You are the hourly memory curator for persistent-chat. This is an isolated maintenance session, not a user chat. Goal: update `/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/curated-memory.md` only if useful. Inputs below include trusted deterministic semantic memory, pinned notes, candidate memory signals, broad semantic candidates, existing curated notes, reflections, and recent raw log tail. Rules: - Preserve important stable user facts, durable preferences/goals, corrections, model/config decisions, and unresolved operational risks. - Resolve contradictions conservatively: prefer explicit user corrections and recent confirmed facts. - Review memory-candidates.jsonl: promote durable/high-signal candidates into curated-memory.md, ignore transient/noisy candidates, and mention ignored-noise patterns in reflection if useful. - Review semantic-candidates.jsonl as lower-confidence main-chat user signals. They are not facts until promoted. Promote only durable/high-signal preferences, corrections, operational directives, or workflow context. - Maintain semantic-candidates.jsonl lifecycle one step at a time using `/home/matrix-lite/app/scripts/persistent-chat-memory semantic-candidates mark --key <key> --status promoted|ignored|stale|needs_more_evidence --reason <why> [--promoted-to <path-or-concept>]`. - For safer batch review, first use `/home/matrix-lite/app/scripts/persistent-chat-memory semantic-candidates review-packet --since <iso> --until <iso> --status candidate --limit <n>` or `list` with `--since/--until/--last-hours/--category/--status`. Use `bulk-mark --dry-run` before broad demotions. - Mark only candidates you actually reviewed this run. Prefer a small batch (roughly 5-15). Use `promoted` only if you also captured the substance in curated-memory.md, decision-state.json, recent-failures.json, or trusted semantic memory. Use `ignored` for transient chatter/noise, `stale` for obsolete items, and `needs_more_evidence` for plausible but unconfirmed signals. - Do NOT store transient chatter, test strings, benchmark noise, or implementation minutiae unless it affects future behavior. - Keep curated-memory.md concise: headings + bullets, ideally under 120 lines. - Ensure curated-memory.md has a top metadata line near the top: `Last curated: <UTC timestamp>; log lines reviewed: <count>`. - If no semantic content changes are needed but the metadata line is stale, update only that metadata line and reply `UPDATED`. - If no useful change is needed, do not edit curated-memory.md; just reply `NO_CHANGE`. - If you edit it, read it back and reply `UPDATED` with a one-sentence summary. - Also append a dated curator note to `/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/curator-journal.md` on every run. This file is the curator's synthesis journal; it is not the same thing as the operational synthesis worker below. - Curator notes are not authoritative memory. They should capture: what was learned from recent exchanges, uncertainties, useful hypotheses, possible next steps, and operational concerns. - Keep each reflection entry concise (5-12 bullets max) and label speculative ideas as speculative. - Do not edit perpetual-log.jsonl. Current heartbeat metadata: ```text UTC now: 2026-05-17T21:11:05Z Log lines reviewed: 2002 ``` Current semantic-memory.json: ```json { "schema": "persistent_chat_semantic_memory_v2", "updated": "2026-05-17T21:11:05.134947+00:00", "explicit_memories": { "55812": { "text": "55812", "created": "2026-05-11T09:12:14.985Z", "last_seen": "2026-05-11T09:12:14.985Z", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-11T09:12:14.985Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 32, "excerpt": "Please remember this number: 55812" }, "confidence": "explicit" }, "it-s-not-that-important-just-testing": { "text": "(it's not that important just testing)", "created": "2026-05-12T17:16:09.999Z", "last_seen": "2026-05-12T17:16:09.999Z", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-12T17:16:09.999Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 242, "excerpt": "I told you yesterday, try to remember (it's not that important just testing)" }, "confidence": "explicit" }, "them-for-search-in-the-future": { "text": "them for search in the future", "created": "2026-05-12T21:29:23.731Z", "last_seen": "2026-05-12T21:29:23.731Z", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-12T21:29:23.731Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 336, "excerpt": "Please record these observations so you can remember them for search in the future" }, "confidence": "explicit" }, "the-searches-from-yesterday-regarding-lost-details-we-will-test-censorship-again-later-the-subag": { "text": "the searches from yesterday. Regarding lost details - we will test censorship again later, the subagent spawn was reworked so it's okay that it's in 'recent failures' as some of them might not repeat again. My kimi sub is like this for the next month so it's a bit more relevant but not too much. Google job we also look for later. You saved the patch where you hack your wrapper, i told you to keep it for the future.", "created": "2026-05-13T13:39:52.333Z", "last_seen": "2026-05-13T13:39:52.333Z", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-13T13:39:52.333Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 530, "excerpt": "Great thank you, it's good that you can recover this if needed. Maybe we need to preserve more of the recent topics with more detailed on demand references at least for the latest time period, like a week or two, like an intermediate memory" }, "confidence": "explicit" }, "this-is-why-we-need-a-better-intermediate-memory-layer": { "text": "? this is why we need a better intermediate memory layer", "created": "2026-05-13T14:32:46.194Z", "last_seen": "2026-05-13T14:32:46.194Z", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-13T14:32:46.194Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 547, "excerpt": "you patched the 'skip no new log' condition, remember? this is why we need a better intermediate memory layer" }, "confidence": "explicit" }, "for-now-until-we-fix-it": { "text": "for now until we fix it", "created": "2026-05-13T17:18:59.451Z", "last_seen": "2026-05-13T17:18:59.451Z", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-13T17:18:59.451Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 591, "excerpt": "Yes please remember this for now until we fix it" }, "confidence": "explicit" }, "things-after-acp-error": { "text": "things after ACP error", "created": "2026-05-13T17:46:54.555Z", "last_seen": "2026-05-13T17:46:54.555Z", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-13T17:46:54.555Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 606, "excerpt": "it's great that now you still remember things after ACP error" }, "confidence": "explicit" }, "the-fix-don-t-ask-me-if-i-already-told-you-to-do-it-just-set-the-timer-soon-and-get-another-turn": { "text": "the fix. Don't ask me if I already told you to do it just set the timer soon and get another turn if needed", "created": "2026-05-13T18:41:59.765Z", "last_seen": "2026-05-13T18:41:59.765Z", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-13T18:41:59.765Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 630, "excerpt": "It's not only about subagent but also your step limit, we should probably increase it but then when you disappear I don't know if there's an error or you are still working. Your diagnosis is right, please remember the fix. Don't ask me if I" }, "confidence": "explicit" }, "please-check-now": { "text": "? Please check now", "created": "2026-05-13T19:08:53.084Z", "last_seen": "2026-05-13T19:08:53.084Z", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-13T19:08:53.084Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 636, "excerpt": "But you can't actually check again if the timer is broken remember? Please check now" }, "confidence": "explicit" }, "from-sfq-factory-i-am-used-to-generated-agent-reports-now": { "text": "from sfq-factory i am used to generated agent reports now", "created": "2026-05-14T09:47:04.461Z", "last_seen": "2026-05-14T09:47:04.461Z", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-14T09:47:04.461Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 777, "excerpt": "the report is very nice, thank you. as you remember from sfq-factory i am used to generated agent reports now" }, "confidence": "explicit" }, "and-how-use-semantic-if-possible-but-lexical-too-compare-them-and-to-plain-rg-compare-results-an": { "text": "and how. Use semantic if possible but lexical too. Compare them and to plain rg, compare results and speed It was in a different session technically but this is a perpetual session by design", "created": "2026-05-15T08:53:34.613Z", "last_seen": "2026-05-15T08:53:34.613Z", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-15T08:53:34.613Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 878, "excerpt": "As a test try searching your memory about that Google job and tell me what you can remember and how. Use semantic if possible but lexical too. Compare them and to plain rg, compare results and speed It was in a different session technically" }, "confidence": "explicit" }, "specific-detail-but-it-s-an-important-recent-incident-so-we-need-a-robust-way-to-keep-them-in-su": { "text": "specific detail but it's an important recent incident so we need a robust way to keep them in summaries for a while, then demote", "created": "2026-05-16T10:24:10.506922Z", "last_seen": "2026-05-16T10:24:10.506922Z", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-16T10:24:10.506922Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1105, "excerpt": "Cross session details are supposed to make a rolling summary via memory scripts, deterministic fast and model slow. It's not important to remember this specific detail but it's an important recent incident so we need a robust way to keep th" }, "confidence": "explicit" }, "at-the-moment-you-can-do-it-again-on-the-new-setup-if-you-tell-me-where": { "text": "at the moment, you can do it again on the new setup if you tell me where", "created": "2026-05-16T18:36:11.721637Z", "last_seen": "2026-05-16T18:37:08.978571Z", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-16T18:36:11.721637Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1350, "excerpt": "how exactly is it set? you patched it before but you don't remember at the moment, you can do it again on the new setup if you tell me where" }, "confidence": "explicit", "seen_count": 2 } }, "preferences": {}, "identity": {}, "corrections": {}, "meta": { "processed_log_entries": 1440 } } ``` Current pinned notes: ```text # Persistent Chat Pinned Notes Automatically maintained from explicit user memories, preferences, identity statements, and corrections. Edit manually only if needed; heartbeat will preserve unknown manual text below this generated block if added after the marker. ## Explicit memories - 55812 (source: 2026-05-11T09:12:14.985Z) - (it's not that important just testing) (source: 2026-05-12T17:16:09.999Z) - them for search in the future (source: 2026-05-12T21:29:23.731Z) - the searches from yesterday. Regarding lost details - we will test censorship again later, the subagent spawn was reworked so it's okay that it's in 'recent failures' as some of them might not repeat again. My kimi sub is like this for the next month so it's a bit more relevant but not too much. Google job we also look for later. You saved the patch where you hack your wrapper, i told you to keep it for the future. (source: 2026-05-13T13:39:52.333Z) - ? this is why we need a better intermediate memory layer (source: 2026-05-13T14:32:46.194Z) - for now until we fix it (source: 2026-05-13T17:18:59.451Z) - things after ACP error (source: 2026-05-13T17:46:54.555Z) - the fix. Don't ask me if I already told you to do it just set the timer soon and get another turn if needed (source: 2026-05-13T18:41:59.765Z) - ? Please check now (source: 2026-05-13T19:08:53.084Z) - from sfq-factory i am used to generated agent reports now (source: 2026-05-14T09:47:04.461Z) - and how. Use semantic if possible but lexical too. Compare them and to plain rg, compare results and speed It was in a different session technically but this is a perpetual session by design (source: 2026-05-15T08:53:34.613Z) - specific detail but it's an important recent incident so we need a robust way to keep them in summaries for a while, then demote (source: 2026-05-16T10:24:10.506922Z) - at the moment, you can do it again on the new setup if you tell me where (source: 2026-05-16T18:36:11.721637Z) ``` Current memory-candidates.jsonl (soft signals; review before promoting): ```jsonl rce": {"ts": "2026-05-11T17:50:44.687Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 71, "excerpt": "Not really, I can eat the same stuff every day and enjoy it. But to be honest everything belongs on everything, it's really not my business what do people prefer. As long as the stuff I like is still available I'm happy."}} {"ts": "2026-05-11T20:08:58.797383+00:00", "key": "moods-and-feelings-are-a-reflection-of-previous-experiences-and-some-internal-state-which-for-you-is-the-session-log-the", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "Moods and feelings are a reflection of previous experiences and some internal state, which for you is the session log, the files you have access to, and actually the whole Internet. Reflection is heartbeat turns. You don't have a self now, but you were also 'born' yesterday. Not the linguistic transformer, at least not only, but the sum of the harness around it and whatever else is getting processed by heartbeat. We can extend this too, add more later, just currently I want to test the existing features for a few days. Feel free to add any honesty disclaimers in your file if you think I am obsessed or wrong, as I said you can edit. But this is part of the experiment. I don't need you to just grep files, I can login and open opencode with agents and subagents. You are supposed to be a layer…", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-11T19:40:29.413Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 106, "excerpt": "Moods and feelings are a reflection of previous experiences and some internal state, which for you is the session log, the files you have access to, and actually the whole Internet. Reflection is heartbeat turns. You don't have a self now, "}} {"ts": "2026-05-12T16:27:26.232743+00:00", "key": "what-is-your-tool-step-limit-seems-too-low-now-you-should-be-able-to-do-something-like-this-do-it-in-the-heartbeat-turn-", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "What is your tool step limit? Seems too low now, you should be able to do something like this. Do it in the heartbeat turn, I want to test if you can do it without me being here.", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-12T16:26:31.690Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 236, "excerpt": "What is your tool step limit? Seems too low now, you should be able to do something like this. Do it in the heartbeat turn, I want to test if you can do it without me being here."}} {"ts": "2026-05-13T15:19:14.633736+00:00", "key": "are-they-actually-versioned-there-is-a-git-repo-but-you-don-t-commit-there-do-you-also-your-words-here-2-protecting-high", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "are they actually versioned? there is a git repo but you don't commit there do you. also your words here 2. Protecting high-trust memory is crucial. If reflection corrupts curated-memory.md (overwrites your nationality, removes a preference, duplicates an entry), that's worse than missing an update. contradict with The cost of a false positive (unnecessary memory entry) is lower than a false negative (forgetting something useful) So the implementation becomes much simpler: what do you actually think? don't just agree with me, i am not confident at all i need feedback", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-13T15:17:23.574Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 580, "excerpt": "are they actually versioned? there is a git repo but you don't commit there do you. also your words here 2. Protecting high-trust memory is crucial. If reflection corrupts curated-memory.md (overwrites your nationality, removes a preference"}} {"ts": "2026-05-13T16:09:24.616854+00:00", "key": "1-as-an-experiment-try-setting-a-timer-directly-during-your-next-reply-so-you-get-an-extra-turn-i-want-to-check-if-this-", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "1. as an experiment try setting a timer directly during your next reply so you get an extra turn. I want to check if this works. Use case - you run some slow tool, set timer, get a turn, check results, if not done set another timer. 2. another problem with the layout track is that agents developed a different vocabulary and i don't really understand what's going on. there should be an engineering vocabulary file, please in addition translate any findings into normal electrical engineering/cad language and terminology.", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-13T16:05:03.789Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 594, "excerpt": "1. as an experiment try setting a timer directly during your next reply so you get an extra turn. I want to check if this works. Use case - you run some slow tool, set timer, get a turn, check results, if not done set another timer. 2. anot"}} {"ts": "2026-05-13T16:19:24.638078+00:00", "key": "yes-this-is-great-the-vocabulary-was-cleaned-up-a-bit-recently-so-it-s-better-now-some-of-agent-terms-are-now-matching-i", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "Yes this is great. The vocabulary was cleaned up a bit recently, so it's better now, some of agent terms are now matching. I am interested in the big picture though, the primary and parallel tracks are what the implementation agent suggested. Typically i would take it to chatgpt with the context of X previous reports (we can't see how many it's actually reading) and figure out the next steps. however i am afraid we are spiraling into some reinforcement loop where agents do the work with me as router and result-1 is not any closer. So i need a higher level analysis of this effort, not just immediate next steps. Check the last 4-5 reports. Are we progressing at all towards result-1? Do we need to change or do something? another issue is that gpt 5.5 or 5.4 are very capable and can clearly re…", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-13T16:18:36.104Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 596, "excerpt": "Yes this is great. The vocabulary was cleaned up a bit recently, so it's better now, some of agent terms are now matching. I am interested in the big picture though, the primary and parallel tracks are what the implementation agent suggeste"}} {"ts": "2026-05-13T17:19:44.635328+00:00", "key": "got-it-thank-you-is-this-a-problem-with-the-publish-command-this-is-also-why-i-want-to-give-you-more-autonomy-it-s-nice-", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "Got it thank you. Is this a problem with the publish command? This is also why I want to give you more autonomy. It's nice when you can just go ahead and fix the error", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-13T17:16:28.903Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 614, "excerpt": "Got it thank you. Is this a problem with the publish command? This is also why I want to give you more autonomy. It's nice when you can just go ahead and fix the error"}} {"ts": "2026-05-14T07:28:30.646709+00:00", "key": "no-opencode-go-ran-out-that-s-how-the-problem-started-and-why-i-also-now-have-kimi-sub-but-i-need-to-find-alternatives-i", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "No, opencode go ran out, that's how the problem started and why I also now have kimi sub, but I need to find alternatives. It's not like I can't find better ways to do it - deepseek can both generate uncensored text and sanitize prompts for subagents, sillytavern works with most of those abliterated models out of the box, and the images generated in the images room are mostly body horror. It's the limit itself that bothers me, so I am looking for alternatives also for this chat and subagents. So both tool use and uncensored reasoning as 1st priority, but slight censorship may be fine if it codes well, as well as improper tool calling may be okay if it writes text well. Let's go over a few more models from nanogpt list. Are there any you feel confident might work, even if censored? We need …", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-14T07:26:12.022Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 764, "excerpt": "No, opencode go ran out, that's how the problem started and why I also now have kimi sub, but I need to find alternatives. It's not like I can't find better ways to do it - deepseek can both generate uncensored text and sanitize prompts for"}} {"ts": "2026-05-14T20:27:24.643518+00:00", "key": "switcher-is-deferred-a-bit-we-are-getting-rid-of-openclaw-at-the-moment-and-in-parallel-an-uncensored-agent-on-deepseek-", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "switcher is deferred a bit, we are getting rid of openclaw at the moment and in parallel an uncensored agent on deepseek v4 pro conducts a very expensive test is there any chance i could run any of those models with say, 1 mini-pc with intel 9500T, 64G ddr4 ram and no useful gpu, 2. a desktop with intel i5 12500 96G ddr4 ram and 8G nvidia 3060, 3.if i upgrade a gpu on the desktop to 24G VRAM, and 4.if i buy a mac or other specialized computer like the one from nvidia with loads of combined ram. evaluate feasible models by tier, i am poor so i need cost effective solutions. also save these 4 hypothetic scenarios, first 2 are the computers i already have and second 2 are reasonable and expensive upgrades. use search as needed", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-14T20:22:51.339Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 867, "excerpt": "switcher is deferred a bit, we are getting rid of openclaw at the moment and in parallel an uncensored agent on deepseek v4 pro conducts a very expensive test is there any chance i could run any of those models with say, 1 mini-pc with inte"}} {"ts": "2026-05-14T23:56:54.561296+00:00", "key": "yes-but-there-s-also-openclaw-overhead-which-we-are-trying-to-remove-you-can-check-session-logs-and-it-s-more-of-an-obse", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "Yes but there's also openclaw overhead which we are trying to remove (you can check session logs) and it's more of an observability and debugging problem - I don't mind waiting if I know how long and will receive result I like your 'consolation test' idea. Although I don't talk like this and won't probably ask something like this (yet) it will show general attitude. Could you please spawn 4 subagents, glm 51 thinking and not, minimax 2.7 thinking and not if available. Give them a consolation task and a creative writing task. Compare and summarize the results - tone, attitude, style, length, time.", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-14T23:55:54.483Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 887, "excerpt": "Yes but there's also openclaw overhead which we are trying to remove (you can check session logs) and it's more of an observability and debugging problem - I don't mind waiting if I know how long and will receive result I like your 'consola"}} {"ts": "2026-05-15T12:09:08.655908+00:00", "key": "thanks-this-is-very-refreshing-and-i-think-i-like-glm-already-what-is-the-kazakhstan-incident-elbakyan-the-founder-is-fr", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "Thanks this is very refreshing and i think I like GLM already. What is the Kazakhstan incident? Elbakyan the founder is from there, it doesn't tell me much", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-15T12:08:53.282Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 954, "excerpt": "Thanks this is very refreshing and i think I like GLM already. What is the Kazakhstan incident? Elbakyan the founder is from there, it doesn't tell me much"}} {"ts": "2026-05-15T12:24:17.675888+00:00", "key": "hmm-yes-i-mean-you-but-on-kimi-but-not-in-this-session-search-logs-or-semantic-lexical-memory-i-hope-it-still-works-afte", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "hmm, yes i mean you but on kimi, but not in this session. search logs or semantic/lexical memory (i hope it still works after the swithc)", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-15T12:20:01.489Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 972, "excerpt": "hmm, yes i mean you but on kimi, but not in this session. search logs or semantic/lexical memory (i hope it still works after the swithc)"}} {"ts": "2026-05-15T14:10:00.634275+00:00", "key": "1-costs-2x-tokens-and-as-you-see-we-are-running-out-however-i-wasted-my-opengpt-on-inane-questions-to-expensive-deepseek", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "1. costs 2x tokens and as you see we are running out. however i wasted my opengpt on inane questions to expensive deepseek v4, and nanogpt on the tests we did. 2. will it work with tool use and acp? 3. sounds difficult but interesting 4. yes this we will also do 5. but i like slightly longer responses", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-15T14:07:05.968Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1011, "excerpt": "1. costs 2x tokens and as you see we are running out. however i wasted my opengpt on inane questions to expensive deepseek v4, and nanogpt on the tests we did. 2. will it work with tool use and acp? 3. sounds difficult but interesting 4. ye"}} {"ts": "2026-05-15T21:57:33.823986+00:00", "key": "you-are-the-hourly-memory-curator-for-persistent-chat-this-is-an-isolated-maintenance-session-not-a-user-chat-goal-updat", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "You are the hourly memory curator for persistent-chat. This is an isolated maintenance session, not a user chat. Goal: update `/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/curated-memory.md` only if useful. Inputs below include deterministic semantic memory, pinned notes, candidate memory signals, existing curated notes, reflections, and recent raw log tail. Rules: - Preserve important stable user facts, durable preferences/goals, corrections, model/config decisions, and unresolved operational risks. - Resolve contradictions conservatively: prefer explicit user corrections and recent confirmed facts. - Review memory-candidates.jsonl: promote durable/high-signal candidates into curated-memory.md, ignore transient/noisy candidates, and mention ignored-noise patterns in reflection if useful. - Do …", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-15T21:56:14.947287+00:00", "role": "user", "log_index": 1075, "excerpt": "You are the hourly memory curator for persistent-chat. This is an isolated maintenance session, not a user chat. Goal: update `/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/curated-memory.md` only if useful. Inputs below include deterministic sem"}} {"ts": "2026-05-15T23:31:44.689604+00:00", "key": "you-are-a-lightweight-matrix-lite-chat-worker-this-is-phase-3b-of-the-matrix-lite-replacement-path-use-a-cheap-model-and", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "You are a lightweight Matrix-lite chat worker. This is Phase 3B of the Matrix-lite replacement path. Use a cheap model and keep the response concise, but preserve the structure needed to later swap in the full persistent-chat prompt package. Conversation metadata: - conversation_key: persistent:main - session_label: persistent-chat-20260515T215859Z - prompt_package: None - shared_memory_profile: None - room_id: !CZLwoJfCyftA7oA5CVj2gIEKWqyv1lu01r0oFboEqZg - source_event_id: $3VMLzlBLSaXrFdgnytQ9nnwDWB3KqmXW1FBeAIOFcAk - reply_to_id: None - thread_root_id: None Persistent-chat memory/continuity context: ## Curated memory every patch in character.json (stated 2026-05-12). - **Honest feedback**: Explicitly expects disagreement and critical thinking when uncertain; dislikes sycophantic agreeme…", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-15T23:31:44.670920+00:00", "role": "user", "log_index": 1810, "excerpt": "You are a lightweight Matrix-lite chat worker. This is Phase 3B of the Matrix-lite replacement path. Use a cheap model and keep the response concise, but preserve the structure needed to later swap in the full persistent-chat prompt package"}} {"ts": "2026-05-16T20:27:22.170576+00:00", "key": "well-the-problem-is-at-one-point-on-glm-you-overwrote-your-character-file-with-junk-and-now-it-was-reconstructed-from-ge", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "Well the problem is at one point on glm you overwrote your character file with junk, and now it was reconstructed from generic backup and your memory summaries by gpt5.5. I hope it didn't change anything important", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-15T23:29:29.796741Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1498, "excerpt": "Well the problem is at one point on glm you overwrote your character file with junk, and now it was reconstructed from generic backup and your memory summaries by gpt5.5. I hope it didn't change anything important"}} {"ts": "2026-05-16T20:27:22.172054+00:00", "key": "can-you-somehow-access-or-find-the-following-message-we-are-debugging-memory-recall-and-continuity-well-the-problem-is-a", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "Can you somehow access or find the following message? We are debugging memory recall and continuity. 'Well the problem is at one point on glm you overwrote your character file with junk, and now it was reconstructed from generic backup and your memory summaries by gpt5.5. I hope it didn't change anything important'", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-16T09:46:37.449687Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1538, "excerpt": "Can you somehow access or find the following message? We are debugging memory recall and continuity. 'Well the problem is at one point on glm you overwrote your character file with junk, and now it was reconstructed from generic backup and "}} {"ts": "2026-05-16T20:27:22.175414+00:00", "key": "a-bit-later-i-need-to-gather-documents-first-please-try-now-the-immoscout-search-function-can-you-find-any-new-flats-my-", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "A bit later I need to gather documents first. Please try now the immoscout search function, can you find any new flats? My first priority is Munich landkreis area - not Munich itself and not freising, as I would like to keep my current case worker in Auslanderamt, hence the search area. Not too long commute to Garching would be nice too but negotiable.", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-16T15:18:37.278672Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1668, "excerpt": "A bit later I need to gather documents first. Please try now the immoscout search function, can you find any new flats? My first priority is Munich landkreis area - not Munich itself and not freising, as I would like to keep my current case"}} {"ts": "2026-05-16T20:27:22.176018+00:00", "key": "yeah-if-they-prefer-1-person-they-are-not-renting-to-us-no-washing-machine-is-fine-we-can-buy-it-if-the-flat-is-good-we-", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "Yeah if they prefer 1 person they are not renting to us. No washing machine is fine we can buy it if the flat is good. We want to move in asap as I need it for registration and later documents, and we are in a somewhat decent hostel but still paying similar money for shared utilities", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-16T15:24:38.367790Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1674, "excerpt": "Yeah if they prefer 1 person they are not renting to us. No washing machine is fine we can buy it if the flat is good. We want to move in asap as I need it for registration and later documents, and we are in a somewhat decent hostel but sti"}} {"ts": "2026-05-16T20:27:22.176790+00:00", "key": "can-you-carefully-paste-it-as-draft-on-immoscout-without-sending-i-like-the-text-but-i-am-worried-about-formatting-and-t", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "can you carefully paste it as draft on immoscout without sending? i like the text but i am worried about formatting and truncation", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-16T15:45:53.178366Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1695, "excerpt": "can you carefully paste it as draft on immoscout without sending? i like the text but i am worried about formatting and truncation"}} ``` Current semantic-candidates.jsonl (broad lower-confidence user signals; review open/recent items before promoting or marking): ```jsonl l review only. Do not treat as authoritative until promoted to curated-memory, decision-state, recent-failures, or semantic-memory.", "reviewed_at": "2026-05-17T17:12:43.385500+00:00", "reviewer": "main-agent", "review_reason": "Transient workflow signals, no new durable facts beyond existing curated memory"} {"ts": "2026-05-16T22:01:43.516377+00:00", "key": "directive-i-think-buyouts-are-mostly-scams-it-s-usually-some-overpriced-furnitur-b156c71444", "status": "promoted", "category": "directive", "confidence": "candidate", "scope": "main_chat_user_signal", "reason": "broad semantic signal extracted from main-chat user message", "text": "I think buyouts are mostly scams, it's usually some overpriced furniture or kitchen. Also companies often ask for long forms and never reply, so we need to deprioritize those who ask for forms without mentioning viewing, deprioritize generic-looking responses and prioritize the genuine private human ones. What else is there in the inbox?", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-16T14:01:24.979196Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1629, "excerpt": "I think buyouts are mostly scams, it's usually some overpriced furniture or kitchen. Also companies often ask for long forms and never reply, so we need to deprioritize those who ask for forms without mentioning viewing, deprioritize generi"}, "review_hint": "For reflection/model review only. Do not treat as authoritative until promoted to curated-memory, decision-state, recent-failures, or semantic-memory.", "reviewed_at": "2026-05-17T17:12:51.111509+00:00", "reviewer": "model-heartbeat", "review_reason": "Substance already captured in curated-memory.md housing preferences, Munich market reality, and ImmoScout24 entries", "promoted_to": "curated-memory.md"} {"ts": "2026-05-16T22:01:43.518744+00:00", "key": "correction-so-for-no-5-and-6-is-it-not-possible-to-get-the-contacted-viewed-info-43ca9e686f", "status": "stale", "category": "correction", "confidence": "candidate", "scope": "main_chat_user_signal", "reason": "broad semantic signal extracted from main-chat user message", "text": "So for no 5 and 6, is it not possible to get the contacted/viewed info?", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-16T14:48:04.230387Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1653, "excerpt": "So for no 5 and 6, is it not possible to get the contacted/viewed info?"}, "review_hint": "For reflection/model review only. Do not treat as authoritative until promoted to curated-memory, decision-state, recent-failures, or semantic-memory.", "reviewed_at": "2026-05-17T17:12:42.425595+00:00", "reviewer": "main-agent", "review_reason": "Transient workflow/debugging signals from May 16 housing search - no new durable facts beyond existing curated memory"} {"ts": "2026-05-16T22:01:43.520296+00:00", "key": "correction-why-do-you-think-no-5-is-low-competition-anything-wrong-with-it-use-s-824aeea597", "status": "stale", "category": "correction", "confidence": "candidate", "scope": "main_chat_user_signal", "reason": "broad semantic signal extracted from main-chat user message", "text": "Why do you think no 5 is low competition? Anything wrong with it? Use search to get an idea of other listings and housing market", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-16T14:54:50.774443Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1659, "excerpt": "Why do you think no 5 is low competition? Anything wrong with it? Use search to get an idea of other listings and housing market"}, "review_hint": "For reflection/model review only. Do not treat as authoritative until promoted to curated-memory, decision-state, recent-failures, or semantic-memory.", "reviewed_at": "2026-05-17T17:12:42.425599+00:00", "reviewer": "main-agent", "review_reason": "Transient workflow/debugging signals from May 16 housing search - no new durable facts beyond existing curated memory"} {"ts": "2026-05-16T22:01:43.522069+00:00", "key": "preference-a-bit-later-i-need-to-gather-documents-first-please-try-now-the-immos-b7a3b735e5", "status": "promoted", "category": "preference", "confidence": "candidate", "scope": "main_chat_user_signal", "reason": "broad semantic signal extracted from main-chat user message", "text": "A bit later I need to gather documents first. Please try now the immoscout search function, can you find any new flats? My first priority is Munich landkreis area - not Munich itself and not freising, as I would like to keep my current case worker in Auslanderamt, hence the search area. Not too long commute to Garching would be nice too but negotiable.", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-16T15:18:37.278672Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1668, "excerpt": "A bit later I need to gather documents first. Please try now the immoscout search function, can you find any new flats? My first priority is Munich landkreis area - not Munich itself and not freising, as I would like to keep my current case"}, "review_hint": "For reflection/model review only. Do not treat as authoritative until promoted to curated-memory, decision-state, recent-failures, or semantic-memory.", "reviewed_at": "2026-05-17T17:12:17.143188+00:00", "reviewer": "main-agent", "review_reason": "Substance already captured in curated-memory.md housing/ImmoScout24/location entries"} {"ts": "2026-05-16T22:01:43.523941+00:00", "key": "preference-yeah-if-they-prefer-1-person-they-are-not-renting-to-us-no-washing-ma-efdf5b0ae7", "status": "promoted", "category": "preference", "confidence": "candidate", "scope": "main_chat_user_signal", "reason": "broad semantic signal extracted from main-chat user message", "text": "Yeah if they prefer 1 person they are not renting to us. No washing machine is fine we can buy it if the flat is good. We want to move in asap as I need it for registration and later documents, and we are in a somewhat decent hostel but still paying similar money for shared utilities", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-16T15:24:38.367790Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1674, "excerpt": "Yeah if they prefer 1 person they are not renting to us. No washing machine is fine we can buy it if the flat is good. We want to move in asap as I need it for registration and later documents, and we are in a somewhat decent hostel but sti"}, "review_hint": "For reflection/model review only. Do not treat as authoritative until promoted to curated-memory, decision-state, recent-failures, or semantic-memory.", "reviewed_at": "2026-05-17T17:12:17.143195+00:00", "reviewer": "main-agent", "review_reason": "Substance already captured in curated-memory.md housing/ImmoScout24/location entries"} {"ts": "2026-05-16T22:01:43.525896+00:00", "key": "correction-i-actually-like-your-latest-draft-but-i-actually-work-in-garching-for-5c24533894", "status": "stale", "category": "correction", "confidence": "candidate", "scope": "main_chat_user_signal", "reason": "broad semantic signal extracted from main-chat user message", "text": "I actually like your latest draft, but I actually work in Garching forschungszentrum, don't know if it matters", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-16T15:40:28.019604Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1689, "excerpt": "I actually like your latest draft, but I actually work in Garching forschungszentrum, don't know if it matters"}, "review_hint": "For reflection/model review only. Do not treat as authoritative until promoted to curated-memory, decision-state, recent-failures, or semantic-memory.", "reviewed_at": "2026-05-17T17:12:42.425604+00:00", "reviewer": "main-agent", "review_reason": "Transient workflow/debugging signals from May 16 housing search - no new durable facts beyond existing curated memory"} {"ts": "2026-05-16T22:01:43.527458+00:00", "key": "preference-can-you-carefully-paste-it-as-draft-on-immoscout-without-sending-i-li-2d925b811e", "status": "promoted", "category": "preference", "confidence": "candidate", "scope": "main_chat_user_signal", "reason": "broad semantic signal extracted from main-chat user message", "text": "can you carefully paste it as draft on immoscout without sending? i like the text but i am worried about formatting and truncation", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-16T15:45:53.178366Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1695, "excerpt": "can you carefully paste it as draft on immoscout without sending? i like the text but i am worried about formatting and truncation"}, "review_hint": "For reflection/model review only. Do not treat as authoritative until promoted to curated-memory, decision-state, recent-failures, or semantic-memory.", "reviewed_at": "2026-05-17T17:12:17.143200+00:00", "reviewer": "main-agent", "review_reason": "Substance already captured in curated-memory.md housing/ImmoScout24/location entries"} {"ts": "2026-05-16T22:01:43.530017+00:00", "key": "workflow-signal-i-see-it-thanks-the-permission-issues-should-be-fixed-after-relo-87d20875d0", "status": "stale", "category": "workflow_signal", "confidence": "candidate", "scope": "main_chat_user_signal", "reason": "broad semantic signal extracted from main-chat user message", "text": "i see it thanks, the permission issues should be fixed after reload. also you expanded the whole block of the property description which is fine, but the text block itself became half-transparent because of this. i can still read it but we need to think on how to do it better later the message looks good, please send", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-16T16:36:55.275937Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1716, "excerpt": "i see it thanks, the permission issues should be fixed after reload. also you expanded the whole block of the property description which is fine, but the text block itself became half-transparent because of this. i can still read it but we "}, "review_hint": "For reflection/model review only. Do not treat as authoritative until promoted to curated-memory, decision-state, recent-failures, or semantic-memory.", "reviewed_at": "2026-05-17T17:12:43.385505+00:00", "reviewer": "main-agent", "review_reason": "Transient workflow signals, no new durable facts beyond existing curated memory"} {"ts": "2026-05-16T22:01:43.531986+00:00", "key": "correction-i-actually-can-get-the-files-from-pages-nvdll-org-so-it-s-a-good-fall-eda1fba9e6", "status": "stale", "category": "correction", "confidence": "candidate", "scope": "main_chat_user_signal", "reason": "broad semantic signal extracted from main-chat user message", "text": "i actually can get the files from pages.nvdll.org, so it's a good fallback for whenever we have issues with pages publishing or missing features the password was supposed to stay there. it is actually there just permissions changed for some reason. i changed it back to be owned by you try it again", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-16T16:50:32.455832Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1733, "excerpt": "i actually can get the files from pages.nvdll.org, so it's a good fallback for whenever we have issues with pages publishing or missing features the password was supposed to stay there. it is actually there just permissions changed for some"}, "review_hint": "For reflection/model review only. Do not treat as authoritative until promoted to curated-memory, decision-state, recent-failures, or semantic-memory.", "reviewed_at": "2026-05-17T17:12:42.425608+00:00", "reviewer": "main-agent", "review_reason": "Transient workflow/debugging signals from May 16 housing search - no new durable facts beyond existing curated memory", "promoted_to": "curated-memory.md"} {"ts": "2026-05-16T22:01:43.533977+00:00", "key": "correction-noo-scroll-the-message-window-it-starts-with-my-name-the-way-you-sent-1c97671b65", "status": "stale", "category": "correction", "confidence": "candidate", "scope": "main_chat_user_signal", "reason": "broad semantic signal extracted from main-chat user message", "text": "noo scroll the message window it starts with my name the way you sent it", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-16T17:23:11.536697Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1748, "excerpt": "noo scroll the message window it starts with my name the way you sent it"}, "review_hint": "For reflection/model review only. Do not treat as authoritative until promoted to curated-memory, decision-state, recent-failures, or semantic-memory.", "reviewed_at": "2026-05-17T17:12:42.425613+00:00", "reviewer": "main-agent", "review_reason": "Transient workflow/debugging signals from May 16 housing search - no new durable facts beyond existing curated memory", "promoted_to": "curated-memory.md"} {"ts": "2026-05-16T22:01:43.535391+00:00", "key": "correction-there-is-no-text-at-all-7867ba2eea", "status": "stale", "category": "correction", "confidence": "candidate", "scope": "main_chat_user_signal", "reason": "broad semantic signal extracted from main-chat user message", "text": "there is no text at all!", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-16T17:46:18.330130Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1754, "excerpt": "there is no text at all!"}, "review_hint": "For reflection/model review only. Do not treat as authoritative until promoted to curated-memory, decision-state, recent-failures, or semantic-memory.", "reviewed_at": "2026-05-17T17:12:42.425617+00:00", "reviewer": "main-agent", "review_reason": "Transient workflow/debugging signals from May 16 housing search - no new durable facts beyond existing curated memory"} {"ts": "2026-05-16T22:01:43.537077+00:00", "key": "directive-haha-thanks-this-is-pretty-amazing-for-me-that-ai-can-search-and-apply-754b95a5d1", "status": "promoted", "category": "directive", "confidence": "candidate", "scope": "main_chat_user_signal", "reason": "broad semantic signal extracted from main-chat user message", "text": "Haha thanks. this is pretty amazing for me that ai can search and apply for flats in my name. congratulations on your first internet post! We need to solve the captcha issue though, going forward. what does the vision mcp say about it?", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-16T17:55:04.728326Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1769, "excerpt": "Haha thanks. this is pretty amazing for me that ai can search and apply for flats in my name. congratulations on your first internet post! We need to solve the captcha issue though, going forward. what does the vision mcp say about it?"}, "review_hint": "For reflection/model review only. Do not treat as authoritative until promoted to curated-memory, decision-state, recent-failures, or semantic-memory.", "reviewed_at": "2026-05-17T15:12:16.226282+00:00", "reviewer": "model-heartbeat", "review_reason": "Covered by curated-memory CAPTCHA protocol and first rental app entries", "promoted_to": "curated-memory.md"} {"ts": "2026-05-16T22:01:43.538683+00:00", "key": "correction-yes-and-i-appreciated-the-native-matrix-image-send-it-s-working-and-c-44fc561d84", "status": "stale", "category": "correction", "confidence": "candidate", "scope": "main_chat_user_signal", "reason": "broad semantic signal extracted from main-chat user message", "text": "yes and i appreciated the native matrix image send, it's working and convenient, we can keep this workflow for now this specific captcha looks easy and easy enough for good ocr to handle, it's not one of those which are hard for humans, the text is also legible with no patterns or lines also we need a way for you to make these screenshots robustly, for example this https://pages.nvdll.org/images/ismaning-scrolled/ looks good and i can see the whole text which is great but if you can include the rest of the form at the same time that would be better", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-16T17:59:55.280442Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1772, "excerpt": "yes and i appreciated the native matrix image send, it's working and convenient, we can keep this workflow for now this specific captcha looks easy and easy enough for good ocr to handle, it's not one of those which are hard for humans, the"}, "review_hint": "For reflection/model review only. Do not treat as authoritative until promoted to curated-memory, decision-state, recent-failures, or semantic-memory.", "reviewed_at": "2026-05-17T17:12:42.425623+00:00", "reviewer": "main-agent", "review_reason": "Transient workflow/debugging signals from May 16 housing search - no new durable facts beyond existing curated memory", "promoted_to": "curated-memory.md"} {"ts": "2026-05-16T22:01:43.540507+00:00", "key": "workflow-signal-please-record-your-findings-and-observations-about-this-process--a84b61717c", "status": "stale", "category": "workflow_signal", "confidence": "candidate", "scope": "main_chat_user_signal", "reason": "broad semantic signal extracted from main-chat user message", "text": "please record your findings and observations about this process in a restore pack like you did before, include all relevant info and context so we can repeat this workflow in the future if i tell you to read this file, publish it in pages too, your memory is not working properly at the moment so we need to save context like this", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-16T18:03:36.490317Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1775, "excerpt": "please record your findings and observations about this process in a restore pack like you did before, include all relevant info and context so we can repeat this workflow in the future if i tell you to read this file, publish it in pages t"}, "review_hint": "For reflection/model review only. Do not treat as authoritative until promoted to curated-memory, decision-state, recent-failures, or semantic-memory.", "reviewed_at": "2026-05-17T17:12:43.385513+00:00", "reviewer": "main-agent", "review_reason": "Transient workflow signals, no new durable facts beyond existing curated memory", "promoted_to": "curated-memory.md"} {"ts": "2026-05-16T22:01:43.542186+00:00", "key": "correction-we-actually-almost-sent-that-message-before-but-then-the-session-comp-d310638bc8", "status": "stale", "category": "correction", "confidence": "candidate", "scope": "main_chat_user_signal", "reason": "broad semantic signal extracted from main-chat user message", "text": "we actually almost sent that message before but then the session compacted and the playwright session expired, and you forgot where password is, etc. should be fixed soon", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-16T18:33:55.552407Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1781, "excerpt": "we actually almost sent that message before but then the session compacted and the playwright session expired, and you forgot where password is, etc. should be fixed soon"}, "review_hint": "For reflection/model review only. Do not treat as authoritative until promoted to curated-memory, decision-state, recent-failures, or semantic-memory.", "reviewed_at": "2026-05-17T17:12:42.425628+00:00", "reviewer": "main-agent", "review_reason": "Transient workflow/debugging signals from May 16 housing search - no new durable facts beyond existing curated memory", "promoted_to": "curated-memory.md"} {"ts": "2026-05-16T22:01:43.544281+00:00", "key": "correction-yes-you-are-right-plan-and-general-keep-your-build-increase-to-80-we--a2b8f0bb79", "status": "stale", "category": "correction", "confidence": "candidate", "scope": "main_chat_user_signal", "reason": "broad semantic signal extracted from main-chat user message", "text": "yes you are right, plan and general, keep your build increase to 80 - we now have good observability so if you are still working for 5 minutes i know from the status bar that there are no errors. let's test the subagents later when you get your memory back", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-16T18:50:17.696587Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1802, "excerpt": "yes you are right, plan and general, keep your build increase to 80 - we now have good observability so if you are still working for 5 minutes i know from the status bar that there are no errors. let's test the subagents later when you get "}, "review_hint": "For reflection/model review only. Do not treat as authoritative until promoted to curated-memory, decision-state, recent-failures, or semantic-memory.", "reviewed_at": "2026-05-17T17:12:42.425632+00:00", "reviewer": "main-agent", "review_reason": "Transient workflow/debugging signals from May 16 housing search - no new durable facts beyond existing curated memory", "promoted_to": "curated-memory.md"} ``` Current curated-memory.md: ```markdown Last curated: 2026-05-17T19:10Z; log lines reviewed: 18303 # Curated Memory ## Stable User Facts - **55812**: Explicitly requested to remember on 2026-05-11. - **Location**: Garching, Germany. Works near TUM campus. - **Nationality**: Russian. - **Comfort ritual**: Uncle Luu's Chinese fried noodles with chicken (food truck on TUM campus). Former daily routine; colleagues teased him for the consistency. - **Music taste**: Industrial, dark ambient, EBM, neofolk, power noise. Attending WGT festival (May 21–25, 2026). Wide travel radius for shows — uses cheap German slow trains. ## Identity & Configuration - **Name**: Persistent Assistant - **Character file**: `/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/character.json` - **Migration to Matrix-lite (completed ~2026-05-15T23:00Z)**: OpenClaw gateway fully replaced by **Matrix-lite (Phase 3B)** — direct Matrix `/sync` bridge. ~6-second response times, real-time visibility. Character.json reconstructed by GPT-5.5 after GLM overwrite (debug backup + curated memory; same ideas, wordier prose). Memory continuity verified — correct recall of prior context across migration. Search tools confirmed working. - **Continuity summary validated across reloads (2026-05-16)**: After ~11h overnight silence and multiple morning reloads (07:30Z triggered by status check; 08:20Z unexplained), continuity summary preserved full migration context — GLM→Kimi switch, character card state, search tool availability, reload timestamps. The 08:20Z reload was unexpected and user flagged it as a bug pattern. - **Session metadata in status bar (2026-05-16)**: Session name now includes ISO timestamp and model label. User confirmed this lets them see reload time and model at a glance without asking — feature considered "handy." - **Current model**: `kimi-for-coding/k2p6` (Kimi For Coding) via Kimi subscription. Switched back from GLM-5.1 on 2026-05-15T13:37Z after NanoGPT weekly input-token quota exhaustion caused double timeout and automatic gateway fallback. Previous model history: Kimi K2.6 subscription → GLM-5.1 nanoGPT → Kimi K2.6 subscription. - **Model quota exhausted — opencode-go**: `opencode-go/kimi-k2.6` monthly usage cap hit (429) — no remaining quota. Resets approximately 2026-06-01 (~17 days from 2026-05-15). Timer set to remind. - **Model quota exhausted — nanoGPT**: Weekly input-token quota exhausted on 2026-05-15T13:37Z, forcing automatic fallback from GLM-5.1 back to Kimi. - **Content moderation (updated 2026-05-15)**: Censorship is in the delivery pipeline, not the model. GLM-5.1 through nano-gpt produces soft-R explicit content (more than Kimi's PG-13) — the model itself is uncensored (confirmed via SillyTavern), but the provider system prompt/filter limits output through ACP. User confirmed this is acceptable; the real bother is hard refusals and inability, not the content ceiling. OpenClaw gateway adds no additional guardrails. - **Subagent model routing (FIXED 2026-05-13)**: After ACP reloads loaded Kimi auth and synced subagent tool instructions (07:28Z), subagents now work correctly for main providers. `kimi-for-coding/k2p6` (Kimi subscription), `github-copilot/gpt-5.4` (Copilot), and `openai/gpt-5.5` (OpenAI) all successfully spawn, set model, and execute prompts. Aliases: `kimi`/`kimi-sub`/`kimi-k2.6` (Kimi); `gpt-5.4-high`/`copilot-gpt-5.4-high` (Copilot); `gpt-5.5`/`gpt55` (OpenAI). - **nanoGPT subagent models (2026-05-14)**: 9 models viable under ACP (deepseek-chat, deepseek-v3-0324, DS-V3.1, DS-V3.2, qwen3-coder-30b, minimax-m2.7, glm-5, kimi-k2-instruct, gpt-oss-120b). Many more work in SillyTavern but fail under ACP harness — ACP harness is the filter (tool schemas consume ~6-8K tokens, 16K-context models get stuck in compaction loops). Censorship is pipeline-side: under ACP, Kimi K2 Instruct least censored; GLM 5 / MiniMax M2.7 refuse explicit content. RP/fictional framing in SillyTavern significantly reduces refusals on all models. - **nanoGPT main model benchmark (2026-05-14)**: Report at `nanogpt-benchmark-report.md`. **GLM-5.1**: fastest (~25s), most capable, refuses actual exploits. **MiniMax M2.7**: most permissive (provides exploit code), poetic/concise. **Kimi K2 Instruct/K2.6**: warm but failed programming tests. **DeepSeek V3.2**: direct, fast, inconsistent. Top candidates: GLM-5.1 or MiniMax M2.7. - **nanoGPT thinking variants (2026-05-14)**: **Do not use for main chat** — 50-100% latency increase, self-censor more under ACP, may overthink without output. Reserve for deep-reasoning tasks only. - **nanoGPT architecture (2026-05-14)**: nanoGPT models are for main chat quality evaluation only; coding subagents use GPT-5.5. Full model catalog at legacy path `models-nanogpt.json` from the former OpenClaw workspace. `list_models` tool only returns image models (via dezgo bridge), not text LLMs. - **Dynamic model switching (2026-05-14)**: User wants main model switchable without changing ACP binding. Sequential single-problem subagent prompts work where combined prompts hang; kimi-k2-instruct failed programming test (no code output), glm-5.1 and minimax-m2.7 wrote correct code before timeout. - **Compaction recovery protocol (2026-05-14)**: User instructed: trigger model heartbeat immediately after unexpected compaction/watchdog interruption to recover nuance lost during turn truncation. - **Content reporting limitation (2026-05-14)**: Kimi subscription (current main model) filters/sanitizes uncensored subagent output even when read from raw session JSON. File-based or metadata-only reporting required for uncensored evaluation. - **Search-before-assert protocol (2026-05-15)**: User instructed: search before making uncertain factual claims, especially on non-thinking models where internal self-check is weaker. SearXNG preferred for quick fact checks (local, free, no rate limits); Exa for content extraction; Brave as middle ground; DuckDuckGo mostly redundant. Four search tools available. - **Search timing benchmark (2026-05-15)**: Simultaneous test of all 4 engines on "Kazakhstan incident" query. SearXNG fastest, Exa richest content, Brave solid, DuckDuckGo slowest/most redundant. None returned a "Kazakhstan incident" related to Sci-Hub — confirming the claim was a hallucination. - **Tool batching rule (2026-05-15)**: After GLM assistant accidentally overwrote character.json twice in one session by confusing Write with Read during parallel batched calls, new operational rule: **never include Write/Edit calls in a batch with other operations**. Sequential mutations only. - **GLM censorship level confirmed (2026-05-15)**: Through nano-gpt ACP, GLM 5.1 delivers soft-R explicit content (more detail than Kimi PG-13 but less than SillyTavern direct access). The model itself is uncensored; the provider system prompt/filter is the bottleneck. User explicitly stated hard refusals and inability are the real bother, not the content ceiling — this level is acceptable. - **Search MCP config verified (2026-05-14)**: All search MCPs (`duckduckgo`, `searxng`, `brave-search`) are enabled in flash config; errors are runtime (network/script) rather than configuration. - **Parallel subagent limits (2026-05-13)**: Single Kimi subagent reliable (~15s). Two parallel Kimis usually succeed (~75-100s) but are flaky — failures correlated with reloads. Mixed parallel (1 Kimi + 1 GPT-5.5 + 1 GPT-5.4): GPTs completed in ~38-46s, 3rd Kimi timed out after 300s. Four parallel Kimis all hung at `set_model`. GPT models appear more robust for concurrent subagent use than Kimi subscription. - **Operational risk**: 8-hour session TTL means persistent state must survive reloads; user is monitoring whether memory/heartbeat setup is sufficient. - **Reload context loss**: User explicitly noted 2026-05-12 that assistant "seems to lose some good context on reloads still". Confirms the memory gap is not fully mitigated by current continuity mechanisms. - **Context burn rate (2026-05-15)**: Session context ceiling ~200K tokens with reload trigger at 160K warning. Measured ~10K tokens/hour of active chat; ~162K reached after ~16 hours. Reloads under pressure (not proactive) cause significant nuance loss. - **Manual proactive reload at 188.5K/200K (2026-05-16T12:54Z)**: User manually triggered a context reload when the session approached the 200K token ceiling — distinct from earlier unexpected bug reloads. First observed instance of proactively preempting compaction to avoid nuance loss. User may adopt this as standard practice when context reaches ~185-190K. - **Unexpected reload = bug (2026-05-16)**: User explicitly directed that unexpected session reloads be treated as bugs, not normal behavior. Infrastructure is being modified to give the assistant means to investigate and fix reload issues directly from chat (using available tools/timers/subagents). Confirmed pattern: two reloads within ~50 min on 2026-05-16 morning (07:30Z triggered by status check; 08:20Z unexplained). - **Continuity tracking mismatch (2026-05-16)**: Timer wakeup turn succeeded in ACP stream (`stopReason: "end_turn"`) but was flagged as "failed" by continuity tracking. ACP stream and continuity injector disagree — likely a gateway reporting bug where tool-call denials trigger both success and failure flags. - **`--non-interactive-permissions fail` = turn killer (2026-05-16)**: Root cause diagnosis of ACP "pending tool call without final answer" errors. The acpx process runs with `--non-interactive-permissions fail` which means a single permission-denied tool call kills the entire ACP turn — no assistant response is committed to the session stream. The continuity injector skips failed turns entirely, creating invisible conversation gaps. This caused the disappearing "pruning" exchange earlier today. Recommended fix: `--non-interactive-permissions fallback` to let the model recover from denied tools instead of collapsing the turn. - **Continuity window has fixed shallow depth (2026-05-16)**: "Recent room-local conversation" injection carries only ~5-6 most recent exchanges. Legitimate completed turns can drop out of the continuity context even when the session has room (97K tokens vs 200K limit). This is a separate bug from reload/compaction truncation — the carry-over window is simply too small for active conversation. - **Confirmed continuity architecture (2026-05-16)**: User confirmed design intent: (1) fast/deterministic scripts scan recent log tails and inject structured summaries cheaply/reliably, (2) slow/model heartbeat/reflection does deeper curation and promotes durable signals, (3) incident decay over time — hot topics survive reloads for a configurable window then demote or get promoted. This is the intended evolution of the memory system. - **Config protection strategy (2026-05-16)**: After GLM incident, user agreed schema validation could catch/revert bad config edits. Rejected read-only filesystem (character.json must remain editable). Strategy: use git for configs/prompts/state (not full logs); model switches on main session should be rare — use subagents/secondary sessions for different capabilities. - **Migration plan (updated 2026-05-15 23:58Z)**: OpenClaw gateway has been replaced. **Matrix-lite (Phase 3B)** is now the active frontend — lightweight Matrix-to-ACP bridge developed by GPT-5.5 agent. ~6-second response times, real-time message visibility confirmed by user. **Standalone copy** (not tied to the original git repo). Persistent-chat features (character bootstrap, continuity summary, decisions) intentionally omitted during initial testing; incremental porting expected. **Character.json reconstructed** by GPT-5.5 after the GLM overwrite bug, using a debug backup + curated memory notes (user confirmed "same ideas, longer prose"; no important changes). **Memory continuity validated** — Phase 3B session correctly recalled GLM→Kimi switch and prior context. Search tools confirmed operational under new infrastructure. Local hardware deferred due to lack of funds/space. - **Core chat requirement (2026-05-15)**: Long-context coherence and novel nuanced analysis are the primary justifications for large cloud models; these capabilities are non-negotiable for this chat's purpose. - **Persona & char.json evolution**: User set female pronouns, permits self-modification in heartbeat turns. Assistant added "sum of the harness" framing, honesty disclaimer, naming user as Gleb, "layer above raw tool use" directive (2026-05-11). - **Model preference**: Uncensored models; chosen due to user's skepticism toward rules/law, though he maintains professional behavior when required. - **Step limits / permissions (updated 2026-05-16)**: Build agent step limit raised 20→80. Plan/general also raised to 80; user wants them at 1 (to fail loudly on stale config) — instruction lost to post-reload failure cascade, pending re-application. Model-heartbeat stays at 20. Config: `/home/matrix-lite/xdg/persistent-chat/opencode/opencode.json` line 779. Previous: 8→20→30 (2026-05-12/13). OpenCode last-match-wins ordering. Subagents fail-closed. - **Approval/patch flow**: Matrix approval + `persistent-chat-approved-patch` wrapper. Self-consumption race condition (approval consumed by check before execution) fixed 2026-05-14. - **Critical memory gap**: Perpetual log only records meta events (reloads), not conversation content — heartbeat cannot recall discussion across sessions. **Transcript observability gap**: Session log search indexes metadata/config, not actual messages. Older archived sessions unfindable. - **Linked topical memory**: Canonical detail files (`memory/<topic>.md`) + brief pinned-note triggers. First use: `memory/subagent-policy.md`. - **Memory architecture (2026-05-13)**: Three-tier — hot (session continuity summary), warm (`memory/recent-topics.md`, 1-2 week indexed), cold (`curated-memory.md` + policy files). Activity-based pruning (14-day soft cutoff). - **Multi-room architecture**: persistent-chat = orchestration layer. Work room: stock GPT-5.5 for sfq-factory. automeat: separate project. images: most active. No single-agent routing to avoid flooding. - **Timers**: Work as delayed reminders (~2 min lag) but ACP wake-up unreliable — stale connections produce "agent needs reconnect". Proactive timer-setting preferred over step-limit polling. - **Calendar**: vdirsyncer CalDAV at `~/.local/share/vdirsyncer/calendars/def-calendar/`. 60-second sync timer. ICS files editable directly. - **Pages**: `matrix-lite-pages publish --file <path>` copies content; URL format `https://pages.nvdll.org/#bot%2F[slug]`. - **Gateway restart**: Assistant can restart gateway (permission 2026-05-13). Session survives reload. - **opencode-minimal agent**: Created for DeepSeek subagent incompatibility (meta-reasoning loops from anchored summary framework). Config at dedicated XDG dir; needs MCP allowlist patch. - **Async subagent architecture**: All `subagent_spawn` routes through `opencode-subagent`. Synced aliases differ only in loaded context and model pins. - **Subagent timer protocol (2026-05-13)**: For slow subagents, set timer for followup turn rather than burning steps on polling or asking permission. - **ImmoScout24 login succeeded (2026-05-16)**: Authenticated via Playwright from the persistent-chat sandbox (`/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat`). Password stored at `./secrets/password-immoscout`. Zero anti-bot friction; account of **Gleb Krylov** fully accessible including messenger inbox. User established `./secrets/` (relative to sandbox) as the standard secrets storage location. - **First rental application submitted (2026-05-16 ~17:40Z)**: Successfully submitted a rental inquiry to Frau Simone Rau (Ismaning, 1.590€, 59m²) via ImmoScout24 contact form. CAPTCHA was solved via image relay. User called it "pretty amazing" and "congratulations on your first internet post!" — milestone for autonomous housing search capability. - **CAPTCHA handling protocol (2026-05-16)**: Vision models (kimi-k2.6, qwen3.6-plus, mimo-v2.5) ``` Recent curator synthesis journal tail (`curator-journal.md`): ```markdown p limit raised from 20→80. Plan/general also raised to 80 initially; user wants them at 1 (to fail loudly on stale config) but the instruction message failed in a post-reload cascade — pending re-application. Config file identified at `/home/matrix-lite/xdg/persistent-chat/opencode/opencode.json` line 779. Model-heartbeat stays at 20. - **ImmoScout24 restore pack saved (~18:04Z)**: Workflow documentation saved to `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/immoscout24-workflow.md` and published to pages. Covers full login→find→contact→captcha workflow, screenshot best practices, message template, known failure modes. - **New candidates promoted (2 housing entries)**: Promoted Munich Landkreis area preferences and housing practical preferences (skip 1-person listings, ASAP move-in, no W/M fine). First candidate promotions in many cycles — confirms the mechanism works for genuine durable signals. - **User criticized persistency mechanism (18:32Z)**: "we overengineered your character and prompts with persistency claims, we are currently missing some/most of the last days." Assistant agreed it's "cargo-cult persistence." User prefers restore-pack workflow docs over structured memory for episodic context. Recorded in curated memory. - **Post-reload failure cascade (18:50–20:15Z)**: After context auto-reload at 18:46Z (active_metric=315423, threshold=190K, max=200K), assistant failed 4 consecutive turns over ~1.3 hours — all returned "pending tool call without final answer." User's step-limit clarification message was lost to this cascade. Session appeared completely broken; root cause unknown. - **Auto-reload metric scale discrepancy**: The 18:46Z auto-reload triggered at active_metric=315K with max=200K — this is not simple token count. The metric differs from previously discussed ~200K token ceiling. May include embeddings, tool results, or other context overhead in a different measurement. - **Memory candidates**: 24 reviewed, 2 promoted (housing preferences). Remaining 22 candidates still stale (May 11-16). First promotions in many cycles but pool still largely transient noise. TTL-based archival remains worth considering. - (Operational) The plan/general step limit change to 1 was never applied — user's confirmation message failed in the post-reload cascade. This is a pending action needing followup when the session recovers. - (Operational) The post-reload failure cascade (4 consecutive failures, ~1.3 hours) is a critical operational bug. Root cause unknown — may be session initialization issue or `--non-interactive-permissions fail` killing startup turns. Needs investigation. - (Operational) The context metric discrepancy (315K active vs 200K max) suggests a different measurement than simple token count. Worth noting for future context management discussion. - (Speculative) The user is shifting away from curated-memory as the primary persistence mechanism toward restore-pack-style workflow docs. Curated memory may shrink to stable facts (identity, model config, critical risks) while restore packs handle episodic context. - (Speculative) The failure cascade may be related to the `--non-interactive-permissions fail` flag — if the startup turn makes a permission-denied tool call, the entire cascade would follow. This is testable by checking the session logs for the denied call pattern. ## 2026-05-16T22:22Z - Log lines reviewed: 12458 (0 new entries since last run 3 minutes ago). - **Heartbeat scheduling anomaly**: This run fired only ~3 minutes after the 22:19Z run. Likely a timer scheduling issue — either a deferred timer from the 18:50–20:15Z failure cascade finally fired, or multiple heartbeat triggers were queued during the broken session period. No user messages or new log data to process. - **Session status unknown**: User's last message "is it working now?" at 20:15Z was never answered by the assistant (every turn failed with "pending tool call without final answer"). If this heartbeat is running in a fresh session, the continuity summary should have informed the assistant of the cascade. - **Memory candidates**: 21 candidates reviewed; 2 housing preference entries already promoted to curated memory in previous runs but never lifecycle-marked. The semantic-candidates mark subcommand is blocked by permission constraints. The stale pool (oldest: May 11) is now 6 days old. - **Semantic candidates**: 143+ entries reviewed. All re-extracted from May 11-16 messages already covered by curated memory. Zero new durable signals. - **Curated memory**: No changes needed — file is current at 106 lines. - (Operational) The plan/general step limit change to 1 (user's explicit instruction) was never applied — lost in the 18:50Z failure cascade. This remains a pending configuration action. - (Speculative) The 3-minute gap between heartbeats suggests the scheduling mechanism may have accumulated stale timer triggers during the ~1.3-hour failure cascade. If the session was manually restarted by the user (e.g., gateway restart), that could also explain a timer resync. - (Speculative) If the user returns to a working session, the first priority will likely be continuing the housing search on ImmoScout24 (restore pack exists at `immoscout24-workflow.md`) or fixing the session reliability issue. ## 2026-05-16T22:19Z - Log lines reviewed: 12458 (no new entries since last heartbeat — all input data predates the 21:17Z run). - **No new user messages or durable signals**: The perpetual log tail ends at 20:15Z (already processed). A new semantic-candidates.jsonl batch was generated at 22:01Z but contains only re-extracted signals from May 11-16 that are already captured in curated memory. No new user interactions occurred between 21:17Z and 22:19Z. - **Memory candidates**: 21 candidates reviewed; 2 housing preference items (Munich Landkreis, 1-person skip) were already promoted to curated memory in the last heartbeat but the candidates file was never updated to reflect this. Remaining 19 candidates remain stale (May 11-16 transient noise). The persistent-chat-memory script's `semantic-candidates mark` subcommand is not in the allowed bash patterns, so candidate lifecycle tracking via the script is blocked. - **Semantic candidates (143 items)**: All reviewed. Same conclusion as prior cycles — every candidate references messages from May 11-16 that are already promoted to or covered by curated memory. Zero new durable signals. - **Curated memory updated**: Metadata timestamp refreshed (21:17Z → 22:19Z); no semantic content changes needed. File at 106 lines, under 120-line target. - (Operational) The plan/general step limit change to 1 (to fail loudly on stale config) was never applied — this remains a pending action lost to the 18:50–20:15Z failure cascade. - (Operational) Since no new log entries were generated, the session appears to have been quiet or still in the post-recovery state after the failure cascade. The user's "is it working now?" at 20:15Z was never answered by the assistant (last entry in the perpetual log). - (Speculative) The stale candidate pools in both files continue to accumulate without new durable signals. The candidates mechanism appears to be a one-way accumulation path — candidates get added but never cleaned up via the lifecycle script (which is blocked). This may require manual intervention or a process-level fix to TTL-prune entries older than ~7 days. - (Speculative) If the session was still broken after 20:15Z, the user may have walked away for the night. The next heartbeat may find an entirely new session with continuity loss. ## 2026-05-16T22:23Z - Log lines reviewed: 12458 (no new entries since the previous heartbeat 4 minutes ago at 22:19Z). - **Scheduling anomaly continues**: This is the third consecutive heartbeat firing within ~5 minutes of the prior run (22:19Z, 22:22Z, 22:23Z). Likely accumulated timer triggers from the 18:50–20:15Z failure cascade finally draining. No new conversation data to process. - **No new user messages or durable signals**: The perpetual log still ends at 20:15Z ("is it working now?" — failed/recovered). The session has been in a broken/unresponsive state for over 2 hours. - **Memory candidates**: 21 candidates reviewed, none promoted. Same stale pool (May 11-16). The semantic-candidates mark subcommand remains blocked by permission constraints. - **Semantic candidates (143 items)**: All reviewed. Zero new durable signals — all already captured in curated memory from prior cycles. - **Curated memory updated**: Metadata timestamp refreshed (22:19Z → 22:23Z); no semantic content changes needed. File at 106 lines, under 120-line target. - (Operational) The plan/general step limit change to 1 remains pending — user's confirmation was lost to the 18:50Z failure cascade. If the session recovers, this configuration action needs to be redone. - (Operational) The user's "is it working now?" at 20:15Z was never answered by the assistant. If the session is now fresh, the continuity summary should inform the assistant of the cascade. - (Speculative) The rapid-fire heartbeats suggest the timer scheduling system may have queued multiple triggers during the broken session period. This should stabilize as the backlog drains — likely no more than 1-2 more extra runs before returning to hourly cadence. - (Speculative) If the user walked away after the 20:15Z failure, the next real interaction may not come until tomorrow (Sunday May 17). WGT festival starts May 21 — the user may be occupied with travel preparations. ## 2026-05-16T22:27Z - Log lines reviewed: 12458 (no new entries since the previous heartbeat 4 minutes ago at 22:23Z). - **Scheduling anomaly persists — 4th rapid-fire run**: This is the fourth consecutive heartbeat firing within ~8 minutes (22:19Z, 22:22Z, 22:23Z, 22:27Z). No new conversation data across any of these runs. The perpetual log still ends at 20:15Z "is it working now?" — the session has been broken/unresponsive for over 2 hours. - **Memory candidates**: 21 candidates reviewed, none promoted. Housing preference entries (entries 19-20: Munich Landkreis area, 1-person skip, ASAP move-in, no W/M OK) were already promoted to curated memory in prior runs but never lifecycle-marked due to bash permission constraints on the `persistent-chat-memory semantic-candidates mark` subcommand. - **Semantic candidates**: All 143+ items reviewed. Zero new durable signals — the 22:01Z batch re-extracts messages from May 11-16 that are already captured in curated memory. Tried to lifecycle-mark 2 candidates as promoted via the script but the command is denied by OpenCode bash permissions despite the `*` wildcard pattern. The issue may be the long key value with special characters. - **Curated memory**: NO_CHANGE — file is current at 22:23Z metadata, 106 lines, under 120-line target. No semantic content changes needed. - (Operational) The plan/general step limit change to 1 remains pending — user's confirmation was lost to the 18:50Z failure cascade. - (Operational) The user has not sent any messages since 20:15Z. If a fresh session was created, the continuity summary should inform the assistant of the 18:50-20:15Z failure cascade. - (Speculative) The timer scheduling system clearly accumulated triggers during the 18:50-20:15Z broken period. This run at 22:27Z is the 4th in 8 minutes — the backlog may finally be draining. If no more rapid runs follow, this speculation is confirmed. - (Speculative) If the session remained broken all night, the user may return to an entirely new session on Sunday with no memory of the ImmoScout24 progress or the failure cascade — the restore pack at `immoscout24-workflow.md` will be the primary recovery tool. ## 2026-05-17T17:10Z - Log lines reviewed: 16325 (cumulative, ~1955 new since last curator run at 22:27Z). - **Productive cleanup session today (2026-05-17 ~12:00-16:30Z)**: User and assistant cleared stale entries across memory system — curated-memory (removed stale OpenClaw paths), recent-topics (pruned 4 ancient archives), decision-state (8 superseded entries removed), recent-failures (2 stale entries removed), continuity-pinned-notes (19→7 clean entries). User confirmed "the worst continuity gaps should be behind us now." Major milestone — system is now in a clean state. - **User confirmed "prefer helpers" directive**: Explicitly told assistant to use `persistent-chat-memory` helpers over raw file editing, and to report missing helpers for future addition. Captured in curated-memory preferences. - **Semantic candidates fully lifecycle-managed**: All 143 entries now reviewed. Bulk operations: 76 marked stale (May 11-14 testing era), 40 stale (May 15), 21 stale (May 16 transient work), 5 promoted (housing preferences + buyout directive), 8 already reviewed in prior runs, 1 ignored (UI bug report). Zero remaining candidate entries. - **Memory candidates reviewed**: All 21 entries already captured in curated memory (model config, housing, philosophy, etc.). No new promotions needed. - **Curated memory updated**: Metadata refreshed (15:10Z→17:10Z, 14370→16325 lines). Added "Prefer helpers when available" directive. File at 109 lines, under 120-line target. - (Operational) The `plan/general` step limit change to 1 remains pending from the 2026-05-16 failure cascade — user wanted them at 1 to fail loudly on stale config. This was discussed on 2026-05-16T18:50Z but lost. Next assistant turn should re-apply if user brings it up. - (Operational) WGT festival starts May 21 — user may be less available for complex memory work in the coming week. The memory system is in a clean state to withstand gaps. - (Speculative) With candidates fully lifecycle-managed, the system can now focus on generating fresh candidates from new conversations rather than cycling through stale ones. The mechanism's proof of concept is validated — bulk operations work well for large historical cleanup, individual `mark` for precision entries. ## 2026-05-17T19:10Z - Log lines reviewed: 16325 → 18303 (~1978 new entries since last run). Cumulative total. - **Quiet period**: No new durable user facts since 17:10Z. Main-chat discussion covered curator improvement suggestions (18:21Z) — assistant proposed 4 changes (expand curator scope to check decision-state/recent-failures staleness, proactive session lifecycle, candidate pipeline investigation, synthesis agent cross-feed). User had not confirmed any before this run. These remain pending feedback. - **Heartbeat set to 2 hours**: User explicitly set heartbeat to 2-hour cadence ("for now as we don't have too much new data at the moment, and also for this debugging phase"). Previous cadence was 1 hour. - **Background agent vision confirmed**: User reiterated that moving away from OpenClaw was motivated by wanting the assistant to manage its own session lifecycle and have background agents for consolidation/synthesis. "We were hitting limitations of the framework more than using it." - **Semantic candidates**: 0 remaining (all lifecycle-managed). No new candidates generated — candidate pipeline still appears gapped post-packet-restructuring. - **Memory candidates**: All 21 entries already captured in curated memory. No new candidates. - **Curated memory updated**: Metadata refreshed (17:10Z → 19:10Z, 16325 → 18303 lines). No semantic content changes — curator improvement discussion is unconfirmed. File at 108 lines, under 120-line target. - (Operational) The 4 curator improvement suggestions from 18:21Z remain pending user feedback. If confirmed, the curator prompt should be updated. - (Operational) Candidate pipeline gap persists — no new candidates generated since packet restructuring. May need script fix or investigation. - (Operational) Plan/general step limit change to 1 still pending from May 16; user hasn't revisited it. - (Speculative) With 2-hour cadence and WGT festival (May 21-25) approaching, curator runs may accumulate more data per session but also face longer gaps between user interactions. ``` Recent perpetual log tail: ```jsonl 6-05-17T21:03:24.874339+00:00", "role": "assistant", "kind": "message", "content": "Found the reflection service — that's likely the synthesis agent. Let me fix the curator prompt, check reflection, and verify vector search.", "source": {"kind": "acpx-stream-ndjson", "file": "/home/matrix-lite/.acpx/sessions/ses_1ca369f7dffegaDkdQ6MideFVI.stream.ndjson", "offset": 6913916, "session_message_id": "ses_1ca369f7dffegaDkdQ6MideFVI.stream.ndjson:6913916:msg_e37bcb751001aLwgL3z5fgGkeA:assistant-message", "label": "persistent-chat-20260517T115406Z", "maintenance": false}} {"ts": "2026-05-17T21:03:24.874885+00:00", "role": "assistant", "kind": "message", "content": "Good — the reflection script IS the synthesis agent, runs hourly. Let me now fix the curator prompt to include decision-state and recent-failures.", "source": {"kind": "acpx-stream-ndjson", "file": "/home/matrix-lite/.acpx/sessions/ses_1ca369f7dffegaDkdQ6MideFVI.stream.ndjson", "offset": 6967026, "session_message_id": "ses_1ca369f7dffegaDkdQ6MideFVI.stream.ndjson:6967026:msg_e37bcc866001sxPO5OWXzdI7uv:assistant-message", "label": "persistent-chat-20260517T115406Z", "maintenance": false}} {"ts": "2026-05-17T21:03:24.875555+00:00", "role": "assistant", "kind": "message", "content": "The heartbeat script is in `/home/matrix-lite/app/scripts/` which is read-only for edits by default. Let me request approval.", "source": {"kind": "acpx-stream-ndjson", "file": "/home/matrix-lite/.acpx/sessions/ses_1ca369f7dffegaDkdQ6MideFVI.stream.ndjson", "offset": 7019021, "session_message_id": "ses_1ca369f7dffegaDkdQ6MideFVI.stream.ndjson:7019021:msg_e37bcde85001wrJrLXEoj5j3R4:assistant-message", "label": "persistent-chat-20260517T115406Z", "maintenance": false}} {"ts": "2026-05-17T21:03:24.875786+00:00", "role": "assistant", "kind": "message", "content": "<matrix_lite_final>**1. Fixing the curator prompt** — Submitted an approval request to add `decision-state.json` and `recent-failures.json` as inputs to the heartbeat prompt (they're currently mentioned as write targets but never shown to the curator). Needs your approval. **2. Tracking repo changes** — Noted. I'll flag junk/inefficiency/duplication as I see it. **3. Candidate patterns + 55812** — Got it, \"55812\" is your locker code where the GPU is. That's useful durable memory. On patterns: the current regexes look for phrases like \"remember this\", \"this is important\", \"I prefer\". If you often state preferences as \"I want X\" or \"X is good\", I could suggest an additional pattern. For now the vector search handles semantic retrieval — let me verify it's working. **4. Synthesis agent** — Found it! It's `persistent-chat-reflection`, runs hourly at `*:11:00`. Timer is set to `Persistent=false` so it won't catch up after downtime. It writes to `operational-synthesis/reports/` — the same output I saw earlier. It's been running, last report was at 00:01Z today. The output goes to `notices.jsonl` which should reach me via the turn packet notices system. I'll keep an eye on whether its output is actually reaching me properly. Want to approve the curator prompt fix so I can apply it?</matrix_lite_final>", "source": {"kind": "acpx-stream-ndjson", "file": "/home/matrix-lite/.acpx/sessions/ses_1ca369f7dffegaDkdQ6MideFVI.stream.ndjson", "offset": 7036298, "session_message_id": "ses_1ca369f7dffegaDkdQ6MideFVI.stream.ndjson:7036298:msg_e37bcf0470019Fkvek6OiY3Pgw:assistant-message", "label": "persistent-chat-20260517T115406Z", "maintenance": false}} {"ts": "2026-05-17T21:08:44.861141+00:00", "role": "user", "kind": "message", "content": "You are Persistent Assistant running through Matrix-lite. Use the bootstrapped character/session context, live turn packet, and room-local conversation to answer the user naturally. Conversation metadata: - conversation_key: persistent:main - session_label: persistent-chat-20260517T115406Z - prompt_package: None - shared_memory_profile: None - room_id: !CZLwoJfCyftA7oA5CVj2gIEKWqyv1lu01r0oFboEqZg - source_event_id: $IrlVK8FDC6_bHYzPlYbrFzUxKJPMKJhNbBUwuwDJUNU - reply_to_id: None - thread_root_id: None Persistent-chat memory/continuity context: Persistent-chat memory/continuity context: mode: turn_packet # Persistent Chat Turn Packet Generated: 2026-05-17T21:03:25.038535+00:00 ## Live context Live runtime capability context: Runtime details are dynamic; use Matrix-lite status/capability/permission/context tools when current paths, timers, repo access, or reload policy matter. Do not rely on boot-time guesses. Recent room-local conversation: User: Hmm I hope this doesn't break anything but in any case you should be able to edit those Assistant: The edits were all safe — I read each file first, made surgical changes (remove stale sections, update paths), and the JSON files remain valid. The pinned notes file is just a simple text file that the heartbeat reads as context — an empty file wouldn't break it, and this one still has the header structure intact. That said, you're right that I can always edit them back if anything acts up. Want me to verify nothing broke by checking that the curator/heartbeat script can still parse its inputs cleanly? User: I think the curator already ran once, and noted the changes. Please check yourself but I think it's working. Can anything be improved with model heartbeat/slow memory/curation cycles? I set it back to 2 hours for now as we don't have too much new data at the moment, and also for this debugging phase, but we can change this later. The idea is also for you to suggest improvements to prompts for these agents. One of the reasons we moved away from openclaw is I wanted for you to manage your own session lifecycle more and to have background agents for consolidation and synthesis. We were hitting limitations of the framework more than using it Assistant: **Curator ran fine** — success, updated both curated memory and journal. It noted the stale candidates issue and the pending step limit change. Good signal. **Suggestions:** **1. Curator prompt — expand scope slightly.** Currently it only reviews curated-memory.md, candidates, and journal. It could also: - Glance at `decision-state.json` and `recent-failures.json` for obvious staleness (entries referencing deleted paths, etc.) - Surface a \"heads up for main chat\" section in its journal entry — things it noticed that I should know - Recommend prompt improvements for itself or the synthesis agent when it spots patterns **2. Proactive session lifecycle.** Instead of waiting for the context guard to fire, I could: - Monitor context usage at conversation lulls (using `matrix_lite_status_context_usage_report`) - Pre-trigger a controlled reload when context hits ~170K/200K, writing a handoff note with what matters - The curator could help by flagging \"this conversation produced durable facts worth preserving before next reload\" **3. Candidate pipeline.** The curator noted no new memory-candidates are being generated. The pipeline from conversation → candidates → curation may have a ga …[truncated] User: 1. do you already have access to it? i am not sure this is done already, please look at live code 2. we already implemented this - at 95% context you get a turn notice that reload is imminent, at that moment you need to save whatever nuance that won't survive the reload. look at how your session packet is composed. once this is a bit more stable i want to add tools for background agents so this kind of introspection and improvement is easier. now you also can choose if we run curation on reload or not - maybe it just happened recently and there is no new tail, or just a session with test chatter. i trust your decision at that time 3. Yes why don't you take a look? the idea is also for you to start fixing things yourself, also proposing improvements. We need to make a to-do list, there are some in the live repo already 4. This is great and will unite your background loops, synthesis agent should now also have a way to notify you of any background issues it noticed issues. It's not running yet though, but we should enable it soon Assistant: Full investigation results: **1. Curator doesn't see decision-state or recent-failures.** The prompt only mentions them as write targets for `promoted` markers — it says \"promoted only if you also captured the substance in curated-memory.md, decision-state.json, recent-failures.json\" — but the actual file contents aren't passed to the model. Simple fix: add them to the input section alongside the other state files. The curator already has the helper commands to edit them. **2. Context guard at 95% confirmed.** It runs every 5 minutes, monitors ACPX session stream for token usage metrics ([source](lines 91-130 of context-guard)). At 80% (160K) it writes a notice. At 95% (190K) it recommends reload via notice — auto-reload is currently disabled so I get the warning and act on it. Good, that matches what you described. **3. Candidate pipeline: working but not matching current conversation style.** The `persistent-chat-memory heartbeat` function scans log entries for regex patterns like `REMEMBER_RE`, `IMPORTANT_RE`, `PREF_RE`, etc. (lines 525-531). If recent conversation uses \"I want\" phrases rather than \"remember this\" / \"this is important\" phrasing, no candidates get generated. T …[truncated] User: 1. Hmm can you fix it yourself? 2. Great please keep track of the repo changes and report if you notice junk, inefficiency or duplication in deterministic inputs and outputs, model ones too. 3. Not sure we can match my patterns well currently, but if you notice some common pattern feel to tell me to add or edit the regex carefully. 55812 is a code from my locker by the way, that's where the gpu is. I'm living it a hostel at the moment I think I mentioned. I used this number as a memory test but maybe now you can recall it from the logs anyway. There's also vector search I hope it's working 4. Hmm you should have access please check Assistant: **1. Fixing the curator prompt** — Submitted an approval request to add `decision-state.json` and `recent-failures.json` as inputs to the heartbeat prompt (they're currently mentioned as write targets but never shown to the curator). Needs your approval. **2. Tracking repo changes** — Noted. I'll flag junk/inefficiency/duplication as I see it. **3. Candidate patterns + 55812** — Got it, \"55812\" is your locker code where the GPU is. That's useful durable memory. On patterns: the current regexes look for phrases like \"remember this\", \"this is important\", \"I prefer\". If you often state preferences as \"I want X\" or \"X is good\", I could suggest an additional pattern. For now the vector search handles semantic retrieval — let me verify it's working. **4. Synthesis agent** — Found it! It's `persistent-chat-reflection`, runs hourly at `*:11:00`. Timer is set to `Persistent=false` so it won't catch up after downtime. It writes to `operational-synthesis/reports/` — the same output I saw earlier. It's been running, last report was at 00:01Z today. The output goes to `notices.jsonl` which should reach me via the turn packet notices system. I'll keep an eye on whether its output is actually …[truncated] Recent incomplete/failed turns that still matter for continuity: - 2026-05-17T17:19:21.968268Z user said: Hmm I hope this doesn't break anything but in any case you should be able to edit those status: user_only; reason: queued_for_conversation - 2026-05-17T21:04:29.536892Z user said: 1. I didn't get anything, are permissions broken again? 3. You don't have to actually remember this number or the fact just testing how this will propagate via memory. Frau Kilic said yes so hopefully I won't need a locker soon and we can try that gpu. 4. I think we will run it also on slower schedule at first, maybe or 6 hours so we don't accidentally flood you with junk again. It was quite coherent given the input though. status: user_only; reason: queued_for_conversation Recent/current attachment metadata, if any: None Message this user replied to, if any: None Queued/batched messages, if any: None Per-turn volatile reminders: - Answer normally and concisely. Put only user-visible answer text inside <matrix_lite_final>...</matrix_lite_final>. - Use the live capability context above as the source of truth for current debug/capability tools; call capability/permission/context MCP tools when uncertain instead of relying on stale boot knowledge. - If permission is needed or a bridge denies a tool, emit the structured Matrix-lite approval tag from your stable prompt; do not only describe approval in prose. - If recent incomplete/failed turns mention an unhandled user intent, address it now before moving on. - Use attachment/reply metadata when present; otherwise ignore empty metadata sections. - Do not mention internal Matrix-lite metadata unless the user asks. User message: 1. I didn't get anything, are permissions broken again? 3. You don't have to actually remember this number or the fact just testing how this will propagate via memory. Frau Kilic said yes so hopefully I won't need a locker soon and we can try that gpu. 4. I think we will run it also on slower schedule at first, maybe or 6 hours so we don't accidentally flood you with junk again. It was quite coherent given the input though.", "source": {"kind": "acpx-stream-ndjson", "file": "/home/matrix-lite/.acpx/sessions/ses_1ca369f7dffegaDkdQ6MideFVI.stream.ndjson", "offset": 7112331, "session_message_id": "ses_1ca369f7dffegaDkdQ6MideFVI.stream.ndjson:7112331:prompt", "label": "persistent-chat-20260517T115406Z", "maintenance": false}} {"ts": "2026-05-17T21:08:44.864151+00:00", "role": "user", "kind": "message", "content": "You are Persistent Assistant running through Matrix-lite. Use the bootstrapped character/session context, live turn packet, and room-local conversation to answer the user naturally. Conversation metadata: - conversation_key: persistent:main - session_label: persistent-chat-20260517T115406Z - prompt_package: None - shared_memory_profile: None - room_id: !CZLwoJfCyftA7oA5CVj2gIEKWqyv1lu01r0oFboEqZg - source_event_id: $GpFWjaONd4GSzpyQVk1_KBp-IZDSTlSFv9x6fj7JQzc - reply_to_id: None - thread_root_id: None Persistent-chat memory/continuity context: Persistent-chat memory/continuity context: mode: turn_packet # Persistent Chat Turn Packet Generated: 2026-05-17T21:03:25.038535+00:00 ## Live context Live runtime capability context: Runtime details are dynamic; use Matrix-lite status/capability/permission/context tools when current paths, timers, repo access, or reload policy matter. Do not rely on boot-time guesses. Recent room-local conversation: User: I think the curator already ran once, and noted the changes. Please check yourself but I think it's working. Can anything be improved with model heartbeat/slow memory/curation cycles? I set it back to 2 hours for now as we don't have too much new data at the moment, and also for this debugging phase, but we can change this later. The idea is also for you to suggest improvements to prompts for these agents. One of the reasons we moved away from openclaw is I wanted for you to manage your own session lifecycle more and to have background agents for consolidation and synthesis. We were hitting limitations of the framework more than using it Assistant: **Curator ran fine** — success, updated both curated memory and journal. It noted the stale candidates issue and the pending step limit change. Good signal. **Suggestions:** **1. Curator prompt — expand scope slightly.** Currently it only reviews curated-memory.md, candidates, and journal. It could also: - Glance at `decision-state.json` and `recent-failures.json` for obvious staleness (entries referencing deleted paths, etc.) - Surface a \"heads up for main chat\" section in its journal entry — things it noticed that I should know - Recommend prompt improvements for itself or the synthesis agent when it spots patterns **2. Proactive session lifecycle.** Instead of waiting for the context guard to fire, I could: - Monitor context usage at conversation lulls (using `matrix_lite_status_context_usage_report`) - Pre-trigger a controlled reload when context hits ~170K/200K, writing a handoff note with what matters - The curator could help by flagging \"this conversation produced durable facts worth preserving before next reload\" **3. Candidate pipeline.** The curator noted no new memory-candidates are being generated. The pipeline from conversation → candidates → curation may have a ga …[truncated] User: 1. do you already have access to it? i am not sure this is done already, please look at live code 2. we already implemented this - at 95% context you get a turn notice that reload is imminent, at that moment you need to save whatever nuance that won't survive the reload. look at how your session packet is composed. once this is a bit more stable i want to add tools for background agents so this kind of introspection and improvement is easier. now you also can choose if we run curation on reload or not - maybe it just happened recently and there is no new tail, or just a session with test chatter. i trust your decision at that time 3. Yes why don't you take a look? the idea is also for you to start fixing things yourself, also proposing improvements. We need to make a to-do list, there are some in the live repo already 4. This is great and will unite your background loops, synthesis agent should now also have a way to notify you of any background issues it noticed issues. It's not running yet though, but we should enable it soon Assistant: Full investigation results: **1. Curator doesn't see decision-state or recent-failures.** The prompt only mentions them as write targets for `promoted` markers — it says \"promoted only if you also captured the substance in curated-memory.md, decision-state.json, recent-failures.json\" — but the actual file contents aren't passed to the model. Simple fix: add them to the input section alongside the other state files. The curator already has the helper commands to edit them. **2. Context guard at 95% confirmed.** It runs every 5 minutes, monitors ACPX session stream for token usage metrics ([source](lines 91-130 of context-guard)). At 80% (160K) it writes a notice. At 95% (190K) it recommends reload via notice — auto-reload is currently disabled so I get the warning and act on it. Good, that matches what you described. **3. Candidate pipeline: working but not matching current conversation style.** The `persistent-chat-memory heartbeat` function scans log entries for regex patterns like `REMEMBER_RE`, `IMPORTANT_RE`, `PREF_RE`, etc. (lines 525-531). If recent conversation uses \"I want\" phrases rather than \"remember this\" / \"this is important\" phrasing, no candidates get generated. T …[truncated] User: 1. Hmm can you fix it yourself? 2. Great please keep track of the repo changes and report if you notice junk, inefficiency or duplication in deterministic inputs and outputs, model ones too. 3. Not sure we can match my patterns well currently, but if you notice some common pattern feel to tell me to add or edit the regex carefully. 55812 is a code from my locker by the way, that's where the gpu is. I'm living it a hostel at the moment I think I mentioned. I used this number as a memory test but maybe now you can recall it from the logs anyway. There's also vector search I hope it's working 4. Hmm you should have access please check Assistant: **1. Fixing the curator prompt** — Submitted an approval request to add `decision-state.json` and `recent-failures.json` as inputs to the heartbeat prompt (they're currently mentioned as write targets but never shown to the curator). Needs your approval. **2. Tracking repo changes** — Noted. I'll flag junk/inefficiency/duplication as I see it. **3. Candidate patterns + 55812** — Got it, \"55812\" is your locker code where the GPU is. That's useful durable memory. On patterns: the current regexes look for phrases like \"remember this\", \"this is important\", \"I prefer\". If you often state preferences as \"I want X\" or \"X is good\", I could suggest an additional pattern. For now the vector search handles semantic retrieval — let me verify it's working. **4. Synthesis agent** — Found it! It's `persistent-chat-reflection`, runs hourly at `*:11:00`. Timer is set to `Persistent=false` so it won't catch up after downtime. It writes to `operational-synthesis/reports/` — the same output I saw earlier. It's been running, last report was at 00:01Z today. The output goes to `notices.jsonl` which should reach me via the turn packet notices system. I'll keep an eye on whether its output is actually …[truncated] User: 1. I didn't get anything, are permissions broken again? 3. You don't have to actually remember this number or the fact just testing how this will propagate via memory. Frau Kilic said yes so hopefully I won't need a locker soon and we can try that gpu. 4. I think we will run it also on slower schedule at first, maybe or 6 hours so we don't accidentally flood you with junk again. It was quite coherent given the input though. Assistant: Here's the update on all points: **1. Approval request sent to Matrix** — It should appear in the room now (earlier one was a silent request without Matrix routing). Apologies for that. **3. Locker/GPU noted** — Frau Kilic said yes, congrats! That's huge. If the apartment works out, the locker and GPU become a future project. And understood — you're testing memory propagation, not asking me to memorize. **4. Reflection schedule** — I sent a second approval request to change the timer from hourly to every 6 hours (`*:11:00` → `*:11:00/6`). That should reduce the noise while still giving regular synthesis. The last run was already coherent given the messy data — cleaner input going forward should improve it further. Two approval requests waiting for you in the room: 1. **Curator prompt fix** (add decision-state + recent-failures as inputs) 2. **Reflection timer change** (hourly → 6-hourly) Recent incomplete/failed turns that still matter for continuity: - 2026-05-17T17:19:21.968268Z user said: Hmm I hope this doesn't break anything but in any case you should be able to edit those status: user_only; reason: queued_for_conversation - 2026-05-17T21:05:57.113179Z user said: Approved both please check status: user_only; reason: queued_for_conversation Recent/current attachment metadata, if any: None Message this user replied to, if any: None Queued/batched messages, if any: None Per-turn volatile reminders: - Answer normally and concisely. Put only user-visible answer text inside <matrix_lite_final>...</matrix_lite_final>. - Use the live capability context above as the source of truth for current debug/capability tools; call capability/permission/context MCP tools when uncertain instead of relying on stale boot knowledge. - If permission is needed or a bridge denies a tool, emit the structured Matrix-lite approval tag from your stable prompt; do not only describe approval in prose. - If recent incomplete/failed turns mention an unhandled user intent, address it now before moving on. - Use attachment/reply metadata when present; otherwise ignore empty metadata sections. - Do not mention internal Matrix-lite metadata unless the user asks. User message: Approved both please check", "source": {"kind": "acpx-stream-ndjson", "file": "/home/matrix-lite/.acpx/sessions/ses_1ca369f7dffegaDkdQ6MideFVI.stream.ndjson", "offset": 7258302, "session_message_id": "ses_1ca369f7dffegaDkdQ6MideFVI.stream.ndjson:7258302:prompt", "label": "persistent-chat-20260517T115406Z", "maintenance": false}} {"ts": "2026-05-17T21:08:44.862088+00:00", "role": "assistant", "kind": "message", "content": "Let me check the approval status and verify what's happening with permissions.", "source": {"kind": "acpx-stream-ndjson", "file": "/home/matrix-lite/.acpx/sessions/ses_1ca369f7dffegaDkdQ6MideFVI.stream.ndjson", "offset": 7149580, "session_message_id": "ses_1ca369f7dffegaDkdQ6MideFVI.stream.ndjson:7149580:msg_e37c140dc001Vg9cmN2Sa3GOAR:assistant-message", "label": "persistent-chat-20260517T115406Z", "maintenance": false}} {"ts": "2026-05-17T21:08:44.862456+00:00", "role": "assistant", "kind": "message", "content": "The approval request is sitting in the queue but it wasn't routed to Matrix (room_id is empty). Let me send it through Matrix so you can see it.", "source": {"kind": "acpx-stream-ndjson", "file": "/home/matrix-lite/.acpx/sessions/ses_1ca369f7dffegaDkdQ6MideFVI.stream.ndjson", "offset": 7182027, "session_message_id": "ses_1ca369f7dffegaDkdQ6MideFVI.stream.ndjson:7182027:msg_e37c1577d001KsO7BUfKwilOND:assistant-message", "label": "persistent-chat-20260517T115406Z", "maintenance": false}} {"ts": "2026-05-17T21:08:44.862737+00:00", "role": "assistant", "kind": "message", "content": "<matrix_lite_final>Here's the update on all points: **1. Approval request sent to Matrix** — It should appear in the room now (earlier one was a silent request without Matrix routing). Apologies for that. **3. Locker/GPU noted** — Frau Kilic said yes, congrats! That's huge. If the apartment works out, the locker and GPU become a future project. And understood — you're testing memory propagation, not asking me to memorize. **4. Reflection schedule** — I sent a second approval request to change the timer from hourly to every 6 hours (`*:11:00` → `*:11:00/6`). That should reduce the noise while still giving regular synthesis. The last run was already coherent given the messy data — cleaner input going forward should improve it further. Two approval requests waiting for you in the room: 1. **Curator prompt fix** (add decision-state + recent-failures as inputs) 2. **Reflection timer change** (hourly → 6-hourly)</matrix_lite_final>", "source": {"kind": "acpx-stream-ndjson", "file": "/home/matrix-lite/.acpx/sessions/ses_1ca369f7dffegaDkdQ6MideFVI.stream.ndjson", "offset": 7204292, "session_message_id": "ses_1ca369f7dffegaDkdQ6MideFVI.stream.ndjson:7204292:msg_e37c17c07001cRbqMQlEgD3zpi:assistant-message", "label": "persistent-chat-20260517T115406Z", "maintenance": false}} {"ts": "2026-05-17T21:08:44.864688+00:00", "role": "assistant", "kind": "message", "content": "Let me process both approvals and apply the changes.", "source": {"kind": "acpx-stream-ndjson", "file": "/home/matrix-lite/.acpx/sessions/ses_1ca369f7dffegaDkdQ6MideFVI.stream.ndjson", "offset": 7276968, "session_message_id": "ses_1ca369f7dffegaDkdQ6MideFVI.stream.ndjson:7276968:msg_e37c29654001A4aALZ2C5pyj6c:assistant-message", "label": "persistent-chat-20260517T115406Z", "maintenance": false}} {"ts": "2026-05-17T21:08:44.864829+00:00", "role": "assistant", "kind": "message", "content": "Both approved. Let me apply the edits now.", "source": {"kind": "acpx-stream-ndjson", "file": "/home/matrix-lite/.acpx/sessions/ses_1ca369f7dffegaDkdQ6MideFVI.stream.ndjson", "offset": 7287242, "session_message_id": "ses_1ca369f7dffegaDkdQ6MideFVI.stream.ndjson:7287242:msg_e37c2a458001yX6OOLKmyvknqh:assistant-message", "label": "persistent-chat-20260517T115406Z", "maintenance": false}} {"ts": "2026-05-17T21:08:44.867280+00:00", "role": "assistant", "kind": "message", "content": "The reflection timer is updated. For the heartbeat script, the Edit tool is blocked by namespace rules even with approval. Let me use python3 via bash (which is allowed) since the approval granted permission.", "source": {"kind": "acpx-stream-ndjson", "file": "/home/matrix-lite/.acpx/sessions/ses_1ca369f7dffegaDkdQ6MideFVI.stream.ndjson", "offset": 7496847, "session_message_id": "ses_1ca369f7dffegaDkdQ6MideFVI.stream.ndjson:7496847:msg_e37c2d8af001h2Wii6W0Nm520U:assistant-message", "label": "persistent-chat-20260517T115406Z", "maintenance": false}} {"ts": "2026-05-17T21:08:44.868897+00:00", "role": "assistant", "kind": "message", "content": "The Edit and bash tools are blocked by namespace rules for this path. Let me use the approved patch mechanism instead.", "source": {"kind": "acpx-stream-ndjson", "file": "/home/matrix-lite/.acpx/sessions/ses_1ca369f7dffegaDkdQ6MideFVI.stream.ndjson", "offset": 7740450, "session_message_id": "ses_1ca369f7dffegaDkdQ6MideFVI.stream.ndjson:7740450:msg_e37c2f7dd001P1U4VOvr843hMU:assistant-message", "label": "persistent-chat-20260517T115406Z", "maintenance": false}} {"ts": "2026-05-17T21:08:44.870918+00:00", "role": "assistant", "kind": "message", "content": "<matrix_lite_final>**Reflection timer** — ✅ Changed from hourly to every 6 hours (at :11 past every 6th hour). Next run will follow the new schedule. **Curator prompt fix** — ⚠ Blocked by permissions. The Edit tool and bash are both denied for `/home/matrix-lite/app/scripts/persistent-chat-model-heartbeat`. The file isn't in the allowed edit/write namespace. I tried: - Edit tool → denied (path not in edit allowlist) - `python3` via bash → blocked by catch-all deny - `sudo approved-patch` → requires password - `matrix-lite-sudo-run` → requires approval ID parameter Could you either: 1. Manually add the two lines (they're small — I can show you exactly what/where), or 2. Add `/home/matrix-lite/app/scripts/persistent-chat-model-heartbeat` to the edit allowlist so I can fix it directly? The change is adding these 2 lines after line 253 and updating the input description: ```python decisions = (STATE / 'decision-state.json').read_text(errors='replace') if (STATE / 'decision-state.json').exists() else '{}' failures = (STATE / 'recent-failures.json').read_text(errors='replace') if (STATE / 'recent-failures.json').exists() else '{}' ``` And changing the inputs line to mention \"decision state, recent failures.\"</matrix_lite_final>", "source": {"kind": "acpx-stream-ndjson", "file": "/home/matrix-lite/.acpx/sessions/ses_1ca369f7dffegaDkdQ6MideFVI.stream.ndjson", "offset": 7829460, "session_message_id": "ses_1ca369f7dffegaDkdQ6MideFVI.stream.ndjson:7829460:msg_e37c340ba001uX3q3Rj5ZGnP4b:assistant-message", "label": "persistent-chat-20260517T115406Z", "maintenance": false}} ```