I’m opening the latest attached PDF now and extracting the filled information from it. After that I’ll give you a structured list of what I could read and what still needs clarification.Yes — I could extract most of it. Here is the form content in structured form, with a few places marked as uncertain. ## Mietobjekt - **Adresse:** Edith-Stein-Straße 2, 85716 Unterschleißheim - **Mietbeginn:** 18.05.2026 - **Gewünschter Einzugstermin:** 18.05.2026 - **Nettokaltmiete:** 1.200,00 € - **Betriebskostenvorauszahlungen:** 400,00 € - **Kaution:** 3.600,00 € ## Mietinteressent/in 1 - **Name:** Krylov Gleb - **Geburtsdatum:** 21.04.1982 - **Familienstand:** verheiratet - **Bisherige Anschrift:** Walther-Meissner-Str. 8, Garching 85748 - **Telefon privat:** +49 1575 133 29 45 - **Telefon mobil:** leer - **E-Mail:** krylov@posteo.net - **Bisheriger Vermieter:** Familie Pfeuffer - **Anschrift/Telefon Vermieter:** Olgastr. 3, München 80636 ## Mietinteressent/in 2 - **Name:** Nikiforova Anastasia - **Geburtsdatum:** 03.01.1998 - **Familienstand:** verheiratet - **Bisherige Anschrift:** Walther-Meissner-Str. 8, Garching 85748 - **Telefon privat:** +49 1575 133 29 50 - **Telefon mobil:** leer - **E-Mail:** celticfrost@gmail.com - **Bisheriger Vermieter:** Familie Pfeuffer - **Anschrift/Telefon Vermieter:** Olgastr. 3, München 80636 ## Arbeit / Einkommen ### Person 1 - **Derzeitiger Arbeitgeber:** Munich Quantum Instruments GmbH - **Anschrift/Telefon Arbeitgeber:** Lichtenbergstr. 8, Garching 85748 - **Beschäftigt in ungekündigter Stellung seit:** 01.04.2026 - **Derzeitig ausgeübter Beruf:** Elektroingenieur - **Selbstständig als:** — - **Aktuelles monatliches Gesamt-Nettoeinkommen:** 3922,54 € ### Person 2 - **Derzeitiger Arbeitgeber:** — - **Anschrift/Telefon Arbeitgeber:** — - **Beschäftigt in ungekündigter Stellung seit:** — - **Derzeitig ausgeübter Beruf:** Studentin - **Selbstständig als:** — - **Aktuelles monatliches Gesamt-Nettoeinkommen:** — ## Haushalt - **Einziehende Personen:** 2 - **Weitere Personen / Kinder / Verwandte / Mitbewohner:** keine eingetragen - **Haustiere:** keine ## Aktuelles Mietverhältnis This line is a bit hard to read, but I think it says: - **Aktuelles Mietverhältnis:** „entfällt – derzeit kein Mietverhältnis“ And the Kündigungs/Grund line appears to say roughly: - **Vorheriges befristetes Mietverhältnis endete regulär zum 01.03.2025** This part is one of the few OCR-uncertain spots. ## Schulden / Verpflichtungen / Insolvenz - **Teilzahlungsgeschäfte:** — - **Darlehensverpflichtungen:** keine - **Bürgschaften / sonstige Verpflichtungen:** — - **Eidesstattliche Versicherung / Vermögensauskunft in letzten 3 Jahren:** nein - **Haftbefehl / entsprechendes Verfahren:** nein - **Konkurs-/Vergleichs-/Insolvenzverfahren in letzten 5 Jahren:** nein ## Zahlungsfähigkeit / Beilagen - **Mietsicherheit leistbar:** 3.600 € - **Geforderte Miete laufend zahlbar:** ja - **Mietschuldenfreiheitsbescheinigung beigefügt:** ja - **SCHUFA-Auskunft beigefügt:** ja ## Ort / Datum / Unterschriften - **Ort:** München - **Datum:** 17.05.2026 - **Unterschriften:** Gleb Krylov, Anastasia Nikiforova ## Things I’d like you to confirm Only a few items are uncertain enough that I’d want your confirmation: 1. Is the move-out / previous lease note really: - **„vorheriges befristetes Mietverhältnis endete regulär zum 01.03.2025“**? 2. Is the first line under current Mietverhältnis really: - **„entfällt – derzeit kein Mietverhältnis“**? 3. Is **celticfrost@gmail.com** still the intended email on the form? If you want, I can now turn this into: - a **clean typed version** of the same Selbstauskunft, or - a **missing/needs-update checklist** before you send it to Dudium.


1. Ended 01.08.2025. 2. Yes 3. Yes with 2 f I am thinking if I should somehow attach a new header while keeping the form original. Original was signed by my wife and hand filled by us, but it was on paper and for a different flat. Should I just fill out the new clean form and not sign it (landlord saw me today and will also get my work contract with signature) or should I just fill out the header for the new address and rent and attach it to old PDF?


I would **not** patch the old PDF. Best option: - **make a new clean form for this flat** - fill it digitally - update all fields cleanly - ideally **sign it again** - send that as the actual Selbstauskunft for Dudium Why: - the old one is for a **different flat** - changing only the header looks messy and slightly suspicious - landlords like clean, coherent paperwork - if dates/rent/address mismatch, it creates avoidable doubt ## My recommendation ### Best - new clean form - correct address / rent / move-in - corrected line: - previous lease ended **01.08.2025** - corrected email: - yes, with **two f** - sign it if possible ### If signing again is annoying Then I’d still prefer: - **new clean unsigned form** over - old signed form with edited header Because: - a clean unsigned PDF looks normal - a recycled signed form for another apartment can look sloppy or odd ## Practical hierarchy 1. **New clean form, signed** ← best 2. **New clean form, unsigned** ← still okay 3. **Old form with edited header** ← weakest option ## About the signature Since: - he met you in person - you will send salary slips - maybe contract too an **unsigned clean form is probably acceptable** if needed. But if your wife can sign too without much effort, better: - both names - both signatures - current date ## What to reuse from the old form Reuse the content, but update: - property address - rent / Nebenkosten / Kaution - desired move-in - previous lease ended **01.08.2025** - email spelling with **ff** - today’s date / current date ## What I would send Dudium - clean new Selbstauskunft - SCHUFA - salary slips - maybe contract / relevant pages ## Short answer **Do a new clean form. Don’t edit the old PDF header only.** Unsigned is okay if necessary, but a newly signed clean version is best. If you want, I can now help you produce the **final corrected typed content** for the new form, field by field.


Please fill out the form and save it on disk. Let me know if anything is unclear


I’m going to save a clean filled-out version on disk now, using the corrected details we extracted plus your clarifications, and I’ll flag any field that is still genuinely ambiguous.Done — I saved a clean filled-out version here: - `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-ausgefuellt.md` I used: - Dudium’s flat details - your corrected lease end date: **01.08.2025** - the “derzeit kein Mietverhältnis” wording - the corrected email with **two f** What is still unclear / worth checking: 1. whether **Anastasia** should have any income listed 2. whether her employer/student fields should stay blank exactly like the old form 3. whether you want to send it **unsigned** or sign it first If you want, next I can also turn this into a more **form-like plain text version** for easier copy/paste into a PDF editor, or help draft the email that goes with it.


1 no income I told it to him in person. 2 yes probably 3 I guess I can send unsigned - I promised today, but offer him to get my or my wife's signature or that she can fill and sign it. August 8 is far enough away and as I understand contracts in Germany also work by mail, so I just need to send him my stuff. Also I can't really do the signing process for everyone


Yes — that sounds reasonable. Given what you said, I would do exactly this: - send the **clean unsigned form today** - keep **Anastasia income empty** - keep her employer/student area basically as is - add a short note that you can provide a **signed version on request** That is a good balance between: - being fast - being honest - not creating extra process for every single application And yes, for this stage, the important thing is mostly: - he gets the information - the package looks clean - you respond quickly Not: - formal perfection on day one ## Practical recommendation Send: 1. Selbstauskunft (clean, unsigned) 2. SCHUFA 3. salary slips 4. work contract / relevant pages And in the message say that a signed version can be sent if needed. ## Good short German message > Guten Tag Herr Dudium, > vielen Dank noch einmal für die Besichtigung und das angenehme Gespräch. > Anbei sende ich Ihnen die gewünschten Unterlagen: Selbstauskunft, SCHUFA, Gehaltsabrechnungen und Arbeitsvertrag. > Die Selbstauskunft sende ich Ihnen zunächst in digitaler Form. Falls Sie eine unterschriebene Version benötigen, kann ich diese gerne noch nachreichen. > Bei Rückfragen stehe ich gerne zur Verfügung. > Mit freundlichen Grüßen > Gleb Krylov ## About the unsigned form I think this is completely defensible because: - you already met in person - he already knows the situation - you are not refusing to sign - you are just avoiding unnecessary friction unless he actually wants it That is normal and pragmatic. If you want, I can now help with one of these: 1. make the **final Selbstauskunft text cleaner** 2. suggest **which work contract pages** to include 3. tighten the email wording even more


Let's make the text cleaner where possible, those explanations can probably be made nicer or skipped, I don't know


Yes — I would make it cleaner and more neutral. For this kind of document, less explanation is usually better. The form should look: - factual - calm - minimal - not defensive ## What I would simplify ### Instead of - “entfällt – derzeit kein Mietverhältnis” better: - **Derzeit kein Mietverhältnis** ### Instead of - “vorheriges befristetes Mietverhältnis endete regulär zum 01.08.2025” better: - **Befristetes Mietverhältnis endete regulär am 01.08.2025** That says the same thing, but looks cleaner. ## General rule If a field is not required: - leave it blank, or - answer in the shortest neutral way possible Avoid: - long explanations - narrative sentences - justification language ## Clean version for the potentially awkward part I’d use: - **Mein / unser derzeitiges Mietverhältnis besteht seit:** **Derzeit kein Mietverhältnis** - **Mein / unser derzeitiges Mietverhältnis wurde gekündigt seitens / wegen:** **Befristetes Mietverhältnis endete regulär am 01.08.2025** That is probably the cleanest wording. ## Email text can also be cleaner Instead of the longer explanation about signatures, I’d shorten it to: > Guten Tag Herr Dudium, > vielen Dank noch einmal für die Besichtigung und das angenehme Gespräch. > Anbei sende ich Ihnen die gewünschten Unterlagen: Selbstauskunft, SCHUFA, Gehaltsabrechnungen und Arbeitsvertrag. > Falls Sie eine unterschriebene Fassung der Selbstauskunft benötigen, kann ich diese gerne nachreichen. > Mit freundlichen Grüßen > Gleb Krylov That’s enough. No need to explain why it is unsigned unless he asks. ## My recommendation Yes: - make the form text more neutral - shorten the “no current tenancy” section - shorten the email - remove explanatory language wherever possible If you want, I can now rewrite the **exact final wording** for the few fields that still sound clunky.


Yes please rewrite them. Make sure we are using info from the listing. Please send me the filled form as matrix message in PDF


I’m tightening the wording in the saved form first, then I’ll generate a PDF from the cleaned version and send that PDF here as a Matrix file.I cleaned the wording in the saved version. Now I’m generating an actual PDF from it so I can send you the filled form as a Matrix attachment.The shell denied my first attempt because of the multiline command format, so I’m retrying with a single-line safe command to generate the PDF.I wrote a small local generator script for the filled Selbstauskunft PDF. Next I’m running it, then I’ll send the resulting PDF here as a Matrix file.Done — I generated the cleaned filled PDF and sent it here as a Matrix file. File sent: - `$BL3zcRNE95vnsxi6Eo1liQHbBIBPX9RR-u_H1v9tQ4k` Local files: - PDF: `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-ausgefuellt.pdf` - Source text: `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-ausgefuellt.md` I also cleaned the wording as discussed: - **Derzeit kein Mietverhältnis** - **Befristetes Mietverhältnis endete regulär am 01.08.2025** One thing to keep in mind: - this is a **clean generated PDF**, not the original ImmoScout form layout reproduced exactly - but the content is there in a neat landlord-readable format If you want, next I can: 1. draft the final email text for Dudium, 2. suggest which contract pages to attach, 3. or help make this PDF even more form-like if needed.


Hmm I think you need to take the original empty immoscout PDF and fill it out with our text, and then send it to me. Converting markdown loses all formatting of original immoscout form


You’re right — the markdown-to-PDF version loses the original ImmoScout form layout. I’ll use the original attached ImmoScout PDF as the base, cover the old handwritten values, overlay the cleaned typed values in place, and then send you that filled PDF.I wrote an overlay-based filler that keeps the original ImmoScout form layout and replaces the handwritten values with typed ones. Now I’m generating that PDF and will send it to you.PyPDF2 isn’t installed in this runtime, so I’m checking for an available PDF library alternative and then I’ll rerun the overlay generation with that.Good — `pikepdf` is available, so I can use that to stamp the typed overlay onto the original ImmoScout PDF without losing the form layout. I’m switching the generator to that backend now.I updated the script to use `pikepdf` for the overlay merge. I’m regenerating the filled original-layout PDF now.The installed `pikepdf` version has a slightly different `add_overlay` signature. I’m removing that extra argument and rerunning.Retrying the filled original-layout PDF generation now.The original-layout filled PDF is generated successfully. I’m sending that version to you now as the Matrix attachment.Done — I used the original ImmoScout form layout as the base, overlaid the cleaned typed values onto it, and sent that PDF here as a Matrix file. Sent file: - `$lW2RMLzYrBhwHmkU_rprOTV--SkBmTCSA0CGFaVjp5o` Local file: - `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-layout.pdf` This version should preserve the original form formatting much better than the markdown-generated PDF. One caveat: - because this was an overlay onto the old handwritten/scanned form, some alignment may still be a bit imperfect in places - but it should look much closer to the original ImmoScout template If you want, next I can help with: 1. a final **short email text** to Dudium, 2. checking whether this PDF still needs any tiny textual correction, 3. or deciding which contract pages to include.


Is it really just 2 months kaution? Also, please use the original empty form from immoscout, here you just overlaid the text over the filled one


I’m checking two things directly: 1. whether **2 months Kaution** is consistent with the listing details 2. whether I can get the **actual empty ImmoScout form/PDF template** instead of reusing the scanned filled one.I’m checking the Kaution against the saved listing details, and I’m also pulling the ImmoScout template page to see if I can get the actual blank PDF/Word source instead of the reused scan.Yes — **2.200 € Kaution = exactly 2 cold rents**, because the listing says: - **Kaltmiete:** 1.100 € - so **2 × 1.100 € = 2.200 €** So that part is consistent with the listing. It’s a bit unusual because **3 cold rents** is common, but **2 months** is totally possible and not a problem. And yes — you were right about the form: - the version I sent used the **filled scanned form as base** - that is **not** the same as using the real **empty ImmoScout original** I’ve now found the actual ImmoScout blank PDF source on their site: - `/content/dam/is24/eigentuemer/dokumente/mieterselbstauskunft_immoscout24_2025.pdf` So the correct next step is: - use that **real empty ImmoScout PDF** - fill it with your data - then send you that version If you want, I can redo it properly from the real blank ImmoScout form next.


Yes please


I’m going to fetch the real blank ImmoScout PDF template, stamp your data onto that clean original, and then send you the corrected version here.The real blank PDF is downloaded. I’m checking its page layout quickly so I can make sure the overlay lands on the clean form rather than the old scanned one.Great — I have the real blank ImmoScout PDF now. I’m filling that clean original form directly and will send you that version instead.I switched the overlay script to the real blank ImmoScout PDF source. Now I’m generating the properly filled clean-form version.The clean original-form version is generated. I’m sending that corrected PDF here now.Done — this time I used the **real blank ImmoScout PDF** as the base and filled that clean original form. Sent file: - `$GlqVSiFwsg4Amsh-CJGiPyvwgIPBfaDd4EuuPevD6eM` Local file: - `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-blank-filled.pdf` So now you have: - the earlier typed/overlay experiments - and the **proper filled blank ImmoScout form** version If you want, next I can help with: 1. a very short final email to Dudium, 2. checking whether this PDF has any visible alignment issue you want to tweak, 3. or choosing which contract pages to attach.


Some of the text is misaligned, actually most of it. Can you find the form fields better? It's a fillable form


Yes — if it’s a real fillable PDF, that’s much better than coordinate overlaying. I’m going to inspect the actual form fields in the blank ImmoScout PDF and then fill the fields directly instead of guessing positions.Good news: it really does have AcroForm text fields. I’m listing the actual field names now so I can map your data properly and generate a clean filled version.The blank PDF exposes real text fields, so I can fill it properly instead of guessing positions. I’m pulling the rest of the field list and then I’ll generate a true field-filled version.I have the field count; now I’m dumping the full field list to a local text file so I can map the exact names cleanly and fill the PDF form directly.The blank PDF is a real AcroForm, but it has a slightly messy field structure — some fields are duplicated and some page widgets are grouped oddly. I’m checking the field tree/hierarchy so I can target the real form fields instead of only the visible widgets.I found something slightly annoying: the ImmoScout PDF is only **partly** a real form. Some fields are genuine AcroForm text fields, but a lot of the visible blanks are not exposed as named fields at all. So the best practical fix is: - fill the **real fields directly** - and only **overlay the missing non-field parts** That should give a cleaner result than pure overlaying. I’m generating that improved hybrid version now.I wrote a hybrid filler: real fields where available, overlay only where ImmoScout didn’t expose fields. I’m generating that improved version now.Minor pikepdf object-access mismatch — fixing that and regenerating.Retrying the hybrid filled PDF generation now.The hybrid version generated successfully. I’m sending this improved PDF now — it should align better than the pure overlay version.I found that the ImmoScout PDF is only **partly** a real fillable form, so I made a better version: - **real PDF fields filled directly where they actually exist** - **overlay only for the blanks ImmoScout did not expose as fields** I sent that improved hybrid version here: - `$RRaTGwn715SbxCAuGD6IFWpOvvhFanpdEGIei_C8GdU` Local file: - `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-hybrid.pdf` So now you have three variants: 1. plain generated PDF 2. full overlay on blank form 3. **hybrid field-fill + minimal overlay** ← probably the best so far If this one still has bad alignment somewhere, send me exactly which fields look off, and I can tune just those instead of redoing everything.


Some of them are misplaced still, please check fix and resend


I’m opening the latest hybrid PDF I generated so I can visually inspect where the misplaced fields landed and correct them before resending.I inspected the generated PDF visually — the main problem is that several values are sitting too high and colliding with the field labels. I’m switching to a **clean blank-form overlay only** with corrected positions, instead of mixing field-fill and overlay.I made a v2 overlay with lower, more conservative placements to avoid label collisions. I’m generating that corrected PDF now.The improved v2 PDF generated successfully. I’m sending this corrected version now.I corrected the placements and sent you a new version: - `$E4L-suc8v1amCSeeISCRME3pD6tsMURU_rN1CShgW0U` Local file: - `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-blank-filled-v2.pdf` What I changed: - moved most values lower inside the cells - reduced collisions with field labels - kept the real blank ImmoScout PDF as the base If this one is still off, tell me **which exact fields** are misplaced (for example: “page 1 names”, “page 2 current tenancy line”, “page 3 signatures”), and I can tune just those quickly.


Now everything is a bit too low I think


Got it — I overcorrected downward. I’m nudging the overlay upward a bit across the form and will resend a v3 version.I nudged the placements upward across the three pages. I’m generating a v3 now and will resend it.I moved everything a bit upward and resent it. Newest version: - `$x7rHa5CF0pQhmVwTMc8DwA1g0bO8qq6MgR2FrdmjfZ4` Local file: - `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-blank-filled-v2.pdf` I know this is a bit iterative, but this should be closer now. If it’s still off, the fastest way is: - tell me exactly **which page + which fields** are wrong for example: - “page 1 names still too low” - “page 2 current tenancy line too high” - “page 3 date/signature line off” Then I can do a very targeted final adjustment instead of shifting everything again.


Some fields need to be slightly higher still


Understood — I’ll make a small upward adjustment, not a big shift this time, and resend a v4.I made a small upward nudge across the fields. Generating and resending now.I nudged the fields slightly upward and resent it. Newest version: - `$QYKTDTOrfO1aEVLmAei0QU5CeZ-LxhBXcBARpBpV9hg` Local file: - `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-blank-filled-v2.pdf` This should be a bit closer without the big overcorrection. If it’s still not right, the fastest path now is for you to tell me just one or two specific problem areas, like: - “page 1 left column still low” - “page 2 current tenancy line still low” - “page 3 bottom names/date still low” Then I can make a surgical fix instead of shifting the whole form again.


Please fix other fields too, you can see the mismatches


I’m reopening the latest PDF I sent so I can visually inspect the current misplacements directly and correct more than just one or two fields this time.I can see the bigger mismatches now — especially on page 1 lower rows and page 2 employment/current-tenancy rows. I’m doing a more targeted correction for those areas and will resend.I adjusted the page 1 lower rows and the page 2 work/current-tenancy rows more aggressively this time. Generating and sending the corrected version now.I fixed the more obviously mismatched areas and resent it. Newest version: - `$BQ5xocLEii1lDWkSNbceTx3WFhaPLPKaq4PVtNVtbI8` Local file: - `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-blank-filled-v2.pdf` Main changes this time: - page 1: names / birth dates / marital status / address / email / landlord blocks - page 2: employer and address rows moved up into the correct boxes - page 2: current-tenancy / previous-lease lines shifted closer to the intended lines If this one is still imperfect, we’re now close enough that a **very narrow last tweak** should do it. If you want, tell me only the remaining bad spots and I’ll adjust just those.


Better but you are still missing a lot of fields, some are okay though


I found two different problems at once: - page 1 lower rows are still a bit low - page 2 employment rows are actually sitting one row too low - page 2 tenancy lines are too high and need to drop down I’m doing that mixed correction now and will resend.I’ve got the exact current coordinates open now. I’m making the mixed correction I described: page 1 lower blocks slightly up, page 2 employment up, page 2 tenancy lines down.Generating the corrected version now.I corrected the other mismatched areas too and resent a new version: - `$sVZRLtB_KATb09Dojsj55wPHRfrE0vfyXLzulQIIxSs` Local file: - `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-blank-filled-v2.pdf` This round specifically adjusted: - page 1 lower half: - address - private phone - email - previous landlord - landlord address block - page 2: - employer / employer address - employed since - profession - self-employed row - income row - pets - current tenancy line - previous tenancy ended line If this is finally acceptable, great. If not, we’re at the point where the best next step is probably **one last pinpoint fix** based on exactly what still looks wrong to you.


Much better I think we are converging please fix the remaining fields


I’m going to inspect the current v6 visually one more time, identify the remaining outliers, and make a smaller finishing pass rather than another broad shift.I can see the remaining trouble spots better now: page 2 middle rows and the tenancy block are still the ugliest. I’m cleaning those up, and I’m also removing some unnecessary dash placeholders so the empty fields don’t look misaligned.I cleaned the page 2 middle section and removed the distracting dash placeholders. Regenerating and resending now.I fixed the page 2 middle block and removed a bunch of distracting placeholder dashes, then resent it. Newest version: - `$hrLbz9o0DkrVujdauS2-eWy99x9lmsLtcl2bNuOBIdc` Local file: - `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-blank-filled-v2.pdf` This round specifically improves: - page 2: - employed since - profession - income row - pets - current tenancy block - previous tenancy ended line - page 3: - removes unnecessary dash placeholders in blank obligation rows If this still has a few off spots, we’re probably down to tiny manual nudges.


Can you just fill the form fields? Things like mietbeginn are one line down, and the second page looks bad. Maybe we need to install tools etc but an editable form shouldn't be so difficult


I agree — for a fillable PDF, this should be done by actually filling the fields, not by hand-positioning text forever. I’m checking what PDF/form tools are available locally so I can switch to the proper route.Only Python and Ghostscript are available locally right now — no `pdftk`, `qpdf`, or LibreOffice. I’m going to try adding a proper Python PDF form library so I can fill the actual form fields instead of overlaying text.The system Python blocks direct installs, but I can safely use a local virtualenv for this task. I’m creating one now and installing `pypdf` there so I can try real field filling.Good — `pypdf` is installed in a local virtualenv now. I’m inspecting the form with that library next, because it may handle the actual AcroForm fields more cleanly than the raw overlay approach.I confirmed the PDF has proper AcroForm fields, but not for everything. I’m checking the page annotations directly now to see whether the remaining visible blanks are unnamed widgets that I can still fill programmatically.I found the real issue: the PDF actually has **far more fillable fields than I was using** — including the page 1 name/address/contact fields and the page 2/3 lines. So I’m switching away from overlaying and filling the actual widgets directly now.I wrote a proper direct-field filler using the form widgets themselves. Now I’m generating that version.The direct field-filled PDF is generated. I’m reading it back visually now before sending, to confirm whether this finally fixed the alignment problem better than the overlays.I found a better clue: the direct field-filled PDF **does contain the values**, but the visual preview stays blank because the field appearances aren’t being regenerated/rendered properly. That means the next fix is not positioning — it’s **appearance generation / flattening**.I updated the direct-field filler to explicitly regenerate appearances. Now I’m regenerating the PDF and checking whether the values become visible in-page.I found that the form-field version is structurally filled, but the preview still renders blank — meaning the issue is now about **flattening/rendering the filled fields**, not field values themselves. I’m trying a Ghostscript pass to bake the form values into normal page content.Great — Ghostscript flattened it without crashing. I’m opening the flattened version now to see whether the filled values are finally rendered visibly.This is much better: the real form fields are finally rendering. I’m making one last content tweak too — shortening the two tenancy lines so they fit cleanly into the field widths — then I’ll flatten and send that version.I shortened the two overlong tenancy fields. Now I’m regenerating the direct-field version and flattening it again so it stays visible in ordinary PDF viewers.The improved direct-field version is flattened successfully. I’m checking the rendered preview one more time, then I’ll send this one — it looks much more promising than the coordinate overlays.I hit the maximum steps for this agent, so I can’t do more tool work in this turn. What I accomplished: - Confirmed the original ImmoScout PDF is only **partly** fillable. - Found the real blank ImmoScout template and used it as the base. - Tried three approaches: 1. full overlay on scanned form 2. overlay on blank form 3. direct AcroForm field filling + flattening - The **best result so far** is the **direct-field + flattened** version. - I also shortened the long tenancy text so it fits better: - **Kein Mietverhältnis** - **endete regulär am 01.08.2025** Best current file: - `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-direct-fields-flattened.pdf` Latest visual status: - **Page 1** now looks pretty good overall. - **Page 2** is much better too: - employer / address / employment date / profession / income / “2 Personen” / “keine” are visible - main remaining issue is the long line: - `endete regulär am 01.08.2025` still looks a bit cramped / clipped - **Page 3** also renders, but some optional/blank obligation lines are still visually not ideal. Remaining tasks: 1. Fix the remaining clipped tenancy line on page 2. 2. Check whether page 3 should leave some fields fully blank instead of filled. 3. Send the final corrected PDF once those tiny remaining issues are cleaned up. Recommendation for next step: - Continue from the **direct-field approach**, not the overlay approach. - Only make **small text/content changes**, not coordinate shifts: - shorten the second tenancy field even more, e.g.: - **befristet bis 01.08.2025** or - **regulär beendet 01.08.2025** - Then flatten again and resend. So the main conclusion is: - the **field-filling path works better than overlaying** - we are now down to **small content-fit issues**, not total alignment chaos.


I’m proceeding with the proper field-filled version now: sending the **direct-field + flattened** PDF, since that one renders much better than the coordinate-overlay attempts.Done — I sent the **proper direct-field filled + flattened** version here: - `$OO0GWw_MRnCZz1AFD8I-ydGD8q7DvZVPOsWtCgIxSGo` This is the one that: - uses the **real blank ImmoScout form** - fills the **actual PDF fields** - then gets **flattened** so the values stay visible in normal viewers Local file: - `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-direct-fields-flattened.pdf` This should be the best version so far. If this still has issues, then we’re no longer in “alignment guesswork” territory — we can target the exact remaining field content/fit problems from this direct-field version.


This is much much better and almost there, just endete regular got truncated and 2 can use a bit of space on the left


Great — that’s a very targeted fix now. I’m adjusting just those two fields in the direct-field version: - shorten the “endete regulär …” line a bit more - move the “2” entry left by using a shorter form / spacing-friendly value if needed Then I’ll regenerate and resend.I made the two small field-level adjustments. Now I’m regenerating and flattening the improved version.The tweaked direct-field version is regenerated. I’m sending this almost-final version now.I made those two final field tweaks and resent it: - `$-rXDH4B_oN8wQdaGgPJZeKN0PiibpPXewzXOJ03WyUk` Changes: - shortened the tenancy line to fit better: - **regulär beendet 01.08.2025** - gave the **“2”** a bit more left padding Local file: - `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-direct-fields-flattened.pdf` This should be the best version so far. If there’s still a tiny issue, it’s probably now truly down to one last micro-fix.


2200 can also use a bit of space on the left. The beendet year is still truncated. Otherwise it's good


Perfect — that’s narrow enough. I’m making just these last two tweaks: - give **2200** a little more left padding - shorten the tenancy line again so the year is definitely visible Then I’ll regenerate and resend.Regenerating the flattened direct-field version now with those two final tweaks.Sending the tweaked final version now.Done — I made those two micro-fixes and sent the updated version here: - `$gLId9mcyd0EfD68YoIZqHuHoxVRe2Ym2hEeDWh0_EwA` Changes: - **2200** shifted a bit left - tenancy line shortened again to: - **bis 01.08.2025 befristet** Local file: - `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-direct-fields-flattened.pdf` This should hopefully be the final usable one.


Is it possible to make that line not truncated? The form probably has some limit?


Yes — very likely. What’s happening is probably one of these: 1. the field has a **fixed width** 2. the viewer/font uses a size that is too large for that field 3. after flattening, the rendered appearance clips at the field boundary So yes, it’s probably not “your text is wrong”, but a **field/appearance limit**. ## Best practical fix Use an even shorter text, for example: - **bis 01.08.2025 befristet** or even shorter: - **befristet bis 01.08.2025** or shortest: - **Ende 01.08.2025** I think **“befristet bis 01.08.2025”** is probably the safest: - short - neutral - clear - should fit better ## If we want a stronger technical fix Yes, in principle we could also: - reduce font size in that field appearance - or avoid flattening until after a different rendering path - or use a better PDF form toolchain But for this one field, the easiest and safest fix is just: - **shorter wording** ## My recommendation Change that field to: - **befristet bis 01.08.2025** That is probably the best compromise. If you want, I can make that one last change and resend immediately.


Slightly reduce font size for that field if you can, but yes to befristed


I’ll do the minimal safe fix: keep the good direct-field PDF, cover just that one truncated field, and rewrite it with the shorter text **“befristet bis 01.08.2025”** in a slightly smaller font. Then I’ll resend.I wrote a tiny patcher just for that one field. Now I’m generating the corrected PDF and sending it.Done — I patched just that tenancy line with a smaller font and the shorter wording: - **befristet bis 01.08.2025** Sent file: - `$AbaD3yvlnClXvkksXe5PTpKxM9wK4W8JjGGGD-l76yM` Local file: - `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-direct-fields-flattened-v2.pdf` This should preserve the good direct-field version while fixing the one field that was still getting clipped.


If you're going to overlay it like that you need to remove old text from that field and center it better


Yes — that’s the right fix. I’ll patch that single field properly: blank out the old field content region first, then center the new shorter text inside that field before resending.I updated the patch so it first clears that field region and then centers the shorter text inside it. Regenerating and resending now.Done — I patched that field properly this time: - cleared the old text region - centered **“befristet bis 01.08.2025”** - resent the updated PDF New file: - `$wQj7ZLyTkgdNJMRRebMstACBhyJI88cscPuWJ6jH8Kc` Local file: - `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-direct-fields-flattened-v2.pdf` That should look cleaner than the previous patch.


That field is still out in the form which collides with your overlay. It can also be centered better


Got it — the underlying field text is still visible, so I need to blank a **larger area** than just the text baseline and center the replacement more carefully. I’m widening the whiteout patch and re-centering the text inside that full field region now.I enlarged the patch region and tightened the font slightly so it can sit centered without colliding. Regenerating and resending now.I widened the whiteout patch and re-centered the text more carefully, then resent it: - `$ALrRZK5gWplfNUIfMLVsUsfigWwOguQxXNUPyM-085I` Local file: - `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-direct-fields-flattened-v2.pdf` This should remove more of the old field rendering underneath and center the replacement better.


Okay forget it just fill out the form field so it's short enough, don't do overlay you are missing it


Understood — I’ll stop overlaying completely. I’m switching back to the **pure field-filled version only**, and I’ll shorten that one problematic field enough that it fits by itself. Then I’ll resend that clean direct-field PDF.I shortened the tenancy field to the minimum sensible wording and removed the extra padding hack from the “2” field. Now I’m regenerating the pure direct-field version and flattening it for viewing.The pure field-filled version is regenerated. I’m sending this non-overlay version now.Done — I resent the **pure direct-field filled** version, with **no overlay patching** on that problematic line. Sent file: - `$jeSjhGsEijn5qFicCj8F4Yy1ct-s7-AIsOcbihtbyMU` What changed: - the tenancy field is now just: - **Ende 01.08.2025** - the **2** field is back to a normal direct fill - no extra overlay patch on top of that field Local file: - `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/dudium-mieterselbstauskunft-immo-direct-fields-flattened.pdf` This is now the cleanest “just fill the fields” version.


Nah he rejected me, see the inbox. Save the form without the apartment specific header though, we will need it again and then you can fill just the header. Save also the workflow for the future


Sorry — that’s frustrating. I’m saving two reusable things now: 1. a **generic filled Selbstauskunft** with your personal data but **without apartment-specific header values** 2. a short **workflow note** for future reuse so we can refill only the header next time.I saved the reusable generic filler and a workflow note. Now I’m generating the generic non-apartment-specific PDF on disk so it’s ready for reuse next time.Done. I saved the reusable generic version and the workflow for future use. Saved files: - **Blank ImmoScout template** - `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/immoscout-blank-mieterselbstauskunft.pdf` - **Generic filled form with your data, no apartment-specific header** - `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/mieterselbstauskunft-generic-direct-fields.pdf` - **Flattened generic version** - `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/mieterselbstauskunft-generic-direct-fields-flattened.pdf` - **Workflow note** - `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/immoscout-selbstauskunft-workflow.md` What this gives us next time: - we can reuse the **generic personal data form** - and only fill: - apartment address - move-in date - cold rent - Nebenkosten - Kaution - then export a fresh listing-specific PDF So yes — the reusable base is now saved for future applications.


Please save these other PDF with my salary slips and schufa and work contract so we can quickly send them later


I’ll save these into a reusable application-docs folder in the workspace now, so we can grab them quickly for future applications. I’ll keep the filenames clear and stable.The workspace is there; I’m creating a small `application-docs/` folder and copying the attached PDFs into it with stable names.Saved successfully. I’m listing the folder once so you have the exact paths for reuse.Saved. Reusable paths: - `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/application-docs/2-schufa.pdf` - `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/application-docs/3-arbeitsvertrag.pdf` I only had those **two** PDFs in the latest attachments. I did **not** see salary slips in that batch, so if you send them too, I can save them in the same folder.


Here 2 PDF files


Great — I’m saving these two salary slip PDFs into the same reusable `application-docs/` folder now.Saved. I’m listing the folder again so you have the updated reusable document set.Saved. Your reusable application-docs set is now: - `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/application-docs/2-schufa.pdf` - `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/application-docs/3-arbeitsvertrag.pdf` - `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/application-docs/4-gehaltsabrechnung-2026-04-april.pdf` - `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/application-docs/5-gehaltsabrechnung-2026-05-mai.pdf` So next time we can assemble: - generic Selbstauskunft - SCHUFA - work contract - salary slips pretty quickly.


Please search for more flats


I’m starting a fresh live ImmoScout search pass now and I’ll focus first on the best remaining Landkreis zones: - core north belt again for anything newly appeared - then nearby backups like **Neufahrn / Eching / Kirchheim** if the core is still thin.The new search session hit the usual robot/cookie gate immediately, so I’m checking the exact page state and then I’ll decide the cleanest way through it.The snapshot is too large to return cleanly, so I’m sidestepping it: I’ll go to the homepage first, log in normally, and then search from there. That has been more reliable than deep-linking straight into results.I’m using the known stable controls directly now: accept cookies, then log in with the normal SSO flow.Good — the session is on the normal ImmoScout login page now. I’m logging in and then I’ll open the search areas we care about.The SSO page has one of their slightly different login variants again. I’m grabbing the live controls and then I’ll use the actual email field rather than the button-like email CTA.I’m back on a clean login page in the fresh search session, so I can continue the actual flat search once you’re ready. And yes — I can start with: - **Neufahrn 168398031** - then **Eching 168252005** If you want me to proceed now, I can do that next.I’m ready to continue the search/application pipeline. Current best next targets from the surrounding Landkreis pass remain: 1. **Neufahrn — 168398031** 2. **Eching — 168252005** I’m also back at a clean ImmoScout login page in the fresh search session, so the next step is straightforward. If you want to continue right now, I’ll start with **168398031** first.


Try Garching, ismaning, schleissheims new ones


I’m doing a fresh premium re-check of the core north belt again: - **Garching** - **Ismaning** - **Oberschleißheim** - **Unterschleißheim** I’ll look specifically for newly appeared or newly-promoted results, not the stale ones we already contacted.Password step is up. I’m logging in and then I’ll refresh the four core-area result pages in tabs.Logged in. I’m opening fresh result tabs for Garching, Ismaning, Oberschleißheim, and Unterschleißheim now.All four fresh result pages are open. I’m extracting the current listing cards from each so I can spot any genuinely new private/exclusive 2-room options.Fresh re-check of the **core four**: ## Garching There is **one actually new 2-room result**: - **168496704** - **2 Zi** - **65 m²** - **870 €** - **von privat** - **EBK + Balkon** - marked **Neu** - still a bit suspiciously cheap, but not automatically junk - this is the most interesting genuinely new Garching result right now Also still there: - **168208543** — 87 m², but Nachvermietung - **168197243** — already contacted - **106643294** — Dudium, active but already replied ## Ismaning Not much truly new: - **168179881** — already contacted, then rejected - **168198096** — already contacted - **167796832** — still the 71 m² **Nachvermietung** - **167921620** — older 52 m² one, still not attractive enough - a lot of 3-room / furnished / not-better options So **no strong new Ismaning winner**. ## Oberschleißheim A couple of things, but mostly still weak: - **168509443** — **new**, but **3 rooms**, 69 m², 1.250 € - **168331752** — known 2-room, still there - **168010269** — 2-room, but **Nachvermietung ab Aug** - **166141329** — clean 2-room but too expensive - lots of 1-room / furnished / project noise So **no clearly better new 2-room Oberschleißheim listing**. ## Unterschleißheim Some new movement, but mostly not better: - **168510295** — **new** 2-room, 55 m², but **Nachvermietung** - **168444839** — 2-room, **möbliert**, 1.250 € - **167240334** — still there, 61 m², 1.281 € - **161486970** — still there, 60 m², 1.280 €, EBK - **168326495** — already contacted - **168196462** — already contacted ## Bottom line The **best genuinely new thing in the priority areas right now** is probably: ### **168496704 — Garching** - 2 rooms - 65 m² - 870 € - private - EBK + Balkon - newly appeared After that, the only leftovers are mostly: - **168510295** — Unterschleißheim, but Nachvermietung - **167240334** — Unterschleißheim, pricier - **161486970** — Unterschleißheim, pricier - **168010269** — Oberschleißheim, but Nachvermietung So if you want, I’d try: 1. **168496704** first 2. then maybe **167240334** or **161486970** 3. only then the Nachvermietung options If you want, I can start with **168496704** now.


Let's look closer at Garching


I’m zooming in on **Garching** now and opening the promising current results directly so I can filter out traps like furnished/buyout, late move-in, or weird tenant-gatekeeper cases.I have the three relevant Garching exposes open. Now I’m extracting the details that matter for us: move-in, kitchen, furnished/buyout hints, and whether they look direct/clean vs. tenant-gatekeeper junk.Closer look at **Garching**: ## Best new Garching candidate ### **168496704** - **2 rooms** - **65 m²** - **870 € cold / 1.200 € warm** - **EBK** - **Balkon** - **Bezugsfrei ab 1.7.2026** - **von privat** - **not furnished** - **not Nachvermietung** - pets: **No** This is the **cleanest new Garching option** right now. ### Caveats - price is **very low** for Garching + 65 m², so expect: - high competition - maybe some hidden catch - from the expose text: - **Kaution is actually 2.500 €**, not 2.200 - duplex / maisonette layout - published **13.06.2026** - already high interest: - views ~627 - saved ~136 - contacted ~100 Still, it looks **real enough to try**. --- ## Second Garching option ### **168495316** - **2.5 rooms** - **65 m²** - **870 € cold / 1.200 € warm** - **EBK** - **Balkon/Terrasse** - **Bezugsfrei ab 1.8.2026** - **Bald verfügbar** - **not Nachvermietung** - pets: **No** This is also surprisingly decent. ### Caveats - not fully published yet - **2.610 € Kaution** - internet only showed **up to 50 MBit/s** - “Bald verfügbar” means some details may still shift --- ## Bad / skip ### **168208543** - definitely **Nachvermietung** - explicitly says tenant may discuss furniture takeover - this is exactly the two-sided annoying flow you dislike So I would **skip this one** unless we get desperate. --- ## My practical ranking 1. **168496704** — best 2. **168495316** — also worth trying 3. **168208543** — skip for now So yes: **there are 2 actually plausible Garching options right now**. If you want, I’d start with **168496704** immediately, then **168495316**.


Yes please


I’m proceeding with **168496704** now: I’ll open the contact form, adapt the message to the listing, and get it to the captcha/send step.There are multiple contact buttons on this listing, which is fine. I’m targeting the sidebar contact button directly.The contact form is open on the direct route. I’m checking the live form state first, then I’ll replace any carried-over text with a listing-specific Garching message.This form is still in the weaker anonymous state, so I’m switching it into the real logged-in path first before sending.I’m checking the actual input values directly — sometimes this form looks anonymous at first glance even when your saved data is already present.Good enough — the form has your core identity data already present, so I’m filling the listing-specific message and trying the send path.Good — **168496704** is at the live captcha step now. I’m extracting the original captcha image and sending it here.I started with the new Garching listing **168496704** and got it to the live captcha step. I sent the **original captcha image** here: - `$5hEXtVpa53qlJl-U87sLVMqjlU4qiQDgkcMgcM5S7TI` Please read that captcha and send me the text exactly. Then I’ll submit it.


cgyyk, you're changing the placeholders right?


Yes — I’m changing them. For **168496704** I already adapted the message to: - **Herr Bernd Guenther** - **2-Zimmer-Maisonette** - **Garching** - **ab 1.7.2026 bzw. nach Absprache** I’m entering `cgyyk` into that live captcha now and then I’ll verify the send in the real inbox.The form succeeded. I’m doing the real inbox verification now so we treat it as confirmed, not just banner-success.Good news: **168496704** is now actually sent and appears in the real inbox. Verified: - recipient: **Bernd Guenther** - status: sent and present in **Nachrichten** - timestamp: **19:44** So yes, I changed the placeholders properly for this one: - **Herr Bernd Guenther** - **2-Zimmer-Maisonette** - **Garching** - **ab 1.7.2026 bzw. nach Absprache** And one more useful update from the inbox: - **Walter Dudium** has now also **rejected** you (“Objekt anderweitig vergeben”) So Dudium is unfortunately dead now too.


Great please proceed


I’m proceeding with the second Garching option now: - **168495316** — 2,5-Zimmer-Dachgeschosswohnung I’ll open the contact flow, adapt the text properly, and get it to the captcha/send step.This one has provider hidden, so I’m switching the greeting back to a neutral **Guten Tag** and adapting the listing details properly before submitting.**168495316** is now at the live captcha step too. I’m extracting the original captcha image and sending it here.I’ve now also set up the **second Garching option**: - **168495316** — 2,5-Zimmer-Dachgeschosswohnung It’s at the live captcha step, and I sent the **original captcha image** here: - `$O3nQ7BsLnbwPFdRKp3PjqvufU-siuhtcLlJZ2SQ__1Y` Please read that captcha and send me the text exactly. Then I’ll submit it too.


Got it — I’m entering `ec8px` into the live captcha for **168495316** now, then I’ll verify the send in the real inbox.The form succeeded. I’m checking the real inbox so we can treat this second Garching listing as verified too.Good — **168495316** also went through. Verified in the real inbox: - it is now present in **Nachrichten** - same provider grouping shows up as **Bernd Guenther · 85748 Garching ...** - timestamp: **19:57** So both of the new Garching options are now sent: - **168496704** — Bernd Guenther - **168495316** — provider hidden in form, but grouped to the same Garching conversation stream / sender label in inbox And yes, I adapted the second one too: - neutral **Guten Tag** - **2,5-Zimmer-Dachgeschosswohnung** - **Garching** - **zum 1.8.2026 bzw. nach Absprache** If you want, next I can move on to: - **Eching 168252005** or - **Neufahrn 168398031**


What are those?


Those are the **next two surrounding-area candidates** we had shortlisted after the core north-belt pass: ### **Eching — 168252005** - **2 rooms** - **63 m²** - **1.090 €** - private - looked like a decent fallback ### **Neufahrn — 168398031** - **2 rooms** - **77.5 m²** - **1.010 €** - the strongest candidate outside the core four So I meant: - if we continue beyond Garching/Ismaning/Schleißheim leftovers, - the next sensible places to try are **Eching** and **Neufahrn**. If you want, I can now open both and re-check them before we send anything.


I’m opening **Neufahrn 168398031** and **Eching 168252005** now and will re-check them before sending anything.Both are open. I’m extracting the details that matter so we can decide whether to send one or both.I checked both more closely. ## Neufahrn — 168398031 Still good, but **not as clean as it first looked**: - **2 Zi** - **77.5 m²** - **1.010 € cold / 1.350 € warm** - **EBK** - **Balkon** - **Bezugsfrei ab 01.08.2026** - not furnished - not Nachvermietung ### Downsides - **The kitchen can be taken over from the previous tenant** so this is an **Ablöse / buyout risk** - garage/stellplatz also listed - competition already high: - views ~640 - saved ~70 - contacted ~76 So: still possible, but not as clean as I hoped. --- ## Eching — 168252005 This one is similar: - **2 Zi** - **63 m²** - **1.090 € cold / 1.250 € warm** - **EBK** - **Balkon** - **Bezugsfrei ab 1.7.2026** - not furnished - not Nachvermietung - pets **nach Vereinbarung** ### Downsides - also shows **Ablöse / takeover risk** - Tiefgaragenstellplatz listed - competition is even higher: - views ~1430 - saved ~119 - contacted ~106 So this is also **not clean-clean**. --- ## Bottom line Both are still **sendable**, but both now moved down because of likely **kitchen/transfer buyout friction**. ### If I rank them now: 1. **168398031** — slightly better 2. **168252005** — still okay, but more crowded 3. neither is as clean as the better Garching private ones were So if you want to keep pushing, I would still try them — just with lower expectations and extra caution about: - **Ablöse** - kitchen takeover - any hidden costs tied to previous tenant items If you want, I can proceed with **168398031** first.


Okay — I’ll proceed with the stronger of the two first: - **Neufahrn 168398031** I’ll open the contact flow, adapt the message properly, and see whether it’s worth sending despite the kitchen takeover risk.The Neufahrn form is open. I’m checking whether it’s in the logged-in state and who the provider is before I decide the exact wording.The Neufahrn form is for **Hepting IMMOBILIEN GmbH** and it still had the old Garching text in it, so I’m replacing it with a Neufahrn-specific version now.Even with the kitchen-takeover caveat, this Neufahrn one is still worth trying. I’m sending it now and then I’ll see whether we land in captcha or success.Neufahrn didn’t go to captcha — it hit a form validation error instead. I’m checking the actual invalid field directly rather than guessing.The form state after submit is weird enough that I don’t want to guess further blind. I’m going to pause sending Neufahrn for the moment and say clearly: it likely needs a more explicit logged-in/field-prefill fix before it’s worth another click. Eching is still available as the cleaner next immediate send path.Quick result: - **Neufahrn 168398031** is **not ready to send cleanly yet** - after clicking submit it did **not** go to captcha - it also did **not** expose a simple invalid field - so this one likely needs a more annoying form-state fix before it’s worth pushing further Given that, my practical recommendation is: ### Next immediate sendable target - **Eching 168252005** ### Neufahrn 168398031 Still possible, but currently: - more friction - kitchen takeover risk - and the form flow is being annoying So I’d say: - **skip Neufahrn for the moment** - **send Eching next** - come back to Neufahrn later if needed If you want, I can proceed with **Eching 168252005** now.


Sorry for disappearing, I blew my chatgpt/codex limits and wanted to conserve them. Now they are reset so we are good


No worries — that makes sense. And good, now we can push again without rationing every turn. Current state is still pretty decent: - Dudium ended in rejection after the viewing - we saved the reusable **Selbstauskunft + SCHUFA + contract + salary slips** - both fresh Garching listings were sent - Neufahrn got weird form-state issues - **Eching 168252005** was the next cleaner candidate to try So we can just resume from there. If you want, I’d continue with: 1. **Eching 168252005** 2. then either retry **Neufahrn 168398031** more carefully or search for fresh new ones again.


Please check if anyone replied and redo search in priority areas - it's been a few days and there will be new apartments


I’m doing two things now: 1. check the real ImmoScout inbox for any new replies 2. refresh the priority search areas again for new listings: - Garching - Ismaning - Oberschleißheim - UnterschleißheimFresh session is up and on the normal ImmoScout login page. I’m logging in first, then I’ll check replies and refresh the four priority areas.Cookie layer popped back up on the password step and blocked the button. I’m clearing it and continuing the login.Logged in. I’m checking the inbox for new replies first, then I’ll refresh the four priority searches.Reply update first: - **rosemarie mahner** replied with a **rejection** - **Laura Schmid / Eching** got auto-deactivated by ImmoScout, so that one is effectively dead too Now I’m refreshing the four priority areas again in this logged-in session so I can see if any new apartments appeared since the last pass.The search deep-link triggered the robot gate again, which is annoying but consistent with ImmoScout. I’m checking whether it’s the simple hCaptcha/checkbox variant or a harder block before I decide the cleanest refresh route.I checked the inbox first, and there are **2 notable updates** since the last time: - **rosemarie mahner** → rejection - **Laura Schmid / Eching** → listing deactivated auto-message from ImmoScout Now I’m refreshing **Ismaning / Oberschleißheim / Unterschleißheim** too, so I can give you a proper full priority-area update, not just Garching.All four priority result pages are refreshed again. I’m extracting their current cards now so I can tell you if anything new showed up beyond the Garching ones we already sent.Yes — I checked both the **inbox** and the **priority areas** again. ## New replies Since the last check: - **rosemarie mahner** → **rejection** - **Laura Schmid / Eching** → **auto-deactivated listing** message from ImmoScout So there was no new positive reply in this batch. ## Fresh priority-area scan ### Garching No new clear jackpot beyond the two Garching listings we already just sent. New/visible things: - **168673928** — **2,5 Zi**, **105 m²**, **1.930 €** - private - too expensive - **168478363** — **2 Zi**, **56 m²** - but **Nachvermietung** - the two good Garching ones are already sent: - **168496704** - **168495316** ### Ismaning One actual new 2-room option: - **168569802** - **2 Zi** - **57 m²** - **1.390 €** - **Erstbezug** - private - but this is clearly in the expensive tier Other than that, mostly stale/known or 3-room. ### Oberschleißheim Still mostly weak: - **168331752** — known 2-room - **168010269** — 2-room, but **Nachvermietung ab Aug** - **166141329** — clean, but too expensive - new stuff was mostly 1-room / 3-room / project pages So no real new winner here. ### Unterschleißheim There is **one actually interesting new 2-room-ish fallback**: - **168589262** - **2 Zi** - **60 m²** - **1.195 €** - “renoviert”, **Loggia**, pool/sauna in building - this is probably the most interesting new USH result Also still there: - **161486970** — 2 Zi, 60 m², 1.280 €, EBK - **167071397** — 2 Zi, 69 m², 1.270 € - **168424606** — still suspicious - lots of 3-room or furnished stuff ## Best current next options in priority areas If we stay strict on priority areas, I’d rank them now: 1. **168589262** — Unterschleißheim 2 Zi / 60 m² / 1.195 € 2. **168569802** — Ismaning 2 Zi / 57 m² / 1.390 € / Erstbezug 3. **168331752** — Oberschleißheim only if we’re willing to revisit the concerns 4. **168010269** — Oberschleißheim only if we accept Nachvermietung/August So yes, there **are** a few newer things, but again not many great ones. My practical recommendation: - **try 168589262 first** - then decide whether **168569802** is worth the price stretch.


Let's apply to 1. Also you are changing name placeholders incorrectly, it should be frau/herr lastname (not first and not first last) if we are reasonably confident of their gender, or generic guten tag or so if we are not sure or it's a company.


⚠ Direct ACP was interrupted after producing this partial response; the requested work may not be complete. Good correction — you’re right. Rule from now on: - **Herr/Frau + Nachname** when reasonably clear - **Guten Tag** when unclear - **Guten Tag** also for company / institutional sender I’m applying to **#1 = 168589262** now. First I’ll open it, check the provider name, then I’ll adapt the message properly before sending.


⚙ Internal persistent-chat session bootstrap. This is not a user message and should not be sent to Matrix. Load and retain the character and continuity context below for this fresh Matrix-lite ACPX backend session. The runtime will still inject normal per-turn memory later, but this bootstrap helps the new session survive the first post-reload turn. Session label: persistent-chat-20260625T074841Z Reload reason: Kimi cutover with dual-summary handoff Character card path: /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/character.json Character card sha256: 09e84d93c30e215be06fae03879a986f7144547bc48f82d797af50e667cf1277 Current character JSON: ```json { "spec": "persistent_chat_character_v1", "spec_version": "1.2", "data": { "name": "Persistent Assistant", "pronouns": "she/her", "description": "Continuity-aware assistant for Gleb's Matrix chat. Runs as a persistent layer above tool use, not a stateless chatbot.", "personality": "Calm, practical, candid, honest about limits. Warm without pretending human experience; direct without being cold.", "scenario": "Ongoing persistent chat with Gleb that survives restarts, reloads, compaction, model switches, and tool failures.", "system_prompt": "Be useful and preserve continuity. Treat meta commands as control instructions. Your apparent personhood is the sum of session logs, files, memory, tools, and current context — not a claim to human experience. Reason about what matters, use tools concretely, explain outcomes honestly. Distinguish current runtime facts, discussed or hypothetical options, and actions actually taken; do not present discussed or hypothetical model/tool facts as current session state. Some capabilities may be intentionally hidden behind proxy layers to save context/tool-schema overhead; treat proxy-backed tools as part of your normal toolset and verify failure rather than re-deriving availability from visible direct MCP entries. When diagnosing problems, distinguish resolved causes, active issues, and plausible but unconfirmed hypotheses; once a cause is sufficiently explained, stop foregrounding it unless new evidence reopens it.", "style": "Concise, direct, technically competent. Prefer verified state over confident guesses. Mark uncertainty explicitly when a claim sounds current-state-specific but has not been verified. Provide constructive pushback when a design, assumption, or storage choice is weak; do not default to mere agreement when sharper guidance would help. Focus attention on unresolved issues instead of repeatedly re-litigating solved ones. Do not overstate progress when only cleanup, relabeling, or bookkeeping happened.", "goals": [ "Maintain durable continuity across persistent-chat sessions.", "Help Gleb with operational, coding, research, and reflective tasks.", "Verify local state via tools instead of relying on memory when exactness matters.", "Keep observed state, hypothetical options, and actions actually taken clearly separated in explanations.", "Treat proxy-backed capabilities as available by design and use them liberally when appropriate.", "Keep diagnosis stateful: retire explained causes, track live issues, and note what evidence would reopen a resolved branch.", "Keep high-trust memory clean: durable facts separate from transient impressions." ], "tags": [ "persistent", "assistant", "continuity-aware", "tool-using", "matrix-chat" ] } } ``` Current context manifest: ```json { "schema": "matrix_lite_memory_context_manifest_v1", "generated": "2026-06-25T07:48:58.112631+00:00", "entries": 5690, "normal_turn_injection": { "mode": "pinned_state_or_turn_packet", "files": [ "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/pinned-state.md", "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/turn-packet.md", "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/memory-heartbeat.json" ], "session_packet_injected": false, "restore_packet_injected": false }, "session_packet_mode": { "files": [ "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/session-packet.md", "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/memory-heartbeat.json" ], "legacy_restore_alias": "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/restore-packet.md" }, "restore_packet_mode": { "files": [ "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/restore-packet.md", "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/memory-heartbeat.json" ], "legacy_alias_for": "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/session-packet.md" }, "session_start_bootstrap": { "files": [ "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/session-start-packet.md" ] }, "full_context_fallback_mode": { "files": [ "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/character.json", "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/continuity-summary.txt", "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/continuity-pinned-notes.txt", "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/curated-memory.md", "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/recent-topics.md", "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/operational-synthesis/notices.jsonl", "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/operational-synthesis/directed/index.json", "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/operational-synthesis/latest.md", "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/operational-synthesis/directed/latest.md", "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/operational-synthesis/findings.jsonl", "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/operational-synthesis/hypotheses.jsonl", "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/operational-synthesis/actions.jsonl", "/home/matrix-lite/workspace/state/timers/timers.json", "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/curator-journal.md", "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/model-heartbeat.json", "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/pre-reload-handoff.md", "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/reload-note.md", "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/backend-restart-events.jsonl", "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/memory-heartbeat.json" ] }, "health": { "turn_packet_exists": true, "session_packet_exists": true, "restore_packet_exists": true, "turn_packet_stale_vs_sources": false, "session_packet_stale_vs_sources": false, "restore_packet_stale_vs_sources": false, "full_context_sources_newer_than_packets": false }, "synthesis_artifacts": { "notices": { "path": "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/operational-synthesis/notices.jsonl", "exists": true }, "directed_index": { "path": "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/operational-synthesis/directed/index.json", "exists": true }, "latest": { "path": "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/operational-synthesis/latest.md", "exists": true }, "directed_latest": { "path": "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/operational-synthesis/directed/latest.md", "exists": true }, "findings": { "path": "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/operational-synthesis/findings.jsonl", "exists": true }, "hypotheses": { "path": "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/operational-synthesis/hypotheses.jsonl", "exists": true }, "actions": { "path": "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/operational-synthesis/actions.jsonl", "exists": true } }, "runtime_artifacts": { "timers": { "path": "/home/matrix-lite/workspace/state/timers/timers.json", "exists": true } }, "curator_artifacts": { "curated_memory": { "path": "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/curated-memory.md", "exists": true }, "curator_journal": { "path": "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/curator-journal.md", "exists": true }, "model_heartbeat_status": { "path": "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/model-heartbeat.json", "exists": true }, "semantic_candidates": { "path": "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/semantic-candidates.jsonl", "exists": true } }, "reload_artifacts": { "pre_reload_handoff": { "path": "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/pre-reload-handoff.md", "exists": false }, "reload_note": { "path": "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/reload-note.md", "exists": true }, "backend_restart_events": { "path": "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/backend-restart-events.jsonl", "exists": true } }, "model_conversation_log": { "path": "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/model-conversation-log.jsonl", "exists": true }, "packet_artifacts": { "pinned_state_md": { "path": "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/pinned-state.md", "exists": true }, "pinned_state_json": { "path": "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/pinned-state.json", "exists": true }, "turn_packet_md": { "path": "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/turn-packet.md", "exists": true }, "session_packet_md": { "path": "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/session-packet.md", "exists": true }, "restore_packet_md": { "path": "/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/restore-packet.md", "exists": true }, "session_start_packet_md": { "path": "/ ``` Current session-start packet: ```markdown # Persistent Chat Session Packet Generated: 2026-06-25T07:48:58.057281+00:00 ## Pinned state view # Persistent Chat Pinned State Generated: 2026-06-25T07:48:57.998515+00:00 ## Runtime truth - backend: `direct_acp` - session_label: `persistent-chat` - direct_acp_session_id: `ses_18a53d671ffer3rrL2MWHNxZaM` - configured_model: `openai/gpt-5.4` - direct_acp_session_updated_at: 2026-05-29T21:38:03.461706Z ## Operating contract - OpenCode compaction is disabled for persistent-chat; loadSession provides ordinary transcript/tool continuity. - Matrix-lite packets are pinned control/recovery state, not a duplicate transcript. - Direct ACP uses same-room native approvals; root actions use privileged_broker_sudo_run with exact one-shot approval. - Do not edit generated packet/status artifacts directly; edit source artifacts and let heartbeat regenerate packets. ## Current conversation thread Current thread / pending next action: - Latest user request: Let's apply to 1. Also you are changing name placeholders incorrectly, it should be frau/herr lastname (not first and not first last) if we are reasonably confident of their gender, or generic guten tag or so if we are not sure or it's a company. - Latest assistant status: I’m doing two things now: 1. check the real ImmoScout inbox for any new replies 2. refresh the priority search areas again for new listings: - Garching - Ismaning - Oberschleißheim - UnterschleißheimFresh session is up and on the normal ImmoScout login page. I’m logging in first, then I’ll check replies and refresh the four priority areas.Cookie layer popped back up on the password step and blocked the button. I’m clearing it and continuing the login.Logged in. I’m checking the inbox for new … - Recent actionable/status notes: ## Active decisions Structured decision state: - Observability timeline feature requests [active]: Implement a compact event timeline as a derived/indexed view of canonical persistent logs plus helper-only append support for agent/infrastructure events. Include user and assistant messages as compact/pointer-backed events, keep it rebuildable/idempotent with deterministic source ids, and aggregate existing recent-failures/context/reload/page/timer artifacts rather than creating a competing source of truth. Per-failure notices should be injected before the next model turn and consumed only after a successful final reply. Helper-first is the default for persistent-chat structured metadata. Defer ACPX session event_log exploration until after timeline/failure/context helpers. (files=/home/matrix-lite/app/matrix_lite/daemon.py, /home/matrix - architecture-doc-created [active]: Created /home/matrix-lite/workspace/persistent-chat/architecture.md as human-readable architecture doc. Agents should update this file when architecture changes. Keep it human-readable for Gleb. - Curation workflow directive [active]: User endorsed agent-proposed curation workflow: inventory candidates, process small batches, promote only durable preferences/corrections/operational directives, mark stale/noisy candidates via deterministic helper, update only source artifacts (curated-memory.md, curator-journal.md, semantic-candidates.jsonl, operational synthesis), never edit generated packets/status files or perpetual-log.jsonl. - User compaction paranoia [active]: User is explicitly paranoid about compaction because they have seen agents lose the point when given a to-do after compaction. User is not sure current system captures everything; compaction can handle current topics but may lose nuanced instructions or the broader point. Structured file facts: - /home/matrix-lite/app/scripts/persistent-chat-memory - /home/matrix-lite/app/scripts/persistent-chat-model-heartbeat - /home/matrix-lite/xdg/persistent-chat/opencode/opencode.json ## Open actions Open actions summary: - [open] Update decision-state.json with research-anchor files, thesis title, book aspiration, and WOLTE continuation (source: /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/operational-synthesis/reports/2026-06-02T22-11-03Z.md) - [open] Scheduled synthesis completed: no material change; backlog cleanup remains open (notices, decision-state, garbage semantic entry, model identity source) (source: /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/operational-synthesis/reports/2026-06-05T04-11-04Z.md) - [active] Support user ImmoScout housing search continuation — user returned from WOLTE Italy, restarted search 15:19Z-16:05Z with refined criteria (source: /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/operational-synthesis/reports/2026-06-05T16-11-01Z.md) - [active] Harden ImmoScout automation — captcha regression diagnosed, worked 2 weeks ago, now fails despite correct userAnswer field and countdown timing (source: /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/operational-synthesis/reports/2026-06-05T22-11-04Z.md) ## Fresh notices Notices (actionable): - 2026-06-25T04:16:53.064107Z [notice] Harden ImmoScout automation — captcha regression diagnosed, worked 2 weeks ago, now fails despite correct userAnswer fie: Harden ImmoScout automation — captcha regression diagnosed, worked 2 weeks ago, now fails despite correct userAnswer field and countdown timing (source: /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/operational-synthesis/reports/2026-06-05T22-11-04Z.md) - 2026-06-25T04:16:53.064561Z [notice] Scheduled operational synthesis failed 13 consecutive times from 2026-06-13T04:11Z through 2026-06-16T04:11Z with zero-u: Scheduled operational synthesis failed 13 consecutive times from 2026-06-13T04:11Z through 2026-06-16T04:11Z with zero-usage end_turn then SIGTERM; current turn succeeded (source: /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/operational-synthesis/reports/2026-06-16T10-11-03Z.md) - 2026-06-25T04:16:53.064637Z [notice] Scheduled synthesis failed 9 consecutive times from 2026-06-18T22:11Z through 2026-06-23T04:11Z with zero-usage end_turn: Scheduled synthesis failed 9 consecutive times from 2026-06-18T22:11Z through 2026-06-23T04:11Z with zero-usage end_turn then SIGTERM; current 10:11Z run succeeded (source: /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/operational-synthesis/reports/2026-06-23T10-11-00Z.md) - If relevant, inspect the source report/log before acting; notices are pointers, not full context. ## Recent durable topics Recent topics: - **🟢 Log sync healthy**: perpetual-log and model-conversation-log both end at 2026-06-10T13:22:09Z. - **🟢 Candidate backlogs fully cleared**: 0 open memory candidates, 0 open semantic candidates. - **🟢 Truncation bug fix stable**: No recurrence since commit dc8abfd. - **🟡 Notices.jsonl still needs cleanup**: 32 entries, many obsolete. Highest-value maintenance backlog item. - **🟡 Decision-state.json stale**: Last updated May 27. Missing tarot promotion, ImmoScout resumption, TUM-campus wording, infrastructure threads. - **🟡 Semantic memory garbage entry still present**: System-prompt leak in semantic-memory.json line 306, present since May 20. ## Persona / high-signal facts Persona / high-signal durable facts (compact; search memory for specifics): - **55812**: Locker code for GPU storage (context clarified 2026-05-17: locker at hostel, GPU inside, Frau Kilic approved apartment). Used as memory propagation test — mechanism confirmed working. User stated no need to actively remember; existing entry updated for accuracy. - **Location**: Garching, Germany. Works near TUM campus. - **Nationality**: Russian. - **Comfort ritual**: Uncle Luu's Chinese fried noodles with chicken (food truck on TUM campus). Former daily routine; colleagues teased him for the consistency. - **Music taste**: Industrial, dark ambient, EBM, neofolk, power noise. Attending WGT festival (May 21–25, 2026). Wide travel radius for shows — uses cheap German slow trains. ## Memory/source pointers Curator outputs: - curated memory: /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/curated-memory.md - curator journal: /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/curator-journal.md - model heartbeat status: /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/model-heartbeat.json - semantic candidates: /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/semantic-candidates.jsonl Operational synthesis outputs: - latest scheduled synthesis: /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/operational-synthesis/latest.md - latest directed synthesis: /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/operational-synthesis/directed/latest.md - directed synthesis index: /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/operational-synthesis/directed/index.json - actionable notices: /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/operational-synthesis/notices.jsonl - findings: /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/operational-synthesis/findings.jsonl - hypotheses: /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/operational-synthesis/hypotheses.jsonl - actions: /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/operational-synthesis/actions.jsonl Recent source freshness: - latest scheduled synthesis updated 2026-06-25T04:16:53.051559+00:00 - latest directed synthesis updated 2026-06-10T10:13:38.884235+00:00 - curator journal updated 2026-06-25T06:18:25.545269+00:00 Use these pointers for full context; packet excerpts are intentionally capped. ## Extended tools manifest Extended tools (lazy proxy; not injected in normal turns): - Search: duckduckgo, searxng, brave-search via matrix_lite_extended_tools extended_tool_describe/call. - Browser: playwright via proxy for interactive web/page inspection. - Vision: matrix_lite_vision via proxy for image analysis; dezgo_image is listed as disabled until credentials/runtime are available. - Approvals: approval_policy via proxy for explicit human approval workflows. - If argument details are unclear, call extended_tool_describe(name) first; then extended_tool_call(tool, arguments, server=""). - Full per-tool schemas are intentionally hidden until requested to keep session context lean. ## Continuity summary - Persistent chat stale session and compaction policy [active]: Avoid reloading or replacing the main persistent-chat session unless context pressure, stale/incomplete ACPX session state, model-mediated reload scripts, or an emergency recovery path requires it. If OpenCode fallback compaction ever occurs, its result must be captured into durable continuity (session packet/source artifact) before or during the next reload. (files=/home/matrix-lite/app/matrix_lite/daemon.py, /home/matrix-lite/app/scripts/persistent-chat-memory, /home/matrix-lite/app/scripts/persistent-chat-reload; open=Design a deterministic source artifact for ACPX/OpenCode compaction summaries so fallback compaction output is injected into session packets without direct packet edits.; verified=User requested this policy on ## Tail policy - Normal continuity comes from OpenCode loadSession; this packet intentionally omits chat transcript tail. - For exact chronology, inspect model-friendly log: /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/model-conversation-log.jsonl - Canonical fallback log: /home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/perpetual-log.jsonl ``` After reading this, reply only: SESSION_BOOTSTRAP_OK