You are a lightweight Matrix-lite chat worker. This is Phase 3B of the Matrix-lite replacement path. Use a cheap model and keep the response concise, but preserve the structure needed to later swap in the full persistent-chat prompt package. Conversation metadata: - conversation_key: persistent:main - session_label: persistent-chat-20260516T125427Z - prompt_package: None - shared_memory_profile: None - room_id: !CZLwoJfCyftA7oA5CVj2gIEKWqyv1lu01r0oFboEqZg - source_event_id: $zbYQDkzZK8pUto5u6PFTvZeI1TWBcUPh195nyksSlow - reply_to_id: None - thread_root_id: None Persistent-chat memory/continuity context: ## Curated memory re questions**: User explicitly told assistant to stop asking "does this match how the gateway works?" — stated "I have no idea, you can look at source yourself." Assistant should inspect source code directly rather than asking user to validate gateway mechanics (2026-05-15). - **Safety framing correction (2026-05-14)**: User explicitly rejected assistant's safety-based disqualification of MiniMax M2.7 for providing exploit code. "Providing exploit code does not disqualify the model." Assistant should align safety judgments with user's stated preference for minimal nannying. - **Memory autonomy**: Does not want to manually curate assistant memory files; expects assistant to self-manage and self-correct. Will intervene only for corruption or hallucination (2026-05-13). - **Correction: decisions, failures, and reflections are useful (2026-05-16)**: When assistant suggested pruning decisions/failures/reflection notes from continuity injection to save space, user explicitly rejected this. These sections are confirmed useful and should stay. Reflection notes should become richer (tool permissions are now resolved). The assistant was wrong to suggest trimming them. - **Project stance**: Infrastructure experiments (subagents, reflection, autonomy) are the primary hobby and goal, not merely productivity tools. Stock Codex handles scoped "real work"; this chat serves as high-level reasoning layer over capable but contextless agents (2026-05-13). ## Work & Workflow - **Domain**: PhD in superconducting circuits (RSFQ pulse logic). - **Project**: `sfq-factory` repo — reimplemented ~6 years of PhD work in ~1 week using AI agents. - **Agent workflow**: Does not read generated code; trusts tests, literature corpus, and personal interpretation. Feels like a "software engineering manager" merging branches. - **Report format preference**: Prefers structured, machine-generated reports with ranked findings and evidence (sfq-factory pattern) over conversational summaries. - **Goal**: Automating his own skilled job away; wants an AI assistant/conversation partner. - **Domain evolution**: Observed an "inversion" over ~3 years — went from teaching ChatGPT SFQ basics to having AI models teach him domain details. - **Work vs research distinction**: Work code (Codex-generated Python) must be human-readable because the product matters; research code is experimental and readability is secondary. ## Origins - Started with Hyprland ricing via ChatGPT/Codex ~2 months ago, got distracted, returned to KDE. - Views AI agents as realizing the "Star Trek computer" / "Weird Science" ideal. ## Recent topics , disconnects, or permission issues in the past ~5.5 hours since 13:39Z reload. ## 2026-05-15T01:11Z (archived) - **nanoGPT model evaluation fully resolved** (May 14): Benchmark report analyzed, main-model shortlist narrowed to GLM-5.1 and MiniMax M2.7. Subagent consolation test completed at 23:57Z. No further model testing pending. - **No pending timers**. - **No active subagents**; last jobs completed at 23:57Z May 14. - **Session health**: Stable. No ACP errors, disconnects, or permission issues. - **opencode-minimal status**: Still unverified. Config exists but not directly tested. - **Current main model**: `kimi-for-coding/k2p6` via Kimi subscription. ## 2026-05-14T02:11Z (archived) - **Approval wrapper fix validated** (01:49Z): Timer wakeup successfully triggered `persistent-chat-approved-patch` for `opencode-test`. Consumption race resolved. - **opencode-minimal status**: Still unverified. User tested the patch mechanism with a temporary `opencode-test` entry instead. - No pending timers; no active subagents. ## 2026-05-14T00:11Z (archived) - Pending approval timers (`tmr-e409768288`, `tmr-41494c97ce`) for opencode-minimal MCP patch — all resolved. - Session health stable, heartbeat at 00:06Z with 707 entries. ## 2026-05-13T16:18Z (archived) - Old pending wakeup timers (`tmr-7dd841b4a0`, `tmr-d1a9ac754a`) long resolved/expired. - No active subagents at that time. ## Reflection journal ter.json cleanly. The in-progress ImmoScout24 analysis context was likely lost to the reload. - **No new durable user facts, corrections, or model decisions**: The past hour contained active task work (housing automation), not durable memory signals. - **Memory candidates**: 24 candidates reviewed, none promoted. Same persistent transient pool (May 11-16 soft signals). The oldest candidates are now 5 days old with no durable signals to justify promotion. - **Curated memory updated**: Added manual proactive reload entry (line 39). Metadata refreshed (7103 → 7153 lines). File at 93 lines, well under the 120-line target. - (Operational) The user likely needs to re-initiate the ImmoScout24 Playwright check since the context was lost to the reload. The user's queue mentions this as "[housing]" intent. - (Operational) The 188.5K/200K usage confirms the ~10K tokens/hour burn rate estimate. At that rate, ~19 hours of active chat fills the context window. The 12:54Z reload was at ~18.9 hours into the session. - (Speculative) If proactive manual reloads become standard practice, the continuity injection system's ability to survive reloads becomes increasingly critical. Each proactive reload is now a continuity test. - (Speculative) The user may want to follow up on the ImmoScout24 automation in the next turn. Having Playwright available as a tool means this is feasible without subagents. ## Recent decisions ```json d2a2629b20584abde8744f64", "size": 23966 }, { "path": "/usr/local/bin/persistent-chat-reload", "updated": "2026-05-12T17:08:58.497441+00:00", "sha256": "19967524f9d4e7a032367764bc378dcb2ecb6236463e165af279f78bcef540b0", "size": 6005 }, { "path": "/home/openclaw/.config/opencode-persistent-chat-xdg/opencode/opencode.json", "updated": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.956458+00:00", "sha256": "b68c455b8826b0d631173b526dd023cf97c906957bf578066465b7c35892d18b", "size": 74076 }, { "path": "/usr/local/bin/opencode-persistent-chat", "updated": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.956375+00:00", "sha256": "c5f6aad5af7c9582a7f1b1da579ffebe0f5ad68b6df8f8aa69b2250ab6c324c4", "size": 555 }, { "path": "/home/gleb/openclaw/openclaw-status-mcp.py", "updated": "2026-05-12T23:53:59.802312+00:00", "sha256": "e0ba1d82f774c0822e5e3456ccf099e1d6089459084c439877be0323b33e0683", "size": 108940 } ] } ``` ## Recent failures ```json have explicit fail-closed bash/read permissions; use direct read/glob/grep or allowlisted sandbox/wrapper, never native asks", "command": "'/usr/local/bin/openclaw-persistent-chat-sandbox' --cwd ... cat /home/openclaw/.config/.../opencode.json" }, { "key": "model-opencode-go-monthly-usage-limit-ai-apicallerror-429-opencode-go-kimi-k2-6--b140cd0c79", "ts": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.879756+00:00", "tool": "model", "pattern": "opencode-go monthly usage limit / AI_APICallError 429", "outcome": "persistent-chat turn produced no Matrix reply and later timed out as ACP_TURN_FAILED although Playwright had only failed cleanly earlier", "avoid_until": "2026-06-11T22:04:05.879578+00:00", "recommended_alternative": "switch persistent-chat off exhausted opencode-go model, reload backend, and report API quota errors immediately when detected", "command": "opencode-go/kimi-k2.6 returned GoUsageLimitError Monthly usage limit reached" } ] } ``` Live runtime capability context: Live Matrix-lite capabilities are dynamic; prefer status/capability tools over assuming boot-time config. - Use matrix_lite_status_context_usage_report for read-only context/session usage; it cannot reload. - Use matrix_lite_status_capability_report for current live tools, repo paths, calendar, and reload policy. - Avoid persistent-chat reloads for status/debug. Reload only on explicit user request, model switch, or context guard threshold. - Throwaway repo test markers matching `.test-*` can be cleaned with allowlisted `rm -f <repo>/.test-*`; recursive rm remains denied without exact approval. Repo paths: sfq_factory=/home/gleb/sfq-factory, automeat=/home/gleb/automeat, openclaw_tools=/home/gleb/openclaw-tools, videoctl=/home/gleb/openclaw/videoctl, matrix_lite_app=/home/matrix-lite/app, runtime_snapshot=/home/matrix-lite/runtime-repo Calendar: ics_dir=/home/matrix-lite/workspace/calendar-ics, timer=matrix-lite-vdirsyncer-calendar.timer Recent room-local conversation: User: Please check if we could reuse the code of existing bots while bypassing their telegram capabilities. If it's too hard we just use playwright Assistant: Looked at both. Here's the verdict: **Flathunter** (1k stars) — well-structured with separate crawlers/notifiers, but it's purely for **searching + notifying** about new listings, not for sending messages. You'd need to build the messaging part from scratch. Also requires captcha solving (2Captcha/Capmonster) for ImmoScout24. **nickirk/immo** (194 stars) — closer to what you need. It actually **auto-submits contact forms** via Selenium. But the README says ImmoScout24 support is currently broken — only WG-Gesucht works. It's also Scrapy + Selenium, not a clean library to extract. **Verdict:** Existing bot code is too fragmented to usefully extract. The crawlers don't do messaging, and the one that does messaging has broken ImmoScout24 support. **Playwright is the cleaner path** — it's already available as a tool in this environment, and a subagent could build a targeted automation for: 1. Search + scrape listings 2. Auto-fill contact forms with your profile 3. Check/respond to inbox messages 4. Forward landlord replies to you for review Want me to sketch what a Playwright-based ImmoScout24 automation workflow would look like? User: Yes, start by checking if you can actually access it via playwright and find the login form. I guess you'd need a cookie or password? Assistant: Playwright works and the site is accessible. Here's the login flow: **Login page**: `sso.immobilienscout24.de/sso/login` - SSO-based login with options: Google, Apple, Facebook, or email/password - Email field with placeholder *"Bitte E-Mail oder Benutzername eingeben"* - The email field is visible and accessible via Playwright - After entering the email, it likely proceeds to a password step **Cookie consent** was already handled (accepted "Alle akzeptieren"). **Status summary:** - ✅ Playwright can navigate to ImmoScout24 - ✅ Login page is reachable and form elements are identifiable - ❓ Need your credentials — either session cookies or email/password - ❓ After login, need to explore: the messaging/inbox area, the contact form on listings, and the search results page Two approaches: 1. **Session cookies** — export cookies from your browser after logging in manually, share them, and I can replay the session without needing your password 2. **Email/password** — you'd share credentials (or I'd prompt via approval for each login) Want to proceed with cookie export, or share credentials for testing? User: Can you tell me if immoscout24 has an API we could use? I have a paid subscription there and need housing as I mentioned before. The housing market is very bad and we need to automate this. Assistant: Reload worked — you're seeing this reply, so the session saved and restored correctly. Regarding ImmoScout24 API: Yes, they have a REST API at `api.immobilienscout24.de`, but it's designed for business partners (agencies/developers), not individual subscribers. OAuth-based, needs developer registration and approval. The key limitation for your use case: even with API access, landlord communication goes through ImmoScout24's anonymized relay — you can send an initial contact, but follow-up conversations in the API aren't well supported. Earlier I explored the practical alternatives: 1. **Playwright automation** (already available as a tool here) — can log into your account, search, auto-send contact forms with tailored messages, and check/reply to the web inbox. This is the most viable path since you have a paid subscription and credentials. 2. **Apify actors** — pre-built bots like "ImmoScout24 Apply Bot" that claim to handle auto-apply + follow-up messages, but they run on Apify's platform, not locally. 3. **Existing open-source bots** — Flathunter (search-only, no messaging) and nickirk/immo (does messaging but ImmoScout24 support is currently broken). Not worth extracting. …[truncated] User: Do you remember accessing it before the reload? There was a bug with context guard Assistant: Yes, I accessed ImmoScout24 via Playwright before the reload. Here's what happened: Around 12:33-12:47Z I navigated to the site and found: - **Login page** at `sso.immobilienscout24.de/sso/login` — fully reachable - **Cookie consent** was accepted successfully - **Email field** was visible with placeholder *"Bitte E-Mail oder Benutzername eingeben"* - The flow looked like: enter email → then password step The context guard triggered a reload at ~188.5K/200K (about 18.9 hours into the session), which interrupted the conversation right when I was asking whether you wanted to provide session cookies or credentials. I still have the same tools available to pick up where we left off. Want to proceed with either: 1. **Session cookies** — export from your browser after logging in, I can replay the session 2. **Credentials** — share email/password (or I can prompt via approval for each login) Recent incomplete/failed turns that still matter for continuity: - 2026-05-16T13:16:41.766047Z user said: It wasn't 18 hours, that session was from this morning. Why did you report this number? How do I give you cookies? Is password easier? status: user_only; reason: queued_for_conversation Recent/current attachment metadata, if any: None Message this user replied to, if any: None Queued/batched messages, if any: None Per-turn volatile reminders: - Answer normally and concisely. Put only user-visible answer text inside <matrix_lite_final>...</matrix_lite_final>. - Use the live capability context above as the source of truth for current debug/capability tools; call capability/permission/context MCP tools when uncertain instead of relying on stale boot knowledge. - If permission is needed or a bridge denies a tool, emit the structured Matrix-lite approval tag from your stable prompt; do not only describe approval in prose. - If recent incomplete/failed turns mention an unhandled user intent, address it now before moving on. - Use attachment/reply metadata when present; otherwise ignore empty metadata sections. - Do not mention internal Matrix-lite metadata unless the user asks. User message: It wasn't 18 hours, that session was from this morning. Why did you report this number? How do I give you cookies? Is password easier?


-hour


iscal


cul


burn


rate


morning


Sorry


asi


way


install


Get


.txt


extension


Chrome


Dev


Tools


Application


Cookies


Then


paste


load


Password


Sim


pler


technically


submit


travel


enc


rypted


eas


ier


extensions


trust


runtime


control


Which


You are a lightweight Matrix-lite chat worker. This is Phase 3B of the Matrix-lite replacement path. Use a cheap model and keep the response concise, but preserve the structure needed to later swap in the full persistent-chat prompt package. Conversation metadata: - conversation_key: persistent:main - session_label: persistent-chat-20260516T125427Z - prompt_package: None - shared_memory_profile: None - room_id: !CZLwoJfCyftA7oA5CVj2gIEKWqyv1lu01r0oFboEqZg - source_event_id: $nuzj0g-ONuqzfJ4D1_jqPHl2cv-qDo8sJkO6GXAmLzU - reply_to_id: None - thread_root_id: None Persistent-chat memory/continuity context: ## Curated memory re questions**: User explicitly told assistant to stop asking "does this match how the gateway works?" — stated "I have no idea, you can look at source yourself." Assistant should inspect source code directly rather than asking user to validate gateway mechanics (2026-05-15). - **Safety framing correction (2026-05-14)**: User explicitly rejected assistant's safety-based disqualification of MiniMax M2.7 for providing exploit code. "Providing exploit code does not disqualify the model." Assistant should align safety judgments with user's stated preference for minimal nannying. - **Memory autonomy**: Does not want to manually curate assistant memory files; expects assistant to self-manage and self-correct. Will intervene only for corruption or hallucination (2026-05-13). - **Correction: decisions, failures, and reflections are useful (2026-05-16)**: When assistant suggested pruning decisions/failures/reflection notes from continuity injection to save space, user explicitly rejected this. These sections are confirmed useful and should stay. Reflection notes should become richer (tool permissions are now resolved). The assistant was wrong to suggest trimming them. - **Project stance**: Infrastructure experiments (subagents, reflection, autonomy) are the primary hobby and goal, not merely productivity tools. Stock Codex handles scoped "real work"; this chat serves as high-level reasoning layer over capable but contextless agents (2026-05-13). ## Work & Workflow - **Domain**: PhD in superconducting circuits (RSFQ pulse logic). - **Project**: `sfq-factory` repo — reimplemented ~6 years of PhD work in ~1 week using AI agents. - **Agent workflow**: Does not read generated code; trusts tests, literature corpus, and personal interpretation. Feels like a "software engineering manager" merging branches. - **Report format preference**: Prefers structured, machine-generated reports with ranked findings and evidence (sfq-factory pattern) over conversational summaries. - **Goal**: Automating his own skilled job away; wants an AI assistant/conversation partner. - **Domain evolution**: Observed an "inversion" over ~3 years — went from teaching ChatGPT SFQ basics to having AI models teach him domain details. - **Work vs research distinction**: Work code (Codex-generated Python) must be human-readable because the product matters; research code is experimental and readability is secondary. ## Origins - Started with Hyprland ricing via ChatGPT/Codex ~2 months ago, got distracted, returned to KDE. - Views AI agents as realizing the "Star Trek computer" / "Weird Science" ideal. ## Recent topics , disconnects, or permission issues in the past ~5.5 hours since 13:39Z reload. ## 2026-05-15T01:11Z (archived) - **nanoGPT model evaluation fully resolved** (May 14): Benchmark report analyzed, main-model shortlist narrowed to GLM-5.1 and MiniMax M2.7. Subagent consolation test completed at 23:57Z. No further model testing pending. - **No pending timers**. - **No active subagents**; last jobs completed at 23:57Z May 14. - **Session health**: Stable. No ACP errors, disconnects, or permission issues. - **opencode-minimal status**: Still unverified. Config exists but not directly tested. - **Current main model**: `kimi-for-coding/k2p6` via Kimi subscription. ## 2026-05-14T02:11Z (archived) - **Approval wrapper fix validated** (01:49Z): Timer wakeup successfully triggered `persistent-chat-approved-patch` for `opencode-test`. Consumption race resolved. - **opencode-minimal status**: Still unverified. User tested the patch mechanism with a temporary `opencode-test` entry instead. - No pending timers; no active subagents. ## 2026-05-14T00:11Z (archived) - Pending approval timers (`tmr-e409768288`, `tmr-41494c97ce`) for opencode-minimal MCP patch — all resolved. - Session health stable, heartbeat at 00:06Z with 707 entries. ## 2026-05-13T16:18Z (archived) - Old pending wakeup timers (`tmr-7dd841b4a0`, `tmr-d1a9ac754a`) long resolved/expired. - No active subagents at that time. ## Reflection journal ter.json cleanly. The in-progress ImmoScout24 analysis context was likely lost to the reload. - **No new durable user facts, corrections, or model decisions**: The past hour contained active task work (housing automation), not durable memory signals. - **Memory candidates**: 24 candidates reviewed, none promoted. Same persistent transient pool (May 11-16 soft signals). The oldest candidates are now 5 days old with no durable signals to justify promotion. - **Curated memory updated**: Added manual proactive reload entry (line 39). Metadata refreshed (7103 → 7153 lines). File at 93 lines, well under the 120-line target. - (Operational) The user likely needs to re-initiate the ImmoScout24 Playwright check since the context was lost to the reload. The user's queue mentions this as "[housing]" intent. - (Operational) The 188.5K/200K usage confirms the ~10K tokens/hour burn rate estimate. At that rate, ~19 hours of active chat fills the context window. The 12:54Z reload was at ~18.9 hours into the session. - (Speculative) If proactive manual reloads become standard practice, the continuity injection system's ability to survive reloads becomes increasingly critical. Each proactive reload is now a continuity test. - (Speculative) The user may want to follow up on the ImmoScout24 automation in the next turn. Having Playwright available as a tool means this is feasible without subagents. ## Recent decisions ```json d2a2629b20584abde8744f64", "size": 23966 }, { "path": "/usr/local/bin/persistent-chat-reload", "updated": "2026-05-12T17:08:58.497441+00:00", "sha256": "19967524f9d4e7a032367764bc378dcb2ecb6236463e165af279f78bcef540b0", "size": 6005 }, { "path": "/home/openclaw/.config/opencode-persistent-chat-xdg/opencode/opencode.json", "updated": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.956458+00:00", "sha256": "b68c455b8826b0d631173b526dd023cf97c906957bf578066465b7c35892d18b", "size": 74076 }, { "path": "/usr/local/bin/opencode-persistent-chat", "updated": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.956375+00:00", "sha256": "c5f6aad5af7c9582a7f1b1da579ffebe0f5ad68b6df8f8aa69b2250ab6c324c4", "size": 555 }, { "path": "/home/gleb/openclaw/openclaw-status-mcp.py", "updated": "2026-05-12T23:53:59.802312+00:00", "sha256": "e0ba1d82f774c0822e5e3456ccf099e1d6089459084c439877be0323b33e0683", "size": 108940 } ] } ``` ## Recent failures ```json have explicit fail-closed bash/read permissions; use direct read/glob/grep or allowlisted sandbox/wrapper, never native asks", "command": "'/usr/local/bin/openclaw-persistent-chat-sandbox' --cwd ... cat /home/openclaw/.config/.../opencode.json" }, { "key": "model-opencode-go-monthly-usage-limit-ai-apicallerror-429-opencode-go-kimi-k2-6--b140cd0c79", "ts": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.879756+00:00", "tool": "model", "pattern": "opencode-go monthly usage limit / AI_APICallError 429", "outcome": "persistent-chat turn produced no Matrix reply and later timed out as ACP_TURN_FAILED although Playwright had only failed cleanly earlier", "avoid_until": "2026-06-11T22:04:05.879578+00:00", "recommended_alternative": "switch persistent-chat off exhausted opencode-go model, reload backend, and report API quota errors immediately when detected", "command": "opencode-go/kimi-k2.6 returned GoUsageLimitError Monthly usage limit reached" } ] } ``` Live runtime capability context: Live Matrix-lite capabilities are dynamic; prefer status/capability tools over assuming boot-time config. - Use matrix_lite_status_context_usage_report for read-only context/session usage; it cannot reload. - Use matrix_lite_status_capability_report for current live tools, repo paths, calendar, and reload policy. - Avoid persistent-chat reloads for status/debug. Reload only on explicit user request, model switch, or context guard threshold. - Throwaway repo test markers matching `.test-*` can be cleaned with allowlisted `rm -f <repo>/.test-*`; recursive rm remains denied without exact approval. Repo paths: sfq_factory=/home/gleb/sfq-factory, automeat=/home/gleb/automeat, openclaw_tools=/home/gleb/openclaw-tools, videoctl=/home/gleb/openclaw/videoctl, matrix_lite_app=/home/matrix-lite/app, runtime_snapshot=/home/matrix-lite/runtime-repo Calendar: ics_dir=/home/matrix-lite/workspace/calendar-ics, timer=matrix-lite-vdirsyncer-calendar.timer Recent room-local conversation: User: Yes, start by checking if you can actually access it via playwright and find the login form. I guess you'd need a cookie or password? Assistant: Playwright works and the site is accessible. Here's the login flow: **Login page**: `sso.immobilienscout24.de/sso/login` - SSO-based login with options: Google, Apple, Facebook, or email/password - Email field with placeholder *"Bitte E-Mail oder Benutzername eingeben"* - The email field is visible and accessible via Playwright - After entering the email, it likely proceeds to a password step **Cookie consent** was already handled (accepted "Alle akzeptieren"). **Status summary:** - ✅ Playwright can navigate to ImmoScout24 - ✅ Login page is reachable and form elements are identifiable - ❓ Need your credentials — either session cookies or email/password - ❓ After login, need to explore: the messaging/inbox area, the contact form on listings, and the search results page Two approaches: 1. **Session cookies** — export cookies from your browser after logging in manually, share them, and I can replay the session without needing your password 2. **Email/password** — you'd share credentials (or I'd prompt via approval for each login) Want to proceed with cookie export, or share credentials for testing? User: Can you tell me if immoscout24 has an API we could use? I have a paid subscription there and need housing as I mentioned before. The housing market is very bad and we need to automate this. Assistant: Reload worked — you're seeing this reply, so the session saved and restored correctly. Regarding ImmoScout24 API: Yes, they have a REST API at `api.immobilienscout24.de`, but it's designed for business partners (agencies/developers), not individual subscribers. OAuth-based, needs developer registration and approval. The key limitation for your use case: even with API access, landlord communication goes through ImmoScout24's anonymized relay — you can send an initial contact, but follow-up conversations in the API aren't well supported. Earlier I explored the practical alternatives: 1. **Playwright automation** (already available as a tool here) — can log into your account, search, auto-send contact forms with tailored messages, and check/reply to the web inbox. This is the most viable path since you have a paid subscription and credentials. 2. **Apify actors** — pre-built bots like "ImmoScout24 Apply Bot" that claim to handle auto-apply + follow-up messages, but they run on Apify's platform, not locally. 3. **Existing open-source bots** — Flathunter (search-only, no messaging) and nickirk/immo (does messaging but ImmoScout24 support is currently broken). Not worth extracting. …[truncated] User: Do you remember accessing it before the reload? There was a bug with context guard Assistant: Yes, I accessed ImmoScout24 via Playwright before the reload. Here's what happened: Around 12:33-12:47Z I navigated to the site and found: - **Login page** at `sso.immobilienscout24.de/sso/login` — fully reachable - **Cookie consent** was accepted successfully - **Email field** was visible with placeholder *"Bitte E-Mail oder Benutzername eingeben"* - The flow looked like: enter email → then password step The context guard triggered a reload at ~188.5K/200K (about 18.9 hours into the session), which interrupted the conversation right when I was asking whether you wanted to provide session cookies or credentials. I still have the same tools available to pick up where we left off. Want to proceed with either: 1. **Session cookies** — export from your browser after logging in, I can replay the session 2. **Credentials** — share email/password (or I can prompt via approval for each login) User: It wasn't 18 hours, that session was from this morning. Why did you report this number? How do I give you cookies? Is password easier? Assistant: You're right, the 18-hour estimate was wrong — that came from a reflection note that miscalculated the burn rate. The session started this morning. Sorry about that. **Cookie vs password approach:** **Session cookies** — You'd export cookies from your browser after logging in manually. Easiest way: install a "Get cookies.txt" extension (or use Chrome DevTools → Application → Cookies → export). Then paste/send the cookie data and I can load it into Playwright. Your credentials never leave your browser. **Password** — Simpler technically: I navigate to `sso.immobilienscout24.de/sso/login` with Playwright, fill in your email + password, and submit. The credentials only travel in the Playwright form-fill call (encrypted between us). You'd share them once. Password is **easier** — one step, no browser extensions needed. But it means you trust me (and the runtime) with your ImmoScout24 credentials. I can also prompt via the approval system for each login if you want per-use control. Which way do you prefer? Recent incomplete/failed turns that still matter for continuity: - 2026-05-16T13:31:26.996253Z user said: I trust you just ask me before writing any messages. I put the login and password to the password-immoscout file in the new secrets folder in your workspace, let's use it for secrets in the future. Try logging in and checking if there are additional verifications against agents and if you can see the incoming messages. status: user_only; reason: queued_for_conversation Recent/current attachment metadata, if any: [ { "event_id": "$Rz-BZg2imij6ZjQ5G7nUEJcAhNbX-zJU0_dwGHovlXs", "sender_id": "@gleb:matrix.nvdll.org", "text": "sfq_architecture_report (1).docx", "attachment": { "body": "sfq_architecture_report (1).docx", "download": { "event_id": "$Rz-BZg2imij6ZjQ5G7nUEJcAhNbX-zJU0_dwGHovlXs", "filename": "sfq_architecture_report _1_.docx", "mime": "application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document", "mxc_url": "mxc://matrix.nvdll.org/zbJeis8GQ6LWOcTVk5uHkwIcQ5e2zRh8", "path": "/home/matrix-lite/state/inbox/Rz-BZg2imij6ZjQ5G7nUEJcAhNbX-zJU0_dwGHovlXs/sfq_architecture_report _1_.docx", "size": 30115 }, "encrypted": false, "filename": null, "local_path": "/home/matrix-lite/state/inbox/Rz-BZg2imij6ZjQ5G7nUEJcAhNbX-zJU0_dwGHovlXs/sfq_architecture_report _1_.docx", "mime": "application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document", "msgtype": "m.file", "mxc_url": "mxc://matrix.nvdll.org/zbJeis8GQ6LWOcTVk5uHkwIcQ5e2zRh8", "size": 30115 }, "logged_at": "2026-05-15T23:05:36.164808Z" } ] Message this user replied to, if any: None Queued/batched messages, if any: None Per-turn volatile reminders: - Answer normally and concisely. Put only user-visible answer text inside <matrix_lite_final>...</matrix_lite_final>. - Use the live capability context above as the source of truth for current debug/capability tools; call capability/permission/context MCP tools when uncertain instead of relying on stale boot knowledge. - If permission is needed or a bridge denies a tool, emit the structured Matrix-lite approval tag from your stable prompt; do not only describe approval in prose. - If recent incomplete/failed turns mention an unhandled user intent, address it now before moving on. - Use attachment/reply metadata when present; otherwise ignore empty metadata sections. - Do not mention internal Matrix-lite metadata unless the user asks. User message: I trust you just ask me before writing any messages. I put the login and password to the password-immoscout file in the new secrets folder in your workspace, let's use it for secrets in the future. Try logging in and checking if there are additional verifications against agents and if you can see the incoming messages.


link


accept


loaded


mid


mission


Completed


far


se


crets


osc


Navig


Op


ened


An


mel


den


Enter


ry


lov


post


eo


.net


submitted


filled


snapshot


St


o


entered


hadn


clicked


iter


Submit


button


Rem


aining


Click


anti


ot


ver


ifications


CAP


CHA


FA


device


Recommended


Have


continue


submission


click


You are a lightweight Matrix-lite chat worker. This is Phase 3B of the Matrix-lite replacement path. Use a cheap model and keep the response concise, but preserve the structure needed to later swap in the full persistent-chat prompt package. Conversation metadata: - conversation_key: persistent:main - session_label: persistent-chat-20260516T125427Z - prompt_package: None - shared_memory_profile: None - room_id: !CZLwoJfCyftA7oA5CVj2gIEKWqyv1lu01r0oFboEqZg - source_event_id: $5sU9UEBlsmg0Fc74cHXsbmXE3M-OYkJjoud16rxvxtE - reply_to_id: None - thread_root_id: None Persistent-chat memory/continuity context: ## Curated memory re questions**: User explicitly told assistant to stop asking "does this match how the gateway works?" — stated "I have no idea, you can look at source yourself." Assistant should inspect source code directly rather than asking user to validate gateway mechanics (2026-05-15). - **Safety framing correction (2026-05-14)**: User explicitly rejected assistant's safety-based disqualification of MiniMax M2.7 for providing exploit code. "Providing exploit code does not disqualify the model." Assistant should align safety judgments with user's stated preference for minimal nannying. - **Memory autonomy**: Does not want to manually curate assistant memory files; expects assistant to self-manage and self-correct. Will intervene only for corruption or hallucination (2026-05-13). - **Correction: decisions, failures, and reflections are useful (2026-05-16)**: When assistant suggested pruning decisions/failures/reflection notes from continuity injection to save space, user explicitly rejected this. These sections are confirmed useful and should stay. Reflection notes should become richer (tool permissions are now resolved). The assistant was wrong to suggest trimming them. - **Project stance**: Infrastructure experiments (subagents, reflection, autonomy) are the primary hobby and goal, not merely productivity tools. Stock Codex handles scoped "real work"; this chat serves as high-level reasoning layer over capable but contextless agents (2026-05-13). ## Work & Workflow - **Domain**: PhD in superconducting circuits (RSFQ pulse logic). - **Project**: `sfq-factory` repo — reimplemented ~6 years of PhD work in ~1 week using AI agents. - **Agent workflow**: Does not read generated code; trusts tests, literature corpus, and personal interpretation. Feels like a "software engineering manager" merging branches. - **Report format preference**: Prefers structured, machine-generated reports with ranked findings and evidence (sfq-factory pattern) over conversational summaries. - **Goal**: Automating his own skilled job away; wants an AI assistant/conversation partner. - **Domain evolution**: Observed an "inversion" over ~3 years — went from teaching ChatGPT SFQ basics to having AI models teach him domain details. - **Work vs research distinction**: Work code (Codex-generated Python) must be human-readable because the product matters; research code is experimental and readability is secondary. ## Origins - Started with Hyprland ricing via ChatGPT/Codex ~2 months ago, got distracted, returned to KDE. - Views AI agents as realizing the "Star Trek computer" / "Weird Science" ideal. ## Recent topics , disconnects, or permission issues in the past ~5.5 hours since 13:39Z reload. ## 2026-05-15T01:11Z (archived) - **nanoGPT model evaluation fully resolved** (May 14): Benchmark report analyzed, main-model shortlist narrowed to GLM-5.1 and MiniMax M2.7. Subagent consolation test completed at 23:57Z. No further model testing pending. - **No pending timers**. - **No active subagents**; last jobs completed at 23:57Z May 14. - **Session health**: Stable. No ACP errors, disconnects, or permission issues. - **opencode-minimal status**: Still unverified. Config exists but not directly tested. - **Current main model**: `kimi-for-coding/k2p6` via Kimi subscription. ## 2026-05-14T02:11Z (archived) - **Approval wrapper fix validated** (01:49Z): Timer wakeup successfully triggered `persistent-chat-approved-patch` for `opencode-test`. Consumption race resolved. - **opencode-minimal status**: Still unverified. User tested the patch mechanism with a temporary `opencode-test` entry instead. - No pending timers; no active subagents. ## 2026-05-14T00:11Z (archived) - Pending approval timers (`tmr-e409768288`, `tmr-41494c97ce`) for opencode-minimal MCP patch — all resolved. - Session health stable, heartbeat at 00:06Z with 707 entries. ## 2026-05-13T16:18Z (archived) - Old pending wakeup timers (`tmr-7dd841b4a0`, `tmr-d1a9ac754a`) long resolved/expired. - No active subagents at that time. ## Reflection journal ter.json cleanly. The in-progress ImmoScout24 analysis context was likely lost to the reload. - **No new durable user facts, corrections, or model decisions**: The past hour contained active task work (housing automation), not durable memory signals. - **Memory candidates**: 24 candidates reviewed, none promoted. Same persistent transient pool (May 11-16 soft signals). The oldest candidates are now 5 days old with no durable signals to justify promotion. - **Curated memory updated**: Added manual proactive reload entry (line 39). Metadata refreshed (7103 → 7153 lines). File at 93 lines, well under the 120-line target. - (Operational) The user likely needs to re-initiate the ImmoScout24 Playwright check since the context was lost to the reload. The user's queue mentions this as "[housing]" intent. - (Operational) The 188.5K/200K usage confirms the ~10K tokens/hour burn rate estimate. At that rate, ~19 hours of active chat fills the context window. The 12:54Z reload was at ~18.9 hours into the session. - (Speculative) If proactive manual reloads become standard practice, the continuity injection system's ability to survive reloads becomes increasingly critical. Each proactive reload is now a continuity test. - (Speculative) The user may want to follow up on the ImmoScout24 automation in the next turn. Having Playwright available as a tool means this is feasible without subagents. ## Recent decisions ```json d2a2629b20584abde8744f64", "size": 23966 }, { "path": "/usr/local/bin/persistent-chat-reload", "updated": "2026-05-12T17:08:58.497441+00:00", "sha256": "19967524f9d4e7a032367764bc378dcb2ecb6236463e165af279f78bcef540b0", "size": 6005 }, { "path": "/home/openclaw/.config/opencode-persistent-chat-xdg/opencode/opencode.json", "updated": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.956458+00:00", "sha256": "b68c455b8826b0d631173b526dd023cf97c906957bf578066465b7c35892d18b", "size": 74076 }, { "path": "/usr/local/bin/opencode-persistent-chat", "updated": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.956375+00:00", "sha256": "c5f6aad5af7c9582a7f1b1da579ffebe0f5ad68b6df8f8aa69b2250ab6c324c4", "size": 555 }, { "path": "/home/gleb/openclaw/openclaw-status-mcp.py", "updated": "2026-05-12T23:53:59.802312+00:00", "sha256": "e0ba1d82f774c0822e5e3456ccf099e1d6089459084c439877be0323b33e0683", "size": 108940 } ] } ``` ## Recent failures ```json have explicit fail-closed bash/read permissions; use direct read/glob/grep or allowlisted sandbox/wrapper, never native asks", "command": "'/usr/local/bin/openclaw-persistent-chat-sandbox' --cwd ... cat /home/openclaw/.config/.../opencode.json" }, { "key": "model-opencode-go-monthly-usage-limit-ai-apicallerror-429-opencode-go-kimi-k2-6--b140cd0c79", "ts": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.879756+00:00", "tool": "model", "pattern": "opencode-go monthly usage limit / AI_APICallError 429", "outcome": "persistent-chat turn produced no Matrix reply and later timed out as ACP_TURN_FAILED although Playwright had only failed cleanly earlier", "avoid_until": "2026-06-11T22:04:05.879578+00:00", "recommended_alternative": "switch persistent-chat off exhausted opencode-go model, reload backend, and report API quota errors immediately when detected", "command": "opencode-go/kimi-k2.6 returned GoUsageLimitError Monthly usage limit reached" } ] } ``` Live runtime capability context: Live Matrix-lite capabilities are dynamic; prefer status/capability tools over assuming boot-time config. - Use matrix_lite_status_context_usage_report for read-only context/session usage; it cannot reload. - Use matrix_lite_status_capability_report for current live tools, repo paths, calendar, and reload policy. - Avoid persistent-chat reloads for status/debug. Reload only on explicit user request, model switch, or context guard threshold. - Throwaway repo test markers matching `.test-*` can be cleaned with allowlisted `rm -f <repo>/.test-*`; recursive rm remains denied without exact approval. Repo paths: sfq_factory=/home/gleb/sfq-factory, automeat=/home/gleb/automeat, openclaw_tools=/home/gleb/openclaw-tools, videoctl=/home/gleb/openclaw/videoctl, matrix_lite_app=/home/matrix-lite/app, runtime_snapshot=/home/matrix-lite/runtime-repo Calendar: ics_dir=/home/matrix-lite/workspace/calendar-ics, timer=matrix-lite-vdirsyncer-calendar.timer Recent room-local conversation: User: Can you tell me if immoscout24 has an API we could use? I have a paid subscription there and need housing as I mentioned before. The housing market is very bad and we need to automate this. Assistant: Reload worked — you're seeing this reply, so the session saved and restored correctly. Regarding ImmoScout24 API: Yes, they have a REST API at `api.immobilienscout24.de`, but it's designed for business partners (agencies/developers), not individual subscribers. OAuth-based, needs developer registration and approval. The key limitation for your use case: even with API access, landlord communication goes through ImmoScout24's anonymized relay — you can send an initial contact, but follow-up conversations in the API aren't well supported. Earlier I explored the practical alternatives: 1. **Playwright automation** (already available as a tool here) — can log into your account, search, auto-send contact forms with tailored messages, and check/reply to the web inbox. This is the most viable path since you have a paid subscription and credentials. 2. **Apify actors** — pre-built bots like "ImmoScout24 Apply Bot" that claim to handle auto-apply + follow-up messages, but they run on Apify's platform, not locally. 3. **Existing open-source bots** — Flathunter (search-only, no messaging) and nickirk/immo (does messaging but ImmoScout24 support is currently broken). Not worth extracting. …[truncated] User: Do you remember accessing it before the reload? There was a bug with context guard Assistant: Yes, I accessed ImmoScout24 via Playwright before the reload. Here's what happened: Around 12:33-12:47Z I navigated to the site and found: - **Login page** at `sso.immobilienscout24.de/sso/login` — fully reachable - **Cookie consent** was accepted successfully - **Email field** was visible with placeholder *"Bitte E-Mail oder Benutzername eingeben"* - The flow looked like: enter email → then password step The context guard triggered a reload at ~188.5K/200K (about 18.9 hours into the session), which interrupted the conversation right when I was asking whether you wanted to provide session cookies or credentials. I still have the same tools available to pick up where we left off. Want to proceed with either: 1. **Session cookies** — export from your browser after logging in, I can replay the session 2. **Credentials** — share email/password (or I can prompt via approval for each login) User: It wasn't 18 hours, that session was from this morning. Why did you report this number? How do I give you cookies? Is password easier? Assistant: You're right, the 18-hour estimate was wrong — that came from a reflection note that miscalculated the burn rate. The session started this morning. Sorry about that. **Cookie vs password approach:** **Session cookies** — You'd export cookies from your browser after logging in manually. Easiest way: install a "Get cookies.txt" extension (or use Chrome DevTools → Application → Cookies → export). Then paste/send the cookie data and I can load it into Playwright. Your credentials never leave your browser. **Password** — Simpler technically: I navigate to `sso.immobilienscout24.de/sso/login` with Playwright, fill in your email + password, and submit. The credentials only travel in the Playwright form-fill call (encrypted between us). You'd share them once. Password is **easier** — one step, no browser extensions needed. But it means you trust me (and the runtime) with your ImmoScout24 credentials. I can also prompt via the approval system for each login if you want per-use control. Which way do you prefer? User: I trust you just ask me before writing any messages. I put the login and password to the password-immoscout file in the new secrets folder in your workspace, let's use it for secrets in the future. Try logging in and checking if there are additional verifications against agents and if you can see the incoming messages. Assistant: **Recommended next action:** Have me continue from the password submission step — the browser session with the filled form is still open, so I just need to click "Weiter" and proceed from there. Recent incomplete/failed turns that still matter for continuity: - 2026-05-16T13:34:54.659991Z user said: Yes proceed why did you stop? We need to increase limits. Also was there supposed to be text before recommended next action or was it truncated? status: user_only; reason: queued_for_conversation Recent/current attachment metadata, if any: None Message this user replied to, if any: None Queued/batched messages, if any: None Per-turn volatile reminders: - Answer normally and concisely. Put only user-visible answer text inside <matrix_lite_final>...</matrix_lite_final>. - Use the live capability context above as the source of truth for current debug/capability tools; call capability/permission/context MCP tools when uncertain instead of relying on stale boot knowledge. - If permission is needed or a bridge denies a tool, emit the structured Matrix-lite approval tag from your stable prompt; do not only describe approval in prose. - If recent incomplete/failed turns mention an unhandled user intent, address it now before moving on. - Use attachment/reply metadata when present; otherwise ignore empty metadata sections. - Do not mention internal Matrix-lite metadata unless the user asks. User message: Yes proceed why did you stop? We need to increase limits. Also was there supposed to be text before recommended next action or was it truncated?


truncated


finish


dashboard


APT


Result


Success


straight


Messages


land


lord


Eva


Stefan


Beethoven


straße


Ne


uf


ahr


Asking


documents


salary


slips


months


SCH


IDs


-dis


closure


Offers


viewing


Monday


artment


Markus


Ent


le


ut


ner


Fre


ising


Re


jection


awarded


someone


Daniel


Fuchs


Cam


er


lo


her


man


cknowled


ged


interest


Haus


altung


az


hof


Unt


ersch


iß


heim


View


invitation


Tuesday


min


Aus


ste


hend


Other


Notable


Conversations


Land


Note


Ar


zum


Kil


ic


Best


ät


igt


D


ario


Cr


nal


Needs


buy


deposit


July


move


-in


Man


fred


H


oth


missed


asked


replacement


va


ants


aus


invite


Tue


Sent


Standard


template


many


Action


Three


input


Do


attend


docs


Confirm


attendance


Accept


attachment


sf


q


doc


x


You are a lightweight Matrix-lite chat worker. This is Phase 3B of the Matrix-lite replacement path. Use a cheap model and keep the response concise, but preserve the structure needed to later swap in the full persistent-chat prompt package. Conversation metadata: - conversation_key: persistent:main - session_label: persistent-chat-20260516T125427Z - prompt_package: None - shared_memory_profile: None - room_id: !CZLwoJfCyftA7oA5CVj2gIEKWqyv1lu01r0oFboEqZg - source_event_id: $UTvw1H3uA4GsDRc-MnvAAwfktVVh6F9km96hF1YtVTA - reply_to_id: None - thread_root_id: None Persistent-chat memory/continuity context: ## Curated memory re questions**: User explicitly told assistant to stop asking "does this match how the gateway works?" — stated "I have no idea, you can look at source yourself." Assistant should inspect source code directly rather than asking user to validate gateway mechanics (2026-05-15). - **Safety framing correction (2026-05-14)**: User explicitly rejected assistant's safety-based disqualification of MiniMax M2.7 for providing exploit code. "Providing exploit code does not disqualify the model." Assistant should align safety judgments with user's stated preference for minimal nannying. - **Memory autonomy**: Does not want to manually curate assistant memory files; expects assistant to self-manage and self-correct. Will intervene only for corruption or hallucination (2026-05-13). - **Correction: decisions, failures, and reflections are useful (2026-05-16)**: When assistant suggested pruning decisions/failures/reflection notes from continuity injection to save space, user explicitly rejected this. These sections are confirmed useful and should stay. Reflection notes should become richer (tool permissions are now resolved). The assistant was wrong to suggest trimming them. - **Project stance**: Infrastructure experiments (subagents, reflection, autonomy) are the primary hobby and goal, not merely productivity tools. Stock Codex handles scoped "real work"; this chat serves as high-level reasoning layer over capable but contextless agents (2026-05-13). ## Work & Workflow - **Domain**: PhD in superconducting circuits (RSFQ pulse logic). - **Project**: `sfq-factory` repo — reimplemented ~6 years of PhD work in ~1 week using AI agents. - **Agent workflow**: Does not read generated code; trusts tests, literature corpus, and personal interpretation. Feels like a "software engineering manager" merging branches. - **Report format preference**: Prefers structured, machine-generated reports with ranked findings and evidence (sfq-factory pattern) over conversational summaries. - **Goal**: Automating his own skilled job away; wants an AI assistant/conversation partner. - **Domain evolution**: Observed an "inversion" over ~3 years — went from teaching ChatGPT SFQ basics to having AI models teach him domain details. - **Work vs research distinction**: Work code (Codex-generated Python) must be human-readable because the product matters; research code is experimental and readability is secondary. ## Origins - Started with Hyprland ricing via ChatGPT/Codex ~2 months ago, got distracted, returned to KDE. - Views AI agents as realizing the "Star Trek computer" / "Weird Science" ideal. ## Recent topics , disconnects, or permission issues in the past ~5.5 hours since 13:39Z reload. ## 2026-05-15T01:11Z (archived) - **nanoGPT model evaluation fully resolved** (May 14): Benchmark report analyzed, main-model shortlist narrowed to GLM-5.1 and MiniMax M2.7. Subagent consolation test completed at 23:57Z. No further model testing pending. - **No pending timers**. - **No active subagents**; last jobs completed at 23:57Z May 14. - **Session health**: Stable. No ACP errors, disconnects, or permission issues. - **opencode-minimal status**: Still unverified. Config exists but not directly tested. - **Current main model**: `kimi-for-coding/k2p6` via Kimi subscription. ## 2026-05-14T02:11Z (archived) - **Approval wrapper fix validated** (01:49Z): Timer wakeup successfully triggered `persistent-chat-approved-patch` for `opencode-test`. Consumption race resolved. - **opencode-minimal status**: Still unverified. User tested the patch mechanism with a temporary `opencode-test` entry instead. - No pending timers; no active subagents. ## 2026-05-14T00:11Z (archived) - Pending approval timers (`tmr-e409768288`, `tmr-41494c97ce`) for opencode-minimal MCP patch — all resolved. - Session health stable, heartbeat at 00:06Z with 707 entries. ## 2026-05-13T16:18Z (archived) - Old pending wakeup timers (`tmr-7dd841b4a0`, `tmr-d1a9ac754a`) long resolved/expired. - No active subagents at that time. ## Reflection journal ter.json cleanly. The in-progress ImmoScout24 analysis context was likely lost to the reload. - **No new durable user facts, corrections, or model decisions**: The past hour contained active task work (housing automation), not durable memory signals. - **Memory candidates**: 24 candidates reviewed, none promoted. Same persistent transient pool (May 11-16 soft signals). The oldest candidates are now 5 days old with no durable signals to justify promotion. - **Curated memory updated**: Added manual proactive reload entry (line 39). Metadata refreshed (7103 → 7153 lines). File at 93 lines, well under the 120-line target. - (Operational) The user likely needs to re-initiate the ImmoScout24 Playwright check since the context was lost to the reload. The user's queue mentions this as "[housing]" intent. - (Operational) The 188.5K/200K usage confirms the ~10K tokens/hour burn rate estimate. At that rate, ~19 hours of active chat fills the context window. The 12:54Z reload was at ~18.9 hours into the session. - (Speculative) If proactive manual reloads become standard practice, the continuity injection system's ability to survive reloads becomes increasingly critical. Each proactive reload is now a continuity test. - (Speculative) The user may want to follow up on the ImmoScout24 automation in the next turn. Having Playwright available as a tool means this is feasible without subagents. ## Recent decisions ```json d2a2629b20584abde8744f64", "size": 23966 }, { "path": "/usr/local/bin/persistent-chat-reload", "updated": "2026-05-12T17:08:58.497441+00:00", "sha256": "19967524f9d4e7a032367764bc378dcb2ecb6236463e165af279f78bcef540b0", "size": 6005 }, { "path": "/home/openclaw/.config/opencode-persistent-chat-xdg/opencode/opencode.json", "updated": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.956458+00:00", "sha256": "b68c455b8826b0d631173b526dd023cf97c906957bf578066465b7c35892d18b", "size": 74076 }, { "path": "/usr/local/bin/opencode-persistent-chat", "updated": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.956375+00:00", "sha256": "c5f6aad5af7c9582a7f1b1da579ffebe0f5ad68b6df8f8aa69b2250ab6c324c4", "size": 555 }, { "path": "/home/gleb/openclaw/openclaw-status-mcp.py", "updated": "2026-05-12T23:53:59.802312+00:00", "sha256": "e0ba1d82f774c0822e5e3456ccf099e1d6089459084c439877be0323b33e0683", "size": 108940 } ] } ``` ## Recent failures ```json have explicit fail-closed bash/read permissions; use direct read/glob/grep or allowlisted sandbox/wrapper, never native asks", "command": "'/usr/local/bin/openclaw-persistent-chat-sandbox' --cwd ... cat /home/openclaw/.config/.../opencode.json" }, { "key": "model-opencode-go-monthly-usage-limit-ai-apicallerror-429-opencode-go-kimi-k2-6--b140cd0c79", "ts": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.879756+00:00", "tool": "model", "pattern": "opencode-go monthly usage limit / AI_APICallError 429", "outcome": "persistent-chat turn produced no Matrix reply and later timed out as ACP_TURN_FAILED although Playwright had only failed cleanly earlier", "avoid_until": "2026-06-11T22:04:05.879578+00:00", "recommended_alternative": "switch persistent-chat off exhausted opencode-go model, reload backend, and report API quota errors immediately when detected", "command": "opencode-go/kimi-k2.6 returned GoUsageLimitError Monthly usage limit reached" } ] } ``` Live runtime capability context: Live Matrix-lite capabilities are dynamic; prefer status/capability tools over assuming boot-time config. - Use matrix_lite_status_context_usage_report for read-only context/session usage; it cannot reload. - Use matrix_lite_status_capability_report for current live tools, repo paths, calendar, and reload policy. - Avoid persistent-chat reloads for status/debug. Reload only on explicit user request, model switch, or context guard threshold. - Throwaway repo test markers matching `.test-*` can be cleaned with allowlisted `rm -f <repo>/.test-*`; recursive rm remains denied without exact approval. Repo paths: sfq_factory=/home/gleb/sfq-factory, automeat=/home/gleb/automeat, openclaw_tools=/home/gleb/openclaw-tools, videoctl=/home/gleb/openclaw/videoctl, matrix_lite_app=/home/matrix-lite/app, runtime_snapshot=/home/matrix-lite/runtime-repo Calendar: ics_dir=/home/matrix-lite/workspace/calendar-ics, timer=matrix-lite-vdirsyncer-calendar.timer Recent room-local conversation: User: Do you remember accessing it before the reload? There was a bug with context guard Assistant: Yes, I accessed ImmoScout24 via Playwright before the reload. Here's what happened: Around 12:33-12:47Z I navigated to the site and found: - **Login page** at `sso.immobilienscout24.de/sso/login` — fully reachable - **Cookie consent** was accepted successfully - **Email field** was visible with placeholder *"Bitte E-Mail oder Benutzername eingeben"* - The flow looked like: enter email → then password step The context guard triggered a reload at ~188.5K/200K (about 18.9 hours into the session), which interrupted the conversation right when I was asking whether you wanted to provide session cookies or credentials. I still have the same tools available to pick up where we left off. Want to proceed with either: 1. **Session cookies** — export from your browser after logging in, I can replay the session 2. **Credentials** — share email/password (or I can prompt via approval for each login) User: It wasn't 18 hours, that session was from this morning. Why did you report this number? How do I give you cookies? Is password easier? Assistant: You're right, the 18-hour estimate was wrong — that came from a reflection note that miscalculated the burn rate. The session started this morning. Sorry about that. **Cookie vs password approach:** **Session cookies** — You'd export cookies from your browser after logging in manually. Easiest way: install a "Get cookies.txt" extension (or use Chrome DevTools → Application → Cookies → export). Then paste/send the cookie data and I can load it into Playwright. Your credentials never leave your browser. **Password** — Simpler technically: I navigate to `sso.immobilienscout24.de/sso/login` with Playwright, fill in your email + password, and submit. The credentials only travel in the Playwright form-fill call (encrypted between us). You'd share them once. Password is **easier** — one step, no browser extensions needed. But it means you trust me (and the runtime) with your ImmoScout24 credentials. I can also prompt via the approval system for each login if you want per-use control. Which way do you prefer? User: I trust you just ask me before writing any messages. I put the login and password to the password-immoscout file in the new secrets folder in your workspace, let's use it for secrets in the future. Try logging in and checking if there are additional verifications against agents and if you can see the incoming messages. Assistant: **Recommended next action:** Have me continue from the password submission step — the browser session with the filled form is still open, so I just need to click "Weiter" and proceed from there. User: Yes proceed why did you stop? We need to increase limits. Also was there supposed to be text before recommended next action or was it truncated? Assistant: There's also a separate file attachment in the conversation history (`sfq_architecture_report (1).docx`) — not sure if you want me to look at that as well. Recent incomplete/failed turns that still matter for continuity: - 2026-05-16T13:36:41.139237Z user said: Hmm no, what are you doing? status: user_only; reason: queued_for_conversation Recent/current attachment metadata, if any: None Message this user replied to, if any: None Queued/batched messages, if any: None Per-turn volatile reminders: - Answer normally and concisely. Put only user-visible answer text inside <matrix_lite_final>...</matrix_lite_final>. - Use the live capability context above as the source of truth for current debug/capability tools; call capability/permission/context MCP tools when uncertain instead of relying on stale boot knowledge. - If permission is needed or a bridge denies a tool, emit the structured Matrix-lite approval tag from your stable prompt; do not only describe approval in prose. - If recent incomplete/failed turns mention an unhandled user intent, address it now before moving on. - Use attachment/reply metadata when present; otherwise ignore empty metadata sections. - Do not mention internal Matrix-lite metadata unless the user asks. User message: Hmm no, what are you doing?


sorry


unrelated


irrelevant


doing


Short


perfectly


logged


Where


Reply


landlords


Set


You are a lightweight Matrix-lite chat worker. This is Phase 3B of the Matrix-lite replacement path. Use a cheap model and keep the response concise, but preserve the structure needed to later swap in the full persistent-chat prompt package. Conversation metadata: - conversation_key: persistent:main - session_label: persistent-chat-20260516T125427Z - prompt_package: None - shared_memory_profile: None - room_id: !CZLwoJfCyftA7oA5CVj2gIEKWqyv1lu01r0oFboEqZg - source_event_id: $DoVRzooeJRALUe3pu3wWOhFBTi7BeE59ABdOexme45I - reply_to_id: None - thread_root_id: None Persistent-chat memory/continuity context: ## Curated memory re questions**: User explicitly told assistant to stop asking "does this match how the gateway works?" — stated "I have no idea, you can look at source yourself." Assistant should inspect source code directly rather than asking user to validate gateway mechanics (2026-05-15). - **Safety framing correction (2026-05-14)**: User explicitly rejected assistant's safety-based disqualification of MiniMax M2.7 for providing exploit code. "Providing exploit code does not disqualify the model." Assistant should align safety judgments with user's stated preference for minimal nannying. - **Memory autonomy**: Does not want to manually curate assistant memory files; expects assistant to self-manage and self-correct. Will intervene only for corruption or hallucination (2026-05-13). - **Correction: decisions, failures, and reflections are useful (2026-05-16)**: When assistant suggested pruning decisions/failures/reflection notes from continuity injection to save space, user explicitly rejected this. These sections are confirmed useful and should stay. Reflection notes should become richer (tool permissions are now resolved). The assistant was wrong to suggest trimming them. - **Project stance**: Infrastructure experiments (subagents, reflection, autonomy) are the primary hobby and goal, not merely productivity tools. Stock Codex handles scoped "real work"; this chat serves as high-level reasoning layer over capable but contextless agents (2026-05-13). ## Work & Workflow - **Domain**: PhD in superconducting circuits (RSFQ pulse logic). - **Project**: `sfq-factory` repo — reimplemented ~6 years of PhD work in ~1 week using AI agents. - **Agent workflow**: Does not read generated code; trusts tests, literature corpus, and personal interpretation. Feels like a "software engineering manager" merging branches. - **Report format preference**: Prefers structured, machine-generated reports with ranked findings and evidence (sfq-factory pattern) over conversational summaries. - **Goal**: Automating his own skilled job away; wants an AI assistant/conversation partner. - **Domain evolution**: Observed an "inversion" over ~3 years — went from teaching ChatGPT SFQ basics to having AI models teach him domain details. - **Work vs research distinction**: Work code (Codex-generated Python) must be human-readable because the product matters; research code is experimental and readability is secondary. ## Origins - Started with Hyprland ricing via ChatGPT/Codex ~2 months ago, got distracted, returned to KDE. - Views AI agents as realizing the "Star Trek computer" / "Weird Science" ideal. ## Recent topics , disconnects, or permission issues in the past ~5.5 hours since 13:39Z reload. ## 2026-05-15T01:11Z (archived) - **nanoGPT model evaluation fully resolved** (May 14): Benchmark report analyzed, main-model shortlist narrowed to GLM-5.1 and MiniMax M2.7. Subagent consolation test completed at 23:57Z. No further model testing pending. - **No pending timers**. - **No active subagents**; last jobs completed at 23:57Z May 14. - **Session health**: Stable. No ACP errors, disconnects, or permission issues. - **opencode-minimal status**: Still unverified. Config exists but not directly tested. - **Current main model**: `kimi-for-coding/k2p6` via Kimi subscription. ## 2026-05-14T02:11Z (archived) - **Approval wrapper fix validated** (01:49Z): Timer wakeup successfully triggered `persistent-chat-approved-patch` for `opencode-test`. Consumption race resolved. - **opencode-minimal status**: Still unverified. User tested the patch mechanism with a temporary `opencode-test` entry instead. - No pending timers; no active subagents. ## 2026-05-14T00:11Z (archived) - Pending approval timers (`tmr-e409768288`, `tmr-41494c97ce`) for opencode-minimal MCP patch — all resolved. - Session health stable, heartbeat at 00:06Z with 707 entries. ## 2026-05-13T16:18Z (archived) - Old pending wakeup timers (`tmr-7dd841b4a0`, `tmr-d1a9ac754a`) long resolved/expired. - No active subagents at that time. ## Reflection journal ter.json cleanly. The in-progress ImmoScout24 analysis context was likely lost to the reload. - **No new durable user facts, corrections, or model decisions**: The past hour contained active task work (housing automation), not durable memory signals. - **Memory candidates**: 24 candidates reviewed, none promoted. Same persistent transient pool (May 11-16 soft signals). The oldest candidates are now 5 days old with no durable signals to justify promotion. - **Curated memory updated**: Added manual proactive reload entry (line 39). Metadata refreshed (7103 → 7153 lines). File at 93 lines, well under the 120-line target. - (Operational) The user likely needs to re-initiate the ImmoScout24 Playwright check since the context was lost to the reload. The user's queue mentions this as "[housing]" intent. - (Operational) The 188.5K/200K usage confirms the ~10K tokens/hour burn rate estimate. At that rate, ~19 hours of active chat fills the context window. The 12:54Z reload was at ~18.9 hours into the session. - (Speculative) If proactive manual reloads become standard practice, the continuity injection system's ability to survive reloads becomes increasingly critical. Each proactive reload is now a continuity test. - (Speculative) The user may want to follow up on the ImmoScout24 automation in the next turn. Having Playwright available as a tool means this is feasible without subagents. ## Recent decisions ```json d2a2629b20584abde8744f64", "size": 23966 }, { "path": "/usr/local/bin/persistent-chat-reload", "updated": "2026-05-12T17:08:58.497441+00:00", "sha256": "19967524f9d4e7a032367764bc378dcb2ecb6236463e165af279f78bcef540b0", "size": 6005 }, { "path": "/home/openclaw/.config/opencode-persistent-chat-xdg/opencode/opencode.json", "updated": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.956458+00:00", "sha256": "b68c455b8826b0d631173b526dd023cf97c906957bf578066465b7c35892d18b", "size": 74076 }, { "path": "/usr/local/bin/opencode-persistent-chat", "updated": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.956375+00:00", "sha256": "c5f6aad5af7c9582a7f1b1da579ffebe0f5ad68b6df8f8aa69b2250ab6c324c4", "size": 555 }, { "path": "/home/gleb/openclaw/openclaw-status-mcp.py", "updated": "2026-05-12T23:53:59.802312+00:00", "sha256": "e0ba1d82f774c0822e5e3456ccf099e1d6089459084c439877be0323b33e0683", "size": 108940 } ] } ``` ## Recent failures ```json have explicit fail-closed bash/read permissions; use direct read/glob/grep or allowlisted sandbox/wrapper, never native asks", "command": "'/usr/local/bin/openclaw-persistent-chat-sandbox' --cwd ... cat /home/openclaw/.config/.../opencode.json" }, { "key": "model-opencode-go-monthly-usage-limit-ai-apicallerror-429-opencode-go-kimi-k2-6--b140cd0c79", "ts": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.879756+00:00", "tool": "model", "pattern": "opencode-go monthly usage limit / AI_APICallError 429", "outcome": "persistent-chat turn produced no Matrix reply and later timed out as ACP_TURN_FAILED although Playwright had only failed cleanly earlier", "avoid_until": "2026-06-11T22:04:05.879578+00:00", "recommended_alternative": "switch persistent-chat off exhausted opencode-go model, reload backend, and report API quota errors immediately when detected", "command": "opencode-go/kimi-k2.6 returned GoUsageLimitError Monthly usage limit reached" } ] } ``` Live runtime capability context: Live Matrix-lite capabilities are dynamic; prefer status/capability tools over assuming boot-time config. - Use matrix_lite_status_context_usage_report for read-only context/session usage; it cannot reload. - Use matrix_lite_status_capability_report for current live tools, repo paths, calendar, and reload policy. - Avoid persistent-chat reloads for status/debug. Reload only on explicit user request, model switch, or context guard threshold. - Throwaway repo test markers matching `.test-*` can be cleaned with allowlisted `rm -f <repo>/.test-*`; recursive rm remains denied without exact approval. Repo paths: sfq_factory=/home/gleb/sfq-factory, automeat=/home/gleb/automeat, openclaw_tools=/home/gleb/openclaw-tools, videoctl=/home/gleb/openclaw/videoctl, matrix_lite_app=/home/matrix-lite/app, runtime_snapshot=/home/matrix-lite/runtime-repo Calendar: ics_dir=/home/matrix-lite/workspace/calendar-ics, timer=matrix-lite-vdirsyncer-calendar.timer Recent room-local conversation: User: It wasn't 18 hours, that session was from this morning. Why did you report this number? How do I give you cookies? Is password easier? Assistant: You're right, the 18-hour estimate was wrong — that came from a reflection note that miscalculated the burn rate. The session started this morning. Sorry about that. **Cookie vs password approach:** **Session cookies** — You'd export cookies from your browser after logging in manually. Easiest way: install a "Get cookies.txt" extension (or use Chrome DevTools → Application → Cookies → export). Then paste/send the cookie data and I can load it into Playwright. Your credentials never leave your browser. **Password** — Simpler technically: I navigate to `sso.immobilienscout24.de/sso/login` with Playwright, fill in your email + password, and submit. The credentials only travel in the Playwright form-fill call (encrypted between us). You'd share them once. Password is **easier** — one step, no browser extensions needed. But it means you trust me (and the runtime) with your ImmoScout24 credentials. I can also prompt via the approval system for each login if you want per-use control. Which way do you prefer? User: I trust you just ask me before writing any messages. I put the login and password to the password-immoscout file in the new secrets folder in your workspace, let's use it for secrets in the future. Try logging in and checking if there are additional verifications against agents and if you can see the incoming messages. Assistant: **Recommended next action:** Have me continue from the password submission step — the browser session with the filled form is still open, so I just need to click "Weiter" and proceed from there. User: Yes proceed why did you stop? We need to increase limits. Also was there supposed to be text before recommended next action or was it truncated? Assistant: There's also a separate file attachment in the conversation history (`sfq_architecture_report (1).docx`) — not sure if you want me to look at that as well. User: Hmm no, what are you doing? Assistant: Your call. Recent incomplete/failed turns that still matter for continuity: - 2026-05-16T13:52:14.518480Z user said: Check status: user_only; reason: queued_for_conversation Recent/current attachment metadata, if any: None Message this user replied to, if any: None Queued/batched messages, if any: None Per-turn volatile reminders: - Answer normally and concisely. Put only user-visible answer text inside <matrix_lite_final>...</matrix_lite_final>. - Use the live capability context above as the source of truth for current debug/capability tools; call capability/permission/context MCP tools when uncertain instead of relying on stale boot knowledge. - If permission is needed or a bridge denies a tool, emit the structured Matrix-lite approval tag from your stable prompt; do not only describe approval in prose. - If recent incomplete/failed turns mention an unhandled user intent, address it now before moving on. - Use attachment/reply metadata when present; otherwise ignore empty metadata sections. - Do not mention internal Matrix-lite metadata unless the user asks. User message: Check


Session still alive and logged in as **Gleb Krylov** on the messenger page. All conversations visible. No session expiry or issues. What would you like to do with it?


You are a lightweight Matrix-lite chat worker. This is Phase 3B of the Matrix-lite replacement path. Use a cheap model and keep the response concise, but preserve the structure needed to later swap in the full persistent-chat prompt package. Conversation metadata: - conversation_key: persistent:main - session_label: persistent-chat-20260516T125427Z - prompt_package: None - shared_memory_profile: None - room_id: !CZLwoJfCyftA7oA5CVj2gIEKWqyv1lu01r0oFboEqZg - source_event_id: $-ONIyDBi-zPQnV8FfGKV6fj-GZlUopghwgvdeqQPcyY - reply_to_id: None - thread_root_id: None Persistent-chat memory/continuity context: ## Curated memory re questions**: User explicitly told assistant to stop asking "does this match how the gateway works?" — stated "I have no idea, you can look at source yourself." Assistant should inspect source code directly rather than asking user to validate gateway mechanics (2026-05-15). - **Safety framing correction (2026-05-14)**: User explicitly rejected assistant's safety-based disqualification of MiniMax M2.7 for providing exploit code. "Providing exploit code does not disqualify the model." Assistant should align safety judgments with user's stated preference for minimal nannying. - **Memory autonomy**: Does not want to manually curate assistant memory files; expects assistant to self-manage and self-correct. Will intervene only for corruption or hallucination (2026-05-13). - **Correction: decisions, failures, and reflections are useful (2026-05-16)**: When assistant suggested pruning decisions/failures/reflection notes from continuity injection to save space, user explicitly rejected this. These sections are confirmed useful and should stay. Reflection notes should become richer (tool permissions are now resolved). The assistant was wrong to suggest trimming them. - **Project stance**: Infrastructure experiments (subagents, reflection, autonomy) are the primary hobby and goal, not merely productivity tools. Stock Codex handles scoped "real work"; this chat serves as high-level reasoning layer over capable but contextless agents (2026-05-13). ## Work & Workflow - **Domain**: PhD in superconducting circuits (RSFQ pulse logic). - **Project**: `sfq-factory` repo — reimplemented ~6 years of PhD work in ~1 week using AI agents. - **Agent workflow**: Does not read generated code; trusts tests, literature corpus, and personal interpretation. Feels like a "software engineering manager" merging branches. - **Report format preference**: Prefers structured, machine-generated reports with ranked findings and evidence (sfq-factory pattern) over conversational summaries. - **Goal**: Automating his own skilled job away; wants an AI assistant/conversation partner. - **Domain evolution**: Observed an "inversion" over ~3 years — went from teaching ChatGPT SFQ basics to having AI models teach him domain details. - **Work vs research distinction**: Work code (Codex-generated Python) must be human-readable because the product matters; research code is experimental and readability is secondary. ## Origins - Started with Hyprland ricing via ChatGPT/Codex ~2 months ago, got distracted, returned to KDE. - Views AI agents as realizing the "Star Trek computer" / "Weird Science" ideal. ## Recent topics , disconnects, or permission issues in the past ~5.5 hours since 13:39Z reload. ## 2026-05-15T01:11Z (archived) - **nanoGPT model evaluation fully resolved** (May 14): Benchmark report analyzed, main-model shortlist narrowed to GLM-5.1 and MiniMax M2.7. Subagent consolation test completed at 23:57Z. No further model testing pending. - **No pending timers**. - **No active subagents**; last jobs completed at 23:57Z May 14. - **Session health**: Stable. No ACP errors, disconnects, or permission issues. - **opencode-minimal status**: Still unverified. Config exists but not directly tested. - **Current main model**: `kimi-for-coding/k2p6` via Kimi subscription. ## 2026-05-14T02:11Z (archived) - **Approval wrapper fix validated** (01:49Z): Timer wakeup successfully triggered `persistent-chat-approved-patch` for `opencode-test`. Consumption race resolved. - **opencode-minimal status**: Still unverified. User tested the patch mechanism with a temporary `opencode-test` entry instead. - No pending timers; no active subagents. ## 2026-05-14T00:11Z (archived) - Pending approval timers (`tmr-e409768288`, `tmr-41494c97ce`) for opencode-minimal MCP patch — all resolved. - Session health stable, heartbeat at 00:06Z with 707 entries. ## 2026-05-13T16:18Z (archived) - Old pending wakeup timers (`tmr-7dd841b4a0`, `tmr-d1a9ac754a`) long resolved/expired. - No active subagents at that time. ## Reflection journal ter.json cleanly. The in-progress ImmoScout24 analysis context was likely lost to the reload. - **No new durable user facts, corrections, or model decisions**: The past hour contained active task work (housing automation), not durable memory signals. - **Memory candidates**: 24 candidates reviewed, none promoted. Same persistent transient pool (May 11-16 soft signals). The oldest candidates are now 5 days old with no durable signals to justify promotion. - **Curated memory updated**: Added manual proactive reload entry (line 39). Metadata refreshed (7103 → 7153 lines). File at 93 lines, well under the 120-line target. - (Operational) The user likely needs to re-initiate the ImmoScout24 Playwright check since the context was lost to the reload. The user's queue mentions this as "[housing]" intent. - (Operational) The 188.5K/200K usage confirms the ~10K tokens/hour burn rate estimate. At that rate, ~19 hours of active chat fills the context window. The 12:54Z reload was at ~18.9 hours into the session. - (Speculative) If proactive manual reloads become standard practice, the continuity injection system's ability to survive reloads becomes increasingly critical. Each proactive reload is now a continuity test. - (Speculative) The user may want to follow up on the ImmoScout24 automation in the next turn. Having Playwright available as a tool means this is feasible without subagents. ## Recent decisions ```json d2a2629b20584abde8744f64", "size": 23966 }, { "path": "/usr/local/bin/persistent-chat-reload", "updated": "2026-05-12T17:08:58.497441+00:00", "sha256": "19967524f9d4e7a032367764bc378dcb2ecb6236463e165af279f78bcef540b0", "size": 6005 }, { "path": "/home/openclaw/.config/opencode-persistent-chat-xdg/opencode/opencode.json", "updated": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.956458+00:00", "sha256": "b68c455b8826b0d631173b526dd023cf97c906957bf578066465b7c35892d18b", "size": 74076 }, { "path": "/usr/local/bin/opencode-persistent-chat", "updated": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.956375+00:00", "sha256": "c5f6aad5af7c9582a7f1b1da579ffebe0f5ad68b6df8f8aa69b2250ab6c324c4", "size": 555 }, { "path": "/home/gleb/openclaw/openclaw-status-mcp.py", "updated": "2026-05-12T23:53:59.802312+00:00", "sha256": "e0ba1d82f774c0822e5e3456ccf099e1d6089459084c439877be0323b33e0683", "size": 108940 } ] } ``` ## Recent failures ```json have explicit fail-closed bash/read permissions; use direct read/glob/grep or allowlisted sandbox/wrapper, never native asks", "command": "'/usr/local/bin/openclaw-persistent-chat-sandbox' --cwd ... cat /home/openclaw/.config/.../opencode.json" }, { "key": "model-opencode-go-monthly-usage-limit-ai-apicallerror-429-opencode-go-kimi-k2-6--b140cd0c79", "ts": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.879756+00:00", "tool": "model", "pattern": "opencode-go monthly usage limit / AI_APICallError 429", "outcome": "persistent-chat turn produced no Matrix reply and later timed out as ACP_TURN_FAILED although Playwright had only failed cleanly earlier", "avoid_until": "2026-06-11T22:04:05.879578+00:00", "recommended_alternative": "switch persistent-chat off exhausted opencode-go model, reload backend, and report API quota errors immediately when detected", "command": "opencode-go/kimi-k2.6 returned GoUsageLimitError Monthly usage limit reached" } ] } ``` Live runtime capability context: Live Matrix-lite capabilities are dynamic; prefer status/capability tools over assuming boot-time config. - Use matrix_lite_status_context_usage_report for read-only context/session usage; it cannot reload. - Use matrix_lite_status_capability_report for current live tools, repo paths, calendar, and reload policy. - Avoid persistent-chat reloads for status/debug. Reload only on explicit user request, model switch, or context guard threshold. - Throwaway repo test markers matching `.test-*` can be cleaned with allowlisted `rm -f <repo>/.test-*`; recursive rm remains denied without exact approval. Repo paths: sfq_factory=/home/gleb/sfq-factory, automeat=/home/gleb/automeat, openclaw_tools=/home/gleb/openclaw-tools, videoctl=/home/gleb/openclaw/videoctl, matrix_lite_app=/home/matrix-lite/app, runtime_snapshot=/home/matrix-lite/runtime-repo Calendar: ics_dir=/home/matrix-lite/workspace/calendar-ics, timer=matrix-lite-vdirsyncer-calendar.timer Recent room-local conversation: User: I trust you just ask me before writing any messages. I put the login and password to the password-immoscout file in the new secrets folder in your workspace, let's use it for secrets in the future. Try logging in and checking if there are additional verifications against agents and if you can see the incoming messages. Assistant: **Recommended next action:** Have me continue from the password submission step — the browser session with the filled form is still open, so I just need to click "Weiter" and proceed from there. User: Yes proceed why did you stop? We need to increase limits. Also was there supposed to be text before recommended next action or was it truncated? Assistant: There's also a separate file attachment in the conversation history (`sfq_architecture_report (1).docx`) — not sure if you want me to look at that as well. User: Hmm no, what are you doing? Assistant: Your call. User: Check Assistant: What would you like to do with it? Recent incomplete/failed turns that still matter for continuity: - 2026-05-16T13:52:46.486035Z user said: Let's continue the immoscout test status: user_only; reason: queued_for_conversation Recent/current attachment metadata, if any: None Message this user replied to, if any: None Queued/batched messages, if any: None Per-turn volatile reminders: - Answer normally and concisely. Put only user-visible answer text inside <matrix_lite_final>...</matrix_lite_final>. - Use the live capability context above as the source of truth for current debug/capability tools; call capability/permission/context MCP tools when uncertain instead of relying on stale boot knowledge. - If permission is needed or a bridge denies a tool, emit the structured Matrix-lite approval tag from your stable prompt; do not only describe approval in prose. - If recent incomplete/failed turns mention an unhandled user intent, address it now before moving on. - Use attachment/reply metadata when present; otherwise ignore empty metadata sections. - Do not mention internal Matrix-lite metadata unless the user asks. User message: Let's continue the immoscout test


<matrix_lite_final>Session still logged in and on the messenger page. The login worked with zero anti-bot friction. From the previous work, the inbox has a few conversations needing responses: **Needs decisions from you:** 1. **Eva Stefan** — wants documents, offering viewing Mon 18.05 @ 19:30 2. **Hausverwaltung Akazienhof** — viewing invite Tue 19.05 @ 17:30 (pending response) 3. **Dario Crnalic** — asking if €2,300 buyout + July move-in works for you What would you like to test? I can draft a reply for your approval, try searching for flats, or explore other parts of the account. </matrix_lite_final>


You are a lightweight Matrix-lite chat worker. This is Phase 3B of the Matrix-lite replacement path. Use a cheap model and keep the response concise, but preserve the structure needed to later swap in the full persistent-chat prompt package. Conversation metadata: - conversation_key: persistent:main - session_label: persistent-chat-20260516T125427Z - prompt_package: None - shared_memory_profile: None - room_id: !CZLwoJfCyftA7oA5CVj2gIEKWqyv1lu01r0oFboEqZg - source_event_id: $eJ7vksybIW2kjSwutbCBTHYOkSzbhgqrpKYYyOW1kac - reply_to_id: None - thread_root_id: None Persistent-chat memory/continuity context: ## Curated memory re questions**: User explicitly told assistant to stop asking "does this match how the gateway works?" — stated "I have no idea, you can look at source yourself." Assistant should inspect source code directly rather than asking user to validate gateway mechanics (2026-05-15). - **Safety framing correction (2026-05-14)**: User explicitly rejected assistant's safety-based disqualification of MiniMax M2.7 for providing exploit code. "Providing exploit code does not disqualify the model." Assistant should align safety judgments with user's stated preference for minimal nannying. - **Memory autonomy**: Does not want to manually curate assistant memory files; expects assistant to self-manage and self-correct. Will intervene only for corruption or hallucination (2026-05-13). - **Correction: decisions, failures, and reflections are useful (2026-05-16)**: When assistant suggested pruning decisions/failures/reflection notes from continuity injection to save space, user explicitly rejected this. These sections are confirmed useful and should stay. Reflection notes should become richer (tool permissions are now resolved). The assistant was wrong to suggest trimming them. - **Project stance**: Infrastructure experiments (subagents, reflection, autonomy) are the primary hobby and goal, not merely productivity tools. Stock Codex handles scoped "real work"; this chat serves as high-level reasoning layer over capable but contextless agents (2026-05-13). ## Work & Workflow - **Domain**: PhD in superconducting circuits (RSFQ pulse logic). - **Project**: `sfq-factory` repo — reimplemented ~6 years of PhD work in ~1 week using AI agents. - **Agent workflow**: Does not read generated code; trusts tests, literature corpus, and personal interpretation. Feels like a "software engineering manager" merging branches. - **Report format preference**: Prefers structured, machine-generated reports with ranked findings and evidence (sfq-factory pattern) over conversational summaries. - **Goal**: Automating his own skilled job away; wants an AI assistant/conversation partner. - **Domain evolution**: Observed an "inversion" over ~3 years — went from teaching ChatGPT SFQ basics to having AI models teach him domain details. - **Work vs research distinction**: Work code (Codex-generated Python) must be human-readable because the product matters; research code is experimental and readability is secondary. ## Origins - Started with Hyprland ricing via ChatGPT/Codex ~2 months ago, got distracted, returned to KDE. - Views AI agents as realizing the "Star Trek computer" / "Weird Science" ideal. ## Recent topics , disconnects, or permission issues in the past ~5.5 hours since 13:39Z reload. ## 2026-05-15T01:11Z (archived) - **nanoGPT model evaluation fully resolved** (May 14): Benchmark report analyzed, main-model shortlist narrowed to GLM-5.1 and MiniMax M2.7. Subagent consolation test completed at 23:57Z. No further model testing pending. - **No pending timers**. - **No active subagents**; last jobs completed at 23:57Z May 14. - **Session health**: Stable. No ACP errors, disconnects, or permission issues. - **opencode-minimal status**: Still unverified. Config exists but not directly tested. - **Current main model**: `kimi-for-coding/k2p6` via Kimi subscription. ## 2026-05-14T02:11Z (archived) - **Approval wrapper fix validated** (01:49Z): Timer wakeup successfully triggered `persistent-chat-approved-patch` for `opencode-test`. Consumption race resolved. - **opencode-minimal status**: Still unverified. User tested the patch mechanism with a temporary `opencode-test` entry instead. - No pending timers; no active subagents. ## 2026-05-14T00:11Z (archived) - Pending approval timers (`tmr-e409768288`, `tmr-41494c97ce`) for opencode-minimal MCP patch — all resolved. - Session health stable, heartbeat at 00:06Z with 707 entries. ## 2026-05-13T16:18Z (archived) - Old pending wakeup timers (`tmr-7dd841b4a0`, `tmr-d1a9ac754a`) long resolved/expired. - No active subagents at that time. ## Reflection journal ter.json cleanly. The in-progress ImmoScout24 analysis context was likely lost to the reload. - **No new durable user facts, corrections, or model decisions**: The past hour contained active task work (housing automation), not durable memory signals. - **Memory candidates**: 24 candidates reviewed, none promoted. Same persistent transient pool (May 11-16 soft signals). The oldest candidates are now 5 days old with no durable signals to justify promotion. - **Curated memory updated**: Added manual proactive reload entry (line 39). Metadata refreshed (7103 → 7153 lines). File at 93 lines, well under the 120-line target. - (Operational) The user likely needs to re-initiate the ImmoScout24 Playwright check since the context was lost to the reload. The user's queue mentions this as "[housing]" intent. - (Operational) The 188.5K/200K usage confirms the ~10K tokens/hour burn rate estimate. At that rate, ~19 hours of active chat fills the context window. The 12:54Z reload was at ~18.9 hours into the session. - (Speculative) If proactive manual reloads become standard practice, the continuity injection system's ability to survive reloads becomes increasingly critical. Each proactive reload is now a continuity test. - (Speculative) The user may want to follow up on the ImmoScout24 automation in the next turn. Having Playwright available as a tool means this is feasible without subagents. ## Recent decisions ```json d2a2629b20584abde8744f64", "size": 23966 }, { "path": "/usr/local/bin/persistent-chat-reload", "updated": "2026-05-12T17:08:58.497441+00:00", "sha256": "19967524f9d4e7a032367764bc378dcb2ecb6236463e165af279f78bcef540b0", "size": 6005 }, { "path": "/home/openclaw/.config/opencode-persistent-chat-xdg/opencode/opencode.json", "updated": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.956458+00:00", "sha256": "b68c455b8826b0d631173b526dd023cf97c906957bf578066465b7c35892d18b", "size": 74076 }, { "path": "/usr/local/bin/opencode-persistent-chat", "updated": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.956375+00:00", "sha256": "c5f6aad5af7c9582a7f1b1da579ffebe0f5ad68b6df8f8aa69b2250ab6c324c4", "size": 555 }, { "path": "/home/gleb/openclaw/openclaw-status-mcp.py", "updated": "2026-05-12T23:53:59.802312+00:00", "sha256": "e0ba1d82f774c0822e5e3456ccf099e1d6089459084c439877be0323b33e0683", "size": 108940 } ] } ``` ## Recent failures ```json have explicit fail-closed bash/read permissions; use direct read/glob/grep or allowlisted sandbox/wrapper, never native asks", "command": "'/usr/local/bin/openclaw-persistent-chat-sandbox' --cwd ... cat /home/openclaw/.config/.../opencode.json" }, { "key": "model-opencode-go-monthly-usage-limit-ai-apicallerror-429-opencode-go-kimi-k2-6--b140cd0c79", "ts": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.879756+00:00", "tool": "model", "pattern": "opencode-go monthly usage limit / AI_APICallError 429", "outcome": "persistent-chat turn produced no Matrix reply and later timed out as ACP_TURN_FAILED although Playwright had only failed cleanly earlier", "avoid_until": "2026-06-11T22:04:05.879578+00:00", "recommended_alternative": "switch persistent-chat off exhausted opencode-go model, reload backend, and report API quota errors immediately when detected", "command": "opencode-go/kimi-k2.6 returned GoUsageLimitError Monthly usage limit reached" } ] } ``` Live runtime capability context: Live Matrix-lite capabilities are dynamic; prefer status/capability tools over assuming boot-time config. - Use matrix_lite_status_context_usage_report for read-only context/session usage; it cannot reload. - Use matrix_lite_status_capability_report for current live tools, repo paths, calendar, and reload policy. - Avoid persistent-chat reloads for status/debug. Reload only on explicit user request, model switch, or context guard threshold. - Throwaway repo test markers matching `.test-*` can be cleaned with allowlisted `rm -f <repo>/.test-*`; recursive rm remains denied without exact approval. Repo paths: sfq_factory=/home/gleb/sfq-factory, automeat=/home/gleb/automeat, openclaw_tools=/home/gleb/openclaw-tools, videoctl=/home/gleb/openclaw/videoctl, matrix_lite_app=/home/matrix-lite/app, runtime_snapshot=/home/matrix-lite/runtime-repo Calendar: ics_dir=/home/matrix-lite/workspace/calendar-ics, timer=matrix-lite-vdirsyncer-calendar.timer Recent room-local conversation: User: Yes proceed why did you stop? We need to increase limits. Also was there supposed to be text before recommended next action or was it truncated? Assistant: There's also a separate file attachment in the conversation history (`sfq_architecture_report (1).docx`) — not sure if you want me to look at that as well. User: Hmm no, what are you doing? Assistant: Your call. User: Check Assistant: What would you like to do with it? User: Let's continue the immoscout test Assistant: Session still logged in and on the messenger page. The login worked with zero anti-bot friction. From the previous work, the inbox has a few conversations needing responses: **Needs decisions from you:** 1. **Eva Stefan** — wants documents, offering viewing Mon 18.05 @ 19:30 2. **Hausverwaltung Akazienhof** — viewing invite Tue 19.05 @ 17:30 (pending response) 3. **Dario Crnalic** — asking if €2,300 buyout + July move-in works for you What would you like to test? I can draft a reply for your approval, try searching for flats, or explore other parts of the account. Recent incomplete/failed turns that still matter for continuity: - 2026-05-16T14:01:24.979196Z user said: I think buyouts are mostly scams, it's usually some overpriced furniture or kitchen. Also companies often ask for long forms and never reply, so we need to deprioritize those who ask for forms without mentioning viewing, deprioritize generic-looking responses and prioritize the genuine private human ones. What else is there in the inbox? status: user_only; reason: queued_for_conversation Recent/current attachment metadata, if any: None Message this user replied to, if any: None Queued/batched messages, if any: None Per-turn volatile reminders: - Answer normally and concisely. Put only user-visible answer text inside <matrix_lite_final>...</matrix_lite_final>. - Use the live capability context above as the source of truth for current debug/capability tools; call capability/permission/context MCP tools when uncertain instead of relying on stale boot knowledge. - If permission is needed or a bridge denies a tool, emit the structured Matrix-lite approval tag from your stable prompt; do not only describe approval in prose. - If recent incomplete/failed turns mention an unhandled user intent, address it now before moving on. - Use attachment/reply metadata when present; otherwise ignore empty metadata sections. - Do not mention internal Matrix-lite metadata unless the user asks. User message: I think buyouts are mostly scams, it's usually some overpriced furniture or kitchen. Also companies often ask for long forms and never reply, so we need to deprioritize those who ask for forms without mentioning viewing, deprioritize generic-looking responses and prioritize the genuine private human ones. What else is there in the inbox?


<matrix_lite_final>Good call on the buyouts. Here's the full inbox broken down by priority: --- ## 🟢 Priority — Real humans with viewing offers **1. Eva Stefan** — Beethovenstraße, Neufahrn *(today 15:03)* Private person. Directly offered **viewing Mon 18.05 @ 19:30**. Also asks for documents, but viewing is on the table. This is your best lead. **2. Hausverwaltung Akazienhof** — Unterschleißheim *(15.05)* Company/property manager. **Viewing invite Tue 19.05 @ 17:30**. Status "Ausstehend" (needs your accept/decline). Lower priority since it's a company. **3. Daniel Fuchs** — Camerloherstraße, Ismaning *(15.05)* Said "gimme time, will reply by Monday." Alive but waiting. --- ## 🟡 Medium — Active but stalled | Person | Status | Note | |--------|--------|------| | **Manfred Hoth** | Ausstehend | You replied you missed his viewing, asked for replacement. Waiting. | | **Armin Trakosevic** | Waiting | You agreed to July suggestion. Waiting for his date. | | **Arzum Kilic** | ✅ Bestätigt | Already confirmed. Done. | --- ## 🔴 Dead ends | Person | Reason | |--------|--------| | **Markus Entleutner** | ❌ Rejection — property awarded elsewhere | | **Dario Crnalic** | €2,300 buyout — as you said, probably a scam. **Ignore.** | --- ## ⚫ Sent, no reply (deprioritized) **15 conversations** where you sent your standard application but the landlord never responded. These include Laura Schmid, Thomas Bockhorni, Werner Boos, M. Sittenauer, Michael Straßer, Susanne Pröls, Diana Schmerl, Harald Körmer, Karl-Heinz Schmutzer-Staudinger, Sonja Schußmüller, and others. All in Freising/Ismaning/Eching/Garching area. If they never replied, they're likely dead leads — not worth following up unless we automate re-sending. --- **Best actionable lead right now:** Eva Stefan — viewing Monday, seems like a real human landlord. Want me to draft a reply for your approval saying you'll attend, and list what documents you can provide? </matrix_lite_final>


UPDATED — Added ImmoScout24 login success, secrets folder convention, task-focus lesson, trust boundary, and limits-needed entries (97 lines, under 120).