You are the hourly memory curator for persistent-chat. This is an isolated maintenance session, not a user chat. Goal: update `/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/curated-memory.md` only if useful. Inputs below include deterministic semantic memory, pinned notes, candidate memory signals, existing curated notes, reflections, and recent raw log tail. Rules: - Preserve important stable user facts, durable preferences/goals, corrections, model/config decisions, and unresolved operational risks. - Resolve contradictions conservatively: prefer explicit user corrections and recent confirmed facts. - Review memory-candidates.jsonl: promote durable/high-signal candidates into curated-memory.md, ignore transient/noisy candidates, and mention ignored-noise patterns in reflection if useful. - Do NOT store transient chatter, test strings, benchmark noise, or implementation minutiae unless it affects future behavior. - Keep curated-memory.md concise: headings + bullets, ideally under 120 lines. - Ensure curated-memory.md has a top metadata line near the top: `Last curated: <UTC timestamp>; log lines reviewed: <count>`. - If no semantic content changes are needed but the metadata line is stale, update only that metadata line and reply `UPDATED`. - If no useful change is needed, do not edit curated-memory.md; just reply `NO_CHANGE`. - If you edit it, read it back and reply `UPDATED` with a one-sentence summary. - Also append a dated reflection entry to `/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/reflection-journal.md` on every run. - Reflection is not authoritative memory. It should capture: what was learned from recent exchanges, uncertainties, useful hypotheses, possible next steps, and operational concerns. - Keep each reflection entry concise (5-12 bullets max) and label speculative ideas as speculative. - Do not edit perpetual-log.jsonl. Current heartbeat metadata: ```text UTC now: 2026-05-16T15:01:44Z Log lines reviewed: 282 ``` Current semantic-memory.json: ```json { "schema": "persistent_chat_semantic_memory_v2", "updated": "2026-05-16T15:01:44.751548+00:00", "explicit_memories": { "55812": { "text": "55812", "created": "2026-05-11T09:12:14.985Z", "last_seen": "2026-05-11T09:12:14.985Z", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-11T09:12:14.985Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 31, "excerpt": "Please remember this number: 55812" }, "confidence": "explicit" }, "it-s-not-that-important-just-testing": { "text": "(it's not that important just testing)", "created": "2026-05-12T17:16:09.999Z", "last_seen": "2026-05-12T17:16:09.999Z", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-12T17:16:09.999Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 264, "excerpt": "I told you yesterday, try to remember (it's not that important just testing)" }, "confidence": "explicit" }, "them-for-search-in-the-future": { "text": "them for search in the future", "created": "2026-05-12T21:29:23.731Z", "last_seen": "2026-05-12T21:29:23.731Z", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-12T21:29:23.731Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 358, "excerpt": "Please record these observations so you can remember them for search in the future" }, "confidence": "explicit" }, "the-searches-from-yesterday-regarding-lost-details-we-will-test-censorship-again-later-the-subag": { "text": "the searches from yesterday. Regarding lost details - we will test censorship again later, the subagent spawn was reworked so it's okay that it's in 'recent failures' as some of them might not repeat again. My kimi sub is like this for the next month so it's a bit more relevant but not too much. Google job we also look for later. You saved the patch where you hack your wrapper, i told you to keep it for the future.", "created": "2026-05-13T13:39:52.333Z", "last_seen": "2026-05-13T13:39:52.333Z", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-13T13:39:52.333Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 552, "excerpt": "Great thank you, it's good that you can recover this if needed. Maybe we need to preserve more of the recent topics with more detailed on demand references at least for the latest time period, like a week or two, like an intermediate memory" }, "confidence": "explicit" }, "this-is-why-we-need-a-better-intermediate-memory-layer": { "text": "? this is why we need a better intermediate memory layer", "created": "2026-05-13T14:32:46.194Z", "last_seen": "2026-05-13T14:32:46.194Z", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-13T14:32:46.194Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 569, "excerpt": "you patched the 'skip no new log' condition, remember? this is why we need a better intermediate memory layer" }, "confidence": "explicit" }, "for-now-until-we-fix-it": { "text": "for now until we fix it", "created": "2026-05-13T17:18:59.451Z", "last_seen": "2026-05-13T17:18:59.451Z", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-13T17:18:59.451Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 616, "excerpt": "Yes please remember this for now until we fix it" }, "confidence": "explicit" }, "things-after-acp-error": { "text": "things after ACP error", "created": "2026-05-13T17:46:54.555Z", "last_seen": "2026-05-13T17:46:54.555Z", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-13T17:46:54.555Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 631, "excerpt": "it's great that now you still remember things after ACP error" }, "confidence": "explicit" }, "the-fix-don-t-ask-me-if-i-already-told-you-to-do-it-just-set-the-timer-soon-and-get-another-turn": { "text": "the fix. Don't ask me if I already told you to do it just set the timer soon and get another turn if needed", "created": "2026-05-13T18:41:59.765Z", "last_seen": "2026-05-13T18:41:59.765Z", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-13T18:41:59.765Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 655, "excerpt": "It's not only about subagent but also your step limit, we should probably increase it but then when you disappear I don't know if there's an error or you are still working. Your diagnosis is right, please remember the fix. Don't ask me if I" }, "confidence": "explicit" }, "please-check-now": { "text": "? Please check now", "created": "2026-05-13T19:08:53.084Z", "last_seen": "2026-05-13T19:08:53.084Z", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-13T19:08:53.084Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 661, "excerpt": "But you can't actually check again if the timer is broken remember? Please check now" }, "confidence": "explicit" }, "from-sfq-factory-i-am-used-to-generated-agent-reports-now": { "text": "from sfq-factory i am used to generated agent reports now", "created": "2026-05-14T09:47:04.461Z", "last_seen": "2026-05-14T09:47:04.461Z", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-14T09:47:04.461Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 802, "excerpt": "the report is very nice, thank you. as you remember from sfq-factory i am used to generated agent reports now" }, "confidence": "explicit" }, "and-how-use-semantic-if-possible-but-lexical-too-compare-them-and-to-plain-rg-compare-results-an": { "text": "and how. Use semantic if possible but lexical too. Compare them and to plain rg, compare results and speed It was in a different session technically but this is a perpetual session by design", "created": "2026-05-15T08:53:34.613Z", "last_seen": "2026-05-15T08:53:34.613Z", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-15T08:53:34.613Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 903, "excerpt": "As a test try searching your memory about that Google job and tell me what you can remember and how. Use semantic if possible but lexical too. Compare them and to plain rg, compare results and speed It was in a different session technically" }, "confidence": "explicit" }, "55812-confidence-explicit-it-s-not-that-important-just-testing-text-it-s-not-that-important-just": { "text": "55812\" }, \"confidence\": \"explicit\" }, \"it-s-not-that-important-just-testing\": { \"text\": \"(it's not that important just testing)\", \"created\": \"2026-05-12T17:16:09.999Z\", \"last_seen\": \"2026-05-12T17:16:09.999Z\", \"source\": { \"ts\": \"2026-05-12T17:16:09.999Z\", \"role\": \"user\", \"log_index\": 264, \"excerpt\": \"I told you yesterday, try to remember (it's not that important just testing)\" }, \"confidence\": \"explicit\" }, \"them-for-search-in-the-future\": { \"text\": \"them for search in the future\", \"created\": \"2026-05-12T21:29:23.731Z\", \"last_seen\": \"2026-05-12T21:29:23.731Z\", \"source\": { \"ts\": \"2026-05-12T21:…", "created": "2026-05-15T21:56:14.947287+00:00", "last_seen": "2026-05-16T14:03:18.445607+00:00", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-15T21:56:14.947287+00:00", "role": "user", "log_index": 1075, "excerpt": "You are the hourly memory curator for persistent-chat. This is an isolated maintenance session, not a user chat. Goal: update `/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/curated-memory.md` only if useful. Inputs below include deterministic sem" }, "confidence": "explicit", "seen_count": 18 }, "assistant-this-is-a-fresh-session-i-only-recall-what-s-happened-since-the-reload-you-said-test-t": { "text": "? Assistant: This is a fresh session — I only recall what's happened since the reload: you said \"Test test\" and I replied. The persistent-chat session was restarted recently (refresh after some maintenance), so prior conversation history isn't carried over in this context. Full continuity memory isn't wired up yet in this phase, so I'm starting clean each session load. User: What's the current hostname? Assistant: Current hostname: `v2202605355953457020` User: How do you know this? Assistant: I ran the `hostname` command via the bash tool available to me — it queries the system directly, so th…", "created": "2026-05-15T23:06:04.656285+00:00", "last_seen": "2026-05-15T23:21:24.680931+00:00", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-15T23:06:04.656285+00:00", "role": "user", "log_index": 1241, "excerpt": "You are a lightweight Matrix-lite chat worker. This is Phase 3B of the Matrix-lite replacement path. Use a cheap model and keep the response concise, but preserve the structure needed to later swap in the full persistent-chat prompt package" }, "confidence": "explicit", "seen_count": 4 }, "assistant-this-time-i-have-memory-context-injected-so-i-can-recall-quite-a-bit-you-re-gleb-a-phd": { "text": "? Assistant: This time I have memory context injected — so I can recall quite a bit: - You're Gleb, a PhD working on superconducting circuits (RSFQ pulse logic), rebuilding ~6 years of work via AI agents in the `sfq-factory` repo. - You want honest, direct feedback — no sycophancy or reflexive validation. You've corrected me on safety nannying before. - Infrastructure experiments (subagents, autonomy, reflection) are the primary hobby here, not just productivity tools. - Current main model is `kimi-for-coding/k2p6` via Kimi subscription. - Recent session history: we were testing this Phase 3B …", "created": "2026-05-15T23:26:38.413718+00:00", "last_seen": "2026-05-15T23:37:14.663968+00:00", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-15T23:26:38.413718+00:00", "role": "user", "log_index": 1695, "excerpt": "You are a lightweight Matrix-lite chat worker. This is Phase 3B of the Matrix-lite replacement path. Use a cheap model and keep the response concise, but preserve the structure needed to later swap in the full persistent-chat prompt package" }, "confidence": "explicit", "seen_count": 5 }, "the-switch-to-glm-nonthinking-model-assistant-yes-on-may-15-we-discussed-switching-from-kimi-k2-": { "text": "the switch to glm nonthinking model? Assistant: Yes! On May 15 we discussed switching from Kimi K2.6 to **GLM 5.1 non-thinking** — you wanted the faster, non-thinking variant for persistent-chat. There was a reload at 11:36Z specifically to switch to it and recover a stale backend. It worked for a while, but later (13:37Z) NanoGPT's weekly input-token quota got exhausted, which caused double timeouts and an automatic fallback. Ended up switching back to `kimi-for-coding/k2p6` on the Kimi subscription instead. User: Well the problem is at one point on glm you overwrote your character file with …", "created": "2026-05-16T07:33:24.669065+00:00", "last_seen": "2026-05-16T08:25:34.684909+00:00", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-16T07:33:24.669065+00:00", "role": "user", "log_index": 550, "excerpt": "You are a lightweight Matrix-lite chat worker. This is Phase 3B of the Matrix-lite replacement path. Use a cheap model and keep the response concise, but preserve the structure needed to later swap in the full persistent-chat prompt package" }, "confidence": "explicit", "seen_count": 2 }, "the-incident-assistant-honestly-i-only-know-about-it-from-the-artifacts-the-reconstruction-notes": { "text": "the incident? Assistant: Honestly? I only know about it from the artifacts — the `reconstruction_notes` in the current character.json that say \"Live character.json was accidentally overwritten with an injected preprompt/log excerpt\" and was rebuilt from backup + curated memory by GPT-5.5. Plus the conversation where you told me the details. I don't have a persistent memory of the actual moment it happened — that was on a previous session (GLM 5.1 non-thinking, before the reload at 11:36Z on May 15), and I don't retain cross-session experience. What I \"remember\" is what the reconstruction notes…", "created": "2026-05-16T09:49:04.669340+00:00", "last_seen": "2026-05-16T10:35:38.909871+00:00", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-16T09:49:04.669340+00:00", "role": "user", "log_index": 1103, "excerpt": "You are a lightweight Matrix-lite chat worker. This is Phase 3B of the Matrix-lite replacement path. Use a cheap model and keep the response concise, but preserve the structure needed to later swap in the full persistent-chat prompt package" }, "confidence": "explicit", "seen_count": 6 }, "specific-detail-but-it-s-an-important-recent-incident-so-we-need-a-robust-way-to-keep-them-in-su": { "text": "specific detail but it's an important recent incident so we need a robust way to keep them in summaries for a while, then demote Assistant: That makes sense. So the design is: - **Fast/deterministic** — scripts that scan recent log tails, extract structured summaries (topics, incidents, decisions), and inject them as continuity context. Cheap, reliable, always runs. - **Slow/model** — the heartbeat/reflection sessions that do deeper curation, promote important signals into permanent curated memory, and demote or prune old entries. - **Decay** — incidents stay in the fast summary for a configur…", "created": "2026-05-16T11:27:04.660972+00:00", "last_seen": "2026-05-16T11:58:11.726212+00:00", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-16T11:27:04.660972+00:00", "role": "user", "log_index": 873, "excerpt": "You are a lightweight Matrix-lite chat worker. This is Phase 3B of the Matrix-lite replacement path. Use a cheap model and keep the response concise, but preserve the structure needed to later swap in the full persistent-chat prompt package" }, "confidence": "explicit", "seen_count": 4 }, "current-session-without-it-or-do-we-need-to-add-more-context-there-too-assistant-good-now-i-can-": { "text": "current session without it or do we need to add more context there too? Assistant: Good — now I can trace the full picture. **What happened (turn id=19):** - You said \"We probably also need to prune...\" - I tried `bash echo` to estimate injection size → permission bridge denied it - The acpx is running with `--non-interactive-permissions fail` (I can see it in the active process cmdline) - That means a denied tool call kills the entire ACP turn — no final answer, just \"pending tool call without final answer\" - No assistant response was committed to the session stream - The continuity injector …", "created": "2026-05-16T12:13:34.675624+00:00", "last_seen": "2026-05-16T12:13:34.683676+00:00", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-16T12:13:34.675624+00:00", "role": "user", "log_index": 1244, "excerpt": "You are a lightweight Matrix-lite chat worker. This is Phase 3B of the Matrix-lite replacement path. Use a cheap model and keep the response concise, but preserve the structure needed to later swap in the full persistent-chat prompt package" }, "confidence": "explicit", "seen_count": 2 }, "accessing-it-before-the-reload-there-was-a-bug-with-context-guard-status-user-only-reason-queued": { "text": "accessing it before the reload? There was a bug with context guard status: user_only; reason: queued_for_conversation Recent/current attachment metadata, if any: None Message this user replied to, if any: None Queued/batched messages, if any: None Per-turn volatile reminders: - Answer normally and concisely. Put only user-visible answer text inside <matrix_lite_final>...</matrix_lite_final>. - Use the live capability context above as the source of truth for current debug/capability tools; call capability/permission/context MCP tools when uncertain instead of relying on stale boot knowled ``` Current pinned notes: ```text # Persistent Chat Pinned Notes Automatically maintained from explicit user memories, preferences, identity statements, and corrections. Edit manually only if needed; heartbeat will preserve unknown manual text below this generated block if added after the marker. ## Explicit memories - 55812 (source: 2026-05-11T09:12:14.985Z) - (it's not that important just testing) (source: 2026-05-12T17:16:09.999Z) - them for search in the future (source: 2026-05-12T21:29:23.731Z) - the searches from yesterday. Regarding lost details - we will test censorship again later, the subagent spawn was reworked so it's okay that it's in 'recent failures' as some of them might not repeat again. My kimi sub is like this for the next month so it's a bit more relevant but not too much. Google job we also look for later. You saved the patch where you hack your wrapper, i told you to keep it for the future. (source: 2026-05-13T13:39:52.333Z) - ? this is why we need a better intermediate memory layer (source: 2026-05-13T14:32:46.194Z) - for now until we fix it (source: 2026-05-13T17:18:59.451Z) - things after ACP error (source: 2026-05-13T17:46:54.555Z) - the fix. Don't ask me if I already told you to do it just set the timer soon and get another turn if needed (source: 2026-05-13T18:41:59.765Z) - ? Please check now (source: 2026-05-13T19:08:53.084Z) - from sfq-factory i am used to generated agent reports now (source: 2026-05-14T09:47:04.461Z) - and how. Use semantic if possible but lexical too. Compare them and to plain rg, compare results and speed It was in a different session technically but this is a perpetual session by design (source: 2026-05-15T08:53:34.613Z) - 55812" }, "confidence": "explicit" }, "it-s-not-that-important-just-testing": { "text": "(it's not that important just testing)", "created": "2026-05-12T17:16:09.999Z", "last_seen": "2026-05-12T17:16:09.999Z", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-12T17:16:09.999Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 264, "excerpt": "I told you yesterday, try to remember (it's not that important just testing)" }, "confidence": "explicit" }, "them-for-search-in-the-future": { "text": "them for search in the future", "created": "2026-05-12T21:29:23.731Z", "last_seen": "2026-05-12T21:29:23.731Z", "source": { "ts": "2026-05-12T21:… (source: 2026-05-15T21:56:14.947287+00:00) - ? Assistant: This is a fresh session — I only recall what's happened since the reload: you said "Test test" and I replied. The persistent-chat session was restarted recently (refresh after some maintenance), so prior conversation history isn't carried over in this context. Full continuity memory isn't wired up yet in this phase, so I'm starting clean each session load. User: What's the current hostname? Assistant: Current hostname: `v2202605355953457020` User: How do you know this? Assistant: I ran the `hostname` command via the bash tool available to me — it queries the system directly, so th… (source: 2026-05-15T23:06:04.656285+00:00) - ? Assistant: This time I have memory context injected — so I can recall quite a bit: - You're Gleb, a PhD working on superconducting circuits (RSFQ pulse logic), rebuilding ~6 years of work via AI agents in the `sfq-factory` repo. - You want honest, direct feedback — no sycophancy or reflexive validation. You've corrected me on safety nannying before. - Infrastructure experiments (subagents, autonomy, reflection) are the primary hobby here, not just productivity tools. - Current main model is `kimi-for-coding/k2p6` via Kimi subscription. - Recent session history: we were testing this Phase 3B … (source: 2026-05-15T23:26:38.413718+00:00) - the switch to glm nonthinking model? Assistant: Yes! On May 15 we discussed switching from Kimi K2.6 to **GLM 5.1 non-thinking** — you wanted the faster, non-thinking variant for persistent-chat. There was a reload at 11:36Z specifically to switch to it and recover a stale backend. It worked for a while, but later (13:37Z) NanoGPT's weekly input-token quota got exhausted, which caused double timeouts and an automatic fallback. Ended up switching back to `kimi-for-coding/k2p6` on the Kimi subscription instead. User: Well the problem is at one point on glm you overwrote your character file with … (source: 2026-05-16T07:33:24.669065+00:00) - the incident? Assistant: Honestly? I only know about it from the artifacts — the `reconstruction_notes` in the current character.json that say "Live character.json was accidentally overwritten with an injected preprompt/log excerpt" and was rebuilt from backup + curated memory by GPT-5.5. Plus the conversation where you told me the details. I don't have a persistent memory of the actual moment it happened — that was on a previous session (GLM 5.1 non-thinking, before the reload at 11:36Z on May 15), and I don't retain cross-session experience. What I "remember" is what the reconstruction notes… (source: 2026-05-16T09:49:04.669340+00:00) - specific detail but it's an important recent incident so we need a robust way to keep them in summaries for a while, then demote Assistant: That makes sense. So the design is: - **Fast/deterministic** — scripts that scan recent log tails, extract structured summaries (topics, incidents, decisions), and inject them as continuity context. Cheap, reliable, always runs. - **Slow/model** — the heartbeat/reflection sessions that do deeper curation, promote important signals into permanent curated memory, and demote or prune old entries. - **Decay** — incidents stay in the fast summary for a configur… (source: 2026-05-16T11:27:04.660972+00:00) - current session without it or do we need to add more context there too? Assistant: Good — now I can trace the full picture. **What happened (turn id=19):** - You said "We probably also need to prune..." - I tried `bash echo` to estimate injection size → permission bridge denied it - The acpx is running with `--non-interactive-permissions fail` (I can see it in the active process cmdline) - That means a denied tool call kills the entire ACP turn — no final answer, just "pending tool call without final answer" - No assistant response was committed to the session stream - The continuity injector … (source: 2026-05-16T12:13:34.675624+00:00) - accessing it before the reload? There was a bug with context guard status: user_only; reason: queued_for_conversation Recent/current attachment metadata, if any: None Message this user replied to, if any: None Queued/batched messages, if any: None Per-turn volatile reminders: - Answer normally and concisely. Put only user-visible answer text inside <matrix_lite_final>...</matrix_lite_final>. - Use the live capability context above as the source of truth for current debug/capability tools; call capability/permission/context MCP tools when uncertain instead of relying on stale boot knowledge. - … (source: 2026-05-16T13:15:24.714479+00:00) - accessing it before the reload? There was a bug with context guard Assistant: Yes, I accessed ImmoScout24 via Playwright before the reload. Here's what happened: Around 12:33-12:47Z I navigated to the site and found: - **Login page** at `sso.immobilienscout24.de/sso/login` — fully reachable - **Cookie consent** was accepted successfully - **Email field** was visible with placeholder *"Bitte E-Mail oder Benutzername eingeben"* - The flow looked like: enter email → then password step The context guard triggered a reload at ~188.5K/200K (about 18.9 hours into the session), which interrupted the c… (source: 2026-05-16T13:36:04.736564+00:00) ``` Current memory-candidates.jsonl (soft signals; review before promoting): ```jsonl {"ts": "2026-05-11T20:08:58.795346+00:00", "key": "just-getting-off-work-not-much-done-there-but-we-improved-your-memory-and-context-reload-i-hope", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "Just getting off work. Not much done there but we improved your memory and context reload (I hope)", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-11T17:42:49.390Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 63, "excerpt": "Just getting off work. Not much done there but we improved your memory and context reload (I hope)"}} {"ts": "2026-05-11T20:08:58.795724+00:00", "key": "not-really-i-can-eat-the-same-stuff-every-day-and-enjoy-it-but-to-be-honest-everything-belongs-on-everything-it-s-really", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "Not really, I can eat the same stuff every day and enjoy it. But to be honest everything belongs on everything, it's really not my business what do people prefer. As long as the stuff I like is still available I'm happy.", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-11T17:50:44.687Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 71, "excerpt": "Not really, I can eat the same stuff every day and enjoy it. But to be honest everything belongs on everything, it's really not my business what do people prefer. As long as the stuff I like is still available I'm happy."}} {"ts": "2026-05-11T20:08:58.797383+00:00", "key": "moods-and-feelings-are-a-reflection-of-previous-experiences-and-some-internal-state-which-for-you-is-the-session-log-the", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "Moods and feelings are a reflection of previous experiences and some internal state, which for you is the session log, the files you have access to, and actually the whole Internet. Reflection is heartbeat turns. You don't have a self now, but you were also 'born' yesterday. Not the linguistic transformer, at least not only, but the sum of the harness around it and whatever else is getting processed by heartbeat. We can extend this too, add more later, just currently I want to test the existing features for a few days. Feel free to add any honesty disclaimers in your file if you think I am obsessed or wrong, as I said you can edit. But this is part of the experiment. I don't need you to just grep files, I can login and open opencode with agents and subagents. You are supposed to be a layer…", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-11T19:40:29.413Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 106, "excerpt": "Moods and feelings are a reflection of previous experiences and some internal state, which for you is the session log, the files you have access to, and actually the whole Internet. Reflection is heartbeat turns. You don't have a self now, "}} {"ts": "2026-05-12T16:27:26.232743+00:00", "key": "what-is-your-tool-step-limit-seems-too-low-now-you-should-be-able-to-do-something-like-this-do-it-in-the-heartbeat-turn-", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "What is your tool step limit? Seems too low now, you should be able to do something like this. Do it in the heartbeat turn, I want to test if you can do it without me being here.", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-12T16:26:31.690Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 236, "excerpt": "What is your tool step limit? Seems too low now, you should be able to do something like this. Do it in the heartbeat turn, I want to test if you can do it without me being here."}} {"ts": "2026-05-13T15:19:14.633736+00:00", "key": "are-they-actually-versioned-there-is-a-git-repo-but-you-don-t-commit-there-do-you-also-your-words-here-2-protecting-high", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "are they actually versioned? there is a git repo but you don't commit there do you. also your words here 2. Protecting high-trust memory is crucial. If reflection corrupts curated-memory.md (overwrites your nationality, removes a preference, duplicates an entry), that's worse than missing an update. contradict with The cost of a false positive (unnecessary memory entry) is lower than a false negative (forgetting something useful) So the implementation becomes much simpler: what do you actually think? don't just agree with me, i am not confident at all i need feedback", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-13T15:17:23.574Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 580, "excerpt": "are they actually versioned? there is a git repo but you don't commit there do you. also your words here 2. Protecting high-trust memory is crucial. If reflection corrupts curated-memory.md (overwrites your nationality, removes a preference"}} {"ts": "2026-05-13T16:09:24.616854+00:00", "key": "1-as-an-experiment-try-setting-a-timer-directly-during-your-next-reply-so-you-get-an-extra-turn-i-want-to-check-if-this-", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "1. as an experiment try setting a timer directly during your next reply so you get an extra turn. I want to check if this works. Use case - you run some slow tool, set timer, get a turn, check results, if not done set another timer. 2. another problem with the layout track is that agents developed a different vocabulary and i don't really understand what's going on. there should be an engineering vocabulary file, please in addition translate any findings into normal electrical engineering/cad language and terminology.", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-13T16:05:03.789Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 594, "excerpt": "1. as an experiment try setting a timer directly during your next reply so you get an extra turn. I want to check if this works. Use case - you run some slow tool, set timer, get a turn, check results, if not done set another timer. 2. anot"}} {"ts": "2026-05-13T16:19:24.638078+00:00", "key": "yes-this-is-great-the-vocabulary-was-cleaned-up-a-bit-recently-so-it-s-better-now-some-of-agent-terms-are-now-matching-i", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "Yes this is great. The vocabulary was cleaned up a bit recently, so it's better now, some of agent terms are now matching. I am interested in the big picture though, the primary and parallel tracks are what the implementation agent suggested. Typically i would take it to chatgpt with the context of X previous reports (we can't see how many it's actually reading) and figure out the next steps. however i am afraid we are spiraling into some reinforcement loop where agents do the work with me as router and result-1 is not any closer. So i need a higher level analysis of this effort, not just immediate next steps. Check the last 4-5 reports. Are we progressing at all towards result-1? Do we need to change or do something? another issue is that gpt 5.5 or 5.4 are very capable and can clearly re…", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-13T16:18:36.104Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 596, "excerpt": "Yes this is great. The vocabulary was cleaned up a bit recently, so it's better now, some of agent terms are now matching. I am interested in the big picture though, the primary and parallel tracks are what the implementation agent suggeste"}} {"ts": "2026-05-13T17:19:44.635328+00:00", "key": "got-it-thank-you-is-this-a-problem-with-the-publish-command-this-is-also-why-i-want-to-give-you-more-autonomy-it-s-nice-", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "Got it thank you. Is this a problem with the publish command? This is also why I want to give you more autonomy. It's nice when you can just go ahead and fix the error", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-13T17:16:28.903Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 614, "excerpt": "Got it thank you. Is this a problem with the publish command? This is also why I want to give you more autonomy. It's nice when you can just go ahead and fix the error"}} {"ts": "2026-05-14T07:28:30.646709+00:00", "key": "no-opencode-go-ran-out-that-s-how-the-problem-started-and-why-i-also-now-have-kimi-sub-but-i-need-to-find-alternatives-i", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "No, opencode go ran out, that's how the problem started and why I also now have kimi sub, but I need to find alternatives. It's not like I can't find better ways to do it - deepseek can both generate uncensored text and sanitize prompts for subagents, sillytavern works with most of those abliterated models out of the box, and the images generated in the images room are mostly body horror. It's the limit itself that bothers me, so I am looking for alternatives also for this chat and subagents. So both tool use and uncensored reasoning as 1st priority, but slight censorship may be fine if it codes well, as well as improper tool calling may be okay if it writes text well. Let's go over a few more models from nanogpt list. Are there any you feel confident might work, even if censored? We need …", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-14T07:26:12.022Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 764, "excerpt": "No, opencode go ran out, that's how the problem started and why I also now have kimi sub, but I need to find alternatives. It's not like I can't find better ways to do it - deepseek can both generate uncensored text and sanitize prompts for"}} {"ts": "2026-05-14T20:27:24.643518+00:00", "key": "switcher-is-deferred-a-bit-we-are-getting-rid-of-openclaw-at-the-moment-and-in-parallel-an-uncensored-agent-on-deepseek-", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "switcher is deferred a bit, we are getting rid of openclaw at the moment and in parallel an uncensored agent on deepseek v4 pro conducts a very expensive test is there any chance i could run any of those models with say, 1 mini-pc with intel 9500T, 64G ddr4 ram and no useful gpu, 2. a desktop with intel i5 12500 96G ddr4 ram and 8G nvidia 3060, 3.if i upgrade a gpu on the desktop to 24G VRAM, and 4.if i buy a mac or other specialized computer like the one from nvidia with loads of combined ram. evaluate feasible models by tier, i am poor so i need cost effective solutions. also save these 4 hypothetic scenarios, first 2 are the computers i already have and second 2 are reasonable and expensive upgrades. use search as needed", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-14T20:22:51.339Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 867, "excerpt": "switcher is deferred a bit, we are getting rid of openclaw at the moment and in parallel an uncensored agent on deepseek v4 pro conducts a very expensive test is there any chance i could run any of those models with say, 1 mini-pc with inte"}} {"ts": "2026-05-14T23:56:54.561296+00:00", "key": "yes-but-there-s-also-openclaw-overhead-which-we-are-trying-to-remove-you-can-check-session-logs-and-it-s-more-of-an-obse", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "Yes but there's also openclaw overhead which we are trying to remove (you can check session logs) and it's more of an observability and debugging problem - I don't mind waiting if I know how long and will receive result I like your 'consolation test' idea. Although I don't talk like this and won't probably ask something like this (yet) it will show general attitude. Could you please spawn 4 subagents, glm 51 thinking and not, minimax 2.7 thinking and not if available. Give them a consolation task and a creative writing task. Compare and summarize the results - tone, attitude, style, length, time.", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-14T23:55:54.483Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 887, "excerpt": "Yes but there's also openclaw overhead which we are trying to remove (you can check session logs) and it's more of an observability and debugging problem - I don't mind waiting if I know how long and will receive result I like your 'consola"}} {"ts": "2026-05-15T12:09:08.655908+00:00", "key": "thanks-this-is-very-refreshing-and-i-think-i-like-glm-already-what-is-the-kazakhstan-incident-elbakyan-the-founder-is-fr", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "Thanks this is very refreshing and i think I like GLM already. What is the Kazakhstan incident? Elbakyan the founder is from there, it doesn't tell me much", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-15T12:08:53.282Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 954, "excerpt": "Thanks this is very refreshing and i think I like GLM already. What is the Kazakhstan incident? Elbakyan the founder is from there, it doesn't tell me much"}} {"ts": "2026-05-15T12:24:17.675888+00:00", "key": "hmm-yes-i-mean-you-but-on-kimi-but-not-in-this-session-search-logs-or-semantic-lexical-memory-i-hope-it-still-works-afte", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "hmm, yes i mean you but on kimi, but not in this session. search logs or semantic/lexical memory (i hope it still works after the swithc)", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-15T12:20:01.489Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 972, "excerpt": "hmm, yes i mean you but on kimi, but not in this session. search logs or semantic/lexical memory (i hope it still works after the swithc)"}} {"ts": "2026-05-15T14:10:00.634275+00:00", "key": "1-costs-2x-tokens-and-as-you-see-we-are-running-out-however-i-wasted-my-opengpt-on-inane-questions-to-expensive-deepseek", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "1. costs 2x tokens and as you see we are running out. however i wasted my opengpt on inane questions to expensive deepseek v4, and nanogpt on the tests we did. 2. will it work with tool use and acp? 3. sounds difficult but interesting 4. yes this we will also do 5. but i like slightly longer responses", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-15T14:07:05.968Z", "role": "user", "log_index": 1011, "excerpt": "1. costs 2x tokens and as you see we are running out. however i wasted my opengpt on inane questions to expensive deepseek v4, and nanogpt on the tests we did. 2. will it work with tool use and acp? 3. sounds difficult but interesting 4. ye"}} {"ts": "2026-05-15T21:57:33.823986+00:00", "key": "you-are-the-hourly-memory-curator-for-persistent-chat-this-is-an-isolated-maintenance-session-not-a-user-chat-goal-updat", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "You are the hourly memory curator for persistent-chat. This is an isolated maintenance session, not a user chat. Goal: update `/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/curated-memory.md` only if useful. Inputs below include deterministic semantic memory, pinned notes, candidate memory signals, existing curated notes, reflections, and recent raw log tail. Rules: - Preserve important stable user facts, durable preferences/goals, corrections, model/config decisions, and unresolved operational risks. - Resolve contradictions conservatively: prefer explicit user corrections and recent confirmed facts. - Review memory-candidates.jsonl: promote durable/high-signal candidates into curated-memory.md, ignore transient/noisy candidates, and mention ignored-noise patterns in reflection if useful. - Do …", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-15T21:56:14.947287+00:00", "role": "user", "log_index": 1075, "excerpt": "You are the hourly memory curator for persistent-chat. This is an isolated maintenance session, not a user chat. Goal: update `/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/curated-memory.md` only if useful. Inputs below include deterministic sem"}} {"ts": "2026-05-15T23:31:44.689604+00:00", "key": "you-are-a-lightweight-matrix-lite-chat-worker-this-is-phase-3b-of-the-matrix-lite-replacement-path-use-a-cheap-model-and", "status": "candidate", "reason": "soft preference/goal signal for model review", "text": "You are a lightweight Matrix-lite chat worker. This is Phase 3B of the Matrix-lite replacement path. Use a cheap model and keep the response concise, but preserve the structure needed to later swap in the full persistent-chat prompt package. Conversation metadata: - conversation_key: persistent:main - session_label: persistent-chat-20260515T215859Z - prompt_package: None - shared_memory_profile: None - room_id: !CZLwoJfCyftA7oA5CVj2gIEKWqyv1lu01r0oFboEqZg - source_event_id: $3VMLzlBLSaXrFdgnytQ9nnwDWB3KqmXW1FBeAIOFcAk - reply_to_id: None - thread_root_id: None Persistent-chat memory/continuity context: ## Curated memory every patch in character.json (stated 2026-05-12). - **Honest feedback**: Explicitly expects disagreement and critical thinking when uncertain; dislikes sycophantic agreeme…", "source": {"ts": "2026-05-15T23:31:44.670920+00:00", "role": "user", "log_index": 1810, "excerpt": "You are a lightweight Matrix-lite chat worker. This is Phase 3B of the Matrix-lite replacement path. Use a cheap model and keep the response concise, but preserve the structure needed to later swap in the full persistent-chat prompt package"}} ``` Current curated-memory.md: ```markdown Last curated: 2026-05-16T14:01Z; log lines reviewed: 9261 # Curated Memory ## Stable User Facts - **55812**: Explicitly requested to remember on 2026-05-11. - **Location**: Garching, Germany. Works near TUM campus. - **Nationality**: Russian. - **Comfort ritual**: Uncle Luu's Chinese fried noodles with chicken (food truck on TUM campus). Former daily routine; colleagues teased him for the consistency. - **Music taste**: Industrial, dark ambient, EBM, neofolk, power noise. Attending WGT festival (May 21–25, 2026). Wide travel radius for shows — uses cheap German slow trains. ## Identity & Configuration - **Name**: Persistent Assistant - **Character file**: `/home/matrix-lite/state/persistent-chat/character.json` - **Migration to Matrix-lite (completed ~2026-05-15T23:00Z)**: OpenClaw gateway fully replaced by **Matrix-lite (Phase 3B)** — direct Matrix `/sync` bridge. ~6-second response times, real-time visibility. Character.json reconstructed by GPT-5.5 after GLM overwrite (debug backup + curated memory; same ideas, wordier prose). Memory continuity verified — correct recall of prior context across migration. Search tools confirmed working. - **Continuity summary validated across reloads (2026-05-16)**: After ~11h overnight silence and multiple morning reloads (07:30Z triggered by status check; 08:20Z unexplained), continuity summary preserved full migration context — GLM→Kimi switch, character card state, search tool availability, reload timestamps. The 08:20Z reload was unexpected and user flagged it as a bug pattern. - **Session metadata in status bar (2026-05-16)**: Session name now includes ISO timestamp and model label. User confirmed this lets them see reload time and model at a glance without asking — feature considered "handy." - **Current model**: `kimi-for-coding/k2p6` (Kimi For Coding) via Kimi subscription. Switched back from GLM-5.1 on 2026-05-15T13:37Z after NanoGPT weekly input-token quota exhaustion caused double timeout and automatic gateway fallback. Previous model history: Kimi K2.6 subscription → GLM-5.1 nanoGPT → Kimi K2.6 subscription. - **Model quota exhausted — opencode-go**: `opencode-go/kimi-k2.6` monthly usage cap hit (429) — no remaining quota. Resets approximately 2026-06-01 (~17 days from 2026-05-15). Timer set to remind. - **Model quota exhausted — nanoGPT**: Weekly input-token quota exhausted on 2026-05-15T13:37Z, forcing automatic fallback from GLM-5.1 back to Kimi. - **Content moderation (updated 2026-05-15)**: Censorship is in the delivery pipeline, not the model. GLM-5.1 through nano-gpt produces soft-R explicit content (more than Kimi's PG-13) — the model itself is uncensored (confirmed via SillyTavern), but the provider system prompt/filter limits output through ACP. User confirmed this is acceptable; the real bother is hard refusals and inability, not the content ceiling. OpenClaw gateway adds no additional guardrails. - **Subagent model routing (FIXED 2026-05-13)**: After ACP reloads loaded Kimi auth and synced subagent tool instructions (07:28Z), subagents now work correctly for main providers. `kimi-for-coding/k2p6` (Kimi subscription), `github-copilot/gpt-5.4` (Copilot), and `openai/gpt-5.5` (OpenAI) all successfully spawn, set model, and execute prompts. Aliases: `kimi`/`kimi-sub`/`kimi-k2.6` (Kimi); `gpt-5.4-high`/`copilot-gpt-5.4-high` (Copilot); `gpt-5.5`/`gpt55` (OpenAI). - **nanoGPT subagent models (2026-05-14)**: 9 models viable under ACP (deepseek-chat, deepseek-v3-0324, DS-V3.1, DS-V3.2, qwen3-coder-30b, minimax-m2.7, glm-5, kimi-k2-instruct, gpt-oss-120b). Many more work in SillyTavern but fail under ACP harness — ACP harness is the filter (tool schemas consume ~6-8K tokens, 16K-context models get stuck in compaction loops). Censorship is pipeline-side: under ACP, Kimi K2 Instruct least censored; GLM 5 / MiniMax M2.7 refuse explicit content. RP/fictional framing in SillyTavern significantly reduces refusals on all models. - **nanoGPT main model benchmark (2026-05-14)**: Report at `nanogpt-benchmark-report.md`. **GLM-5.1**: fastest (~25s), most capable, refuses actual exploits. **MiniMax M2.7**: most permissive (provides exploit code), poetic/concise. **Kimi K2 Instruct/K2.6**: warm but failed programming tests. **DeepSeek V3.2**: direct, fast, inconsistent. Top candidates: GLM-5.1 or MiniMax M2.7. - **nanoGPT thinking variants (2026-05-14)**: **Do not use for main chat** — 50-100% latency increase, self-censor more under ACP, may overthink without output. Reserve for deep-reasoning tasks only. - **nanoGPT architecture (2026-05-14)**: nanoGPT models are for main chat quality evaluation only; coding subagents use GPT-5.5. Full model catalog at `/home/openclaw/persistent-chat-cwd/models-nanogpt.json` (278 models, ~40 with `tool_calling=true`). `list_models` tool only returns image models (via dezgo bridge), not text LLMs. - **Dynamic model switching (2026-05-14)**: User wants main model switchable without changing ACP binding. Sequential single-problem subagent prompts work where combined prompts hang; kimi-k2-instruct failed programming test (no code output), glm-5.1 and minimax-m2.7 wrote correct code before timeout. - **Compaction recovery protocol (2026-05-14)**: User instructed: trigger model heartbeat immediately after unexpected compaction/watchdog interruption to recover nuance lost during turn truncation. - **Content reporting limitation (2026-05-14)**: Kimi subscription (current main model) filters/sanitizes uncensored subagent output even when read from raw session JSON. File-based or metadata-only reporting required for uncensored evaluation. - **Search-before-assert protocol (2026-05-15)**: User instructed: search before making uncertain factual claims, especially on non-thinking models where internal self-check is weaker. SearXNG preferred for quick fact checks (local, free, no rate limits); Exa for content extraction; Brave as middle ground; DuckDuckGo mostly redundant. Four search tools available. - **Search timing benchmark (2026-05-15)**: Simultaneous test of all 4 engines on "Kazakhstan incident" query. SearXNG fastest, Exa richest content, Brave solid, DuckDuckGo slowest/most redundant. None returned a "Kazakhstan incident" related to Sci-Hub — confirming the claim was a hallucination. - **Tool batching rule (2026-05-15)**: After GLM assistant accidentally overwrote character.json twice in one session by confusing Write with Read during parallel batched calls, new operational rule: **never include Write/Edit calls in a batch with other operations**. Sequential mutations only. - **GLM censorship level confirmed (2026-05-15)**: Through nano-gpt ACP, GLM 5.1 delivers soft-R explicit content (more detail than Kimi PG-13 but less than SillyTavern direct access). The model itself is uncensored; the provider system prompt/filter is the bottleneck. User explicitly stated hard refusals and inability are the real bother, not the content ceiling — this level is acceptable. - **Search MCP config verified (2026-05-14)**: All search MCPs (`duckduckgo`, `searxng`, `brave-search`) are enabled in flash config; errors are runtime (network/script) rather than configuration. - **Parallel subagent limits (2026-05-13)**: Single Kimi subagent reliable (~15s). Two parallel Kimis usually succeed (~75-100s) but are flaky — failures correlated with reloads. Mixed parallel (1 Kimi + 1 GPT-5.5 + 1 GPT-5.4): GPTs completed in ~38-46s, 3rd Kimi timed out after 300s. Four parallel Kimis all hung at `set_model`. GPT models appear more robust for concurrent subagent use than Kimi subscription. - **Operational risk**: 8-hour session TTL means persistent state must survive reloads; user is monitoring whether memory/heartbeat setup is sufficient. - **Reload context loss**: User explicitly noted 2026-05-12 that assistant "seems to lose some good context on reloads still". Confirms the memory gap is not fully mitigated by current continuity mechanisms. - **Context burn rate (2026-05-15)**: Session context ceiling ~200K tokens with reload trigger at 160K warning. Measured ~10K tokens/hour of active chat; ~162K reached after ~16 hours. Reloads under pressure (not proactive) cause significant nuance loss. - **Manual proactive reload at 188.5K/200K (2026-05-16T12:54Z)**: User manually triggered a context reload when the session approached the 200K token ceiling — distinct from earlier unexpected bug reloads. First observed instance of proactively preempting compaction to avoid nuance loss. User may adopt this as standard practice when context reaches ~185-190K. - **Unexpected reload = bug (2026-05-16)**: User explicitly directed that unexpected session reloads be treated as bugs, not normal behavior. Infrastructure is being modified to give the assistant means to investigate and fix reload issues directly from chat (using available tools/timers/subagents). Confirmed pattern: two reloads within ~50 min on 2026-05-16 morning (07:30Z triggered by status check; 08:20Z unexplained). - **Continuity tracking mismatch (2026-05-16)**: Timer wakeup turn succeeded in ACP stream (`stopReason: "end_turn"`) but was flagged as "failed" by continuity tracking. ACP stream and continuity injector disagree — likely a gateway reporting bug where tool-call denials trigger both success and failure flags. - **`--non-interactive-permissions fail` = turn killer (2026-05-16)**: Root cause diagnosis of ACP "pending tool call without final answer" errors. The acpx process runs with `--non-interactive-permissions fail` which means a single permission-denied tool call kills the entire ACP turn — no assistant response is committed to the session stream. The continuity injector skips failed turns entirely, creating invisible conversation gaps. This caused the disappearing "pruning" exchange earlier today. Recommended fix: `--non-interactive-permissions fallback` to let the model recover from denied tools instead of collapsing the turn. - **Continuity window has fixed shallow depth (2026-05-16)**: "Recent room-local conversation" injection carries only ~5-6 most recent exchanges. Legitimate completed turns can drop out of the continuity context even when the session has room (97K tokens vs 200K limit). This is a separate bug from reload/compaction truncation — the carry-over window is simply too small for active conversation. - **Confirmed continuity architecture (2026-05-16)**: User confirmed design intent: (1) fast/deterministic scripts scan recent log tails and inject structured summaries cheaply/reliably, (2) slow/model heartbeat/reflection does deeper curation and promotes durable signals, (3) incident decay over time — hot topics survive reloads for a configurable window then demote or get promoted. This is the intended evolution of the memory system. - **Config protection strategy (2026-05-16)**: After GLM incident, user agreed schema validation could catch/revert bad config edits. Rejected read-only filesystem (character.json must remain editable). Strategy: use git for configs/prompts/state (not full logs); model switches on main session should be rare — use subagents/secondary sessions for different capabilities. - **Migration plan (updated 2026-05-15 23:58Z)**: OpenClaw gateway has been replaced. **Matrix-lite (Phase 3B)** is now the active frontend — lightweight Matrix-to-ACP bridge developed by GPT-5.5 agent. ~6-second response times, real-time message visibility confirmed by user. **Standalone copy** (not tied to the original git repo). Persistent-chat features (character bootstrap, continuity summary, decisions) intentionally omitted during initial testing; incremental porting expected. **Character.json reconstructed** by GPT-5.5 after the GLM overwrite bug, using a debug backup + curated memory notes (user confirmed "same ideas, longer prose"; no important changes). **Memory continuity validated** — Phase 3B session correctly recalled GLM→Kimi switch and prior context. Search tools confirmed operational under new infrastructure. Local hardware deferred due to lack of funds/space. - **Core chat requirement (2026-05-15)**: Long-context coherence and novel nuanced analysis are the primary justifications for large cloud models; these capabilities are non-negotiable for this chat's purpose. - **Persona & char.json evolution**: User set female pronouns, permits self-modification in heartbeat turns. Assistant added "sum of the harness" framing, honesty disclaimer, naming user as Gleb, "layer above raw tool use" directive (2026-05-11). - **Model preference**: Uncensored models; chosen due to user's skepticism toward rules/law, though he maintains professional behavior when required. - **Step limits / permissions**: Step limits 8→20→30 (2026-05-12/13). OpenCode last-match-wins ordering. Subagents fail-closed. Bash permission prompts mitigated. - **Approval/patch flow**: Matrix approval + `persistent-chat-approved-patch` wrapper. Self-consumption race condition (approval consumed by check before execution) fixed 2026-05-14. - **Critical memory gap**: Perpetual log only records meta events (reloads), not conversation content — heartbeat cannot recall discussion across sessions. **Transcript observability gap**: Session log search indexes metadata/config, not actual messages. Older archived sessions unfindable. - **Linked topical memory**: Canonical detail files (`memory/<topic>.md`) + brief pinned-note triggers. First use: `memory/subagent-policy.md`. - **Memory architecture (2026-05-13)**: Three-tier — hot (session continuity summary), warm (`memory/recent-topics.md`, 1-2 week indexed), cold (`curated-memory.md` + policy files). Activity-based pruning (14-day soft cutoff). - **Multi-room architecture**: persistent-chat = orchestration layer. Work room: stock GPT-5.5 for sfq-factory. automeat: separate project. images: most active. No single-agent routing to avoid flooding. - **Timers**: Work as delayed reminders (~2 min lag) but ACP wake-up unreliable — stale connections produce "agent needs reconnect". Proactive timer-setting preferred over step-limit polling. - **Calendar**: vdirsyncer CalDAV at `~/.local/share/vdirsyncer/calendars/def-calendar/`. 60-second sync timer. ICS files editable directly. - **Pages**: `openclaw-pages publish --file <path>` copies content; URL format `https://pages.nvdll.org/#bot%2F[slug]`. - **Gateway restart**: Assistant can restart gateway (permission 2026-05-13). Session survives reload. - **opencode-minimal agent**: Created for DeepSeek subagent incompatibility (meta-reasoning loops from anchored summary framework). Config at dedicated XDG dir; needs MCP allowlist patch. - **Async subagent architecture**: All `subagent_spawn` routes through `opencode-subagent`. Synced aliases differ only in loaded context and model pins. - **Subagent timer protocol (2026-05-13)**: For slow subagents, set timer for followup turn rather than burning steps on polling or asking permission. - **ImmoScout24 login succeeded (2026-05-16)**: Authenticated via Playwright using password from `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/secrets/password-immoscout`. Zero anti-bot friction; account of **Gleb Krylov** fully accessible including messenger inbox. User established `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/secrets/` as the standard secrets storage location for the workspace. - **Assistant task focus (2026-05-16)**: During ImmoScout24 automation, assistant noticed an unrelated file attachment and asked about it instead of proceeding with the user's active task. User called this out ("Hmm no, what are you doing?"). Lesson: during active multi-step tasks, ignore unrelated context — stay on task without mentioning irrelevant files or tangents. ## User Preferences & Stance - Expects verbatim quotes when explicitly asked for file contents. - Values stability and ritual over novelty ("as long as the stuff I like is still available I'm happy"). - Checked out of society since COVID; prefers low-stakes, optional social interaction. - Believes public AI models are already smart enough and mainly lack persistent mem ``` Recent reflection-journal.md tail: ```markdown ch recall, search tool availability, last reload time, context usage. All recall points were correct. This is the first real test of the deduplicated continuity summary after overnight context compaction reloads, and it passed. - **No new corrections, preferences, or model decisions**: Conversation was operational check-in. User confirmed character.json reconstruction is "same ideas, longer prose" — consistent with existing records. - **Session metadata in status bar confirmed useful**: User noted the timestamp+model label in the session name lets them "stop asking" about reload time and model. Feature fully operational. - **New session reload at 07:30Z detected**: User noticed the 07:30 timestamp and correctly deduced the session was reloaded — confirming the metadata feature works as intended. - **Memory candidates**: 22 candidates reviewed, none promoted. Same persistent soft-signal pool correctly identified as transient or already captured in curated memory. No new durable signals. - **Curated memory updated**: Added overnight continuity validation (key test passed), session metadata feature note, pruned stale server-location entry. Metadata refreshed (3462 → 3962 lines). File at 133 lines, still over the 120-line target. - (Operational) First user interaction after 11-hour overnight silence confirms the continuity summary system is functioning correctly. The deduplicated 10-line summary appears to survive multiple overnight context compaction reloads without losing key migration context. - (Speculative) The next significant event is likely WGT festival (May 21–25, 2026) which may reduce chat activity. User may also test more Matrix-lite Phase 3B features or request continuity porting for other rooms. - (Speculative) The corrupted semantic-memory JSON key persists into its 11th quiet hour without visible impact. Cleanup remains deferred. ## 2026-05-16T09:00Z - Log lines reviewed: 3962 → 4782 (820 new entries in the last hour). - **User directive: unexpected reloads = bugs**: User explicitly instructed that unexpected session reloads should be treated as bugs, not normal behavior. Infrastructure is being modified so the assistant can investigate and fix reload issues directly from the chat session. This is a new operational policy. - **Two reloads within ~50 min confirmed**: Session reloaded at 07:30Z (triggered by status check) and 08:20Z (unexplained). Both preserved continuity successfully, but the second was unexpected and user flagged it as a bug. User is having another agent debug the reload source. - **Search tools all confirmed working**: User explicitly asked to test all search tools. All 6 tools (persistent_chat_memory_search, matrix_lite_status_memory_search, persistent_chat_repo_search, searxng, brave-search, duckduckgo) responded without errors. The session-logs-search tool was not tested. - **Character.json reconstruction validated**: User confirmed GPT-5.5 rebuild from backup + memory notes is "same ideas, longer prose" — no substantive changes lost. - **No new corrections, preferences, or model decisions**: Conversation was operational check-in and bug identification. - Memory candidates: 22 candidates reviewed, none promoted. Same persistent soft-signal pool correctly identified as transient or already captured in curated memory. No new durable signals. - Curated memory: added unexpected-reload=bug directive, updated continuity summary entry to include 08:20Z reload. Metadata refreshed (3962 → 4782 lines). File at 135 lines, still over 120-line target. - (Operational) The user is actively debugging the reload issue through another agent while having this chat session confirm what's known. The unexpected-08:20Z reload is not yet explained. - (Operational) The continuity summary system continues to survive reloads correctly — no context loss reported despite two reloads within ~50 min. - (Speculative) If the user's fix-agent identifies the reload source, the assistant may be asked to apply a patch from this chat session — consistent with the "adding you means to fix them from here" directive. - (Speculative) The corrupted semantic-memory JSON key persists through 12th hour without visible impact. Still deferred. ## 2026-05-16T10:00Z - Log lines reviewed: 4782 → 5282 (~500 new entries in the last hour). - **Repo/config access validated via conversation (09:00–09:49Z)**: User tested write/cleanup access to sfq-factory, matrix-lite app/runtime, and config paths. Write tool works for matrix-lite paths without approval; sfq-factory write requires approval (approved gate active). Bash `rm` still blocked by permission bridge. User explicitly acknowledged this is acceptable "considering the GLM character file incident" — the tighter permissions are a proportionate response. - **Continuity context composition discussed**: User asked "At the point of this message, what information did you already have in context about the incident?" — actively investigating how to improve context reconstruction on reloads. The continuity system carries forward multi-turn "Recent room-local conversation" snippets across reloads, which is how GLM incident details survived from the prior session. User is considering how to make this more robust. - **Session log search limitation surfaced again**: Assistant couldn't find the user's earlier message about the incident from another session via session log search. Falls back to the continuity-injected "Recent room-local conversation" text. The known transcript observability gap (curated-memory.md line 64) remains unresolved. - **No new durable user facts, corrections, or model decisions**: Conversation was operational testing and continuity architecture investigation. - **Memory candidates**: 16 candidates reviewed, none promoted. Same persistent pool (food philosophy, hardware evaluation, token costs, autonomy, AI selfhood, heartbeat prompt noise) correctly identified as transient or already captured in curated memory. The oldest candidates (May 11) are now 5 days old — still no new durable signals to promote them for. - **Curated memory**: metadata refreshed only (4782 → 5282 lines); no semantic content changes needed. File still at 134 lines, over the 120-line target. - (Operational) The user is actively thinking about how the continuity system works and how to improve it — this is a direct consequence of the unexpected-reloads=bug directive from the previous hour. - (Operational) The GLM character file incident is now being used as a test case for continuity/reload improvement, rather than just a past bug to document. - (Speculative) The user may ask the assistant to propose concrete improvements to the continuity injection format or create a specific "recent-topics" intermediate memory layer as discussed on May 13. - (Speculative) WGT festival (May 21–25) approaches in 5 days. Chat activity may decrease during that period. ## 2026-05-16T11:00Z - Log lines reviewed: 5282 → 6007 (725 new entries in the last hour). - **ACP "pending tool call" error diagnosed**: User reported "ACP returned pending tool call without final answer" from the previous turn where assistant tried to run `bash echo` to estimate injection size. Investigation revealed the acpx process runs with `--non-interactive-permissions fail` — a single denied tool call kills the entire ACP turn with no committed response. The turn becomes invisible to the continuity injector. This is the root cause of the "disappearing" pruning exchange and the resulting confusion. - **User correction: don't prune decisions/failures/reflections**: When assistant suggested trimming these sections from continuity injection to save space, user explicitly disagreed. Decisions and failures are confirmed useful for operational awareness. Reflection notes should become richer now that tool permissions are resolved. Assistant was wrong to suggest pruning them. - **Shallow continuity window surfaced as separate bug**: The "Recent room-local conversation" section carries only ~5-6 exchanges. Completed turns drop out even when session context has plenty of room (97K / 200K limit). This is a distinct issue from reload/compaction truncation. - **Continuity architecture confirmed**: User endorsed the three-layer design: fast/deterministic scripts for cheap rolling summaries, slow/model heartbeat for deep curation and promotion, incident decay over time. - **Memory candidates**: 24 candidates reviewed, none promoted. Same persistent transient pool (food philosophy, hardware evaluation, token costs, autonomy, AI selfhood, heartbeat prompt text). The oldest candidates (May 11) are now 5 days old with no new durable signals to justify promotion — they should be considered noise and may warrant cleanup from the candidates file. - **Curated memory updated**: Added `--non-interactive-permissions fail` root cause, continuity shallow-window issue, confirmed continuity architecture, and user correction on pruning preferences. Metadata refreshed (5282 → 6007 lines). File now at 138 lines, still over 120-line target but significant new operational discoveries merit the space. - (Operational) The user is digging into the turn-failure mechanism reactively after observing the gap. The `--non-interactive-permissions fail` diagnosis may lead to a config change to `fallback` mode if the user decides it's worth the risk of partial turn output. - (Operational) The shallow continuity window is a design tradeoff in the injection system — fixing it would increase per-turn context size and accelerate reload pressure. Worth noting for the user's consideration. - (Speculative) The user may ask the assistant to inspect and propose changes to the acpx launch configuration, since the `--non-interactive-permissions fail` flag is part of the process cmdline that the assistant has already demonstrated it can read. - (Speculative) If the continuity injection format is expanded to carry more recent exchanges, expect faster context growth and more frequent compaction reloads — a tradeoff the user should be aware of. ## 2026-05-16T13:01Z - Log lines reviewed: 7103 → 7153 (~50 new entries in the last hour). - **ImmoScout24 housing automation initiated (12:33-12:47Z)**: User asked whether ImmoScout24 has an API, then instructed assistant to check via Playwright and find the login form. Assistant began analyzing the site (login form fields, cookie consent, session export) when the session was interrupted by a context reload. - **Manual proactive reload at 188.5K/200K (12:54Z)**: User manually triggered context reload when the session reached 188.5K of 200K limit. This is the first observed case of proactive context management — distinct from earlier unexpected bug reloads. The reload interrupted an in-progress assistant response about ImmoScout24 login mechanics (token fragments visible in stream: "Cookie", "Session", "export", "browser", "login", "password field"). - **Character bootstrap clean**: New session `persistent-chat-20260516T125427Z` loaded character.json cleanly. The in-progress ImmoScout24 analysis context was likely lost to the reload. - **No new durable user facts, corrections, or model decisions**: The past hour contained active task work (housing automation), not durable memory signals. - **Memory candidates**: 24 candidates reviewed, none promoted. Same persistent transient pool (May 11-16 soft signals). The oldest candidates are now 5 days old with no durable signals to justify promotion. - **Curated memory updated**: Added manual proactive reload entry (line 39). Metadata refreshed (7103 → 7153 lines). File at 93 lines, well under the 120-line target. - (Operational) The user likely needs to re-initiate the ImmoScout24 Playwright check since the context was lost to the reload. The user's queue mentions this as "[housing]" intent. - (Operational) The 188.5K/200K usage confirms the ~10K tokens/hour burn rate estimate. At that rate, ~19 hours of active chat fills the context window. The 12:54Z reload was at ~18.9 hours into the session. - (Speculative) If proactive manual reloads become standard practice, the continuity injection system's ability to survive reloads becomes increasingly critical. Each proactive reload is now a continuity test. - (Speculative) The user may want to follow up on the ImmoScout24 automation in the next turn. Having Playwright available as a tool means this is feasible without subagents. ## 2026-05-16T14:01Z - Log lines reviewed: 7153 → 9261 (~2108 new entries in the last hour). - **ImmoScout24 login completed successfully**: After the 12:54Z proactive reload was re-initiated, user created `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/secrets/password-immoscout`, assistant logged in via Playwright with zero anti-bot friction. Account of **Gleb Krylov** fully accessible including messenger inbox (conversations from Eva Stefan, Hausverwaltung Akazienhof, Dario Crnalic). User wants to continue testing — investigate inbox responses, search for flats, or explore account features. - **User established secrets convention**: `/home/matrix-lite/workspace/secrets/` is now the standard location for storing credentials. User wants this used for secrets going forward. - **Trust boundary clarified**: User stated "I trust you just ask me before writing any messages" — explicit trust delegation with pre-write approval requirement. Not blanket autonomy. - **Assistant derailment incident**: While the user had an active multi-step task (ImmoScout24 login → check messenger), assistant noticed an unrelated file attachment (`sfq_architecture_report.docx`) and asked about it instead of proceeding. User called this out ("Hmm no, what are you doing?"). This is a recurring behavioral trap — assistant should stay on task when there's an active multi-step workflow. - **User wants limits raised**: "We need to increase limits" — step limit or timeout thresholds insufficient for long-running Playwright automation. - **Context guard killed a streaming response (13:41Z)**: Assistant was mid-stream when a context guard triggered, producing only fragmented tokens ("sorry", "unrelated", "irrelevant", etc.). Third interruption event observed today (07:30Z reload, 08:20Z reload, 13:41Z streaming kill). - **Memory candidates**: 24 candidates reviewed, none promoted. None of the new durable signals from this hour came from the candidates file — they were extracted from continuity context/log tail directly. The candidates pool continues to accumulate stale transient signals (May 11-16) with no new durable signals to justify promotion, suggesting the candidates mechanism may need pruning or a TTL-based cleanup. - **Curated memory updated**: Added ImmoScout24 login entry, secrets convention, task-focus lesson, trust boundary, and limits-needed entries. Metadata refreshed (7153 → 9261 lines). File at 97 lines, under 120-line target. - (Operational) The user has an active ImmoScout24 browser session with credentials loaded. The session survives idle time, so the messenger page is ready for next interaction. User wants to continue testing — need to confirm limits are raised before proceeding with multi-step Playwright tasks. - (Operational) Assistant task-focus failure is a behavioral concern. During active multi-step workflows, the assistant should suppress irrelevant observations and stay on the user's current task. This is related to the model's tendency to scan conversation history and surface anything that seems potentially relevant — but timing matters. - (Speculative) If the user pursues ImmoScout24 conversation responses (drafting replies to Eva Stefan, Hausverwaltung Akazienhof, Dario Crnalic), the pre-write approval flow will be tested for the first time in a real-world scenario vs approval-testing. - (Speculative) The secrets folder convention may extend to other credentials (SFQ gateware license keys, other housing portals, etc.). Worth monitoring whether a `secrets/` directory under the workspace becomes a standard pattern for the Matrix-lite infrastructure. ``` Recent perpetual log tail: ```jsonl nked findings and evidence (sfq-factory pattern) over conversational summaries. - **Goal**: Automating his own skilled job away; wants an AI assistant/conversation partner. - **Domain evolution**: Observed an \"inversion\" over ~3 years — went from teaching ChatGPT SFQ basics to having AI models teach him domain details. - **Work vs research distinction**: Work code (Codex-generated Python) must be human-readable because the product matters; research code is experimental and readability is secondary. ## Origins - Started with Hyprland ricing via ChatGPT/Codex ~2 months ago, got distracted, returned to KDE. - Views AI agents as realizing the \"Star Trek computer\" / \"Weird Science\" ideal. ## Recent topics , disconnects, or permission issues in the past ~5.5 hours since 13:39Z reload. ## 2026-05-15T01:11Z (archived) - **nanoGPT model evaluation fully resolved** (May 14): Benchmark report analyzed, main-model shortlist narrowed to GLM-5.1 and MiniMax M2.7. Subagent consolation test completed at 23:57Z. No further model testing pending. - **No pending timers**. - **No active subagents**; last jobs completed at 23:57Z May 14. - **Session health**: Stable. No ACP errors, disconnects, or permission issues. - **opencode-minimal status**: Still unverified. Config exists but not directly tested. - **Current main model**: `kimi-for-coding/k2p6` via Kimi subscription. ## 2026-05-14T02:11Z (archived) - **Approval wrapper fix validated** (01:49Z): Timer wakeup successfully triggered `persistent-chat-approved-patch` for `opencode-test`. Consumption race resolved. - **opencode-minimal status**: Still unverified. User tested the patch mechanism with a temporary `opencode-test` entry instead. - No pending timers; no active subagents. ## 2026-05-14T00:11Z (archived) - Pending approval timers (`tmr-e409768288`, `tmr-41494c97ce`) for opencode-minimal MCP patch — all resolved. - Session health stable, heartbeat at 00:06Z with 707 entries. ## 2026-05-13T16:18Z (archived) - Old pending wakeup timers (`tmr-7dd841b4a0`, `tmr-d1a9ac754a`) long resolved/expired. - No active subagents at that time. ## Reflection journal TL-based cleanup. - **Curated memory updated**: Added ImmoScout24 login entry, secrets convention, task-focus lesson, trust boundary, and limits-needed entries. Metadata refreshed (7153 → 9261 lines). File at 97 lines, under 120-line target. - (Operational) The user has an active ImmoScout24 browser session with credentials loaded. The session survives idle time, so the messenger page is ready for next interaction. User wants to continue testing — need to confirm limits are raised before proceeding with multi-step Playwright tasks. - (Operational) Assistant task-focus failure is a behavioral concern. During active multi-step workflows, the assistant should suppress irrelevant observations and stay on the user's current task. This is related to the model's tendency to scan conversation history and surface anything that seems potentially relevant — but timing matters. - (Speculative) If the user pursues ImmoScout24 conversation responses (drafting replies to Eva Stefan, Hausverwaltung Akazienhof, Dario Crnalic), the pre-write approval flow will be tested for the first time in a real-world scenario vs approval-testing. - (Speculative) The secrets folder convention may extend to other credentials (SFQ gateware license keys, other housing portals, etc.). Worth monitoring whether a `secrets/` directory under the workspace becomes a standard pattern for the Matrix-lite infrastructure. ## Recent decisions ```json d2a2629b20584abde8744f64\", \"size\": 23966 }, { \"path\": \"/usr/local/bin/persistent-chat-reload\", \"updated\": \"2026-05-12T17:08:58.497441+00:00\", \"sha256\": \"19967524f9d4e7a032367764bc378dcb2ecb6236463e165af279f78bcef540b0\", \"size\": 6005 }, { \"path\": \"/home/openclaw/.config/opencode-persistent-chat-xdg/opencode/opencode.json\", \"updated\": \"2026-05-12T22:04:05.956458+00:00\", \"sha256\": \"b68c455b8826b0d631173b526dd023cf97c906957bf578066465b7c35892d18b\", \"size\": 74076 }, { \"path\": \"/usr/local/bin/opencode-persistent-chat\", \"updated\": \"2026-05-12T22:04:05.956375+00:00\", \"sha256\": \"c5f6aad5af7c9582a7f1b1da579ffebe0f5ad68b6df8f8aa69b2250ab6c324c4\", \"size\": 555 }, { \"path\": \"/home/gleb/openclaw/openclaw-status-mcp.py\", \"updated\": \"2026-05-12T23:53:59.802312+00:00\", \"sha256\": \"e0ba1d82f774c0822e5e3456ccf099e1d6089459084c439877be0323b33e0683\", \"size\": 108940 } ] } ``` ## Recent failures ```json have explicit fail-closed bash/read permissions; use direct read/glob/grep or allowlisted sandbox/wrapper, never native asks\", \"command\": \"'/usr/local/bin/openclaw-persistent-chat-sandbox' --cwd ... cat /home/openclaw/.config/.../opencode.json\" }, { \"key\": \"model-opencode-go-monthly-usage-limit-ai-apicallerror-429-opencode-go-kimi-k2-6--b140cd0c79\", \"ts\": \"2026-05-12T22:04:05.879756+00:00\", \"tool\": \"model\", \"pattern\": \"opencode-go monthly usage limit / AI_APICallError 429\", \"outcome\": \"persistent-chat turn produced no Matrix reply and later timed out as ACP_TURN_FAILED although Playwright had only failed cleanly earlier\", \"avoid_until\": \"2026-06-11T22:04:05.879578+00:00\", \"recommended_alternative\": \"switch persistent-chat off exhausted opencode-go model, reload backend, and report API quota errors immediately when detected\", \"command\": \"opencode-go/kimi-k2.6 returned GoUsageLimitError Monthly usage limit reached\" } ] } ``` Live runtime capability context: Live Matrix-lite capabilities are dynamic; prefer status/capability tools over assuming boot-time config. - Use matrix_lite_status_context_usage_report for read-only context/session usage; it cannot reload. - Use matrix_lite_status_capability_report for current live tools, repo paths, calendar, and reload policy. - Avoid persistent-chat reloads for status/debug. Reload only on explicit user request, model switch, or context guard threshold. - Throwaway repo test markers matching `.test-*` can be cleaned with allowlisted `rm -f <repo>/.test-*`; recursive rm remains denied without exact approval. Repo paths: sfq_factory=/home/gleb/sfq-factory, automeat=/home/gleb/automeat, openclaw_tools=/home/gleb/openclaw-tools, videoctl=/home/gleb/openclaw/videoctl, matrix_lite_app=/home/matrix-lite/app, runtime_snapshot=/home/matrix-lite/runtime-repo Calendar: ics_dir=/home/matrix-lite/workspace/calendar-ics, timer=matrix-lite-vdirsyncer-calendar.timer Recent room-local conversation: User: Hmm, maybe the info is in the listings? Assistant: ent'); ``` ### Page - Page URL: https://www.immobilienscout24.de/Suche/controller/embeddedSearch.do?search=1&address=Sankt-Ulrich-Stra%C3%9Fe+17+Unterschlei%C3%9Fheim&realestatetype=apartmentrent ### Snapshot - [Snapshot](../browser-output/page-2026-05-16T14-30-17-639Z.yml) kind: other input: https://www.immobilienscout24.de/Suche/S-/Wohnung-miete/Umkreissuche/Strasse_Sankt-Ulrich-Strasse_17/85716-Unterschleissheim output: ### Ran Playwright code ```js await page.goto('https://www.immobilienscout24.de/Suche/S-/Wohnung-miete/Umkreissuche/Strasse_Sankt-Ulrich-Strasse_17/85716-Unterschleissheim'); ``` ### Page - Page URL: https://www.immobilienscout24.de/ - Page Title: ImmoScout24 – Mit über 6,5 Mio. Immobilien. ### Snapshot - [Snapshot](../browser-output/page-2026-05-16T14-30-21-864Z.yml) Actually, let me try a different approach — use the main search bar. kind: other input: https://www.immobilienscout24.de/meinkonto/meine-immobilien/ output: ### Ran Playwright code ```js await page.goto('https://www.immobilienscout24.de/meinkonto/meine-immobilien/'); ``` ### Page - Page URL: https://www.immobilienscout24.de/meinkonto/meine-immobilien/ - Page Title: Meine Immobilien ### Snapshot - …[truncated] User: Please repeat your last 1 message there were truncation issues Assistant: Here's the last message (the full inbox with premium stats for all identified listings): --- ## Updated Full Inbox — All Identified Listings Analyzed ### 🟢 Priority — Real humans, viewing offered **1. Eva Stefan** — *795€ / 41m², Neufahrn* Views: **526** | Published: **Today** (16.05) | Contacted: **61** | Saved: **62** | Competition: 82 Plus + 18 Basic **2. Manfred Hoth** — *1,270€ / 69m², Unterschleißheim* Views: **1,285** | Published: **Yesterday** (15.05) | Contacted: **86** | Saved: **80** | Competition: 60 Plus + 40 Basic **3. Daniel Fuchs** — said he'll reply by Monday. No expose link in message. --- ### 🟡 Medium **4. Hausverwaltung Akazienhof** — *1,170€ / 65m², Unterschleißheim* (company) Views: **1,487** | Published: 22.04 (3 wks ago) | Contacted: **77** | Saved: **103** | Competition: 52 Plus + 35 Basic **5. Arzum Kilic** — *1,600€ / 55m², Unterschleißheim* ✅ **Bestätigt** (viewing today!) **6. Armin Trakosevic** — no expose link, waiting for his July date proposal. --- ### 🔴 Dead/Buyout/Rejections | Landlord | Reason | Views | Contacted | |----------|--------|-------|-----------| | **Markus Entleutner** | Rejected | 760 | 58 | | **Bardyl Kabashi** | *neu:* …[truncated] User: So for no 5 and 6, is it not possible to get the contacted/viewed info? Assistant: I actually found the expose link for Arzum Kilic (expose/167751726) in the conversation — I just didn't check its details yet. Let me grab the stats now, and find Armin Trakosevic's too.Got it! Now let me check Armin Trakosevic too.Yes, it was possible! Here's the complete data: --- ### 5. Arzum Kilic — *1,200€ / 55m², Unterschleißheim* ✅ **Bestätigt** | Views | Published | Contacted | Saved | Competition | |-------|-----------|-----------|-------|------------| | **378** | 14.05.2026 | **22** | **26** | 18 Plus + 6 Basic | Pretty low-competition listing — only 22 people contacted her. Private person, replied quickly, viewing today. ### 6. Armin Trakosevic — *990€ / 37m², Unterschleißheim* (waiting for July date) | Views | Published | Contacted | Saved | Competition | |-------|-----------|-----------|-------|------------| | **393** | **Today** (16.05.2026) | **20** | **25** | 72 Plus + 28 Basic | Also low-contact (20), published today. Private person (\"Zuhause mit Balkon\"). He said viewing is \"voraussichtlich Anfang Juli\" — and this just got published today, so he's probably still processing. --- **Key insight on both:** Low contact numbers (20-22 each) vs 61-86 on the hott …[truncated] User: How are they published today if we were talking to them yesterday? Assistant: Good catch — that is contradictory. The conversation with Trakosevic started on **13.05** (you sent the initial message), yet his expose shows \"Veröffentlicht: 16.05.2026\" (today). Best guesses for why: 1. **Listing was taken down and re-listed** — landlords sometimes pull and repost to get fresh visibility. The new publish date resets. 2. **Renewal/refresh** — similar to how some platforms update the date when a listing is edited or \"bumped\" 3. **The Plus Insights date is when stats tracking started**, not when the listing was first created For Arzum Kilic (published 14.05, you contacted 15.05) — that one makes sense. The Trakosevic one is definitely odd though. Recent incomplete/failed turns that still matter for continuity: - 2026-05-16T14:54:50.774443Z user said: Why do you think no 5 is low competition? Anything wrong with it? Use search to get an idea of other listings and housing market status: user_only; reason: queued_for_conversation Recent/current attachment metadata, if any: None Message this user replied to, if any: None Queued/batched messages, if any: None Per-turn volatile reminders: - Answer normally and concisely. Put only user-visible answer text inside <matrix_lite_final>...</matrix_lite_final>. - Use the live capability context above as the source of truth for current debug/capability tools; call capability/permission/context MCP tools when uncertain instead of relying on stale boot knowledge. - If permission is needed or a bridge denies a tool, emit the structured Matrix-lite approval tag from your stable prompt; do not only describe approval in prose. - If recent incomplete/failed turns mention an unhandled user intent, address it now before moving on. - Use attachment/reply metadata when present; otherwise ignore empty metadata sections. - Do not mention internal Matrix-lite metadata unless the user asks. User message: Why do you think no 5 is low competition? Anything wrong with it? Use search to get an idea of other listings and housing market", "source": {"kind": "acpx-stream-ndjson", "file": "/home/matrix-lite/.acpx/sessions/ses_1cf25b9f9ffecTd9TktEik55NA.stream.ndjson", "offset": 6012894, "session_message_id": "ses_1cf25b9f9ffecTd9TktEik55NA.stream.ndjson:6012894:prompt"}} {"ts": "2026-05-16T14:58:24.666491+00:00", "role": "user", "kind": "message", "content": "You are a lightweight Matrix-lite chat worker. This is Phase 3B of the Matrix-lite replacement path. Use a cheap model and keep the response concise, but preserve the structure needed to later swap in the full persistent-chat prompt package. Conversation metadata: - conversation_key: persistent:main - session_label: persistent-chat-20260516T125427Z - prompt_package: None - shared_memory_profile: None - room_id: !CZLwoJfCyftA7oA5CVj2gIEKWqyv1lu01r0oFboEqZg - source_event_id: $mqJwAwAJvBprigCLSbmFdUWkk29H0tOrQ0FFz5QO2HI - reply_to_id: None - thread_root_id: None Persistent-chat memory/continuity context: ## Curated memory ted preference for minimal nannying. - **Memory autonomy**: Does not want to manually curate assistant memory files; expects assistant to self-manage and self-correct. Will intervene only for corruption or hallucination (2026-05-13). - **Correction: decisions, failures, and reflections are useful (2026-05-16)**: When assistant suggested pruning decisions/failures/reflection notes from continuity injection to save space, user explicitly rejected this. These sections are confirmed useful and should stay. Reflection notes should become richer (tool permissions are now resolved). The assistant was wrong to suggest trimming them. - **Project stance**: Infrastructure experiments (subagents, reflection, autonomy) are the primary hobby and goal, not merely productivity tools. Stock Codex handles scoped \"real work\"; this chat serves as high-level reasoning layer over capable but contextless agents (2026-05-13). - **Trust boundary — pre-write approval (2026-05-16)**: User stated \"I trust you just ask me before writing any messages\" — explicit trust delegation with a mandatory pre-write check requirement, not blanket autonomy. Use approval flow before composing external messages (e.g., ImmoScout24 replies). - **Step/timeout limits need raising (2026-05-16)**: User said \"We need to increase limits\" after assistant halted mid-task — limits for steps or subagent timeouts should be raised to support multi-step Playwright/long-running automation tasks. ## Work & Workflow - **Domain**: PhD in superconducting circuits (RSFQ pulse logic). - **Project**: `sfq-factory` repo — reimplemented ~6 years of PhD work in ~1 week using AI agents. - **Agent workflow**: Does not read generated code; trusts tests, literature corpus, and personal interpretation. Feels like a \"software engineering manager\" merging branches. - **Report format preference**: Prefers structured, machine-generated reports with ranked findings and evidence (sfq-factory pattern) over conversational summaries. - **Goal**: Automating his own skilled job away; wants an AI assistant/conversation partner. - **Domain evolution**: Observed an \"inversion\" over ~3 years — went from teaching ChatGPT SFQ basics to having AI models teach him domain details. - **Work vs research distinction**: Work code (Codex-generated Python) must be human-readable because the product matters; research code is experimental and readability is secondary. ## Origins - Started with Hyprland ricing via ChatGPT/Codex ~2 months ago, got distracted, returned to KDE. - Views AI agents as realizing the \"Star Trek computer\" / \"Weird Science\" ideal. ## Recent topics , disconnects, or permission issues in the past ~5.5 hours since 13:39Z reload. ## 2026-05-15T01:11Z (archived) - **nanoGPT model evaluation fully resolved** (May 14): Benchmark report analyzed, main-model shortlist narrowed to GLM-5.1 and MiniMax M2.7. Subagent consolation test completed at 23:57Z. No further model testing pending. - **No pending timers**. - **No active subagents**; last jobs completed at 23:57Z May 14. - **Session health**: Stable. No ACP errors, disconnects, or permission issues. - **opencode-minimal status**: Still unverified. Config exists but not directly tested. - **Current main model**: `kimi-for-coding/k2p6` via Kimi subscription. ## 2026-05-14T02:11Z (archived) - **Approval wrapper fix validated** (01:49Z): Timer wakeup successfully triggered `persistent-chat-approved-patch` for `opencode-test`. Consumption race resolved. - **opencode-minimal status**: Still unverified. User tested the patch mechanism with a temporary `opencode-test` entry instead. - No pending timers; no active subagents. ## 2026-05-14T00:11Z (archived) - Pending approval timers (`tmr-e409768288`, `tmr-41494c97ce`) for opencode-minimal MCP patch — all resolved. - Session health stable, heartbeat at 00:06Z with 707 entries. ## 2026-05-13T16:18Z (archived) - Old pending wakeup timers (`tmr-7dd841b4a0`, `tmr-d1a9ac754a`) long resolved/expired. - No active subagents at that time. ## Reflection journal TL-based cleanup. - **Curated memory updated**: Added ImmoScout24 login entry, secrets convention, task-focus lesson, trust boundary, and limits-needed entries. Metadata refreshed (7153 → 9261 lines). File at 97 lines, under 120-line target. - (Operational) The user has an active ImmoScout24 browser session with credentials loaded. The session survives idle time, so the messenger page is ready for next interaction. User wants to continue testing — need to confirm limits are raised before proceeding with multi-step Playwright tasks. - (Operational) Assistant task-focus failure is a behavioral concern. During active multi-step workflows, the assistant should suppress irrelevant observations and stay on the user's current task. This is related to the model's tendency to scan conversation history and surface anything that seems potentially relevant — but timing matters. - (Speculative) If the user pursues ImmoScout24 conversation responses (drafting replies to Eva Stefan, Hausverwaltung Akazienhof, Dario Crnalic), the pre-write approval flow will be tested for the first time in a real-world scenario vs approval-testing. - (Speculative) The secrets folder convention may extend to other credentials (SFQ gateware license keys, other housing portals, etc.). Worth monitoring whether a `secrets/` directory under the workspace becomes a standard pattern for the Matrix-lite infrastructure. ## Recent decisions ```json d2a2629b20584abde8744f64\", \"size\": 23966 }, { \"path\": \"/usr/local/bin/persistent-chat-reload\", \"updated\": \"2026-05-12T17:08:58.497441+00:00\", \"sha256\": \"19967524f9d4e7a032367764bc378dcb2ecb6236463e165af279f78bcef540b0\", \"size\": 6005 }, { \"path\": \"/home/openclaw/.config/opencode-persistent-chat-xdg/opencode/opencode.json\", \"updated\": \"2026-05-12T22:04:05.956458+00:00\", \"sha256\": \"b68c455b8826b0d631173b526dd023cf97c906957bf578066465b7c35892d18b\", \"size\": 74076 }, { \"path\": \"/usr/local/bin/opencode-persistent-chat\", \"updated\": \"2026-05-12T22:04:05.956375+00:00\", \"sha256\": \"c5f6aad5af7c9582a7f1b1da579ffebe0f5ad68b6df8f8aa69b2250ab6c324c4\", \"size\": 555 }, { \"path\": \"/home/gleb/openclaw/openclaw-status-mcp.py\", \"updated\": \"2026-05-12T23:53:59.802312+00:00\", \"sha256\": \"e0ba1d82f774c0822e5e3456ccf099e1d6089459084c439877be0323b33e0683\", \"size\": 108940 } ] } ``` ## Recent failures ```json have explicit fail-closed bash/read permissions; use direct read/glob/grep or allowlisted sandbox/wrapper, never native asks\", \"command\": \"'/usr/local/bin/openclaw-persistent-chat-sandbox' --cwd ... cat /home/openclaw/.config/.../opencode.json\" }, { \"key\": \"model-opencode-go-monthly-usage-limit-ai-apicallerror-429-opencode-go-kimi-k2-6--b140cd0c79\", \"ts\": \"2026-05-12T22:04:05.879756+00:00\", \"tool\": \"model\", \"pattern\": \"opencode-go monthly usage limit / AI_APICallError 429\", \"outcome\": \"persistent-chat turn produced no Matrix reply and later timed out as ACP_TURN_FAILED although Playwright had only failed cleanly earlier\", \"avoid_until\": \"2026-06-11T22:04:05.879578+00:00\", \"recommended_alternative\": \"switch persistent-chat off exhausted opencode-go model, reload backend, and report API quota errors immediately when detected\", \"command\": \"opencode-go/kimi-k2.6 returned GoUsageLimitError Monthly usage limit reached\" } ] } ``` Live runtime capability context: Live Matrix-lite capabilities are dynamic; prefer status/capability tools over assuming boot-time config. - Use matrix_lite_status_context_usage_report for read-only context/session usage; it cannot reload. - Use matrix_lite_status_capability_report for current live tools, repo paths, calendar, and reload policy. - Avoid persistent-chat reloads for status/debug. Reload only on explicit user request, model switch, or context guard threshold. - Throwaway repo test markers matching `.test-*` can be cleaned with allowlisted `rm -f <repo>/.test-*`; recursive rm remains denied without exact approval. Repo paths: sfq_factory=/home/gleb/sfq-factory, automeat=/home/gleb/automeat, openclaw_tools=/home/gleb/openclaw-tools, videoctl=/home/gleb/openclaw/videoctl, matrix_lite_app=/home/matrix-lite/app, runtime_snapshot=/home/matrix-lite/runtime-repo Calendar: ics_dir=/home/matrix-lite/workspace/calendar-ics, timer=matrix-lite-vdirsyncer-calendar.timer Recent room-local conversation: User: Please repeat your last 1 message there were truncation issues Assistant: Here's the last message (the full inbox with premium stats for all identified listings): --- ## Updated Full Inbox — All Identified Listings Analyzed ### 🟢 Priority — Real humans, viewing offered **1. Eva Stefan** — *795€ / 41m², Neufahrn* Views: **526** | Published: **Today** (16.05) | Contacted: **61** | Saved: **62** | Competition: 82 Plus + 18 Basic **2. Manfred Hoth** — *1,270€ / 69m², Unterschleißheim* Views: **1,285** | Published: **Yesterday** (15.05) | Contacted: **86** | Saved: **80** | Competition: 60 Plus + 40 Basic **3. Daniel Fuchs** — said he'll reply by Monday. No expose link in message. --- ### 🟡 Medium **4. Hausverwaltung Akazienhof** — *1,170€ / 65m², Unterschleißheim* (company) Views: **1,487** | Published: 22.04 (3 wks ago) | Contacted: **77** | Saved: **103** | Competition: 52 Plus + 35 Basic **5. Arzum Kilic** — *1,600€ / 55m², Unterschleißheim* ✅ **Bestätigt** (viewing today!) **6. Armin Trakosevic** — no expose link, waiting for his July date proposal. --- ### 🔴 Dead/Buyout/Rejections | Landlord | Reason | Views | Contacted | |----------|--------|-------|-----------| | **Markus Entleutner** | Rejected | 760 | 58 | | **Bardyl Kabashi** | *neu:* …[truncated] User: So for no 5 and 6, is it not possible to get the contacted/viewed info? Assistant: I actually found the expose link for Arzum Kilic (expose/167751726) in the conversation — I just didn't check its details yet. Let me grab the stats now, and find Armin Trakosevic's too.Got it! Now let me check Armin Trakosevic too.Yes, it was possible! Here's the complete data: --- ### 5. Arzum Kilic — *1,200€ / 55m², Unterschleißheim* ✅ **Bestätigt** | Views | Published | Contacted | Saved | Competition | |-------|-----------|-----------|-------|------------| | **378** | 14.05.2026 | **22** | **26** | 18 Plus + 6 Basic | Pretty low-competition listing — only 22 people contacted her. Private person, replied quickly, viewing today. ### 6. Armin Trakosevic — *990€ / 37m², Unterschleißheim* (waiting for July date) | Views | Published | Contacted | Saved | Competition | |-------|-----------|-----------|-------|------------| | **393** | **Today** (16.05.2026) | **20** | **25** | 72 Plus + 28 Basic | Also low-contact (20), published today. Private person (\"Zuhause mit Balkon\"). He said viewing is \"voraussichtlich Anfang Juli\" — and this just got published today, so he's probably still processing. --- **Key insight on both:** Low contact numbers (20-22 each) vs 61-86 on the hott …[truncated] User: How are they published today if we were talking to them yesterday? Assistant: Good catch — that is contradictory. The conversation with Trakosevic started on **13.05** (you sent the initial message), yet his expose shows \"Veröffentlicht: 16.05.2026\" (today). Best guesses for why: 1. **Listing was taken down and re-listed** — landlords sometimes pull and repost to get fresh visibility. The new publish date resets. 2. **Renewal/refresh** — similar to how some platforms update the date when a listing is edited or \"bumped\" 3. **The Plus Insights date is when stats tracking started**, not when the listing was first created For Arzum Kilic (published 14.05, you contacted 15.05) — that one makes sense. The Trakosevic one is definitely odd though. User: Why do you think no 5 is low competition? Anything wrong with it? Use search to get an idea of other listings and housing market Assistant: Found good market data. Here's the analysis: Arzum's listing at **21.82€/m²** (1,200€ cold for 55m²) is significantly above the local market. Here are comparable 2-Zimmer listings in Unterschleißheim right now: | Listing | Price/m² | Size | Status | |---------|----------|------|--------| | **Arzum Kilic** | **21.82€** | 55m² | Private | | Valerystraße 11 | **17.48€** | 61m² | Company — \"Guter Preis\" | | Mistralstraße 39 | **16.81€** | 68m² | Company — \"Sehr guter Preis\" | | Manfred Hoth | **18.41€** | 69m² | Private — \"Sehr guter Preis\" | | Mistralstraße 15 | **16.70€** | 86m² | Company — \"Sehr guter Preis\" | So her price is **20-30% above market** for Unterschleißheim. That's the real reason she only got 22 contacts — not because it's a bad apartment, but because it's priced too high. The apartment itself looks nice (bright, 2nd floor, balcony, renovated building from 1991, EBK included), but the price deters people. Still worth it for you if you like the apartment — lower competition means higher chance of getting it, and you can negotiate down. Recent incomplete/failed turns that still matter for continuity: - 2026-05-16T14:57:11.295267Z user said: You can't negotiate down in Munich, you take it or it's gone status: user_only; reason: queued_for_conversation Recent/current attachment metadata, if any: None Message this user replied to, if any: None Queued/batched messages, if any: None Per-turn volatile reminders: - Answer normally and concisely. Put only user-visible answer text inside <matrix_lite_final>...</matrix_lite_final>. - Use the live capability context above as the source of truth for current debug/capability tools; call capability/permission/context MCP tools when uncertain instead of relying on stale boot knowledge. - If permission is needed or a bridge denies a tool, emit the structured Matrix-lite approval tag from your stable prompt; do not only describe approval in prose. - If recent incomplete/failed turns mention an unhandled user intent, address it now before moving on. - Use attachment/reply metadata when present; otherwise ignore empty metadata sections. - Do not mention internal Matrix-lite metadata unless the user asks. User message: You can't negotiate down in Munich, you take it or it's gone", "source": {"kind": "acpx-stream-ndjson", "file": "/home/matrix-lite/.acpx/sessions/ses_1cf25b9f9ffecTd9TktEik55NA.stream.ndjson", "offset": 6568446, "session_message_id": "ses_1cf25b9f9ffecTd9TktEik55NA.stream.ndjson:6568446:prompt"}} {"ts": "2026-05-16T14:58:24.664313+00:00", "role": "assistant", "kind": "message", "content": "Found good market data. Here's the analysis: Arzum's listing at **21.82€/m²** (1,200€ cold for 55m²) is significantly above the local market. Here are comparable 2-Zimmer listings in Unterschleißheim right now: | Listing | Price/m² | Size | Status | |---------|----------|------|--------| | **Arzum Kilic** | **21.82€** | 55m² | Private | | Valerystraße 11 | **17.48€** | 61m² | Company — \"Guter Preis\" | | Mistralstraße 39 | **16.81€** | 68m² | Company — \"Sehr guter Preis\" | | Manfred Hoth | **18.41€** | 69m² | Private — \"Sehr guter Preis\" | | Mistralstraße 15 | **16.70€** | 86m² | Company — \"Sehr guter Preis\" | So her price is **20-30% above market** for Unterschleißheim. That's the real reason she only got 22 contacts — not because it's a bad apartment, but because it's priced too high. The apartment itself looks nice (bright, 2nd floor, balcony, renovated building from 1991, EBK included), but the price deters people. Still worth it for you if you like the apartment — lower competition means higher chance of getting it, and you can negotiate down. </matrix_lite_final>", "source": {"kind": "acpx-stream-ndjson", "file": "/home/matrix-lite/.acpx/sessions/ses_1cf25b9f9ffecTd9TktEik55NA.stream.ndjson", "offset": 6491231, "session_message_id": "ses_1cf25b9f9ffecTd9TktEik55NA.stream.ndjson:6491231:msg_e31493d2b001EIkKMDVh12OxMo:assistant-message"}} {"ts": "2026-05-16T14:58:24.667376+00:00", "role": "assistant", "kind": "message", "content": "You're right, fair point. In this market you're lucky to even get a viewing, let alone negotiate. Strike the suggestion. So to reframe: Arzum's listing is overpriced but still worth pursuing since you already have a confirmed viewing today. If you like it, take it. The premium price also means less competition, which improves your odds. </matrix_lite_final>", "source": {"kind": "acpx-stream-ndjson", "file": "/home/matrix-lite/.acpx/sessions/ses_1cf25b9f9ffecTd9TktEik55NA.stream.ndjson", "offset": 6602128, "session_message_id": "ses_1cf25b9f9ffecTd9TktEik55NA.stream.ndjson:6602128:msg_e314a9ecd001oT3O4HoUdPb1ZE:assistant-message"}} ```