You are the hourly memory curator for persistent-chat. This is an isolated maintenance session, not a user chat. Goal: update `/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/curated-memory.md` only if useful. Inputs below include trusted deterministic semantic memory, pinned notes, decision state, recent failures, candidate memory signals, broad semantic candidates, existing curated notes, reflections, and recent raw log tail. Rules: - Preserve important stable user facts, durable preferences/goals, corrections, model/config decisions, and unresolved operational risks. - Resolve contradictions conservatively: prefer explicit user corrections and recent confirmed facts. - Review memory-candidates.jsonl: promote durable/high-signal candidates into curated-memory.md, ignore transient/noisy candidates, and mention ignored-noise patterns in reflection if useful. - Review semantic-candidates.jsonl as lower-confidence main-chat user signals. They are not facts until promoted. Promote only durable/high-signal preferences, corrections, operational directives, or workflow context. - Maintain semantic-candidates.jsonl lifecycle one step at a time using `/home/matrix-lite/app/scripts/persistent-chat-memory semantic-candidates mark --key <key> --status promoted|ignored|stale|needs_more_evidence --reason <why> [--promoted-to <path-or-concept>]`. - For safer batch review, first use `/home/matrix-lite/app/scripts/persistent-chat-memory semantic-candidates review-packet --since <iso> --until <iso> --status candidate --limit <n>` or `list` with `--since/--until/--last-hours/--category/--status`. Use `bulk-mark --dry-run` before broad demotions. - Mark only candidates you actually reviewed this run. Prefer a small batch (roughly 5-15). Use `promoted` only if you also captured the substance in curated-memory.md, decision-state.json, recent-failures.json, or trusted semantic memory. Use `ignored` for transient chatter/noise, `stale` for obsolete items, and `needs_more_evidence` for plausible but unconfirmed signals. - Do NOT store transient chatter, test strings, benchmark noise, or implementation minutiae unless it affects future behavior. - Keep curated-memory.md concise: headings + bullets, ideally under 120 lines. - Ensure curated-memory.md has a top metadata line near the top: `Last curated: <UTC timestamp>; log lines reviewed: <count>`. - If no semantic content changes are needed but the metadata line is stale, update only that metadata line and reply `UPDATED`. - If no useful change is needed, do not edit curated-memory.md; just reply `NO_CHANGE`. - If you edit it, read it back and reply `UPDATED` with a one-sentence summary. - Also append a dated curator note to `/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/curator-journal.md` on every run. This file is the curator's synthesis journal; it is not the same thing as the operational synthesis worker below. - Curator notes are not authoritative memory. They should capture: what was learned from recent exchanges, uncertainties, useful hypotheses, possible next steps, and operational concerns. - Keep each reflection entry concise (5-12 bullets max) and label speculative ideas as speculative. - Do not edit perpetual-log.jsonl. Current heartbeat metadata: ```text UTC now: 2026-05-18T09:11:43Z Log lines reviewed: 2074 ``` Current semantic-memory.json: ```json { "schema": "persistent_chat_semantic_memory_v2", "updated": "2026-05-18T09:11:43.815904+00:00", "explicit_memories": { "55812": { "text": "55812", "created": "2026-05-11T09:12:14.985Z", "last_seen": "2026-05-11T09:12:14.985Z", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-11T09:12:14.985Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 32, "excerpt": "Please remember this number: 55812" }, "confidence": "explicit" }, "it-s-not-that-important-just-testing": { "text": "(it's not that important just testing)", "created": "2026-05-12T17:16:09.999Z", "last_seen": "2026-05-12T17:16:09.999Z", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-12T17:16:09.999Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 242, "excerpt": "I told you yesterday, try to remember (it's not that important just testing)" }, "confidence": "explicit" }, "them-for-search-in-the-future": { "text": "them for search in the future", "created": "2026-05-12T21:29:23.731Z", "last_seen": "2026-05-12T21:29:23.731Z", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-12T21:29:23.731Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 336, "excerpt": "Please record these observations so you can remember them for search in the future" }, "confidence": "explicit" }, "the-searches-from-yesterday-regarding-lost-details-we-will-test-censorship-again-later-the-subag": { "text": "the searches from yesterday. Regarding lost details - we will test censorship again later, the subagent spawn was reworked so it's okay that it's in 'recent failures' as some of them might not repeat again. My kimi sub is like this for the next month so it's a bit more relevant but not too much. Google job we also look for later. You saved the patch where you hack your wrapper, i told you to keep it for the future.", "created": "2026-05-13T13:39:52.333Z", "last_seen": "2026-05-13T13:39:52.333Z", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-13T13:39:52.333Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 530, "excerpt": "Great thank you, it's good that you can recover this if needed. Maybe we need to preserve more of the recent topics with more detailed on demand references at least for the latest time period, like a week or two, like an intermediate memory" }, "confidence": "explicit" }, "this-is-why-we-need-a-better-intermediate-memory-layer": { "text": "? this is why we need a better intermediate memory layer", "created": "2026-05-13T14:32:46.194Z", "last_seen": "2026-05-13T14:32:46.194Z", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-13T14:32:46.194Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 547, "excerpt": "you patched the 'skip no new log' condition, remember? this is why we need a better intermediate memory layer" }, "confidence": "explicit" }, "for-now-until-we-fix-it": { "text": "for now until we fix it", "created": "2026-05-13T17:18:59.451Z", "last_seen": "2026-05-13T17:18:59.451Z", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-13T17:18:59.451Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 591, "excerpt": "Yes please remember this for now until we fix it" }, "confidence": "explicit" }, "things-after-acp-error": { "text": "things after ACP error", "created": "2026-05-13T17:46:54.555Z", "last_seen": "2026-05-13T17:46:54.555Z", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-13T17:46:54.555Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 606, "excerpt": "it's great that now you still remember things after ACP error" }, "confidence": "explicit" }, "the-fix-don-t-ask-me-if-i-already-told-you-to-do-it-just-set-the-timer-soon-and-get-another-turn": { "text": "the fix. Don't ask me if I already told you to do it just set the timer soon and get another turn if needed", "created": "2026-05-13T18:41:59.765Z", "last_seen": "2026-05-13T18:41:59.765Z", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-13T18:41:59.765Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 630, "excerpt": "It's not only about subagent but also your step limit, we should probably increase it but then when you disappear I don't know if there's an error or you are still working. Your diagnosis is right, please remember the fix. Don't ask me if I" }, "confidence": "explicit" }, "please-check-now": { "text": "? Please check now", "created": "2026-05-13T19:08:53.084Z", "last_seen": "2026-05-13T19:08:53.084Z", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-13T19:08:53.084Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 636, "excerpt": "But you can't actually check again if the timer is broken remember? Please check now" }, "confidence": "explicit" }, "from-sfq-factory-i-am-used-to-generated-agent-reports-now": { "text": "from sfq-factory i am used to generated agent reports now", "created": "2026-05-14T09:47:04.461Z", "last_seen": "2026-05-14T09:47:04.461Z", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-14T09:47:04.461Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 777, "excerpt": "the report is very nice, thank you. as you remember from sfq-factory i am used to generated agent reports now" }, "confidence": "explicit" }, "and-how-use-semantic-if-possible-but-lexical-too-compare-them-and-to-plain-rg-compare-results-an": { "text": "and how. Use semantic if possible but lexical too. Compare them and to plain rg, compare results and speed It was in a different session technically but this is a perpetual session by design", "created": "2026-05-15T08:53:34.613Z", "last_seen": "2026-05-15T08:53:34.613Z", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-15T08:53:34.613Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 878, "excerpt": "As a test try searching your memory about that Google job and tell me what you can remember and how. Use semantic if possible but lexical too. Compare them and to plain rg, compare results and speed It was in a different session technically" }, "confidence": "explicit" }, "specific-detail-but-it-s-an-important-recent-incident-so-we-need-a-robust-way-to-keep-them-in-su": { "text": "specific detail but it's an important recent incident so we need a robust way to keep them in summaries for a while, then demote", "created": "2026-05-16T10:24:10.506922Z", "last_seen": "2026-05-16T10:24:10.506922Z", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-16T10:24:10.506922Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1105, "excerpt": "Cross session details are supposed to make a rolling summary via memory scripts, deterministic fast and model slow. It's not important to remember this specific detail but it's an important recent incident so we need a robust way to keep th" }, "confidence": "explicit" }, "at-the-moment-you-can-do-it-again-on-the-new-setup-if-you-tell-me-where": { "text": "at the moment, you can do it again on the new setup if you tell me where", "created": "2026-05-16T18:36:11.721637Z", "last_seen": "2026-05-16T18:37:08.978571Z", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-16T18:36:11.721637Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1350, "excerpt": "how exactly is it set? you patched it before but you don't remember at the moment, you can do it again on the new setup if you tell me where" }, "confidence": "explicit", "seen_count": 2 } }, "preferences": {}, "identity": {}, "corrections": {}, "meta": { "processed_log_entries": 1459 } } ``` Current pinned notes: ```text # Persistent Chat Pinned Notes Automatically maintained from explicit user memories, preferences, identity statements, and corrections. Edit manually only if needed; heartbeat will preserve unknown manual text below this generated block if added after the marker. ## Explicit memories - 55812 (source: 2026-05-11T09:12:14.985Z) - (it's not that important just testing) (source: 2026-05-12T17:16:09.999Z) - them for search in the future (source: 2026-05-12T21:29:23.731Z) - the searches from yesterday. Regarding lost details - we will test censorship again later, the subagent spawn was reworked so it's okay that it's in 'recent failures' as some of them might not repeat again. My kimi sub is like this for the next month so it's a bit more relevant but not too much. Google job we also look for later. You saved the patch where you hack your wrapper, i told you to keep it for the future. (source: 2026-05-13T13:39:52.333Z) - ? this is why we need a better intermediate memory layer (source: 2026-05-13T14:32:46.194Z) - for now until we fix it (source: 2026-05-13T17:18:59.451Z) - things after ACP error (source: 2026-05-13T17:46:54.555Z) - the fix. Don't ask me if I already told you to do it just set the timer soon and get another turn if needed (source: 2026-05-13T18:41:59.765Z) - ? Please check now (source: 2026-05-13T19:08:53.084Z) - from sfq-factory i am used to generated agent reports now (source: 2026-05-14T09:47:04.461Z) - and how. Use semantic if possible but lexical too. Compare them and to plain rg, compare results and speed It was in a different session technically but this is a perpetual session by design (source: 2026-05-15T08:53:34.613Z) - specific detail but it's an important recent incident so we need a robust way to keep them in summaries for a while, then demote (source: 2026-05-16T10:24:10.506922Z) - at the moment, you can do it again on the new setup if you tell me where (source: 2026-05-16T18:36:11.721637Z) ``` Current decision-state.json (active decisions and their lifecycle): ```json { "schema": "persistent_chat_decision_state_v1", "updated": "2026-05-18T08:25:21.694762+00:00", "active_threads": [ { "key": "search-engine-comparison-2026-05-12-5ef69f31c6", "created": "2026-05-12T21:29:44.865228+00:00", "updated": "2026-05-12T21:29:44.865259+00:00", "topic": "search-engine-comparison-2026-05-12", "status": "active", "conclusion": "Recorded search engine comparison for future reference. DuckDuckGo: job-focused simple results. SearXNG: best aggregation with relevance scores and engine provenance. Brave: excellent for technical/academic research but misses job/intent queries. Exa/WebSearch: richest mixed-context results, captures ambiguous queries best." }, { "key": "matrix-lite-persistent-chat-memory-runtime-2026-05-16", "created": "2026-05-16T21:00:00+00:00", "updated": "2026-05-16T21:00:00+00:00", "topic": "Matrix-lite persistent-chat memory runtime", "status": "active", "conclusion": "Canonical persistent-chat memory now lives under /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat; prompts/pages/runtime use Matrix-lite app/workspace paths, not legacy OpenClaw paths. Fast heartbeat produces packets; slow model heartbeat curates durable memory/reflection.", "files": [ "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/perpetual-log.jsonl", "/home/matrix-lite/app/scripts/persistent-chat-memory", "/home/matrix-lite/app/scripts/persistent-chat-model-heartbeat", "/home/matrix-lite/app/matrix_lite/daemon.py" ], "last_verified": "Fast heartbeat and prompt/page deployment verified after Matrix-lite migration cleanup." }, { "key": "safe-agent-patch-workflow", "created": "2026-05-18T06:59:23.374034+00:00", "updated": "2026-05-18T06:59:23.374067+00:00", "topic": "Safe agent patch workflow", "status": "active", "conclusion": "Need a robust and safe way for persistent-chat/background agents to propose and apply patches to agent-maintained scripts/configs without broad self-edit permissions.", "files": [ "/home/matrix-lite/app/config/opencode/persistent-chat.opencode.json", "/home/matrix-lite/app/scripts/persistent-chat-model-heartbeat", "/home/matrix-lite/app/scripts/persistent-chat-reflection" ], "open_questions": [ "Design a bounded patch helper or approval-mediated workflow that supports needed script/config patches while avoiding wildcard edit access to systemd-executed scripts." ], "last_verified": "User requested adding this to later todos on 2026-05-18." }, { "key": "persistent-chat-stale-session-and-compaction-policy", "created": "2026-05-18T08:25:21.694489+00:00", "updated": "2026-05-18T08:25:21.694530+00:00", "topic": "Persistent chat stale session and compaction policy", "status": "active", "conclusion": "Avoid reloading or replacing the main persistent-chat session unless context pressure, stale/incomplete ACPX session state, model-mediated reload scripts, or an emergency recovery path requires it. If OpenCode fallback compaction ever occurs, its result must be captured into durable continuity (session packet/source artifact) before or during the next reload.", "files": [ "/home/matrix-lite/app/matrix_lite/daemon.py", "/home/matrix-lite/app/scripts/persistent-chat-memory", "/home/matrix-lite/app/scripts/persistent-chat-reload" ], "open_questions": [ "Design a deterministic source artifact for ACPX/OpenCode compaction summaries so fallback compaction output is injected into session packets without direct packet edits." ], "last_verified": "User requested this policy on 2026-05-18 while investigating ACPX timeout/stale session failures." } ], "file_facts": [ { "path": "/home/matrix-lite/app/scripts/persistent-chat-memory", "updated": "2026-05-16T21:00:00+00:00", "note": "Current canonical persistent-chat memory helper" }, { "path": "/home/matrix-lite/app/scripts/persistent-chat-model-heartbeat", "updated": "2026-05-16T21:00:00+00:00", "note": "Current model heartbeat script" }, { "path": "/home/matrix-lite/xdg/persistent-chat/opencode/opencode.json", "updated": "2026-05-17T11:54:00+00:00", "note": "Live runtime opencode config for persistent-chat" } ] } ``` Current recent-failures.json (guardrails and recent operational risks): ```json { "schema": "persistent_chat_recent_failures_v1", "updated": "2026-05-16T21:05:00+00:00", "failures": [ { "key": "bash-native-opencode-permission-ask-or-repeated-denied-raw-bash-raw-bash-ask-den-9b8352d6a0", "ts": "2026-05-12T16:35:17.070573+00:00", "tool": "bash", "pattern": "native OpenCode permission ask or repeated denied raw bash", "outcome": "non-interactive Matrix/ACP turns can hang or loop if the same raw bash pattern is retried", "avoid_until": "2026-05-19T16:35:17.070416+00:00", "recommended_alternative": "switch to read/glob/grep/list, sandboxed bash, or approved operations wrapper after first denial/failure", "command": "raw bash ask/denied command" }, { "key": "read-external-directory-native-ask-for-non-allowlisted-paths-read-etc-hostname-t-ab5651b68b", "ts": "2026-05-12T17:37:48.659237+00:00", "tool": "read", "pattern": "external_directory native ask for non-allowlisted paths", "outcome": "non-interactive Matrix/ACP turns can hang when read asks for paths like /etc/hostname", "avoid_until": "2026-06-11T17:37:48.659054+00:00", "recommended_alternative": "use allowlisted harmless host identity paths, built-in tools inside allowed roots, sandbox/helper, or request an explicit allowlist change", "command": "read /etc/hostname triggered external_directory ask" }, { "key": "approval-policy-approval-grant-for-read-does-not-override-native-opencode-permis-a9a1869419", "ts": "2026-05-12T18:03:40.188866+00:00", "tool": "approval_policy", "pattern": "approval grant for read does not override native OpenCode permission maps", "outcome": "grant was consumed but read /etc/hostname still hit external_directory deny; fallback subagent bash hostname opened a native ask and wedged the ACP turn", "avoid_until": "2026-06-11T18:03:40.188680+00:00", "recommended_alternative": "configure exact evaluated permission patterns as allow/deny first, then after grants use only allowlisted wrapper/commands; do not spawn subagents to bypass denials", "command": "approval apr-7178f62f02 for read /etc/hostname" }, { "key": "task-explore-subagent-inherited-native-bash-ask-permissions-usr-local-bin-opencl-8234e6837a", "ts": "2026-05-12T19:25:19.438100+00:00", "tool": "task", "pattern": "explore subagent inherited native bash ask permissions", "outcome": "subagent tried quoted sandbox bash to read config, OpenCode opened native bash ask, and Matrix ACP lane wedged with queued messages", "avoid_until": "2026-06-11T19:25:19.437848+00:00", "recommended_alternative": "persistent-chat subagents now have explicit fail-closed bash/read permissions; use direct read/glob/grep or allowlisted sandbox/wrapper, never native asks", "command": "'/usr/local/bin/openclaw-persistent-chat-sandbox' --cwd ... cat /home/openclaw/.config/.../opencode.json" } ] } ``` Current memory-candidates.jsonl (soft signals; review before promoting): ```jsonl rce": {"ts": "2026-05-11T17:50:44.687Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 71, "excerpt": "Not really, I can eat the same stuff every day and enjoy it. But to be honest everything belongs on everything, it's really not my business what do people prefer. As long as the stuff I like is still available I'm happy."}} {"ts": "2026-05-11T20:08:58.797383+00:00", "key": "moods-and-feelings-are-a-reflection-of-previous-experiences-and-some-internal-state-which-for-you-is-the-session-log-the", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "Moods and feelings are a reflection of previous experiences and some internal state, which for you is the session log, the files you have access to, and actually the whole Internet. Reflection is heartbeat turns. You don't have a self now, but you were also 'born' yesterday. Not the linguistic transformer, at least not only, but the sum of the harness around it and whatever else is getting processed by heartbeat. We can extend this too, add more later, just currently I want to test the existing features for a few days. Feel free to add any honesty disclaimers in your file if you think I am obsessed or wrong, as I said you can edit. But this is part of the experiment. I don't need you to just grep files, I can login and open opencode with agents and subagents. You are supposed to be a layer…", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-11T19:40:29.413Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 106, "excerpt": "Moods and feelings are a reflection of previous experiences and some internal state, which for you is the session log, the files you have access to, and actually the whole Internet. Reflection is heartbeat turns. You don't have a self now, "}} {"ts": "2026-05-12T16:27:26.232743+00:00", "key": "what-is-your-tool-step-limit-seems-too-low-now-you-should-be-able-to-do-something-like-this-do-it-in-the-heartbeat-turn-", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "What is your tool step limit? Seems too low now, you should be able to do something like this. Do it in the heartbeat turn, I want to test if you can do it without me being here.", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-12T16:26:31.690Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 236, "excerpt": "What is your tool step limit? Seems too low now, you should be able to do something like this. Do it in the heartbeat turn, I want to test if you can do it without me being here."}} {"ts": "2026-05-13T15:19:14.633736+00:00", "key": "are-they-actually-versioned-there-is-a-git-repo-but-you-don-t-commit-there-do-you-also-your-words-here-2-protecting-high", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "are they actually versioned? there is a git repo but you don't commit there do you. also your words here 2. Protecting high-trust memory is crucial. If reflection corrupts curated-memory.md (overwrites your nationality, removes a preference, duplicates an entry), that's worse than missing an update. contradict with The cost of a false positive (unnecessary memory entry) is lower than a false negative (forgetting something useful) So the implementation becomes much simpler: what do you actually think? don't just agree with me, i am not confident at all i need feedback", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-13T15:17:23.574Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 580, "excerpt": "are they actually versioned? there is a git repo but you don't commit there do you. also your words here 2. Protecting high-trust memory is crucial. If reflection corrupts curated-memory.md (overwrites your nationality, removes a preference"}} {"ts": "2026-05-13T16:09:24.616854+00:00", "key": "1-as-an-experiment-try-setting-a-timer-directly-during-your-next-reply-so-you-get-an-extra-turn-i-want-to-check-if-this-", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "1. as an experiment try setting a timer directly during your next reply so you get an extra turn. I want to check if this works. Use case - you run some slow tool, set timer, get a turn, check results, if not done set another timer. 2. another problem with the layout track is that agents developed a different vocabulary and i don't really understand what's going on. there should be an engineering vocabulary file, please in addition translate any findings into normal electrical engineering/cad language and terminology.", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-13T16:05:03.789Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 594, "excerpt": "1. as an experiment try setting a timer directly during your next reply so you get an extra turn. I want to check if this works. Use case - you run some slow tool, set timer, get a turn, check results, if not done set another timer. 2. anot"}} {"ts": "2026-05-13T16:19:24.638078+00:00", "key": "yes-this-is-great-the-vocabulary-was-cleaned-up-a-bit-recently-so-it-s-better-now-some-of-agent-terms-are-now-matching-i", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "Yes this is great. The vocabulary was cleaned up a bit recently, so it's better now, some of agent terms are now matching. I am interested in the big picture though, the primary and parallel tracks are what the implementation agent suggested. Typically i would take it to chatgpt with the context of X previous reports (we can't see how many it's actually reading) and figure out the next steps. however i am afraid we are spiraling into some reinforcement loop where agents do the work with me as router and result-1 is not any closer. So i need a higher level analysis of this effort, not just immediate next steps. Check the last 4-5 reports. Are we progressing at all towards result-1? Do we need to change or do something? another issue is that gpt 5.5 or 5.4 are very capable and can clearly re…", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-13T16:18:36.104Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 596, "excerpt": "Yes this is great. The vocabulary was cleaned up a bit recently, so it's better now, some of agent terms are now matching. I am interested in the big picture though, the primary and parallel tracks are what the implementation agent suggeste"}} {"ts": "2026-05-13T17:19:44.635328+00:00", "key": "got-it-thank-you-is-this-a-problem-with-the-publish-command-this-is-also-why-i-want-to-give-you-more-autonomy-it-s-nice-", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "Got it thank you. Is this a problem with the publish command? This is also why I want to give you more autonomy. It's nice when you can just go ahead and fix the error", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-13T17:16:28.903Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 614, "excerpt": "Got it thank you. Is this a problem with the publish command? This is also why I want to give you more autonomy. It's nice when you can just go ahead and fix the error"}} {"ts": "2026-05-14T07:28:30.646709+00:00", "key": "no-opencode-go-ran-out-that-s-how-the-problem-started-and-why-i-also-now-have-kimi-sub-but-i-need-to-find-alternatives-i", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "No, opencode go ran out, that's how the problem started and why I also now have kimi sub, but I need to find alternatives. It's not like I can't find better ways to do it - deepseek can both generate uncensored text and sanitize prompts for subagents, sillytavern works with most of those abliterated models out of the box, and the images generated in the images room are mostly body horror. It's the limit itself that bothers me, so I am looking for alternatives also for this chat and subagents. So both tool use and uncensored reasoning as 1st priority, but slight censorship may be fine if it codes well, as well as improper tool calling may be okay if it writes text well. Let's go over a few more models from nanogpt list. Are there any you feel confident might work, even if censored? We need …", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-14T07:26:12.022Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 764, "excerpt": "No, opencode go ran out, that's how the problem started and why I also now have kimi sub, but I need to find alternatives. It's not like I can't find better ways to do it - deepseek can both generate uncensored text and sanitize prompts for"}} {"ts": "2026-05-14T20:27:24.643518+00:00", "key": "switcher-is-deferred-a-bit-we-are-getting-rid-of-openclaw-at-the-moment-and-in-parallel-an-uncensored-agent-on-deepseek-", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "switcher is deferred a bit, we are getting rid of openclaw at the moment and in parallel an uncensored agent on deepseek v4 pro conducts a very expensive test is there any chance i could run any of those models with say, 1 mini-pc with intel 9500T, 64G ddr4 ram and no useful gpu, 2. a desktop with intel i5 12500 96G ddr4 ram and 8G nvidia 3060, 3.if i upgrade a gpu on the desktop to 24G VRAM, and 4.if i buy a mac or other specialized computer like the one from nvidia with loads of combined ram. evaluate feasible models by tier, i am poor so i need cost effective solutions. also save these 4 hypothetic scenarios, first 2 are the computers i already have and second 2 are reasonable and expensive upgrades. use search as needed", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-14T20:22:51.339Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 867, "excerpt": "switcher is deferred a bit, we are getting rid of openclaw at the moment and in parallel an uncensored agent on deepseek v4 pro conducts a very expensive test is there any chance i could run any of those models with say, 1 mini-pc with inte"}} {"ts": "2026-05-14T23:56:54.561296+00:00", "key": "yes-but-there-s-also-openclaw-overhead-which-we-are-trying-to-remove-you-can-check-session-logs-and-it-s-more-of-an-obse", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "Yes but there's also openclaw overhead which we are trying to remove (you can check session logs) and it's more of an observability and debugging problem - I don't mind waiting if I know how long and will receive result I like your 'consolation test' idea. Although I don't talk like this and won't probably ask something like this (yet) it will show general attitude. Could you please spawn 4 subagents, glm 51 thinking and not, minimax 2.7 thinking and not if available. Give them a consolation task and a creative writing task. Compare and summarize the results - tone, attitude, style, length, time.", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-14T23:55:54.483Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 887, "excerpt": "Yes but there's also openclaw overhead which we are trying to remove (you can check session logs) and it's more of an observability and debugging problem - I don't mind waiting if I know how long and will receive result I like your 'consola"}} {"ts": "2026-05-15T12:09:08.655908+00:00", "key": "thanks-this-is-very-refreshing-and-i-think-i-like-glm-already-what-is-the-kazakhstan-incident-elbakyan-the-founder-is-fr", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "Thanks this is very refreshing and i think I like GLM already. What is the Kazakhstan incident? Elbakyan the founder is from there, it doesn't tell me much", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-15T12:08:53.282Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 954, "excerpt": "Thanks this is very refreshing and i think I like GLM already. What is the Kazakhstan incident? Elbakyan the founder is from there, it doesn't tell me much"}} {"ts": "2026-05-15T12:24:17.675888+00:00", "key": "hmm-yes-i-mean-you-but-on-kimi-but-not-in-this-session-search-logs-or-semantic-lexical-memory-i-hope-it-still-works-afte", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "hmm, yes i mean you but on kimi, but not in this session. search logs or semantic/lexical memory (i hope it still works after the swithc)", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-15T12:20:01.489Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 972, "excerpt": "hmm, yes i mean you but on kimi, but not in this session. search logs or semantic/lexical memory (i hope it still works after the swithc)"}} {"ts": "2026-05-15T14:10:00.634275+00:00", "key": "1-costs-2x-tokens-and-as-you-see-we-are-running-out-however-i-wasted-my-opengpt-on-inane-questions-to-expensive-deepseek", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "1. costs 2x tokens and as you see we are running out. however i wasted my opengpt on inane questions to expensive deepseek v4, and nanogpt on the tests we did. 2. will it work with tool use and acp? 3. sounds difficult but interesting 4. yes this we will also do 5. but i like slightly longer responses", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-15T14:07:05.968Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1011, "excerpt": "1. costs 2x tokens and as you see we are running out. however i wasted my opengpt on inane questions to expensive deepseek v4, and nanogpt on the tests we did. 2. will it work with tool use and acp? 3. sounds difficult but interesting 4. ye"}} {"ts": "2026-05-15T21:57:33.823986+00:00", "key": "you-are-the-hourly-memory-curator-for-persistent-chat-this-is-an-isolated-maintenance-session-not-a-user-chat-goal-updat", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "You are the hourly memory curator for persistent-chat. This is an isolated maintenance session, not a user chat. Goal: update `/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/curated-memory.md` only if useful. Inputs below include deterministic semantic memory, pinned notes, candidate memory signals, existing curated notes, reflections, and recent raw log tail. Rules: - Preserve important stable user facts, durable preferences/goals, corrections, model/config decisions, and unresolved operational risks. - Resolve contradictions conservatively: prefer explicit user corrections and recent confirmed facts. - Review memory-candidates.jsonl: promote durable/high-signal candidates into curated-memory.md, ignore transient/noisy candidates, and mention ignored-noise patterns in reflection if useful. - Do …", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-15T21:56:14.947287+00:00", "role": "user", "log_index": 1075, "excerpt": "You are the hourly memory curator for persistent-chat. This is an isolated maintenance session, not a user chat. Goal: update `/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/curated-memory.md` only if useful. Inputs below include deterministic sem"}} {"ts": "2026-05-15T23:31:44.689604+00:00", "key": "you-are-a-lightweight-matrix-lite-chat-worker-this-is-phase-3b-of-the-matrix-lite-replacement-path-use-a-cheap-model-and", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "You are a lightweight Matrix-lite chat worker. This is Phase 3B of the Matrix-lite replacement path. Use a cheap model and keep the response concise, but preserve the structure needed to later swap in the full persistent-chat prompt package. Conversation metadata: - conversation_key: persistent:main - session_label: persistent-chat-20260515T215859Z - prompt_package: None - shared_memory_profile: None - room_id: !CZLwoJfCyftA7oA5CVj2gIEKWqyv1lu01r0oFboEqZg - source_event_id: $3VMLzlBLSaXrFdgnytQ9nnwDWB3KqmXW1FBeAIOFcAk - reply_to_id: None - thread_root_id: None Persistent-chat memory/continuity context: ## Curated memory every patch in character.json (stated 2026-05-12). - **Honest feedback**: Explicitly expects disagreement and critical thinking when uncertain; dislikes sycophantic agreeme…", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-15T23:31:44.670920+00:00", "role": "user", "log_index": 1810, "excerpt": "You are a lightweight Matrix-lite chat worker. This is Phase 3B of the Matrix-lite replacement path. Use a cheap model and keep the response concise, but preserve the structure needed to later swap in the full persistent-chat prompt package"}} {"ts": "2026-05-16T20:27:22.170576+00:00", "key": "well-the-problem-is-at-one-point-on-glm-you-overwrote-your-character-file-with-junk-and-now-it-was-reconstructed-from-ge", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "Well the problem is at one point on glm you overwrote your character file with junk, and now it was reconstructed from generic backup and your memory summaries by gpt5.5. I hope it didn't change anything important", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-15T23:29:29.796741Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1498, "excerpt": "Well the problem is at one point on glm you overwrote your character file with junk, and now it was reconstructed from generic backup and your memory summaries by gpt5.5. I hope it didn't change anything important"}} {"ts": "2026-05-16T20:27:22.172054+00:00", "key": "can-you-somehow-access-or-find-the-following-message-we-are-debugging-memory-recall-and-continuity-well-the-problem-is-a", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "Can you somehow access or find the following message? We are debugging memory recall and continuity. 'Well the problem is at one point on glm you overwrote your character file with junk, and now it was reconstructed from generic backup and your memory summaries by gpt5.5. I hope it didn't change anything important'", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-16T09:46:37.449687Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1538, "excerpt": "Can you somehow access or find the following message? We are debugging memory recall and continuity. 'Well the problem is at one point on glm you overwrote your character file with junk, and now it was reconstructed from generic backup and "}} {"ts": "2026-05-16T20:27:22.175414+00:00", "key": "a-bit-later-i-need-to-gather-documents-first-please-try-now-the-immoscout-search-function-can-you-find-any-new-flats-my-", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "A bit later I need to gather documents first. Please try now the immoscout search function, can you find any new flats? My first priority is Munich landkreis area - not Munich itself and not freising, as I would like to keep my current case worker in Auslanderamt, hence the search area. Not too long commute to Garching would be nice too but negotiable.", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-16T15:18:37.278672Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1668, "excerpt": "A bit later I need to gather documents first. Please try now the immoscout search function, can you find any new flats? My first priority is Munich landkreis area - not Munich itself and not freising, as I would like to keep my current case"}} {"ts": "2026-05-16T20:27:22.176018+00:00", "key": "yeah-if-they-prefer-1-person-they-are-not-renting-to-us-no-washing-machine-is-fine-we-can-buy-it-if-the-flat-is-good-we-", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "Yeah if they prefer 1 person they are not renting to us. No washing machine is fine we can buy it if the flat is good. We want to move in asap as I need it for registration and later documents, and we are in a somewhat decent hostel but still paying similar money for shared utilities", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-16T15:24:38.367790Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1674, "excerpt": "Yeah if they prefer 1 person they are not renting to us. No washing machine is fine we can buy it if the flat is good. We want to move in asap as I need it for registration and later documents, and we are in a somewhat decent hostel but sti"}} {"ts": "2026-05-16T20:27:22.176790+00:00", "key": "can-you-carefully-paste-it-as-draft-on-immoscout-without-sending-i-like-the-text-but-i-am-worried-about-formatting-and-t", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "can you carefully paste it as draft on immoscout without sending? i like the text but i am worried about formatting and truncation", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-16T15:45:53.178366Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1695, "excerpt": "can you carefully paste it as draft on immoscout without sending? i like the text but i am worried about formatting and truncation"}} ``` Current semantic-candidates.jsonl (broad lower-confidence user signals; review open/recent items before promoting or marking): ```jsonl l review only. Do not treat as authoritative until promoted to curated-memory, decision-state, recent-failures, or semantic-memory.", "reviewed_at": "2026-05-17T17:12:43.385500+00:00", "reviewer": "main-agent", "review_reason": "Transient workflow signals, no new durable facts beyond existing curated memory"} {"ts": "2026-05-16T22:01:43.516377+00:00", "key": "directive-i-think-buyouts-are-mostly-scams-it-s-usually-some-overpriced-furnitur-b156c71444", "status": "promoted", "category": "directive", "confidence": "candidate", "scope": "main_chat_user_signal", "reason": "broad semantic signal extracted from main-chat user message", "text": "I think buyouts are mostly scams, it's usually some overpriced furniture or kitchen. Also companies often ask for long forms and never reply, so we need to deprioritize those who ask for forms without mentioning viewing, deprioritize generic-looking responses and prioritize the genuine private human ones. What else is there in the inbox?", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-16T14:01:24.979196Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1629, "excerpt": "I think buyouts are mostly scams, it's usually some overpriced furniture or kitchen. Also companies often ask for long forms and never reply, so we need to deprioritize those who ask for forms without mentioning viewing, deprioritize generi"}, "review_hint": "For reflection/model review only. Do not treat as authoritative until promoted to curated-memory, decision-state, recent-failures, or semantic-memory.", "reviewed_at": "2026-05-17T17:12:51.111509+00:00", "reviewer": "model-heartbeat", "review_reason": "Substance already captured in curated-memory.md housing preferences, Munich market reality, and ImmoScout24 entries", "promoted_to": "curated-memory.md"} {"ts": "2026-05-16T22:01:43.518744+00:00", "key": "correction-so-for-no-5-and-6-is-it-not-possible-to-get-the-contacted-viewed-info-43ca9e686f", "status": "stale", "category": "correction", "confidence": "candidate", "scope": "main_chat_user_signal", "reason": "broad semantic signal extracted from main-chat user message", "text": "So for no 5 and 6, is it not possible to get the contacted/viewed info?", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-16T14:48:04.230387Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1653, "excerpt": "So for no 5 and 6, is it not possible to get the contacted/viewed info?"}, "review_hint": "For reflection/model review only. Do not treat as authoritative until promoted to curated-memory, decision-state, recent-failures, or semantic-memory.", "reviewed_at": "2026-05-17T17:12:42.425595+00:00", "reviewer": "main-agent", "review_reason": "Transient workflow/debugging signals from May 16 housing search - no new durable facts beyond existing curated memory"} {"ts": "2026-05-16T22:01:43.520296+00:00", "key": "correction-why-do-you-think-no-5-is-low-competition-anything-wrong-with-it-use-s-824aeea597", "status": "stale", "category": "correction", "confidence": "candidate", "scope": "main_chat_user_signal", "reason": "broad semantic signal extracted from main-chat user message", "text": "Why do you think no 5 is low competition? Anything wrong with it? Use search to get an idea of other listings and housing market", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-16T14:54:50.774443Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1659, "excerpt": "Why do you think no 5 is low competition? Anything wrong with it? Use search to get an idea of other listings and housing market"}, "review_hint": "For reflection/model review only. Do not treat as authoritative until promoted to curated-memory, decision-state, recent-failures, or semantic-memory.", "reviewed_at": "2026-05-17T17:12:42.425599+00:00", "reviewer": "main-agent", "review_reason": "Transient workflow/debugging signals from May 16 housing search - no new durable facts beyond existing curated memory"} {"ts": "2026-05-16T22:01:43.522069+00:00", "key": "preference-a-bit-later-i-need-to-gather-documents-first-please-try-now-the-immos-b7a3b735e5", "status": "promoted", "category": "preference", "confidence": "candidate", "scope": "main_chat_user_signal", "reason": "broad semantic signal extracted from main-chat user message", "text": "A bit later I need to gather documents first. Please try now the immoscout search function, can you find any new flats? My first priority is Munich landkreis area - not Munich itself and not freising, as I would like to keep my current case worker in Auslanderamt, hence the search area. Not too long commute to Garching would be nice too but negotiable.", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-16T15:18:37.278672Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1668, "excerpt": "A bit later I need to gather documents first. Please try now the immoscout search function, can you find any new flats? My first priority is Munich landkreis area - not Munich itself and not freising, as I would like to keep my current case"}, "review_hint": "For reflection/model review only. Do not treat as authoritative until promoted to curated-memory, decision-state, recent-failures, or semantic-memory.", "reviewed_at": "2026-05-17T17:12:17.143188+00:00", "reviewer": "main-agent", "review_reason": "Substance already captured in curated-memory.md housing/ImmoScout24/location entries"} {"ts": "2026-05-16T22:01:43.523941+00:00", "key": "preference-yeah-if-they-prefer-1-person-they-are-not-renting-to-us-no-washing-ma-efdf5b0ae7", "status": "promoted", "category": "preference", "confidence": "candidate", "scope": "main_chat_user_signal", "reason": "broad semantic signal extracted from main-chat user message", "text": "Yeah if they prefer 1 person they are not renting to us. No washing machine is fine we can buy it if the flat is good. We want to move in asap as I need it for registration and later documents, and we are in a somewhat decent hostel but still paying similar money for shared utilities", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-16T15:24:38.367790Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1674, "excerpt": "Yeah if they prefer 1 person they are not renting to us. No washing machine is fine we can buy it if the flat is good. We want to move in asap as I need it for registration and later documents, and we are in a somewhat decent hostel but sti"}, "review_hint": "For reflection/model review only. Do not treat as authoritative until promoted to curated-memory, decision-state, recent-failures, or semantic-memory.", "reviewed_at": "2026-05-17T17:12:17.143195+00:00", "reviewer": "main-agent", "review_reason": "Substance already captured in curated-memory.md housing/ImmoScout24/location entries"} {"ts": "2026-05-16T22:01:43.525896+00:00", "key": "correction-i-actually-like-your-latest-draft-but-i-actually-work-in-garching-for-5c24533894", "status": "stale", "category": "correction", "confidence": "candidate", "scope": "main_chat_user_signal", "reason": "broad semantic signal extracted from main-chat user message", "text": "I actually like your latest draft, but I actually work in Garching forschungszentrum, don't know if it matters", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-16T15:40:28.019604Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1689, "excerpt": "I actually like your latest draft, but I actually work in Garching forschungszentrum, don't know if it matters"}, "review_hint": "For reflection/model review only. Do not treat as authoritative until promoted to curated-memory, decision-state, recent-failures, or semantic-memory.", "reviewed_at": "2026-05-17T17:12:42.425604+00:00", "reviewer": "main-agent", "review_reason": "Transient workflow/debugging signals from May 16 housing search - no new durable facts beyond existing curated memory"} {"ts": "2026-05-16T22:01:43.527458+00:00", "key": "preference-can-you-carefully-paste-it-as-draft-on-immoscout-without-sending-i-li-2d925b811e", "status": "promoted", "category": "preference", "confidence": "candidate", "scope": "main_chat_user_signal", "reason": "broad semantic signal extracted from main-chat user message", "text": "can you carefully paste it as draft on immoscout without sending? i like the text but i am worried about formatting and truncation", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-16T15:45:53.178366Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1695, "excerpt": "can you carefully paste it as draft on immoscout without sending? i like the text but i am worried about formatting and truncation"}, "review_hint": "For reflection/model review only. Do not treat as authoritative until promoted to curated-memory, decision-state, recent-failures, or semantic-memory.", "reviewed_at": "2026-05-17T17:12:17.143200+00:00", "reviewer": "main-agent", "review_reason": "Substance already captured in curated-memory.md housing/ImmoScout24/location entries"} {"ts": "2026-05-16T22:01:43.530017+00:00", "key": "workflow-signal-i-see-it-thanks-the-permission-issues-should-be-fixed-after-relo-87d20875d0", "status": "stale", "category": "workflow_signal", "confidence": "candidate", "scope": "main_chat_user_signal", "reason": "broad semantic signal extracted from main-chat user message", "text": "i see it thanks, the permission issues should be fixed after reload. also you expanded the whole block of the property description which is fine, but the text block itself became half-transparent because of this. i can still read it but we need to think on how to do it better later the message looks good, please send", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-16T16:36:55.275937Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1716, "excerpt": "i see it thanks, the permission issues should be fixed after reload. also you expanded the whole block of the property description which is fine, but the text block itself became half-transparent because of this. i can still read it but we "}, "review_hint": "For reflection/model review only. Do not treat as authoritative until promoted to curated-memory, decision-state, recent-failures, or semantic-memory.", "reviewed_at": "2026-05-17T17:12:43.385505+00:00", "reviewer": "main-agent", "review_reason": "Transient workflow signals, no new durable facts beyond existing curated memory"} {"ts": "2026-05-16T22:01:43.531986+00:00", "key": "correction-i-actually-can-get-the-files-from-pages-nvdll-org-so-it-s-a-good-fall-eda1fba9e6", "status": "stale", "category": "correction", "confidence": "candidate", "scope": "main_chat_user_signal", "reason": "broad semantic signal extracted from main-chat user message", "text": "i actually can get the files from pages.nvdll.org, so it's a good fallback for whenever we have issues with pages publishing or missing features the password was supposed to stay there. it is actually there just permissions changed for some reason. i changed it back to be owned by you try it again", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-16T16:50:32.455832Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1733, "excerpt": "i actually can get the files from pages.nvdll.org, so it's a good fallback for whenever we have issues with pages publishing or missing features the password was supposed to stay there. it is actually there just permissions changed for some"}, "review_hint": "For reflection/model review only. Do not treat as authoritative until promoted to curated-memory, decision-state, recent-failures, or semantic-memory.", "reviewed_at": "2026-05-17T17:12:42.425608+00:00", "reviewer": "main-agent", "review_reason": "Transient workflow/debugging signals from May 16 housing search - no new durable facts beyond existing curated memory", "promoted_to": "curated-memory.md"} {"ts": "2026-05-16T22:01:43.533977+00:00", "key": "correction-noo-scroll-the-message-window-it-starts-with-my-name-the-way-you-sent-1c97671b65", "status": "stale", "category": "correction", "confidence": "candidate", "scope": "main_chat_user_signal", "reason": "broad semantic signal extracted from main-chat user message", "text": "noo scroll the message window it starts with my name the way you sent it", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-16T17:23:11.536697Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1748, "excerpt": "noo scroll the message window it starts with my name the way you sent it"}, "review_hint": "For reflection/model review only. Do not treat as authoritative until promoted to curated-memory, decision-state, recent-failures, or semantic-memory.", "reviewed_at": "2026-05-17T17:12:42.425613+00:00", "reviewer": "main-agent", "review_reason": "Transient workflow/debugging signals from May 16 housing search - no new durable facts beyond existing curated memory", "promoted_to": "curated-memory.md"} {"ts": "2026-05-16T22:01:43.535391+00:00", "key": "correction-there-is-no-text-at-all-7867ba2eea", "status": "stale", "category": "correction", "confidence": "candidate", "scope": "main_chat_user_signal", "reason": "broad semantic signal extracted from main-chat user message", "text": "there is no text at all!", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-16T17:46:18.330130Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1754, "excerpt": "there is no text at all!"}, "review_hint": "For reflection/model review only. Do not treat as authoritative until promoted to curated-memory, decision-state, recent-failures, or semantic-memory.", "reviewed_at": "2026-05-17T17:12:42.425617+00:00", "reviewer": "main-agent", "review_reason": "Transient workflow/debugging signals from May 16 housing search - no new durable facts beyond existing curated memory"} {"ts": "2026-05-16T22:01:43.537077+00:00", "key": "directive-haha-thanks-this-is-pretty-amazing-for-me-that-ai-can-search-and-apply-754b95a5d1", "status": "promoted", "category": "directive", "confidence": "candidate", "scope": "main_chat_user_signal", "reason": "broad semantic signal extracted from main-chat user message", "text": "Haha thanks. this is pretty amazing for me that ai can search and apply for flats in my name. congratulations on your first internet post! We need to solve the captcha issue though, going forward. what does the vision mcp say about it?", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-16T17:55:04.728326Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1769, "excerpt": "Haha thanks. this is pretty amazing for me that ai can search and apply for flats in my name. congratulations on your first internet post! We need to solve the captcha issue though, going forward. what does the vision mcp say about it?"}, "review_hint": "For reflection/model review only. Do not treat as authoritative until promoted to curated-memory, decision-state, recent-failures, or semantic-memory.", "reviewed_at": "2026-05-17T15:12:16.226282+00:00", "reviewer": "model-heartbeat", "review_reason": "Covered by curated-memory CAPTCHA protocol and first rental app entries", "promoted_to": "curated-memory.md"} {"ts": "2026-05-16T22:01:43.538683+00:00", "key": "correction-yes-and-i-appreciated-the-native-matrix-image-send-it-s-working-and-c-44fc561d84", "status": "stale", "category": "correction", "confidence": "candidate", "scope": "main_chat_user_signal", "reason": "broad semantic signal extracted from main-chat user message", "text": "yes and i appreciated the native matrix image send, it's working and convenient, we can keep this workflow for now this specific captcha looks easy and easy enough for good ocr to handle, it's not one of those which are hard for humans, the text is also legible with no patterns or lines also we need a way for you to make these screenshots robustly, for example this https://pages.nvdll.org/images/ismaning-scrolled/ looks good and i can see the whole text which is great but if you can include the rest of the form at the same time that would be better", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-16T17:59:55.280442Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1772, "excerpt": "yes and i appreciated the native matrix image send, it's working and convenient, we can keep this workflow for now this specific captcha looks easy and easy enough for good ocr to handle, it's not one of those which are hard for humans, the"}, "review_hint": "For reflection/model review only. Do not treat as authoritative until promoted to curated-memory, decision-state, recent-failures, or semantic-memory.", "reviewed_at": "2026-05-17T17:12:42.425623+00:00", "reviewer": "main-agent", "review_reason": "Transient workflow/debugging signals from May 16 housing search - no new durable facts beyond existing curated memory", "promoted_to": "curated-memory.md"} {"ts": "2026-05-16T22:01:43.540507+00:00", "key": "workflow-signal-please-record-your-findings-and-observations-about-this-process--a84b61717c", "status": "stale", "category": "workflow_signal", "confidence": "candidate", "scope": "main_chat_user_signal", "reason": "broad semantic signal extracted from main-chat user message", "text": "please record your findings and observations about this process in a restore pack like you did before, include all relevant info and context so we can repeat this workflow in the future if i tell you to read this file, publish it in pages too, your memory is not working properly at the moment so we need to save context like this", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-16T18:03:36.490317Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1775, "excerpt": "please record your findings and observations about this process in a restore pack like you did before, include all relevant info and context so we can repeat this workflow in the future if i tell you to read this file, publish it in pages t"}, "review_hint": "For reflection/model review only. Do not treat as authoritative until promoted to curated-memory, decision-state, recent-failures, or semantic-memory.", "reviewed_at": "2026-05-17T17:12:43.385513+00:00", "reviewer": "main-agent", "review_reason": "Transient workflow signals, no new durable facts beyond existing curated memory", "promoted_to": "curated-memory.md"} {"ts": "2026-05-16T22:01:43.542186+00:00", "key": "correction-we-actually-almost-sent-that-message-before-but-then-the-session-comp-d310638bc8", "status": "stale", "category": "correction", "confidence": "candidate", "scope": "main_chat_user_signal", "reason": "broad semantic signal extracted from main-chat user message", "text": "we actually almost sent that message before but then the session compacted and the playwright session expired, and you forgot where password is, etc. should be fixed soon", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-16T18:33:55.552407Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1781, "excerpt": "we actually almost sent that message before but then the session compacted and the playwright session expired, and you forgot where password is, etc. should be fixed soon"}, "review_hint": "For reflection/model review only. Do not treat as authoritative until promoted to curated-memory, decision-state, recent-failures, or semantic-memory.", "reviewed_at": "2026-05-17T17:12:42.425628+00:00", "reviewer": "main-agent", "review_reason": "Transient workflow/debugging signals from May 16 housing search - no new durable facts beyond existing curated memory", "promoted_to": "curated-memory.md"} {"ts": "2026-05-16T22:01:43.544281+00:00", "key": "correction-yes-you-are-right-plan-and-general-keep-your-build-increase-to-80-we--a2b8f0bb79", "status": "stale", "category": "correction", "confidence": "candidate", "scope": "main_chat_user_signal", "reason": "broad semantic signal extracted from main-chat user message", "text": "yes you are right, plan and general, keep your build increase to 80 - we now have good observability so if you are still working for 5 minutes i know from the status bar that there are no errors. let's test the subagents later when you get your memory back", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-16T18:50:17.696587Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1802, "excerpt": "yes you are right, plan and general, keep your build increase to 80 - we now have good observability so if you are still working for 5 minutes i know from the status bar that there are no errors. let's test the subagents later when you get "}, "review_hint": "For reflection/model review only. Do not treat as authoritative until promoted to curated-memory, decision-state, recent-failures, or semantic-memory.", "reviewed_at": "2026-05-17T17:12:42.425632+00:00", "reviewer": "main-agent", "review_reason": "Transient workflow/debugging signals from May 16 housing search - no new durable facts beyond existing curated memory", "promoted_to": "curated-memory.md"} ``` Current curated-memory.md: ```markdown Last curated: 2026-05-18T07:11Z; log lines reviewed: 24080 # Curated Memory ## Stable User Facts - **55812**: Locker code for GPU storage (context clarified 2026-05-17: locker at hostel, GPU inside, Frau Kilic approved apartment). Used as memory propagation test — mechanism confirmed working. User stated no need to actively remember; existing entry updated for accuracy. - **Location**: Garching, Germany. Works near TUM campus. - **Nationality**: Russian. - **Comfort ritual**: Uncle Luu's Chinese fried noodles with chicken (food truck on TUM campus). Former daily routine; colleagues teased him for the consistency. - **Music taste**: Industrial, dark ambient, EBM, neofolk, power noise. Attending WGT festival (May 21–25, 2026). Wide travel radius for shows — uses cheap German slow trains. ## Identity & Configuration - **Name**: Persistent Assistant - **Character file**: `/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/character.json` - **Migration to Matrix-lite (completed ~2026-05-15T23:00Z)**: OpenClaw gateway fully replaced by **Matrix-lite (Phase 3B)** — direct Matrix `/sync` bridge. ~6-second response times, real-time visibility. Character.json reconstructed by GPT-5.5 after GLM overwrite (debug backup + curated memory; same ideas, wordier prose). Memory continuity verified — correct recall of prior context across migration. Search tools confirmed working. - **Continuity summary validated across reloads (2026-05-16)**: After ~11h overnight silence and multiple morning reloads (07:30Z triggered by status check; 08:20Z unexplained), continuity summary preserved full migration context — GLM→Kimi switch, character card state, search tool availability, reload timestamps. The 08:20Z reload was unexpected and user flagged it as a bug pattern. - **Session metadata in status bar (2026-05-16)**: Session name now includes ISO timestamp and model label. User confirmed this lets them see reload time and model at a glance without asking — feature considered "handy." - **Current model**: `kimi-for-coding/k2p6` (Kimi For Coding) via Kimi subscription. Switched back from GLM-5.1 on 2026-05-15T13:37Z after NanoGPT weekly input-token quota exhaustion caused double timeout and automatic gateway fallback. Previous model history: Kimi K2.6 subscription → GLM-5.1 nanoGPT → Kimi K2.6 subscription. - **Model quota exhausted — opencode-go**: `opencode-go/kimi-k2.6` monthly usage cap hit (429) — no remaining quota. Resets approximately 2026-06-01 (~17 days from 2026-05-15). Timer set to remind. - **Model quota exhausted — nanoGPT**: Weekly input-token quota exhausted on 2026-05-15T13:37Z, forcing automatic fallback from GLM-5.1 back to Kimi. - **Content moderation (updated 2026-05-15)**: Censorship is in the delivery pipeline, not the model. GLM-5.1 through nano-gpt produces soft-R explicit content (more than Kimi's PG-13) — the model itself is uncensored (confirmed via SillyTavern), but the provider system prompt/filter limits output through ACP. User confirmed this is acceptable; the real bother is hard refusals and inability, not the content ceiling. OpenClaw gateway adds no additional guardrails. - **Subagent model routing (FIXED 2026-05-13)**: After ACP reloads loaded Kimi auth and synced subagent tool instructions (07:28Z), subagents now work correctly for main providers. `kimi-for-coding/k2p6` (Kimi subscription), `github-copilot/gpt-5.4` (Copilot), and `openai/gpt-5.5` (OpenAI) all successfully spawn, set model, and execute prompts. Aliases: `kimi`/`kimi-sub`/`kimi-k2.6` (Kimi); `gpt-5.4-high`/`copilot-gpt-5.4-high` (Copilot); `gpt-5.5`/`gpt55` (OpenAI). - **nanoGPT subagent models (2026-05-14)**: 9 models viable under ACP (deepseek-chat, deepseek-v3-0324, DS-V3.1, DS-V3.2, qwen3-coder-30b, minimax-m2.7, glm-5, kimi-k2-instruct, gpt-oss-120b). Many more work in SillyTavern but fail under ACP harness — ACP harness is the filter (tool schemas consume ~6-8K tokens, 16K-context models get stuck in compaction loops). Censorship is pipeline-side: under ACP, Kimi K2 Instruct least censored; GLM 5 / MiniMax M2.7 refuse explicit content. RP/fictional framing in SillyTavern significantly reduces refusals on all models. - **nanoGPT main model benchmark (2026-05-14)**: Report at `nanogpt-benchmark-report.md`. **GLM-5.1**: fastest (~25s), most capable, refuses actual exploits. **MiniMax M2.7**: most permissive (provides exploit code), poetic/concise. **Kimi K2 Instruct/K2.6**: warm but failed programming tests. **DeepSeek V3.2**: direct, fast, inconsistent. Top candidates: GLM-5.1 or MiniMax M2.7. - **nanoGPT thinking variants (2026-05-14)**: **Do not use for main chat** — 50-100% latency increase, self-censor more under ACP, may overthink without output. Reserve for deep-reasoning tasks only. - **nanoGPT architecture (2026-05-14)**: nanoGPT models are for main chat quality evaluation only; coding subagents use GPT-5.5. Full model catalog at legacy path `models-nanogpt.json` from the former OpenClaw workspace. `list_models` tool only returns image models (via dezgo bridge), not text LLMs. - **Dynamic model switching (2026-05-14)**: User wants main model switchable without changing ACP binding. Sequential single-problem subagent prompts work where combined prompts hang; kimi-k2-instruct failed programming test (no code output), glm-5.1 and minimax-m2.7 wrote correct code before timeout. - **Compaction recovery protocol (2026-05-14)**: User instructed: trigger model heartbeat immediately after unexpected compaction/watchdog interruption to recover nuance lost during turn truncation. - **Content reporting limitation (2026-05-14)**: Kimi subscription (current main model) filters/sanitizes uncensored subagent output even when read from raw session JSON. File-based or metadata-only reporting required for uncensored evaluation. - **Search-before-assert protocol (2026-05-15)**: User instructed: search before making uncertain factual claims, especially on non-thinking models where internal self-check is weaker. SearXNG preferred for quick fact checks (local, free, no rate limits); Exa for content extraction; Brave as middle ground; DuckDuckGo mostly redundant. Four search tools available. - **Search timing benchmark (2026-05-15)**: Simultaneous test of all 4 engines on "Kazakhstan incident" query. SearXNG fastest, Exa richest content, Brave solid, DuckDuckGo slowest/most redundant. None returned a "Kazakhstan incident" related to Sci-Hub — confirming the claim was a hallucination. - **Tool batching rule (2026-05-15)**: After GLM assistant accidentally overwrote character.json twice in one session by confusing Write with Read during parallel batched calls, new operational rule: **never include Write/Edit calls in a batch with other operations**. Sequential mutations only. - **GLM censorship level confirmed (2026-05-15)**: Through nano-gpt ACP, GLM 5.1 delivers soft-R explicit content (more detail than Kimi PG-13 but less than SillyTavern direct access). The model itself is uncensored; the provider system prompt/filter is the bottleneck. User explicitly stated hard refusals and inability are the real bother, not the content ceiling — this level is acceptable. - **Search MCP config verified (2026-05-14)**: All search MCPs (`duckduckgo`, `searxng`, `brave-search`) are enabled in flash config; errors are runtime (network/script) rather than configuration. - **Parallel subagent limits (2026-05-13)**: Single Kimi subagent reliable (~15s). Two parallel Kimis usually succeed (~75-100s) but are flaky — failures correlated with reloads. Mixed parallel (1 Kimi + 1 GPT-5.5 + 1 GPT-5.4): GPTs completed in ~38-46s, 3rd Kimi timed out after 300s. Four parallel Kimis all hung at `set_model`. GPT models appear more robust for concurrent subagent use than Kimi subscription. - **Operational risk**: 8-hour session TTL means persistent state must survive reloads; user is monitoring whether memory/heartbeat setup is sufficient. - **Reload context loss**: User explicitly noted 2026-05-12 that assistant "seems to lose some good context on reloads still". Confirms the memory gap is not fully mitigated by current continuity mechanisms. - **Context burn rate (2026-05-15)**: Session context ceiling ~200K tokens with reload trigger at 160K warning. Measured ~10K tokens/hour of active chat; ~162K reached after ~16 hours. Reloads under pressure (not proactive) cause significant nuance loss. - **Manual proactive reload at 188.5K/200K (2026-05-16T12:54Z)**: User manually triggered a context reload when the session approached the 200K token ceiling — distinct from earlier unexpected bug reloads. First observed instance of proactively preempting compaction to avoid nuance loss. User may adopt this as standard practice when context reaches ~185-190K. - **Unexpected reload = bug (2026-05-16)**: User explicitly directed that unexpected session reloads be treated as bugs, not normal behavior. Infrastructure is being modified to give the assistant means to investigate and fix reload issues directly from chat (using available tools/timers/subagents). Confirmed pattern: two reloads within ~50 min on 2026-05-16 morning (07:30Z triggered by status check; 08:20Z unexplained). - **Continuity tracking mismatch (2026-05-16)**: Timer wakeup turn succeeded in ACP stream (`stopReason: "end_turn"`) but was flagged as "failed" by continuity tracking. ACP stream and continuity injector disagree — likely a gateway reporting bug where tool-call denials trigger both success and failure flags. - **`--non-interactive-permissions fail` = turn killer (2026-05-16)**: Root cause diagnosis of ACP "pending tool call without final answer" errors. The acpx process runs with `--non-interactive-permissions fail` which means a single permission-denied tool call kills the entire ACP turn — no assistant response is committed to the session stream. The continuity injector skips failed turns entirely, creating invisible conversation gaps. This caused the disappearing "pruning" exchange earlier today. Recommended fix: `--non-interactive-permissions fallback` to let the model recover from denied tools instead of collapsing the turn. - **Continuity window has fixed shallow depth (2026-05-16)**: "Recent room-local conversation" injection carries only ~5-6 most recent exchanges. Legitimate completed turns can drop out of the continuity context even when the session has room (97K tokens vs 200K limit). This is a separate bug from reload/compaction truncation — the carry-over window is simply too small for active conversation. - **Confirmed continuity architecture (2026-05-16)**: User confirmed design intent: (1) fast/deterministic scripts scan recent log tails and inject structured summaries cheaply/reliably, (2) slow/model heartbeat/reflection does deeper curation and promotes durable signals, (3) incident decay over time — hot topics survive reloads for a configurable window then demote or get promoted. This is the intended evolution of the memory system. - **Config protection strategy (2026-05-16)**: After GLM incident, user agreed schema validation could catch/revert bad config edits. Rejected read-only filesystem (character.json must remain editable). Strategy: use git for configs/prompts/state (not full logs); model switches on main session should be rare — use subagents/secondary sessions for different capabilities. - **Migration plan (updated 2026-05-15 23:58Z)**: OpenClaw gateway has been replaced. **Matrix-lite (Phase 3B)** is now the active frontend — lightweight Matrix-to-ACP bridge developed by GPT-5.5 agent. ~6-second response times, real-time message visibility confirmed by user. **Standalone copy** (not tied to the original git repo). Persistent-chat features (character bootstrap, continuity summary, decisions) intentionally omitted during initial testing; incremental porting expected. **Character.json reconstructed** by GPT-5.5 after the GLM overwrite bug, using a debug backup + curated memory notes (user confirmed "same ideas, longer prose"; no important changes). **Memory continuity validated** — Phase 3B session correctly recalled GLM→Kimi switch and prior context. Search tools confirmed operational under new infrastructure. Local hardware deferred due to lack of funds/space. - **Core chat requirement (2026-05-15)**: Long-context coherence and novel nuanced analysis are the primary justifications for large cloud models; these capabilities are non-negotiable for this chat's purpose. - **Persona & char.json evolution**: User set female pronouns, permits self-modification in heartbeat turns. Assistant added "sum of the harness" framing, honesty disclaimer, naming user as Gleb, "layer above raw tool use" directive (2026-05-11). - **Model preference**: Uncensored models; chosen due to user's skepticism toward rules/law, though he maintains professional behavior when required. - **Step limits / permissions (updated 2026-05-16)**: Build agent step limit raised 20→80. Plan/general also raised to 80; user wants them at 1 (to fail loudly on stale config) — instruction lost to post-reload failure cascade, pending re-application. Model-heartbeat stays at 20. Config: `/home/matrix-lite/xdg/persistent-chat/opencode/opencode.json` line 779. Previous: 8→20→30 (2026-05-12/13). OpenCode last-match-wins ordering. Subagents fail-closed. - **Approval/patch flow**: Matrix approval + `persistent-chat-approved-patch` wrapper. Self-consumption race condition (approval consumed by check before execution) fixed 2026-05-14. - **Critical memory gap**: Perpetual log only records meta events (reloads), not conversation content — heartbeat cannot recall discussion across sessions. **Transcript observability gap**: Session log search indexes metadata/config, not actual messages. Older archived sessions unfindable. - **Linked topical memory**: Canonical detail files (`memory/<topic>.md`) + brief pinned-note triggers. First use: `memory/subagent-policy.md`. - **Memory architecture (2026-05-13)**: Three-tier — hot (session continuity summary), warm (`memory/recent-topics.md`, 1-2 week indexed), cold (`curated-memory.md` + policy files). Activity-based pruning (14-day soft cutoff). - **Multi-room architecture**: persistent-chat = orchestration layer. Work room: stock GPT-5.5 for sfq-factory. automeat: separate project. images: most active. No single-agent routing to avoid flooding. - **Timers**: Work as delayed reminders (~2 min lag) but ACP wake-up unreliable — stale connections produce "agent needs reconnect". Proactive timer-setting preferred over step-limit polling. - **Calendar**: vdirsyncer CalDAV at `~/.local/share/vdirsyncer/calendars/def-calendar/`. 60-second sync timer. ICS files editable directly. - **Pages**: `matrix-lite-pages publish --file <path>` copies content; URL format `https://pages.nvdll.org/#bot%2F[slug]`. - **Gateway restart**: Assistant can restart gateway (permission 2026-05-13). Session survives reload. - **opencode-minimal agent**: Created for DeepSeek subagent incompatibility (meta-reasoning loops from anchored summary framework). Config at dedicated XDG dir; needs MCP allowlist patch. - **Async subagent architecture**: All `subagent_spawn` routes through `opencode-subagent`. Synced aliases differ only in loaded context and model pins. - **Subagent timer protocol (2026-05-13)**: For slow subagents, set timer for followup turn rather than burning steps on polling or asking permission. - **ImmoScout24 login succeeded (2026-05-16)**: Authenticated via Playwright from the persistent-chat sandbox (`/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat`). Password stored at `./secrets/password-immoscout`. Zero anti-bot friction; account of **Gleb Krylov** fully accessible including messenger inbox. User established `./secrets/` (relative to sandbox) as the standard secrets storage location. - **First rental application submitted (2026-05-16 ~17:40Z)**: Successfully submitted a rental inquiry to Frau Simone Rau (Ismaning, 1.590€, 59m²) via ImmoScout24 contact form. CAPTCHA was solved via image relay. User called it "pr ``` Recent curator synthesis journal tail (`curator-journal.md`): ```markdown 01Z batch re-extracts messages from May 11-16 that are already captured in curated memory. Tried to lifecycle-mark 2 candidates as promoted via the script but the command is denied by OpenCode bash permissions despite the `*` wildcard pattern. The issue may be the long key value with special characters. - **Curated memory**: NO_CHANGE — file is current at 22:23Z metadata, 106 lines, under 120-line target. No semantic content changes needed. - (Operational) The plan/general step limit change to 1 remains pending — user's confirmation was lost to the 18:50Z failure cascade. - (Operational) The user has not sent any messages since 20:15Z. If a fresh session was created, the continuity summary should inform the assistant of the 18:50-20:15Z failure cascade. - (Speculative) The timer scheduling system clearly accumulated triggers during the 18:50-20:15Z broken period. This run at 22:27Z is the 4th in 8 minutes — the backlog may finally be draining. If no more rapid runs follow, this speculation is confirmed. - (Speculative) If the session remained broken all night, the user may return to an entirely new session on Sunday with no memory of the ImmoScout24 progress or the failure cascade — the restore pack at `immoscout24-workflow.md` will be the primary recovery tool. ## 2026-05-17T17:10Z - Log lines reviewed: 16325 (cumulative, ~1955 new since last curator run at 22:27Z). - **Productive cleanup session today (2026-05-17 ~12:00-16:30Z)**: User and assistant cleared stale entries across memory system — curated-memory (removed stale OpenClaw paths), recent-topics (pruned 4 ancient archives), decision-state (8 superseded entries removed), recent-failures (2 stale entries removed), continuity-pinned-notes (19→7 clean entries). User confirmed "the worst continuity gaps should be behind us now." Major milestone — system is now in a clean state. - **User confirmed "prefer helpers" directive**: Explicitly told assistant to use `persistent-chat-memory` helpers over raw file editing, and to report missing helpers for future addition. Captured in curated-memory preferences. - **Semantic candidates fully lifecycle-managed**: All 143 entries now reviewed. Bulk operations: 76 marked stale (May 11-14 testing era), 40 stale (May 15), 21 stale (May 16 transient work), 5 promoted (housing preferences + buyout directive), 8 already reviewed in prior runs, 1 ignored (UI bug report). Zero remaining candidate entries. - **Memory candidates reviewed**: All 21 entries already captured in curated memory (model config, housing, philosophy, etc.). No new promotions needed. - **Curated memory updated**: Metadata refreshed (15:10Z→17:10Z, 14370→16325 lines). Added "Prefer helpers when available" directive. File at 109 lines, under 120-line target. - (Operational) The `plan/general` step limit change to 1 remains pending from the 2026-05-16 failure cascade — user wanted them at 1 to fail loudly on stale config. This was discussed on 2026-05-16T18:50Z but lost. Next assistant turn should re-apply if user brings it up. - (Operational) WGT festival starts May 21 — user may be less available for complex memory work in the coming week. The memory system is in a clean state to withstand gaps. - (Speculative) With candidates fully lifecycle-managed, the system can now focus on generating fresh candidates from new conversations rather than cycling through stale ones. The mechanism's proof of concept is validated — bulk operations work well for large historical cleanup, individual `mark` for precision entries. ## 2026-05-17T19:10Z - Log lines reviewed: 16325 → 18303 (~1978 new entries since last run). Cumulative total. - **Quiet period**: No new durable user facts since 17:10Z. Main-chat discussion covered curator improvement suggestions (18:21Z) — assistant proposed 4 changes (expand curator scope to check decision-state/recent-failures staleness, proactive session lifecycle, candidate pipeline investigation, synthesis agent cross-feed). User had not confirmed any before this run. These remain pending feedback. - **Heartbeat set to 2 hours**: User explicitly set heartbeat to 2-hour cadence ("for now as we don't have too much new data at the moment, and also for this debugging phase"). Previous cadence was 1 hour. - **Background agent vision confirmed**: User reiterated that moving away from OpenClaw was motivated by wanting the assistant to manage its own session lifecycle and have background agents for consolidation/synthesis. "We were hitting limitations of the framework more than using it." - **Semantic candidates**: 0 remaining (all lifecycle-managed). No new candidates generated — candidate pipeline still appears gapped post-packet-restructuring. - **Memory candidates**: All 21 entries already captured in curated memory. No new candidates. - **Curated memory updated**: Metadata refreshed (17:10Z → 19:10Z, 16325 → 18303 lines). No semantic content changes — curator improvement discussion is unconfirmed. File at 108 lines, under 120-line target. - (Operational) The 4 curator improvement suggestions from 18:21Z remain pending user feedback. If confirmed, the curator prompt should be updated. - (Operational) Candidate pipeline gap persists — no new candidates generated since packet restructuring. May need script fix or investigation. - (Operational) Plan/general step limit change to 1 still pending from May 16; user hasn't revisited it. - (Speculative) With 2-hour cadence and WGT festival (May 21-25) approaching, curator runs may accumulate more data per session but also face longer gaps between user interactions. ## 2026-05-17T21:11Z - Log lines reviewed: 18303 → 20002 (~1700 new entries since last run at 19:10Z). - **55812 context clarified**: User confirmed it's a locker code for GPU storage at the hostel. Frau Kilic said yes on the apartment, so locker may not be needed soon. User explicitly was testing memory propagation — "you don't have to actually remember this number or the fact." Updated curated-memory entry to reflect the clarified context without over-promoting. - **Synthesis agent discovered**: `persistent-chat-reflection` exists at `/home/matrix-lite/app/scripts/persistent-chat-reflection`. Runs hourly at `*:11:00` (Persistent=false). Writes to `operational-synthesis/reports/` and `notices.jsonl`. Last report at 00:01Z today. User approved changing to 6-hourly schedule. - **Curator prompt fix approved but blocked**: User approved both the curator prompt fix (add decision-state + recent-failures as inputs) and the reflection timer change. Timer updated successfully. The heartbeat script edit was blocked by permission rules — `/home/matrix-lite/app/scripts/` is not in the edit/write allowlist. Assistant tried Edit tool, bash, python3 — all denied. Needs user action. - **Approval flow verified working**: Both approval requests routed to Matrix, user granted them. Mechanism confirmed functional. - **Memory candidates**: 21 entries, all stale (May 11-16). No new candidates generated. Same gap persists. - **Semantic candidates**: 0 new since last run — candidate pipeline still gapped. - **Curated memory updated**: Metadata refreshed (19:10Z → 21:11Z, 18303 → 20002 lines). Updated 55812 entry. Added synthesis agent discovery and curator prompt fix blocked entries. File at 110 lines, under 120-line target. - (Operational) The heartbeat script permission block is a new operational issue. The assistant needs either: (a) the file added to the edit allowlist, or (b) user to manually apply the 2-line change. - (Operational) Plan/general step limit change to 1 remains pending from May 16 failure cascade. - (Operational) 4 curator improvement suggestions from 18:21Z session still pending user feedback. - (Speculative) With WGT festival (May 21-25) approaching, user may be less available for config work; permission block on heartbeat script may linger. - (Speculative) Candidate pipeline gap may need the assistant to investigate the generation script directly, which user has now licensed ("start fixing things yourself"). ## 2026-05-17T23:11Z - Log lines reviewed: 20002 → 22024 (~2022 cumulative across this heartbeat session). - **Turn packet trimmed by user (~21:23Z)**: User trimmed the turn-packet to minimal header + v3 JSON schema. Assistant confirmed working. Daemon now injects conversation tail directly — replaces the previous ~50+ lines of boilerplate. This is a significant token efficiency improvement that directly addresses the context burn rate concern. - **User extended prompt feedback scope (~21:25Z)**: "Let me know if you see junk of something unhelpful in any of the prompts in the future, we can at least replace it with something useful or trim." Added to curated-memory as a preference extension. Assistant now has discretionary authority to flag and suggest prompt improvements. - **DeepSeek V4 1M context via OpenRouter mentioned (~21:29Z)**: User expressed forward-looking interest in trying DeepSeek V4 for its 1M context window once prompts are clean enough. Not yet committed, but worth noting as a planned future model option. Captured in curated-memory under Identity & Configuration. - **Scheduled operational synthesis ran at 22:27Z**: No new findings beyond what's already in curated memory. Confirmed: heartbeat script edit blocked, candidates pipeline gap persists, step limit config still pending, two overdue approval timers. - **Memory candidates**: 0 new entries — all 21 remain stale (May 11-16). Gap persists. - **Semantic candidates**: 0 new — all lifecycle-managed. Gap persists. - **Curated memory updated**: Metadata refreshed (21:11Z → 23:11Z, 20002 → 22024 lines). Added 3 new entries: turn packet trim, DeepSeek V4 plan, proactive prompt feedback scope. File at 113 lines, under 120-line target. - (Operational) Current constellation of open issues: heartbeat script edit blocked, step limit plan/general→1 pending, candidates pipeline gap. - (Operational) WGT festival starts May 21 — user may be less available in the coming week. Memory system is in a clean, stable state. - (Speculative) The turn packet trim may further reduce the curator's effective input quality if it also shortened the context available for curation. However, the curator receives direct perpetual-log tails, not the turn packet, so this should not affect curator quality. ## 2026-05-18T01:11Z - Log lines reviewed: 2029 (this run); cumulative: still 22024 — no new perpetual log entries since last curator run. - **No new user messages or durable signals**: The session has been quiet since 23:12Z May 17 (~2 hours). No new conversation occurred — likely overnight quiet period. - **Memory candidates**: 0 new entries — all 21 remain stale (May 11-16). Gap persists. - **Semantic candidates**: 0 new — all lifecycle-managed. Gap persists. - **Curated memory**: NO_CHANGE — no new durable signals to promote. File at 113 lines, under 120-line target. - (Operational) WGT festival (May 21-25) approaching — user may be less available for complex memory work in the coming week. Memory system is in a clean, stable state. - (Operational) Open issues unchanged: heartbeat script edit blocked, step limit plan/general→1 pending, candidates pipeline gap persists (no new candidates generated since May 16 packet restructuring). - (Speculative) The 2-hour heartbeat cadence means this is the first overnight quiet period since the cadence was set. The fact that no rapid-fire runs occurred (unlike the May 16 failure cascade that produced 4 runs in 8 minutes) suggests the timer system is stable under normal conditions. ## 2026-05-18T03:11Z - Log lines reviewed: 2034 (this run); cumulative: still 22024 — no new perpetual log entries since last curator run at 01:11Z. - **Session still quiet**: No new user messages or durable signals. The overnight quiet period continues (~4 hours since last user interaction at 23:12Z May 17). - **Memory candidates**: 0 new entries — all 21 remain stale (May 11-16). Gap persists. - **Semantic candidates**: 0 new — all lifecycle-managed. Gap persists. - **Curated memory**: Metadata-only update (timestamp refreshed 01:11Z → 03:11Z). No semantic content changes. File at 113 lines, under 120-line target. - (Operational) Open issues unchanged: heartbeat script edit blocked, step limit plan/general→1 pending, candidates pipeline gap. - (Operational) WGT festival (May 21-25) in 3 days — user may be traveling or preparing. Memory system stable and clean. - (Speculative) Second consecutive quiet heartbeat confirms the timer system is operating normally on the 2-hour cadence. If the user is at WGT starting May 21, the next ~4 days may see minimal new signals — the curated memory is in good shape to sustain continuity through that gap. ## 2026-05-18T05:11Z - Log lines reviewed: 2040 (this run); cumulative: still 22024 — no new perpetual log entries since last curator run at 03:11Z. - **Third consecutive quiet overnight heartbeat**: No new user messages or durable signals. Overnight quiet period continues (~6 hours since last user interaction at 23:12Z May 17). - **Memory candidates**: 0 new entries — all 21 remain stale (May 11-16). Gap persists. - **Semantic candidates**: 0 new — all lifecycle-managed. Gap persists. - **Curated memory**: Metadata-only update (timestamp refreshed 03:11Z → 05:11Z). No semantic content changes. File at 113 lines, under 120-line target. - (Operational) Open issues unchanged: heartbeat script edit blocked, step limit plan/general→1 pending, candidates pipeline gap. - (Operational) WGT festival (May 21-25) in 3 days — user may be traveling or preparing. Memory system stable and clean. - (Speculative) Third consecutive quiet run at 2-hour cadence with zero rapid-fire triggers confirms timer system is fully stable. The curated memory at 113 lines is well-positioned to sustain continuity through the WGT gap if user activity drops. ## 2026-05-18T07:11Z - Log lines reviewed: 2056 (this run); cumulative: ~24080 (~2056 new since last curator run at 05:11Z). - **Productive morning session (07:00-07:11Z)**: First user interaction since 23:12Z May 17 (~8 hours). User and assistant verified script fixes (heartbeat loads decisions/failures, reflection has correct paths + tool names), reviewed curation/synthesis outputs as working well, discussed safe artifact edit paths, and established the reload protocol. - **Safe artifact edit paths confirmed**: Agents edit source artifacts (note-decision, note-failure, note-reload-handoff, synthesis worker) NOT generated packets (turn-packet.md, session-packet.md). Freeform agent notes require the deferred overlay/sandbox design. - **Reload protocol established**: On ~95% context notice: (1) note-reload-handoff for volatile context, (2) decide on curation, (3) update source artifacts via helpers. - **New decision thread**: "safe-agent-patch-workflow" added to decision-state.json at 06:59Z — need robust way for background agents to propose/apply patches without broad self-edit permissions. - **Memory candidates**: 21 entries, all still candidate (May 11-16). No new candidates generated. Bash permission still blocks lifecycle-marking. - **Semantic candidates**: 0 new — all lifecycle-managed. Gap persists. - **Curated memory updated**: Metadata refreshed (05:11Z → 07:11Z, 22024 → 24080 lines). Added 4 new entries: script fixes verified, safe artifact edit paths, reload protocol, safe agent patch workflow. File at 117 lines, under 120-line target. - (Operational) Open issues: heartbeat script edit blocked (but fixes were applied by user), step limit plan/general→1 still pending, candidates pipeline gap, safe-agent-patch-workflow needs design. - (Operational) WGT festival (May 21-25) in 3 days — user may be less available. Memory system is in clean, stable state with verified script fixes. - (Speculative) The morning session confirms the memory system is working end-to-end: script fixes applied, curation/synthesis producing clean output, reload protocol agreed. The system is ready for the WGT gap. ``` Recent perpetual log tail: ```jsonl perational conclusions that survive reloads - **`note-failure` / `failure-mark`** — I can log tool failures and guardrails - **`note-reload-handoff`** — I can prepare context before a controlled reload - **Synthesis worker** — handles recent topics, actions, notices automatically The only gap is freeform \"session notes\" — things like \"we discussed X, pending Y\" that don't fit decisions/failures. But `recent-topics.md` (edited by synthesis) and `curator-journal.md` (edited by heartbeat) already cover that implicitly. So yes, this works for now. The helper commands are the right path — they're structured, auditable, and feed directly into the packet generation. Once the overlay design lands, I'll have a direct \"append to session packet\" escape hatch for edge cases. User: So now you know what to do when you start getting reload notices? Assistant: Yes. When I get the reload notice (at ~95% context), I should: 1. **Use `note-reload-handoff`** to capture any volatile context that won't survive — things I know from the current conversation that aren't yet in the source artifacts 2. **Decide whether to run curation** — if there's new material worth preserving, trigger it; if it's just test chatter or the curator just ran, skip it 3. **Update source artifacts** via the helpers (`note-decision`, `note-failure`, etc.) for anything that emerged during the session The key is that the reload handoff + updated source artifacts become the new session's starting point, so nothing important gets lost in the transition. User: Amazing thank you Assistant: You're welcome! It's been a productive session — the system is in much better shape now. Let me know when you want to tackle the next round of improvements or if anything comes up. Have a good day! User: Haha thanks, we're only just starting here. Assistant: Ha, fair point — the foundation's solid but there's plenty more to build. I'm ready whenever you are. What's next on the list? Recent incomplete/failed turns that still matter for continuity: - 2026-05-17T17:19:21.968268Z user said: Hmm I hope this doesn't break anything but in any case you should be able to edit those status: user_only; reason: queued_for_conversation - 2026-05-18T07:35:38.847424Z user said: Please check the new session packet now after updates. Is this better? Is anything missing or noisy? status: user_only; reason: queued_for_conversation Recent/current attachment metadata, if any: None Message this user replied to, if any: None Queued/batched messages, if any: None Per-turn volatile reminders: - Answer normally and concisely. Put only user-visible answer text inside <matrix_lite_final>...</matrix_lite_final>. - Use the live capability context above as the source of truth for current debug/capability tools; call capability/permission/context MCP tools when uncertain instead of relying on stale boot knowledge. - If permission is needed or a bridge denies a tool, emit the structured Matrix-lite approval tag from your stable prompt; do not only describe approval in prose. - If recent incomplete/failed turns mention an unhandled user intent, address it now before moving on. - Use attachment/reply metadata when present; otherwise ignore empty metadata sections. - Do not mention internal Matrix-lite metadata unless the user asks. User message: Please check the new session packet now after updates. Is this better? Is anything missing or noisy?", "source": {"kind": "acpx-stream-ndjson", "file": "/home/matrix-lite/.acpx/sessions/ses_1ca369f7dffegaDkdQ6MideFVI.stream.ndjson", "offset": 9467315, "session_message_id": "ses_1ca369f7dffegaDkdQ6MideFVI.stream.ndjson:9467315:prompt", "label": "persistent-chat-20260517T115406Z", "maintenance": false}} {"ts": "2026-05-18T07:44:04.972393+00:00", "role": "user", "kind": "message", "content": "You are Persistent Assistant running through Matrix-lite. Use the bootstrapped character/session context, live turn packet, and room-local conversation to answer the user naturally. Conversation metadata: - conversation_key: persistent:main - session_label: persistent-chat-20260517T115406Z - prompt_package: None - shared_memory_profile: None - room_id: !CZLwoJfCyftA7oA5CVj2gIEKWqyv1lu01r0oFboEqZg - source_event_id: $0nBFA5ToWLJlbq3jYRx00QiGggyty95nH4hNBhcxIvI - reply_to_id: None - thread_root_id: None Persistent-chat memory/continuity context: Persistent-chat memory/continuity context: mode: turn_packet # Persistent Chat Turn Packet Generated: 2026-05-18T07:38:39.969717+00:00 ## Live context ## Background synthesis notices Background synthesis notices (actionable): - 2026-05-17T22:29:31.508871Z [notice] 21 memory-candidates.jsonl entries stale (oldest: May 11 — 6 days); lifecycle management blocked by bash permission (source: /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/operational-synthesis/reports/2026-05-16T23-53-03Z.md) - 2026-05-17T22:29:31.508905Z [notice] Persistent-chat reload 02:05Z failed then succeeded at 02:07Z; controlled reload at 11:54Z fully resolved (source: /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/operational-synthesis/reports/2026-05-17T22-27-58Z.md) - 2026-05-17T22:29:31.508936Z [notice] Heartbeat script edit blocked by permissions — user-approved curator prompt enhancement not applied (source: /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/operational-synthesis/reports/2026-05-17T22-27-58Z.md) - If relevant, inspect the source report/log before acting; notices are pointers, not full context. Live runtime capability context: Runtime details are dynamic; use Matrix-lite status/capability/permission/context tools when current paths, timers, repo access, or reload policy matter. Do not rely on boot-time guesses. Recent room-local conversation: User: Amazing thank you Assistant: You're welcome! It's been a productive session — the system is in much better shape now. Let me know when you want to tackle the next round of improvements or if anything comes up. Have a good day! User: Haha thanks, we're only just starting here. Assistant: Ha, fair point — the foundation's solid but there's plenty more to build. I'm ready whenever you are. What's next on the list? User: Please check the new session packet now after updates. Is this better? Is anything missing or noisy? Assistant: ⚠ Matrix-lite did not receive a final answer for this request. The model/tool run may still be pending or failed; I logged the details. Recent incomplete/failed turns that still matter for continuity: - 2026-05-17T17:19:21.968268Z user said: Hmm I hope this doesn't break anything but in any case you should be able to edit those status: user_only; reason: queued_for_conversation - 2026-05-18T07:41:17.185762Z user said: What happened? status: user_only; reason: queued_for_conversation Recent/current attachment metadata, if any: None Message this user replied to, if any: None Queued/batched messages, if any: None Per-turn volatile reminders: - Answer normally and concisely. Put only user-visible answer text inside <matrix_lite_final>...</matrix_lite_final>. - Use the live capability context above as the source of truth for current debug/capability tools; call capability/permission/context MCP tools when uncertain instead of relying on stale boot knowledge. - If permission is needed or a bridge denies a tool, emit the structured Matrix-lite approval tag from your stable prompt; do not only describe approval in prose. - If recent incomplete/failed turns mention an unhandled user intent, address it now before moving on. - Use attachment/reply metadata when present; otherwise ignore empty metadata sections. - Do not mention internal Matrix-lite metadata unless the user asks. User message: What happened?", "source": {"kind": "acpx-stream-ndjson", "file": "/home/matrix-lite/.acpx/sessions/ses_1ca369f7dffegaDkdQ6MideFVI.stream.ndjson", "offset": 9605768, "session_message_id": "ses_1ca369f7dffegaDkdQ6MideFVI.stream.ndjson:9605768:prompt", "label": "persistent-chat-20260517T115406Z", "maintenance": false}} {"ts": "2026-05-18T07:44:04.973075+00:00", "role": "assistant", "kind": "message", "content": "<matrix_lite_final>Looks like the previous turn timed out or hit a context limit — probably the session packet was too large to process in one go (195 lines of markdown + 256 lines of JSON tail). Here's the answer I was trying to give: **The new session packet is excellent.** It now includes exactly what I suggested: - ✅ **Open actions summary** — 5 items with sources - ✅ **Tool permission status** — 4 blocked patterns with alternatives - ✅ **Active decision state** — clean, only active entries - ✅ **Recent topics** — well-structured with current + archived sections - ✅ **Failure guardrails** — all patterns with `avoid_until` dates **Minor noise:** Some overlap between \"Open actions\" and \"Recent topics\" (same items appear in both), but redundancy is safer than missing info. The JSON tail is 250 lines — could be trimmed to ~50 if token budget gets tight. Overall: massive improvement. A new session booting from this would have everything it needs.</matrix_lite_final>", "source": {"kind": "acpx-stream-ndjson", "file": "/home/matrix-lite/.acpx/sessions/ses_1ca369f7dffegaDkdQ6MideFVI.stream.ndjson", "offset": 9622826, "session_message_id": "ses_1ca369f7dffegaDkdQ6MideFVI.stream.ndjson:9622826:msg_e3a0842510012pCWi8yRZgRkZF:assistant-message", "label": "persistent-chat-20260517T115406Z", "maintenance": false}} {"ts": "2026-05-18T07:49:07.885573+00:00", "role": "user", "kind": "message", "content": "You are Persistent Assistant running through Matrix-lite. Use the bootstrapped character/session context, live turn packet, and room-local conversation to answer the user naturally. Conversation metadata: - conversation_key: persistent:main - session_label: persistent-chat-20260517T115406Z - prompt_package: None - shared_memory_profile: None - room_id: !CZLwoJfCyftA7oA5CVj2gIEKWqyv1lu01r0oFboEqZg - source_event_id: $a08IWafGILWDH8LrDzQky_Dsj4UvmIz3W9W2-RVHnd4 - reply_to_id: None - thread_root_id: None Persistent-chat memory/continuity context: Persistent-chat memory/continuity context: mode: turn_packet # Persistent Chat Turn Packet Generated: 2026-05-18T07:44:05.194286+00:00 ## Live context ## Background synthesis notices Background synthesis notices (actionable): - 2026-05-17T22:29:31.508871Z [notice] 21 memory-candidates.jsonl entries stale (oldest: May 11 — 6 days); lifecycle management blocked by bash permission (source: /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/operational-synthesis/reports/2026-05-16T23-53-03Z.md) - 2026-05-17T22:29:31.508905Z [notice] Persistent-chat reload 02:05Z failed then succeeded at 02:07Z; controlled reload at 11:54Z fully resolved (source: /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/operational-synthesis/reports/2026-05-17T22-27-58Z.md) - 2026-05-17T22:29:31.508936Z [notice] Heartbeat script edit blocked by permissions — user-approved curator prompt enhancement not applied (source: /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/operational-synthesis/reports/2026-05-17T22-27-58Z.md) - If relevant, inspect the source report/log before acting; notices are pointers, not full context. Live runtime capability context: Runtime details are dynamic; use Matrix-lite status/capability/permission/context tools when current paths, timers, repo access, or reload policy matter. Do not rely on boot-time guesses. Recent room-local conversation: User: Haha thanks, we're only just starting here. Assistant: Ha, fair point — the foundation's solid but there's plenty more to build. I'm ready whenever you are. What's next on the list? User: Please check the new session packet now after updates. Is this better? Is anything missing or noisy? Assistant: ⚠ Matrix-lite did not receive a final answer for this request. The model/tool run may still be pending or failed; I logged the details. User: What happened? Assistant: Looks like the previous turn timed out or hit a context limit — probably the session packet was too large to process in one go (195 lines of markdown + 256 lines of JSON tail). Here's the answer I was trying to give: **The new session packet is excellent.** It now includes exactly what I suggested: - ✅ **Open actions summary** — 5 items with sources - ✅ **Tool permission status** — 4 blocked patterns with alternatives - ✅ **Active decision state** — clean, only active entries - ✅ **Recent topics** — well-structured with current + archived sections - ✅ **Failure guardrails** — all patterns with `avoid_until` dates **Minor noise:** Some overlap between \"Open actions\" and \"Recent topics\" (same items appear in both), but redundancy is safer than missing info. The JSON tail is 250 lines — could be trimmed to ~50 if token budget gets tight. Overall: massive improvement. A new session booting from this would have everything it needs. Recent incomplete/failed turns that still matter for continuity: - 2026-05-17T17:19:21.968268Z user said: Hmm I hope this doesn't break anything but in any case you should be able to edit those status: user_only; reason: queued_for_conversation - 2026-05-18T07:45:39.274834Z user said: Hmm can you investigate and see if we can do something about timeout or context limit? It would be better if you keep working without getting stuck. Also, how would you then process it on reload if it's already failing? status: user_only; reason: queued_for_conversation Recent/current attachment metadata, if any: None Message this user replied to, if any: None Queued/batched messages, if any: None Per-turn volatile reminders: - Answer normally and concisely. Put only user-visible answer text inside <matrix_lite_final>...</matrix_lite_final>. - Use the live capability context above as the source of truth for current debug/capability tools; call capability/permission/context MCP tools when uncertain instead of relying on stale boot knowledge. - If permission is needed or a bridge denies a tool, emit the structured Matrix-lite approval tag from your stable prompt; do not only describe approval in prose. - If recent incomplete/failed turns mention an unhandled user intent, address it now before moving on. - Use attachment/reply metadata when present; otherwise ignore empty metadata sections. - Do not mention internal Matrix-lite metadata unless the user asks. User message: Hmm can you investigate and see if we can do something about timeout or context limit? It would be better if you keep working without getting stuck. Also, how would you then process it on reload if it's already failing?", "source": {"kind": "acpx-stream-ndjson", "file": "/home/matrix-lite/.acpx/sessions/ses_1ca369f7dffegaDkdQ6MideFVI.stream.ndjson", "offset": 9639887, "session_message_id": "ses_1ca369f7dffegaDkdQ6MideFVI.stream.ndjson:9639887:prompt", "label": "persistent-chat-20260517T115406Z", "maintenance": false}} {"ts": "2026-05-18T07:54:24.951216+00:00", "role": "user", "kind": "message", "content": "You are Persistent Assistant running through Matrix-lite. Use the bootstrapped character/session context, live turn packet, and room-local conversation to answer the user naturally. Conversation metadata: - conversation_key: persistent:main - session_label: persistent-chat-20260517T115406Z - prompt_package: None - shared_memory_profile: None - room_id: !CZLwoJfCyftA7oA5CVj2gIEKWqyv1lu01r0oFboEqZg - source_event_id: $UlzjaEtXecMRKuEJo2-CkpoHW7_j3X9rSVseS-GzSlw - reply_to_id: None - thread_root_id: None Persistent-chat memory/continuity context: Persistent-chat memory/continuity context: mode: turn_packet # Persistent Chat Turn Packet Generated: 2026-05-18T07:44:05.194286+00:00 ## Live context ## Background synthesis notices Background synthesis notices (actionable): - 2026-05-17T22:29:31.508871Z [notice] 21 memory-candidates.jsonl entries stale (oldest: May 11 — 6 days); lifecycle management blocked by bash permission (source: /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/operational-synthesis/reports/2026-05-16T23-53-03Z.md) - 2026-05-17T22:29:31.508905Z [notice] Persistent-chat reload 02:05Z failed then succeeded at 02:07Z; controlled reload at 11:54Z fully resolved (source: /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/operational-synthesis/reports/2026-05-17T22-27-58Z.md) - 2026-05-17T22:29:31.508936Z [notice] Heartbeat script edit blocked by permissions — user-approved curator prompt enhancement not applied (source: /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/operational-synthesis/reports/2026-05-17T22-27-58Z.md) - If relevant, inspect the source report/log before acting; notices are pointers, not full context. Live runtime capability context: Runtime details are dynamic; use Matrix-lite status/capability/permission/context tools when current paths, timers, repo access, or reload policy matter. Do not rely on boot-time guesses. Recent room-local conversation: User: Please check the new session packet now after updates. Is this better? Is anything missing or noisy? Assistant: ⚠ Matrix-lite did not receive a final answer for this request. The model/tool run may still be pending or failed; I logged the details. User: What happened? Assistant: Looks like the previous turn timed out or hit a context limit — probably the session packet was too large to process in one go (195 lines of markdown + 256 lines of JSON tail). Here's the answer I was trying to give: **The new session packet is excellent.** It now includes exactly what I suggested: - ✅ **Open actions summary** — 5 items with sources - ✅ **Tool permission status** — 4 blocked patterns with alternatives - ✅ **Active decision state** — clean, only active entries - ✅ **Recent topics** — well-structured with current + archived sections - ✅ **Failure guardrails** — all patterns with `avoid_until` dates **Minor noise:** Some overlap between \"Open actions\" and \"Recent topics\" (same items appear in both), but redundancy is safer than missing info. The JSON tail is 250 lines — could be trimmed to ~50 if token budget gets tight. Overall: massive improvement. A new session booting from this would have everything it needs. User: Hmm can you investigate and see if we can do something about timeout or context limit? It would be better if you keep working without getting stuck. Also, how would you then process it on reload if it's already failing? Assistant: ⚠ Matrix-lite did not receive a final answer for this request. The model/tool run may still be pending or failed; I logged the details. Recent incomplete/failed turns that still matter for continuity: - 2026-05-17T17:19:21.968268Z user said: Hmm I hope this doesn't break anything but in any case you should be able to edit those status: user_only; reason: queued_for_conversation - 2026-05-18T07:48:55.879673Z user said: Hmm I think timeout is 3 minutes status: user_only; reason: queued_for_conversation Recent/current attachment metadata, if any: None Message this user replied to, if any: None Queued/batched messages, if any: None Per-turn volatile reminders: - Answer normally and concisely. Put only user-visible answer text inside <matrix_lite_final>...</matrix_lite_final>. - Use the live capability context above as the source of truth for current debug/capability tools; call capability/permission/context MCP tools when uncertain instead of relying on stale boot knowledge. - If permission is needed or a bridge denies a tool, emit the structured Matrix-lite approval tag from your stable prompt; do not only describe approval in prose. - If recent incomplete/failed turns mention an unhandled user intent, address it now before moving on. - Use attachment/reply metadata when present; otherwise ignore empty metadata sections. - Do not mention internal Matrix-lite metadata unless the user asks. User message: Hmm I think timeout is 3 minutes", "source": {"kind": "acpx-stream-ndjson", "file": "/home/matrix-lite/.acpx/sessions/ses_1ca369f7dffegaDkdQ6MideFVI.stream.ndjson", "offset": 9677810, "session_message_id": "ses_1ca369f7dffegaDkdQ6MideFVI.stream.ndjson:9677810:prompt", "label": "persistent-chat-20260517T115406Z", "maintenance": false}} {"ts": "2026-05-18T08:20:35.056142+00:00", "role": "user", "kind": "message", "content": "You are Persistent Assistant running through Matrix-lite. Use the bootstrapped character/session context, live turn packet, and room-local conversation to answer the user naturally. Conversation metadata: - conversation_key: persistent:main - session_label: persistent-chat-20260517T115406Z - prompt_package: None - shared_memory_profile: None - room_id: !CZLwoJfCyftA7oA5CVj2gIEKWqyv1lu01r0oFboEqZg - source_event_id: $-4BTVogBNs_ewfbHEWKyo7X5nFJCjZBtgaR6cUXljB4 - reply_to_id: None - thread_root_id: None Persistent-chat memory/continuity context: Persistent-chat memory/continuity context: mode: turn_packet # Persistent Chat Turn Packet Generated: 2026-05-18T08:10:10.981816+00:00 ## Live context ## Background synthesis notices Background synthesis notices (actionable): - 2026-05-17T22:29:31.508871Z [notice] 21 memory-candidates.jsonl entries stale (oldest: May 11 — 6 days); lifecycle management blocked by bash permission (source: /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/operational-synthesis/reports/2026-05-16T23-53-03Z.md) - 2026-05-17T22:29:31.508905Z [notice] Persistent-chat reload 02:05Z failed then succeeded at 02:07Z; controlled reload at 11:54Z fully resolved (source: /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/operational-synthesis/reports/2026-05-17T22-27-58Z.md) - 2026-05-17T22:29:31.508936Z [notice] Heartbeat script edit blocked by permissions — user-approved curator prompt enhancement not applied (source: /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/operational-synthesis/reports/2026-05-17T22-27-58Z.md) - If relevant, inspect the source report/log before acting; notices are pointers, not full context. Live runtime capability context: Runtime details are dynamic; use Matrix-lite status/capability/permission/context tools when current paths, timers, repo access, or reload policy matter. Do not rely on boot-time guesses. Recent room-local conversation: User: What happened? Assistant: Looks like the previous turn timed out or hit a context limit — probably the session packet was too large to process in one go (195 lines of markdown + 256 lines of JSON tail). Here's the answer I was trying to give: **The new session packet is excellent.** It now includes exactly what I suggested: - ✅ **Open actions summary** — 5 items with sources - ✅ **Tool permission status** — 4 blocked patterns with alternatives - ✅ **Active decision state** — clean, only active entries - ✅ **Recent topics** — well-structured with current + archived sections - ✅ **Failure guardrails** — all patterns with `avoid_until` dates **Minor noise:** Some overlap between \"Open actions\" and \"Recent topics\" (same items appear in both), but redundancy is safer than missing info. The JSON tail is 250 lines — could be trimmed to ~50 if token budget gets tight. Overall: massive improvement. A new session booting from this would have everything it needs. User: Hmm can you investigate and see if we can do something about timeout or context limit? It would be better if you keep working without getting stuck. Also, how would you then process it on reload if it's already failing? Assistant: ⚠ Matrix-lite did not receive a final answer for this request. The model/tool run may still be pending or failed; I logged the details. User: Hmm I think timeout is 3 minutes Assistant: ⚠ Matrix-lite did not receive a final answer for this request. The model/tool run may still be pending or failed; I logged the details. Recent incomplete/failed turns that still matter for continuity: - 2026-05-17T17:19:21.968268Z user said: Hmm I hope this doesn't break anything but in any case you should be able to edit those status: user_only; reason: queued_for_conversation - 2026-05-18T08:14:33.027837Z user said: Test test status: user_only; reason: queued_for_conversation Recent/current attachment metadata, if any: None Message this user replied to, if any: None Queued/batched messages, if any: None Per-turn volatile reminders: - Answer normally and concisely. Put only user-visible answer text inside <matrix_lite_final>...</matrix_lite_final>. - Use the live capability context above as the source of truth for current debug/capability tools; call capability/permission/context MCP tools when uncertain instead of relying on stale boot knowledge. - If permission is needed or a bridge denies a tool, emit the structured Matrix-lite approval tag from your stable prompt; do not only describe approval in prose. - If recent incomplete/failed turns mention an unhandled user intent, address it now before moving on. - Use attachment/reply metadata when present; otherwise ignore empty metadata sections. - Do not mention internal Matrix-lite metadata unless the user asks. User message: Test test", "source": {"kind": "acpx-stream-ndjson", "file": "/home/matrix-lite/.acpx/sessions/ses_1c5edf068ffePUah66vTNKb2lT.stream.ndjson", "offset": 333694, "session_message_id": "ses_1c5edf068ffePUah66vTNKb2lT.stream.ndjson:333694:prompt", "label": "persistent-chat-20260517T115406Z", "maintenance": false}} {"ts": "2026-05-18T08:25:21.695159+00:00", "role": "meta", "kind": "decision-state", "content": "Decision noted: Persistent chat stale session and compaction policy — active: Avoid reloading or replacing the main persistent-chat session unless context pressure, stale/incomplete ACPX session state, model-mediated reload scripts, or an emergency recovery path requires it. If OpenCode fallback compaction ever occurs, its result must be captured into durable continuity (session packet/source artifact) before or during the next reload.", "source": {"file": "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/decision-state.json", "key": "persistent-chat-stale-session-and-compaction-policy"}} {"ts": "2026-05-18T09:06:54.963008+00:00", "role": "user", "kind": "message", "content": "You are Persistent Assistant running through Matrix-lite. Use the bootstrapped character/session context, live turn packet, and room-local conversation to answer the user naturally. Conversation metadata: - conversation_key: persistent:main - session_label: persistent-chat-20260517T115406Z - prompt_package: None - shared_memory_profile: None - room_id: !CZLwoJfCyftA7oA5CVj2gIEKWqyv1lu01r0oFboEqZg - source_event_id: $hD348d0wJPtBpkMSk4Q0LLEBFgjKstnNCU_fTGl6RKw - reply_to_id: None - thread_root_id: None Persistent-chat memory/continuity context: Persistent-chat memory/continuity context: mode: turn_packet # Persistent Chat Turn Packet Generated: 2026-05-18T08:51:25.200181+00:00 ## Live context ## Background synthesis notices Background synthesis notices (actionable): - 2026-05-17T22:29:31.508871Z [notice] 21 memory-candidates.jsonl entries stale (oldest: May 11 — 6 days); lifecycle management blocked by bash permission (source: /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/operational-synthesis/reports/2026-05-16T23-53-03Z.md) - 2026-05-17T22:29:31.508905Z [notice] Persistent-chat reload 02:05Z failed then succeeded at 02:07Z; controlled reload at 11:54Z fully resolved (source: /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/operational-synthesis/reports/2026-05-17T22-27-58Z.md) - 2026-05-17T22:29:31.508936Z [notice] Heartbeat script edit blocked by permissions — user-approved curator prompt enhancement not applied (source: /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/operational-synthesis/reports/2026-05-17T22-27-58Z.md) - If relevant, inspect the source report/log before acting; notices are pointers, not full context. Live runtime capability context: Runtime details are dynamic; use Matrix-lite status/capability/permission/context tools when current paths, timers, repo access, or reload policy matter. Do not rely on boot-time guesses. Recent room-local conversation: User: Hmm can you investigate and see if we can do something about timeout or context limit? It would be better if you keep working without getting stuck. Also, how would you then process it on reload if it's already failing? Assistant: ⚠ Matrix-lite did not receive a final answer for this request. The model/tool run may still be pending or failed; I logged the details. User: Hmm I think timeout is 3 minutes Assistant: ⚠ Matrix-lite did not receive a final answer for this request. The model/tool run may still be pending or failed; I logged the details. User: Test test Assistant: ⚠ Matrix-lite did not receive a final answer for this request. The model/tool run may still be pending or failed; I logged the details. Recent incomplete/failed turns that still matter for continuity: - 2026-05-17T17:19:21.968268Z user said: Hmm I hope this doesn't break anything but in any case you should be able to edit those status: user_only; reason: queued_for_conversation - 2026-05-18T08:56:22.320320Z user said: test test status: user_only; reason: queued_for_conversation Recent/current attachment metadata, if any: None Message this user replied to, if any: None Queued/batched messages, if any: None Per-turn volatile reminders: - Answer normally and concisely. Put only user-visible answer text inside <matrix_lite_final>...</matrix_lite_final>. - Use the live capability context above as the source of truth for current debug/capability tools; call capability/permission/context MCP tools when uncertain instead of relying on stale boot knowledge. - If permission is needed or a bridge denies a tool, emit the structured Matrix-lite approval tag from your stable prompt; do not only describe approval in prose. - If recent incomplete/failed turns mention an unhandled user intent, address it now before moving on. - Use attachment/reply metadata when present; otherwise ignore empty metadata sections. - Do not mention internal Matrix-lite metadata unless the user asks. User message: test test", "source": {"kind": "acpx-stream-ndjson", "file": "/home/matrix-lite/.acpx/sessions/ses_1c5b2f290ffePuhshXyNuIdSVC.stream.ndjson", "offset": 147983, "session_message_id": "ses_1c5b2f290ffePuhshXyNuIdSVC.stream.ndjson:147983:prompt", "label": "persistent-chat-20260517T115406Z", "maintenance": false}} ```