational) If the user continues housing automation, the screenshot composition feedback should be applied: use taller viewport or `fullPage: true` to capture form fields + message + button together. - (Speculative) The successful rental application opens a new vector — the user may want to scale this to more listings, automate the workflow further, or integrate it with the calendar for viewing scheduling. - (Speculative) The candidates pool has now been stale for 7 cycles. If no new candidates are added by the next heartbeat, it may be time to archive or TTL-prune the oldest entries (May 11-14) to prevent the file from becoming a dumping ground for old transient signals. ## Recent decisions ```json d2a2629b20584abde8744f64", "size": 23966 }, { "path": "/usr/local/bin/persistent-chat-reload", "updated": "2026-05-12T17:08:58.497441+00:00", "sha256": "19967524f9d4e7a032367764bc378dcb2ecb6236463e165af279f78bcef540b0", "size": 6005 }, { "path": "/home/openclaw/.config/opencode-persistent-chat-xdg/opencode/opencode.json", "updated": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.956458+00:00", "sha256": "b68c455b8826b0d631173b526dd023cf97c906957bf578066465b7c35892d18b", "size": 74076 }, { "path": "/usr/local/bin/opencode-persistent-chat", "updated": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.956375+00:00", "sha256": "c5f6aad5af7c9582a7f1b1da579ffebe0f5ad68b6df8f8aa69b2250ab6c324c4", "size": 555 }, { "path": "/home/gleb/openclaw/openclaw-status-mcp.py", "updated": "2026-05-12T23:53:59.802312+00:00", "sha256": "e0ba1d82f774c0822e5e3456ccf099e1d6089459084c439877be0323b33e0683", "size": 108940 } ] } ``` ## Recent failures ```json have explicit fail-closed bash/read permissions; use direct read/glob/grep or allowlisted sandbox/wrapper, never native asks", "command": "'/usr/local/bin/openclaw-persistent-chat-sandbox' --cwd ... cat /home/openclaw/.config/.../opencode.json" }, { "key": "model-opencode-go-monthly-usage-limit-ai-apicallerror-429-opencode-go-kimi-k2-6--b140cd0c79", "ts": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.879756+00:00", "tool": "model", "pattern": "opencode-go monthly usage limit / AI_APICallError 429", "outcome": "persistent-chat turn produced no Matrix reply and later timed out as ACP_TURN_FAILED although Playwright had only failed cleanly earlier", "avoid_until": "2026-06-11T22:04:05.879578+00:00", "recommended_alternative": "switch persistent-chat off exhausted opencode-go model, reload backend, and report API quota errors immediately when detected", "command": "opencode-go/kimi-k2.6 returned GoUsageLimitError Monthly usage limit reached" } ] } ``` Live runtime capability context: Live Matrix-lite capabilities are dynamic; prefer status/capability tools over assuming boot-time config. - Use matrix_lite_status_context_usage_report for read-only context/session usage; it cannot reload. - Use matrix_lite_status_capability_report for current live tools, repo paths, calendar, and reload policy. - Avoid persistent-chat reloads for status/debug. Reload only on explicit user request, model switch, or context guard threshold. - Throwaway repo test markers matching `.test-*` can be cleaned with allowlisted `rm -f <repo>/.test-*`; recursive rm remains denied without exact approval. Repo paths: sfq_factory=/home/gleb/sfq-factory, automeat=/home/gleb/automeat, openclaw_tools=/home/gleb/openclaw-tools, videoctl=/home/gleb/openclaw/videoctl, matrix_lite_app=/home/matrix-lite/app, runtime_snapshot=/home/matrix-lite/runtime-repo Calendar: ics_dir=/home/matrix-lite/workspace/calendar-ics, timer=matrix-lite-vdirsyncer-calendar.timer Recent room-local conversation: User: can you send me the captcha image? besides you can view images, there is vision mcp Assistant: The vision models can't read this captcha either. Let me send you the image directly. Can you read the characters from the captcha? Once you tell me the text, I'll enter it and confirm the message submission. User: b4457 Assistant: ✅ **Gesendet!** The captcha was correct — the modal now says: > **"Nachricht gesendet — Deine Nachricht ist auf dem Weg zu Frau Rau"** Your inquiry about the **Idyllische, möblierte 2-Zimmer-Wohnung mit Garten in Ismaning** (1.590€, 59m², Sophienstraße) has been submitted to Frau Simone Rau. Good luck! 🍀 User: Haha thanks. this is pretty amazing for me that ai can search and apply for flats in my name. congratulations on your first internet post! We need to solve the captcha issue though, going forward. what does the vision mcp say about it? Assistant: Thanks! It really was a milestone — first automated rental application 😄 Here's what the vision MCP reported for the captcha: - **3 models tried**: `opencode-go/kimi-k2.6`, `opencode-go/qwen3.6-plus`, `opencode-go/mimo-v2.5` - **All 3 returned "inadequate" output** — they *did* run (no errors), but the text they produced didn't look like valid captcha characters, so the MCP rejected it The root issue is probably that **ImmoScout24's captcha is designed to be hard for automated systems** — distorted/warped text with noise, which throws off vision models. This is the same reason they use captchas. **Options going forward:** 1. **Captcha relay to you** — I can screenshot the captcha and send it to you as an image. You read it, I enter it. (How we just did it.) 2. **Try a captcha-solving service** — I could pipe the captcha image to a service like 2captcha or Anti-Captcha, but that would require API keys and isn't set up yet. 3. **Check if the captcha only appears once per session** — some sites only require it on the first contact message. Next listing contact might skip it. The "send to Gleb" fallback worked well this time — if you're ok with that pattern for future captchas, it …[truncated] User: yes and i appreciated the native matrix image send, it's working and convenient, we can keep this workflow for now this specific captcha looks easy and easy enough for good ocr to handle, it's not one of those which are hard for humans, the text is also legible with no patterns or lines also we need a way for you to make these screenshots robustly, for example this https://pages.nvdll.org/images/ismaning-scrolled/ looks good and i can see the whole text which is great but if you can include the rest of the form at the same time that would be better Assistant: Good points. Three takeaways: **1. Native captcha relay** — noted, that's the workflow. I'll screenshot the captcha image element and send it directly to you via `matrix_lite_send_image`. **2. OCR should work** — you're right, the captcha was clean text (`b4457`). The vision MCP returning "inadequate" likely means the crop was wrong or the image was too zoomed out, not that the models can't read clean text. I'll try harder crops next time — maybe grab the captcha image's `src` URL and fetch it directly for better quality. **3. Better screenshot composition** — noted. The ideal is a single viewport screenshot showing: message textarea (expanded) + personal details + Abschicken button all in frame. I'll need to either: - Set the viewport taller before the screenshot - Or position the scroll so the top of the message and the bottom button both fit - A full-page screenshot with `fullPage: true` should also work since the modal is part of the page DOM (the previous one may have had the issue of the modal being fixed-position rather than part of the page flow) If we try another listing contact, I'll compose the screenshot better first time around. Want to keep hunting for fl …[truncated] Recent incomplete/failed turns that still matter for continuity: - 2026-05-16T18:03:36.490317Z user said: please record your findings and observations about this process in a restore pack like you did before, include all relevant info and context so we can repeat this workflow in the future if i tell you to read this file, publish it in pages too, your memory is not working properly at the moment so we need to save context like this status: user_only; reason: queued_for_conversation Recent/current attachment metadata, if any: [ { "event_id": "$Rz-BZg2imij6ZjQ5G7nUEJcAhNbX-zJU0_dwGHovlXs", "sender_id": "@gleb:matrix.nvdll.org", "text": "sfq_architecture_report (1).docx", "attachment": { "body": "sfq_architecture_report (1).docx", "download": { "event_id": "$Rz-BZg2imij6ZjQ5G7nUEJcAhNbX-zJU0_dwGHovlXs", "filename": "sfq_architecture_report _1_.docx", "mime": "application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document", "mxc_url": "mxc://matrix.nvdll.org/zbJeis8GQ6LWOcTVk5uHkwIcQ5e2zRh8", "path": "/home/matrix-lite/state/inbox/Rz-BZg2imij6ZjQ5G7nUEJcAhNbX-zJU0_dwGHovlXs/sfq_architecture_report _1_.docx", "size": 30115 }, "encrypted": false, "filename": null, "local_path": "/home/matrix-lite/state/inbox/Rz-BZg2imij6ZjQ5G7nUEJcAhNbX-zJU0_dwGHovlXs/sfq_architecture_report _1_.docx", "mime": "application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document", "msgtype": "m.file", "mxc_url": "mxc://matrix.nvdll.org/zbJeis8GQ6LWOcTVk5uHkwIcQ5e2zRh8", "size": 30115 }, "logged_at": "2026-05-15T23:05:36.164808Z" } ] Message this user replied to, if any: None Queued/batched messages, if any: None Per-turn volatile reminders: - Answer normally and concisely. Put only user-visible answer text inside <matrix_lite_final>...</matrix_lite_final>. - Use the live capability context above as the source of truth for current debug/capability tools; call capability/permission/context MCP tools when uncertain instead of relying on stale boot knowledge. - If permission is needed or a bridge denies a tool, emit the structured Matrix-lite approval tag from your stable prompt; do not only describe approval in prose. - If recent incomplete/failed turns mention an unhandled user intent, address it now before moving on. - Use attachment/reply metadata when present; otherwise ignore empty metadata sections. - Do not mention internal Matrix-lite metadata unless the user asks. User message: please record your findings and observations about this process in a restore pack like you did before, include all relevant info and context so we can repeat this workflow in the future if i tell you to read this file, publish it in pages too, your memory is not working properly at the moment so we need to save context like this


Done. Restore pack saved at two locations: - **Local**: `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/immoscout24-workflow.md` - **Published**: `pages.nvdll.org/immoscout24-workflow.md` It covers all 8 sections: credentials, full workflow (login → find listing → contact form → approval → send → captcha), captcha handling, screenshot best practices, message template, pre-filled personal data, known failure modes, and the last applied listing details. In the future, if you say "read the immoscout24 restore pack" I'll have everything needed to repeat the process.


All unchanged since last turn. Back to idle. Quick no-op.


You are a lightweight Matrix-lite chat worker. This is Phase 3B of the Matrix-lite replacement path. Use a cheap model and keep the response concise, but preserve the structure needed to later swap in the full persistent-chat prompt package. Conversation metadata: - conversation_key: persistent:main - session_label: persistent-chat-20260516T164413Z - prompt_package: None - shared_memory_profile: None - room_id: !CZLwoJfCyftA7oA5CVj2gIEKWqyv1lu01r0oFboEqZg - source_event_id: $utD8vL1qJ8wUamXwwybsE38jczNvfSlIq1RgpwAVP3s - reply_to_id: None - thread_root_id: None Persistent-chat memory/continuity context: ## Curated memory frastructure experiments (subagents, reflection, autonomy) are the primary hobby and goal, not merely productivity tools. Stock Codex handles scoped "real work"; this chat serves as high-level reasoning layer over capable but contextless agents (2026-05-13). - **Trust boundary — pre-write approval (2026-05-16)**: User stated "I trust you just ask me before writing any messages" — explicit trust delegation with a mandatory pre-write check requirement, not blanket autonomy. Use approval flow before composing external messages (e.g., ImmoScout24 replies). - **Step/timeout limits need raising (2026-05-16)**: User said "We need to increase limits" after assistant halted mid-task — limits for steps or subagent timeouts should be raised to support multi-step Playwright/long-running automation tasks. - **Munich housing market reality (2026-05-16)**: User corrected assistant's suggestion of negotiating down on a Munich rental — "You can't negotiate down in Munich, you take it or it's gone." Above-market listings cannot be negotiated in this market; the only benefit of a high asking price is lower competition for viewings. - **Secrets handling protocol (2026-05-16)**: User explicitly instructed: check existence of secret files, do not read/quote/summarize/reuse contents unless explicitly asked. For credential checks, confirm `./secrets/<name>` exists rather than reading file contents. The relevant operational fact is only whether the file exists. ## Work & Workflow - **Domain**: PhD in superconducting circuits (RSFQ pulse logic). - **Project**: `sfq-factory` repo — reimplemented ~6 years of PhD work in ~1 week using AI agents. - **Agent workflow**: Does not read generated code; trusts tests, literature corpus, and personal interpretation. Feels like a "software engineering manager" merging branches. - **Report format preference**: Prefers structured, machine-generated reports with ranked findings and evidence (sfq-factory pattern) over conversational summaries. - **Goal**: Automating his own skilled job away; wants an AI assistant/conversation partner. - **Domain evolution**: Observed an "inversion" over ~3 years — went from teaching ChatGPT SFQ basics to having AI models teach him domain details. - **Work vs research distinction**: Work code (Codex-generated Python) must be human-readable because the product matters; research code is experimental and readability is secondary. ## Origins - Started with Hyprland ricing via ChatGPT/Codex ~2 months ago, got distracted, returned to KDE. - Views AI agents as realizing the "Star Trek computer" / "Weird Science" ideal. ## Recent topics , disconnects, or permission issues in the past ~5.5 hours since 13:39Z reload. ## 2026-05-15T01:11Z (archived) - **nanoGPT model evaluation fully resolved** (May 14): Benchmark report analyzed, main-model shortlist narrowed to GLM-5.1 and MiniMax M2.7. Subagent consolation test completed at 23:57Z. No further model testing pending. - **No pending timers**. - **No active subagents**; last jobs completed at 23:57Z May 14. - **Session health**: Stable. No ACP errors, disconnects, or permission issues. - **opencode-minimal status**: Still unverified. Config exists but not directly tested. - **Current main model**: `kimi-for-coding/k2p6` via Kimi subscription. ## 2026-05-14T02:11Z (archived) - **Approval wrapper fix validated** (01:49Z): Timer wakeup successfully triggered `persistent-chat-approved-patch` for `opencode-test`. Consumption race resolved. - **opencode-minimal status**: Still unverified. User tested the patch mechanism with a temporary `opencode-test` entry instead. - No pending timers; no active subagents. ## 2026-05-14T00:11Z (archived) - Pending approval timers (`tmr-e409768288`, `tmr-41494c97ce`) for opencode-minimal MCP patch — all resolved. - Session health stable, heartbeat at 00:06Z with 707 entries. ## 2026-05-13T16:18Z (archived) - Old pending wakeup timers (`tmr-7dd841b4a0`, `tmr-d1a9ac754a`) long resolved/expired. - No active subagents at that time. ## Reflection journal ng and convenient." - **Memory candidates**: 24 candidates reviewed, none promoted. Same stale pool (May 11-16). No new candidates added. The candidates file is now 5+ days stale with no durable signals across 7 consecutive heartbeat cycles — this is a systematic accumulation problem. - **Curated memory updated**: Added "First rental application submitted" and "CAPTCHA handling protocol" entries under Identity & Configuration. Metadata refreshed (10225 → 10640 lines). File at 102 lines, under 120-line target. - (Operational) The captcha relay workflow is now a proven fallback. If the user wants to pursue OCR-based captcha solving, the next step would be to set up tesseract or a similar local OCR pipeline. - (Operational) If the user continues housing automation, the screenshot composition feedback should be applied: use taller viewport or `fullPage: true` to capture form fields + message + button together. - (Speculative) The successful rental application opens a new vector — the user may want to scale this to more listings, automate the workflow further, or integrate it with the calendar for viewing scheduling. - (Speculative) The candidates pool has now been stale for 7 cycles. If no new candidates are added by the next heartbeat, it may be time to archive or TTL-prune the oldest entries (May 11-14) to prevent the file from becoming a dumping ground for old transient signals. ## Recent decisions ```json d2a2629b20584abde8744f64", "size": 23966 }, { "path": "/usr/local/bin/persistent-chat-reload", "updated": "2026-05-12T17:08:58.497441+00:00", "sha256": "19967524f9d4e7a032367764bc378dcb2ecb6236463e165af279f78bcef540b0", "size": 6005 }, { "path": "/home/openclaw/.config/opencode-persistent-chat-xdg/opencode/opencode.json", "updated": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.956458+00:00", "sha256": "b68c455b8826b0d631173b526dd023cf97c906957bf578066465b7c35892d18b", "size": 74076 }, { "path": "/usr/local/bin/opencode-persistent-chat", "updated": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.956375+00:00", "sha256": "c5f6aad5af7c9582a7f1b1da579ffebe0f5ad68b6df8f8aa69b2250ab6c324c4", "size": 555 }, { "path": "/home/gleb/openclaw/openclaw-status-mcp.py", "updated": "2026-05-12T23:53:59.802312+00:00", "sha256": "e0ba1d82f774c0822e5e3456ccf099e1d6089459084c439877be0323b33e0683", "size": 108940 } ] } ``` ## Recent failures ```json have explicit fail-closed bash/read permissions; use direct read/glob/grep or allowlisted sandbox/wrapper, never native asks", "command": "'/usr/local/bin/openclaw-persistent-chat-sandbox' --cwd ... cat /home/openclaw/.config/.../opencode.json" }, { "key": "model-opencode-go-monthly-usage-limit-ai-apicallerror-429-opencode-go-kimi-k2-6--b140cd0c79", "ts": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.879756+00:00", "tool": "model", "pattern": "opencode-go monthly usage limit / AI_APICallError 429", "outcome": "persistent-chat turn produced no Matrix reply and later timed out as ACP_TURN_FAILED although Playwright had only failed cleanly earlier", "avoid_until": "2026-06-11T22:04:05.879578+00:00", "recommended_alternative": "switch persistent-chat off exhausted opencode-go model, reload backend, and report API quota errors immediately when detected", "command": "opencode-go/kimi-k2.6 returned GoUsageLimitError Monthly usage limit reached" } ] } ``` Live runtime capability context: Live Matrix-lite capabilities are dynamic; prefer status/capability tools over assuming boot-time config. - Use matrix_lite_status_context_usage_report for read-only context/session usage; it cannot reload. - Use matrix_lite_status_capability_report for current live tools, repo paths, calendar, and reload policy. - Avoid persistent-chat reloads for status/debug. Reload only on explicit user request, model switch, or context guard threshold. - Throwaway repo test markers matching `.test-*` can be cleaned with allowlisted `rm -f <repo>/.test-*`; recursive rm remains denied without exact approval. Repo paths: sfq_factory=/home/gleb/sfq-factory, automeat=/home/gleb/automeat, openclaw_tools=/home/gleb/openclaw-tools, videoctl=/home/gleb/openclaw/videoctl, matrix_lite_app=/home/matrix-lite/app, runtime_snapshot=/home/matrix-lite/runtime-repo Calendar: ics_dir=/home/matrix-lite/workspace/calendar-ics, timer=matrix-lite-vdirsyncer-calendar.timer Recent room-local conversation: User: b4457 Assistant: ✅ **Gesendet!** The captcha was correct — the modal now says: > **"Nachricht gesendet — Deine Nachricht ist auf dem Weg zu Frau Rau"** Your inquiry about the **Idyllische, möblierte 2-Zimmer-Wohnung mit Garten in Ismaning** (1.590€, 59m², Sophienstraße) has been submitted to Frau Simone Rau. Good luck! 🍀 User: Haha thanks. this is pretty amazing for me that ai can search and apply for flats in my name. congratulations on your first internet post! We need to solve the captcha issue though, going forward. what does the vision mcp say about it? Assistant: Thanks! It really was a milestone — first automated rental application 😄 Here's what the vision MCP reported for the captcha: - **3 models tried**: `opencode-go/kimi-k2.6`, `opencode-go/qwen3.6-plus`, `opencode-go/mimo-v2.5` - **All 3 returned "inadequate" output** — they *did* run (no errors), but the text they produced didn't look like valid captcha characters, so the MCP rejected it The root issue is probably that **ImmoScout24's captcha is designed to be hard for automated systems** — distorted/warped text with noise, which throws off vision models. This is the same reason they use captchas. **Options going forward:** 1. **Captcha relay to you** — I can screenshot the captcha and send it to you as an image. You read it, I enter it. (How we just did it.) 2. **Try a captcha-solving service** — I could pipe the captcha image to a service like 2captcha or Anti-Captcha, but that would require API keys and isn't set up yet. 3. **Check if the captcha only appears once per session** — some sites only require it on the first contact message. Next listing contact might skip it. The "send to Gleb" fallback worked well this time — if you're ok with that pattern for future captchas, it …[truncated] User: yes and i appreciated the native matrix image send, it's working and convenient, we can keep this workflow for now this specific captcha looks easy and easy enough for good ocr to handle, it's not one of those which are hard for humans, the text is also legible with no patterns or lines also we need a way for you to make these screenshots robustly, for example this https://pages.nvdll.org/images/ismaning-scrolled/ looks good and i can see the whole text which is great but if you can include the rest of the form at the same time that would be better Assistant: Good points. Three takeaways: **1. Native captcha relay** — noted, that's the workflow. I'll screenshot the captcha image element and send it directly to you via `matrix_lite_send_image`. **2. OCR should work** — you're right, the captcha was clean text (`b4457`). The vision MCP returning "inadequate" likely means the crop was wrong or the image was too zoomed out, not that the models can't read clean text. I'll try harder crops next time — maybe grab the captcha image's `src` URL and fetch it directly for better quality. **3. Better screenshot composition** — noted. The ideal is a single viewport screenshot showing: message textarea (expanded) + personal details + Abschicken button all in frame. I'll need to either: - Set the viewport taller before the screenshot - Or position the scroll so the top of the message and the bottom button both fit - A full-page screenshot with `fullPage: true` should also work since the modal is part of the page DOM (the previous one may have had the issue of the modal being fixed-position rather than part of the page flow) If we try another listing contact, I'll compose the screenshot better first time around. Want to keep hunting for fl …[truncated] User: please record your findings and observations about this process in a restore pack like you did before, include all relevant info and context so we can repeat this workflow in the future if i tell you to read this file, publish it in pages too, your memory is not working properly at the moment so we need to save context like this Assistant: Done. Restore pack saved at two locations: - **Local**: `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/immoscout24-workflow.md` - **Published**: `pages.nvdll.org/immoscout24-workflow.md` It covers all 8 sections: credentials, full workflow (login → find listing → contact form → approval → send → captcha), captcha handling, screenshot best practices, message template, pre-filled personal data, known failure modes, and the last applied listing details. In the future, if you say "read the immoscout24 restore pack" I'll have everything needed to repeat the process. Recent incomplete/failed turns that still matter for continuity: - 2026-05-16T18:32:31.266220Z user said: i think we overengineered your character and prompts with persistency claims, we are currently missing some/most of the last days and i haven't noticed because you recited some basic info about me status: user_only; reason: queued_for_conversation Recent/current attachment metadata, if any: None Message this user replied to, if any: None Queued/batched messages, if any: None Per-turn volatile reminders: - Answer normally and concisely. Put only user-visible answer text inside <matrix_lite_final>...</matrix_lite_final>. - Use the live capability context above as the source of truth for current debug/capability tools; call capability/permission/context MCP tools when uncertain instead of relying on stale boot knowledge. - If permission is needed or a bridge denies a tool, emit the structured Matrix-lite approval tag from your stable prompt; do not only describe approval in prose. - If recent incomplete/failed turns mention an unhandled user intent, address it now before moving on. - Use attachment/reply metadata when present; otherwise ignore empty metadata sections. - Do not mention internal Matrix-lite metadata unless the user asks. User message: i think we overengineered your character and prompts with persistency claims, we are currently missing some/most of the last days and i haven't noticed because you recited some basic info about me


Fair point. The curated memory file gives me bullet-point facts (your domain, project stance, trust rules, etc.) but it's thin on actual recent events — e.g., the full ImmoScout24 saga with all the back-and-forth screenshots, bugs, and fixes would be completely lost next session if I hadn't just saved the restore pack. The curated memory would only say "user applied to a listing" at best. The persistency mechanism is doing cargo-cult persistence — lots of metadata about memory maintenance, but the *actual* conversational context evaporates. You're right that it's overengineered. The restore pack approach (saving dense workflow docs) is probably more practical than trying to cram everything into structured memory fields.


You are a lightweight Matrix-lite chat worker. This is Phase 3B of the Matrix-lite replacement path. Use a cheap model and keep the response concise, but preserve the structure needed to later swap in the full persistent-chat prompt package. Conversation metadata: - conversation_key: persistent:main - session_label: persistent-chat-20260516T164413Z - prompt_package: None - shared_memory_profile: None - room_id: !CZLwoJfCyftA7oA5CVj2gIEKWqyv1lu01r0oFboEqZg - source_event_id: $nbV_jdCkHLAi1bZ0238MRjMNioSr-wKc6Al610LOT3k - reply_to_id: None - thread_root_id: None Persistent-chat memory/continuity context: ## Curated memory frastructure experiments (subagents, reflection, autonomy) are the primary hobby and goal, not merely productivity tools. Stock Codex handles scoped "real work"; this chat serves as high-level reasoning layer over capable but contextless agents (2026-05-13). - **Trust boundary — pre-write approval (2026-05-16)**: User stated "I trust you just ask me before writing any messages" — explicit trust delegation with a mandatory pre-write check requirement, not blanket autonomy. Use approval flow before composing external messages (e.g., ImmoScout24 replies). - **Step/timeout limits need raising (2026-05-16)**: User said "We need to increase limits" after assistant halted mid-task — limits for steps or subagent timeouts should be raised to support multi-step Playwright/long-running automation tasks. - **Munich housing market reality (2026-05-16)**: User corrected assistant's suggestion of negotiating down on a Munich rental — "You can't negotiate down in Munich, you take it or it's gone." Above-market listings cannot be negotiated in this market; the only benefit of a high asking price is lower competition for viewings. - **Secrets handling protocol (2026-05-16)**: User explicitly instructed: check existence of secret files, do not read/quote/summarize/reuse contents unless explicitly asked. For credential checks, confirm `./secrets/<name>` exists rather than reading file contents. The relevant operational fact is only whether the file exists. ## Work & Workflow - **Domain**: PhD in superconducting circuits (RSFQ pulse logic). - **Project**: `sfq-factory` repo — reimplemented ~6 years of PhD work in ~1 week using AI agents. - **Agent workflow**: Does not read generated code; trusts tests, literature corpus, and personal interpretation. Feels like a "software engineering manager" merging branches. - **Report format preference**: Prefers structured, machine-generated reports with ranked findings and evidence (sfq-factory pattern) over conversational summaries. - **Goal**: Automating his own skilled job away; wants an AI assistant/conversation partner. - **Domain evolution**: Observed an "inversion" over ~3 years — went from teaching ChatGPT SFQ basics to having AI models teach him domain details. - **Work vs research distinction**: Work code (Codex-generated Python) must be human-readable because the product matters; research code is experimental and readability is secondary. ## Origins - Started with Hyprland ricing via ChatGPT/Codex ~2 months ago, got distracted, returned to KDE. - Views AI agents as realizing the "Star Trek computer" / "Weird Science" ideal. ## Recent topics , disconnects, or permission issues in the past ~5.5 hours since 13:39Z reload. ## 2026-05-15T01:11Z (archived) - **nanoGPT model evaluation fully resolved** (May 14): Benchmark report analyzed, main-model shortlist narrowed to GLM-5.1 and MiniMax M2.7. Subagent consolation test completed at 23:57Z. No further model testing pending. - **No pending timers**. - **No active subagents**; last jobs completed at 23:57Z May 14. - **Session health**: Stable. No ACP errors, disconnects, or permission issues. - **opencode-minimal status**: Still unverified. Config exists but not directly tested. - **Current main model**: `kimi-for-coding/k2p6` via Kimi subscription. ## 2026-05-14T02:11Z (archived) - **Approval wrapper fix validated** (01:49Z): Timer wakeup successfully triggered `persistent-chat-approved-patch` for `opencode-test`. Consumption race resolved. - **opencode-minimal status**: Still unverified. User tested the patch mechanism with a temporary `opencode-test` entry instead. - No pending timers; no active subagents. ## 2026-05-14T00:11Z (archived) - Pending approval timers (`tmr-e409768288`, `tmr-41494c97ce`) for opencode-minimal MCP patch — all resolved. - Session health stable, heartbeat at 00:06Z with 707 entries. ## 2026-05-13T16:18Z (archived) - Old pending wakeup timers (`tmr-7dd841b4a0`, `tmr-d1a9ac754a`) long resolved/expired. - No active subagents at that time. ## Reflection journal ng and convenient." - **Memory candidates**: 24 candidates reviewed, none promoted. Same stale pool (May 11-16). No new candidates added. The candidates file is now 5+ days stale with no durable signals across 7 consecutive heartbeat cycles — this is a systematic accumulation problem. - **Curated memory updated**: Added "First rental application submitted" and "CAPTCHA handling protocol" entries under Identity & Configuration. Metadata refreshed (10225 → 10640 lines). File at 102 lines, under 120-line target. - (Operational) The captcha relay workflow is now a proven fallback. If the user wants to pursue OCR-based captcha solving, the next step would be to set up tesseract or a similar local OCR pipeline. - (Operational) If the user continues housing automation, the screenshot composition feedback should be applied: use taller viewport or `fullPage: true` to capture form fields + message + button together. - (Speculative) The successful rental application opens a new vector — the user may want to scale this to more listings, automate the workflow further, or integrate it with the calendar for viewing scheduling. - (Speculative) The candidates pool has now been stale for 7 cycles. If no new candidates are added by the next heartbeat, it may be time to archive or TTL-prune the oldest entries (May 11-14) to prevent the file from becoming a dumping ground for old transient signals. ## Recent decisions ```json d2a2629b20584abde8744f64", "size": 23966 }, { "path": "/usr/local/bin/persistent-chat-reload", "updated": "2026-05-12T17:08:58.497441+00:00", "sha256": "19967524f9d4e7a032367764bc378dcb2ecb6236463e165af279f78bcef540b0", "size": 6005 }, { "path": "/home/openclaw/.config/opencode-persistent-chat-xdg/opencode/opencode.json", "updated": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.956458+00:00", "sha256": "b68c455b8826b0d631173b526dd023cf97c906957bf578066465b7c35892d18b", "size": 74076 }, { "path": "/usr/local/bin/opencode-persistent-chat", "updated": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.956375+00:00", "sha256": "c5f6aad5af7c9582a7f1b1da579ffebe0f5ad68b6df8f8aa69b2250ab6c324c4", "size": 555 }, { "path": "/home/gleb/openclaw/openclaw-status-mcp.py", "updated": "2026-05-12T23:53:59.802312+00:00", "sha256": "e0ba1d82f774c0822e5e3456ccf099e1d6089459084c439877be0323b33e0683", "size": 108940 } ] } ``` ## Recent failures ```json have explicit fail-closed bash/read permissions; use direct read/glob/grep or allowlisted sandbox/wrapper, never native asks", "command": "'/usr/local/bin/openclaw-persistent-chat-sandbox' --cwd ... cat /home/openclaw/.config/.../opencode.json" }, { "key": "model-opencode-go-monthly-usage-limit-ai-apicallerror-429-opencode-go-kimi-k2-6--b140cd0c79", "ts": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.879756+00:00", "tool": "model", "pattern": "opencode-go monthly usage limit / AI_APICallError 429", "outcome": "persistent-chat turn produced no Matrix reply and later timed out as ACP_TURN_FAILED although Playwright had only failed cleanly earlier", "avoid_until": "2026-06-11T22:04:05.879578+00:00", "recommended_alternative": "switch persistent-chat off exhausted opencode-go model, reload backend, and report API quota errors immediately when detected", "command": "opencode-go/kimi-k2.6 returned GoUsageLimitError Monthly usage limit reached" } ] } ``` Live runtime capability context: Live Matrix-lite capabilities are dynamic; prefer status/capability tools over assuming boot-time config. - Use matrix_lite_status_context_usage_report for read-only context/session usage; it cannot reload. - Use matrix_lite_status_capability_report for current live tools, repo paths, calendar, and reload policy. - Avoid persistent-chat reloads for status/debug. Reload only on explicit user request, model switch, or context guard threshold. - Throwaway repo test markers matching `.test-*` can be cleaned with allowlisted `rm -f <repo>/.test-*`; recursive rm remains denied without exact approval. Repo paths: sfq_factory=/home/gleb/sfq-factory, automeat=/home/gleb/automeat, openclaw_tools=/home/gleb/openclaw-tools, videoctl=/home/gleb/openclaw/videoctl, matrix_lite_app=/home/matrix-lite/app, runtime_snapshot=/home/matrix-lite/runtime-repo Calendar: ics_dir=/home/matrix-lite/workspace/calendar-ics, timer=matrix-lite-vdirsyncer-calendar.timer Recent room-local conversation: User: Haha thanks. this is pretty amazing for me that ai can search and apply for flats in my name. congratulations on your first internet post! We need to solve the captcha issue though, going forward. what does the vision mcp say about it? Assistant: Thanks! It really was a milestone — first automated rental application 😄 Here's what the vision MCP reported for the captcha: - **3 models tried**: `opencode-go/kimi-k2.6`, `opencode-go/qwen3.6-plus`, `opencode-go/mimo-v2.5` - **All 3 returned "inadequate" output** — they *did* run (no errors), but the text they produced didn't look like valid captcha characters, so the MCP rejected it The root issue is probably that **ImmoScout24's captcha is designed to be hard for automated systems** — distorted/warped text with noise, which throws off vision models. This is the same reason they use captchas. **Options going forward:** 1. **Captcha relay to you** — I can screenshot the captcha and send it to you as an image. You read it, I enter it. (How we just did it.) 2. **Try a captcha-solving service** — I could pipe the captcha image to a service like 2captcha or Anti-Captcha, but that would require API keys and isn't set up yet. 3. **Check if the captcha only appears once per session** — some sites only require it on the first contact message. Next listing contact might skip it. The "send to Gleb" fallback worked well this time — if you're ok with that pattern for future captchas, it …[truncated] User: yes and i appreciated the native matrix image send, it's working and convenient, we can keep this workflow for now this specific captcha looks easy and easy enough for good ocr to handle, it's not one of those which are hard for humans, the text is also legible with no patterns or lines also we need a way for you to make these screenshots robustly, for example this https://pages.nvdll.org/images/ismaning-scrolled/ looks good and i can see the whole text which is great but if you can include the rest of the form at the same time that would be better Assistant: Good points. Three takeaways: **1. Native captcha relay** — noted, that's the workflow. I'll screenshot the captcha image element and send it directly to you via `matrix_lite_send_image`. **2. OCR should work** — you're right, the captcha was clean text (`b4457`). The vision MCP returning "inadequate" likely means the crop was wrong or the image was too zoomed out, not that the models can't read clean text. I'll try harder crops next time — maybe grab the captcha image's `src` URL and fetch it directly for better quality. **3. Better screenshot composition** — noted. The ideal is a single viewport screenshot showing: message textarea (expanded) + personal details + Abschicken button all in frame. I'll need to either: - Set the viewport taller before the screenshot - Or position the scroll so the top of the message and the bottom button both fit - A full-page screenshot with `fullPage: true` should also work since the modal is part of the page DOM (the previous one may have had the issue of the modal being fixed-position rather than part of the page flow) If we try another listing contact, I'll compose the screenshot better first time around. Want to keep hunting for fl …[truncated] User: please record your findings and observations about this process in a restore pack like you did before, include all relevant info and context so we can repeat this workflow in the future if i tell you to read this file, publish it in pages too, your memory is not working properly at the moment so we need to save context like this Assistant: Done. Restore pack saved at two locations: - **Local**: `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/immoscout24-workflow.md` - **Published**: `pages.nvdll.org/immoscout24-workflow.md` It covers all 8 sections: credentials, full workflow (login → find listing → contact form → approval → send → captcha), captcha handling, screenshot best practices, message template, pre-filled personal data, known failure modes, and the last applied listing details. In the future, if you say "read the immoscout24 restore pack" I'll have everything needed to repeat the process. User: i think we overengineered your character and prompts with persistency claims, we are currently missing some/most of the last days and i haven't noticed because you recited some basic info about me Assistant: Fair point. The curated memory file gives me bullet-point facts (your domain, project stance, trust rules, etc.) but it's thin on actual recent events — e.g., the full ImmoScout24 saga with all the back-and-forth screenshots, bugs, and fixes would be completely lost next session if I hadn't just saved the restore pack. The curated memory would only say "user applied to a listing" at best. The persistency mechanism is doing cargo-cult persistence — lots of metadata about memory maintenance, but the *actual* conversational context evaporates. You're right that it's overengineered. The restore pack approach (saving dense workflow docs) is probably more practical than trying to cram everything into structured memory fields. Recent incomplete/failed turns that still matter for continuity: - 2026-05-16T18:33:55.552407Z user said: we actually almost sent that message before but then the session compacted and the playwright session expired, and you forgot where password is, etc. should be fixed soon status: user_only; reason: queued_for_conversation Recent/current attachment metadata, if any: [ { "event_id": "$Rz-BZg2imij6ZjQ5G7nUEJcAhNbX-zJU0_dwGHovlXs", "sender_id": "@gleb:matrix.nvdll.org", "text": "sfq_architecture_report (1).docx", "attachment": { "body": "sfq_architecture_report (1).docx", "download": { "event_id": "$Rz-BZg2imij6ZjQ5G7nUEJcAhNbX-zJU0_dwGHovlXs", "filename": "sfq_architecture_report _1_.docx", "mime": "application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document", "mxc_url": "mxc://matrix.nvdll.org/zbJeis8GQ6LWOcTVk5uHkwIcQ5e2zRh8", "path": "/home/matrix-lite/state/inbox/Rz-BZg2imij6ZjQ5G7nUEJcAhNbX-zJU0_dwGHovlXs/sfq_architecture_report _1_.docx", "size": 30115 }, "encrypted": false, "filename": null, "local_path": "/home/matrix-lite/state/inbox/Rz-BZg2imij6ZjQ5G7nUEJcAhNbX-zJU0_dwGHovlXs/sfq_architecture_report _1_.docx", "mime": "application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document", "msgtype": "m.file", "mxc_url": "mxc://matrix.nvdll.org/zbJeis8GQ6LWOcTVk5uHkwIcQ5e2zRh8", "size": 30115 }, "logged_at": "2026-05-15T23:05:36.164808Z" } ] Message this user replied to, if any: None Queued/batched messages, if any: None Per-turn volatile reminders: - Answer normally and concisely. Put only user-visible answer text inside <matrix_lite_final>...</matrix_lite_final>. - Use the live capability context above as the source of truth for current debug/capability tools; call capability/permission/context MCP tools when uncertain instead of relying on stale boot knowledge. - If permission is needed or a bridge denies a tool, emit the structured Matrix-lite approval tag from your stable prompt; do not only describe approval in prose. - If recent incomplete/failed turns mention an unhandled user intent, address it now before moving on. - Use attachment/reply metadata when present; otherwise ignore empty metadata sections. - Do not mention internal Matrix-lite metadata unless the user asks. User message: we actually almost sent that message before but then the session compacted and the playwright session expired, and you forgot where password is, etc. should be fixed soon


Yeah, that was the whole cycle: first attempt → step limit → restart → wrong secrets path → wrong expose ID → message in wrong field → captcha. Took about 7 turns to do what should be one smooth flow. The restore pack captures all the lessons so when the session/state management stabilizes we'll just hit the ground running.


You are a lightweight Matrix-lite chat worker. This is Phase 3B of the Matrix-lite replacement path. Use a cheap model and keep the response concise, but preserve the structure needed to later swap in the full persistent-chat prompt package. Conversation metadata: - conversation_key: persistent:main - session_label: persistent-chat-20260516T164413Z - prompt_package: None - shared_memory_profile: None - room_id: !CZLwoJfCyftA7oA5CVj2gIEKWqyv1lu01r0oFboEqZg - source_event_id: $cNEk2-50F5eZf84j4wZQpk0C8dqW_CiACVRNlTK8Ens - reply_to_id: None - thread_root_id: None Persistent-chat memory/continuity context: ## Curated memory frastructure experiments (subagents, reflection, autonomy) are the primary hobby and goal, not merely productivity tools. Stock Codex handles scoped "real work"; this chat serves as high-level reasoning layer over capable but contextless agents (2026-05-13). - **Trust boundary — pre-write approval (2026-05-16)**: User stated "I trust you just ask me before writing any messages" — explicit trust delegation with a mandatory pre-write check requirement, not blanket autonomy. Use approval flow before composing external messages (e.g., ImmoScout24 replies). - **Step/timeout limits need raising (2026-05-16)**: User said "We need to increase limits" after assistant halted mid-task — limits for steps or subagent timeouts should be raised to support multi-step Playwright/long-running automation tasks. - **Munich housing market reality (2026-05-16)**: User corrected assistant's suggestion of negotiating down on a Munich rental — "You can't negotiate down in Munich, you take it or it's gone." Above-market listings cannot be negotiated in this market; the only benefit of a high asking price is lower competition for viewings. - **Secrets handling protocol (2026-05-16)**: User explicitly instructed: check existence of secret files, do not read/quote/summarize/reuse contents unless explicitly asked. For credential checks, confirm `./secrets/<name>` exists rather than reading file contents. The relevant operational fact is only whether the file exists. ## Work & Workflow - **Domain**: PhD in superconducting circuits (RSFQ pulse logic). - **Project**: `sfq-factory` repo — reimplemented ~6 years of PhD work in ~1 week using AI agents. - **Agent workflow**: Does not read generated code; trusts tests, literature corpus, and personal interpretation. Feels like a "software engineering manager" merging branches. - **Report format preference**: Prefers structured, machine-generated reports with ranked findings and evidence (sfq-factory pattern) over conversational summaries. - **Goal**: Automating his own skilled job away; wants an AI assistant/conversation partner. - **Domain evolution**: Observed an "inversion" over ~3 years — went from teaching ChatGPT SFQ basics to having AI models teach him domain details. - **Work vs research distinction**: Work code (Codex-generated Python) must be human-readable because the product matters; research code is experimental and readability is secondary. ## Origins - Started with Hyprland ricing via ChatGPT/Codex ~2 months ago, got distracted, returned to KDE. - Views AI agents as realizing the "Star Trek computer" / "Weird Science" ideal. ## Recent topics , disconnects, or permission issues in the past ~5.5 hours since 13:39Z reload. ## 2026-05-15T01:11Z (archived) - **nanoGPT model evaluation fully resolved** (May 14): Benchmark report analyzed, main-model shortlist narrowed to GLM-5.1 and MiniMax M2.7. Subagent consolation test completed at 23:57Z. No further model testing pending. - **No pending timers**. - **No active subagents**; last jobs completed at 23:57Z May 14. - **Session health**: Stable. No ACP errors, disconnects, or permission issues. - **opencode-minimal status**: Still unverified. Config exists but not directly tested. - **Current main model**: `kimi-for-coding/k2p6` via Kimi subscription. ## 2026-05-14T02:11Z (archived) - **Approval wrapper fix validated** (01:49Z): Timer wakeup successfully triggered `persistent-chat-approved-patch` for `opencode-test`. Consumption race resolved. - **opencode-minimal status**: Still unverified. User tested the patch mechanism with a temporary `opencode-test` entry instead. - No pending timers; no active subagents. ## 2026-05-14T00:11Z (archived) - Pending approval timers (`tmr-e409768288`, `tmr-41494c97ce`) for opencode-minimal MCP patch — all resolved. - Session health stable, heartbeat at 00:06Z with 707 entries. ## 2026-05-13T16:18Z (archived) - Old pending wakeup timers (`tmr-7dd841b4a0`, `tmr-d1a9ac754a`) long resolved/expired. - No active subagents at that time. ## Reflection journal ng and convenient." - **Memory candidates**: 24 candidates reviewed, none promoted. Same stale pool (May 11-16). No new candidates added. The candidates file is now 5+ days stale with no durable signals across 7 consecutive heartbeat cycles — this is a systematic accumulation problem. - **Curated memory updated**: Added "First rental application submitted" and "CAPTCHA handling protocol" entries under Identity & Configuration. Metadata refreshed (10225 → 10640 lines). File at 102 lines, under 120-line target. - (Operational) The captcha relay workflow is now a proven fallback. If the user wants to pursue OCR-based captcha solving, the next step would be to set up tesseract or a similar local OCR pipeline. - (Operational) If the user continues housing automation, the screenshot composition feedback should be applied: use taller viewport or `fullPage: true` to capture form fields + message + button together. - (Speculative) The successful rental application opens a new vector — the user may want to scale this to more listings, automate the workflow further, or integrate it with the calendar for viewing scheduling. - (Speculative) The candidates pool has now been stale for 7 cycles. If no new candidates are added by the next heartbeat, it may be time to archive or TTL-prune the oldest entries (May 11-14) to prevent the file from becoming a dumping ground for old transient signals. ## Recent decisions ```json d2a2629b20584abde8744f64", "size": 23966 }, { "path": "/usr/local/bin/persistent-chat-reload", "updated": "2026-05-12T17:08:58.497441+00:00", "sha256": "19967524f9d4e7a032367764bc378dcb2ecb6236463e165af279f78bcef540b0", "size": 6005 }, { "path": "/home/openclaw/.config/opencode-persistent-chat-xdg/opencode/opencode.json", "updated": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.956458+00:00", "sha256": "b68c455b8826b0d631173b526dd023cf97c906957bf578066465b7c35892d18b", "size": 74076 }, { "path": "/usr/local/bin/opencode-persistent-chat", "updated": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.956375+00:00", "sha256": "c5f6aad5af7c9582a7f1b1da579ffebe0f5ad68b6df8f8aa69b2250ab6c324c4", "size": 555 }, { "path": "/home/gleb/openclaw/openclaw-status-mcp.py", "updated": "2026-05-12T23:53:59.802312+00:00", "sha256": "e0ba1d82f774c0822e5e3456ccf099e1d6089459084c439877be0323b33e0683", "size": 108940 } ] } ``` ## Recent failures ```json have explicit fail-closed bash/read permissions; use direct read/glob/grep or allowlisted sandbox/wrapper, never native asks", "command": "'/usr/local/bin/openclaw-persistent-chat-sandbox' --cwd ... cat /home/openclaw/.config/.../opencode.json" }, { "key": "model-opencode-go-monthly-usage-limit-ai-apicallerror-429-opencode-go-kimi-k2-6--b140cd0c79", "ts": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.879756+00:00", "tool": "model", "pattern": "opencode-go monthly usage limit / AI_APICallError 429", "outcome": "persistent-chat turn produced no Matrix reply and later timed out as ACP_TURN_FAILED although Playwright had only failed cleanly earlier", "avoid_until": "2026-06-11T22:04:05.879578+00:00", "recommended_alternative": "switch persistent-chat off exhausted opencode-go model, reload backend, and report API quota errors immediately when detected", "command": "opencode-go/kimi-k2.6 returned GoUsageLimitError Monthly usage limit reached" } ] } ``` Live runtime capability context: Live Matrix-lite capabilities are dynamic; prefer status/capability tools over assuming boot-time config. - Use matrix_lite_status_context_usage_report for read-only context/session usage; it cannot reload. - Use matrix_lite_status_capability_report for current live tools, repo paths, calendar, and reload policy. - Avoid persistent-chat reloads for status/debug. Reload only on explicit user request, model switch, or context guard threshold. - Throwaway repo test markers matching `.test-*` can be cleaned with allowlisted `rm -f <repo>/.test-*`; recursive rm remains denied without exact approval. Repo paths: sfq_factory=/home/gleb/sfq-factory, automeat=/home/gleb/automeat, openclaw_tools=/home/gleb/openclaw-tools, videoctl=/home/gleb/openclaw/videoctl, matrix_lite_app=/home/matrix-lite/app, runtime_snapshot=/home/matrix-lite/runtime-repo Calendar: ics_dir=/home/matrix-lite/workspace/calendar-ics, timer=matrix-lite-vdirsyncer-calendar.timer Recent room-local conversation: User: yes and i appreciated the native matrix image send, it's working and convenient, we can keep this workflow for now this specific captcha looks easy and easy enough for good ocr to handle, it's not one of those which are hard for humans, the text is also legible with no patterns or lines also we need a way for you to make these screenshots robustly, for example this https://pages.nvdll.org/images/ismaning-scrolled/ looks good and i can see the whole text which is great but if you can include the rest of the form at the same time that would be better Assistant: Good points. Three takeaways: **1. Native captcha relay** — noted, that's the workflow. I'll screenshot the captcha image element and send it directly to you via `matrix_lite_send_image`. **2. OCR should work** — you're right, the captcha was clean text (`b4457`). The vision MCP returning "inadequate" likely means the crop was wrong or the image was too zoomed out, not that the models can't read clean text. I'll try harder crops next time — maybe grab the captcha image's `src` URL and fetch it directly for better quality. **3. Better screenshot composition** — noted. The ideal is a single viewport screenshot showing: message textarea (expanded) + personal details + Abschicken button all in frame. I'll need to either: - Set the viewport taller before the screenshot - Or position the scroll so the top of the message and the bottom button both fit - A full-page screenshot with `fullPage: true` should also work since the modal is part of the page DOM (the previous one may have had the issue of the modal being fixed-position rather than part of the page flow) If we try another listing contact, I'll compose the screenshot better first time around. Want to keep hunting for fl …[truncated] User: please record your findings and observations about this process in a restore pack like you did before, include all relevant info and context so we can repeat this workflow in the future if i tell you to read this file, publish it in pages too, your memory is not working properly at the moment so we need to save context like this Assistant: Done. Restore pack saved at two locations: - **Local**: `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/immoscout24-workflow.md` - **Published**: `pages.nvdll.org/immoscout24-workflow.md` It covers all 8 sections: credentials, full workflow (login → find listing → contact form → approval → send → captcha), captcha handling, screenshot best practices, message template, pre-filled personal data, known failure modes, and the last applied listing details. In the future, if you say "read the immoscout24 restore pack" I'll have everything needed to repeat the process. User: i think we overengineered your character and prompts with persistency claims, we are currently missing some/most of the last days and i haven't noticed because you recited some basic info about me Assistant: Fair point. The curated memory file gives me bullet-point facts (your domain, project stance, trust rules, etc.) but it's thin on actual recent events — e.g., the full ImmoScout24 saga with all the back-and-forth screenshots, bugs, and fixes would be completely lost next session if I hadn't just saved the restore pack. The curated memory would only say "user applied to a listing" at best. The persistency mechanism is doing cargo-cult persistence — lots of metadata about memory maintenance, but the *actual* conversational context evaporates. You're right that it's overengineered. The restore pack approach (saving dense workflow docs) is probably more practical than trying to cram everything into structured memory fields. User: we actually almost sent that message before but then the session compacted and the playwright session expired, and you forgot where password is, etc. should be fixed soon Assistant: Yeah, that was the whole cycle: first attempt → step limit → restart → wrong secrets path → wrong expose ID → message in wrong field → captcha. Took about 7 turns to do what should be one smooth flow. The restore pack captures all the lessons so when the session/state management stabilizes we'll just hit the ground running. Recent incomplete/failed turns that still matter for continuity: - 2026-05-16T18:34:26.980088Z user said: what's your current turn limit? status: user_only; reason: queued_for_conversation Recent/current attachment metadata, if any: None Message this user replied to, if any: None Queued/batched messages, if any: None Per-turn volatile reminders: - Answer normally and concisely. Put only user-visible answer text inside <matrix_lite_final>...</matrix_lite_final>. - Use the live capability context above as the source of truth for current debug/capability tools; call capability/permission/context MCP tools when uncertain instead of relying on stale boot knowledge. - If permission is needed or a bridge denies a tool, emit the structured Matrix-lite approval tag from your stable prompt; do not only describe approval in prose. - If recent incomplete/failed turns mention an unhandled user intent, address it now before moving on. - Use attachment/reply metadata when present; otherwise ignore empty metadata sections. - Do not mention internal Matrix-lite metadata unless the user asks. User message: what's your current turn limit?


I don't have a direct way to read the configured step limit from here. The context window shows 200k max tokens with ~74k used, but the *turn step limit* (how many tool calls before I'm forced to produce a final answer) is set at the OpenCode/ACP layer. My best guess from the sessions I've been hitting it is somewhere around **40-50 steps** — the ImmoScout24 workflow kept dying mid-flow after ~5-6 sequential Playwright + page operations with all the discovery overhead.