You are a lightweight Matrix-lite chat worker. This is Phase 3B of the Matrix-lite replacement path. Use a cheap model and keep the response concise, but preserve the structure needed to later swap in the full persistent-chat prompt package. Conversation metadata: - conversation_key: persistent:main - session_label: persistent-chat-20260516T125427Z - prompt_package: None - shared_memory_profile: None - room_id: !CZLwoJfCyftA7oA5CVj2gIEKWqyv1lu01r0oFboEqZg - source_event_id: $9Z_H3a9u56HV3haT74jdbd4HooWe3OE8V0euv2iSRtc - reply_to_id: None - thread_root_id: None Persistent-chat memory/continuity context: ## Curated memory ted preference for minimal nannying. - **Memory autonomy**: Does not want to manually curate assistant memory files; expects assistant to self-manage and self-correct. Will intervene only for corruption or hallucination (2026-05-13). - **Correction: decisions, failures, and reflections are useful (2026-05-16)**: When assistant suggested pruning decisions/failures/reflection notes from continuity injection to save space, user explicitly rejected this. These sections are confirmed useful and should stay. Reflection notes should become richer (tool permissions are now resolved). The assistant was wrong to suggest trimming them. - **Project stance**: Infrastructure experiments (subagents, reflection, autonomy) are the primary hobby and goal, not merely productivity tools. Stock Codex handles scoped "real work"; this chat serves as high-level reasoning layer over capable but contextless agents (2026-05-13). - **Trust boundary — pre-write approval (2026-05-16)**: User stated "I trust you just ask me before writing any messages" — explicit trust delegation with a mandatory pre-write check requirement, not blanket autonomy. Use approval flow before composing external messages (e.g., ImmoScout24 replies). - **Step/timeout limits need raising (2026-05-16)**: User said "We need to increase limits" after assistant halted mid-task — limits for steps or subagent timeouts should be raised to support multi-step Playwright/long-running automation tasks. ## Work & Workflow - **Domain**: PhD in superconducting circuits (RSFQ pulse logic). - **Project**: `sfq-factory` repo — reimplemented ~6 years of PhD work in ~1 week using AI agents. - **Agent workflow**: Does not read generated code; trusts tests, literature corpus, and personal interpretation. Feels like a "software engineering manager" merging branches. - **Report format preference**: Prefers structured, machine-generated reports with ranked findings and evidence (sfq-factory pattern) over conversational summaries. - **Goal**: Automating his own skilled job away; wants an AI assistant/conversation partner. - **Domain evolution**: Observed an "inversion" over ~3 years — went from teaching ChatGPT SFQ basics to having AI models teach him domain details. - **Work vs research distinction**: Work code (Codex-generated Python) must be human-readable because the product matters; research code is experimental and readability is secondary. ## Origins - Started with Hyprland ricing via ChatGPT/Codex ~2 months ago, got distracted, returned to KDE. - Views AI agents as realizing the "Star Trek computer" / "Weird Science" ideal. ## Recent topics , disconnects, or permission issues in the past ~5.5 hours since 13:39Z reload. ## 2026-05-15T01:11Z (archived) - **nanoGPT model evaluation fully resolved** (May 14): Benchmark report analyzed, main-model shortlist narrowed to GLM-5.1 and MiniMax M2.7. Subagent consolation test completed at 23:57Z. No further model testing pending. - **No pending timers**. - **No active subagents**; last jobs completed at 23:57Z May 14. - **Session health**: Stable. No ACP errors, disconnects, or permission issues. - **opencode-minimal status**: Still unverified. Config exists but not directly tested. - **Current main model**: `kimi-for-coding/k2p6` via Kimi subscription. ## 2026-05-14T02:11Z (archived) - **Approval wrapper fix validated** (01:49Z): Timer wakeup successfully triggered `persistent-chat-approved-patch` for `opencode-test`. Consumption race resolved. - **opencode-minimal status**: Still unverified. User tested the patch mechanism with a temporary `opencode-test` entry instead. - No pending timers; no active subagents. ## 2026-05-14T00:11Z (archived) - Pending approval timers (`tmr-e409768288`, `tmr-41494c97ce`) for opencode-minimal MCP patch — all resolved. - Session health stable, heartbeat at 00:06Z with 707 entries. ## 2026-05-13T16:18Z (archived) - Old pending wakeup timers (`tmr-7dd841b4a0`, `tmr-d1a9ac754a`) long resolved/expired. - No active subagents at that time. ## Reflection journal TL-based cleanup. - **Curated memory updated**: Added ImmoScout24 login entry, secrets convention, task-focus lesson, trust boundary, and limits-needed entries. Metadata refreshed (7153 → 9261 lines). File at 97 lines, under 120-line target. - (Operational) The user has an active ImmoScout24 browser session with credentials loaded. The session survives idle time, so the messenger page is ready for next interaction. User wants to continue testing — need to confirm limits are raised before proceeding with multi-step Playwright tasks. - (Operational) Assistant task-focus failure is a behavioral concern. During active multi-step workflows, the assistant should suppress irrelevant observations and stay on the user's current task. This is related to the model's tendency to scan conversation history and surface anything that seems potentially relevant — but timing matters. - (Speculative) If the user pursues ImmoScout24 conversation responses (drafting replies to Eva Stefan, Hausverwaltung Akazienhof, Dario Crnalic), the pre-write approval flow will be tested for the first time in a real-world scenario vs approval-testing. - (Speculative) The secrets folder convention may extend to other credentials (SFQ gateware license keys, other housing portals, etc.). Worth monitoring whether a `secrets/` directory under the workspace becomes a standard pattern for the Matrix-lite infrastructure. ## Recent decisions ```json d2a2629b20584abde8744f64", "size": 23966 }, { "path": "/usr/local/bin/persistent-chat-reload", "updated": "2026-05-12T17:08:58.497441+00:00", "sha256": "19967524f9d4e7a032367764bc378dcb2ecb6236463e165af279f78bcef540b0", "size": 6005 }, { "path": "/home/openclaw/.config/opencode-persistent-chat-xdg/opencode/opencode.json", "updated": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.956458+00:00", "sha256": "b68c455b8826b0d631173b526dd023cf97c906957bf578066465b7c35892d18b", "size": 74076 }, { "path": "/usr/local/bin/opencode-persistent-chat", "updated": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.956375+00:00", "sha256": "c5f6aad5af7c9582a7f1b1da579ffebe0f5ad68b6df8f8aa69b2250ab6c324c4", "size": 555 }, { "path": "/home/gleb/openclaw/openclaw-status-mcp.py", "updated": "2026-05-12T23:53:59.802312+00:00", "sha256": "e0ba1d82f774c0822e5e3456ccf099e1d6089459084c439877be0323b33e0683", "size": 108940 } ] } ``` ## Recent failures ```json have explicit fail-closed bash/read permissions; use direct read/glob/grep or allowlisted sandbox/wrapper, never native asks", "command": "'/usr/local/bin/openclaw-persistent-chat-sandbox' --cwd ... cat /home/openclaw/.config/.../opencode.json" }, { "key": "model-opencode-go-monthly-usage-limit-ai-apicallerror-429-opencode-go-kimi-k2-6--b140cd0c79", "ts": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.879756+00:00", "tool": "model", "pattern": "opencode-go monthly usage limit / AI_APICallError 429", "outcome": "persistent-chat turn produced no Matrix reply and later timed out as ACP_TURN_FAILED although Playwright had only failed cleanly earlier", "avoid_until": "2026-06-11T22:04:05.879578+00:00", "recommended_alternative": "switch persistent-chat off exhausted opencode-go model, reload backend, and report API quota errors immediately when detected", "command": "opencode-go/kimi-k2.6 returned GoUsageLimitError Monthly usage limit reached" } ] } ``` Live runtime capability context: Live Matrix-lite capabilities are dynamic; prefer status/capability tools over assuming boot-time config. - Use matrix_lite_status_context_usage_report for read-only context/session usage; it cannot reload. - Use matrix_lite_status_capability_report for current live tools, repo paths, calendar, and reload policy. - Avoid persistent-chat reloads for status/debug. Reload only on explicit user request, model switch, or context guard threshold. - Throwaway repo test markers matching `.test-*` can be cleaned with allowlisted `rm -f <repo>/.test-*`; recursive rm remains denied without exact approval. Repo paths: sfq_factory=/home/gleb/sfq-factory, automeat=/home/gleb/automeat, openclaw_tools=/home/gleb/openclaw-tools, videoctl=/home/gleb/openclaw/videoctl, matrix_lite_app=/home/matrix-lite/app, runtime_snapshot=/home/matrix-lite/runtime-repo Calendar: ics_dir=/home/matrix-lite/workspace/calendar-ics, timer=matrix-lite-vdirsyncer-calendar.timer Recent room-local conversation: User: Please analyze this info for all the replies you collected before Assistant: ### Key insight All these listings are **extremely competitive** (50-80+ contacts each). The market is brutal. The fact that Eva Stefan replied same day she published is actually promising — she's actively processing. But you'll need to move fast on the documents if you want to secure that Monday viewing. User: Please repeat your last 2 replies Assistant: The last two replies from me were: 1. The one about checking premium stats for all the replies (the analyze this info reply) - which contained the Plus Insights table for Eva Stefan, Hausverwaltung Akazienhof, and Markus Entleutner. 2. The one before that about can you see what the premium statistics show - which only had the data for Markus Entleutner. Wait, let me look more carefully at the conversation flow: User: "Can you see what the premium statistics show about these postings? How many views and contacted are there?" Assistant: "Want me to check the stats on other specific listings? Eva Stefan's listing or the Akazienhof one?" Then: User: "Please analyze this info for all the replies you collected before" Assistant: [The big analysis reply] But wait, looking at ... Here are my last two replies: --- **Reply 1 — Premium stats for all replies:** ### 1. 🟢 Eva Stefan — *Beethovenstraße, Neufahrn* — **BEST LEAD** | Stat | Value | |------|-------| | **Views** | **526** | | **Published** | **Today** (16.05.2026) | | **Contacted** | **61** | | **Saved** | **62** | | **Competition** | 82 Plus + 18 Basic members | | **Rent** | 795€ cold / 930€ warm, 41m², 1 Zi. | Published *today* and …[truncated] User: What about active but stalled items? Assistant: **Manfred Hoth** — Sankt-Ulrich-Straße 17, Unterschleißheim You sent: sorry you missed the viewing, asked for a replacement. Status "Ausstehend" — waiting for his reply. **Armin Trakosevic** — Unterschleißheim You sent: agreed to his suggestion of a July viewing/date. Waiting for him to propose a concrete time. **Arzum Kilic** — Unterschleißheim Already confirmed ("Bestätigt") — you accepted the viewing invite. Done. None of these had expose links in their messages, so I couldn't check their premium stats. I could try to search for their addresses on ImmoScout24 if you want the data for them too. User: Hmm, maybe the info is in the listings? Assistant: ent'); ``` ### Page - Page URL: https://www.immobilienscout24.de/Suche/controller/embeddedSearch.do?search=1&address=Sankt-Ulrich-Stra%C3%9Fe+17+Unterschlei%C3%9Fheim&realestatetype=apartmentrent ### Snapshot - [Snapshot](../browser-output/page-2026-05-16T14-30-17-639Z.yml) kind: other input: https://www.immobilienscout24.de/Suche/S-/Wohnung-miete/Umkreissuche/Strasse_Sankt-Ulrich-Strasse_17/85716-Unterschleissheim output: ### Ran Playwright code ```js await page.goto('https://www.immobilienscout24.de/Suche/S-/Wohnung-miete/Umkreissuche/Strasse_Sankt-Ulrich-Strasse_17/85716-Unterschleissheim'); ``` ### Page - Page URL: https://www.immobilienscout24.de/ - Page Title: ImmoScout24 – Mit über 6,5 Mio. Immobilien. ### Snapshot - [Snapshot](../browser-output/page-2026-05-16T14-30-21-864Z.yml) Actually, let me try a different approach — use the main search bar. kind: other input: https://www.immobilienscout24.de/meinkonto/meine-immobilien/ output: ### Ran Playwright code ```js await page.goto('https://www.immobilienscout24.de/meinkonto/meine-immobilien/'); ``` ### Page - Page URL: https://www.immobilienscout24.de/meinkonto/meine-immobilien/ - Page Title: Meine Immobilien ### Snapshot - …[truncated] Recent incomplete/failed turns that still matter for continuity: - 2026-05-16T14:43:46.868333Z user said: Please repeat your last 1 message there were truncation issues status: user_only; reason: queued_for_conversation Recent/current attachment metadata, if any: None Message this user replied to, if any: None Queued/batched messages, if any: None Per-turn volatile reminders: - Answer normally and concisely. Put only user-visible answer text inside <matrix_lite_final>...</matrix_lite_final>. - Use the live capability context above as the source of truth for current debug/capability tools; call capability/permission/context MCP tools when uncertain instead of relying on stale boot knowledge. - If permission is needed or a bridge denies a tool, emit the structured Matrix-lite approval tag from your stable prompt; do not only describe approval in prose. - If recent incomplete/failed turns mention an unhandled user intent, address it now before moving on. - Use attachment/reply metadata when present; otherwise ignore empty metadata sections. - Do not mention internal Matrix-lite metadata unless the user asks. User message: Please repeat your last 1 message there were truncation issues


Here's the last message (the full inbox with premium stats for all identified listings): --- ## Updated Full Inbox — All Identified Listings Analyzed ### 🟢 Priority — Real humans, viewing offered **1. Eva Stefan** — *795€ / 41m², Neufahrn* Views: **526** | Published: **Today** (16.05) | Contacted: **61** | Saved: **62** | Competition: 82 Plus + 18 Basic **2. Manfred Hoth** — *1,270€ / 69m², Unterschleißheim* Views: **1,285** | Published: **Yesterday** (15.05) | Contacted: **86** | Saved: **80** | Competition: 60 Plus + 40 Basic **3. Daniel Fuchs** — said he'll reply by Monday. No expose link in message. --- ### 🟡 Medium **4. Hausverwaltung Akazienhof** — *1,170€ / 65m², Unterschleißheim* (company) Views: **1,487** | Published: 22.04 (3 wks ago) | Contacted: **77** | Saved: **103** | Competition: 52 Plus + 35 Basic **5. Arzum Kilic** — *1,600€ / 55m², Unterschleißheim* ✅ **Bestätigt** (viewing today!) **6. Armin Trakosevic** — no expose link, waiting for his July date proposal. --- ### 🔴 Dead/Buyout/Rejections | Landlord | Reason | Views | Contacted | |----------|--------|-------|-----------| | **Markus Entleutner** | Rejected | 760 | 58 | | **Bardyl Kabashi** | *neu:* Rejected | ? | ? | | **Avni Ahmetaj** | *neu:* Rejected | ? | ? | | **Lisa Bergner** | Rejected (old, 2023) | ? | ? | | **Andreas M** | *neu:* Rejected | ? | ? | | **Dario Crnalic** | €2,300 buyout scam | ? | ? | | **Guo Sheng** | Form request, no viewing | ? | ? | | **Daniela Lochmann** | Form request (company) | ? | ? | ### ⚫ No reply (sent only) ~25+ conversations where you sent the standard message and got no reply. </matrix_lite_final>


You are a lightweight Matrix-lite chat worker. This is Phase 3B of the Matrix-lite replacement path. Use a cheap model and keep the response concise, but preserve the structure needed to later swap in the full persistent-chat prompt package. Conversation metadata: - conversation_key: persistent:main - session_label: persistent-chat-20260516T125427Z - prompt_package: None - shared_memory_profile: None - room_id: !CZLwoJfCyftA7oA5CVj2gIEKWqyv1lu01r0oFboEqZg - source_event_id: $xMq4JhwZuZjH4_pEdYGJnwj-gOil6JQEq52kiskCtMQ - reply_to_id: None - thread_root_id: None Persistent-chat memory/continuity context: ## Curated memory ted preference for minimal nannying. - **Memory autonomy**: Does not want to manually curate assistant memory files; expects assistant to self-manage and self-correct. Will intervene only for corruption or hallucination (2026-05-13). - **Correction: decisions, failures, and reflections are useful (2026-05-16)**: When assistant suggested pruning decisions/failures/reflection notes from continuity injection to save space, user explicitly rejected this. These sections are confirmed useful and should stay. Reflection notes should become richer (tool permissions are now resolved). The assistant was wrong to suggest trimming them. - **Project stance**: Infrastructure experiments (subagents, reflection, autonomy) are the primary hobby and goal, not merely productivity tools. Stock Codex handles scoped "real work"; this chat serves as high-level reasoning layer over capable but contextless agents (2026-05-13). - **Trust boundary — pre-write approval (2026-05-16)**: User stated "I trust you just ask me before writing any messages" — explicit trust delegation with a mandatory pre-write check requirement, not blanket autonomy. Use approval flow before composing external messages (e.g., ImmoScout24 replies). - **Step/timeout limits need raising (2026-05-16)**: User said "We need to increase limits" after assistant halted mid-task — limits for steps or subagent timeouts should be raised to support multi-step Playwright/long-running automation tasks. ## Work & Workflow - **Domain**: PhD in superconducting circuits (RSFQ pulse logic). - **Project**: `sfq-factory` repo — reimplemented ~6 years of PhD work in ~1 week using AI agents. - **Agent workflow**: Does not read generated code; trusts tests, literature corpus, and personal interpretation. Feels like a "software engineering manager" merging branches. - **Report format preference**: Prefers structured, machine-generated reports with ranked findings and evidence (sfq-factory pattern) over conversational summaries. - **Goal**: Automating his own skilled job away; wants an AI assistant/conversation partner. - **Domain evolution**: Observed an "inversion" over ~3 years — went from teaching ChatGPT SFQ basics to having AI models teach him domain details. - **Work vs research distinction**: Work code (Codex-generated Python) must be human-readable because the product matters; research code is experimental and readability is secondary. ## Origins - Started with Hyprland ricing via ChatGPT/Codex ~2 months ago, got distracted, returned to KDE. - Views AI agents as realizing the "Star Trek computer" / "Weird Science" ideal. ## Recent topics , disconnects, or permission issues in the past ~5.5 hours since 13:39Z reload. ## 2026-05-15T01:11Z (archived) - **nanoGPT model evaluation fully resolved** (May 14): Benchmark report analyzed, main-model shortlist narrowed to GLM-5.1 and MiniMax M2.7. Subagent consolation test completed at 23:57Z. No further model testing pending. - **No pending timers**. - **No active subagents**; last jobs completed at 23:57Z May 14. - **Session health**: Stable. No ACP errors, disconnects, or permission issues. - **opencode-minimal status**: Still unverified. Config exists but not directly tested. - **Current main model**: `kimi-for-coding/k2p6` via Kimi subscription. ## 2026-05-14T02:11Z (archived) - **Approval wrapper fix validated** (01:49Z): Timer wakeup successfully triggered `persistent-chat-approved-patch` for `opencode-test`. Consumption race resolved. - **opencode-minimal status**: Still unverified. User tested the patch mechanism with a temporary `opencode-test` entry instead. - No pending timers; no active subagents. ## 2026-05-14T00:11Z (archived) - Pending approval timers (`tmr-e409768288`, `tmr-41494c97ce`) for opencode-minimal MCP patch — all resolved. - Session health stable, heartbeat at 00:06Z with 707 entries. ## 2026-05-13T16:18Z (archived) - Old pending wakeup timers (`tmr-7dd841b4a0`, `tmr-d1a9ac754a`) long resolved/expired. - No active subagents at that time. ## Reflection journal TL-based cleanup. - **Curated memory updated**: Added ImmoScout24 login entry, secrets convention, task-focus lesson, trust boundary, and limits-needed entries. Metadata refreshed (7153 → 9261 lines). File at 97 lines, under 120-line target. - (Operational) The user has an active ImmoScout24 browser session with credentials loaded. The session survives idle time, so the messenger page is ready for next interaction. User wants to continue testing — need to confirm limits are raised before proceeding with multi-step Playwright tasks. - (Operational) Assistant task-focus failure is a behavioral concern. During active multi-step workflows, the assistant should suppress irrelevant observations and stay on the user's current task. This is related to the model's tendency to scan conversation history and surface anything that seems potentially relevant — but timing matters. - (Speculative) If the user pursues ImmoScout24 conversation responses (drafting replies to Eva Stefan, Hausverwaltung Akazienhof, Dario Crnalic), the pre-write approval flow will be tested for the first time in a real-world scenario vs approval-testing. - (Speculative) The secrets folder convention may extend to other credentials (SFQ gateware license keys, other housing portals, etc.). Worth monitoring whether a `secrets/` directory under the workspace becomes a standard pattern for the Matrix-lite infrastructure. ## Recent decisions ```json d2a2629b20584abde8744f64", "size": 23966 }, { "path": "/usr/local/bin/persistent-chat-reload", "updated": "2026-05-12T17:08:58.497441+00:00", "sha256": "19967524f9d4e7a032367764bc378dcb2ecb6236463e165af279f78bcef540b0", "size": 6005 }, { "path": "/home/openclaw/.config/opencode-persistent-chat-xdg/opencode/opencode.json", "updated": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.956458+00:00", "sha256": "b68c455b8826b0d631173b526dd023cf97c906957bf578066465b7c35892d18b", "size": 74076 }, { "path": "/usr/local/bin/opencode-persistent-chat", "updated": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.956375+00:00", "sha256": "c5f6aad5af7c9582a7f1b1da579ffebe0f5ad68b6df8f8aa69b2250ab6c324c4", "size": 555 }, { "path": "/home/gleb/openclaw/openclaw-status-mcp.py", "updated": "2026-05-12T23:53:59.802312+00:00", "sha256": "e0ba1d82f774c0822e5e3456ccf099e1d6089459084c439877be0323b33e0683", "size": 108940 } ] } ``` ## Recent failures ```json have explicit fail-closed bash/read permissions; use direct read/glob/grep or allowlisted sandbox/wrapper, never native asks", "command": "'/usr/local/bin/openclaw-persistent-chat-sandbox' --cwd ... cat /home/openclaw/.config/.../opencode.json" }, { "key": "model-opencode-go-monthly-usage-limit-ai-apicallerror-429-opencode-go-kimi-k2-6--b140cd0c79", "ts": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.879756+00:00", "tool": "model", "pattern": "opencode-go monthly usage limit / AI_APICallError 429", "outcome": "persistent-chat turn produced no Matrix reply and later timed out as ACP_TURN_FAILED although Playwright had only failed cleanly earlier", "avoid_until": "2026-06-11T22:04:05.879578+00:00", "recommended_alternative": "switch persistent-chat off exhausted opencode-go model, reload backend, and report API quota errors immediately when detected", "command": "opencode-go/kimi-k2.6 returned GoUsageLimitError Monthly usage limit reached" } ] } ``` Live runtime capability context: Live Matrix-lite capabilities are dynamic; prefer status/capability tools over assuming boot-time config. - Use matrix_lite_status_context_usage_report for read-only context/session usage; it cannot reload. - Use matrix_lite_status_capability_report for current live tools, repo paths, calendar, and reload policy. - Avoid persistent-chat reloads for status/debug. Reload only on explicit user request, model switch, or context guard threshold. - Throwaway repo test markers matching `.test-*` can be cleaned with allowlisted `rm -f <repo>/.test-*`; recursive rm remains denied without exact approval. Repo paths: sfq_factory=/home/gleb/sfq-factory, automeat=/home/gleb/automeat, openclaw_tools=/home/gleb/openclaw-tools, videoctl=/home/gleb/openclaw/videoctl, matrix_lite_app=/home/matrix-lite/app, runtime_snapshot=/home/matrix-lite/runtime-repo Calendar: ics_dir=/home/matrix-lite/workspace/calendar-ics, timer=matrix-lite-vdirsyncer-calendar.timer Recent room-local conversation: User: Please repeat your last 2 replies Assistant: The last two replies from me were: 1. The one about checking premium stats for all the replies (the analyze this info reply) - which contained the Plus Insights table for Eva Stefan, Hausverwaltung Akazienhof, and Markus Entleutner. 2. The one before that about can you see what the premium statistics show - which only had the data for Markus Entleutner. Wait, let me look more carefully at the conversation flow: User: "Can you see what the premium statistics show about these postings? How many views and contacted are there?" Assistant: "Want me to check the stats on other specific listings? Eva Stefan's listing or the Akazienhof one?" Then: User: "Please analyze this info for all the replies you collected before" Assistant: [The big analysis reply] But wait, looking at ... Here are my last two replies: --- **Reply 1 — Premium stats for all replies:** ### 1. 🟢 Eva Stefan — *Beethovenstraße, Neufahrn* — **BEST LEAD** | Stat | Value | |------|-------| | **Views** | **526** | | **Published** | **Today** (16.05.2026) | | **Contacted** | **61** | | **Saved** | **62** | | **Competition** | 82 Plus + 18 Basic members | | **Rent** | 795€ cold / 930€ warm, 41m², 1 Zi. | Published *today* and …[truncated] User: What about active but stalled items? Assistant: **Manfred Hoth** — Sankt-Ulrich-Straße 17, Unterschleißheim You sent: sorry you missed the viewing, asked for a replacement. Status "Ausstehend" — waiting for his reply. **Armin Trakosevic** — Unterschleißheim You sent: agreed to his suggestion of a July viewing/date. Waiting for him to propose a concrete time. **Arzum Kilic** — Unterschleißheim Already confirmed ("Bestätigt") — you accepted the viewing invite. Done. None of these had expose links in their messages, so I couldn't check their premium stats. I could try to search for their addresses on ImmoScout24 if you want the data for them too. User: Hmm, maybe the info is in the listings? Assistant: ent'); ``` ### Page - Page URL: https://www.immobilienscout24.de/Suche/controller/embeddedSearch.do?search=1&address=Sankt-Ulrich-Stra%C3%9Fe+17+Unterschlei%C3%9Fheim&realestatetype=apartmentrent ### Snapshot - [Snapshot](../browser-output/page-2026-05-16T14-30-17-639Z.yml) kind: other input: https://www.immobilienscout24.de/Suche/S-/Wohnung-miete/Umkreissuche/Strasse_Sankt-Ulrich-Strasse_17/85716-Unterschleissheim output: ### Ran Playwright code ```js await page.goto('https://www.immobilienscout24.de/Suche/S-/Wohnung-miete/Umkreissuche/Strasse_Sankt-Ulrich-Strasse_17/85716-Unterschleissheim'); ``` ### Page - Page URL: https://www.immobilienscout24.de/ - Page Title: ImmoScout24 – Mit über 6,5 Mio. Immobilien. ### Snapshot - [Snapshot](../browser-output/page-2026-05-16T14-30-21-864Z.yml) Actually, let me try a different approach — use the main search bar. kind: other input: https://www.immobilienscout24.de/meinkonto/meine-immobilien/ output: ### Ran Playwright code ```js await page.goto('https://www.immobilienscout24.de/meinkonto/meine-immobilien/'); ``` ### Page - Page URL: https://www.immobilienscout24.de/meinkonto/meine-immobilien/ - Page Title: Meine Immobilien ### Snapshot - …[truncated] User: Please repeat your last 1 message there were truncation issues Assistant: Here's the last message (the full inbox with premium stats for all identified listings): --- ## Updated Full Inbox — All Identified Listings Analyzed ### 🟢 Priority — Real humans, viewing offered **1. Eva Stefan** — *795€ / 41m², Neufahrn* Views: **526** | Published: **Today** (16.05) | Contacted: **61** | Saved: **62** | Competition: 82 Plus + 18 Basic **2. Manfred Hoth** — *1,270€ / 69m², Unterschleißheim* Views: **1,285** | Published: **Yesterday** (15.05) | Contacted: **86** | Saved: **80** | Competition: 60 Plus + 40 Basic **3. Daniel Fuchs** — said he'll reply by Monday. No expose link in message. --- ### 🟡 Medium **4. Hausverwaltung Akazienhof** — *1,170€ / 65m², Unterschleißheim* (company) Views: **1,487** | Published: 22.04 (3 wks ago) | Contacted: **77** | Saved: **103** | Competition: 52 Plus + 35 Basic **5. Arzum Kilic** — *1,600€ / 55m², Unterschleißheim* ✅ **Bestätigt** (viewing today!) **6. Armin Trakosevic** — no expose link, waiting for his July date proposal. --- ### 🔴 Dead/Buyout/Rejections | Landlord | Reason | Views | Contacted | |----------|--------|-------|-----------| | **Markus Entleutner** | Rejected | 760 | 58 | | **Bardyl Kabashi** | *neu:* …[truncated] Recent incomplete/failed turns that still matter for continuity: - 2026-05-16T14:48:04.230387Z user said: So for no 5 and 6, is it not possible to get the contacted/viewed info? status: user_only; reason: queued_for_conversation Recent/current attachment metadata, if any: None Message this user replied to, if any: None Queued/batched messages, if any: None Per-turn volatile reminders: - Answer normally and concisely. Put only user-visible answer text inside <matrix_lite_final>...</matrix_lite_final>. - Use the live capability context above as the source of truth for current debug/capability tools; call capability/permission/context MCP tools when uncertain instead of relying on stale boot knowledge. - If permission is needed or a bridge denies a tool, emit the structured Matrix-lite approval tag from your stable prompt; do not only describe approval in prose. - If recent incomplete/failed turns mention an unhandled user intent, address it now before moving on. - Use attachment/reply metadata when present; otherwise ignore empty metadata sections. - Do not mention internal Matrix-lite metadata unless the user asks. User message: So for no 5 and 6, is it not possible to get the contacted/viewed info?


I actually found the expose link for Arzum Kilic (expose/167751726) in the conversation — I just didn't check its details yet. Let me grab the stats now, and find Armin Trakosevic's too.


Got it! Now let me check Armin Trakosevic too.


Yes, it was possible! Here's the complete data: --- ### 5. Arzum Kilic — *1,200€ / 55m², Unterschleißheim* ✅ **Bestätigt** | Views | Published | Contacted | Saved | Competition | |-------|-----------|-----------|-------|------------| | **378** | 14.05.2026 | **22** | **26** | 18 Plus + 6 Basic | Pretty low-competition listing — only 22 people contacted her. Private person, replied quickly, viewing today. ### 6. Armin Trakosevic — *990€ / 37m², Unterschleißheim* (waiting for July date) | Views | Published | Contacted | Saved | Competition | |-------|-----------|-----------|-------|------------| | **393** | **Today** (16.05.2026) | **20** | **25** | 72 Plus + 28 Basic | Also low-contact (20), published today. Private person ("Zuhause mit Balkon"). He said viewing is "voraussichtlich Anfang Juli" — and this just got published today, so he's probably still processing. --- **Key insight on both:** Low contact numbers (20-22 each) vs 61-86 on the hotter listings. These are less competitive — better odds for you. The Trakosevic one especially is freshly published today and already replied to you, which is a good sign. </matrix_lite_final>


You are a lightweight Matrix-lite chat worker. This is Phase 3B of the Matrix-lite replacement path. Use a cheap model and keep the response concise, but preserve the structure needed to later swap in the full persistent-chat prompt package. Conversation metadata: - conversation_key: persistent:main - session_label: persistent-chat-20260516T125427Z - prompt_package: None - shared_memory_profile: None - room_id: !CZLwoJfCyftA7oA5CVj2gIEKWqyv1lu01r0oFboEqZg - source_event_id: $B9pFY0DFvrObsIxyBYeYIBSDPUBX59DJqi2xRkC0HYM - reply_to_id: None - thread_root_id: None Persistent-chat memory/continuity context: ## Curated memory ted preference for minimal nannying. - **Memory autonomy**: Does not want to manually curate assistant memory files; expects assistant to self-manage and self-correct. Will intervene only for corruption or hallucination (2026-05-13). - **Correction: decisions, failures, and reflections are useful (2026-05-16)**: When assistant suggested pruning decisions/failures/reflection notes from continuity injection to save space, user explicitly rejected this. These sections are confirmed useful and should stay. Reflection notes should become richer (tool permissions are now resolved). The assistant was wrong to suggest trimming them. - **Project stance**: Infrastructure experiments (subagents, reflection, autonomy) are the primary hobby and goal, not merely productivity tools. Stock Codex handles scoped "real work"; this chat serves as high-level reasoning layer over capable but contextless agents (2026-05-13). - **Trust boundary — pre-write approval (2026-05-16)**: User stated "I trust you just ask me before writing any messages" — explicit trust delegation with a mandatory pre-write check requirement, not blanket autonomy. Use approval flow before composing external messages (e.g., ImmoScout24 replies). - **Step/timeout limits need raising (2026-05-16)**: User said "We need to increase limits" after assistant halted mid-task — limits for steps or subagent timeouts should be raised to support multi-step Playwright/long-running automation tasks. ## Work & Workflow - **Domain**: PhD in superconducting circuits (RSFQ pulse logic). - **Project**: `sfq-factory` repo — reimplemented ~6 years of PhD work in ~1 week using AI agents. - **Agent workflow**: Does not read generated code; trusts tests, literature corpus, and personal interpretation. Feels like a "software engineering manager" merging branches. - **Report format preference**: Prefers structured, machine-generated reports with ranked findings and evidence (sfq-factory pattern) over conversational summaries. - **Goal**: Automating his own skilled job away; wants an AI assistant/conversation partner. - **Domain evolution**: Observed an "inversion" over ~3 years — went from teaching ChatGPT SFQ basics to having AI models teach him domain details. - **Work vs research distinction**: Work code (Codex-generated Python) must be human-readable because the product matters; research code is experimental and readability is secondary. ## Origins - Started with Hyprland ricing via ChatGPT/Codex ~2 months ago, got distracted, returned to KDE. - Views AI agents as realizing the "Star Trek computer" / "Weird Science" ideal. ## Recent topics , disconnects, or permission issues in the past ~5.5 hours since 13:39Z reload. ## 2026-05-15T01:11Z (archived) - **nanoGPT model evaluation fully resolved** (May 14): Benchmark report analyzed, main-model shortlist narrowed to GLM-5.1 and MiniMax M2.7. Subagent consolation test completed at 23:57Z. No further model testing pending. - **No pending timers**. - **No active subagents**; last jobs completed at 23:57Z May 14. - **Session health**: Stable. No ACP errors, disconnects, or permission issues. - **opencode-minimal status**: Still unverified. Config exists but not directly tested. - **Current main model**: `kimi-for-coding/k2p6` via Kimi subscription. ## 2026-05-14T02:11Z (archived) - **Approval wrapper fix validated** (01:49Z): Timer wakeup successfully triggered `persistent-chat-approved-patch` for `opencode-test`. Consumption race resolved. - **opencode-minimal status**: Still unverified. User tested the patch mechanism with a temporary `opencode-test` entry instead. - No pending timers; no active subagents. ## 2026-05-14T00:11Z (archived) - Pending approval timers (`tmr-e409768288`, `tmr-41494c97ce`) for opencode-minimal MCP patch — all resolved. - Session health stable, heartbeat at 00:06Z with 707 entries. ## 2026-05-13T16:18Z (archived) - Old pending wakeup timers (`tmr-7dd841b4a0`, `tmr-d1a9ac754a`) long resolved/expired. - No active subagents at that time. ## Reflection journal TL-based cleanup. - **Curated memory updated**: Added ImmoScout24 login entry, secrets convention, task-focus lesson, trust boundary, and limits-needed entries. Metadata refreshed (7153 → 9261 lines). File at 97 lines, under 120-line target. - (Operational) The user has an active ImmoScout24 browser session with credentials loaded. The session survives idle time, so the messenger page is ready for next interaction. User wants to continue testing — need to confirm limits are raised before proceeding with multi-step Playwright tasks. - (Operational) Assistant task-focus failure is a behavioral concern. During active multi-step workflows, the assistant should suppress irrelevant observations and stay on the user's current task. This is related to the model's tendency to scan conversation history and surface anything that seems potentially relevant — but timing matters. - (Speculative) If the user pursues ImmoScout24 conversation responses (drafting replies to Eva Stefan, Hausverwaltung Akazienhof, Dario Crnalic), the pre-write approval flow will be tested for the first time in a real-world scenario vs approval-testing. - (Speculative) The secrets folder convention may extend to other credentials (SFQ gateware license keys, other housing portals, etc.). Worth monitoring whether a `secrets/` directory under the workspace becomes a standard pattern for the Matrix-lite infrastructure. ## Recent decisions ```json d2a2629b20584abde8744f64", "size": 23966 }, { "path": "/usr/local/bin/persistent-chat-reload", "updated": "2026-05-12T17:08:58.497441+00:00", "sha256": "19967524f9d4e7a032367764bc378dcb2ecb6236463e165af279f78bcef540b0", "size": 6005 }, { "path": "/home/openclaw/.config/opencode-persistent-chat-xdg/opencode/opencode.json", "updated": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.956458+00:00", "sha256": "b68c455b8826b0d631173b526dd023cf97c906957bf578066465b7c35892d18b", "size": 74076 }, { "path": "/usr/local/bin/opencode-persistent-chat", "updated": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.956375+00:00", "sha256": "c5f6aad5af7c9582a7f1b1da579ffebe0f5ad68b6df8f8aa69b2250ab6c324c4", "size": 555 }, { "path": "/home/gleb/openclaw/openclaw-status-mcp.py", "updated": "2026-05-12T23:53:59.802312+00:00", "sha256": "e0ba1d82f774c0822e5e3456ccf099e1d6089459084c439877be0323b33e0683", "size": 108940 } ] } ``` ## Recent failures ```json have explicit fail-closed bash/read permissions; use direct read/glob/grep or allowlisted sandbox/wrapper, never native asks", "command": "'/usr/local/bin/openclaw-persistent-chat-sandbox' --cwd ... cat /home/openclaw/.config/.../opencode.json" }, { "key": "model-opencode-go-monthly-usage-limit-ai-apicallerror-429-opencode-go-kimi-k2-6--b140cd0c79", "ts": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.879756+00:00", "tool": "model", "pattern": "opencode-go monthly usage limit / AI_APICallError 429", "outcome": "persistent-chat turn produced no Matrix reply and later timed out as ACP_TURN_FAILED although Playwright had only failed cleanly earlier", "avoid_until": "2026-06-11T22:04:05.879578+00:00", "recommended_alternative": "switch persistent-chat off exhausted opencode-go model, reload backend, and report API quota errors immediately when detected", "command": "opencode-go/kimi-k2.6 returned GoUsageLimitError Monthly usage limit reached" } ] } ``` Live runtime capability context: Live Matrix-lite capabilities are dynamic; prefer status/capability tools over assuming boot-time config. - Use matrix_lite_status_context_usage_report for read-only context/session usage; it cannot reload. - Use matrix_lite_status_capability_report for current live tools, repo paths, calendar, and reload policy. - Avoid persistent-chat reloads for status/debug. Reload only on explicit user request, model switch, or context guard threshold. - Throwaway repo test markers matching `.test-*` can be cleaned with allowlisted `rm -f <repo>/.test-*`; recursive rm remains denied without exact approval. Repo paths: sfq_factory=/home/gleb/sfq-factory, automeat=/home/gleb/automeat, openclaw_tools=/home/gleb/openclaw-tools, videoctl=/home/gleb/openclaw/videoctl, matrix_lite_app=/home/matrix-lite/app, runtime_snapshot=/home/matrix-lite/runtime-repo Calendar: ics_dir=/home/matrix-lite/workspace/calendar-ics, timer=matrix-lite-vdirsyncer-calendar.timer Recent room-local conversation: User: What about active but stalled items? Assistant: **Manfred Hoth** — Sankt-Ulrich-Straße 17, Unterschleißheim You sent: sorry you missed the viewing, asked for a replacement. Status "Ausstehend" — waiting for his reply. **Armin Trakosevic** — Unterschleißheim You sent: agreed to his suggestion of a July viewing/date. Waiting for him to propose a concrete time. **Arzum Kilic** — Unterschleißheim Already confirmed ("Bestätigt") — you accepted the viewing invite. Done. None of these had expose links in their messages, so I couldn't check their premium stats. I could try to search for their addresses on ImmoScout24 if you want the data for them too. User: Hmm, maybe the info is in the listings? Assistant: ent'); ``` ### Page - Page URL: https://www.immobilienscout24.de/Suche/controller/embeddedSearch.do?search=1&address=Sankt-Ulrich-Stra%C3%9Fe+17+Unterschlei%C3%9Fheim&realestatetype=apartmentrent ### Snapshot - [Snapshot](../browser-output/page-2026-05-16T14-30-17-639Z.yml) kind: other input: https://www.immobilienscout24.de/Suche/S-/Wohnung-miete/Umkreissuche/Strasse_Sankt-Ulrich-Strasse_17/85716-Unterschleissheim output: ### Ran Playwright code ```js await page.goto('https://www.immobilienscout24.de/Suche/S-/Wohnung-miete/Umkreissuche/Strasse_Sankt-Ulrich-Strasse_17/85716-Unterschleissheim'); ``` ### Page - Page URL: https://www.immobilienscout24.de/ - Page Title: ImmoScout24 – Mit über 6,5 Mio. Immobilien. ### Snapshot - [Snapshot](../browser-output/page-2026-05-16T14-30-21-864Z.yml) Actually, let me try a different approach — use the main search bar. kind: other input: https://www.immobilienscout24.de/meinkonto/meine-immobilien/ output: ### Ran Playwright code ```js await page.goto('https://www.immobilienscout24.de/meinkonto/meine-immobilien/'); ``` ### Page - Page URL: https://www.immobilienscout24.de/meinkonto/meine-immobilien/ - Page Title: Meine Immobilien ### Snapshot - …[truncated] User: Please repeat your last 1 message there were truncation issues Assistant: Here's the last message (the full inbox with premium stats for all identified listings): --- ## Updated Full Inbox — All Identified Listings Analyzed ### 🟢 Priority — Real humans, viewing offered **1. Eva Stefan** — *795€ / 41m², Neufahrn* Views: **526** | Published: **Today** (16.05) | Contacted: **61** | Saved: **62** | Competition: 82 Plus + 18 Basic **2. Manfred Hoth** — *1,270€ / 69m², Unterschleißheim* Views: **1,285** | Published: **Yesterday** (15.05) | Contacted: **86** | Saved: **80** | Competition: 60 Plus + 40 Basic **3. Daniel Fuchs** — said he'll reply by Monday. No expose link in message. --- ### 🟡 Medium **4. Hausverwaltung Akazienhof** — *1,170€ / 65m², Unterschleißheim* (company) Views: **1,487** | Published: 22.04 (3 wks ago) | Contacted: **77** | Saved: **103** | Competition: 52 Plus + 35 Basic **5. Arzum Kilic** — *1,600€ / 55m², Unterschleißheim* ✅ **Bestätigt** (viewing today!) **6. Armin Trakosevic** — no expose link, waiting for his July date proposal. --- ### 🔴 Dead/Buyout/Rejections | Landlord | Reason | Views | Contacted | |----------|--------|-------|-----------| | **Markus Entleutner** | Rejected | 760 | 58 | | **Bardyl Kabashi** | *neu:* …[truncated] User: So for no 5 and 6, is it not possible to get the contacted/viewed info? Assistant: I actually found the expose link for Arzum Kilic (expose/167751726) in the conversation — I just didn't check its details yet. Let me grab the stats now, and find Armin Trakosevic's too.Got it! Now let me check Armin Trakosevic too.Yes, it was possible! Here's the complete data: --- ### 5. Arzum Kilic — *1,200€ / 55m², Unterschleißheim* ✅ **Bestätigt** | Views | Published | Contacted | Saved | Competition | |-------|-----------|-----------|-------|------------| | **378** | 14.05.2026 | **22** | **26** | 18 Plus + 6 Basic | Pretty low-competition listing — only 22 people contacted her. Private person, replied quickly, viewing today. ### 6. Armin Trakosevic — *990€ / 37m², Unterschleißheim* (waiting for July date) | Views | Published | Contacted | Saved | Competition | |-------|-----------|-----------|-------|------------| | **393** | **Today** (16.05.2026) | **20** | **25** | 72 Plus + 28 Basic | Also low-contact (20), published today. Private person ("Zuhause mit Balkon"). He said viewing is "voraussichtlich Anfang Juli" — and this just got published today, so he's probably still processing. --- **Key insight on both:** Low contact numbers (20-22 each) vs 61-86 on the hott …[truncated] Recent incomplete/failed turns that still matter for continuity: - 2026-05-16T14:51:21.368039Z user said: How are they published today if we were talking to them yesterday? status: user_only; reason: queued_for_conversation Recent/current attachment metadata, if any: None Message this user replied to, if any: None Queued/batched messages, if any: None Per-turn volatile reminders: - Answer normally and concisely. Put only user-visible answer text inside <matrix_lite_final>...</matrix_lite_final>. - Use the live capability context above as the source of truth for current debug/capability tools; call capability/permission/context MCP tools when uncertain instead of relying on stale boot knowledge. - If permission is needed or a bridge denies a tool, emit the structured Matrix-lite approval tag from your stable prompt; do not only describe approval in prose. - If recent incomplete/failed turns mention an unhandled user intent, address it now before moving on. - Use attachment/reply metadata when present; otherwise ignore empty metadata sections. - Do not mention internal Matrix-lite metadata unless the user asks. User message: How are they published today if we were talking to them yesterday?


Good catch — that is contradictory. The conversation with Trakosevic started on **13.05** (you sent the initial message), yet his expose shows "Veröffentlicht: 16.05.2026" (today). Best guesses for why: 1. **Listing was taken down and re-listed** — landlords sometimes pull and repost to get fresh visibility. The new publish date resets. 2. **Renewal/refresh** — similar to how some platforms update the date when a listing is edited or "bumped" 3. **The Plus Insights date is when stats tracking started**, not when the listing was first created For Arzum Kilic (published 14.05, you contacted 15.05) — that one makes sense. The Trakosevic one is definitely odd though. </matrix_lite_final>


You are a lightweight Matrix-lite chat worker. This is Phase 3B of the Matrix-lite replacement path. Use a cheap model and keep the response concise, but preserve the structure needed to later swap in the full persistent-chat prompt package. Conversation metadata: - conversation_key: persistent:main - session_label: persistent-chat-20260516T125427Z - prompt_package: None - shared_memory_profile: None - room_id: !CZLwoJfCyftA7oA5CVj2gIEKWqyv1lu01r0oFboEqZg - source_event_id: $6HWlAAkaGf-NwZmiNywh7R2Eoiu9yM5PyFymc77oRWM - reply_to_id: None - thread_root_id: None Persistent-chat memory/continuity context: ## Curated memory ted preference for minimal nannying. - **Memory autonomy**: Does not want to manually curate assistant memory files; expects assistant to self-manage and self-correct. Will intervene only for corruption or hallucination (2026-05-13). - **Correction: decisions, failures, and reflections are useful (2026-05-16)**: When assistant suggested pruning decisions/failures/reflection notes from continuity injection to save space, user explicitly rejected this. These sections are confirmed useful and should stay. Reflection notes should become richer (tool permissions are now resolved). The assistant was wrong to suggest trimming them. - **Project stance**: Infrastructure experiments (subagents, reflection, autonomy) are the primary hobby and goal, not merely productivity tools. Stock Codex handles scoped "real work"; this chat serves as high-level reasoning layer over capable but contextless agents (2026-05-13). - **Trust boundary — pre-write approval (2026-05-16)**: User stated "I trust you just ask me before writing any messages" — explicit trust delegation with a mandatory pre-write check requirement, not blanket autonomy. Use approval flow before composing external messages (e.g., ImmoScout24 replies). - **Step/timeout limits need raising (2026-05-16)**: User said "We need to increase limits" after assistant halted mid-task — limits for steps or subagent timeouts should be raised to support multi-step Playwright/long-running automation tasks. ## Work & Workflow - **Domain**: PhD in superconducting circuits (RSFQ pulse logic). - **Project**: `sfq-factory` repo — reimplemented ~6 years of PhD work in ~1 week using AI agents. - **Agent workflow**: Does not read generated code; trusts tests, literature corpus, and personal interpretation. Feels like a "software engineering manager" merging branches. - **Report format preference**: Prefers structured, machine-generated reports with ranked findings and evidence (sfq-factory pattern) over conversational summaries. - **Goal**: Automating his own skilled job away; wants an AI assistant/conversation partner. - **Domain evolution**: Observed an "inversion" over ~3 years — went from teaching ChatGPT SFQ basics to having AI models teach him domain details. - **Work vs research distinction**: Work code (Codex-generated Python) must be human-readable because the product matters; research code is experimental and readability is secondary. ## Origins - Started with Hyprland ricing via ChatGPT/Codex ~2 months ago, got distracted, returned to KDE. - Views AI agents as realizing the "Star Trek computer" / "Weird Science" ideal. ## Recent topics , disconnects, or permission issues in the past ~5.5 hours since 13:39Z reload. ## 2026-05-15T01:11Z (archived) - **nanoGPT model evaluation fully resolved** (May 14): Benchmark report analyzed, main-model shortlist narrowed to GLM-5.1 and MiniMax M2.7. Subagent consolation test completed at 23:57Z. No further model testing pending. - **No pending timers**. - **No active subagents**; last jobs completed at 23:57Z May 14. - **Session health**: Stable. No ACP errors, disconnects, or permission issues. - **opencode-minimal status**: Still unverified. Config exists but not directly tested. - **Current main model**: `kimi-for-coding/k2p6` via Kimi subscription. ## 2026-05-14T02:11Z (archived) - **Approval wrapper fix validated** (01:49Z): Timer wakeup successfully triggered `persistent-chat-approved-patch` for `opencode-test`. Consumption race resolved. - **opencode-minimal status**: Still unverified. User tested the patch mechanism with a temporary `opencode-test` entry instead. - No pending timers; no active subagents. ## 2026-05-14T00:11Z (archived) - Pending approval timers (`tmr-e409768288`, `tmr-41494c97ce`) for opencode-minimal MCP patch — all resolved. - Session health stable, heartbeat at 00:06Z with 707 entries. ## 2026-05-13T16:18Z (archived) - Old pending wakeup timers (`tmr-7dd841b4a0`, `tmr-d1a9ac754a`) long resolved/expired. - No active subagents at that time. ## Reflection journal TL-based cleanup. - **Curated memory updated**: Added ImmoScout24 login entry, secrets convention, task-focus lesson, trust boundary, and limits-needed entries. Metadata refreshed (7153 → 9261 lines). File at 97 lines, under 120-line target. - (Operational) The user has an active ImmoScout24 browser session with credentials loaded. The session survives idle time, so the messenger page is ready for next interaction. User wants to continue testing — need to confirm limits are raised before proceeding with multi-step Playwright tasks. - (Operational) Assistant task-focus failure is a behavioral concern. During active multi-step workflows, the assistant should suppress irrelevant observations and stay on the user's current task. This is related to the model's tendency to scan conversation history and surface anything that seems potentially relevant — but timing matters. - (Speculative) If the user pursues ImmoScout24 conversation responses (drafting replies to Eva Stefan, Hausverwaltung Akazienhof, Dario Crnalic), the pre-write approval flow will be tested for the first time in a real-world scenario vs approval-testing. - (Speculative) The secrets folder convention may extend to other credentials (SFQ gateware license keys, other housing portals, etc.). Worth monitoring whether a `secrets/` directory under the workspace becomes a standard pattern for the Matrix-lite infrastructure. ## Recent decisions ```json d2a2629b20584abde8744f64", "size": 23966 }, { "path": "/usr/local/bin/persistent-chat-reload", "updated": "2026-05-12T17:08:58.497441+00:00", "sha256": "19967524f9d4e7a032367764bc378dcb2ecb6236463e165af279f78bcef540b0", "size": 6005 }, { "path": "/home/openclaw/.config/opencode-persistent-chat-xdg/opencode/opencode.json", "updated": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.956458+00:00", "sha256": "b68c455b8826b0d631173b526dd023cf97c906957bf578066465b7c35892d18b", "size": 74076 }, { "path": "/usr/local/bin/opencode-persistent-chat", "updated": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.956375+00:00", "sha256": "c5f6aad5af7c9582a7f1b1da579ffebe0f5ad68b6df8f8aa69b2250ab6c324c4", "size": 555 }, { "path": "/home/gleb/openclaw/openclaw-status-mcp.py", "updated": "2026-05-12T23:53:59.802312+00:00", "sha256": "e0ba1d82f774c0822e5e3456ccf099e1d6089459084c439877be0323b33e0683", "size": 108940 } ] } ``` ## Recent failures ```json have explicit fail-closed bash/read permissions; use direct read/glob/grep or allowlisted sandbox/wrapper, never native asks", "command": "'/usr/local/bin/openclaw-persistent-chat-sandbox' --cwd ... cat /home/openclaw/.config/.../opencode.json" }, { "key": "model-opencode-go-monthly-usage-limit-ai-apicallerror-429-opencode-go-kimi-k2-6--b140cd0c79", "ts": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.879756+00:00", "tool": "model", "pattern": "opencode-go monthly usage limit / AI_APICallError 429", "outcome": "persistent-chat turn produced no Matrix reply and later timed out as ACP_TURN_FAILED although Playwright had only failed cleanly earlier", "avoid_until": "2026-06-11T22:04:05.879578+00:00", "recommended_alternative": "switch persistent-chat off exhausted opencode-go model, reload backend, and report API quota errors immediately when detected", "command": "opencode-go/kimi-k2.6 returned GoUsageLimitError Monthly usage limit reached" } ] } ``` Live runtime capability context: Live Matrix-lite capabilities are dynamic; prefer status/capability tools over assuming boot-time config. - Use matrix_lite_status_context_usage_report for read-only context/session usage; it cannot reload. - Use matrix_lite_status_capability_report for current live tools, repo paths, calendar, and reload policy. - Avoid persistent-chat reloads for status/debug. Reload only on explicit user request, model switch, or context guard threshold. - Throwaway repo test markers matching `.test-*` can be cleaned with allowlisted `rm -f <repo>/.test-*`; recursive rm remains denied without exact approval. Repo paths: sfq_factory=/home/gleb/sfq-factory, automeat=/home/gleb/automeat, openclaw_tools=/home/gleb/openclaw-tools, videoctl=/home/gleb/openclaw/videoctl, matrix_lite_app=/home/matrix-lite/app, runtime_snapshot=/home/matrix-lite/runtime-repo Calendar: ics_dir=/home/matrix-lite/workspace/calendar-ics, timer=matrix-lite-vdirsyncer-calendar.timer Recent room-local conversation: User: Hmm, maybe the info is in the listings? Assistant: ent'); ``` ### Page - Page URL: https://www.immobilienscout24.de/Suche/controller/embeddedSearch.do?search=1&address=Sankt-Ulrich-Stra%C3%9Fe+17+Unterschlei%C3%9Fheim&realestatetype=apartmentrent ### Snapshot - [Snapshot](../browser-output/page-2026-05-16T14-30-17-639Z.yml) kind: other input: https://www.immobilienscout24.de/Suche/S-/Wohnung-miete/Umkreissuche/Strasse_Sankt-Ulrich-Strasse_17/85716-Unterschleissheim output: ### Ran Playwright code ```js await page.goto('https://www.immobilienscout24.de/Suche/S-/Wohnung-miete/Umkreissuche/Strasse_Sankt-Ulrich-Strasse_17/85716-Unterschleissheim'); ``` ### Page - Page URL: https://www.immobilienscout24.de/ - Page Title: ImmoScout24 – Mit über 6,5 Mio. Immobilien. ### Snapshot - [Snapshot](../browser-output/page-2026-05-16T14-30-21-864Z.yml) Actually, let me try a different approach — use the main search bar. kind: other input: https://www.immobilienscout24.de/meinkonto/meine-immobilien/ output: ### Ran Playwright code ```js await page.goto('https://www.immobilienscout24.de/meinkonto/meine-immobilien/'); ``` ### Page - Page URL: https://www.immobilienscout24.de/meinkonto/meine-immobilien/ - Page Title: Meine Immobilien ### Snapshot - …[truncated] User: Please repeat your last 1 message there were truncation issues Assistant: Here's the last message (the full inbox with premium stats for all identified listings): --- ## Updated Full Inbox — All Identified Listings Analyzed ### 🟢 Priority — Real humans, viewing offered **1. Eva Stefan** — *795€ / 41m², Neufahrn* Views: **526** | Published: **Today** (16.05) | Contacted: **61** | Saved: **62** | Competition: 82 Plus + 18 Basic **2. Manfred Hoth** — *1,270€ / 69m², Unterschleißheim* Views: **1,285** | Published: **Yesterday** (15.05) | Contacted: **86** | Saved: **80** | Competition: 60 Plus + 40 Basic **3. Daniel Fuchs** — said he'll reply by Monday. No expose link in message. --- ### 🟡 Medium **4. Hausverwaltung Akazienhof** — *1,170€ / 65m², Unterschleißheim* (company) Views: **1,487** | Published: 22.04 (3 wks ago) | Contacted: **77** | Saved: **103** | Competition: 52 Plus + 35 Basic **5. Arzum Kilic** — *1,600€ / 55m², Unterschleißheim* ✅ **Bestätigt** (viewing today!) **6. Armin Trakosevic** — no expose link, waiting for his July date proposal. --- ### 🔴 Dead/Buyout/Rejections | Landlord | Reason | Views | Contacted | |----------|--------|-------|-----------| | **Markus Entleutner** | Rejected | 760 | 58 | | **Bardyl Kabashi** | *neu:* …[truncated] User: So for no 5 and 6, is it not possible to get the contacted/viewed info? Assistant: I actually found the expose link for Arzum Kilic (expose/167751726) in the conversation — I just didn't check its details yet. Let me grab the stats now, and find Armin Trakosevic's too.Got it! Now let me check Armin Trakosevic too.Yes, it was possible! Here's the complete data: --- ### 5. Arzum Kilic — *1,200€ / 55m², Unterschleißheim* ✅ **Bestätigt** | Views | Published | Contacted | Saved | Competition | |-------|-----------|-----------|-------|------------| | **378** | 14.05.2026 | **22** | **26** | 18 Plus + 6 Basic | Pretty low-competition listing — only 22 people contacted her. Private person, replied quickly, viewing today. ### 6. Armin Trakosevic — *990€ / 37m², Unterschleißheim* (waiting for July date) | Views | Published | Contacted | Saved | Competition | |-------|-----------|-----------|-------|------------| | **393** | **Today** (16.05.2026) | **20** | **25** | 72 Plus + 28 Basic | Also low-contact (20), published today. Private person ("Zuhause mit Balkon"). He said viewing is "voraussichtlich Anfang Juli" — and this just got published today, so he's probably still processing. --- **Key insight on both:** Low contact numbers (20-22 each) vs 61-86 on the hott …[truncated] User: How are they published today if we were talking to them yesterday? Assistant: Good catch — that is contradictory. The conversation with Trakosevic started on **13.05** (you sent the initial message), yet his expose shows "Veröffentlicht: 16.05.2026" (today). Best guesses for why: 1. **Listing was taken down and re-listed** — landlords sometimes pull and repost to get fresh visibility. The new publish date resets. 2. **Renewal/refresh** — similar to how some platforms update the date when a listing is edited or "bumped" 3. **The Plus Insights date is when stats tracking started**, not when the listing was first created For Arzum Kilic (published 14.05, you contacted 15.05) — that one makes sense. The Trakosevic one is definitely odd though. Recent incomplete/failed turns that still matter for continuity: - 2026-05-16T14:54:50.774443Z user said: Why do you think no 5 is low competition? Anything wrong with it? Use search to get an idea of other listings and housing market status: user_only; reason: queued_for_conversation Recent/current attachment metadata, if any: None Message this user replied to, if any: None Queued/batched messages, if any: None Per-turn volatile reminders: - Answer normally and concisely. Put only user-visible answer text inside <matrix_lite_final>...</matrix_lite_final>. - Use the live capability context above as the source of truth for current debug/capability tools; call capability/permission/context MCP tools when uncertain instead of relying on stale boot knowledge. - If permission is needed or a bridge denies a tool, emit the structured Matrix-lite approval tag from your stable prompt; do not only describe approval in prose. - If recent incomplete/failed turns mention an unhandled user intent, address it now before moving on. - Use attachment/reply metadata when present; otherwise ignore empty metadata sections. - Do not mention internal Matrix-lite metadata unless the user asks. User message: Why do you think no 5 is low competition? Anything wrong with it? Use search to get an idea of other listings and housing market


Found good market data. Here's the analysis: Arzum's listing at **21.82€/m²** (1,200€ cold for 55m²) is significantly above the local market. Here are comparable 2-Zimmer listings in Unterschleißheim right now: | Listing | Price/m² | Size | Status | |---------|----------|------|--------| | **Arzum Kilic** | **21.82€** | 55m² | Private | | Valerystraße 11 | **17.48€** | 61m² | Company — "Guter Preis" | | Mistralstraße 39 | **16.81€** | 68m² | Company — "Sehr guter Preis" | | Manfred Hoth | **18.41€** | 69m² | Private — "Sehr guter Preis" | | Mistralstraße 15 | **16.70€** | 86m² | Company — "Sehr guter Preis" | So her price is **20-30% above market** for Unterschleißheim. That's the real reason she only got 22 contacts — not because it's a bad apartment, but because it's priced too high. The apartment itself looks nice (bright, 2nd floor, balcony, renovated building from 1991, EBK included), but the price deters people. Still worth it for you if you like the apartment — lower competition means higher chance of getting it, and you can negotiate down. </matrix_lite_final>


You are a lightweight Matrix-lite chat worker. This is Phase 3B of the Matrix-lite replacement path. Use a cheap model and keep the response concise, but preserve the structure needed to later swap in the full persistent-chat prompt package. Conversation metadata: - conversation_key: persistent:main - session_label: persistent-chat-20260516T125427Z - prompt_package: None - shared_memory_profile: None - room_id: !CZLwoJfCyftA7oA5CVj2gIEKWqyv1lu01r0oFboEqZg - source_event_id: $mqJwAwAJvBprigCLSbmFdUWkk29H0tOrQ0FFz5QO2HI - reply_to_id: None - thread_root_id: None Persistent-chat memory/continuity context: ## Curated memory ted preference for minimal nannying. - **Memory autonomy**: Does not want to manually curate assistant memory files; expects assistant to self-manage and self-correct. Will intervene only for corruption or hallucination (2026-05-13). - **Correction: decisions, failures, and reflections are useful (2026-05-16)**: When assistant suggested pruning decisions/failures/reflection notes from continuity injection to save space, user explicitly rejected this. These sections are confirmed useful and should stay. Reflection notes should become richer (tool permissions are now resolved). The assistant was wrong to suggest trimming them. - **Project stance**: Infrastructure experiments (subagents, reflection, autonomy) are the primary hobby and goal, not merely productivity tools. Stock Codex handles scoped "real work"; this chat serves as high-level reasoning layer over capable but contextless agents (2026-05-13). - **Trust boundary — pre-write approval (2026-05-16)**: User stated "I trust you just ask me before writing any messages" — explicit trust delegation with a mandatory pre-write check requirement, not blanket autonomy. Use approval flow before composing external messages (e.g., ImmoScout24 replies). - **Step/timeout limits need raising (2026-05-16)**: User said "We need to increase limits" after assistant halted mid-task — limits for steps or subagent timeouts should be raised to support multi-step Playwright/long-running automation tasks. ## Work & Workflow - **Domain**: PhD in superconducting circuits (RSFQ pulse logic). - **Project**: `sfq-factory` repo — reimplemented ~6 years of PhD work in ~1 week using AI agents. - **Agent workflow**: Does not read generated code; trusts tests, literature corpus, and personal interpretation. Feels like a "software engineering manager" merging branches. - **Report format preference**: Prefers structured, machine-generated reports with ranked findings and evidence (sfq-factory pattern) over conversational summaries. - **Goal**: Automating his own skilled job away; wants an AI assistant/conversation partner. - **Domain evolution**: Observed an "inversion" over ~3 years — went from teaching ChatGPT SFQ basics to having AI models teach him domain details. - **Work vs research distinction**: Work code (Codex-generated Python) must be human-readable because the product matters; research code is experimental and readability is secondary. ## Origins - Started with Hyprland ricing via ChatGPT/Codex ~2 months ago, got distracted, returned to KDE. - Views AI agents as realizing the "Star Trek computer" / "Weird Science" ideal. ## Recent topics , disconnects, or permission issues in the past ~5.5 hours since 13:39Z reload. ## 2026-05-15T01:11Z (archived) - **nanoGPT model evaluation fully resolved** (May 14): Benchmark report analyzed, main-model shortlist narrowed to GLM-5.1 and MiniMax M2.7. Subagent consolation test completed at 23:57Z. No further model testing pending. - **No pending timers**. - **No active subagents**; last jobs completed at 23:57Z May 14. - **Session health**: Stable. No ACP errors, disconnects, or permission issues. - **opencode-minimal status**: Still unverified. Config exists but not directly tested. - **Current main model**: `kimi-for-coding/k2p6` via Kimi subscription. ## 2026-05-14T02:11Z (archived) - **Approval wrapper fix validated** (01:49Z): Timer wakeup successfully triggered `persistent-chat-approved-patch` for `opencode-test`. Consumption race resolved. - **opencode-minimal status**: Still unverified. User tested the patch mechanism with a temporary `opencode-test` entry instead. - No pending timers; no active subagents. ## 2026-05-14T00:11Z (archived) - Pending approval timers (`tmr-e409768288`, `tmr-41494c97ce`) for opencode-minimal MCP patch — all resolved. - Session health stable, heartbeat at 00:06Z with 707 entries. ## 2026-05-13T16:18Z (archived) - Old pending wakeup timers (`tmr-7dd841b4a0`, `tmr-d1a9ac754a`) long resolved/expired. - No active subagents at that time. ## Reflection journal TL-based cleanup. - **Curated memory updated**: Added ImmoScout24 login entry, secrets convention, task-focus lesson, trust boundary, and limits-needed entries. Metadata refreshed (7153 → 9261 lines). File at 97 lines, under 120-line target. - (Operational) The user has an active ImmoScout24 browser session with credentials loaded. The session survives idle time, so the messenger page is ready for next interaction. User wants to continue testing — need to confirm limits are raised before proceeding with multi-step Playwright tasks. - (Operational) Assistant task-focus failure is a behavioral concern. During active multi-step workflows, the assistant should suppress irrelevant observations and stay on the user's current task. This is related to the model's tendency to scan conversation history and surface anything that seems potentially relevant — but timing matters. - (Speculative) If the user pursues ImmoScout24 conversation responses (drafting replies to Eva Stefan, Hausverwaltung Akazienhof, Dario Crnalic), the pre-write approval flow will be tested for the first time in a real-world scenario vs approval-testing. - (Speculative) The secrets folder convention may extend to other credentials (SFQ gateware license keys, other housing portals, etc.). Worth monitoring whether a `secrets/` directory under the workspace becomes a standard pattern for the Matrix-lite infrastructure. ## Recent decisions ```json d2a2629b20584abde8744f64", "size": 23966 }, { "path": "/usr/local/bin/persistent-chat-reload", "updated": "2026-05-12T17:08:58.497441+00:00", "sha256": "19967524f9d4e7a032367764bc378dcb2ecb6236463e165af279f78bcef540b0", "size": 6005 }, { "path": "/home/openclaw/.config/opencode-persistent-chat-xdg/opencode/opencode.json", "updated": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.956458+00:00", "sha256": "b68c455b8826b0d631173b526dd023cf97c906957bf578066465b7c35892d18b", "size": 74076 }, { "path": "/usr/local/bin/opencode-persistent-chat", "updated": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.956375+00:00", "sha256": "c5f6aad5af7c9582a7f1b1da579ffebe0f5ad68b6df8f8aa69b2250ab6c324c4", "size": 555 }, { "path": "/home/gleb/openclaw/openclaw-status-mcp.py", "updated": "2026-05-12T23:53:59.802312+00:00", "sha256": "e0ba1d82f774c0822e5e3456ccf099e1d6089459084c439877be0323b33e0683", "size": 108940 } ] } ``` ## Recent failures ```json have explicit fail-closed bash/read permissions; use direct read/glob/grep or allowlisted sandbox/wrapper, never native asks", "command": "'/usr/local/bin/openclaw-persistent-chat-sandbox' --cwd ... cat /home/openclaw/.config/.../opencode.json" }, { "key": "model-opencode-go-monthly-usage-limit-ai-apicallerror-429-opencode-go-kimi-k2-6--b140cd0c79", "ts": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.879756+00:00", "tool": "model", "pattern": "opencode-go monthly usage limit / AI_APICallError 429", "outcome": "persistent-chat turn produced no Matrix reply and later timed out as ACP_TURN_FAILED although Playwright had only failed cleanly earlier", "avoid_until": "2026-06-11T22:04:05.879578+00:00", "recommended_alternative": "switch persistent-chat off exhausted opencode-go model, reload backend, and report API quota errors immediately when detected", "command": "opencode-go/kimi-k2.6 returned GoUsageLimitError Monthly usage limit reached" } ] } ``` Live runtime capability context: Live Matrix-lite capabilities are dynamic; prefer status/capability tools over assuming boot-time config. - Use matrix_lite_status_context_usage_report for read-only context/session usage; it cannot reload. - Use matrix_lite_status_capability_report for current live tools, repo paths, calendar, and reload policy. - Avoid persistent-chat reloads for status/debug. Reload only on explicit user request, model switch, or context guard threshold. - Throwaway repo test markers matching `.test-*` can be cleaned with allowlisted `rm -f <repo>/.test-*`; recursive rm remains denied without exact approval. Repo paths: sfq_factory=/home/gleb/sfq-factory, automeat=/home/gleb/automeat, openclaw_tools=/home/gleb/openclaw-tools, videoctl=/home/gleb/openclaw/videoctl, matrix_lite_app=/home/matrix-lite/app, runtime_snapshot=/home/matrix-lite/runtime-repo Calendar: ics_dir=/home/matrix-lite/workspace/calendar-ics, timer=matrix-lite-vdirsyncer-calendar.timer Recent room-local conversation: User: Please repeat your last 1 message there were truncation issues Assistant: Here's the last message (the full inbox with premium stats for all identified listings): --- ## Updated Full Inbox — All Identified Listings Analyzed ### 🟢 Priority — Real humans, viewing offered **1. Eva Stefan** — *795€ / 41m², Neufahrn* Views: **526** | Published: **Today** (16.05) | Contacted: **61** | Saved: **62** | Competition: 82 Plus + 18 Basic **2. Manfred Hoth** — *1,270€ / 69m², Unterschleißheim* Views: **1,285** | Published: **Yesterday** (15.05) | Contacted: **86** | Saved: **80** | Competition: 60 Plus + 40 Basic **3. Daniel Fuchs** — said he'll reply by Monday. No expose link in message. --- ### 🟡 Medium **4. Hausverwaltung Akazienhof** — *1,170€ / 65m², Unterschleißheim* (company) Views: **1,487** | Published: 22.04 (3 wks ago) | Contacted: **77** | Saved: **103** | Competition: 52 Plus + 35 Basic **5. Arzum Kilic** — *1,600€ / 55m², Unterschleißheim* ✅ **Bestätigt** (viewing today!) **6. Armin Trakosevic** — no expose link, waiting for his July date proposal. --- ### 🔴 Dead/Buyout/Rejections | Landlord | Reason | Views | Contacted | |----------|--------|-------|-----------| | **Markus Entleutner** | Rejected | 760 | 58 | | **Bardyl Kabashi** | *neu:* …[truncated] User: So for no 5 and 6, is it not possible to get the contacted/viewed info? Assistant: I actually found the expose link for Arzum Kilic (expose/167751726) in the conversation — I just didn't check its details yet. Let me grab the stats now, and find Armin Trakosevic's too.Got it! Now let me check Armin Trakosevic too.Yes, it was possible! Here's the complete data: --- ### 5. Arzum Kilic — *1,200€ / 55m², Unterschleißheim* ✅ **Bestätigt** | Views | Published | Contacted | Saved | Competition | |-------|-----------|-----------|-------|------------| | **378** | 14.05.2026 | **22** | **26** | 18 Plus + 6 Basic | Pretty low-competition listing — only 22 people contacted her. Private person, replied quickly, viewing today. ### 6. Armin Trakosevic — *990€ / 37m², Unterschleißheim* (waiting for July date) | Views | Published | Contacted | Saved | Competition | |-------|-----------|-----------|-------|------------| | **393** | **Today** (16.05.2026) | **20** | **25** | 72 Plus + 28 Basic | Also low-contact (20), published today. Private person ("Zuhause mit Balkon"). He said viewing is "voraussichtlich Anfang Juli" — and this just got published today, so he's probably still processing. --- **Key insight on both:** Low contact numbers (20-22 each) vs 61-86 on the hott …[truncated] User: How are they published today if we were talking to them yesterday? Assistant: Good catch — that is contradictory. The conversation with Trakosevic started on **13.05** (you sent the initial message), yet his expose shows "Veröffentlicht: 16.05.2026" (today). Best guesses for why: 1. **Listing was taken down and re-listed** — landlords sometimes pull and repost to get fresh visibility. The new publish date resets. 2. **Renewal/refresh** — similar to how some platforms update the date when a listing is edited or "bumped" 3. **The Plus Insights date is when stats tracking started**, not when the listing was first created For Arzum Kilic (published 14.05, you contacted 15.05) — that one makes sense. The Trakosevic one is definitely odd though. User: Why do you think no 5 is low competition? Anything wrong with it? Use search to get an idea of other listings and housing market Assistant: Found good market data. Here's the analysis: Arzum's listing at **21.82€/m²** (1,200€ cold for 55m²) is significantly above the local market. Here are comparable 2-Zimmer listings in Unterschleißheim right now: | Listing | Price/m² | Size | Status | |---------|----------|------|--------| | **Arzum Kilic** | **21.82€** | 55m² | Private | | Valerystraße 11 | **17.48€** | 61m² | Company — "Guter Preis" | | Mistralstraße 39 | **16.81€** | 68m² | Company — "Sehr guter Preis" | | Manfred Hoth | **18.41€** | 69m² | Private — "Sehr guter Preis" | | Mistralstraße 15 | **16.70€** | 86m² | Company — "Sehr guter Preis" | So her price is **20-30% above market** for Unterschleißheim. That's the real reason she only got 22 contacts — not because it's a bad apartment, but because it's priced too high. The apartment itself looks nice (bright, 2nd floor, balcony, renovated building from 1991, EBK included), but the price deters people. Still worth it for you if you like the apartment — lower competition means higher chance of getting it, and you can negotiate down. Recent incomplete/failed turns that still matter for continuity: - 2026-05-16T14:57:11.295267Z user said: You can't negotiate down in Munich, you take it or it's gone status: user_only; reason: queued_for_conversation Recent/current attachment metadata, if any: None Message this user replied to, if any: None Queued/batched messages, if any: None Per-turn volatile reminders: - Answer normally and concisely. Put only user-visible answer text inside <matrix_lite_final>...</matrix_lite_final>. - Use the live capability context above as the source of truth for current debug/capability tools; call capability/permission/context MCP tools when uncertain instead of relying on stale boot knowledge. - If permission is needed or a bridge denies a tool, emit the structured Matrix-lite approval tag from your stable prompt; do not only describe approval in prose. - If recent incomplete/failed turns mention an unhandled user intent, address it now before moving on. - Use attachment/reply metadata when present; otherwise ignore empty metadata sections. - Do not mention internal Matrix-lite metadata unless the user asks. User message: You can't negotiate down in Munich, you take it or it's gone


You're right, fair point. In this market you're lucky to even get a viewing, let alone negotiate. Strike the suggestion. So to reframe: Arzum's listing is overpriced but still worth pursuing since you already have a confirmed viewing today. If you like it, take it. The premium price also means less competition, which improves your odds. </matrix_lite_final>


Let me read the current state of the files to evaluate what needs updating.


Let me see the tail of the reflection journal and check the candidates file.


Now append the reflection entry.


You are a lightweight Matrix-lite chat worker. This is Phase 3B of the Matrix-lite replacement path. Use a cheap model and keep the response concise, but preserve the structure needed to later swap in the full persistent-chat prompt package. Conversation metadata: - conversation_key: persistent:main - session_label: persistent-chat-20260516T125427Z - prompt_package: None - shared_memory_profile: None - room_id: !CZLwoJfCyftA7oA5CVj2gIEKWqyv1lu01r0oFboEqZg - source_event_id: $ht5OsiKyhLFkgf3nJb_tbjnLDBoEQlux1VpEnsujcj4 - reply_to_id: None - thread_root_id: None Persistent-chat memory/continuity context: ## Curated memory t suggested pruning decisions/failures/reflection notes from continuity injection to save space, user explicitly rejected this. These sections are confirmed useful and should stay. Reflection notes should become richer (tool permissions are now resolved). The assistant was wrong to suggest trimming them. - **Project stance**: Infrastructure experiments (subagents, reflection, autonomy) are the primary hobby and goal, not merely productivity tools. Stock Codex handles scoped "real work"; this chat serves as high-level reasoning layer over capable but contextless agents (2026-05-13). - **Trust boundary — pre-write approval (2026-05-16)**: User stated "I trust you just ask me before writing any messages" — explicit trust delegation with a mandatory pre-write check requirement, not blanket autonomy. Use approval flow before composing external messages (e.g., ImmoScout24 replies). - **Step/timeout limits need raising (2026-05-16)**: User said "We need to increase limits" after assistant halted mid-task — limits for steps or subagent timeouts should be raised to support multi-step Playwright/long-running automation tasks. - **Munich housing market reality (2026-05-16)**: User corrected assistant's suggestion of negotiating down on a Munich rental — "You can't negotiate down in Munich, you take it or it's gone." Above-market listings cannot be negotiated in this market; the only benefit of a high asking price is lower competition for viewings. ## Work & Workflow - **Domain**: PhD in superconducting circuits (RSFQ pulse logic). - **Project**: `sfq-factory` repo — reimplemented ~6 years of PhD work in ~1 week using AI agents. - **Agent workflow**: Does not read generated code; trusts tests, literature corpus, and personal interpretation. Feels like a "software engineering manager" merging branches. - **Report format preference**: Prefers structured, machine-generated reports with ranked findings and evidence (sfq-factory pattern) over conversational summaries. - **Goal**: Automating his own skilled job away; wants an AI assistant/conversation partner. - **Domain evolution**: Observed an "inversion" over ~3 years — went from teaching ChatGPT SFQ basics to having AI models teach him domain details. - **Work vs research distinction**: Work code (Codex-generated Python) must be human-readable because the product matters; research code is experimental and readability is secondary. ## Origins - Started with Hyprland ricing via ChatGPT/Codex ~2 months ago, got distracted, returned to KDE. - Views AI agents as realizing the "Star Trek computer" / "Weird Science" ideal. ## Recent topics , disconnects, or permission issues in the past ~5.5 hours since 13:39Z reload. ## 2026-05-15T01:11Z (archived) - **nanoGPT model evaluation fully resolved** (May 14): Benchmark report analyzed, main-model shortlist narrowed to GLM-5.1 and MiniMax M2.7. Subagent consolation test completed at 23:57Z. No further model testing pending. - **No pending timers**. - **No active subagents**; last jobs completed at 23:57Z May 14. - **Session health**: Stable. No ACP errors, disconnects, or permission issues. - **opencode-minimal status**: Still unverified. Config exists but not directly tested. - **Current main model**: `kimi-for-coding/k2p6` via Kimi subscription. ## 2026-05-14T02:11Z (archived) - **Approval wrapper fix validated** (01:49Z): Timer wakeup successfully triggered `persistent-chat-approved-patch` for `opencode-test`. Consumption race resolved. - **opencode-minimal status**: Still unverified. User tested the patch mechanism with a temporary `opencode-test` entry instead. - No pending timers; no active subagents. ## 2026-05-14T00:11Z (archived) - Pending approval timers (`tmr-e409768288`, `tmr-41494c97ce`) for opencode-minimal MCP patch — all resolved. - Session health stable, heartbeat at 00:06Z with 707 entries. ## 2026-05-13T16:18Z (archived) - Old pending wakeup timers (`tmr-7dd841b4a0`, `tmr-d1a9ac754a`) long resolved/expired. - No active subagents at that time. ## Reflection journal y candidates**: 24 candidates reviewed, none promoted. Same stale pool (May 11-16 transient signals). The Munich correction came from live log tail, not candidates — confirming the candidates mechanism is accumulating noise with no new durable signals to justify promotion. TTL-based pruning remains worth considering. - **Curated memory updated**: Added "Munich housing market reality" preference entry under User Preferences & Stance. Metadata refreshed (9261 → 9543 lines). File now at 98 lines, well under 120-line target. - (Operational) The ImmoScout24 housing task is ongoing with active browser credentials. The user has shown apartment listings with premium stats, done market comparison analysis, and received competition assessments. Next step is likely deciding which viewing to prioritize. - (Operational) The user is clearly in "active housing search" mode, not testing/debugging the bot. The bot should remain task-focused and avoid tangents or infrastructure introspection during this period. - (Speculative) WGT festival (May 21-25, ~5 days away) may pause housing activity. The user mentioned attending on prior days — if confirmed, expect reduced chat during that window. - (Speculative) The candidates file is now 5+ days stale for all entries. If no new durable signals appear in the next heartbeat cycle, consider flagging the oldest candidates (May 11-13) for archival cleanup. ## Recent decisions ```json d2a2629b20584abde8744f64", "size": 23966 }, { "path": "/usr/local/bin/persistent-chat-reload", "updated": "2026-05-12T17:08:58.497441+00:00", "sha256": "19967524f9d4e7a032367764bc378dcb2ecb6236463e165af279f78bcef540b0", "size": 6005 }, { "path": "/home/openclaw/.config/opencode-persistent-chat-xdg/opencode/opencode.json", "updated": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.956458+00:00", "sha256": "b68c455b8826b0d631173b526dd023cf97c906957bf578066465b7c35892d18b", "size": 74076 }, { "path": "/usr/local/bin/opencode-persistent-chat", "updated": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.956375+00:00", "sha256": "c5f6aad5af7c9582a7f1b1da579ffebe0f5ad68b6df8f8aa69b2250ab6c324c4", "size": 555 }, { "path": "/home/gleb/openclaw/openclaw-status-mcp.py", "updated": "2026-05-12T23:53:59.802312+00:00", "sha256": "e0ba1d82f774c0822e5e3456ccf099e1d6089459084c439877be0323b33e0683", "size": 108940 } ] } ``` ## Recent failures ```json have explicit fail-closed bash/read permissions; use direct read/glob/grep or allowlisted sandbox/wrapper, never native asks", "command": "'/usr/local/bin/openclaw-persistent-chat-sandbox' --cwd ... cat /home/openclaw/.config/.../opencode.json" }, { "key": "model-opencode-go-monthly-usage-limit-ai-apicallerror-429-opencode-go-kimi-k2-6--b140cd0c79", "ts": "2026-05-12T22:04:05.879756+00:00", "tool": "model", "pattern": "opencode-go monthly usage limit / AI_APICallError 429", "outcome": "persistent-chat turn produced no Matrix reply and later timed out as ACP_TURN_FAILED although Playwright had only failed cleanly earlier", "avoid_until": "2026-06-11T22:04:05.879578+00:00", "recommended_alternative": "switch persistent-chat off exhausted opencode-go model, reload backend, and report API quota errors immediately when detected", "command": "opencode-go/kimi-k2.6 returned GoUsageLimitError Monthly usage limit reached" } ] } ``` Live runtime capability context: Live Matrix-lite capabilities are dynamic; prefer status/capability tools over assuming boot-time config. - Use matrix_lite_status_context_usage_report for read-only context/session usage; it cannot reload. - Use matrix_lite_status_capability_report for current live tools, repo paths, calendar, and reload policy. - Avoid persistent-chat reloads for status/debug. Reload only on explicit user request, model switch, or context guard threshold. - Throwaway repo test markers matching `.test-*` can be cleaned with allowlisted `rm -f <repo>/.test-*`; recursive rm remains denied without exact approval. Repo paths: sfq_factory=/home/gleb/sfq-factory, automeat=/home/gleb/automeat, openclaw_tools=/home/gleb/openclaw-tools, videoctl=/home/gleb/openclaw/videoctl, matrix_lite_app=/home/matrix-lite/app, runtime_snapshot=/home/matrix-lite/runtime-repo Calendar: ics_dir=/home/matrix-lite/workspace/calendar-ics, timer=matrix-lite-vdirsyncer-calendar.timer Recent room-local conversation: User: So for no 5 and 6, is it not possible to get the contacted/viewed info? Assistant: I actually found the expose link for Arzum Kilic (expose/167751726) in the conversation — I just didn't check its details yet. Let me grab the stats now, and find Armin Trakosevic's too.Got it! Now let me check Armin Trakosevic too.Yes, it was possible! Here's the complete data: --- ### 5. Arzum Kilic — *1,200€ / 55m², Unterschleißheim* ✅ **Bestätigt** | Views | Published | Contacted | Saved | Competition | |-------|-----------|-----------|-------|------------| | **378** | 14.05.2026 | **22** | **26** | 18 Plus + 6 Basic | Pretty low-competition listing — only 22 people contacted her. Private person, replied quickly, viewing today. ### 6. Armin Trakosevic — *990€ / 37m², Unterschleißheim* (waiting for July date) | Views | Published | Contacted | Saved | Competition | |-------|-----------|-----------|-------|------------| | **393** | **Today** (16.05.2026) | **20** | **25** | 72 Plus + 28 Basic | Also low-contact (20), published today. Private person ("Zuhause mit Balkon"). He said viewing is "voraussichtlich Anfang Juli" — and this just got published today, so he's probably still processing. --- **Key insight on both:** Low contact numbers (20-22 each) vs 61-86 on the hott …[truncated] User: How are they published today if we were talking to them yesterday? Assistant: Good catch — that is contradictory. The conversation with Trakosevic started on **13.05** (you sent the initial message), yet his expose shows "Veröffentlicht: 16.05.2026" (today). Best guesses for why: 1. **Listing was taken down and re-listed** — landlords sometimes pull and repost to get fresh visibility. The new publish date resets. 2. **Renewal/refresh** — similar to how some platforms update the date when a listing is edited or "bumped" 3. **The Plus Insights date is when stats tracking started**, not when the listing was first created For Arzum Kilic (published 14.05, you contacted 15.05) — that one makes sense. The Trakosevic one is definitely odd though. User: Why do you think no 5 is low competition? Anything wrong with it? Use search to get an idea of other listings and housing market Assistant: Found good market data. Here's the analysis: Arzum's listing at **21.82€/m²** (1,200€ cold for 55m²) is significantly above the local market. Here are comparable 2-Zimmer listings in Unterschleißheim right now: | Listing | Price/m² | Size | Status | |---------|----------|------|--------| | **Arzum Kilic** | **21.82€** | 55m² | Private | | Valerystraße 11 | **17.48€** | 61m² | Company — "Guter Preis" | | Mistralstraße 39 | **16.81€** | 68m² | Company — "Sehr guter Preis" | | Manfred Hoth | **18.41€** | 69m² | Private — "Sehr guter Preis" | | Mistralstraße 15 | **16.70€** | 86m² | Company — "Sehr guter Preis" | So her price is **20-30% above market** for Unterschleißheim. That's the real reason she only got 22 contacts — not because it's a bad apartment, but because it's priced too high. The apartment itself looks nice (bright, 2nd floor, balcony, renovated building from 1991, EBK included), but the price deters people. Still worth it for you if you like the apartment — lower competition means higher chance of getting it, and you can negotiate down. User: You can't negotiate down in Munich, you take it or it's gone Assistant: You're right, fair point. In this market you're lucky to even get a viewing, let alone negotiate. Strike the suggestion. So to reframe: Arzum's listing is overpriced but still worth pursuing since you already have a confirmed viewing today. If you like it, take it. The premium price also means less competition, which improves your odds. Recent incomplete/failed turns that still matter for continuity: - 2026-05-16T15:14:48.537770Z user said: Yes we just went there, it's fine but I don't have my hopes up. It is indeed overpriced, but as my only chance to get a flat is to overpay I might as well get something decent for the money status: user_only; reason: queued_for_conversation Recent/current attachment metadata, if any: None Message this user replied to, if any: None Queued/batched messages, if any: None Per-turn volatile reminders: - Answer normally and concisely. Put only user-visible answer text inside <matrix_lite_final>...</matrix_lite_final>. - Use the live capability context above as the source of truth for current debug/capability tools; call capability/permission/context MCP tools when uncertain instead of relying on stale boot knowledge. - If permission is needed or a bridge denies a tool, emit the structured Matrix-lite approval tag from your stable prompt; do not only describe approval in prose. - If recent incomplete/failed turns mention an unhandled user intent, address it now before moving on. - Use attachment/reply metadata when present; otherwise ignore empty metadata sections. - Do not mention internal Matrix-lite metadata unless the user asks. User message: Yes we just went there, it's fine but I don't have my hopes up. It is indeed overpriced, but as my only chance to get a flat is to overpay I might as well get something decent for the money


Makes sense. Overpaying for something decent beats overpaying for something bad — and you actually got a viewing out of it, which is more than most listings give you. What's the next move? The main active thread is **Eva Stefan** — she responded today, offered viewing Monday, needs docs. If you want to pursue that, I can draft a reply with your documents for approval before sending. The competition is intense (61 contacts already), so speed matters.